selected trend data on disciplines: fall 2004 to fall 2008fall 2004 to fall 2008, is displayed for...

Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2004 to Fall 2008

Research Report No. 22-08

Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College

October 2008

OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, PLANNING, AND ASSESSMENT

NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

The purpose of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment is to conduct analytical studies and provide information in support of institutional planning, policy formulation and decision making. In addition, the office provides leadership and support in research related activities to members of the NOVA community engaged in planning and evaluating the institution’s success in accomplishing its mission.

ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, PLANNING, AND ASSESSMENT

Dr. George E. Gabriel

STAFF MEMBERS

Margret Chang

Karen Clarke-Fuhs

Margaret Frankel

Tiffanie Johnson

Marie-Teresa Rangel

Jennifer Roberts

Vijayalakshmi Sampath

Varalakshmi Sontam

4001 Wakefield Chapel Road Annandale, VA 22003-3796

(703) 323-3129 www.nvcc.edu/oir

http://www.nv.cc.va.us/oir�

i

Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2004 to Fall 2008

Table of Contents Page Explanatory Notes for Tables 1 through 14 ................................................................................................................... 1

Tables 1C and 1D present the second scenario where there are 15 new positions available for distribution, and 15%

of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion.

The difference between Table 1C and Table 1D is while Table 1C includes MEC in all the calculations, MEC is

removed from the allocation model in Table 1D. .......................................................................................................... 4

Table 1A: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 .................................................................................. 5

Based on 7 New Positions and 10% Presidential Discretion ......................................................................................... 5

Table 1B: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 ................................................................................... 6

Final Allocation with ME Adjustment ........................................................................................................................... 6

Based on 7 New Positions and 10% Presidential Discretion ......................................................................................... 6

8 Due to a special allocation to the Medical Education Campus, calculations for the MEC columns 11, 12, and 13

are not given. ................................................................................................................................................................. 6

Table 1C: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 ................................................................................... 7

Based on 15 New Positions and 15% Presidential Discretion ....................................................................................... 7

Table 1D: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 .................................................................................. 8

Final Allocation with ME Adjustment ........................................................................................................................... 8


8 Due to a special allocation to the Medical Education Campus, calculations for the MEC columns 11, 12, and 13

are not given. ................................................................................................................................................................. 8

Table 2 shows the campus size in terms of FTES. It also shows the proportion of college FTES contributed by each

campus for Fall 2007. .................................................................................................................................................... 9

Table 2: Size of the Campus Based on Fall FTES -- Fall 2007 ..................................................................................... 9

Table 3 gives, by campus and for the college, FTES for Fall 2006, Fall 2007 and Fall 2008. In addition, it shows the

percent change in FTES from Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 and Fall 2007 to Fall 2008. The average percent change over

the two-year period is also shown in the table. .............................................................................................................. 9

Table 3: Growth by Campus -- Fall 2007 and Fall 2008 ............................................................................................... 9

Table 4 shows full-time, part-time, and total teaching credit hours for each campus. In addition, the table gives the

proportion (PT proportion) of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty at each campus. ...................... 10

Table 4: Part-time Faculty Proportion by Campus -- Fall 2008................................................................................... 10

Table 5 presents the campus multiple which is computed from the product of the discipline credits and discipline

ratio and summed for the campus. In addition, the table gives the campus credit hours. The campus ratio

(programmatic mix) is derived by dividing the campus multiple by the campus credit hours. ................................... 10

Table 5: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 .................................................................................................. 10

ii

Table 6B presents the second scenario where there are 15 new positions available for distribution, and 15% of all the

positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. ............ 11

Table 6A: Current Vacant and Available Positions: 2008-09 ..................................................................................... 11


Table 6B: Current Vacant and Available Positions: 2008-09 ..................................................................................... 11

Based on 15 New Positions and 15% Presidential Discretion ..................................................................................... 11

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 ............................................................................................................................ 12

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d).............................................................................................................. 13


Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d).............................................................................................................. 15





Tables 8.AL through 8.WO give FTES information by campus for each discipline. The five-year trend in FTES,

Fall 2004 to Fall 2008, is displayed for each discipline along with the percent change from Fall 2004 to Fall 2008

and the average FTES over the time period. For disciplines that do not have data available for all 5 years, percent

change is not given, however average FTES are based on the available data. The FTES data given for Fall 2008 are

for the middle of the Fall 2008 semester and are therefore not the final figures. ........................................................ 21

Table 8.AL: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 .............................................. 21

Table 8.AN: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ............................................. 23

Table 8.LO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 .............................................. 25

Table 8.MA: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ............................................. 27

Table 8.ME: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ............................................. 29

Table 8.WO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ............................................ 30

Tables 9.AL through 9.WO give the teaching credit hours (TCH) by campus and discipline. The tables show full-

time and part-time faculty teaching credit hours and total faculty teaching credit hours (the sum of full- and part-

time TCH) and the proportion of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty. The tables are sorted from

highest to lowest according to the part-time proportion. The data shown in this table was extracted from the NVCC

Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester. ................................................................. 32

Table 9.AL: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) ................................................... 32

by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 ....................................................................................................................... 32

Table 9.AN: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) .................................................... 34


Table 9.LO: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) .................................................... 36


Table 9.MA: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) ................................................... 38


by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d) ......................................................................................................... 39

ii

Table 9.ME: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) .................................................... 40


Table 9.WO: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) ................................................... 41


Table 10.AL: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ....................................................... 43

Table 10.AN: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ....................................................... 45

Table 10.LO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ....................................................... 47

Table 10.MA: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ...................................................... 49

Table 10.ME: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ...................................................... 51

Table 10.WO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 ...................................................... 52

Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI show, by campus (including ELI) and discipline, student credit hours generated, the

discipline ratio, and the discipline multiple. The discipline multiple is computed by multiplying the credit hours by

the ratio. The credits and the multiples are summed for each campus. The programmatic mix for the campus is

calculated by dividing the total of the discipline multiples by the total of the discipline credit hours. ....................... 54

Table 11.AL: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 .......................................................................................... 54

Table 11.AN: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 ......................................................................................... 56

Table 11.LO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 .......................................................................................... 58

Table 11.MA: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 ......................................................................................... 60

Table 11.ME: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 ......................................................................................... 62

Table 11.WO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 ........................................................................................ 63

Table 11.ELI: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 ......................................................................................... 65

Table 12 compares the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty ratios. ................................................. 67

Table 12: Comparison of Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee Student/Faculty Ratios ........................................... 67

Table 13 shows, by discipline, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) and the new ratio

adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. The table also displays, by discipline and campus, the Appendix M ratio

(old ratio) and the old ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor.......................................................................... 68

Table 13: Student/Faculty Ratio by Discipline -- Comparison of “Old” and “New” Ratios ....................................... 68

Table 14: Course Prefixes and Descriptions ................................................................................................................ 70

The following tables provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for

Fall 2008 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the

CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline is calculated. The FTEF Requirement is calculated by dividing the

actual FTES by the CFR, as shown in column 4 of the table. The tables also give Fall 2008 full-time FTEF in

column 5 and part-time FTEF in column 7. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the

full-time faculty utilized (FTEF). Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle

of the Fall 2008 semester. ............................................................................................................................................ 72

AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by .................................................................................. 72


AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by ................................................................................... 74


ii

LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement ........................................................................................ 76


MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by .................................................................................. 78


MEC: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by ................................................................................ 80

Campus and Discipline – Fall 2008 ............................................................................................................................. 80

WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by .................................................................................. 81


1

Explanatory Notes for Tables 1 through 14 Tables 1A through 1D Tables 1A through 1D demonstrate how faculty positions are allocated to all the campuses. The model takes into account campus size, campus growth, the proportion of part-time faculty at the campus, programmatic mix, and the current vacancy ratio. Based on these factors, full-time faculty positions are allocated to the campuses. Table footnotes provide information on the factors and computations used in the tables. For the current year (2009-10) two scenarios have been anticipated in preparing these tables (1A to 1D). Tables 1A and 1B present the first scenario where there are 7 new positions available for distribution, and 10% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. The difference between Table 1A and Table 1B is while Table 1A includes MEC in all the calculations, MEC is removed from the allocation model in Table 1B. Tables 1C and 1D present the second scenario where there are 15 new positions available for distribution, and 15% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. The difference between Table 1C and Table 1D is while Table 1C includes MEC in all the calculations, MEC is removed from the allocation model in Table 1D. Table 2 Table 2 shows the campus size in terms of FTES. It also shows the proportion of college FTES contributed by each campus for Fall 2007. Table 3 Table 3 gives, by campus and for the college, FTES for Fall 2006, Fall 2007 and Fall 2008. In addition, it shows the percent change in FTES from Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 and Fall 2007 to Fall 2008. The average percent change over the two-year period is also shown in the table. Table 4 Table 4 shows full-time, part-time, and total teaching credit hours for each campus. In addition, the table gives the proportion (PT proportion) of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty at each campus. Table 5 Table 5 presents the campus multiple which is computed from the product of the discipline credits and discipline ratio and summed for the campus. In addition, the table gives the campus credit hours. The campus ratio (programmatic mix) is derived by dividing the campus multiple by the campus credit hours.

2

Tables 6A and 6B Tables 6A and 6B summarize the number of available positions and allocated 9-month teaching positions for 2008-09 based on two scenarios. Table 6A presents the first scenario where there are 7 new positions available for distribution, and 10% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. Table 6B presents the second scenario where there are 15 new positions available for distribution, and 15% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. Tables 7.AL through 7.WO Tables 7.AL through 7.WO provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for Fall 2008 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline is calculated. The FTEF Requirement is calculated by dividing the actual FTES by the CFR, as shown in column 4 of the table. The tables also give Fall 2008 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 and part-time faculty headcount in column 7. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the full-time faculty headcount. Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester. Tables 8.AL through 8.WO Tables 8.AL through 8.WO give FTES information by campus for each discipline. The five-year trend in FTES, Fall 2004 to Fall 2008, is displayed for each discipline along with the percent change from Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 and the average FTES over the time period. For disciplines that do not have data available for all 5 years, percent change is not given, however average FTES are based on the available data. The FTES data given for Fall 2008 are in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester and are therefore not the final figures. Tables 9.AL through 9.WO Tables 9.AL through 9.WO give the teaching credit hours (TCH) by campus and discipline. The tables show full-time and part-time faculty teaching credit hours and total faculty teaching credit hours (the sum of full- and part-time TCH) and the proportion of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty. The tables are sorted from highest to lowest according to the part-time proportion. The data shown in this table was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester. Tables 10.AL through 10.WO Tables 10.AL through 10.WO provide discipline productivity information for each campus. Discipline productivity is expressed as a percentage and is computed by dividing the actual discipline semester ratio of FTES to FTEF by the current funded ratio. Productivity data in the tables are given for five years, however, productivity prior to Fall 2005 is not comparable with productivity for Fall 2005 onward because different ratios were used in the productivity calculation. Prior to Fall 2005, the Appendix M ratio (old ratio) was used. From Fall 2005 onward, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model is used. In Fall 2006, the Base Budget

3

Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) was revised. Due to this revision, the efficiency factor for NOVA was changed from 1.17 in Fall 2005 to 1.103 in Fall 2006. For Fall 2007 and Fall 2008, FTEF data included in Tables 8.AL through 8.WO was obtained through the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester. Adjunct faculty FTEF was calculated according to load. In prior years, FTEF figures came from the “Discipline Performance Statistics Report” produced by the Information Technology department. The FTEF data from this report derived FTEF from faculty load. For Fall 2005, productivity data for the English and Math disciplines is unavailable. Human Resources was unable to provide data that accurately reflects how FTEF for faculty teaching in these disciplines is split between English/Developmental English and Math/Developmental Math. As the developmental components of these two disciplines have different funded ratios from the non-developmental components, information concerning how the FTEF is subdivided is paramount to the calculation of productivity. Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI show, by campus (including ELI) and discipline, student credit hours generated, the discipline ratio, and the discipline multiple. The discipline multiple is computed by multiplying the credit hours by the ratio. The credits and the multiples are summed for each campus. The programmatic mix for the campus is calculated by dividing the total of the discipline multiples by the total of the discipline credit hours. Table 12 Table 12 compares the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty ratios. Table 13 Table 13 shows, by discipline, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) and the new ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. The table also displays, by discipline and campus, the Appendix M ratio (old ratio) and the old ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. Table 14 Table 14 displays discipline prefixes used in this report and gives a description. As five-year trend data are displayed in this report, this table lists disciplines that may have been phased out within the last five years.

4

Tables 1A through 1D Tables 1A through 1D demonstrate how faculty positions are allocated to all the campuses. The model takes into account campus size, campus growth, the proportion of part-time faculty at the campus, programmatic mix, and the current vacancy ratio. Based on these factors, full-time faculty positions are allocated to the campuses. Table footnotes provide information on the factors and computations used in the tables. For the current year (2009-10) two scenarios have been anticipated in preparing these tables (1A to 1D). Tables 1A and 1B present the first scenario where there are 7 new positions available for distribution, and 10% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. The difference between Table 1A and Table 1B is while Table 1A includes MEC in all the calculations, MEC is removed from the allocation model in Table 1B. Tables 1C and 1D present the second scenario where there are 15 new positions available for distribution, and 15% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. The difference between Table 1C and Table 1D is while Table 1C includes MEC in all the calculations, MEC is removed from the allocation model in Table 1D.

5

Table 1A: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09

Based on 7 New Positions and 10% Presidential Discretion

(29 Available Positions) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Size1

Growth (Avg. of Fall 07 &

08)2

(Growth x 20) + 1003

Product (1 & 3)/

100 Percentage

PT4

Product (4 & 5)/

100 Programmatic

Mix5

Inverse of Programmatic

Mix Product (6 & 8)

Vacancy Adjustment6

Product (9 & 10) % Allocation7

Alexandria 22.1 5.1 202 44.6 48.8 21.8 22.8 4.4 95.9 139/129 103.3 21.5 (6) 6.24

Annandale 35.3 5.5 210 74.1 43.5 32.2 23.4 4.3 138.5 176/168 145.1 30.2 (9) 8.76

Loudoun 14.1 9.7 294 41.5 52.5 21.8 23.3 4.3 93.7 65/61 99.8 20.8 (6) 6.03

Manassas 9.9 4.3 186 18.4 48.4 8.9 23.3 4.3 38.3 54/54 38.3 8.0 (2) 2.32

Medical Ed. 3.6 12.9 358 12.9 32.2 4.1 11.6 8.6 35.3 66/66 35.3 7.3 (2) 2.12

Woodbridge 15.0 3.5 170 25.5 49.9 12.7 22.9 4.4 55.9 69/66 58.4 12.2 (4) 3.54

Total 100.0 5.8 480.2 100.0 29 1 “Size” represents the percentage of the total number of FTES at each campus for Fall 2007 (Column 1). 2 “Growth” is measured in terms of the average percentage change in FTES between two periods: Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 and Fall 2007 to Fall 2008 (Column 2). 3 Column 3 shows the campus growth rate multiplied by 20 in the interest of emphasizing the growth factor. In order to remove the ‘minuses’ from the column, 100 was added to each resulting number. 4 “Percentage PT” represents the percentage of PT faculty (in Teaching Credit terms) for Fall 2008 (Column 5). Data Source: NOVA PeopleSoft Query 5 “Programmatic Mix” represents the weighted average of “funded ratios” of all disciplines of the campus, Fall 2007. (Column 7). 6 The Vacancy Adjustment is calculated by taking the Inverse of the ratio of the Number of Filled positions to the Number of Funded positions (Column

10). 7 Final allocation is made by apportioning the available positions on the basis of the percentages given in Column 12, which is based on the product in Column 11. In cases where the rounding up process produces a higher total than the actual number of positions to be allocated, one position is subtracted from the Campus with points closest to being rounded down (Column 13).

