Part II: Judicial Misconduct Exposed!

By Tiwanda 'Ne Ne' Lovelace

Copyright © 2016 Created and Written by Tiwanda ‘Ne Ne’ Lovelace

–

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by electronic or mechanical means, including information n storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages. Library of Congress: Case No. 1-1114328891 Literary Work

ISBN 978-0-98962255-4 First Edition, Perfect Bound Revised February 17, 2016 Released February 20, 2016

The court system has been placed under the microscope from the view of the everyday citizen to reveal how it really works for the less fortunate. This title discusses judicial misconduct and ‘obstruction of justice’ while demonstrating how some have been made invisible by a corrupt legal system.

This book demonstrates how some individuals are deliberately oppressed and denied rights by those that are in positions to manipulate the courts to ensure injustice continues. Therefore, by refusing to acknowledge blatant misconduct…they enslave individuals by using their money, power and positions to deprive rights that should be guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America.

The documentation provided along with my personal experiences shared in this book should demonstrate the lengths that those who abuse their positions to strip others publicly by using illegal tactics and deception. For questions and more information, please contact us at: https://requestforlegalhelp.com.

Library of Congress:

1. ISBN 978-0-9896225-6-1 First Edition, Perfect Bound December 31, 2013Released 01-04-2014/ Library of Congress: Case No. 1-1114328891 LiteraryWork

2. Music Business: It’s a Dirty Game! Autobiography of Tiwanda Gail ‘Ne Ne’Lovelace Case No. 1-883369881 January 29, 2013 & 1-960108361 July 6, 2013Literary Work

3. Music, Murder and Mayhem - A True Story February 6, 2013, Literary Work

Published in the United States by Seven West Productions, P. O. Box 400001 Las Vegas, Nevada 89140 2013

Immediately below is a copy of the Complaint of Judicial Misconduct recently filed in 2015 (which includes background summary. I appreciate your discretion in protecting confidential information. I am seeking legal representation with regards to my allegations involving DeKalb County, the courts in the Northern District of GA and the COA-Court of Appeals.

I have reached out to many legal aid organizations but in spite of ‘obstruction’ and many other unethical behaviors…some have attempted to use the statutes of limitations to dissuade even though the laws clearly state ‘statutes of limitations are not applicable. I may not be an attorney but like many others, I love reading and studying case laws and the constitutional laws, etc.

I am constantly misrepresented by those who are in a position to thwart justice and I do not have to tell you how people rally against you when suing governmental agencies; such as, the police. The first response commonly used is, “It’s YOUR tax dollars…” No one realizes that this only supports and condone continued civil rights violations.

Again, I recognize that this is an extremely difficult task but I have faith that this can be remedied. The following pages are actual copies of a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct which clearly demonstrates how the courts own rules and procedures are misused, ignored and/or are

As we begin to review the many supporting documentation provided in this publication, the first thing that should be addressed is the Rules and Procedures that are supposed to govern the judicial process.

In the previous publication, INVISIBLE: Living in America Without Rights we reviewed the basics regarding the filing of the lawsuit or Complaint.

The following page provides information regarding the Courts Clerks duties when accepting Complaints of Judicial Misconduct in accordance the Rules for Judicial-Conduct with Eleventh Circuit Judicial Conduct and Disability Rules

Keep in mind that the reason for the filing of the COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT was due to this same kind of questionable behavior involving manipulating motions and filings; such as, a ‘switch-a-roo' tactics. Courts/Clerks editing filings, withholding and ignoring laws, rules and procedures facilitates the deprivation of rights through obstruction of justice.

8. Action by Clerk

(a) Receipt of Complaint. Upon receiving a complaint againsta judge filed under Rule 5 or 6, the circuit clerk mustopen a file, assign a docket number according to auniform numbering scheme promulgated by the JudicialConference Committee on Judicial Conduct andDisability, and acknowledge the complaint's receipt.

