sap growth strategy

2
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT | DECEMBER 2007  17 www.destinationCRM.com Insight  basically buy-what-you-want type package at a pretty reasonable rate. But he ques- tions the mark et’ s accep tance of an ERP product delivered via SaaS. “W e have yet to see whether or not buyers will really accept a full [SaaS-based] ERP package,” he says. SAP Business ByDesign could add a much-needed credibility boost for SAP in th e on-d eman d mark et. The n ew product “is really a major stake in the ground for SAP in the on-demand space, in the midmarke t, in the model-base d development space, and in the services - oriented architecture space—all four of those converge with this one product,” says Josh G reenbaum, principal at Enter- prise Applications Consulting (EAC). That on-demand market is heating up. SAP must now contend with a field of competitors with much longer histories in deliverin g SaaS functionality, such as on-demand specialists Salesforce.com and NetSu ite, a compan y that has been lauded for its on-demand integrated ERP, CRM, and e-commerce capabilities. SAP’s announcement happened to coin- cide with Dreamforce, Salesforc e.com ’s annual user confer ence, and came just one day after NetSuite announced that man- ufacturer Asahi Kasei Spandex America had replaced SAP R/3 with ERP func- tionality from NetSuite. Greenbaum, howev er , says that SAP is a substantially larger and better-known compan y than NetSuite, putting the onus on NetSuite to retain its market position. He also sees challenges ahead for Sales- force.c om: “One of Salesfor ce.com ’s main problems is it lacks direct out-of-the-box inte grati on wit h the r est of the b ack office, and for compan ies that have to weigh the ch oices of having a full o n- demand suite versus a best-of-breed CRM solution that has to be connected to the back office, the [SAP Business ByD esign] story can be a very compelling one.” But much o f the su cce ss of SAP Busi- ness ByDesign rests with its channel strategy, Greenbaum says. All the great technology in the world won’t work in the midmarket unless you have a strong, very motivated channel bringing [it] in front of the customers . —Coreen Bailor Historically, SAP has shied away from gobbling up large software companies, but by announcing on October 7 its intent to acquire business intelligence (BI) and analytics player Business Objects, the German software giant delivered the biggest indication to date that it has its eye on leveraging a merger-and-acquisition strategy to secure new business. While SAP has made its share of smaller acquisitions, the Business Objects deal—valued at about 4.8 billion euro or $6.8 billion—will, if approved by shareholders, be the largest in SAP’s 35-year history. Products going forward will be designed to enable companies to strengthen decision processes, increase customer value, and create sustainable competi- tive advantage through real-time, multidimensional BI, according to the com- panies. Moreover, the companies believe that customers will gain significant business benefits through the combination of enter- prisewide BI solutions along with embedded analytics in trans- actional applications. Business Objects will operate as a standalone business as part of the SAP Group. “It’s a change in strategy for them,” says Dave Kasabian, a research director at AMR Research. “Business Objects is a market leader in business intelligence and has a very broad client base, bringing a lot of clients to the table for SAP.” However, product overlap on the performance management side of the equation must be ironed out, Kasabian adds. “They’ll have to do some product rationalization around the products that are currently available in that market.” On his blog, Ray Wang, senior analyst for enterprise applications at Forrester Research, described the bid as “a not-so-surprise move to insiders.” Organic growth, according to Wang, is not sufficient to meet SAP’s stated goals. “Despite great success with organic growth, Oracle’ s acquisition strategy is making a dent,” he wrote, referring to Oracle’s dozens of acquisitions since the turn of the century. “Henning Kagermann’s quote from the press release says it all. ‘The acquisition of Business Objects is in keeping with SAP’s stated strat- egy to double our addres sable market by 2010 as announced in 2005,’ said Kager- mann. ‘SAP will accelerate its growth in the business user segment, while complementing the company’s successful organic growth strategy.’ What kind of [other] acquisitions will SAP make to meet this self-imposed target?” Moreover , SAP evaluated Business Objects for more than just BI, according to Wang. “After Oracle’ s takeover of [BI vendor Hyperion Solutions, earlier this year], SAP evaluated the impact to its overall solution-centric ecosystem,” he writes, citing Business Objects’ “strong partner ecosystem.” Wang also noted that “Busi- ness Objects users may be forced onto NetWeaver in the long run.” Dan Sholler, a Gartner vice president, says that the SAP Business ByDesign and SAP–Business Objects announcements have dramatically increased the com- pany’s complexity. However, “having better BI capabilities baked into all of SAP’s products is going to be a benefit,” he says, “but that’s something that will man- ifest itself over the space of several years.” —Coreen Bailor and Marshall Lager A Shift in SAP’s Growth Strategy: Buy Big to Get Bigger The company’s planned acquisition of analytics powerhouse Business Objects represents the largest in company history What kind of other acquisitions will SAP make to meet its self-imposed growth target?