6

Table 1B: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 Final Allocation with ME Adjustment


(29 Available Positions)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Size


08)

(Growth x 20) +

100

Product (1 & 3)/

100 Percentage

PT

Product (4 & 5)/

100 Programmatic

Mix


Mix Product (6 & 8)

Vacancy Adjustment

Product (9 & 10) % Allocation

Alexandria 22.1 5.1 202 44.6 48.8 21.8 22.8 4.4 95.9 139/129 103.3 23.2 (7) 6.73

Annandale 35.3 5.5 210 74.1 43.5 32.2 23.4 4.3 138.5 176/168 145.1 32.6 (9) 9.45

Loudoun 14.1 9.7 294 41.5 52.5 21.8 23.3 4.3 93.7 65/61 99.8 22.4 (7) 6.50

Manassas 9.9 4.3 186 18.4 48.4 8.9 23.3 4.3 38.3 54/54 38.3 8.6 (2) 2.49 Medical Ed.8 3.6 12.9 358 12.9 32.2 4.1 11.6 8.6 35.3 66/66 --- --- --- ---

Woodbridge 15.0 3.5 170 25.5 49.9 12.7 22.9 4.4 55.9 69/66 58.4 13.2 (4) 3.83

Total 100.0 5.8 444.9 100.0 29

8 Due to a special allocation to the Medical Education Campus, calculations for the MEC columns 11, 12, and 13 are not given.

7

Table 1C: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 Based on 15 New Positions and 15% Presidential Discretion


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Size1


08)2

(Growth x 20) + 1003

Product (1 & 3)/

100 Percentage

PT4

Product (4 & 5)/

100 Programmatic

Mix5


Mix Product (6 & 8)

Vacancy Adjustment6

Product (9 & 10) % Allocation7

Alexandria 22.1 5.1 202 44.6 48.8 21.8 22.8 4.4 95.9 139/129 103.3 21.5 (7) 7.31

Annandale 35.3 5.5 210 74.1 43.5 32.2 23.4 4.3 138.5 176/168 145.1 30.2 (10) 10.27

Loudoun 14.1 9.7 294 41.5 52.5 21.8 23.3 4.3 93.7 65/61 99.8 20.8 (7) 7.07

Manassas 9.9 4.3 186 18.4 48.4 8.9 23.3 4.3 38.3 54/54 38.3 8.0 (3) 2.72

Medical Ed. 3.6 12.9 358 12.9 32.2 4.1 11.6 8.6 35.3 66/66 35.3 7.3 (3) 2.48

Woodbridge 15.0 3.5 170 25.5 49.9 12.7 22.9 4.4 55.9 69/66 58.4 12.2 (4) 4.15

Total 100.0 5.8 480.2 100.0 34 1 “Size” represents the percentage of the total number of FTES at each campus for Fall 2007 (Column 1). 2 “Growth” is measured in terms of the average percentage change in FTES between two periods: Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 and Fall 2007 to Fall 2008 (Column 2). 3 Column 3 shows the campus growth rate multiplied by 20 in the interest of emphasizing the growth factor. In order to remove the ‘minuses’ from the column, 100 was added to each resulting number. 4 “Percentage PT” represents the percentage of PT faculty (in Teaching Credit terms) for Fall 2008 (Column 5). Data Source: NOVA PeopleSoft Query 5 “Programmatic Mix” represents the weighted average of “funded ratios” of all disciplines of the campus, Fall 2007. (Column 7).

6 The Vacancy Adjustment is calculated by taking the Inverse of the ratio of the Number of Filled positions to the Number of Funded positions (Column 10).

7 Final allocation is made by apportioning the available positions on the basis of the percentages given in Column 12, which is based on the product in Column 11. In cases where the rounding up process produces a higher total than the actual number of positions to be allocated, one position is subtracted from the Campus with points closest to being rounded down (Column 13).

8

Table 1D: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2008-09 Final Allocation with ME Adjustment



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Size

Growth (Avg. of Fall 07 & 08)

(Growth x 20) +

100

Product (1 & 3)/

100 Percentage

PT

Product (4 & 5)/

100 Programmatic

Mix


Mix Product (6 & 8)

Vacancy Adjustment

Product (9 & 10) % Allocation

Alexandria 22.1 5.1 202 44.6 48.8 21.8 22.8 4.4 95.9 139/129 103.3 23.2 (8) 7.89

Annandale 35.3 5.5 210 74.1 43.5 32.2 23.4 4.3 138.5 176/168 145.1 32.6 (11) 11.08

Loudoun 14.1 9.7 294 41.5 52.5 21.8 23.3 4.3 93.7 65/61 99.8 22.4 (8) 7.62

Manassas 9.9 4.3 186 18.4 48.4 8.9 23.3 4.3 38.3 54/54 38.3 8.6 (3) 2.92 Medical Ed.8 3.6 12.9 358 12.9 32.2 4.1 11.6 8.6 35.3 66/66 --- --- --- ---

Woodbridge 15.0 3.5 170 25.5 49.9 12.7 22.9 4.4 55.9 69/66 58.4 13.2 (4) 4.49

Total 100.0 5.8 444.9 100.0 34

8 Due to a special allocation to the Medical Education Campus, calculations for the MEC columns 11, 12, and 13 are not given.

9

Table 2 shows the campus size in terms of FTES. It also shows the proportion of college FTES contributed by each campus for Fall 2007.

Table 2: Size of the Campus Based on Fall FTES -- Fall 2007

Campus Fall 2007 FTES Percent

Alexandria 5,316 22.1

Annandale 8,521 35.3

Loudoun 3,392 14.1

Manassas 2,393 9.9

Medical Education 874 3.6

Woodbridge 3,608 15.0

College 24,104 100.0

Table 3 gives, by campus and for the college, FTES for Fall 2006, Fall 2007 and Fall 2008. In addition, it shows the percent change in FTES from Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 and Fall 2007 to Fall 2008. The average percent change over the two-year period is also shown in the table.

Table 3: Growth by Campus -- Fall 2007 and Fall 2008

Campus Fall 2006 FTES*

Fall 2007 FTES*

Fall 2008 FTES**

% ChangeFA06-FA07

% Change FA07-FA08

Average % Change

06-07 and 07-08

Alexandria 4,862 5,316 5,365 9.3 0.9 5.1

Annandale 7,788 8,521 8,654 9.4 1.6 5.5

Loudoun 3,013 3,392 3,623 12.6 6.8 9.7

Manassas 2,215 2,393 2,408 8.0 0.6 4.3

Medical Education 724 874 918 20.7 5.0 12.9

Woodbridge 3,281 3,608 3,498 10.0 -3.0 3.5

College 21,884 24,104 24,466 10.1 1.5 5.8

*Fall 2006 and Fall 2007 FTES were obtained from IRIS files. **Fall 2008 FTES were obtained from People Soft in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester.

10

Table 4 shows full-time, part-time, and total teaching credit hours for each campus. In addition, the table gives the proportion (PT proportion) of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty at each campus.

Table 4: Part-time Faculty Proportion by Campus -- Fall 2008

Campus PT(adjunct)

Teaching Credit Hours

FT (9-mo.) Teaching Credit

Hours

Total Teaching Credit

Hours PT Proportion*

Alexandria 2,037 2,133 4,170 48.8

Annandale 2,440 3,167 5,607 43.5

Loudoun 1,349 1,221 2,570 52.5

Manassas 833 889 1,722 48.4

Medical Education 184 387 571 32.2

Woodbridge 1,461 1,469 2,930 49.9

College 8,304 9,266 17,570 47.3

Data Source: NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft Query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester * Refer to Table 9 for part-time faculty ratio by discipline.

Table 5 presents the campus multiple which is computed from the product of the discipline credits and discipline ratio and summed for the campus. In addition, the table gives the campus credit hours. The campus ratio (programmatic mix) is derived by dividing the campus multiple by the campus credit hours.

Table 5: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Campus Credit Hours Multiple* Ratio

Alexandria 79,734 1,820,165 22.8

Annandale 127,815 2,990,817 23.4

Loudoun 50,875 1,186,220 23.3

Manassas 35,887 836,071 23.3

Medical Education 13,102 151,361 11.6

Woodbridge 54,122 1,237,680 22.9

College 361,535 8,222,314 22.7

*Refer to Explanatory Notes for Tables 11.AL through 11.WO (p.3) for details on Campus programmatic mix calculations.

11

Tables 6A and 6B Tables 6A and 6B summarize the number of available positions and allocated 9-month teaching positions for 2008-09 based on two scenarios. Table 6A presents the first scenario where there are 7 new positions available for distribution, and 10% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. Table 6B presents the second scenario where there are 15 new positions available for distribution, and 15% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) are reserved for distribution through presidential discretion.

Table 6A: Current Vacant and Available Positions: 2008-09 Based on 7 New Positions and 10% Presidential Discretion

Available Positions Number

Allocated Positions Number

Current Vacancies 25 Allocation by Model 29Current ME 0 ME Allocation 0New Positions 7 Presidential Discretion 3Total 32 Total 32

Table 6B: Current Vacant and Available Positions: 2008-09 Based on 15 New Positions and 15% Presidential Discretion

Available Positions Number

Allocated Positions Number

Current Vacancies 25 Allocation by Model 34Current ME 0 ME Allocation 0New Positions 15 Presidential Discretion 6Total 40 Total 40

12

Tables 7.AL through 7.WO provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for Fall 2008 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline is calculated. The FTEF Requirement is calculated by dividing the actual FTES by the CFR, as shown in column 4 of the table. The tables also give Fall 2008 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 and part-time faculty headcount in column 7. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the full-time faculty headcount. Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester.

Table 7.AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Current Funded

Ratio FTEF

Requirement FT Faculty Headcount Difference PT Faculty

Headcount

ACC 159.6 19.9 8.0 31 -23.0 5ADJ 22.2 19.9 1.1 0 1.1 6ARA 37.5 19.9 1.9 3 -1.1 6ARC 43.9 15.4 2.9 4 -1.1 5ART 195.0 19.9 9.8 36 -26.2 24AST 8.0 19.9 0.4 6 -5.6 4AUB 13.9 15.4 0.9 3 -2.1 1AUT 78.3 15.4 5.1 22 -16.9 18BIO 320.5 26.5 12.1 32 -19.9 24BLD 34.8 15.4 2.3 4 -1.7 4BUS 131.4 19.9 6.6 26 -19.4 9CHD 83.2 19.9 4.2 14 -9.8 6CHI 8.1 19.9 0.4 0 0.4 4CHM 131.2 26.5 5.0 13 -8.0 10CIV 12.2 15.4 0.8 0 0.8 4CON 12.0 19.9 0.6 6 -5.4 0CSC 40.6 26.5 1.5 6 -4.5 5DEVE* 263.5 19.9 13.2 18 -4.8 24DEVM** 160.1 19.9 8.0 10 -2.0 16DRF 34.2 15.4 2.2 3 -0.8 6ECO 109.3 26.5 4.1 7 -2.9 17EDU 6.3 19.9 0.3 2 -1.7 1EGR 15.1 15.4 1.0 0 1.0 5ENG 393.9 26.5 14.9 53 -38.1 43ESL 647.1 23.2 27.9 45 -17.1 47FIN 11.2 19.9 0.6 4 -3.4 0FRE 38.8 19.9 1.9 14 -12.1 4GEO 19.8 26.5 0.7 0 0.7 6GER 6.3 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 2GOL 55.8 26.5 2.1 4 -1.9 10GRE 3.2 19.9 0.2 0 0.2 2HIN 3.3 19.9 0.2 0 0.2 1HIS 292.2 26.5 11.0 24 -13.0 37HLT 1.8 11.0 0.2 0 0.2 2HMS 21.2 19.9 1.1 0 1.1 8HUM 6.9 26.5 0.3 2 -1.7 1

13

Table 7.AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)


Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference PT Faculty

Headcount

ITA 15.5 19.9 0.8 0 0.8 4ITD 23.2 19.9 1.2 6 -4.8 3ITE 151.6 19.9 7.6 23 -15.4 10ITN 67.7 19.9 3.4 20 -16.6 9ITP 52.3 19.9 2.6 18 -15.4 2JPN 48.5 19.9 2.4 3 -0.6 6LAT 7.4 19.9 0.4 2 -1.6 1LBR 0.8 19.9 0.0 0 0.0 1LGL 80.2 19.9 4.0 10 -6.0 12MKT 18.8 19.9 0.9 1 -0.1 3MTH 284.2 26.5 10.7 26 -15.3 24MUS 73.9 19.9 3.7 32 -28.3 20NAS 97.3 15.4 6.3 9 -2.7 18PED 108.9 26.5 4.1 17 -12.9 30PHI 41.9 26.5 1.6 6 -4.4 7PHT 82.1 19.9 4.1 16 -11.9 11PHY 65.5 26.5 2.5 6 -3.5 5PLS 47.5 26.5 1.8 9 -7.2 10PSY 214.0 26.5 8.1 18 -9.9 36REA 5.2 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 2REL 18.3 26.5 0.7 8 -7.3 2RUS 19.5 19.9 1.0 0 1.0 3SDV 70.1 26.5 2.6 2 0.6 35SOC 64.8 26.5 2.4 11 -8.6 6SPA 121.7 19.9 6.1 13 -6.9 13SPD 155.4 26.5 5.9 19 -13.1 18VTN 6.7 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 2

*Developmental English **Developmental Math

14

Table 7.AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Annandale


FTEF Requirement


Headcount

ACC 223.6 19.9 11.2 25 -13.8 17ADJ 126.2 19.9 6.3 25 -18.7 14ARA 29.2 19.9 1.5 0 1.5 6ARC 54.6 15.4 3.5 10 -6.5 3ART 208.8 19.9 10.5 30 -19.5 34ASL 95.6 19.9 4.8 7 -2.2 15BIO 608.0 26.5 22.9 73 -50.1 86BUS 213.8 19.9 10.7 28 -17.3 22CHI 14.6 19.9 0.7 3 -2.3 1CHM 162.6 26.5 6.1 31 -24.9 23CSC 88.2 26.5 3.3 17 -13.7 3DEVE* 548.1 19.9 27.5 38 -10.5 55DEVM** 385.8 19.9 19.4 32 -12.6 21DIT 42.0 11.0 3.8 1 2.8 5DRF 23.2 15.4 1.5 4 -2.5 1ECO 249.6 26.5 9.4 20 -10.6 15EDU 3.2 19.9 0.2 1 -0.8 0EGR 88.5 15.4 5.7 30 -24.3 4ENG 823.3 26.5 31.1 112 -80.9 90ENV 2.2 15.4 0.1 1 -0.9 0ESL 546.7 23.2 23.6 46 -22.4 31ETR 7.5 15.4 0.5 3 -2.5 1FIN 14.2 19.9 0.7 1 -0.3 3FRE 35.1 19.9 1.8 0 1.8 6FST 25.2 19.9 1.3 7 -5.7 0GEO 7.0 26.5 0.3 0 0.3 2GER 17.2 19.9 0.9 0 0.9 4GOL 58.1 26.5 2.2 17 -14.8 6HIS 516.4 26.5 19.5 44 -24.5 31HRI 96.2 19.9 4.8 14 -9.2 12HUM 31.6 26.5 1.2 0 1.2 4INT 20.4 19.9 1.0 4 -3.0 4ITD 27.0 19.9 1.4 7 -5.6 1ITE 323.3 19.9 16.2 49 -32.8 24ITN 61.3 19.9 3.1 12 -8.9 4ITP 45.4 19.9 2.3 6 -3.7 6KOR 14.7 19.9 0.7 0 0.7 2MKT 54.6 19.9 2.7 2 0.7 11MSC 2.3 26.5 0.1 0 0.1 2MTH 759.5 26.5 28.7 79 -50.3 49MUS 89.8 19.9 4.5 49 -44.5 9NAS 230.1 15.4 14.9 35 -20.1 27PED 214.9 26.5 8.1 36 -27.9 51PHI 110.6 26.5 4.2 18 -13.8 9PHY 99.7 26.5 3.8 21 -17.2 10PLS 45.2 26.5 1.7 6 -4.3 2

15

Table 7.AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTEF Requirement


Headcount

PSY 378.6 26.5 14.3 26 -11.7 20REA 8.3 19.9 0.4 3 -2.6 3REL 12.6 26.5 0.5 1 -0.5 3RPK 16.9 19.9 0.8 7 -6.2 2SDV 115.1 26.5 4.3 0 4.3 41SOC 180.8 26.5 6.8 16 -9.2 17SPA 135.6 19.9 6.8 14 -7.2 11SPD 333.2 26.5 12.6 52 -39.4 20TRV 27.4 19.9 1.4 10 -8.6 7


