rogueing symptomatic vines for controlling viral diseases ... · symptomatic vines tested positive...

1
Major Viral Diseases Rogueing symptomatic vines for controlling viral diseases in vineyards Sridhar Jarugula, Raphael Adegbola, Arunabha Mitra, Noma Chingandu, Chandra Thammina, Prashant Swamy, Basavaraj Bagewadi and Naidu Rayapati Department of Plant Pathology, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350 Viral diseases are one of the most serious impediments to the sustainability of Washington’s grape and wine industry. Therefore, management of viral diseases is essential for healthy vineyards. Rogueing or removal of symptomatic plants is one of the commonly used cultural practices for controlling viral diseases in crops. Grapevine leafroll (GLD) and red blotch (GRBD) are the two economically important viral diseases in Washington State vineyards (Fig. 1). GLD is caused by Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) and GRBD is caused by Grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV). Our research has consistently shown that GLRaV-3 is by far the most insidious and widely distributed than GRBV in Washington vineyards (Adiputra et al., 2018. Plant Disease 102: 2129-2135). Grapevine leafroll disease Methodology The objective of this project was to examine if rogueing virus-infected vines could reduce the incidence of GLD and GRBD in vineyards. The spread of GLD was monitored in three vineyard blocks planted with cv. Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) in two separate appellations. Initial tests indicated the presence of GLRaV-3 in symptomatic vines. N Fig. 3: Effect of rogueing on GLD incidence in a CS block planted in spring 2013 with a compromised planting stock. 2015 11.88% 2016 1.05% 2017 0.29% 2018 0.46% 2019 0.80% Fig.1: Cabernet Sauvignon vines infected with Grapevine leafroll disease Fig.2: Mapping symptomatic vines and replanting with ‘clean’ vines Year: Incidence: Rogueing in vineyard blocks planted with cuttings sourced from a certified nursery (Fig. 4 & 5) A 13-acre block and a 19-acre block planted, respectively, in 2013 and 2014 with Cabernet Sauvignon sourced from a certified nursery were monitored for five seasons (2015-19). Samples from a select number of symptomatic vines in both blocks tested positive for GLRaV-3 and negative for GRBV. Data on spatial distribution of symptomatic vines collected during each season was shared with the grower to remove symptomatic vines and replant with virus-tested cuttings. In the 13-acre block planted in 2013 (Fig. 4), rogueing symptomatic vines helped to keep GLD incidence at very low levels (<2%) until 2018 season. However, higher incidence was observed in 2019 season, suggesting new infections likely from external sources. Fig. 4: Effect of rogueing on GLD incidence in a CS block planted in 2013 with cuttings from a certified nursery. 2015 2.26% 2016 1.98% 2017 1.92% 2018 1.25% 2019 4.66% Year: Incidence: Grapevine leafroll disease (contd.) In the 19-acre block planted in 2014, rogueing and replanting was implemented during 2015 and 2017. No rogueing was practiced during 2018. GLD incidence was below 2.5% during 2015 and 2018 seasons. However, an uptick in GLD incidence was observed during the 2019 season (Fig. 5). This could be due to the lack of rogueing symptomatic vines as well as new infections likely due to vector-mediated spread from outside sources. These results indicate benefits of rogueing symptomatic vines and replanting with virus-tested cuttings in reducing disease incidence. 2015 1.17% 2016 1.90% 2017 1.65% 2018 2.44% 2019 7.4% Year: Incidence: Grapevine red blotch disease Fig. 5: Effect of rogueing on GLD incidence in a CS block planted in 2014 with cuttings from a certified nursery. We pursued rogueing as a strategy for controlling red blotch disease in vineyards. For this purpose, we have identified a 10-acre vineyard block planted in 2013 with cv. Merlot clone 15. About 15% of vines in this block showed red blotch symptoms. Spatial mapping of symptomatic vines showed random distribution across the entire vineyard block. The symptomatic vines tested positive for GRBV and negative for GLRaV-3. Rogueing followed by replanting showed that the disease incidence was reduced from 15.3% in 2017 to 1.96% in 2018 and 0.42% in 2019. These observations suggest rogueing can be implemented as an effective strategy for controlling red blotch disease. Fig. 6: Effect of rogueing on GRBD incidence 2017 15.26% 2018 1.96% 2019 0.42% Year: Incidence: Conclusions Rogueing of symptomatic vines and replanting with virus- tested replacement vines helped to reduce the incidence of GRBV. In contrast, rogueing had marginal effects on slowing the spread of GLRaV-3. Rogueing helped to reduce GLRaV-3 incidence in some blocks, while the outcomes were less successful in other blocks. Therefore, further research is needed to refine and integrate this approach with other tactics for implementing robust strategies to control GLD. Vineyard blocks newly planted with red-fruited wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars were selected for this study. These blocks were monitored in each season during mid to late September, when symptoms are maximally expressed, for visual identification of symptomatic vines (Fig. 2). Spatial mapping of symptomatic vines in each block was done by plotting individual symptomatic vines in a XY matrix, representing the planting lattice using the row numbers and vine positions as coordinates. The data from individual blocks was shared with respective growers for rogueing symptomatic vines and replanting with ‘clean’ vines. In a 5.5-acre block planted in 2013, 11.88% vines were found showing leafroll symptoms in 2015 season. Samples from symptomatic vines tested positive for GLRaV-3 and negative for GRBV. By rogueing symptomatic vines and replacing with virus-tested cuttings in spring 2016, virus incidence was reduced to 1.05% in fall 2016. The incidence was further reduced to 0.29% in fall 2017 by rogueing leftover symptomatic vines and replanting. However, a few vines showed new infections in 2018 and 2019, likely due to the introduction of GLRaV-3 by insect vectors. Nevertheless, the disease incidence remained below 1%, underscoring the beneficial effect of rogueing for controlling GLD. Rogueing in a vineyard block planted with compromised cuttings sourced from a grower vineyard (Fig. 3) Studies in commercial vineyards have shown that GLRaV-3 and GRBV significantly affect both fruit yield and grape quality. GLRaV-3 can spread within and between vineyards by mealybugs and scale insects. In contrast, no vine-to-vine spread of GRBV was observed so far in WA vineyards. E W N S N S W E N S W E N S W E Acknowledgements: The project was funded, in part, by the WSU Agricultural Research Center, the Wine Research Advisory Committee, the Washington Wine Commission, the Washington State Grape and Wine Research Program, WSDA-Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (Project # K1765), and Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration.

