reproductive ecology of dipsadine snakes, with …eco.ib.usp.br/labvert/reproductive ecology...
TRANSCRIPT
REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF DIPSADINE SNAKES, WITHEMPHASIS ON SOUTH AMERICAN SPECIES
LIGIA PIZZATTO1,4,5, MAURICIO CANTOR
2, JULIANA LIMA DE OLIVEIRA3, OTAVIO A. V. MARQUES
4,VINICIUS CAPOVILLA
2, AND MARCIO MARTINS3
1Pos-Graduacao em Ecologia, Depto. de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas,SP, Brazil
2Graduacao em Ciencias Biologicas, Depto. de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CP 6109, 13083-970,Campinas, SP, Brazil
3Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua do Matao, Travessa 14 s/n,05508-090, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
4Laboratorio Especial de Ecologia e Evolucao, Instituto Butantan, Av. Dr. Vital Brazil 1500, 05503-900, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
ABSTRACT: A relatively large amount of variation occurs in the reproductive ecology of tropical snakes, andthis variation is generally regarded as being a consequence of seasonality in climate and prey availability. Insome groups, even closely related species may differ in their reproductive ecology; however, in others itseems to be very conservative. Here we explore whether characters related to reproduction arephylogenetically constrained in a monophyletic group of snakes, the subfamily Dipsadinae, which rangesfrom Mexico to southern South America. We provide original data on reproduction for Leptodeira annulata,Imantodes cenchoa, and three species of Sibynomorphus from southern, southeastern and central Brazil, anddata from literature for other species and populations of dipsadines. Follicular cycles were seasonal inAtractus reticulatus, Dipsas albifrons, Hypsiglena torquata, Leptodeira maculata, L. punctata, Sibynomor-phus spp. and Sibon sanniola from areas where climate is seasonal. In contrast, extended or continuousfollicular cycles were recorded in Dipsas catesbyi, D. neivai, Imantodes cenchoa, Leptodeira annulata, andNinia maculata from areas with seasonal and aseasonal climates. Testicular cycles also varied from seasonal(in H. torquata) to continuous (in Dipsas spp., Leptodeira annulata, L. maculata, N. maculata andSibynomorphus spp.). Most dipsadines are small (less than 500 mm SVL), and females attain sexual maturitywith similar relative body size than males. Sexual dimorphism occurred in terms of SVL and tail length inmost species, and clutch size tended to be small (less than five eggs). Combat behavior occurs in Imantodescenchoa, which did not show sexual size dimorphism. Reproductive timing, for both females and males,varied among species but in general there were no differences between the tribes of Dipsadinae in most ofthe reproductive characteristics, such as mean body size, relative size at sexual maturity, sexual size and taildimorphism, duration of vitellogenesis or egg-carrying in oviducts.
Key words: Dipsadinae; Fecundity; Follicular cycle; Reproduction; Sexual size dimorphism; Sexual taildimorphism; Testicular cycle
REPRODUCTIVE cycles of snakes vary fromhighly seasonal to continuous. In temperateareas, snakes usually reproduce only duringthe warmer months (usually spring) and manyspecies present nonannual cycles. In tropicalareas, however, cycles tend to be morevariable (Fitch, 1982; Seigel and Ford,1987). This higher variability can be partiallyexplained by greater climatic complexity(Greene, 1997) and food availability in tropicalareas (Santos et al., 2005; Seigel and Ford,1987). Climatic factors may be an importantvariable affecting seasonality in reproductivecycles of tropical snakes (Pizzatto andMarques, 2002, 2006). For example, Brownand Shine (2006) provided evidence that, for a
colubrid snake from tropical Australia (Tropi-donophis mairii), abiotic factors such asseasonal availability of moist incubation con-ditions were more important than bioticfactors (e.g., higher predation on eggs orhatchlings, or food availability for hatchlings)on influencing reproductive timing.
Recent studies on the evolution of ecolog-ical characters in Neotropical snakes haveshown that characters related to defenseagainst predators seem to have diversifiedapparently quickly in Neotropical snakes, witha large amount of variation within clades (e.g.,Martins, 1996). In contrast, habitat andmicrohabitat use, as well as diet and manyother characters related to feeding, seem to beconservative, i.e., they have experienced fewchanges during the lineage’s history and,consequently, the snake groups studied show5 CORRESPONDENCE: e-mail, [email protected]
Herpetologica, 64(2), 2008, 168–179
E 2008 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc.
168
little contemporary variation in these charac-ters (e.g., Martins et al., 2001, 2002). Charac-ters related to reproduction in Neotropicalsnakes seem to be relatively conservative insome phylogenetic lineages (Almeida-Santosand Salomao, 2002; Almeida Santos at al.,2006; Marques, 1996; Marques et al., 2006;Pizzatto and Marques, 2007; Pizzatto et al.,2007a, 2008), although in other groups evenclosely related species may differ widely intheir reproductive ecology (e.g., Marques,1996). Despite the efforts to study thereproductive biology of tropical snakes in thelast few decades (e.g., Balestrin and Di-Bernardo, 2005; Marques, 1996; Pizzatto andMarques, 2002; Vitt, 1987), it is still notpossible to recognize patterns in many groups,especially in areas where species diversity ishigh, such as in the Neotropics (but seeAlmeida-Santos and Salomao, 2002).
The subfamily Dipsadinae (Vidal et al.,2000; Zaher, 1999) is composed of small,slender snakes which occur from Mexico tosouthern South America (Ferrarezzi, 1994;Zaher, 1999). The monophyletism of Dipsa-dinae is suggested by both morphological andmolecular data (Cadle, 1984; Vidal et al., 2000;Wallach, 1995; Zaher, 1999), and the subfam-ily is apparently the sister group of all otherxenodontines (Vidal et al., 2000). Two appar-ently monophyletic clades comprise the Dip-sadinae: the tribes Dipsadini, composed ofaglyphous, relatively smaller, earthworm/mol-lusk-eating snakes (e.g., Adelphicos, Atractus,Geophis, Ninia, Tropidodipsas, Sibon, Dipsasand Sibynomorphus), and Leptodeirini, whichis composed of aglyphous or opisthoglyphous,relatively larger, lizard/frog-eating snakes(e.g., Eridiphas, Hypsiglena, Imantodes, Lep-todeira and Pseudoleptodeira (see Cadle,1984; Cadle and Greene, 1993; Ferrarezzi,1994; Martins and Oliveira, 1999; Rodrıguez-Robles et al., 1999; Vidal et al., 2000; Vitt,1996; Zaher, 1999).