16

Table 7.LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Loudoun


FTEF Requirement


Headcount

ACC 113.2 19.9 5.7 11 -5.3 12ARA 11.3 19.9 0.6 0 0.6 2ART 158.3 19.9 8.0 25 -17.0 23BIO 159.5 26.5 6.0 11 -5.0 10BUS 113.0 19.9 5.7 7 -1.3 16CHD 40.4 19.9 2.0 7 -5.0 9CHM 80.1 26.5 3.0 7 -4.0 7CSC 39.9 26.5 1.5 3 -1.5 7DEVE* 220.9 19.9 11.1 22 -10.9 16DEVM** 193.4 19.9 9.7 13 -3.3 18ECO 124.6 26.5 4.7 11 -6.3 12EDU 2.8 19.9 0.1 0 0.1 1ENG 341.3 26.5 12.9 39 -26.1 40ENV 5.6 15.4 0.4 1 -0.6 0ESL 193.7 23.2 8.3 9 -0.7 18FIN 7.4 19.9 0.4 0 0.4 2FRE 9.8 19.9 0.5 0 0.5 2GEO 59.0 26.5 2.2 8 -5.8 9GER 6.3 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 1GIS 7.5 19.9 0.4 0 0.4 5GOL 78.9 26.5 3.0 18 -15.0 8HIS 281.6 26.5 10.6 26 -15.4 25HLT 6.6 11.0 0.6 0 0.6 1HRT 34.1 15.4 2.2 15 -12.8 2HUM 14.4 26.5 0.5 4 -3.5 0IDS 43.8 19.9 2.2 10 -7.8 5ITA 11.7 19.9 0.6 0 0.6 2ITD 7.4 19.9 0.4 1 -0.6 1ITE 124.0 19.9 6.2 9 -2.8 19ITN 26.3 19.9 1.3 11 -9.7 1ITP 15.8 19.9 0.8 1 -0.2 2MKT 16.0 19.9 0.8 2 -1.2 1MTH 300.8 26.5 11.4 29 -17.6 29MUS 49.5 19.9 2.5 39 -36.5 18NAS 58.4 15.4 3.8 2 1.8 15PED 63.5 26.5 2.4 7 -4.6 28PHI 17.6 26.5 0.7 0 0.7 3PLS 30.4 26.5 1.1 0 1.1 6PSY 187.6 26.5 7.1 18 -10.9 19REL 19.8 26.5 0.7 0 0.7 6SDV 35.1 26.5 1.3 1 0.3 15SOC 57.4 26.5 2.2 0 2.2 10SPA 64.7 19.9 3.3 5 -1.7 5SPD 120.2 26.5 4.5 9 -4.5 17VET 69.3 11.0 6.3 25 -18.7 3


17

Table 7.MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Manassas


FTEF Requirement


Headcount

ACC 51.8 19.9 2.6 10 -7.4 2ADJ 65.2 19.9 3.3 5 -1.7 13ARA 4.7 19.9 0.2 0 0.2 1ART 84.3 19.9 4.2 15 -10.8 5AUT 78.9 15.4 5.1 14 -8.9 12BIO 171.7 26.5 6.5 19 -12.5 27BUS 66.4 19.9 3.3 5 -1.7 11CHD 43.0 19.9 2.2 14 -11.8 1CHI 6.3 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 2CHM 43.8 26.5 1.7 10 -8.3 10CSC 26.2 26.5 1.0 6 -5.0 1DEVE* 197.5 19.9 9.9 16 -6.1 18DEVM** 140.4 19.9 7.1 12 -4.9 12DSL 5.3 15.4 0.3 3 -2.7 0ECO 80.6 26.5 3.0 4 -1.0 8EDU 17.6 19.9 0.9 4 -3.1 2ENG 230.2 26.5 8.7 20 -11.3 30ENV 0.3 15.4 0.0 0 0.0 2ESL 122.7 23.2 5.3 6 -0.7 16FIN 6.2 19.9 0.3 3 -2.7 0FRE 8.2 19.9 0.4 0 0.4 2GEO 6.0 26.5 0.2 0 0.2 1GOL 11.2 26.5 0.4 0 0.4 4HIS 152.6 26.5 5.8 16 -10.2 9HLT 5.2 11.0 0.5 0 0.5 1ITE 76.2 19.9 3.8 13 -9.2 4ITN 8.8 19.9 0.4 3 -2.6 0ITP 15.7 19.9 0.8 2 -1.2 1MKT 2.2 19.9 0.1 0 0.1 1MTH 169.1 26.5 6.4 22 -15.6 10MUS 6.0 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 2NAS 18.1 15.4 1.2 2 -0.8 1PED 39.6 26.5 1.5 10 -8.5 9PHI 9.8 26.5 0.4 0 0.4 1PHY 24.0 26.5 0.9 7 -6.1 4PLS 19.6 26.5 0.7 3 -2.3 2PSY 139.4 26.5 5.3 13 -7.7 15REL 6.4 26.5 0.2 0 0.2 2SDV 48.1 26.5 1.8 0 1.8 18SOC 30.8 26.5 1.2 3 -1.8 3SPA 63.4 19.9 3.2 5 -1.8 6SPD 96.0 26.5 3.6 18 -14.4 7WEL 8.1 15.4 0.5 3 -2.5 0*Developmental English **Developmental Math

18

Table 7.ME: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Medical Education

Discipline FTES Current Funded

Ratio FTEF

Requirement FT Faculty Headcount Difference PT Faculty

Headcount

DMS* 5.4 --- --- 6 --- 0DNH 80.1 11.0 7.3 12 -4.7 7EMS 102.9 11.0 9.4 37 -27.6 21HIM* 50.1 --- --- 15 --- 4HLT 91.2 11.0 8.3 6 2.3 27MDL 21.2 11.0 1.9 16 -14.1 3NUR 344.1 11.0 31.3 29 2.3 5PTH 53.7 11.0 4.9 8 -3.1 10RAD 99.7 11.0 9.1 21 -11.9 1ROC 5.8 11.0 0.5 4 -3.5 0RTH 31.3 11.0 2.8 12 -9.2 8SDV 32.5 26.5 1.2 2 -0.8 14

*New Discipline --- Data not available.

19

Table 7.WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Woodbridge


FTEF Requirement


Headcount

ACC 171.2 19.9 8.6 32 -23.4 25ADJ 85.7 19.9 4.3 12 -7.7 20AIR 84.4 15.4 5.5 13 -7.5 10ARA 5.7 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 1ART 96.5 19.9 4.8 11 -6.2 11AST 31.4 19.9 1.6 26 -24.4 0BIO 170.1 26.5 6.4 13 -6.6 36BUS 200.4 19.9 10.1 19 -8.9 45CHM 32.3 26.5 1.2 6 -4.8 4CSC 18.8 26.5 0.7 0 0.7 6DEVE* 243.7 19.9 12.2 19 -6.8 22DEVM** 148.7 19.9 7.5 14 -6.5 18ECO 71.8 26.5 2.7 4 -1.3 9ENG 337.0 26.5 12.7 44 -31.3 40ESL 140.7 23.2 6.1 22 -15.9 3ETR 11.0 15.4 0.7 3 -2.3 0FIN 15.8 19.9 0.8 4 -3.2 1FRE 6.0 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 2GEO 6.8 26.5 0.3 0 0.3 2GER 23.9 19.9 1.2 0 1.2 13GOL 20.4 26.5 0.8 8 -7.2 0HIS 241.8 26.5 9.1 21 -11.9 18HLT 14.1 11.0 1.3 2 -0.7 5HUM 21.0 26.5 0.8 3 -2.2 3ITD 23.8 19.9 1.2 4 -2.8 8ITE 173.6 19.9 8.7 31 -22.3 26ITN 39.2 19.9 2.0 18 -16.0 12ITP 45.4 19.9 2.3 7 -4.7 16LBR 1.4 19.9 0.1 0 0.1 1MEC 6.0 15.4 0.4 4 -3.6 0MKT 14.8 19.9 0.7 2 -1.3 3MTH 181.0 26.5 6.8 33 -26.2 8MUS 6.5 19.9 0.3 0 0.3 16NAS 60.0 15.4 3.9 9 -5.1 7PBS 3.8 19.9 0.2 3 -2.8 12PED 48.3 26.5 1.8 9 -7.2 12PHI 9.4 26.5 0.4 0 0.4 1PHT 29.6 19.9 1.5 7 -5.5 6PHY 18.7 26.5 0.7 4 -3.3 4PLS 17.2 26.5 0.6 0 0.6 5PSY 165.2 26.5 6.2 19 -12.8 14REA 5.3 19.9 0.3 1 -0.7 1REL 15.0 26.5 0.6 0 0.6 8SDV 48.5 26.5 1.8 4 -2.2 23

20

Table 7.WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTEF Requirement


Headcount

SOC 90.6 26.5 3.4 10 -6.6 6SPA 143.1 19.9 7.2 12 -4.8 16SPD 152.6 26.5 5.8 22 -16.2 19


21

Tables 8.AL through 8.WO give FTES information by campus for each discipline. The five-year trend in FTES, Fall 2004 to Fall 2008, is displayed for each discipline along with the percent change from Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 and the average FTES over the time period. For disciplines that do not have data available for all 5 years, percent change is not given, however average FTES are based on the available data. The FTES data given for Fall 2008 are for the middle of the Fall 2008 semester and are therefore not the final figures.

Table 8.AL: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008


Discipline FTES Fall 2004

FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

% Change (Fall 04 - Fall 08) Average

ACC 151.6 165.2 153.8 167.0 159.6 5.3 159.4

ACQ 23.8 14.0 9.4 4.0 --- --- 12.8

ADJ 16.0 16.2 21.0 13.0 22.2 38.8 17.7

ARA 21.1 25.4 31.4 32.4 37.5 77.7 29.6

ARC 40.8 50.7 50.7 57.8 43.9 7.6 48.8

ART 162.9 171.2 160.7 166.8 195.0 19.7 171.3

AST 18.9 16.6 14.8 39.6 8.0 -57.7 19.6

AUB 9.1 9.3 11.5 17.9 13.9 52.7 12.3

AUT 94.1 106.4 98.3 109.0 78.3 -16.8 97.2

BIO 253.6 257.9 242.7 278.7 320.5 26.4 270.7

BLD 27.5 26.9 32.7 35.3 34.8 26.5 31.4

BUS 155.8 148.6 124.8 153.6 131.4 -15.7 142.8

CHD 93.3 103.2 97.0 83.0 83.2 -10.8 91.9

CHI 10.4 15.6 26.0 25.6 8.1 -22.1 17.1

CHM 119.1 117.7 101.2 105.3 131.2 10.2 114.9

CIV 8.3 7.2 8.0 10.2 12.2 47.0 9.2

CON --- --- 3.0 11.2 12.0 --- 8.7

CSC 39.8 42.9 32.9 37.7 40.6 2.0 38.8

DEVE* 195.9 222.9 225.9 251.8 263.5 34.5 232

DEVM** 134.0 144.1 113.5 141.9 160.1 19.5 138.7

DRF 44.3 44.8 39.5 44.6 34.2 -22.8 41.5

ECO 107.2 125.9 116.1 107.4 109.3 2.0 113.2

EDU 21.5 14.0 17.0 18.7 6.3 -70.7 15.5

EGR 18.3 18.9 13.9 14.9 15.1 -17.5 16.2

ENG 329.8 312.8 321.5 366.4 393.9 19.4 344.9

ESL 561.0 586.5 619.5 681.7 647.1 15.3 619.2

ETR --- --- 0.3 --- --- --- 0.3

FIN 8.8 8.0 8.0 10.4 11.2 27.3 9.3

FRE 46.9 34.1 39.3 35.5 38.8 -17.3 38.9

GEO 29.4 17.8 15.2 21.0 19.8 -32.7 20.6

GER 9.3 10.6 3.8 6.0 6.3 -32.3 7.2

22

Table 8.AL: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


GOL 46.8 49.5 44.0 41.6 55.8 19.2 47.5

GRE 5.0 3.2 4.2 2.8 3.2 -36.0 3.7

HIN --- --- --- --- 3.3 --- 3.3

HIS 232.6 257.2 242.8 257.2 292.2 25.6 256.4

HLT 5.2 4.8 4.6 7.7 1.8 -65.4 4.8

HMS 28.2 16.8 12.8 21.0 21.2 -24.8 20.0

HUM 5.2 4.4 7.4 8.0 6.9 32.7 6.4

ITA 31.9 24.9 25.6 20.0 15.5 -51.4 23.6

ITD 33.6 31.6 20.4 25.0 23.2 -31.0 26.8

ITE 83.3 105.0 111.0 137.7 151.6 82.0 117.7

ITN 50.9 50.4 46.6 52.5 67.7 33.0 53.6

ITP 52.4 43.3 46.5 57.5 52.3 -0.2 50.4

JPN 40.3 40.4 42.7 40.8 48.5 20.3 42.5

LAT 9.6 7.8 6.6 9.6 7.4 -22.9 8.2

LBR 0.3 0.9 0.9 --- 0.8 166.7 0.7

LGL 82.6 78.2 74.2 71.4 80.2 -2.9 77.3

MKT 23.6 21.2 20.4 21.6 18.8 -20.3 21.1

MTH 254.3 264.8 259.9 278.5 284.2 11.8 268.3

MUS 75.7 74.7 66.9 71.4 73.9 -2.4 72.5

NAS 70.4 66.9 73.1 102.7 97.3 38.2 82.1

PED 78.7 75.9 88.2 87.3 108.9 38.4 87.8

PHI 49.6 39.8 42.5 40.3 41.9 -15.5 42.8

PHT 81.0 80.6 74.8 78.7 82.1 1.4 79.4

PHY 71.1 70.7 72.5 74.3 65.5 -7.9 70.8

PLS 35.2 54.7 46.3 59.4 47.5 34.9 48.6

PSY 233.6 222.0 215.1 226.7 214.0 -8.4 222.3

REA 17.1 30.5 16.7 10.3 5.2 -69.6 16.0

REL 28.6 35.6 23.3 22.1 18.3 -36.0 25.6

RUS 11.9 10.5 14.3 15.3 19.5 63.9 14.3

SDV 66.5 52.7 64.5 63.5 70.1 5.4 63.5

SOC 70.0 67.3 68.9 61.9 64.8 -7.4 66.6

SPA 136.4 124.7 125.1 139.8 121.7 -10.8 129.5

SPD 136.5 143.1 142.2 157.6 155.4 13.8 147.0

SSC --- --- 0.4 0.3 --- --- 0.4

VTN 4.0 2.7 4.0 2.9 6.7 67.5 4.1

Campus 4,904.6 4,992.2 4,862.8 5,315.8 5,365.4 *Developmental English **Developmental Math --- Data not available.

