sap growth strategy
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 SAP Growth Strategy
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sap-growth-strategy 1/2
CUSTOMERRELATIONSHIPMANAGEMENT | DECEMBER 2007 17wwwdestinationCRMcom
Insightbasically buy-what-you-want type package
at a pretty reasonable rate.” But he ques-
tions the market’s acceptance of an ERP
product delivered via SaaS.“We have yet to
see whether or not buyers will really accept
a full [SaaS-based] ERP package,” he says.SAP Business ByDesign could add a
much-needed credibility boost for SAP
in the on-demand market. The new
product “is really a major stake in the
ground for SAP in the on-demand space,
in the midmarket, in the model-based
development space, and in the services-
oriented architecture space—all four of
those converge with this one product,”
says Josh Greenbaum,principal at Enter-
prise Applications Consulting (EAC).
That on-demand market is heating up.SAP must now contend with a field of
competitors with much longer histories
in delivering SaaS functionality, such as
on-demand specialists Salesforce.com
and NetSuite, a company that has been
lauded for its on-demand integrated
ERP, CRM, and e-commerce capabilities.
SAP’s announcement happened to coin-
cide with Dreamforce, Salesforce.com’s
annual user conference,and came just one
day after NetSuite announced that man-
ufacturer Asahi Kasei Spandex America
had replaced SAP R/3 with ERP func-
tionality from NetSuite.
Greenbaum, however, says that SAP is
a substantially larger and better-known
company than NetSuite, putting the onus
on NetSuite to retain its market position.
He also sees challenges ahead for Sales-
force.com:“One of Salesforce.com’s main
problems is it lacks direct out-of-the-box
integration with the rest of the back
office, and for companies that have toweigh the choices of having a full on-
demand suite versus a best-of-breed CRM
solution that has to be connected to the
back office, the [SAP Business ByDesign]
story can be a very compelling one.”
But much of the success of SAP Busi-
ness ByDesign rests with its channel
strategy, Greenbaum says. “All the great
technology in the world won’t work in
the midmarket unless you have a strong,
very motivated channel bringing [it] in
front of the customers.” —Coreen Bailor
Historically, SAP has shied away from gobbling up large
software companies, but by announcing on October 7 its
intent to acquire business intelligence (BI) and analytics
player Business Objects, the German software giant
delivered the biggest indication to date that it has its eye
on leveraging a merger-and-acquisition strategy to
secure new business. While SAP has made its share of
smaller acquisitions, the Business Objects deal—valued
at about 4.8 billion euro or $6.8 billion—will, if approved
by shareholders, be the largest in SAP’s 35-year history.
Products going forward will be designed to enable companies to strengthen
decision processes, increase customer value, and create sustainable competi-
tive advantage through real-time, multidimensional BI, according to the com-
panies. Moreover, the companies believe that customers will gain
significant business benefits through the combination of enter-
prisewide BI solutions along with embedded analytics in trans-
actional applications. Business Objects will operate as a
standalone business as part of the SAP Group.
“It’s a change in strategy for them,” says Dave Kasabian, a
research director at AMR Research. “Business Objects is a market
leader in business intelligence and has a very broad client base,
bringing a lot of clients to the table for SAP.” However, product overlap on the
performance management side of the equation must be ironed out, Kasabian
adds. “They’ll have to do some product rationalization around the products that
are currently available in that market.”
On his blog, Ray Wang, senior analyst for enterprise applications at Forrester
Research, described the bid as “a not-so-surprise move to insiders.”
Organic growth, according to Wang, is not sufficient to meet SAP’s stated
goals. “Despite great success with organic growth, Oracle’s acquisition strategy
is making a dent,” he wrote, referring to Oracle’s dozens of acquisitions since
the turn of the century. “Henning Kagermann’s quote from the press release says
it all. ‘The acquisition of Business Objects is in keeping with SAP’s stated strat-
egy to double our addressable market by 2010 as announced in 2005,’ said Kager-
mann. ‘SAP will accelerate its growth in the business user segment, while
complementing the company’s successful organic growth strategy.’ What kind
of [other] acquisitions will SAP make to meet this self-imposed target?”
Moreover, SAP evaluated Business Objects for more than just BI, according to
Wang. “After Oracle’s takeover of [BI vendor Hyperion Solutions, earlier this year],
SAP evaluated the impact to its overall solution-centric ecosystem,” he writes,
citing Business Objects’ “strong partner ecosystem.” Wang also noted that “Busi-
ness Objects users may be forced onto NetWeaver in the long run.”
Dan Sholler, a Gartner vice president, says that the SAP Business ByDesign
and SAP–Business Objects announcements have dramatically increased the com-
pany’s complexity. However, “having better BI capabilities baked into all of SAP’s
products is going to be a benefit,” he says, “but that’s something that will man-
ifest itself over the space of several years.” —Coreen Bailor and Marshall Lager
A Shift in SAP’s Growth Strategy:Buy Big to Get BiggerThe company’s planned acquisition of analytics powerhouse
Business Objects represents the largest in company history
What kind of oth
acquisitions will
SAP make to mee
its self-imposed
growth target?