sba yesterday & today: current view of sba in advanced
TRANSCRIPT
SBA Yesterday & Today:
Current View of SBA inAdvanced Systems Engineering
andSystem-of-Systems
Environment
Dr. Judith Dahmann
• SBA concepts have been a topic of interest for several years– Where are we in implementing these concepts in today’s
systems acquisitions?
• Growing emphasis on Network Centric Warfare, CoalitionOperation and Systems of Systems– How do SBA concepts support tomorrow’s acquisition
environments?
“A concept which envisions greater and more integrated use of modeling and simulationin the acquisition process. DoDand industry would be enabled by robust, collaborative use ofsimulation technology that is integrated across acquisitionprograms and phases.”
November 1998
Simulation-Based Acquisition Defined
OriginsNeed for More Cost Effective Acquisition Process
• Declining defense budgets and changing force structure– Modernization/Transformation versus Recapitalization– 1995 Vice President’s National Performance Review (NPR) -- 25%
reduction in delivery time for new systems– Department of Defense (DoD) stretch of NPR goal to 50% reduction, plus
reduction in Total Ownership Costs
• Cost-performance consideration allow routine use of advancedIT, modeling and simulation tools– Defense Systems Affordability Council recognizes M&S potential
SBA BenefitsRisk Reduction
• Continuous evaluation of system development
• Rapid evaluation of concept design
• Reduce and delay need for physical prototype
• Facilitate continuous user participation indevelopment process
• Efficient development/evaluation ofmanufacturing plans
• Reuse of system software and hardware intraining simulators
M&S Use in the Army Acquisition Process, Dr Herbert K. Fallin, Jr; 1997
Original Goals
• Substantially reduce the time, resources and riskassociated with the entire acquisition process
• Increase the quality, military worth and supportability offielded systems, while reducing their total ownership coststhroughout the total life cycle
• Enable Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD)across the entire acquisition life cycle.
1998 SBA Roadmap
• Joint SBA task force,including government andindustry, identified cultural,process, and technicalelements
• Identified actions needed toimplement new approach tosystems acquisitionefficiently, expeditiously, andnon-intrusively
Key Ideas
• Shared system or product description– a shared, definitive source of data describing the system which evolves as the system
matures and serves as a common reference for multiple disciplines through systemdevelopment life cycle
• Multiple concurrent views and assessments of the system– based on shared system descriptive data allowing for consideration of more options, and
their implications, at each stage of the development and acquisition process
• Early and continuous use of simulation– in lieu of hardware prototyping and live test; by representing as many aspects of a systems
in simulation for as long as possible, reducing costs of development
• Common tools– employed at different stages of the acquisition process and reuse of tools (including
simulations) which have been used by others, reducing cost and time and increasingcredibility since each user doesn't have to do all the tool development for themselves
Joint Strike Fighter
JSF Suite of Models and Simulations (SoM&S)
JSF Strike WarfareCollaborative Environment
(SWCE) Toolset
JSF Engineering & ManufacturingCollaborative Environment
(EMCE) Toolset
SWCE SoM&S EMCE SoM&S
JSF Distributed ProductDescription (DPD)
JSF Resource Access System (RAS)
Databases Databases
Authoritative SystemsData Base (ASDB)
Scenarios
MSDBMSDB
Scenarios
Geometric DataNon-geometric DataAnalysis ResultsBehavioral Data
Wargame models(e.g., MARS)
Other models
Hardware inthe loop
MARVEDS
Embedded SW
Engineeringanalysis models(e.g., ASAP, RTS)
Physical models & tests
DDXX
Aerial Common Sensor
Engineering Analysis/
ACS Virtual Prototype
Engineering Analysis/
ACS Virtual Prototype
Operational AnalysisSynthetic
Environment
Operational AnalysisSynthetic
Environment
Total Ownership Cost Model
Analysis
Total Ownership Cost Model
Analysis5/10/00 835GR.53.06
Operational Training
Synthetic Environment
Operational Training
Synthetic Environment
Spiral Development Loops
Army Future Combat System
Other Users (Army, Navy, Air Force, Joint, etc.)
Integrated Data Environment (Windchill™ based)
FCS Distributed Product Description (DPD)Shared Segment
FCS Army/Industry Resource Repository (FAIRR)
Scenario Databases
EnvironmentDatabases
Red System Data/Models
Blue System Data/Models
FCS PM Documents
Government LedFuture Combat Collaborative
Environment (FCCE)
FCS
M&
S U
pgra
des
FCS Advanced Collaborative EnvironmentLSI Led
Design/Engineering/Manufacturing Collaborative Environment (DEMCE)
FCS
M&
S U
pgra
des
Archived M&S
•Test, Evaluation, Analysis, Experimentation, Demonstration• Develop/refine/illuminate concepts, doctrine, TTP• View operational & force effectiveness parameters • Training
Management and Collaborative Tools
LSI Tools
Gov’t Tools
Gov’tPrivate
• Computer Aided Systems Engineering • Computer Aided Design• Computer Aided Manufacturing• Virtual System Assessment• Visualization• Design/Engineering Review
LSI Private
Gov’tPrivate
LSI Private
Interfaces
Technology Adoption Life Cycle
Innovators Early Adopters
EarlyMajority
LateMajority
Laggards
Where are we today?
Boeing 777?JSF?
SBA Roadmap?
…probably further to the left than we would like to think…..
DDXX?FCS?