As a further attempt to understand theextent to which reproductive characters ofNeotropical snakes are conservative (cf. Al-meida-Santos and Salomao, 2002), we hereexplored the variation in reproductive ecologyin the subfamily Dipsadinae based on originaland literature data. Specifically, our aim is to:(1) conduct an overview of reproductive
characters, such as sexual maturity anddimorphism, body sizes, reproductive cyclesand clutch size in snakes of the tribeDipsadini; and (2) investigate how thosecharacters differ between the tribes Dipsadiniand Leptodeirini.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Original data on adult Leptodeira annulata(n 5 181), Imantodes cenchoa (n 5 36),Sibynomorphus mikanii (n 5 144), S. neu-wiedi (n 5 126), and S. ventrimaculatus (n 5111) were obtained from specimens deposit-ed in the collections of Instituto Butantan(IB), Museu de Historia Natural da Uni-versidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC),Universidade Federal de Santa Maria(ZUFSM), Pontifıcia Universidade Catolicado Rio Grande do Sul (MCP), and Museu deHistoria Natural do Capao da Imbuia(MHNCI). Specimens of L. annulata werecollected in a range of localities between 11u479 N and 23u 359 S, and 39u 439 E and 56u059 W; those of I. cenchoa are from 21u 119 Nto 26u 559 S and 45u 249 E to 52u 069 W; S.mikanii from 20u 169 N to 23u 589 S and 45u429 E to 51u 209 W; S. neuwiedi from 20u 219N to 25u 009 S and 40u 399 E to 49u 429 W;and S. ventrimaculatus from 27u 289 N to 30u529 S and 51u 019 E to 54u 289 W. For eachsnake we collected data on: (1) snout–ventlength (SVL), (2) length of the right testis, (3)diameter of deferent duct, proximal to thecloaca, (4) diameter of the largest ovarianfollicle or oviductal egg, and (5) number ofwell developed follicles in secondary vitello-genesis (.10 mm) and eggs.
Gravid S. mikanii and S. neuwiedi receivedat Instituto Butantan (IB) were kept incaptivity until oviposition. Data on otherspecies of dipsadines were obtained frompublished papers. In these cases we used onlyinformation that confirmed reproductive tim-ing and fecundity in each species. Manypublished sources were not used because theyrepresent only a few, or casual, records thatwere not conclusive or comparable to ourdata. Data on testicular cycles of Hypsiglenatorquata, Leptodeira maculata, L. punctataand Ninia maculata came from histologicalanalyses (Diller and Wallace, 1986; Goldberg,2001, 2004a,b).
June 2008] HERPETOLOGICA 169
Females were considered mature if theyhad follicles in secondary vitellogenesis, ovi-ductal eggs (cf. Shine, 1978) or foldedoviducts (which indicate recent oviposition).Males were considered mature when they hadturgid testes and convoluted deferent ducts(cf. Shine, 1980; Slip and Shine, 1988). Asexual size dimorphism index (SSD) wascalculated according to Shine (1994): meanbody size of the largest sex divided by meanbody size of the smallest sex, minus one. Byconvention, positive values represent femaleslarger than males and negative values repre-sent males larger than females (Shine, 1994).
Size at maturity, represented by the SVL ofthe smallest mature snake in the samples, andrelative tail length were presented as theproportions of the mean body size andanalyzed after transformation to the arcsineof their squared root. All variables were testedfor normality and homoscedasticity prior toanalyses (Zar, 1999).
Sexual dimorphism was investigated interms of mean SVL, proportional size atmaturity (PSM) and relative tail length(RTL). We compared these variables betweensexes, using two-tailed t-Student test (Zar,1999). Sexual dimorphism in tail length wasanalyzed in L. annulata, I. cenchoa andSibynomorphus spp. with ANCOVA, usingtail length as the dependent variable, SVL asthe covariate, and sex as the factor (Zar, 1999).This analysis was not performed for the otherspecies because we did not have access to theraw data sets.
We used the Student’s t-test (Zar, 1999) totest for differences in mean SVL, PSM, RTL,SSD, clutch size, and duration of reproductivecycles between the tribes and RTL betweenhabitat use categories (terrestrial/fossorial andarboreal/semi-arboreal). To test whether SSDwas affected by body size, we used linearregressions, separately for males and females(Zar, 1999). To test whether clutch size isaffected by body size in L. annulata, I.cenchoa and Sibynomorphus spp., we usedlinear regressions. Data were log-transformedas required (Zar, 1999).
Testis length indicates sperm production(cf. Volsøe, 1944), and deferent duct diametercan indicate sperm storage (Almeida-Santos etal., 2006; Sever et al., 2002; Yokoyama and
Yoshida, 1993). Variation in testis length anddiameter of deferent duct (dependent vari-ables) were compared among seasons (factors)using ANCOVA because both variables weresignificantly correlated to snake SVL (covari-ate) (Zar, 1999).
RESULTS
Mean body sizes of adult snakes differedamong species in the dipsadines (Table 1). Allspecies, except I. cenchoa had a mean SVL ,600 mm, and the smallest species was N.maculata (mean SVL 5 226 mm; Table 1).When mean SVL is compared between theDipsadina and the Leptodeirina, neither thoseof females (means 403.6 and 517.6 mm,respectively) nor those of males (means 372.7and 457.8 mm, respectively) were significantlydifferent (t 5 21.50, P 5 0.156; t 5 21.04, P5 0.318; respectively). Males were significantlysmaller than females in all species (L. annulata,t 5 8.09, df 5 179, P , 0.001; S. mikanii, t 59.05, df 5 147, P , 0.001; S. neuwiedi, t 59.25, df 5 125, P , 0.001; S. ventrimaculatus, t5 9.48, df 5 110, P , 0.001; see originalpapers for results for other species), except forI. cenchoa (t 5 0.25, df 5 34, P 5 0.801).