(b) Distribution of Copies. The clerk must promptly sendcopies of a complaint filed under Rule 6 to the chief judgeor the judge authorized to act as chief judge under Rule25(1), and copies of complaints filed under Rule 5 or 6 toeach subject judge. The clerk must retain the originalcomplaint. Any further distribution should be as providedby local rule.

(c) Complaints Against Non-covered Persons. If the clerkreceives a complaint about a person not holding an officedescribed in Rule 4, the clerk must not accept thecomplaint for filing under these Rules.

(d) Receipt of Complaint about a Judge and Another Non-covered Person. If a complaint is received about a judgedescribed in Rule 4 and a person not holding an officedescribed in Rule 4, the clerk must accept the complaintfor filing under these Rules only with regard to the judgeand must inform the complainant of the limitation.

Rules for Judicial-Conduct

Note: This is a copy of the first page of the Complaint of Judicial Misconduct that was submitted on August 11, 2015. The red arrows and text highlighted is used to identify specific information.

Note: This is a copy of the first page of the Complaint of Judicial Misconduct that was EDITED by Courts/Clerks to reflect a receipt date of August 12, 2015. The red/orange arrows and text highlighted are used to identify specific information.

This Document should have been stamped and assigned a docket # at time of submission, per Court Rules…

Instead, the date was changed from August 11, 2015 to August 12, 2015. The notation at the bottom of this filing which alerted Courts of attachments, was edited out and/or removed.

This filing had 69+ pages of supporting documentation. Each labeled as COM, numbered and listed as attachments.

These filing were bound; however, Courts clerk requested unbound copy (as shown in email request).

COA CLERK DID NOT FOLLOW PROCEDURE because there was no docket number assigned and the stamp used was not initialed. In fact, when I question him about the Docket #…he gave me the copy of the first page that was stamped with different stamp and it was initialed.

When I met with Kennerly to give him the requested unbound copy, he provided me with a copy of stamped C.O.M. with a Docket # (finally). it was nothing like the copy that the courts initially returned.

I have a video of incident which clearly shows clerk’s misconduct when receiving Judicial Complaint of Misconduct. Afterward, the executive clerk requested unbound copies although video shows that I submitted (4) bound copies. I provided 82 pages which included clear, undeniable proof of misconduct but the ruling stated that I did not provide supporting documentation.

When I requested a cover sheet because the initial clerk only provided a generic date stamp, the executive clerk gave me a copy which was completely different from the generic stamp and it included the case docket number but it did not reflect that it came from my bound copies. The ruling still never addresses that the courts ignored clerks were supposed to serve Defendants.

Keep in mind that the reason for the filing of the COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT was due to this same kind of behavior involving manipulating motions and filings; such as, a ‘switch-a-roo,' Clerks editing filings, withholding and obstruction.

(a) Receipt of Complaint. Upon receiving a complaintagainst a judge filed under Rule 5 or 6, the circuit clerkmust open a file, assign a docket number according to auniform numbering scheme promulgated by theJudicial Conference Committee on Judicial Conductand Disability, and acknowledge the complaint'sreceipt.

8. Action by Clerk

Rules for Judicial-Conduct

Note: This image confirms that a healthy stack of supporting documentation was submitted; however, the Courts ruling response by alleging that there was no evidence in support of claims. '...without more' as if there was only accusations.

I have a video which summarizes and provide further insight as to what was submitted along with the COM @ https://youtu.be/G-O8tijc5mg

* The video was recorded August 10, 2015 but because I required an additional stamped copy of COM for my records. I returned the following day with multiple BOUND copies for all parties in accordance with Courts Rules.

------------------------

------

The following page confirms that Plaintiff was allowed to proceed IFP- In Forma Pauperis.

The Court Rules dictate:

Proceedings IFP - In Forma Pauperis dictate (d) The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in such cases.

Plaintiff submitted all filings to Clerks in triplicate AND referenced this process within filings, motions, etc.

The COM also confirms that Plaintiff had already survived a Frivolity determination and the originally assigned Judge had already ruled that the Defendants were a suable entity. However, the Judges were abruptly switched without cause to another Judge who ignored IFP filing, filings, motions, rules, etc...