23

Table 8.AN: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


ACC 237.5 214.0 202.4 248.4 223.6 -5.9 225.2

ADJ 194.2 194.3 154.3 156.4 126.2 -35.0 165.1

ARA 35.2 41.5 37.9 34.1 29.2 -17.0 35.6

ARC 48.7 62.7 55.4 60.0 54.6 12.1 56.3

ART 182.6 168.3 158.0 200.7 208.8 14.3 183.7

ASL 68.1 68.7 72.9 90.6 95.6 40.4 79.2

AST 10.0 --- --- --- --- --- 10.0

BIO 413.4 439.2 450.1 505.9 608.0 47.1 483.3

BUS 230.3 233.6 257.2 268.8 213.8 -7.2 240.7

CHI 14.7 19.7 14.8 23.1 14.6 -0.7 17.4

CHM 102.1 110.1 133.7 128.3 162.6 59.3 127.4

CSC 69.4 82.1 85.2 89.7 88.2 27.1 82.9

DEVE* 387.1 419.3 467.0 530.6 548.1 41.6 470.4

DEVM** 300.0 319.3 344.3 399.5 385.8 28.6 349.8

DIT 35.4 26.2 40.4 40.2 42.0 18.6 36.8

DRF 23.6 21.1 16.2 16.8 23.2 -1.7 20.2

ECO 219.4 217.6 248.4 295.4 249.6 13.8 246.1

EDU --- --- --- --- 3.2 --- 3.2

EGR 56.9 54.8 64.7 68.2 88.5 55.5 66.6

ENG 639.1 702.3 717.5 797.4 823.3 28.8 735.9

ENV --- --- --- --- 2.2 --- 2.2

ESL 539.7 484.7 514.3 518.3 546.7 1.3 520.7

ETR 13.1 13.9 6.1 7.5 7.5 -42.7 9.6

FIN 13.0 18.4 16.6 15.8 14.2 9.2 15.6

FRE 38.8 40.3 36.5 37.5 35.1 -9.5 37.6

FST 34.1 37.3 5.2 21.4 25.2 -26.1 24.6

GEO 10.8 11.0 11.0 8.6 7.0 -35.2 9.7

GER 17.7 19.7 19.9 23.5 17.2 -2.8 19.6

GOL 68.1 49.7 62.9 60.5 58.1 -14.7 59.9

HIS 437.4 453.8 484.2 548.4 516.4 18.1 488

HIT --- 0.2 --- --- --- --- 0.2

HRI 82.6 70.8 71.4 86.9 96.2 16.5 81.6

HUM 25.8 24.0 22.8 35.6 31.6 22.5 28.0

INT 11.8 7.2 15.4 14.6 20.4 72.9 13.9

ITD 24.2 22.4 19.6 23.4 27.0 11.6 23.3

ITE 207.9 225.4 281.4 302.4 323.3 55.5 268.1

ITN 106.5 94.5 68.7 47.0 61.3 -42.4 75.6

24

Table 8.AN: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


ITP 74.2 60.3 38.3 48.5 45.4 -38.8 53.3

KOR --- --- 11.7 17.0 14.7 --- 14.5

LBR 1.1 1.3 1.3 --- --- --- 1.2

MEC 3.4 --- --- 4.8 --- --- 4.1

MET 5.0 2.4 3.0 --- --- --- 3.5

MKT 60.6 58.6 58.0 65.2 54.6 -9.9 59.4

MSC --- --- --- 1.3 2.3 --- 1.8

MTH 634.6 621.5 665.3 695.0 759.5 19.7 675.2

MUS 78.4 79.1 81.7 88.5 89.8 14.5 83.5

NAS 173.9 240.3 259.7 255.7 230.1 32.3 231.9

PED 136.0 165.5 163.2 193.5 214.9 58.0 174.6

PHI 124.4 114.2 107.2 105.4 110.6 -11.1 112.4

PHY 69.1 70.3 76.3 88.3 99.7 44.3 80.7

PLS 70.0 51.2 50.2 52.2 45.2 -35.4 53.8

PSY 332.2 293.6 335.4 377.0 378.6 14.0 343.4

REA 70.9 73.1 41.6 20.8 8.3 -88.3 42.9

REL --- --- 14.8 16.8 12.6 --- 14.7

RPK 22.4 17.7 18.0 16.3 16.9 -24.6 18.3

SDV 82.5 79.2 88.6 100.1 115.1 39.5 93.1

SOC 172.8 155.8 155.9 180.2 180.8 4.6 169.1

SPA 156.7 161.1 161.3 133.8 135.6 -13.5 149.7

SPD 269.4 261.4 268.8 315.4 333.2 23.7 289.6

TRV 40.3 39.1 30.9 39.7 27.4 -32.0 35.5


25

Table 8.LO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


ACC 88.8 99.0 102.0 116.4 113.2 27.5 103.9

ARA 10.2 11.3 11.7 12.9 11.3 10.8 11.5

ART 158.0 161.6 153.3 155.7 158.3 0.2 157.4

AST 4.7 2.2 3.1 3.4 --- --- 3.4

BIO 126.4 124.9 118.4 151.5 159.5 26.2 136.1

BUS 101.8 127.0 122.8 130.6 113.0 11.0 119.0

CHD 27.2 28.0 36.2 30.8 40.4 48.5 32.5

CHM 43.7 53.2 64.5 74.9 80.1 83.3 63.3

CSC 29.1 35.9 39.4 38.5 39.9 37.1 36.6

DEVE* 147.2 170.5 173.7 188.6 220.9 50.1 180.2

DEVM** 146.1 140.4 160.4 185.9 193.4 32.4 165.2

ECO 66.4 80.6 79.4 104.8 124.6 87.7 91.2

EDU --- --- --- 3.2 2.8 --- 3.0

ENG 243.5 269.3 263.0 303.9 341.3 40.2 284.2

ENV --- --- --- 5.4 5.6 --- 5.5

ESL 134.7 145.7 152.3 190.3 193.7 43.8 163.3

FIN 10.0 9.2 14.4 12.6 7.4 -26.0 10.7

FRE 10.4 11.1 4.3 10.2 9.8 -5.8 9.2

GEO 47.6 42.4 41.2 57.0 59.0 23.9 49.4

GER 8.0 --- --- 6.0 6.3 -21.3 6.8

GIS --- 4.3 5.6 8.8 7.5 --- 6.6

GOL 39.5 45.6 58.1 69.3 78.9 99.7 58.3

HIS 238.2 265.2 278.6 282.0 281.6 18.2 269.1

HLT --- --- 4.2 5.6 6.6 --- 5.5

HRT 38.4 40.8 34.9 39.7 34.1 -11.2 37.6

HUM --- 2.8 10.2 8.8 14.4 --- 9.1

IDS 54.6 54.8 44.7 50.3 43.8 -19.8 49.6

ITA --- 9.7 10.2 8.0 11.7 --- 9.9

ITD 6.0 8.2 2.6 6.4 7.4 23.3 6.1

ITE 63.8 79.4 84.4 102.9 124.0 94.4 90.9

ITN 26.3 16.6 19.0 25.0 26.3 0.0 22.6

ITP 18.9 26.8 15.4 16.1 15.8 -16.4 18.6

MKT 11.8 14.4 14.8 18.6 16.0 35.6 15.1

MTH 196.7 227.4 247.8 277.6 300.8 52.9 250.1

MUS 53.1 58.9 52.1 48.8 49.5 -6.8 52.5

NAS 5.9 6.9 20.3 49.1 58.4 889.8 28.1

PED 44.3 48.8 52.9 49.0 63.5 43.3 51.7

26

Table 8.LO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


PHI 15.4 17.6 11.4 14.6 17.6 14.3 15.3

PLS 23.4 24.4 24.6 28.6 30.4 29.9 26.3

PSY 136.2 150.6 148.0 162.0 187.6 37.7 156.9

REL 7.2 10.4 16.4 14.4 19.8 175.0 13.6

RPK 0.7 --- --- --- --- --- 0.7

SDV 28.2 21.3 26.0 31.2 35.1 24.5 28.4

SOC 52.2 53.8 51.8 63.6 57.4 10.0 55.8

SPA 65.9 60.6 63.1 69.5 64.7 -1.8 64.8

SPD 91.2 95.2 107.2 89.8 120.2 31.8 100.7

VET 70.3 59.5 68.1 66.2 69.3 -1.4 66.7

VTN --- --- --- 3.3 --- --- 3.3


27

Table 8.MA: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


ACC 70.0 63.0 57.8 51.0 51.8 -26.0 58.7

ADJ 82.8 80.8 75.4 70.0 65.2 -21.3 74.8

ARA --- 7.3 5.3 6.7 4.7 --- 6.0

ART 77.7 60.4 72.0 81.5 84.3 8.5 75.2

AUT 87.3 76.8 97.4 98.0 78.9 -9.6 87.7

BIO 117.9 117.3 124.9 133.6 171.7 45.6 133.1

BUS 74.0 74.2 66.0 64.4 66.4 -10.3 69.0

CHD 54.0 46.6 40.8 55.8 43.0 -20.4 48.0

CHI --- --- --- --- 6.3 --- 6.3

CHM 31.1 38.9 30.1 38.1 43.8 40.8 36.4

CSC 24.9 22.6 19.3 21.1 26.2 5.2 22.8

DEVE* 150.5 163.7 173.5 182.1 197.5 31.2 173.5

DEVM** 107.0 114.9 125.9 152.5 140.4 31.2 128.1

DSL --- --- --- --- 5.3 --- 5.3

ECO 49.0 49.4 48.6 71.8 80.6 64.5 59.9

EDU 23.7 23.4 28.8 19.4 17.6 -25.7 22.6

ENG 193.1 203.9 196.4 217.3 230.2 19.2 208.2

ENV 2.0 3.5 3.3 3.3 0.3 -85.0 2.5

ESL 107.3 101.7 120.3 128.7 122.7 14.4 116.1

FIN 3.0 5.4 2.8 7.6 6.2 106.7 5.0

FRE 10.1 8.9 9.3 9.1 8.2 -18.8 9.1

GEO --- --- --- 5.8 6.0 --- 5.9

GOL 11.7 11.2 12.0 11.8 11.2 -4.3 11.6

HIS 136.2 133.6 152.4 153.2 152.6 12.0 145.6

HLT 6.7 6.8 5.6 5.6 5.2 -22.4 6.0

ITD 2.8 4.6 3.0 3.4 --- --- 3.5

ITE 50.4 64.6 71.8 71.2 76.2 51.2 66.8

ITN 6.5 9.5 10.1 4.6 8.8 35.4 7.9

ITP 12.6 12.7 12.5 19.3 15.7 24.6 14.6

LBR --- --- 0.5 1.1 --- --- 0.8

MKT --- --- --- 3.2 2.2 --- 2.7

MTH 143.5 169.5 158.9 184.9 169.1 17.8 165.2

MUS 0.6 0.7 0.9 6.4 6.0 900.0 2.9

NAS 8.0 14.1 6.7 12.3 18.1 126.3 11.8

PED 32.4 32.3 31.9 31.1 39.6 22.2 33.5

PHI 9.6 8.8 10.4 10.2 9.8 2.1 9.8

28

Table 8.MA: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


PHY 22.1 27.8 29.1 27.2 24.0 8.6 26.0

PLS 12.4 16.2 14.4 15.4 19.6 58.1 15.6

PSY 114.6 130.8 146.6 143.4 139.4 21.6 135.0

REL 12.0 10.4 10.8 7.8 6.4 -46.7 9.5

SDV 30.0 29.3 36.8 39.5 48.1 60.3 36.7

SOC 30.2 27.6 30.8 37.2 30.8 2.0 31.3

SPA 45.0 42.0 56.7 64.5 63.4 40.9 54.3

SPD 91.4 96.0 91.8 110.4 96.0 5.0 97.1

WEL 22.7 22.7 23.9 11.1 8.1 -64.3 17.7


29

Table 8.ME: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


DMS* --- --- --- --- 5.4 --- 5.4

DNH 39.4 69.9 73.7 86.7 80.1 103.3 70.0

EMS 73.5 92.8 85.3 99.7 102.9 40.0 90.8

HIM* --- --- --- --- 50.1 --- 50.1

HIT 48.2 34.3 44.9 52.0 --- --- 44.9

HLT 56.9 62.7 79.3 90.7 91.2 60.3 76.2

MDL 29.1 24.9 20.3 18.2 21.2 -27.1 22.7

NUR 197.3 213.2 225.6 309.2 344.1 74.4 257.9

PTH 45.5 50.7 48.5 50.9 53.7 18.0 49.9

RAD 59.2 75.8 88.1 96.1 99.7 68.4 83.8

ROC --- --- --- 2.1 5.8 --- 4.0

RTH 44.8 23.3 31.9 36.8 31.3 -30.1 33.6

SDV --- 12.7 26.7 31.1 32.5 --- 25.8

Campus 593.9 660.3 724.3 873.5 918.0 *New Discipline --- Data not available.

30

Table 8.WO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


ACC 144.2 139.6 158.2 182.8 171.2 18.7 159.2

ADJ 97.8 83.0 95.5 100.2 85.7 -12.4 92.4

AIR 74.6 74.5 71.5 78.1 84.4 13.1 76.6

ARA --- --- 5.0 6.3 5.7 --- 5.7

ART 73.5 84.5 73.5 94.1 96.5 31.3 84.4

AST 25.5 30.4 31.5 28.6 31.4 23.1 29.5

BIO 173.1 168.9 163.7 183.8 170.1 -1.7 171.9

BUS 197.6 184.4 209.8 214.4 200.4 1.4 201.3

CHM 26.1 25.1 26.1 26.7 32.3 23.8 27.3

CSC 26.0 24.2 22.2 23.7 18.8 -27.7 23.0

DEVE* 198.9 217.5 216.4 229.3 243.7 22.5 221.2

DEVM** 116.6 123.7 137.5 152.1 148.7 27.5 135.7

ECO 45.0 47.0 66.0 74.6 71.8 59.6 60.9

EDU --- 0.5 --- --- --- --- 0.5

ENG 303.0 312.6 336.0 342.2 337.0 11.2 326.2

ESL 101.3 113.1 120.3 135.7 140.7 38.9 122.2

ETR 18.3 17.6 --- 13.2 11.0 -39.9 15.0

FIN 9.6 13.0 10.8 15.0 15.8 64.6 12.8

FRE 8.3 8.1 7.1 9.7 6.0 -27.7 7.8

GEO 5.6 10.8 7.8 6.8 6.8 21.4 7.6

GER 15.4 17.5 16.5 19.2 23.9 55.2 18.5

GOL 6.4 12.3 20.3 21.9 20.4 218.8 16.3

HIS 222.8 204.6 229.4 266.4 241.8 8.5 233.0

HLT 14.9 13.5 11.1 12.9 14.1 -5.4 13.3

HUM 19.4 20.8 18.6 15.6 21.0 8.2 19.1

ITD 16.6 17.0 36.2 46.2 23.8 43.4 28.0

ITE 146.6 138.7 179.9 189.1 173.6 18.4 165.6

ITN 64.5 47.9 74.7 73.9 39.2 -39.2 60.0

ITP 42.7 38.3 45.9 46.7 45.4 6.3 43.8

LBR --- --- --- --- 1.4 --- 1.4

MEC 10.0 10.0 4.4 7.3 6.0 -40.0 7.5

MKT 10.6 10.8 13.2 17.2 14.8 39.6 13.3

MTH 175.1 177.8 167.5 179.7 181.0 3.4 176.2

MUS 7.1 7.7 8.3 7.2 6.5 -8.5 7.4

NAS 68.3 66.1 69.1 71.7 60.0 -12.2 67.0

PBS 5.4 5.2 6.0 7.6 3.8 -29.6 5.6

PED 38.1 39.9 36.9 43.5 48.3 26.8 41.3

31

Table 8.WO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)



FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008


PHI 8.2 9.8 5.4 11.4 9.4 14.6 8.8

PHT 26.2 28.2 26.0 24.8 29.6 13.0 27.0

PHY 25.1 27.7 19.2 21.9 18.7 -25.5 22.5

PLS 7.4 9.8 8.8 15.6 17.2 132.4 11.8

PSY 152.2 138.2 152.6 179.0 165.2 8.5 157.4

REA 23.5 22.7 12.3 6.9 5.3 -77.4 14.1

REL 26.8 18.6 21.4 20.0 15.0 -44.0 20.4

SDV 41.6 35.7 40.4 43.9 48.5 16.6 42.0

SOC 58.6 56.4 61.4 82.2 90.6 54.6 69.8

SPA 119.9 126.2 125.6 129.6 143.1 19.3 128.9

SPD 117.4 105.5 111.2 129.4 152.6 30.0 123.2


32

Tables 9.AL through 9.WO give the teaching credit hours (TCH) by campus and discipline. The tables show full-time and part-time faculty teaching credit hours and total faculty teaching credit hours (the sum of full- and part-time TCH) and the proportion of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty. The tables are sorted from highest to lowest according to the part-time proportion. The data shown in this table was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester.