Sexual size dimorphism ranged from 0.009in I. cenchoa to 0.27 in S. ventrimaculatus.The value of SSD was lower than 0.1 in allspecies of Dipsas, in I. cenchoa and in apopulation of L. annulata from the BrazilianAmazon (Table 1). Sexual size dimorphismwas not significantly different between Dipsa-dini and Leptodeirini (means 0.159 and 0.156;t 5 0.06, P 5 0.955). Sexual size dimorphismdecreased with increasing snake size; snakesize explained about one third of the variationin SSD in males (r2 5 0.35, P 5 0.034) andone fifth in females (r2 5 0.18, P , 0.001).Females of most species attained sexualmaturity at 75–85% of mean adult SVL andmales at 70–80% (Table 1), and this intersex-ual difference was not significant (t 5 1.42, P5 0.168). When the proportion of mean adultSVL at which sexes attained sexual maturity iscompared between the Dipsadini and theLeptodeirini, neither females (means 79.3 and77.3%, respectively) nor males (means 77.0and 73.1%) were significantly different (t 50.49, P 5 0.640, t 5 20.70, P 5 0.500;respectively).
170 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 64, No. 2
TA
BL
E1.
—M
ean
snou
t–ve
nt
len
gth
(SV
L)
inad
ult
fem
ales
and
mal
es,
sexu
alm
atu
rity
and
sexu
alsi
zed
imor
ph
ism
ind
ex(S
SD
)in
dip
sad
ine
snak
es.
Mea
ns
are
follo
wed
by
stan
dar
dd
evia
tion
,ra
nge
inp
aren
thes
isan
dsa
mp
lesi
ze(n
).A
llm
easu
rem
ents
are
inm
m.
Sp
ecie
sS
VL
adu
ltRR
(mea
n6
SD
)S
VL
adu
lt=
=(m
ean
6S
D)
pro
por
tion
alS
VL
atm
atu
rity
SS
DR
ange
Ref
eren
ce
Dip
sad
ini
Atr
actu
sre
ticu
latu
s30
0.1
630
.0(2
42–3
70,
n5
43)
249.
96
24.4
(198
–295
,n
558
)RR
:80
.6%
0.20
Sou
ther
nB
razi
l(2
9u39
9N
,30u
049
S,
50u
319
E,
51u
139
W)
Bal
estr
inan
dD
iB
ern
ard
o,20
05=
=:
79.2
%D
ipsa
sal
bifr
ons
470.
56
45.5
(400
–590
,n
563
)43
5.9
657
.7(3
25–5
40,
n5
50)
RR:
85.0
%0.
08S
outh
ern
Bra
zil
(26u
189
N,
22u
569
S,
48u
509
E,
49u
149
W)
Har
tman
net
al.,
2002
==
:74
.6%
Dip
sas
cate
sbyi
494.
196
63.9
1(3
31–6
40,
n5
54)
463.
696
53.7
8(3
41–5
75,
n5
65)
RR:
67.0
%0.
06N
orth
east
ern
Bra
zil
(14u
009
N,
18u
009
S,
39u
009
E,
41u
009
W)
Alv
eset
al.,
2005
==
:73
.5%
Dip
sas
cate
sbyi
402.
16
48.6
(338
–542
,n
551
)—
RR:
84.0
%A
maz
onia
and
trop
ical
For
est
regi
on(6u
489
N,
17u
279
S,
48u
309
E,
76u
589
W)
Zu
get
al.,
1979
Dip
sas
neiv
ai58
4.41
686
.67
(432
–820
,n
591
)52
1.79
681
.29
(298
–702
,n
599
)RR
:73
.9%
0.05
Nor
thea
ster
nB
razi
l(1
4u00
9N
,18u
009
S,
39u
009
E,
41u
009
W)
Alv
eset
al.,
2005
==
:57
.1%
Geo
phis
brac
hyce
phal
us33
3.6
626
.4(2
95–3
65,
n5
12)
—RR
:88
.4%
—C
osta
Ric
a(1
0u16
9N
,9u
339
S,
83u
30E
,84u
489
W)
Sas
a,19
93=
=:
—N
inia
mac
ulat
a22
6.0
622
.0(1
75–2
75,
n5
25)
201.
06
15.0
(179
–228
,n
516
)RR
:77
%0.
12C
osta
Ric
a(1
1u00
9N
,9u
009
S,
83u
009
E,
85u
309
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2004
b=
=:
89%
Siby
nom
orph
usm
ikan
ii43
7.6
661
.3(3
39–5
80,
n5
92)
352.
86
37.7
(280
–510
,n
552
)RR
:77
.5%
0.24
Sou
thea
ster
nB
razi
l(2
0u16
9N
,23u
589
S,
45u
429
E,
51u
209
W)
Th
isw
ork
==
:79
.4%
Siby
nom
orph
usne
uwie
di52
6.4
658
.9(4
15–6
60,
n5
72)
422.
56
66.8
(254
–541
,n
554
)RR
:78
.8%
0.25
Sou
ther
nan
dS
outh
east
ern
Bra
zil
(20u
219
N,
25u
009
S,
40u
399
E,
49u
429
W)
Th
isw
ork
==
:60
.1%
Siby
nom
orph
usve
ntri
mac
ulat
us42
2.4
648
.4(3
45–5
77,
n5
71)
333.
96
45.0
(240
–413
,n
540
)RR
:81
.7%
0.27
Sou
thea
ster
nB
razi
l(2
7u28
9N
,30u
529
S,
51u
019
E,
54u
289
W)
Th
isw
ork
==
:71
.9%
Sibo
nsa
nnio
la24
0.6
622
.6(2
01–2
92,
n5
42)
?RR
:83
.5%
—Y
uca
tan
Pen
insu
la,
Mex
ico
(22u
009
N,
20u
009
S,
87u
009
E,
90u
009
W)
Kof
ron
,19
83
Lep
tod
eir
ini
Hyp
sigl
ena
torq
uata
360.
06
45.4
(310
–503
,n
542
)30
0.0
627
.2(2
37–3
68,
n5
67)
RR:
86%
0.20
Ari
zon
a,E
UA
(37u
009
N,
31u
309
S,
109u
009
E,
114u
309
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2001
==
:79
%Im
anto
des
cenc
hoa
715.
96
67.7
(621
–901
,n
533
)—
RR:
86.7
%—
Eq
uat
oria
lan
dT
rop
ical
For
est
regi
on(1
5u53
9N
,0u
039
S,
73u
159
E,
92u
489
W)
Zu
get
al.,
1979
Iman
tode
sce
ncho
a77
1.2
667
.9(6
40–8
80,
n5
18)
764.
26
95.0
(601
–972
,n
518
)RR
:83
.0%
0.00
9S
,S
EB
razi
l(2
1u11
9N
,26u
559
S,
45u
249
E,
52u
069
W)
Th
isw
ork
==
:78
.6%
Lep
tode
ira
annu
lata
595.