Upload: deepshikha-chauhan

Post on 14-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

7/27/2019 SAP Growth Strategy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sap-growth-strategy 1/2

CUSTOMERRELATIONSHIPMANAGEMENT | DECEMBER 2007 17wwwdestinationCRMcom

Insightbasically buy-what-you-want type package

at a pretty reasonable rate.” But he ques-

tions the market’s acceptance of an ERP

product delivered via SaaS.“We have yet to

see whether or not buyers will really accept

a full [SaaS-based] ERP package,” he says.SAP Business ByDesign could add a

much-needed credibility boost for SAP

in the on-demand market. The new 

product “is really a major stake in the

ground for SAP in the on-demand space,

in the midmarket, in the model-based

development space, and in the services-

oriented architecture space—all four of 

those converge with this one product,”

says Josh Greenbaum,principal at Enter-

prise Applications Consulting (EAC).

That on-demand market is heating up.SAP must now contend with a field of 

competitors with much longer histories

in delivering SaaS functionality, such as

on-demand specialists Salesforce.com

and NetSuite, a company that has been

lauded for its on-demand integrated

ERP, CRM, and e-commerce capabilities.

SAP’s announcement happened to coin-

cide with Dreamforce, Salesforce.com’s

annual user conference,and came just one

day after NetSuite announced that man-

ufacturer Asahi Kasei Spandex America

had replaced SAP R/3 with ERP func-

tionality from NetSuite.

Greenbaum, however, says that SAP is

a substantially larger and better-known

company than NetSuite, putting the onus

on NetSuite to retain its market position.

He also sees challenges ahead for Sales-

force.com:“One of Salesforce.com’s main

problems is it lacks direct out-of-the-box 

integration with the rest of the back 

office, and for companies that have toweigh the choices of having a full on-

demand suite versus a best-of-breed CRM

solution that has to be connected to the

back office, the [SAP Business ByDesign]

story can be a very compelling one.”

But much of the success of SAP Busi-

ness ByDesign rests with its channel

strategy, Greenbaum says. “All the great

technology in the world won’t work in

the midmarket unless you have a strong,

very motivated channel bringing [it] in

front of the customers.” —Coreen Bailor 

Historically, SAP has shied away from gobbling up large

software companies, but by announcing on October 7 its

intent to acquire business intelligence (BI) and analytics

player Business Objects, the German software giant

delivered the biggest indication to date that it has its eye

on leveraging a merger-and-acquisition strategy to

secure new business. While SAP has made its share of 

smaller acquisitions, the Business Objects deal—valued

at about 4.8 billion euro or $6.8 billion—will, if approved

by shareholders, be the largest in SAP’s 35-year history.

Products going forward will be designed to enable companies to strengthen

decision processes, increase customer value, and create sustainable competi-

tive advantage through real-time, multidimensional BI, according to the com-

panies. Moreover, the companies believe that customers will gain

significant business benefits through the combination of enter-

prisewide BI solutions along with embedded analytics in trans-

actional applications. Business Objects will operate as a

standalone business as part of the SAP Group.

“It’s a change in strategy for them,” says Dave Kasabian, a

research director at AMR Research. “Business Objects is a market

leader in business intelligence and has a very broad client base,

bringing a lot of clients to the table for SAP.” However, product overlap on the

performance management side of the equation must be ironed out, Kasabian

adds. “They’ll have to do some product rationalization around the products that

are currently available in that market.”

On his blog, Ray Wang, senior analyst for enterprise applications at Forrester

Research, described the bid as “a not-so-surprise move to insiders.”

Organic growth, according to Wang, is not sufficient to meet SAP’s stated

goals. “Despite great success with organic growth, Oracle’s acquisition strategy

is making a dent,” he wrote, referring to Oracle’s dozens of acquisitions since

the turn of the century. “Henning Kagermann’s quote from the press release says

it all. ‘The acquisition of Business Objects is in keeping with SAP’s stated strat-

egy to double our addressable market by 2010 as announced in 2005,’ said Kager-

mann. ‘SAP will accelerate its growth in the business user segment, while

complementing the company’s successful organic growth strategy.’ What kind

of [other] acquisitions will SAP make to meet this self-imposed target?”

Moreover, SAP evaluated Business Objects for more than just BI, according to

Wang. “After Oracle’s takeover of [BI vendor Hyperion Solutions, earlier this year],

SAP evaluated the impact to its overall solution-centric ecosystem,” he writes,

citing Business Objects’ “strong partner ecosystem.” Wang also noted that “Busi-

ness Objects users may be forced onto NetWeaver in the long run.”

Dan Sholler, a Gartner vice president, says that the SAP Business ByDesign

and SAP–Business Objects announcements have dramatically increased the com-

pany’s complexity. However, “having better BI capabilities baked into all of SAP’s

products is going to be a benefit,” he says, “but that’s something that will man-

ifest itself over the space of several years.” —Coreen Bailor and Marshall Lager 

A Shift in SAP’s Growth Strategy:Buy Big to Get BiggerThe company’s planned acquisition of analytics powerhouse

Business Objects represents the largest in company history 

What kind of oth

acquisitions will

SAP make to mee

its self-imposed

growth target?

7/27/2019 SAP Growth Strategy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sap-growth-strategy 2/2