NDIA SBA Conference May 2001 Findings
• Progress has be made• Programs/Services are creating the
systems engineering environments fortheir specific applications
• Industry investing for their owncompetitive advantage
• However….• Limited attention to system-wide issues• Ongoing developments will not ‘work
together’ across systems throughout thelifecycle to create the needed leverage
• Many needed components are availablefrom ongoing efforts, but these are notdesigned to be reused, there is duplication ofefforts and there are missing elements
‘System of Systems’ Pose New Challenges
• Systems of systems pose new challenges– For operations– …. and for development
• To address these challenges, common environments whichcan be used across systems are needed
• In each of the Services, and at the DOD level, new initiativesare being created to address the SOS development issues
• These new initiatives provide broader and more extensibleadvanced systems engineering environments to supportfuture system development
Air Force Joint Synthetic Battlespace
Today: Unable to Fully Understand
Operational Impacts in aHeavily VegetatedEnvironment
--Camouflage, Hyper-spectral,…
Future: Able to Understand
Operational Impacts in allEnvironments
Government Sites
Contractor Sites
ACQUISITIONS&T, R&D, T&E
JNTF(SWC)
IWC
SMC
OFFUTT AFB (RJ MT)
AFC2TIGFt Hood (CCTT)
TACCSFTACCSF
AFRL Mesa56 FW
RJ19 SOS
NCAOC
Bell
Today: Unable to Fully Understand
System of Systems andEnvironmental Impacts
Future: Simulations Readily Available
to Assess SystemComplexities
A Common ArchitectureThat:
-Represents the NaturalEnvironment Realistically
-Physics Based Sensor Models
-Allows Integration of LegacySimulations
Joint Synthetic BattlespaceWARFIGHTER
Requirements,
Training &
Rehearsal
Army Joint Virtual Battlespace
SMART(Simulation & Modeling for Acquisition,
Requirements and Training)……Tool To Support The Objective Force and
Future Combat System
JVB 04-19a
NTM
Global Hawk
JSTARS
Carrier
ACS
Comanche
M1A2
M577
Joint Environment
Army Environment
JointStrike
Fighter
Command andControl
FCS Network Centric
JVB Design Includes:• Joint Forces
• Legacy Forces
• Objective Force
• Future Combat Systems
- C3
- ISR
- Robots
- New Weapons
• Dynamic Weather
• Dynamic Terrain
• High Fidelity Terrain
• Certified Data
Navy Collaborative Engineering Environment
RequirementDocuments
RequirementAnalysis ToolMEMO
SRDMNSORD
DOORS
StructuredRequirements
FunctionAnalysis Tool
CORE
Function
ModelFuncti
onModel
FunctionInformation
FunctionBaselines
Interchange(Server)
ProjectRepository
SystemsSpec
PhysicalImplementation
Information
ResourceConstraint
InterchangeClient
ArchitectureRepresentation
RationalRoseDIAD
JMAAT
OperationalViewSystem
ViewTechnical
View
ArchitectureInformation
Experiment DataSystem Data
InterfaceData
LSSEAnalysis
COPATRABRCA
TRIMSM&S
COST MODELSHSI
CAD/CAM
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant
• JDEP will build interoperableforces by providing a tool for
• Developers to engineerinteroperability into theirsystems
• Testers to test and evaluateinteroperability among systems
• War fighters to assessoperational capabilities of forces
• Single Integrated Air Picture(SIAP) Systems Engineer
• Pilot development of systems ofsystems engineeringenvironment for the DOD
JDEPJDEP2002/32002/3
AWACS30/35 w/RSIP
Boeing Seattle
AEGISShips
B/L 5.3.7.2NSWC DD
ATRC/DOC
PATRIOTPDB 5
Huntsville
E-2 ESTELLE PAX River
TPS-59MCTSSA
ScenarioFederationManager
DataCollector/
Viewer
AWACS TPS-59Patriot E2 AEGIS
Interoperable Systems of Systems Require Interoperable Development Environments
Army JVB
Navy CEE
AF JSB SharedSystem of Systems
DevelopmentCapability
JDEP
As with interoperable war fighting capabilities, Service and Jointdevelopment capabilities must work together to create the needed
system of systems development and engineering environment
Coalition Partners
Challenges
• Challenges of advanced systems of systems engineeringenvironments parallel those of interoperable operational systems ofsystems
• Cooperation among Services and DOD communities to create needcomponents
• Need ways to continue to identify and address technical and policyareas– Key interfaces and common standards– Opportunities for shared developments– Building components for reuse and sharing– Routine application of shared engineering capabilities throughout the
system of systems life cycle
Future VisionFuture Vision
Simulation-supported system of system engineering environmentswill develop hand-in-hand with mission area capabilities
20032003TodayToday
Sys ASys A
Sys XSys X
Sys DSys D
Sys BSys B
Sys CSys C
Sys YSys Y
Joint StaffJoint StaffMission Areas (MA)Mission Areas (MA)
“To Be”“To Be”
- Precision Engagement- Deployment/Redeployment- Dominant Maneuver- Strategic Deterrence- Overseas Presence &
Force Projection- Special Operations- Joint C2- Focused Logistics- Information Superiority- Multinational Ops &
Interagency Coordination- Full Dimensional Protection
Mission FocusMission FocusSystem FocusSystem Focus
Sys ASys A
Sys XSys X
Sys DSys D
Sys BSys B
Sys CSys CSys YSys Y
Sys ASys ASys BSys BSys DSys D
JointJointC2C2 JointJoint
C2C2
System of System Engineering Environments
Summary
• Concepts of simulation support to acquisition and development arekey to advanced engineering environments
• Early emphasis on individual systems and improved efficiency
• Future direction toward enabling systems of systems development,test and war fighter assessment
• Interoperable systems of systems to support joint war fighting requiresshared system of system engineering environments