26
89.1
(454
–841
,n
510
5)50
2.2
660
.2(3
67–6
44,
n5
80)
RR:
76.3
%0.
19C
entr
alan
dS
outh
east
ern
Bra
zil
(11u
479
N,
23u
359
S,
39u
439
E,
56u
059
W)
Th
isw
ork
==
:73
%L
epto
deir
aan
nula
ta54
5.6
611
.5(4
97–6
09,
n5
12)
498.
66
12.6
(431
–584
,n
518
)RR
:91
.1%
0.09
Am
azon
regi
on(0u
009
N,
10u
009
S,
50u
009
E,
78u
009
W)
Vit
t,19
96=
=:
86.4
%L
epto
deir
am
acul
ata
470.
16
82.8
(317
–630
,n
519
)38
4.4
652
.7(2
80–4
44,
n5
27)
RR:
67%
0.22
SW
Mex
ico
(26u
009
N,
16u
009
S,
98u
009
E,
109u
009
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2004
a=
=:
73%
Lep
tode
ira
punc
tata
391.
56
59.6
(292
–523
,n
526
)33
8.2
641
.1(2
76–4
51,
n5
41)
RR:
75%
0.16
WM
exic
o(2
6u00
9N
,21u
009
S,
103u
009
E,
109u
009
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2004
a=
=:
82%
June 2008] HERPETOLOGICA 171
Relative tail length of male and femalesnakes did not differ significantly betweenDipsadini and Leptodeirini (means 22.6%and 30.0% of body length for females, and27.5% and 35.3% for males; t 5 20.92, P 50.388, and t 5 20.966, P 5 0.371, respectively;Table 2). When all species of Dipsadinae areconsidered together, tails were significantlylonger in arboreal and semi-arboreal speciesthan in fossorial and terrestrial species, both forfemales and males (medians 34.5% and 17.4%of body length for females, and 39.0% and21.8% for males; t 5 24.03, P 5 0.005, and t 524.18, P 5 0.004, respectively; Table 2). Tailswere also significantly longer in males than infemales of L. annulata, I. cenchoa, S. mikanii,S. neuwiedi, and S. ventrimaculatus (AN-COVA, all F . 2.0, all P , 0.025) and in otherdipsadines (Table 2, for statistical analyses, seedata in original papers).
Among the Leptodeirina, in Leptodeiraannulata, follicles in secondary vitellogenesiswere found from late February and March toearly December and oviductal eggs from May
to August (Fig. 1A). In I. cenchoa, vitellogenicfollicles were found in September and eggswere recorded from November to January(Fig. 1B). Among the Dipsadina, seasonalvitellogenesis was recorded for S. mikaniiand S. neuwiedi mostly from July to Decem-ber and eggs were recorded from late Augustto February (Fig. 1C,D). In S. ventrimacula-tus, vitellogenesis was shorter, occurringmostly from October to December, and eggswere recorded from October to February(Fig. 1E). Thus, a seasonal reproductive cycle,with vitellogenesis restricted to the warmerand rainier months of the year, was observedin Sibynomorphus spp. in our analyses, andalso in Atractus reticulatus, Dipsas albifrons(from coastal Atlantic Forest in southernBrazil), H. torquata, L. maculata, L. punctataand Sibon sanniola in literature data (seeFig. 2). In Dipsas catesbyi and D. neivai fromthe coastal Atlantic Forest in northeasternBrazil and in N. maculata from Costa Ricacycles were continuous (Fig. 2). Leptodeiraannulata, Geophis brachycephalus and prob-
TABLE 2.—Tail length (as % of SVL) in males and females, mean clutch size and habitat of dipsadine snakes.
Species Tail length (as % of SVL) Mean clutch size (6SD) Habitat Reference
DipsadiniAtractus reticulatus RR: 11.6%,
==: 15.7%12.7 6 0.8 (1–3, n 5 6) Fossorial Balestrin and
Di-Bernardo, 2005Dipsas albifrons — 3.9 6 1.8 (1–8, n 5 33) Arboreal Hartmann et al., 2002Dipsas catesbyi RR: 36.5%,
==: 39.0%22.0 6 0.82 (1–3, n 5 10) Arboreal Zug et al., 1979
Dipsas catesbyi — 3.63 6 1.66 (1–6, n 5 13) Arboreal Alves et al., 2005Dipsas neivai — 3.91 6 1.95 (1–8, n 5 22) Arboreal Alves et al., 2005Geophys brachycephalus RR: 17.3%, ==: — 4.2 6 1.17 (3–6, n 5 6) Terrestrial-
fossorialSasa, 1993
Ninia maculata — 2.9 6 1.1 (1–5, n 5 14) Semi-fossorial Goldberg, 2004bSibynomorphus mikanii RR: 20.4%,
==: 24.8%15.7 6 1.7 (3–10, n 5 29) Terrestrial This work
Sibynomorphus neuviedi RR: 26.9%,==: 31.1%1
6.4 6 2.4 (4–12, n 5 14) Semi-arboreal This work
Sibynomorphusventrimaculatus
RR: 22.7%,==: 26.8%1
4.8 6 1.0 (3–7, n 5 33) Terrestrial This work
Sibon sanniola — 3.1 6 0.70 (2–5, n 5 28) ? Kofron, 1983LeptodeiriniHypsiglena torquata RR: 15.0%,
==: 20.0%23.2 6 1.5 (1–6, n 5 9) Terrestrial Goldberg, 2001;
Runquist, 2002Imantodes cenchoa — 2.0 6 0.71 (1–3, n 5 5) Arboreal Zug et al., 1979Imantodes cenchoa RR: 45.0%,
==: 47.0%13.3 6 1.70 (1–7, n 5 13) Arboreal This work
Leptodeira annulata ==: 30.0%,==: 39.0%1
7.3 6 2.53 (3–13, n 5 23) Arboreal This work, but seealso Duellman, 1958
Leptodeira maculata — 8.7 6 1.5 (7–11, n 5 7) Arboreal Goldberg, 2004aLeptodeira punctata — 7.8 6 1.7 (6–11, n 5 9) Arboreal Goldberg, 2004a
1 Statistically significant differences.2 No statistical tests performed, but differences are apparent.
172 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 64, No. 2
ably I. cenchoa had extended cycles (abouteight months; Fig. 2). Duration of vitellogen-esis, occurrence of oviductal eggs or theduration of complete reproductive period(months in which vitellogenesis and/or pres-ence of oviductal eggs occurred) did not differbetween Dipsadina (means 8.4, 7.1 and15.5 mo, respectively) and Leptodeirina (5.8,5.0 and 10.8 mo, respectively; t 5 1.82, P 50.093 for vitellogenesis duration, t 5 1.37, P 50.194 for duration of eggs in oviducts, and t 51.63, P 5 0.127 for the complete cycle).
Clutch size is relatively small in thedipsadines (Table 2) and is not significantlydifferent between the Dipsadini and theLeptodeirini (means 5.3 and 3.9 eggs, respec-tively; t 5 1.47, P 5 0.160). Clutch size wasnot different between terrestrial/fossorialsnakes and arboreal/semiarboreal ones (t 50.45, P 5 0.656). Snout–vent length wassignificantly related to clutch size in S. mikanii(r2 5 0.39, P 5 0.037; Fig. 3A), S. neuwiedi(r2 5 0.63, P 5 0.015; Fig. 3B), S. ventrima-culatus (r2 5 0.59, P , 0.001; Fig. 3C) and I.cenchoa (r2 5 0.68, P 5 0.010; Fig. 3E), butnot in L. annulata (data log-transformed, r2 50.34, P 5 0.101; Fig. 3D). When all speciesare considered together, clutch size seems not
to be a function of female SVL (Fig. 4). WhenI. cenchoa populations and D. neivai (all withlow relative fecundity) are removed from theanalysis the relationship between SVL andclutch size become positive and significant (r2
5 0.33, P 5 0.025, Fig. 4).Testis length and deferent duct diameter
did not differ significantly among seasons in L.annulata and Sibynomorphus spp. (Table 3),which indicates continuous sperm productionand absence of sperm storage by males. Dataon I. cenchoa were not sufficient to compareeither right testis length or deferent ductdiameter among seasons.
Sperm production occurred throughoutthe year in the Dipsadini and in spring-summer in the only species of Leptodeirinistudied. Sperm was found in the deferent ductthroughout the year in all Dipsadini except N.maculata (in which it occurred in spring-autumn), and in spring-summer in bothspecies of Leptodeirini studied (Table 4).
DISCUSSION
In all species of the subfamily Dipsadinaefor which data on size at sexual maturity wereavailable, males and females attained sexual
FIG. 1.—Seasonal variation in the diameter of the largest ovarian follicle (full circles) and oviductal eggs (emptycircles) in Leptodeira annulata, Imantodes cenchroa and Sibynomorphus spp. from Brazil. Triangles represent egg-laying in snakes received gravid at IB. Follicles above dotted line were in secondary vitellogenesis.
June 2008] HERPETOLOGICA 173
maturity at similar relative body sizes. Thedegree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD)decreased with increasing body size in thedipsadines. This pattern is opposite to thatfound in the tribe Xenodontini (Pizzatto et al.,
2008), a clade within the Xenodontinae (Vidalet al., 2000; Zaher, 1999). Males larger thanfemales or absence of sexual dimorphismusually occurs in species in which malesexhibit combat behavior during the mating
FIG. 2.—Reproductive cycles in Dipsadinae snakes. Lines: Vitellogenesis time. Boxes: Oviductal eggs or egg-laying.BRA 5 Brazil, USA 5 United States of America, MEX 5 Mexico, COR 5 Costa Rica. Full lines and boxes 5 observed,dotted lines and boxes 5 inferred.
174 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 64, No. 2
season (Shine, 1994). The lowest SSD occursin Imantodes cenchoa and this is the onlyspecies in which the largest body size isattained by males and not females. Male-malefighting behavior and mating was recorded inthis species in October (spring) in theBrazilian Amazon (see Santos-Costa andPrudente, 2005) and, an aggregation of threemales and one female in a Peruvian rainforestin May (spring) (Doan and Arriaga, 1999) alsosuggest combat. Male-male ritual combat hasnot been reported in any other dipsadine,xenodontines, nor in the Heterodon-Faranciagroup, the basal lineage of both clades (seeVidal et al., 2000). Thus, either ritual combatremains unnoticed due to elusive habits of thesnakes and suboptimal research efforts or it isan autapomorphy of Imantodes cenchoa with-in this large clade of colubrids.
Sexual dimorphism also occurs in tail lengthin all species in both tribes (Dipsadini: A.reticulatus, Balestrin and Di-Bernardo, 2005;D. albifrons, Hartmann et al., 2002; D.catesbyi, Zug et al., 1979; Sibynomorphusspp., this study; Leptodeirini: H. torquata,Runquist, 2002; I. cenchoa, Zug et al., 1979,this study; L. annulata, Vitt, 1996, this study).A longer tail is expected in males due to thepresence of the hemipenes and their retractormuscles (King, 1989). However, in manyarboreal snakes this dimorphism is absent(Fowler and Salomao, 1994; Pizzatto andMarques, 2007) probably because a long tailmay be advantageous for arboreal life (Lilly-white and Henderson, 1993; Martins et al.,2001). Tail dimorphism occurs in both terres-trial and arboreal dipsadines, but tail isproportionally much longer in arboreal and
FIG. 3.—Relationship between clutch size and female snout–vent length in Leptodeira annulata, Imantodes cenchroaand Sibynomorphus spp. from Brazil.
June 2008] HERPETOLOGICA 175
semi-arboreal species of dipsadines than interrestrial and fossorial species, as observed inother studies (e.g., Hartmann and Marques,2005; Martins et al., 2001; Pizzatto andMarques, 2007; Pizzatto et al., 2007b).
Reproductive cycles vary among snakespecies and also can differ between femalesand males (Seigel and Ford, 1987). Dipsa-dines usually show seasonal reproductivecycles in females, but duration is variableamong species. Some species occurring inareas with a seasonal climate exhibit cyclesrestricted to the warm and rainier seasons, butL. annulata seems to have extended follicularcycles even in areas where climate is seasonal(e.g., southeastern and central Brazil between9u 349 N and 23u 359 S). In contrast, more
seasonal climates seem to restrict the femalecycles in some species, such as D. albifronsand S. ventrimaculatus from southern Brazil.These species show more restricted timing ofvitellogenesis than their congenerics fromlower latitudes.