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jun-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rogueing symptomatic vines for controlling viral diseases ... · symptomatic vines tested positive for GLRaV-3 and negative for GRBV. By rogueing symptomatic vines and replacing with

Major Viral Diseases

Rogueing symptomatic vines for controlling viral diseases in vineyardsSridhar Jarugula, Raphael Adegbola, Arunabha Mitra, Noma Chingandu, Chandra Thammina, Prashant Swamy,

Basavaraj Bagewadi and Naidu RayapatiDepartment of Plant Pathology, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350

Viral diseases are one of the most serious impediments to the sustainability of Washington’s grape and wine industry. Therefore, management of viral diseases is essential for healthy vineyards. Rogueing or removal of symptomatic plants is one of the commonly used cultural practices for controlling viral diseases in crops. Grapevine leafroll (GLD) and red blotch (GRBD) are the two economically important viral diseases in Washington State vineyards (Fig. 1). GLD is caused by Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) and GRBD is caused by Grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV). Our research has consistently shown that GLRaV-3 is by far the most insidious and widely distributed than GRBV in Washington vineyards (Adiputra et al., 2018. Plant Disease 102: 2129-2135).

Grapevine leafroll disease

Methodology

The objective of this project was to examine if rogueing virus-infected vines could reduce the incidence of

GLD and GRBD in vineyards.

The spread of GLD was monitored in three vineyard blocks planted with cv. Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) in two separate appellations. Initial tests indicated the presence of GLRaV-3 in symptomatic vines.

NFig. 3: Effect of rogueing on GLD incidence in a CS block planted in spring 2013 with a compromised planting stock.

201511.88%

20161.05%

20170.29%

20180.46%

20190.80%

Fig.1: Cabernet Sauvignon vines infected with Grapevine leafroll disease

Fig.2: Mapping symptomatic vines and replanting with ‘clean’ vines

Year:Incidence:

Rogueing in vineyard blocks planted with cuttings sourced from a certified nursery (Fig. 4 & 5)

A 13-acre block and a 19-acre block planted, respectively, in 2013 and 2014 with Cabernet Sauvignon sourced from a certified nursery were monitored for five seasons (2015-19). Samples from a select number of symptomatic vines in both blocks tested positive for GLRaV-3 and negative for GRBV. Data on spatial distribution of symptomatic vines collected during each season was shared with the grower to remove symptomatic vines and replant with virus-tested cuttings. In the 13-acre block planted in 2013 (Fig. 4), rogueing symptomatic vines helped to keep GLD incidence at very low levels (<2%) until 2018 season. However, higher incidence was observed in 2019 season, suggesting new infections likely from external sources.