Table 9.AL: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ADJ 0 18 18 100.0

CHI 0 17 17 100.0

CIV 0 9 9 100.0

EGR 0 14 14 100.0

GEO 0 18 18 100.0

GER 0 8 8 100.0

GRE 0 6 6 100.0

HIN 0 5 5 100.0

HLT 0 4 4 100.0

HMS 0 24 24 100.0

ITA 0 16 16 100.0

LBR 0 1 1 100.0

REA 0 7 7 100.0

RUS 0 13 13 100.0

VTN 0 8 8 100.0

SDV 2 41 43 95.4

MKT 3 9 12 75.0

ECO 19 51 70 72.9

PSY 52 108 160 67.5

GOL 13 25 38 65.8

PED 23 42 65 64.6

JPN 15 27 42 64.3

NAS 20 36 56 64.3

DRF 12 19 31 61.3

HIS 72 111 183 60.7

PHI 14 21 35 60.0

DEVM** 38 56 94 59.6

ARA 15 22 37 59.5

PLS 21 30 51 58.8

33

Table 9.AL: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


DEVE* 72 100 172 58.1

LGL 30 36 66 54.6

ARC 14 15 29 51.7

ESL 228 244 472 51.7

MTH (NON-DEV) 86 84 170 49.4

BIO 92 88 180 48.9

SPD 57 54 111 48.7

SPA 53 49 102 48.0

BLD 12 11 23 47.8

ENG (NON-DEV) 159 125 284 44.0

MUS 61 46 107 43.0

EDU 4 3 7 42.9

CSC 19 14 33 42.4

AST 18 12 30 40.0

PHY 27 18 45 40.0

AUT 74 49 123 39.8

CHM 49 32 81 39.5

PHT 45 29 74 39.2

SOC 29 18 47 38.3

ART 127 78 205 38.1

ITD 18 9 27 33.3

LAT 6 3 9 33.3

ITN 64 29 93 31.2

ITE 69 30 99 30.3

CHD 42 18 60 30.0

BUS 78 27 105 25.7

FRE 52 18 70 25.7

AUB 12 4 16 25.0

REL 20 6 26 23.1

HUM 6 1 7 14.3

ACC 93 15 108 13.9

ITP 68 6 74 8.1

CON 18 0 18 0.0

FIN 12 0 12 0.0

Campus 2,133 2,037 4,170 48.8 *Developmental English **Developmental Math

34

Table 9.AN: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Campus = Annandale

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


ARA 0 26 26 100.0

FRE 0 28 28 100.0

GEO 0 6 6 100.0

GER 0 16 16 100.0

HUM 0 12 12 100.0

KOR 0 10 10 100.0

MSC 0 2 2 100.0

SDV 0 42 42 100.0

MKT 6 33 39 84.6

DIT 3 15 18 83.3

FIN 3 9 12 75.0

REL 3 9 12 75.0

ASL 24 54 78 69.2

DEVE* 155 231 386 59.8

PED 45 66 111 59.5

BIO 120 164 284 57.8

ITP 21 24 45 53.3

ART 108 119 227 52.4

SOC 48 49 97 50.5

INT 12 12 24 50.0

NAS 64 64 128 50.0

ENG (NON-DEV) 336 270 606 44.6

BUS 84 66 150 44.0

PSY 78 60 138 43.5

ECO 60 45 105 42.9

SPA 60 45 105 42.9

TRV 26 19 45 42.2

CHM 65 47 112 42.0

HIS 132 93 225 41.3

ESL 240 165 405 40.7

ACC 75 51 126 40.5

DEVM** 125 82 207 39.6

HRI 45 29 74 39.2

MTH (NON-DEV) 283 165 448 36.8

ITE 144 72 216 33.3

PHI 54 27 81 33.3

35

Table 9.AN: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Campus = Annandale

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


PHY 46 22 68 32.4

REA 11 5 16 31.3

ADJ 75 31 106 29.3

GOL 31 12 43 27.9

CHI 13 5 18 27.8

SPD 156 60 216 27.8

ETR 12 4 16 25.0

PLS 18 6 24 25.0

ARC 31 10 41 24.4

ITN 39 12 51 23.5

DRF 16 4 20 20.0

CSC 52 10 62 16.1

MUS 100 18 118 15.3

ITD 21 3 24 12.5

EGR 78 9 87 10.3

RPK 22 2 24 8.3

EDU 3 0 3 0.0

ENV 3 0 3 0.0

FST 21 0 21 0.0


36

Table 9.LO: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


ARA 0 8 8 100.0

EDU 0 3 3 100.0

FIN 0 6 6 100.0

FRE 0 8 8 100.0

GER 0 5 5 100.0

GIS 0 15 15 100.0

HLT 0 3 3 100.0

ITA 0 8 8 100.0

PHI 0 9 9 100.0

PLS 0 18 18 100.0

REL 0 18 18 100.0

SOC 0 30 30 100.0

SDV 1 16 17 94.1

NAS 4 32 36 88.9

CSC 8 22 30 73.3

PED 11 28 39 71.8

ITP 3 7 10 70.0

BUS 21 48 69 69.6

ITE 27 57 84 67.9

SPD 27 51 78 65.4

ESL 55 90 145 62.1

DEVM** 48 67 115 58.3

CHD 21 27 48 56.3

GEO 24 27 51 52.9

SPA 21 23 44 52.3

ACC 33 36 69 52.2

ECO 33 36 69 52.2

BIO 37 40 77 52.0

ENG (NON-DEV) 111 120 231 52.0

PSY 54 57 111 51.4

CHM 24 24 48 50.0

ITD 3 3 6 50.0

ART 89 88 177 49.7

HIS 78 75 153 49.0

MTH (NON-DEV) 100 90 190 47.4

DEVE* 90 72 162 44.4

37

Table 9.LO: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


MKT 6 3 9 33.3

IDS 32 15 47 31.9

MUS 84 38 122 31.2

GOL 36 16 52 30.8

HRT 37 4 41 9.8

ITN 34 3 37 8.1

VET 54 3 57 5.3

ENV 3 0 3 0.0

HUM 12 0 12 0.0


38

Table 9.MA: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Campus = Manassas

Discipline FT TCH PT TCH

Total Teaching


ARA 0 5 5 100.0

CHI 0 10 10 100.0

ENV 0 4 4 100.0

FRE 0 8 8 100.0

GEO 0 3 3 100.0

GOL 0 8 8 100.0

HLT 0 3 3 100.0

MKT 0 3 3 100.0

MUS 0 4 4 100.0

PHI 0 3 3 100.0

REL 0 6 6 100.0

SDV 0 21 21 100.0

ESL 30 90 120 75.0

ADJ 15 39 54 72.2

BUS 15 33 48 68.8

ECO 12 24 36 66.7

ENG (NON-DEV) 60 88 148 59.5

SPA 21 26 47 55.3

DEVE* 68 84 152 55.3

PSY 39 45 84 53.6

DEVM** 47 52 99 52.5

BIO 48 52 100 52.0

CHM 20 21 41 51.2

NAS 4 4 8 50.0

SOC 9 9 18 50.0

PED 12 10 22 45.5

AUT 46 31 77 40.3

PLS 9 6 15 40.0

HIS 48 27 75 36.0

EDU 12 6 18 33.3

PHY 16 7 23 30.4

MTH (NON-DEV) 78 34 112 30.4

ITP 7 3 10 30.0

SPD 54 21 75 28.0

ART 55 19 74 25.7

ITE 39 12 51 23.5

ACC 30 6 36 16.7

39

Table 9.MA: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH)

by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Campus = Manassas


Total Teaching


CSC 18 3 21 14.3

CHD 42 3 45 6.7

DSL 8 0 8 0.0

FIN 9 0 9 0.0

ITN 11 0 11 0.0

WEL 7 0 7 0.0

Campus 889 833 1,722 48.4 *Developmental English **Developmental Math

40

Table 9.ME: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Campus = Medical Education


Total Teaching


SDV 2 14 16 87.5

HLT 12 46 58 79.3

PTH 6 18 24 75.0

RTH 18 23 41 56.1

EMS 67 32 99 32.3

MDL 19 9 28 32.1

HIM* 42 12 54 22.2

DNH 36 10 46 21.7

NUR 109 17 126 13.5

RAD 56 3 59 5.1

DMS* 9 0 9 0.0

ROC 11 0 11 0.0

Campus 387 184 571 32.2 *New Discipline

41

Table 9.WO: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008

Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


ARA 0 5 5 100.0

CSC 0 15 15 100.0

FRE 0 10 10 100.0

GEO 0 6 6 100.0

GER 0 53 53 100.0

LBR 0 1 1 100.0

MUS 0 25 25 100.0

PHI 0 3 3 100.0

PLS 0 15 15 100.0

REL 0 24 24 100.0

PBS 9 36 45 80.0

SDV 7 24 31 77.4

ITP 23 57 80 71.3

BUS 57 135 192 70.3

BIO 24 56 80 70.0

ECO 12 27 39 69.2

ITD 12 24 36 66.7

SPA 49 74 123 60.2

MKT 6 9 15 60.0

ADJ 36 52 88 59.1

DEVM** 49 63 112 56.3

DEVE* 73 90 163 55.2

HUM 9 9 18 50.0

PHY 8 8 16 50.0

REA 4 4 8 50.0

ART 39 38 77 49.4

PED 14 13 27 48.2

ENG (NON-DEV) 132 120 252 47.6

SPD 64 57 121 47.1

HIS 63 54 117 46.2

PHT 21 18 39 46.2

HLT 6 5 11 45.5

ITE 90 73 163 44.8

ACC 96 75 171 43.9

NAS 16 12 28 42.9

PSY 57 42 99 42.4

AIR 46 31 77 40.3

42

Table 9.WO: Part-time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FT

TCH PT

TCH

Total Teaching


CHM 12 8 20 40.0

SOC 30 18 48 37.5

ITN 57 30 87 34.5

FIN 12 3 15 20.0

MTH (NON-DEV) 109 24 133 18.1

ESL 115 15 130 11.5

AST 78 0 78 0.0

ETR 11 0 11 0.0

GOL 16 0 16 0.0

MEC 7 0 7 0.0


43

Tables 10.AL through 10.WO provide discipline productivity information for each campus. Discipline productivity is expressed as a percentage and is computed by dividing the actual discipline semester ratio of FTES to FTEF by the current funded ratio. Productivity data in the tables are given for five years, however, productivity prior to Fall 2005 is not comparable with productivity for Fall 2005 onward because different ratios were used in the productivity calculation. Prior to Fall 2005, the Appendix M ratio (old ratio) was used. From Fall 2005 onward, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model is used. In Fall 2006, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) was revised. Due to this revision, the efficiency factor for NOVA was changed from 1.17 in Fall 2005 to 1.103 in Fall 2006. For Fall 2007 and Fall 2008, FTEF data included in Tables 10.AL through 10.WO was obtained through the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester. Adjunct faculty FTEF was calculated according to load. In prior years, FTEF figures came from the “Discipline Performance Statistics Report” produced by the Information Technology department. The FTEF data from this report derived FTEF from faculty load. For Fall 2005, productivity data for the English and Math disciplines is unavailable. Human Resources was unable to provide data that accurately reflects how FTEF for faculty teaching in these disciplines is split between English/Developmental English and Math/Developmental Math. As the developmental components of these two disciplines have different funded ratios from the non-developmental components, information concerning how the FTEF is subdivided is paramount to the calculation of productivity.

Table 10.AL: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008


Discipline Productivity Fall2004*

Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**



Change (Fall 07-08)

ACC 163 157 121 108 112 4ACQ 81 55 59 34 --- --- ADJ 76 64 53 55 93 38ARA 115 86 54 54 76 22ARC 161 176 161 161 147 -14ART 79 79 68 73 72 -1AST 75 72 37 45 20 -25AUB 100 102 75 87 84 -3AUT 114 108 90 90 62 -28BIO 106 112 143 99 101 2BLD 136 177 104 123 147 24BUS 97 87 95 86 95 9CHD 96 89 90 91 105 14CHI 62 74 59 54 36 -18CHM 117 121 129 90 92 2CIV 127 118 140 110 132 22CON --- --- 25 71 50 -21CSC 157 127 64 69 70 1DEVE*** --- --- 114 122 116 -6DEVM**** --- --- 126 137 129 -8DRF 115 113 96 101 107 6ECO 75 68 72 87 88 1EDU 170 64 94 68 -26EGR 145 155 91 104 105 1

44

Table 10.AL: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)


Discipline Productivity Fall2004*





Change (Fall 07-08)

ENG --- --- 99 80 79 -1ESL --- 97 97 90 89 -1ETR --- --- 7 --- --- --- FIN 90 --- 101 37 71 34FRE --- 73 45 37 42 5GEO 77 63 41 57 62 5GER 75 56 36 45 60 15GOL 44 138 118 91 83 -8GRE 123 --- 53 24 40 16HIN --- --- --- --- 50 --- HIS 118 104 88 106 90 -16HLT 85 --- 209 259 60 -199HMS --- 72 40 88 67 -21HUM 84 --- 70 76 55 -21ITA 19 79 71 56 73 17ITD --- 75 51 48 65 17ITE 71 96 102 96 116 20ITN 72 82 54 39 55 16ITP 104 71 58 52 53 1JPN 60 106 95 81 87 6LAT 62 185 83 81 62 -19LBR 119 --- 62 --- 58 --- LGL 114 98 93 90 92 2MKT --- 72 85 109 118 9MTH --- --- 112 101 95 -6MUS 93 79 46 51 52 1NAS --- --- 178 178 169 -9PED 78 59 88 90 95 5PHI --- 51 65 67 68 1PHT 59 78 78 67 84 17PHY 80 116 111 86 82 -4PLS 83 122 71 69 53 -16PSY 103 107 77 72 76 4REA 70 145 84 71 56 -15REL 104 90 53 40 40 0RUS 153 100 136 145 113 -32SDV --- --- 70 106 93 -13SOC 106 86 69 95 78 -17SPA --- 80 72 76 90 14SPD 66 83 75 71 79 8SSC --- --- 6 16 --- --- VTN 111 43 61 28 64 36*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math --- Data not available

45

Table 10.AN: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008


Discipline Productivity Fall 2004*





Change (Fall 07-08)

ACC 141 154 121 142 134 -8ADJ 151 144 75 92 90 -2ARA 89 104 92 89 85 -4ARC 110 142 171 146 129 -17ART 116 97 62 68 70 2ASL 131 96 82 83 93 10AST 47 --- --- --- --- --- BIO 121 111 161 119 121 2BUS 150 181 127 144 108 -36CHI --- 156 74 80 61 -19CHM 108 102 105 77 82 5CSC 103 111 96 81 80 -1DEVE*** --- --- 110 116 107 -9DEVM**** --- --- 152 161 141 -20DIT 144 160 306 364 317 -47DRF --- --- 113 136 112 -24ECO 195 194 146 147 135 -12EDU --- --- --- --- 81 --- EGR 123 129 76 91 99 8ENG --- --- 87 74 77 3ENV --- --- --- --- 71 --- ESL 103 92 105 89 87 -2ETR 43 46 54 92 45 -47FIN --- --- 83 80 89 9FRE 98 101 89 123 95 -28FST 97 136 65 77 91 14GEO 96 98 69 81 66 -15GER 84 78 83 85 81 -4GOL 92 107 132 80 76 -4HIS 171 165 134 140 130 -10HRI 116 93 98 103 98 -5HUM --- --- 143 168 149 -19INT --- --- 77 74 64 -10ITD 82 88 62 74 85 11ITE 102 110 108 110 113 3ITN 92 136 71 91 91 0ITP 108 92 55 75 76 1KOR --- --- 88 128 111 -17LBR --- --- 91 --- --- --- MEC --- --- --- 78 --- --- MET 24 11 8 --- --- --- MKT 114 99 63 103 106 3MSC --- --- --- 70 67 -3MTH --- --- 104 94 96 2MUS 80 85 51 65 57 -8NAS --- --- 218 194 174 -20PED 64 74 107 113 110 -3

46

Table 10.AN: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)







Change (Fall 07-08)

PHI 117 116 69 66 77 11PHY 86 88 113 85 83 -2PLS 156 114 95 110 107 -3PSY 184 157 185 166 155 -11REA 187 192 105 54 39 -15REL --- --- 93 79 59 -20RPK 80 84 44 39 53 14SDV --- --- 143 142 155 13SOC 128 109 87 97 106 9SPA 111 99 101 104 98 -6SPD 100 95 85 89 87 -2TRV 74 62 36 61 46 -15

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math --- Data not available

47

Table 10.LO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008







Change (Fall 07-08)

ACC 111 112 142 127 124 -3ARA 91 107 111 123 107 -16ART 86 81 71 62 68 6AST 82 52 58 63 --- --- BIO 105 110 171 126 117 -9BUS 142 128 134 132 124 -8CHD 92 95 83 86 64 -22CHM 100 93 121 94 95 1CSC --- 106 114 73 75 2DEVE*** --- --- 105 109 103 -6DEVM**** --- --- 138 130 127 -3ECO 107 96 94 90 102 12EDU --- --- --- 81 71 -10ENG --- --- 79 75 84 9ENV --- --- --- 175 181 6ESL 139 95 100 88 86 -2FIN --- --- 90 106 93 -13FRE 93 105 66 97 93 -4GEO 154 151 60 67 66 -1GER 115 --- --- 92 96 4GIS --- --- 53 48 38 -10GOL 89 98 109 75 86 11HIS 132 133 110 104 104 0HLT --- --- 191 254 299 45HRT 110 104 100 99 81 -18HUM --- --- 27 33 68 35IDS 92 90 78 95 70 -25ITA --- 153 97 122 111 -11ITD 71 97 65 81 93 12ITE 80 108 112 113 112 -1ITN 78 79 48 52 54 2ITP 61 79 83 87 119 32MKT --- --- 124 156 134 -22MTH --- --- 108 84 90 6MUS 108 121 34 32 31 -1NAS 159 140 165 132 158 26PED 69 62 88 87 92 5PHI 110 89 108 92 111 19PLS 139 54 155 108 96 -12PSY 146 161 146 96 96 0REL 64 62 103 54 62 8RPK 45 --- --- --- --- --- SDV --- --- 113 110 116 6SOC 133 128 109 133 108 -25

48

Table 10.LO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)







Change (Fall 07-08)

SPA 130 131 122 119 111 -8SPD 95 94 84 77 87 10VET 120 95 130 191 165 -26VTN --- --- --- 50 --- ---


49

Table 10.MA: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008







Change (Fall 07-08)

ACC 79 107 112 117 109 -8ADJ 103 101 111 98 91 -7ARA --- 115 81 102 72 -30ART 131 110 85 82 86 4AUT 90 86 133 120 99 -21BIO 96 90 107 95 97 2BUS 135 126 118 135 105 -30CHD 80 69 68 88 72 -16CHI --- --- --- --- 47 --- CHM 92 97 71 59 61 2CSC --- 119 104 86 71 -15DEVE*** --- --- 94 92 98 6DEVM**** --- --- 120 123 107 -16DSL --- --- --- --- 65 --- ECO --- 103 115 136 127 -9EDU --- 69 90 98 74 -24ENG --- --- 98 89 88 -1ENV --- --- 80 79 7 -72ESL 90 91 91 88 66 -22FIN --- --- 70 96 52 -44FRE 91 84 88 86 78 -8GEO --- --- --- 110 113 3GOL 70 88 114 74 80 6HIS 91 95 106 121 115 -6HLT --- --- 255 254 236 -18ITD --- 73 75 86 --- --- ITE 60 128 113 112 113 1ITN 155 56 76 116 61 -55ITP 60 67 86 105 118 13LBR --- --- 38 79 --- --- MKT --- --- --- 81 55 -26MTH --- --- 102 86 86 0MUS 41 33 62 119 112 -7NAS --- --- 160 148 217 69PED 82 77 106 104 102 -2PHI 114 104 196 193 185 -8PHY 87 110 95 77 59 -18PLS 110 --- 91 97 74 -23PSY 117 116 123 108 94 -14REL 107 93 102 74 60 -14SDV --- --- 149 160 130 -30SOC 119 123 194 141 97 -44

50

Table 10.MA: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)







Change (Fall 07-08)

SPA 114 105 115 102 102 0SPD 81 78 82 74 73 -1WEL 150 149 139 84 112 28


51

Table 10.ME: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008







Change (Fall 07-08)

DNH --- 58 233 203 237 34EMS --- 120 134 146 141 -5HIT --- 127 161 133 --- --- HLT --- --- 190 209 214 5MDL --- 79 89 99 103 4NUR --- 63 385 337 371 34PTH --- 108 275 288 304 16RAD --- 162 215 184 230 46ROC --- --- --- 71 72 1RTH --- 37 124 93 104 11SDV --- --- 101 110 116 6

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency --- Data not available

52

Table 10.WO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008







Change (Fall 07-08)

ACC 121 132 74 85 76 -9ADJ 155 94 81 82 74 -8AIR 86 80 106 95 106 11ARA --- --- 47 47 87 40ART 92 79 77 79 95 16AST 121 103 28 25 30 5BIO 102 96 162 130 121 -9BUS 127 102 81 87 79 -8CHM 95 92 123 94 92 -2CSC --- --- 99 79 71 -8DEVE*** --- --- 89 105 113 8DEVM**** --- --- 108 106 100 -6ECO 133 93 84 108 104 -4ENG --- --- 73 74 76 2ESL 84 80 70 68 70 2ETR --- --- --- 117 98 -19FIN --- --- 39 76 80 4FRE 120 77 26 35 45 10GEO 100 96 74 64 64 0GER 100 92 59 27 34 7GOL 30 58 117 89 72 -17HIS 137 117 124 136 117 -19HLT --- --- 168 134 175 41HUM 147 185 58 49 66 17ITD 197 62 61 65 50 -15ITE 95 140 95 98 80 -18ITN 94 63 50 43 34 -9ITP 179 96 43 46 43 -3LBR --- --- --- --- 101 --- MEC --- --- 65 118 83 -35MKT --- 85 111 87 75 -12MTH --- --- 85 72 77 5MUS 85 91 25 22 20 -2NAS 198 149 169 174 208 34PBS 128 123 10 13 6 -7PED 62 68 95 91 101 10PHI 146 116 102 72 178 106PHT 52 67 50 52 57 5PHY 74 82 85 78 67 -11PLS 132 87 83 98 65 -33PSY 148 134 119 106 95 -11REA --- --- 84 43 49 6REL 106 110 50 47 35 -12

53

Table 10.WO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2004 to Fall 2008 (Cont’d)







Change (Fall 07-08)

SDV --- --- 79 78 89 11SOC 139 112 97 119 107 -12SPA 105 109 101 77 88 11SPD 91 85 68 66 71 5


54

Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI show, by campus (including ELI) and discipline, student credit hours generated, the discipline ratio, and the discipline multiple. The discipline multiple is computed by multiplying the credit hours by the ratio. The credits and the multiples are summed for each campus. The programmatic mix for the campus is calculated by dividing the total of the discipline multiples by the total of the discipline credit hours.

Table 11.AL: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007


Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 2,505.0 19.9 49,849.5 --- ACQ 60.0 19.9 1,194.0 --- ADJ 195.0 19.9 3,880.5 --- ARA 486.0 19.9 9,671.4 --- ARC 867.0 15.4 13,351.8 --- ART 2,502.0 19.9 49,789.8 --- AST 594.0 19.9 11,820.6 --- AUB 268.0 15.4 4,127.2 --- AUT 1,635.0 15.4 25,179.0 --- BIO 4,180.0 26.5 110,770.0 --- BLD 530.0 15.4 8,162.0 --- BUS 2,304.0 19.9 45,849.6 --- CHD 1,245.0 19.9 24,775.5 --- CHI 384.0 19.9 7,641.6 --- CHM 1,579.0 26.5 41,843.5 --- CIV 153.0 15.4 2,356.2 --- CON 168.0 19.9 3,343.2 --- CSC 565.0 26.5 14,972.5 --- DEVE* 3,777.0 19.9 75,162.3 --- DEVM** 2,129.0 19.9 42,367.1 --- DRF 669.0 15.4 10,302.6 --- ECO 1,611.0 26.5 42,691.5 --- EDU 280.0 19.9 5,572.0 --- EGR 223.0 15.4 3,434.2 --- ENG 5,496.0 26.5 145,644.0 --- ESL 10,226.0 23.2 237,243.2 --- FIN 156.0 19.9 3,104.4 --- FRE 532.0 19.9 10,586.8 --- GEO 315.0 26.5 8,347.5 --- GER 90.0 19.9 1,791.0 --- GOL 624.0 26.5 16,536.0 --- GRE 42.0 19.9 835.8 --- HIS 3,858.0 26.5 102,237.0 --- HLT 115.0 11.0 1,265.0 --- HMS 315.0 19.9 6,268.5 --- HUM 120.0 26.5 3,180.0 --- ITA 300.0 19.9 5,970.0 --- ITD 375.0 19.9 7,462.5 --- ITE 2,065.0 19.9 41,093.5 --- ITN 787.0 19.9 15,661.3 --- ITP 863.0 19.9 17,173.7 --- JPN 612.0 19.9 12,178.8 --- LAT 144.0 19.9 2,865.6 --- LGL 1,071.0 19.9 21,312.9 ---

55

Table 11.AL: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Alexandria Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix MKT 324.0 19.9 6,447.6 --- MTH 4,177.0 26.5 110,690.5 --- MUS 1,071.0 19.9 21,312.9 --- NAS 1,540.0 15.4 23,716.0 --- PED 1,310.0 26.5 34,715.0 --- PHI 605.0 26.5 16,032.5 --- PHT 1,181.0 19.9 23,501.9 --- PHY 1,114.0 26.5 29,521.0 --- PLS 891.0 26.5 23,611.5 --- PSY 3,401.0 26.5 90,126.5 --- REA 154.0 19.9 3,064.6 --- REL 331.0 26.5 8,771.5 --- RUS 230.0 19.9 4,577.0 --- SDV 953.0 26.5 25,254.5 --- SOC 929.0 26.5 24,618.5 --- SPA 2,097.0 19.9 41,730.3 --- SPD 2,364.0 26.5 62,646.0 --- SSC 4.0 26.5 106.0 --- VTN 43.0 19.9 855.7 ---

Campus 79,734.0 1,820,164.6 22.8 *Developmental English **Developmental Math --- Not applicable

56

Table 11.AN: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007


Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix

ACC 3,726.0 19.9 74,147.4 ---

ADJ 2,346.0 19.9 46,685.4 ---

ARA 512.0 19.9 10,188.8 ---

ARC 900.0 15.4 13,860.0 ---

ART 3,010.0 19.9 59,899.0 ---

ASL 1,359.0 19.9 27,044.1 ---

BIO 7,588.0 26.5 201,082.0 ---

BUS 4,032.0 19.9 80,236.8 ---

CHI 347.0 19.9 6,905.3 ---

CHM 1,924.0 26.5 50,986.0 ---

CSC 1,346.0 26.5 35,669.0 ---

DEVE* 7,959.0 19.9 158,384.1 ---

DEVM** 5,992.0 19.9 119,240.8 ---

DIT 603.0 11.0 6,633.0 ---

DRF 252.0 15.4 3,880.8 ---

ECO 4,431.0 26.5 117,421.5 ---

EGR 1,023.0 15.4 15,754.2 ---

ENG 11,961.0 26.5 316,966.5 ---

ESL 7,775.0 23.2 180,380.0 ---

ETR 112.0 15.4 1,724.8 ---

FIN 237.0 19.9 4,716.3 ---

FRE 563.0 19.9 11,203.7 ---

FST 321.0 19.9 6,387.9 ---

GEO 129.0 26.5 3,418.5 ---

GER 353.0 19.9 7,024.7 ---

GOL 907.0 26.5 24,035.5 ---

HIS 8,226.0 26.5 217,989.0 ---

HRI 1,304.0 19.9 25,949.6 ---

HUM 534.0 26.5 14,151.0 ---

INT 219.0 19.9 4,358.1 ---

ITD 351.0 19.9 6,984.9 ---

ITE 4,536.0 19.9 90,266.4 ---

ITN 705.0 19.9 14,029.5 ---

ITP 728.0 19.9 14,487.2 ---

KOR 255.0 19.9 5,074.5 ---

MEC 72.0 15.4 1,108.8 ---

MKT 978.0 19.9 19,462.2 ---

MSC 19.0 26.5 503.5 ---

MTH 10,425.0 26.5 276,262.5 ---

57

Table 11.AN: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 (Cont’d)



MUS 1,328.0 19.9 26,427.2 ---

NAS 3,836.0 15.4 59,074.4 ---

PED 2,902.0 26.5 76,903.0 ---

PHI 1,581.0 26.5 41,896.5 ---

PHY 1,324.0 26.5 35,086.0 ---

PLS 783.0 26.5 20,749.5 ---

PSY 5,655.0 26.5 149,857.5 ---

REA 312.0 19.9 6,208.8 ---

REL 252.0 26.5 6,678.0 ---

RPK 244.0 19.9 4,855.6 ---

SDV 1,501.0 26.5 39,776.5 ---

SOC 2,703.0 26.5 71,629.5

SPA 2,007.0 19.9 39,939.3 ---

SPD 4,731.0 26.5 125,371.5 ---

TRV 596.0 19.9 11,860.4 ---

Campus 127,815.0 2,990,817.0 23.4 *Developmental English **Developmental Math

--- Not applicable

58

Table 11.LO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007



ACC 1,746.0 19.9 34,745.4 ---

ARA 193.0 19.9 3,840.7 ---

ART 2,335.0 19.9 46,466.5 ---

AST 51.0 19.9 1,014.9 ---

BIO 2,272.0 26.5 60,208.0 ---

BUS 1,959.0 19.9 38,984.1 ---

CHD 462.0 19.9 9,193.8 ---

CHM 1,123.0 26.5 29,759.5 ---

CSC 577.0 26.5 15,290.5 ---

DEVE* 2,829.0 19.9 56,297.1 ---

DEVM** 2,789.0 19.9 55,501.1 ---

ECO 1,572.0 26.5 41,658.0 ---

EDU 48.0 19.9 955.2 ---

ENG 4,559.0 26.5 120,813.5 ---

ENV 81.0 15.4 1,247.4 ---

ESL 2,855.0 23.2 66,236.0 ---

FIN 189.0 19.9 3,761.1 ---

FRE 153.0 19.9 3,044.7 ---

GEO 855.0 26.5 22,657.5 ---

GER 90.0 19.9 1,791.0 ---

GIS 132.0 19.9 2,626.8 ---

GOL 1,040.0 26.5 27,560.0 ---

HIS 4,230.0 26.5 112,095.0 ---

HLT 84.0 11.0 924.0 ---

HRT 595.0 15.4 9,163.0 ---

HUM 132.0 26.5 3,498.0 ---

IDS 754.0 19.9 15,004.6 ---

ITA 120.0 19.9 2,388.0 ---

ITD 96.0 19.9 1,910.4 ---

ITE 1,543.0 19.9 30,705.7 ---

ITN 375.0 19.9 7,462.5 ---

ITP 241.0 19.9 4,795.9 ---

MKT 279.0 19.9 5,552.1 ---

MTH 4,164.0 26.5 110,346.0 ---

MUS 732.0 19.9 14,566.8 ---

NAS 736.0 15.4 11,334.4 ---

PED 735.0 26.5 19,477.5 ---

PHI 219.0 26.5 5,803.5 ---

PLS 429.0 26.5 11,368.5 ---

59

Table 11.LO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 (Cont’d)



PSY 2,430.0 26.5 64,395.0 ---

REL 216.0 26.5 5,724.0 ---

SDV 468.0 26.5 12,402.0 ---

SOC 954.0 26.5 25,281.0 ---

SPA 1,043.0 19.9 20,755.7 ---

SPD 1,347.0 26.5 35,695.5 ---

VET 993.0 11.0 10,923.0 ---

VTN 50.0 19.9 995.0 ---

Campus 50,875.0 1,186,219.9 23.3 *Developmental English **Developmental Math --- Not applicable

60

Table 11.MA: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007



ACC 765.0 19.9 15,223.5 ---

ADJ 1,050.0 19.9 20,895.0 ---

ARA 100.0 19.9 1,990.0 ---

ART 1,222.0 19.9 24,317.8 ---

AUT 1,470.0 15.4 22,638.0 ---

BIO 2,004.0 26.5 53,106.0 ---

BUS 966.0 19.9 19,223.4 ---

CHD 837.0 19.9 16,656.3 ---

CHM 572.0 26.5 15,158.0 ---

CSC 316.0 26.5 8,374.0 ---

DEVE* 2,732.0 19.9 54,366.8 ---

DEVM** 2,288.0 19.9 45,531.2 ---

ECO 1,077.0 26.5 28,540.5 ---

EDU 291.0 19.9 5,790.9 ---

ENG 3,259.0 26.5 86,363.5 ---

ENV 50.0 15.4 770.0 ---

ESL 1,930.0 23.2 44,776.0 ---

FIN 114.0 19.9 2,268.6 ---

FRE 137.0 19.9 2,726.3 ---

GEO 87.0 26.5 2,305.5 ---

GOL 177.0 26.5 4,690.5 ---

HIS 2,298.0 26.5 60,897.0 ---

HLT 84.0 11.0 924.0 ---

ITD 51.0 19.9 1,014.9 ---

ITE 1,068.0 19.9 21,253.2 ---

ITN 69.0 19.9 1,373.1 ---

ITP 289.0 19.9 5,751.1 ---

LBR 16.0 19.9 318.4 ---

MKT 48.0 19.9 955.2 ---

MTH 2,773.0 26.5 73,484.5 ---

MUS 96.0 19.9 1,910.4 ---

NAS 184.0 15.4 2,833.6 ---

PED 467.0 26.5 12,375.5 ---

PHI 153.0 26.5 4,054.5 ---

PHY 408.0 26.5 10,812.0 ---

PLS 231.0 26.5 6,121.5 ---

PSY 2,151.0 26.5 57,001.5 ---

REL 117.0 26.5 3,100.5 ---

SDV 592.0 26.5 15,688.0 ---

61

Table 11.MA: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 (Cont’d)



SOC 558.0 26.5 14,787.0 ---

SPA 968.0 19.9 19,263.2 ---

SPD 1,656.0 26.5 43,884.0 ---

WEL 166.0 15.4 2,556.4 ---

Campus 35,887.0 836,071.3 23.3 *Developmental English **Developmental Math --- Not applicable

62

Table 11.ME: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007



DNH 1,301.0 11.0 14,311.0 ---

EMS 1,495.0 11.0 16,445.0 ---

HIT 780.0 11.0 8,580.0 ---

HLT 1,360.0 11.0 14,960.0 ---

MDL 273.0 11.0 3,003.0 ---

NUR 4,638.0 11.0 51,018.0 ---

PTH 763.0 11.0 8,393.0 ---

RAD 1,441.0 11.0 15,851.0

ROC 32.0 11.0 352.0 ---

RTH 552.0 11.0 6,072.0 ---

SDV 467.0 26.5 12,375.5 ---

Campus 13,102.0 151,360.5 11.6 --- Not applicable

63

Table 11.WO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007



ACC 2,742.0 19.9 54,565.8 ---

ADJ 1,503.0 19.9 29,909.7 ---

AIR 1,172.0 15.4 18,048.8 ---

ARA 95.0 19.9 1,890.5 ---

ART 1,411.0 19.9 28,078.9 ---

AST 429.0 19.9 8,537.1 ---

BIO 2,757.0 26.5 73,060.5 ---

BUS 3,216.0 19.9 63,998.4 ---

CHM 400.0 26.5 10,600.0 ---

CSC 356.0 26.5 9,434.0 ---

DEVE* 3,439.0 19.9 68,436.1 ---

DEVM** 2,281.0 19.9 45,391.9 ---

ECO 1,119.0 26.5 29,653.5 ---

ENG 5,133.0 26.5 136,024.5 ---

ESL 2,035.0 23.2 47,212.0 ---

ETR 198.0 15.4 3,049.2 ---

FIN 225.0 19.9 4,477.5 ---

FRE 145.0 19.9 2,885.5 ---

GEO 102.0 26.5 2,703.0 ---

GER 288.0 19.9 5,731.2 ---

GOL 329.0 26.5 8,718.5 ---

HIS 3,996.0 26.5 105,894.0 ---

HLT 193.0 11.0 2,123.0 ---

HUM 234.0 26.5 6,201.0 ---

ITD 693.0 19.9 13,790.7 ---

ITE 2,837.0 19.9 56,456.3 ---

ITN 1,109.0 19.9 22,069.1 ---

ITP 700.0 19.9 13,930.0 ---

MEC 109.0 15.4 1,678.6 ---

MKT 258.0 19.9 5,134.2 ---

MTH 2,696.0 26.5 71,444.0 ---

MUS 108.0 19.9 2,149.2 ---

NAS 1,076.0 15.4 16,570.4 ---

PBS 114.0 19.9 2,268.6 ---

PED 653.0 26.5 17,304.5 ---

PHI 171.0 26.5 4,531.5 ---

PHT 372.0 19.9 7,402.8 ---

PHY 328.0 26.5 8,692.0 ---

PLS 234.0 26.5 6,201.0 ---

PSY 2,685.0 26.5 71,152.5 ---

64

Table 11.WO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 (Cont’d)


Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix REA 104.0 19.9 2,069.6 ---

REL 300.0 26.5 7,950.0 ---

SDV 659.0 26.5 17,463.5 ---

SOC 1,233.0 26.5 32,674.5 ---

SPA 1,944.0 19.9 38,685.6 ---

SPD 1,941.0 26.5 51,436.5 ---

Campus 54,122 1,237,679.7 22.9 *Developmental English **Developmental Math

--- Not applicable

65

Table 11.ELI: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007

Course Campus = ELI Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix

ACC 1,671.0 19.9 33,252.9 --- ADJ 648.0 19.9 12,895.2 --- ART 711.0 19.9 14,148.9 --- ASL 126.0 19.9 2,507.4 --- AST 276.0 19.9 5,492.4 --- BIO 1,888.0 26.5 50,032.0 --- BUS 1,575.0 19.9 31,342.5 --- CHD 93.0 19.9 1,850.7 --- CHI 40.0 19.9 796.0 --- CHM 184.0 26.5 4,876.0 --- DEVE* 521.0 19.9 10,367.9 --- DEVM** 684.0 19.9 13,611.6 --- DNH 772.0 11.0 8,492.0 --- ECO 555.0 26.5 14,707.5 --- EDU 144.0 19.9 2,865.6 --- EGR 198.0 15.4 3,049.2 --- ENG 2,706.0 26.5 71,709.0 --- ESL 420.0 23.2 9,744.0 --- FIN 261.0 19.9 5,193.9 --- FRE 201.0 19.9 3,999.9 --- GEO 579.0 26.5 15,343.5 --- GER 203.0 19.9 4,039.7 --- GIS 36.0 19.9 716.4 --- HIS 2,046.0 26.5 54,219.0 --- HIT 506.0 11.0 5,566.0 --- HLT 372.0 11.0 4,092.0 --- HRI 8.0 19.9 159.2 --- HUM 210.0 26.5 5,565.0 --- INT 60.0 19.9 1,194.0 --- ITD 306.0 19.9 6,089.4 --- ITE 1,509.0 19.9 30,029.1 --- ITN 302.0 19.9 6,009.8 --- ITP 494.0 19.9 9,830.6 --- LBR 16.0 19.9 318.4 --- LGL 39.0 19.9 776.1 --- MKT 270.0 19.9 5,373.0 --- MTH 1,892.0 26.5 50,138.0 --- NAS 1,176.0 15.4 18,110.4 --- NUR 257.0 11.0 2,827.0 --- PBS 114.0 19.9 2,268.6 --- PED 400.0 26.5 10,600.0 --- PHI 918.0 26.5 24,327.0 --- PHT 96.0 19.9 1,910.4 --- PHY 284.0 26.5 7,526.0 --- PLS 336.0 26.5 8,904.0 --- PSY 1,425.0 26.5 37,762.5 --- RAD 104.0 11.0 1,144.0 --- REL 321.0 26.5 8,506.5 ---

66

Table 11.ELI: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2007 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = ELI Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix

SDV 381.0 26.5 10,096.5 --- SOC 534.0 26.5 14,151.0 --- SPA 1,081.0 19.9 21,511.9 --- SPD 855.0 26.5 22,657.5 --- TRV 201.0 19.9 3,999.9 ---

Campus 31,005.0 696,697.0 22.5 *Developmental English **Developmental Math --- Not applicable

67

Table 12 compares the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty ratios.

Table 12: Comparison of Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee Student/Faculty Ratios

PROGRAM Discipline/Division Course Level

Appendix M Ratio

JS Ratio

Biological Sciences 04 20 22 18Business and Commerce Technologies 50 20 16 18Computer and Info Sciences 07 20 22 18Data Processing Technologies 51 20 16 18Education 08 20 22 20Fine and Applied Arts 10 20 16 18Foreign Languages 11 20 16 18Health Services and Paramedical Technologies 52 20 10 10Interdisciplinary Studies 49 20 22 24Letters 15 10 15 18Letters 15 20 22 20Mathematics 17 10 15 18Mathematics 17 20 22 20Mechanical and Engineering Technologies 53 20 12 13Military Science 18 20 22 24Natural Science Technologies 54 20 12 14Physical Sciences 19 20 22 18Psychology 20 20 22 20Public Service Related Technologies 55 20 16 18Social Sciences 22 20 22 24

• Beginning with Fall 2005, the student/faculty ratio for each discipline has changed.

• The new student/faculty ratios are determined under the Base Budget Adequacy Funding

Model rather than the Appendix M guidelines. The Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model was developed by the Joint Subcommittee on Higher Education Funding Policies.

• Table 12 provides a comparison of the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty

ratios. The ratios are presented by program area.

• Table 13 adapts the information from Table 11 and gives the student/faculty ratios by discipline. In Table 13, the report provides the student/faculty ratios developed under the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model and compares them with the Appendix M guidelines for each campus and discipline.

• As can be seen in the Table 13, Column 2 gives the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model

Ratio. The Appendix M Ratio can be seen in Column 4.

• Under the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model, each VCCS institution has been provided with an efficiency factor with which they are expected to operate. Since NOVA is expected to operate at 110% efficiency, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model ratio is adjusted by 1.103 and the adjusted ratio is shown in Column 3 of Table 13.

• Under Appendix M guidelines each campus had a different efficiency factor based on their

size. Appendix M ratios adjusted for campus size are shown in Columns 5-10 of Table 13.

68

Table 13 shows, by discipline, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) and the new ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. The table also displays, by discipline and campus, the Appendix M ratio (old ratio) and the old ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor.

Table 13: Student/Faculty Ratio by Discipline -- Comparison of “Old” and “New” Ratios

Discipline

Base Budget Adequacy

Funding Model Ratio (New

Ratio)

New Ratio Adjusted for

NOVA Efficiency

Factor (110%)

Appendix M

Ratio (Old Ratio)

Old Ratio Adjusted for NOVA Efficiency Factor

AL AN LO MA ME WO

ACC 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ACQ 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ADJ 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 AIR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ARA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ARC 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ART 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ASL 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 AST 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 AUB 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 AUT 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 BIO 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 BLD 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 BUS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 CHD 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 CHI 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 CHM 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 CON 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- CIV 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 CSC 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 DEVE* 18 19.9 15 18.0 18.2 17.1 17.0 --- 17.4 DEVM** 18 19.9 15 18.0 18.2 17.1 17.0 --- 17.4 DIT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- DMS*** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- DNH 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- DRF 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 DSL 14 15.4 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ECO 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 EDU 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 EGR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ELE 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 EMS/EMT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- ENG 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 ENV 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 18.2 13.2 --- 13.9 ESL 21 23.2 15 18.0 18.2 17.1 17.0 --- 17.4 ESR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ETR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 FIN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 FRE 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 FST/FIR 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 GEO 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 GER 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 GIS 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- GOL 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 GRE 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 HIM*** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HIN 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HIS 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 HIT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- ---

69

Table 13: Student/Faculty Ratio by Discipline -- Comparison of “Old” and “New” Ratios (Cont’d)

*Developmental English **Developmental Math ***New Discipline --- Data not available

Discipline

Base Budget Adequacy

Funding Model Ratio (New

Ratio)

New Ratio Adjusted for

NOVA Efficiency

Factor (110%)

Appendix M Ratio

(Old Ratio)

Old Ratio Adjusted for NOVA Efficiency Factor

AL AN LO MA ME WO

HLT 10 11.0 10 10.8 10.8 --- --- --- --- HMS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 HRI 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 HRT 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 HUM 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 IDS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 INT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITD 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITE 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITP 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 JPN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 KOR 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- LAT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 LBR 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 LGL 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 MDA 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- MDL 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- MEC 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 MET 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 MKT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 MSC 24 26.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- MTH 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 MUS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 NAS 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 NUR 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- OMP 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- OPT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- PBS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 PED 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PHI 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PHT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 PHY 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PLS 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PSY 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PTH 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- RAD 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- REA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 REL 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 ROC 10 11.0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- RPK 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 RTH 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- RUS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 SDV/STD 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 SOC 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 SPA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 SPD 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 SSC 24 26.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- TRV 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 VET 10 11.0 12 --- 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 VTN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 WEL 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9

70

Table 14 displays discipline prefixes used in this report and gives a description. As five-year trend data are displayed in this report, this table lists disciplines that may have been phased out within the last five years.

Table 14: Course Prefixes and Descriptions

*New Discipline

Prefix Description Prefix Description ACC ACCOUNTING INT INTERPRETER EDUCATION ACQ ACQUISITIONS IST INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY ADJ ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ITA ITALIAN AIR AIR CONDITIONING & REFRIGERATION ITD INFORMATION TECH DATABASE &DESIGN ARA ARABIC ITE INFORMATION TECH ESSENTIALS ARC ARCHITECTURE ITN INFORMATION TECH NETWORKING ART ARTS ITP INFORMATION TECH PROGRAMMING ASL AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE JPN JAPANESE AST ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY KOR KOREAN AUB AUTO BODY LAT LATIN AUT AUTOMOTIVE LBR LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY BIO BIOLOGY LGL PARALEGAL STUDIES BLD BUILDING MDA MEDICAL ASSISTING BUS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & ADMIN. MDL MEDICAL LABORATORY CHD CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT MEC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CHI CHINESE MET MEDIA TECHNOLOGY CHM CHEMISTRY MKT MARKETING CIV CIVIL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY MSC* MILITARY SCIENCE CON CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MTH MATHEMATICS CSC COMPUTER SCIENCE MUS MUSIC DEVE DEVELOPMENTAL ENGLIGH NAS NATURAL SCIENCE DEVM DEVELOPMENTAL MATH NUR NURSING DIT DIETETICS OMP OPHTHALMIC MEDICAL PERSONNEL DMS* DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY OPT OPTICIANRY DNH DENTAL HYGIENE PBS PUBLIC SERVICE DRF DRAFTING PED PHYSICAL EDUCATION & RECREATION DSL* DIESEL PHI PHILOSOPHY ECO ECONOMICS PHT PHOTOGRAPHY EDU EDUCATION PHY PHYSICS EGR ENGINEERING PLS POLITICAL SCIENCE ELE ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY PSY PSYCHOLOGY EMS/EMT EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

(formerly EMT) PTH PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANT

ENG ENGLISH RAD RADIOLOGY ENV ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE REA REAL ESTATE ESL ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE REL RELIGION ESR ELECTRONIC SERVICING ROC RADIATION ONCOLOGY ETR ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY RPK RECREATION & PARKS FIN FINANCIAL SERVICES RTH RESPIRATORY THERAPY FRE FRENCH RUS RUSSIAN FST/FIR FIRE SCIENCE (formerly FIR) SDV/STD COLLEGE SUCCESS SKILLS (formerly STD) GEO GEOGRAPHY SCM SIGN COMMUNICATIONS GER GERMAN SOC SOCIOLOGY GIS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPA SPANISH GOL GEOLOGY SPD SPEECH & DRAMA GRE GREEK SSC SOCIAL SCIENCE HIM* HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT TEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT HIN HINDI TRV TRAVEL & TOURISM HIS HISTORY VET VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY HIT HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VTN VIETNAMESE HLT HEALTH WEL WELDING HMS HUMAN SERVICES HRI HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT HRT HORTICULTURE HUM HUMANITIES IDS INTERIOR DESIGN

71

APPENDIX

72

The following tables provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for Fall 2008 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline is calculated. The FTEF Requirement is calculated by dividing the actual FTES by the CFR, as shown in column 4 of the table. The tables also give Fall 2008 full-time FTEF in column 5 and part-time FTEF in column 7. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the full-time faculty utilized (FTEF). Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2008 semester.

AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008



FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

ACC 159.6 19.9 8.0 6.2 1.8 1.0ADJ 22.2 19.9 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.2ARA 37.5 19.9 1.9 1.0 0.9 1.5ARC 43.9 15.4 2.9 0.9 2.0 1.0ART 195.0 19.9 9.8 8.5 1.3 5.2AST 8.0 19.9 0.4 1.2 -0.8 0.8AUB 13.9 15.4 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.3AUT 78.3 15.4 5.1 4.9 0.2 3.3BIO 320.5 26.5 12.1 6.1 6.0 5.9BLD 34.8 15.4 2.3 0.8 1.5 0.7BUS 131.4 19.9 6.6 5.2 1.4 1.8CHD 83.2 19.9 4.2 2.8 1.4 1.2CHI 8.1 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 1.1CHM 131.2 26.5 5.0 3.3 1.7 2.1CIV 12.2 15.4 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.6CON 12.0 19.9 0.6 1.2 -0.6 0.0CSC 40.6 26.5 1.5 1.3 0.2 0.9DEVE* 263.5 19.9 13.2 4.8 8.4 6.7DEVM** 160.1 19.9 8.0 2.5 5.5 3.7DRF 34.2 15.4 2.2 0.8 1.4 1.3ECO 109.3 26.5 4.1 1.3 2.8 3.4EDU 6.3 19.9 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.2EGR 15.1 15.4 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.9ENG 393.9 26.5 14.9 10.6 4.3 8.3ESL 647.1 23.2 27.9 15.2 12.7 16.3FIN 11.2 19.9 0.6 0.8 -0.2 0.0FRE 38.8 19.9 1.9 3.5 -1.6 1.2GEO 19.8 26.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.2GER 6.3 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5

73

AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)





GOL 55.8 26.5 2.1 0.9 1.2 1.7GRE 3.2 19.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4HIN 3.3 19.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3HIS 292.2 26.5 11.0 4.8 6.2 7.4HLT 1.8 11.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3HMS 21.2 19.9 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.6HUM 6.9 26.5 0.3 0.4 -0.1 0.1ITA 15.5 19.9 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.1ITD 23.2 19.9 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.6ITE 151.6 19.9 7.6 4.6 3.0 2.0ITN 67.7 19.9 3.4 4.3 -0.9 1.9ITP 52.3 19.9 2.6 4.5 -1.9 0.4JPN 48.5 19.9 2.4 1.0 1.4 1.8LAT 7.4 19.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2LBR 0.8 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1LGL 80.2 19.9 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.4MKT 18.8 19.9 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.6MTH 284.2 26.5 10.7 5.7 5.0 5.6MUS 73.9 19.9 3.7 4.1 -0.4 3.1NAS 97.3 15.4 6.3 1.3 5.0 2.4PED 108.9 26.5 4.1 1.5 2.6 2.8PHI 41.9 26.5 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.4PHT 82.1 19.9 4.1 3.0 1.1 1.9PHY 65.5 26.5 2.5 1.8 0.7 1.2PLS 47.5 26.5 1.8 1.4 0.4 2.0PSY 214.0 26.5 8.1 3.5 4.6 7.2REA 5.2 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5REL 18.3 26.5 0.7 1.3 -0.6 0.4RUS 19.5 19.9 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.9SDV 70.1 26.5 2.6 0.1 2.5 2.7SOC 64.8 26.5 2.4 1.9 0.5 1.2SPA 121.7 19.9 6.1 3.5 2.6 3.3SPD 155.4 26.5 5.9 3.8 2.1 3.6VTN 6.7 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5

74

AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008




ACC 223.6 19.9 11.2 5.0 6.2 3.4ADJ 126.2 19.9 6.3 5.0 1.3 2.1ARA 29.2 19.9 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.7ARC 54.6 15.4 3.5 2.1 1.4 0.7ART 208.8 19.9 10.5 7.2 3.3 7.9ASL 95.6 19.9 4.8 1.6 3.2 3.6BIO 608.0 26.5 22.9 8.0 14.9 10.9BUS 213.8 19.9 10.7 5.6 5.1 4.4CHI 14.6 19.9 0.7 0.9 -0.2 0.3CHM 162.6 26.5 6.1 4.3 1.8 3.1CSC 88.2 26.5 3.3 3.5 -0.2 0.7DEVE* 548.1 19.9 27.5 10.3 17.2 15.4DEVM** 385.8 19.9 19.4 8.3 11.1 5.5DIT 42.0 11.0 3.8 0.2 3.6 1.0DRF 23.2 15.4 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.3ECO 249.6 26.5 9.4 4.0 5.4 3.0EDU 3.2 19.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0EGR 88.5 15.4 5.7 5.2 0.5 0.6ENG 823.3 26.5 31.1 22.4 8.7 18.0ENV 2.2 15.4 0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.0ESL 546.7 23.2 23.6 16.0 7.6 11.0ETR 7.5 15.4 0.5 0.8 -0.3 0.3FIN 14.2 19.9 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.6FRE 35.1 19.9 1.8 0.0 1.8 1.9FST 25.2 19.9 1.3 1.4 -0.1 0.0GEO 7.0 26.5 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4GER 17.2 19.9 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.1GOL 58.1 26.5 2.2 2.1 0.1 0.8HIS 516.4 26.5 19.5 8.8 10.7 6.2HRI 96.2 19.9 4.8 3.0 1.8 1.9HUM 31.6 26.5 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.8INT 20.4 19.9 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.8ITD 27.0 19.9 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.2ITE 323.3 19.9 16.2 9.6 6.6 4.8ITN 61.3 19.9 3.1 2.6 0.5 0.8ITP 45.4 19.9 2.3 1.4 0.9 1.6KOR 14.7 19.9 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.7MKT 54.6 19.9 2.7 0.4 2.3 2.2MSC 2.3 26.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1MTH 759.5 26.5 28.7 18.9 9.8 11.0

75

AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)




MUS 89.8 19.9 4.5 6.7 -2.2 1.2NAS 230.1 15.4 14.9 4.3 10.6 4.3PED 214.9 26.5 8.1 3.0 5.1 4.4PHI 110.6 26.5 4.2 3.6 0.6 1.8PHY 99.7 26.5 3.8 3.1 0.7 1.5PLS 45.2 26.5 1.7 1.2 0.5 0.4PSY 378.6 26.5 14.3 5.2 9.1 4.0REA 8.3 19.9 0.4 0.7 -0.3 0.3REL 12.6 26.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.6RPK 16.9 19.9 0.8 1.5 -0.7 0.1SDV 115.1 26.5 4.3 0.0 4.3 2.8SOC 180.8 26.5 6.8 3.2 3.6 3.3SPA 135.6 19.9 6.8 4.0 2.8 3.0SPD 333.2 26.5 12.6 10.4 2.2 4.0TRV 27.4 19.9 1.4 1.7 -0.3 1.3


76

LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008




ACC 113.2 19.9 5.7 2.2 3.5 2.4ARA 11.3 19.9 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.5ART 158.3 19.9 8.0 5.9 2.1 5.9BIO 159.5 26.5 6.0 2.5 3.5 2.7BUS 113.0 19.9 5.7 1.4 4.3 3.2CHD 40.4 19.9 2.0 1.4 0.6 1.8CHM 80.1 26.5 3.0 1.6 1.4 1.6CSC 39.9 26.5 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5DEVE* 220.9 19.9 11.1 6.0 5.1 4.8DEVM** 193.4 19.9 9.7 3.2 6.5 4.5ECO 124.6 26.5 4.7 2.2 2.5 2.4EDU 2.8 19.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2ENG 341.3 26.5 12.9 7.4 5.5 8.0ENV 5.6 15.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0ESL 193.7 23.2 8.3 3.7 4.6 6.0FIN 7.4 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4FRE 9.8 19.9 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5GEO 59.0 26.5 2.2 1.6 0.6 1.8GER 6.3 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3GIS 7.5 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 1.0GOL 78.9 26.5 3.0 2.4 0.6 1.1HIS 281.6 26.5 10.6 5.2 5.4 5.0HLT 6.6 11.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.2HRT 34.1 15.4 2.2 2.5 -0.3 0.3HUM 14.4 26.5 0.5 0.8 -0.3 0.0IDS 43.8 19.9 2.2 2.1 0.1 1.0ITA 11.7 19.9 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.5ITD 7.4 19.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2ITE 124.0 19.9 6.2 1.8 4.4 3.8ITN 26.3 19.9 1.3 2.3 -1.0 0.2ITP 15.8 19.9 0.8 0.2 0.6 0.5MKT 16.0 19.9 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.2MTH 300.8 26.5 11.4 6.7 4.7 6.0MUS 49.5 19.9 2.5 5.6 -3.1 2.5NAS 58.4 15.4 3.8 0.3 3.5 2.1PED 63.5 26.5 2.4 0.7 1.7 1.9PHI 17.6 26.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.6PLS 30.4 26.5 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.2PSY 187.6 26.5 7.1 3.6 3.5 3.8

77

LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)




REL 19.8 26.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.2SDV 35.1 26.5 1.3 0.1 1.2 1.1SOC 57.4 26.5 2.2 0.0 2.2 2.0SPA 64.7 19.9 3.3 1.4 1.9 1.5SPD 120.2 26.5 4.5 1.8 2.7 3.4VET 69.3 11.0 6.3 3.6 2.7 0.2


78

MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008




ACC 51.8 19.9 2.6 2.0 0.6 0.4ADJ 65.2 19.9 3.3 1.0 2.3 2.6ARA 4.7 19.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3ART 84.3 19.9 4.2 3.7 0.5 1.3AUT 78.9 15.4 5.1 3.1 2.0 2.1BIO 171.7 26.5 6.5 3.2 3.3 3.5BUS 66.4 19.9 3.3 1.0 2.3 2.2CHD 43.0 19.9 2.2 2.8 -0.6 0.2CHI 6.3 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.7CHM 43.8 26.5 1.7 1.3 0.4 1.4CSC 26.2 26.5 1.0 1.2 -0.2 0.2DEVE* 197.5 19.9 9.9 4.5 5.4 5.6DEVM** 140.4 19.9 7.1 3.1 4.0 3.5DSL 5.3 15.4 0.3 0.5 -0.2 0.0ECO 80.6 26.5 3.0 0.8 2.2 1.6EDU 17.6 19.9 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.4ENG 230.2 26.5 8.7 4.0 4.7 5.9ENV 0.3 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3ESL 122.7 23.2 5.3 2.0 3.3 6.0FIN 6.2 19.9 0.3 0.6 -0.3 0.0FRE 8.2 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.5GEO 6.0 26.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2GOL 11.2 26.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.5HIS 152.6 26.5 5.8 3.2 2.6 1.8HLT 5.2 11.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.2ITE 76.2 19.9 3.8 2.6 1.2 0.8ITN 8.8 19.9 0.4 0.7 -0.3 0.0ITP 15.7 19.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2MKT 2.2 19.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2MTH 169.1 26.5 6.4 5.2 1.2 2.3MUS 6.0 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3NAS 18.1 15.4 1.2 0.3 0.9 0.3PED 39.6 26.5 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.7PHI 9.8 26.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2PHY 24.0 26.5 0.9 1.1 -0.2 0.5PLS 19.6 26.5 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.4PSY 139.4 26.5 5.3 2.6 2.7 3.0REL 6.4 26.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4

79

MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)




SDV 48.1 26.5 1.8 0.0 1.8 1.4SOC 30.8 26.5 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.6SPA 63.4 19.9 3.2 1.4 1.8 1.7SPD 96.0 26.5 3.6 3.6 0.0 1.4WEL 8.1 15.4 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0


80

MEC: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline – Fall 2008




DMS* 5.4 --- --- 0.6 --- 0.0DNH 80.1 11.0 7.3 2.4 4.9 0.7EMS 102.9 11.0 9.4 4.5 4.9 2.1HIM* 50.1 --- --- 2.8 --- 0.8HLT 91.2 11.0 8.3 0.8 7.5 3.1MDL 21.2 11.0 1.9 1.3 0.6 0.6NUR 344.1 11.0 31.3 7.3 24.0 1.1PTH 53.7 11.0 4.9 0.4 4.5 1.2RAD 99.7 11.0 9.1 3.7 5.4 0.2ROC 5.8 11.0 0.5 0.7 -0.2 0.0RTH 31.3 11.0 2.8 1.2 1.6 1.5SDV 32.5 26.5 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.9

*New Discipline --- Data is not available.

81

WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008




ACC 171.2 19.9 8.6 6.4 2.2 5.0ADJ 85.7 19.9 4.3 2.4 1.9 3.5AIR 84.4 15.4 5.5 3.1 2.4 2.1ARA 5.7 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3ART 96.5 19.9 4.8 2.6 2.2 2.5AST 31.4 19.9 1.6 5.2 -3.6 0.0BIO 170.1 26.5 6.4 1.6 4.8 3.7BUS 200.4 19.9 10.1 3.8 6.3 9.0CHM 32.3 26.5 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.5CSC 18.8 26.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.0DEVE* 243.7 19.9 12.2 4.9 7.3 6.0DEVM** 148.7 19.9 7.5 3.3 4.2 4.2ECO 71.8 26.5 2.7 0.8 1.9 1.8ENG 337.0 26.5 12.7 8.8 3.9 8.0ESL 140.7 23.2 6.1 7.7 -1.6 1.0ETR 11.0 15.4 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0FIN 15.8 19.9 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.2FRE 6.0 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.7GEO 6.8 26.5 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4GER 23.9 19.9 1.2 0.0 1.2 3.5GOL 20.4 26.5 0.8 1.1 -0.3 0.0HIS 241.8 26.5 9.1 4.2 4.9 3.6HLT 14.1 11.0 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.3HUM 21.0 26.5 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.6ITD 23.8 19.9 1.2 0.8 0.4 1.6ITE 173.6 19.9 8.7 6.0 2.7 4.9ITN 39.2 19.9 2.0 3.8 -1.8 2.0ITP 45.4 19.9 2.3 1.5 0.8 3.8LBR 1.4 19.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1MEC 6.0 15.4 0.4 0.5 -0.1 0.0MKT 14.8 19.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.6MTH 181.0 26.5 6.8 7.3 -0.5 1.6MUS 6.5 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.7NAS 60.0 15.4 3.9 1.1 2.8 0.8PBS 3.8 19.9 0.2 0.6 -0.4 2.4PED 48.3 26.5 1.8 0.9 0.9 0.9PHI 9.4 26.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2PHT 29.6 19.9 1.5 1.4 0.1 1.2PHY 18.7 26.5 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.5

82

WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)




PLS 17.2 26.5 0.6 0.0 0.6 1.0PSY 165.2 26.5 6.2 3.8 2.4 2.8REA 5.3 19.9 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3REL 15.0 26.5 0.6 0.0 0.6 1.6SDV 48.5 26.5 1.8 0.5 1.3 1.6SOC 90.6 26.5 3.4 2.0 1.4 1.2SPA 143.1 19.9 7.2 3.3 3.9 4.9SPD 152.6 26.5 5.8 4.3 1.5 3.8


NOVA Mission and Strategic Goals: 2005 – 2015

Mission The mission of Northern Virginia Community College is to respond to the educational needs of its dynamic and diverse constituencies through an array of comprehensive programs and services that facilitate learning and workforce development in an environment of open access and lifelong educational opportunities.

Strategic Goals

I. STUDENT SUCCESS - Northern Virginia Community College will move into the top tier of community colleges with respect to the retention, graduation, transfer, and career placement of its students.

II. ACCESS – Northern Virginia Community College will increase the number and diversity

of students being served to mirror the population growth of the region.

III. TEACHING AND LEARNING – Northern Virginia Community College will focus on student success by creating an environment of world-class teaching and learning.

IV. EXCELLENCE — Northern Virginia Community College will develop ten focal points of

excellence in its educational programs and services that will be benchmarked to being the best in the nation and strategic to building the college's overall reputation for quality.

V. LEADERSHIP – Northern Virginia Community College will serve as a catalyst and a

leader in developing educational and economic opportunities for all Northern Virginians and in maintaining the quality of life and economic competitiveness of the region.

VI. PARTNERSHIPS – Northern Virginia Community College will develop strategic

partnerships to create gateways of opportunity and an integrated educational system for Northern Virginians who are pursuing the American Dream.

VII. RESOURCES – Northern Virginia Community College will increase its annual funding

by $100 million and expand its physical facilities by one million square feet in new construction. This includes the establishment of two additional campuses in Western Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, as well as additional education and training facilities in or near established population centers.

selected trend data on disciplines: fall 2004 to fall 2008fall 2004 to fall 2008, is displayed for...

Documents