Testicular cycles are not available for mostspecies of dipsadines; however, our dataindicate that it is variable within this subfam-ily. Hypsiglena torquata from temperate areashas a seasonal sperm production, occurring inthe warmest periods of the year. Despite therecords of seasonal sperm production in manytropical snakes (Fitch, 1982; Shine, 1977),most tropical species of dipsadines showcontinuous testicular activity. Cycles alsodiffered among sexes in the same species.For example, while females of Sibynomorphusspp. have seasonal cycles, males producesperm continuously, indicating that spermproduction is less costly than egg production(Trivers, 1972), at least in tropical snakes.
In general, dipsadine snakes produce smallclutches, probably because of the small size ofthese snakes. Also, the very slender body inarboreal species such as L. annulata and I.cenchoa can strongly reduce body cavity spaceto carry eggs, resulting in smaller clutches (seePizzatto et al., 2007b). Thus, although femalebody size is important in determining clutchsize for some species, other factors mayinfluence this trait (e.g., habitat use, feedinghabits, phylogeny).
Most reproductive characters we analyzedfor the dipsadines seem to be conservativewithin the tribe. The tribes Dipsadini andLeptodeirini did not differ in the amount ofSSD, the proportion of mean SVL at whichsexes attained sexual maturity, relative tail
FIG. 4.—Relationship between mean clutch size andmean female snout–vent length in Dipsadinae snakes.Circles 5 arboreal/semi-arboreal species, triangles 5terrestrial, squares 5 fossorial. Data from: Alves et al.,2005, Balestin and Di-Bernardo, 2005; Goldberg, 2001,2004a,b; Hartmann et al., 2002, Kofron, 1983; Sasa, 1993;Vitt, 1996; Zug et al., 1979; this work.
TABLE 3.—Statistical results of variation in right testis length and diameter of deferent duct among seasons in fourdipsadine snakes from Brazil.
Species Right testis length ANCOVA Deferent duct diameter ANCOVA
DipsadiniSibynomorphus mikanii Slopes: F3,32 5 0.11, P 5 0.954 Insufficient data
Intercept: F3,33 5 2.22, P 5 0.102Sibynomorphus neuwiedi Slopes: F3,25 5 1.01, P 5 0.403 Slopes: F3,22 5 0.20, P 5 0.827
Intercept: F3,26 5 0.96, P 5 0.423 Intercept: F3,23 5 2.58, P 5 0.076Sibynomorphus ventrimaculatus Slopes: F3,22 5 0.95, P 5 0.434 Slopes: F3,21 5 1.48, P 5 0.248
Intercept: F3,23 5 1.07, P 5 0.379 Intercept: F3,22 5 0.08, P 5 0.967LeptodeiriniLeptodeira annulata Slopes: F3,71 5 0.74, P 5 0.530 Slopes F3,69 5 1.86, P 5 0.144
Intercept: F3,72 5 0.80, P 5 0.495 Intercept: F3,70 5 0.49, P 5 0.688
176 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 64, No. 2
TA
BL
E4.
—M
ale
rep
rod
uct
ive
cycl
esin
dip
sad
ine
snak
es.
Sp
ecie
sS
per
mp
rod
uct
ion
Sp
erm
ind
efer
ent
du
ctL
ocat
ion
ofco
llect
ion
Ref
eren
ce
Dip
sad
ini
Dip
sas
neiv
aiT
hro
ugh
out
the
year
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arN
orth
east
ern
Bra
zil
(14u
009
N,
18u
009
S,
39u
009
E,
41u
009
W)
Alv
eset
al.,
2005
Dip
sas
cate
sby
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arT
hro
ugh
out
the
year
Nor
thea
ster
nB
razi
l(1
4u00
9N
,18u
009
S,
39u
009
E,
41u
009
W)
Alv
eset
al.,
2005
Hyp
sygl
ena
torq
uata
Sp
rin
g–su
mm
erS
pri
ng–
Su
mm
erA
rizo
na
–U
SA
(37u
009
N,
31u
309
S,
109u
009
E,
114u
309
W),
Idah
o–
US
A(4
9u00
N,
42u
009
S,
112u
309
E,
116u
309
W)
Dill
eran
dW
alla
ce,
1986
;G
old
ber
g,20
01,
Nin
iam
acul
ata
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arS
pri
ng–
Au
tum
nC
osta
Ric
a(1
1u00
9N
,9u
009
S,
83u
009
E,
85u
309
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2004
b
Siby
nom
orph
usm
ikan
niT
hro
ugh
out
the
year
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arS
outh
east
ern
Bra
zil
(20u
169
N,
23u
589
S,
45u
429
E,
51u
209
W)
Th
isw
ork
Siby
nom
orph
usne
uwie
dii
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arT
hro
ugh
out
the
year
Sou
thea
ster
nB
razi
l(2
0u21
9N
,25
u00
9S
,40u
399
E,
49u
429
W)
Th
isw
ork
Siby
nom
orph
usve
ntri
mac
ulat
usT
hro
ugh
out
the
year
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arS
outh
ern
Bra
zil
(27u
289
N,
30u
529
S,
51u
019
E,
54u
289
W)
Th
isw
ork
Lep
tod
eir
ini
Lep
tode
ira
annu
lata
Th
rou
ghou
tth
eye
arT
hro
ugh
out
the
year
Sou
thea
ster
nan
dC
entr
alB
razi
l(1
1u47
9N
,23u
359
S,
39u
439
E,
56u
059
W)
Th
isw
ork
Lep
tode
ira
mac
ulat
aS
pri
ng–
Au
tum
nS
pri
ng–
Au
tum
nS
WM
exic
o(2
6u00
9N
,16
u00
9S
,98u
009
E,
109u
009
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2004
a
Lep
tode
ira
punc
tata
—S
pri
ng–
Su
mm
erW
Mex
ico
(26u
009
N,
21u
009
S,
103u
009
E,
109u
009
W)
Gol
db
erg,
2004
a
June 2008] HERPETOLOGICA 177
length of both sexes, duration of vitellogene-sis, egg-carrying period, duration of thecomplete reproductive cycle, and clutch size.However, tribes differ in the timing ofreproductive cycles in females and, apparent-ly, in the duration of sperm production inmales. Thus, reproduction as a whole seems tohave changed relatively little during thehistory of the dipsadines, as already observedin other monophyletic lineages of Neotropicalsnakes, e.g., the genera Bothrops (Almeida-Santos and Salomao, 2002) and Micrurus(Almeida-Santos et al., 2006).