Fig. 4: Effect of rogueing on GLD incidence in a CS block planted in 2013 with cuttings from a certified nursery.

20152.26%

20161.98%

20171.92%

20181.25%

20194.66%

Year:Incidence:

Grapevine leafroll disease (contd.)

In the 19-acre block planted in 2014, rogueing and replanting was implemented during 2015 and 2017. No rogueing was practiced during 2018. GLD incidence was below 2.5% during 2015 and 2018 seasons. However, an uptick in GLD incidence was observed during the 2019 season (Fig. 5). This could be due to the lack of rogueing symptomatic vines as well as new infections likely due to vector-mediated spread from outside sources. These results indicate benefits of rogueing symptomatic vines and replanting with virus-tested cuttings in reducing disease incidence.

20151.17%

20161.90%

20171.65%

20182.44%

20197.4%

Year:Incidence:

Grapevine red blotch disease

Fig. 5: Effect of rogueing on GLD incidence in a CS block planted in 2014 with cuttings from a certified nursery.

We pursued rogueing as a strategy for controlling red blotch disease in vineyards. For this purpose, we have identified a 10-acre vineyard block planted in 2013 with cv. Merlot clone 15. About 15% of vines in this block showed red blotch symptoms. Spatial mapping of symptomatic vines showed random distribution across the entire vineyard block. The symptomatic vines tested positive for GRBV and negative for GLRaV-3. Rogueing followed by replanting showed that the disease incidence was reduced from 15.3% in 2017 to 1.96% in 2018 and 0.42% in 2019. These observations suggest rogueing can be implemented as an effective strategy for controlling red blotch disease.

Fig. 6: Effect of rogueing on GRBD incidence

201715.26%

20181.96%

20190.42%

Year:Incidence:

ConclusionsRogueing of symptomatic vines and replanting with virus-

tested replacement vines helped to reduce the incidence of GRBV. In contrast, rogueing had marginal effects on slowing the spread of GLRaV-3. Rogueing helped to reduce GLRaV-3

incidence in some blocks, while the outcomes were less successful in other blocks. Therefore, further research is needed to refine and integrate this approach with other

tactics for implementing robust strategies to control GLD.

• Vineyard blocks newly planted with red-fruited wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars were selected for this study. These blocks were monitored in each season during mid to late September, when symptoms are maximally expressed, for visual identification of symptomatic vines (Fig. 2).

• Spatial mapping of symptomatic vines in each block was done by plotting individual symptomatic vines in a XY matrix, representing the planting lattice using the row numbers and vine positions as coordinates.

• The data from individual blocks was shared with respective growers for rogueing symptomatic vines and replanting with ‘clean’ vines.

In a 5.5-acre block planted in 2013, 11.88% vines were found showing leafroll symptoms in 2015 season. Samples from symptomatic vines tested positive for GLRaV-3 and negative for GRBV. By rogueing symptomatic vines and replacing with virus-tested cuttings in spring 2016, virus incidence was reduced to 1.05% in fall 2016. The incidence was further reduced to 0.29% in fall 2017 by rogueing leftover symptomatic vines and replanting. However, a few vines showed new infections in 2018 and 2019, likely due to the introduction of GLRaV-3 by insect vectors. Nevertheless, the disease incidence remained below 1%, underscoring the beneficial effect of rogueing for controlling GLD.

Rogueing in a vineyard block planted with compromised cuttings sourced from a grower vineyard (Fig. 3)

Studies in commercial vineyards have shown that GLRaV-3 and GRBV significantly affect both fruit yield and grape quality. GLRaV-3 can spread within and between vineyards by mealybugs and scale insects. In contrast, no vine-to-vine spread of GRBV was observed so far in WA vineyards.

E

W

N S

N

S

W E

N

S

W E

N

S

W E

Acknowledgements: The project was funded, in part, by the WSU Agricultural Research Center, the Wine Research Advisory Committee, the Washington Wine Commission, the Washington State Grape and Wine Research Program, WSDA-Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (Project # K1765), and Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration.