sanders hasanohiogis conf
DESCRIPTION
Three Times a Week: Mapping the Transportation of Dialysis Patients in Dayton, Ohio. Presented at Ohio GIS Conference, 2013. Dublin, Ohio. Capstone project for MPA program at Wright State UniversityTRANSCRIPT
Three Times a Week: Mapping the Transportation of Dialysis Patients Dayton, Ohio
Ambreen Hasan
Research Analyst
Lakeland Community College
2013 Ohio GIS Conference
September 11 - 13, 2013 | Columbus Marriott Northwest | Dublin, Ohio
Langdon Sanders
GIS Technician
City of Kettering, OH
Three Times a Week:
Mapping the Transportation of Dialysis Patients in the Greater Dayton Area
Ambreen Hasan and Langdon Sanders
Sponsored by
Ohio GIS Conference, Sept. 13, 2013
• Examine current transportation system for dialysis patients in Montgomery, Miami & Greene co.
• Inform Transit, Medical, and Public communities
– Identify Target Areas, Issues & Challenges
Towards Improving Service, Reducing Cost
Purpose
Research Questions • Where are the patients?
– “Hot Spots” and rideshare possibilities
• How do they travel to dialysis? – Field Observation, Patient Survey
• Are they going to the closest center?
Raw Data to Master Table
Pickup/Dropoff, Provider, Trip_ID . . .
Geocode Origin & Destination Addresses
Mapping Analysis
via unique TRIP IDs
Direct Observation Findings
51%
10% 16%
1%
22%
PersonalVehicle
RTA (Projectmobility)
Ambulette(E.M.T.,
America,Medcorps)
GreeneCATS Taxi/Van
How People Travel to Dialysis (n=77)
*Observations done at the two centers located in Dayton *Data includes both arriving and departing vehicles from the center
Selected Survey Results
White 32%
Black / Afro-
Ameri…
Asian 4% Other 2%
Race
29%
20%
2%
6%
41%
2%
drove self / family
Proj. Mob RTA
Reg. RTA bus
Ambulette
TaxiVan paid by Med/Ins
Senior Center
How Patients Travel to Dialysis
74% 53%
16%
Dr. Rec Convenient Dist. Customer Serv.
Top 3 Reasons for Choosing the Current Center
Geocoded points by transit provider
Where are the Patients?
Created a density surface using Spatial Analyst
Notes:
• We used kernel density
• Pick a search radius
– play with results
• Cell size det. ‘smoothness’
• Lowest color empty
Where are the ‘hotspots’?
Areas with high percentages of households without a vehicle
Accessibility to Personal Transport
Density of Patients & Public Bus Routes
Accessibility to Public Transport
• Geocoded PickUp & DropOff Addresses, dialysis centers
• XY to Line tool
– Org. Dest.
– Kept TRIP_ID
• Distance Traveled
• Nearest Center
• Ratio of distance
– Actual / Closest
• Results – 2/ 2 = 1.000
– Or 2.5/ 2 = 1.25
Travel Efficiency: Closest Dialysis?
• 40% not going to nearest center – Weighted by GDRTA with 111 trips
88%
86%
53%
45%
12%
14%
47%
55%
Greene CATS (n=17)
MCPT (n=51)
Anton's Transportation(n=30)
Greater Dayton RTA(n=111)
Percent Travelling to Nearest Center by Provider (n=210)
Yes No
Nearest Center Results
RideShare Analysis: Day & Provider
RideShare Analysis: Day & Provider
RideShare Analysis: Day & Provider
RideShare Analysis: Day & Provider
Where do we go from here?
Patients
• Educate & empower of options available (such as where other centers are located & rideshare opportunities)
Transit Providers
• Further study
• Show mismatch of service duplication and inefficiencies
• Avoid trip duplication
• Promote rideshare
• Talk with other providers
Medical Community
• Work with patients to ID willingness to change
• Explain dialysis center assignment process - include transportation in decision
• ID where changes can/cannot be made
Implications for Decision Makers
• Only part of the system – Data from RTA, Anton’s, Greene CATS, MCPT and
Fairborn Sen. Center.
• Straight lines distance used instead of actual distance. – Easy, does not require network
• Different date ranges of data.
• Surveyed & Observed only two centers – both in Montgomery County
Limitations & Thoughts for Future
Ambreen Hasan
Research Analyst
Lakeland Community College
Langdon Sanders
GIS Technician
City of Kettering
[email protected] (937)296-3209
Thank you.