Acknowledgments.—We thank S. Cechin (ZUFSM), M.Di-Bernardo (MCP), F. L. Franco (IB), J. C. Moura Leite(MHNCI) and I. Sazima (ZUEC), for permission toanalyze specimens under their care and Valdir Germano(IB) for help in the laboratory. S. Goldberg helped withliterature, B. Phillips and M. Crossland reviewed the textand made important comments. We also thank twoanonymous referees for helpful comments and sugges-tions. CNPq provided fellowships to MM, OAVM and MCand FAPESP provided fellowships to JLM and LP. Thisstudy was partly funded by FAPESP.
LITERATURE CITED
ALMEIDA-SANTOS, S. M., AND M. G. SALOMAO. 2002.Reproduction in Neotropical pitvipers, with emphasison species of the genus Bothrops. Pp. 445–462. InG. W. Schuett, M. E. Douglas, M. Hoggren, and H. W.Greene, H. W (Eds.), Biology of the Vipers. EagleMountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah, U.S.A.
ALMEIDA-SANTOS, S. M., L. PIZZATTO, AND O. A. V.MARQUES. 2006. Intra–sex synchrony and inter–sexcoordination in the reproductive timing of the coralsnake Micrurus corallinus (Elapidae) in Brazil. Herpe-tological Journal 16:371–376.
ALVES, F. Q., A. J. S. ARGOLO, AND J. JIM. 2005. Biologiareprodutiva de Dipsas neivai Amaral e D. catesby(Sentzen) (Serpentes, Colubridae) no Sudeste da Bahia,Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22:573–579.
BALESTRIN, R. L., AND M. DI-BERNARDO. 2005. Reproduc-tive biology of Atractus reticulatus (Boulenger 1885)(Serpentes, Colubridae) in southern Brazil. Herpeto-logical Journal 15:195–199.
BROWN, G. P., AND R. SHINE. 2006. Why do most tropicalanimals reproduce seasonally? Testing hypotheses onan Australian snake. Ecology 87:133–143.
CADLE, J. E. 1984. Molecular systematics of Neotropicalxenodontine snakes: I. South American xenodontines.Herpetologica 40:8–20.
CADLE, J. E., AND H. W. GREENE. 1993. Phylogenetic patterns,biogeography, and the ecological structure of neotropicalsnake assemblages. Pp. 281–293. In R. E. Ricklefs and D.Schluter (Eds.), Species Diversity in Ecological Commu-nities. Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Univer-sity of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
DILLER, L. V., AND R. L. WALLACE. 1986. Aspects of thelife-history and ecology of the desert night snake,
Hypsiglena torquata deserticola: Colubridae, in south-western Idaho. Southwestern Naturalist 31:55–64.
DOAN, T. M., AND W. A. ARRIAGA. 1999. Imantodescenchoa. Aggregation. Herpetological Review 30:102.
DUELLMAN, W. E. 1958. A monographic study of thecolubrid snake genus Leptodeira. Bulletin of theAmerican Museum of Natural History 114:1–152.
FERRAREZZI, H. 1994. Uma sinopse dos generos eclassificacao das Serpentes (Squamata): II. FamıliaColubridae. Pp. 81–91. In L. B. Nascimento, A. T.Bernardes, and G. A. Cotta (Eds.), Herpetologia noBrasil, Volume 1. Puc-MG, Fundacao Biodiversitas eFundacao Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte, MinasGerais, Brazil.
FITCH, H. S. 1982. Reproductive cycles in tropical reptiles.Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History ofKansas 96:1–53.
FOWLER, I. R., AND M. G. SALOMAO. 1994. A study of sexualdimorphism in six species from the colubrid snakegenus Philodryas. The Snake 26:117–122.
GOLDBERG, S. R. 2001. Reproduction in the night snake,Hypsiglena torquata (Serpentes: Colubridae), fromArizona. Texas Journal of Science 53:107–114.
GOLDBERG, S. R. 2004a. Notes on reproduction in thesouthwestern cat-eyed snake, Leptodeira maculata, andwestern cat-eyed snake, Leptodeira punctata (Ser-pentes: Colubridae), from Mexico. Southwestern Nat-uralist 49:409–412.
GOLDBERG, S. R. 2004b. Reproduction in the coffee snake,Ninia maculata (Serpentes: Colubridae), from CostaRica. Texas Journal of Science 56:81–84.
GREENE, H. W. 1997. Snakes. The Evolution of Mysteryin Nature. University of California Press, Berkeley,California, U.S.A.
HARTMANN, P. A., AND O. A. V. MARQUES. 2005. Diet andhabitat use of two sympatric species of Philodryas(Colubridae), in south Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia26:25–31.
HARTMANN, M. T., M. L. DEL GRANDE, M. J. C. GONDIM,M. C. MENDES, AND O. A. V. MARQUES. 2002.Reproduction and activity of the snail-eating snake,Dipsas albifrons (Colubridae), in the southern AtlanticForest in Brazil. Studies on Neotropical FaunaEnvironment 37:111–114.
KING, R. B. 1989. Sexual dimorphism in tail length: Sexualselection, natural selection, or morphological con-straint? Biological Journal of Linnean Society38:133–154.
KOFRON, C. P. 1983. Female reproductive cycle of theNeotropical snail-eating snake Sibon sanniola inNorthern Yucatan, Mexico. Copeia 1983:963–969.
LILLYWHITE, H. B., AND R. W. HENDERSON. 1993.Behavioral and functional ecology of arboreal snakes.Pp. 1–48. In R. A. Seigel and J. T. Collins (Eds.),Snakes: Ecology & Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York,New York, U.S.A.
MARQUES, O. A. V. 1996. Biologia Reprodutiva deErythrolamprus aesculapii Linnaeus (Colubridae), noSudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia13:747–753.
MARQUES, O. A. V., F. STENDER-OLIVEIRA, R. J. SAWAYA,AND F. G. R. FRANCA. 2006. Ecology of the colubridsnake Pseudablabes agassizii in south-eastern SouthAmerica. Herpetological Journal 16:37–45.
178 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 64, No. 2
MARTINS, M. 1996. Defensive tactics in lizards and snakes:The potential contribution of the neotropical fauna.Pp. 185–199. In Anais do XIV Encontro Anual deEtologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Etologia, Uberlandia,Minas Gerais, Brazil.
MARTINS, M., AND M. E. OLIVEIRA. 1999. Natural history ofsnakes in forests in the Manaus region, CentralAmazonia, Brazil. Herpetological Natural History6:78–150.
MARTINS, M., M. S. ARAUJO, R. J. SAWAYA, AND R. NUNES.2001. Diversity and evolution of macrohabitat use, bodysize and morphology in a monophyletic group ofNeotropical pitvipers (Bothrops). Journal of Zoology254:529–538.
MARTINS, M., O. A. V. MARQUES, AND I. SAZIMA. 2002.Ecological and phylogenetic correlates of feeding habitsin Neotropical pitvipers (Genus Bothrops).Pp. 307–328. In G. W. Schuett, M. Hoggren, M. E.Douglas, and H. W. Greene (Eds.), Biology of theVipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain,Utah, U.S.A.
PIZZATTO, L., AND O. A. V. MARQUES. 2002. Reproductivebiology of the false coral snake Oxyrhopus guibei(Serpentes: Colubridae) from southeastern Brazil.Amphibia-Reptilia 23:495–504.
PIZZATTO, L., AND O. A. V. MARQUES. 2006. Interpopula-tonal variation in reproductive cycles and activity of thewater snake Liophis miliaris (Colubridae) in Brazil.Herpetological Journal 16:353–362.
PIZZATTO, L., AND O. A. V. MARQUES. 2007. Reproductiveecology of Boine snakes with emphasis on Brazilianspecies and a comparison to pythons. South AmericanJournal of Herpetology 2:107–122.
PIZZATTO, L., S. M. ALMEIDA-SANTOS, AND O. A. V.MARQUES. 2007a. Biologia reprodutiva de serpentesBrasileiras. Pp. 201–221. In L. B. Nascimento and M. E.Oliveira (Eds.), Herpetologia no Brasil II. SociedadeBrasileira de Herpetologia, Belo Horizonte, MinasGerais, Brazil.
PIZZATTO, L., S. M. ALMEIDA-SANTOS, AND R. SHINE. 2007b.Life history adaptations to arboreality in snakes.Ecology 88:359–366.
PIZZATTO, L., R. S. JORDAO, AND O. A. V. MARQUES. 2008.Overview of reproductive strategies in Xenodontini(Serpentes: Colubridae: Xenodontinae) with new datafor Xenodon neuwiedii and Waglerophis merremii.Journal of Herpetology 42:153–162.
RODRIGUEZ-ROBLES, J. A., D. G. MULCAHY, AND H. W.GREENE. 1999. Feeding ecology of the desert night-snake, Hypsiglena torquata (Colubridae). Copeia1999:93–100.
RUNQUIST, E. M. 2002. Natural history of the night snake,Hypsiglena torquata, in Kansas. Journal of KansasHerpetology 4:16–20.
SANTOS, X., G. A. LLORENTE, M. FERICHE, J. M. PLEGUE-
ZUELOS, F. CASALS, AND A. DE SOSTOA. 2005. Foodavailability induces geographic variation in reproductivetiming of an aquatic oviparus snake (Natrix maura).Amphibia-Reptilia 26:183–191.
SANTOS-COSTA, M. C., AND A. L. C. PRUDENTE. 2005.Imantodes cenchoa (Chunck-headed snake). Mating.Herpetological Review 36:324.
SASA, M. 1993. Distribution and reproduction of the greyearth snake Geophis brachycephalus (Serpentes: Colu-
bridae) in Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical41:295–297.
SEIGEL, R. A., AND N. B. FORD. 1987. ReproductiveEcology. Pp. 210–252. In R. A. Seigel, J. T. Collins, andS. S. Novak (Eds.), Snakes: Ecology & Behavior.McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, New York, U.S.A.
SEVER, D. M., R. A. STEVENS, T. J. RYAN, AND W. C.HAMLETT. 2002. Ultrastructure of the ReproductiveSystem of the Black Swamp Snake (Seminatrix pygaea).III. Sexual Segment of the Male Kidney. Journal ofMorphology 252:238–254.
SHINE, R. 1977. Reproduction in Australian ElapidSnakes. I. Testicular cycles and mating seasons.Australian Journal of Zoology 25:647–653.
SHINE, R. 1978. Growth rates and sexual maturation in sixspecies of Australian elapid snakes. Herpetologica 34:73–79.
SHINE, R. 1980. Comparative ecology of three Australiansnake species of the genus Cacophis (Serpentes,Colubridae). Copeia 1980:831–838.
SHINE, R. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism in snakesrevisited. Copeia 1994:326–346.
SLIP, D. J., AND R. SHINE. 1988. The reproductive biologyand mating system of diamond pythons, Morelia spilota(Serpentes: Boidae). Herpetologica 44:396–404.
TRIVERS, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexualselection. Pp. 136–179. In B. Campbell (Ed.), SexualSelection and the Descent of Man. Aldine-Atherton,Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
VIDAL, N., S. G. KINDL, A. WONG, AND S. B. HEDGES. 2000.Phylogenetic relationships of Xenodontine snakesinferred from 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14:389–402.
VITT, L. J. 1987. Communities. Pp. 335–365. In R. A.Seigel, J. T. Collins, and S. S. Novak (Eds.), Snakes:Ecology & Behavior. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York,New York, U.S.A.
VITT, L. J. 1996. Ecological observations on the tropicalcolubrid snake Leptodeira annulata. HerpetologicalNatural History 4:69–76.
VOLSØE, H. 1944. Seasonal variation of the malereproductive organs of Vipera berus (L.). SpoliaZoologia Museum Hauniensis 5:1–157.
YOKOYAMA, F., AND H. YOSHIDA. 1993. The reproductivecycle of the male habu, Trimeresurus flavoviridis. TheSnake 25:55–62.
WALLACH, V. 1995. Revalidation of the genus Tropido-dipsas Gunther, with notes on the Dipsadini andNothopsini (Serpentes: Colubridae). Journal of Herpe-tology 29:476–481.
ZAHER, H. 1999. Hemipenial morphology of the South-American xenodontines snakes, with a proposal for amonophyletic xenodontinae and reappraisal of colu-broid hemipenis. Bulletin of the American Museum ofNatural History 260:1–168.
ZAR, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th Ed. PrenticeHall, Upper Saddler River, New Jersey, U.S.A.
ZUG, G. R., S. B. HEDGES, AND S. SUNKEL. 1979. Variation inreproductive parameters of three Neotropical snakes,Coniophanes fissidens, Dipsas catesbyi, and Imantodescenchoa. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 300:1–18.
.Accepted: 15 February 2008
.Associate Editor: Brad Moon
June 2008] HERPETOLOGICA 179