september 2014 state board of ed review
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: September 2014 State Board of Ed Review](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080100/568c56871a28ab4916c6fb3e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
An Increase in Student Academic Growth!
The NC State Board and NC DPI recently changed the weighting of grades for
honors and AP/IB courses, with changes being implemented with the Fresh-
man Class of 2015-16.
The SBE is currently discussing another change regarding grade calculations
for GPA and changing the current grading scale/system. North Carolina current-
ly uses the 7-point grading scale, with some LEAs using +/- as well. As the pos-
sible grading scale may change, NCAE would like to provide the teacher voice.
Please take a moment and complete the following survey by September 22,
2014.
NCAE SBE Review MORE REVISONS LIKELY WITH GRADING SCALE
Issues Session:
Received an update on
the Gifted Education
and Advanced Place-
ment Programs.
Received information
and viewed a new
training video for Safe
and Healthy Schools.
Provided updates on
PowerSchool. All 115
LEAs are connected and
using the tools of
HomeBase.
Received information
on the Biennium Budg-
et process for next cy-
cle. The SBE can net a
2 percent expansion.
This will be part of the
Fall SBE retreat in Oc-
tober.
Thanks to the dedicated educators, hard
working students and supportive families
students in North Carolina made gains in
their academic growth. Almost 75 percent
of the schools met or exceeded their
growth goals.
Graduation 4-Year Cohort Rate
All Students 83.8%
Male Students 80.2%
Female Students 87.6%
LEP Students 51.8%
Special Needs 64.4%
AIG 95%
State Performance Levels
In March 2014, the SBE adopted five aca-
demic achievement levels for reporting
student performance on the EOGs and
EOCs. The additional level allows for
demonstration of not only being proficient
but college/career ready. Students mak-
ing a Level 3 and above means grade–level
proficiency and Level 4 and above
demonstrates meeting the college-and-
career readiness standard.
Statewide on all assessments, the percent
of college/career ready is 46.2 and the
percent of grade-level proficiency is 56.3.
There is a slight increase in the success
rate of eleventh-graders who took the ACT
this year; with 59.3 percent meeting the
minimum requirement score. Students
who participated in the ACT WorkKeys
earned a silver certificate or higher, 68
percent. High school students successful-
ly completing Math III was more than 95
percent. High schools implementing more
rigor using the Graduation Project was at
44.2 percent this year.
School Accountability Growth 2013-14
Results were presented for 2,422 of the
2,565 public schools that participated in
the statewide testing program.
Exceeded Expected Growth 31.8
Met Growth 42.9
Did Not Meet Growth 25.4
September 2014
Accountability
Performance Results can
be found by schools:
http://goo.gl/z05x84
![Page 2: September 2014 State Board of Ed Review](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080100/568c56871a28ab4916c6fb3e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
In June, the SBE approved new licensure requirements for elementary and exceptional children candidates.
The new assessments for earning an Elementary and Special Education: General Curriculum license begins
October 1, 2014.
Approved tests with cut scores:
NCAE SBE Review Page 2
NCAE SBE Review September 2014
New licensure exams cut scores adopted
Pearson Test 090 - Foundations of Reading Score for next two years = 229
Pearson General Curriculum for North Carolina
Subtest 103 - Multi-subjects
Score for next two years = 227
Pearson General Curriculum for North Carolina
Subtest 203 - Mathematics
Score for next two years = 227
As North Carolina continues to support educators with 21st Century tools, one process that has been developed is a
Global Digital Badge. A proposed policy was discussed during the SBE meeting in September
and will be voted on in October. Recommendations provide the criteria and process for
teachers to earn the Global Educator Badge for Teachers. The recommendation is that the
Global Educator Badge for Teachers designation be available beginning in January 2015.
Candidates for the Global Educator Digital Badge will develop a Professional Development
Growth Plan utilizing the recommended process from the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. The teacher,
along with their principal, will review the teacher’s evaluation specific to the global awareness elements reflected in
the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards I, II, III, IV and V. Based upon this evaluation, the teacher and
principal will establish a professional development plan to move teachers on the continuum to embedding global
education in their instructional practices, while addressing the alignment to the North Carolina Standard Course of
Study. The completion of the proposed 100 hours or 10 CEUs global education professional development and the
Capstone Project (including acceptance into HomeBase as a state wide resource) must occur within two years of the
goals documentation. Global education professional development hours may count towards regular license renewal
requirements as general renewal credits. When the teacher has satisfied all requirements, a digital badge will be
issued at the state level and the designation will be documented in the Home Base Educator’s Professional De-
velopment Profile.
There will be more guidance and technical assistance to provide information on LEA implementation and address
questions regarding professional development including, how global education professional development earned
prior to this proposed policy may be recognized, the review of the Capstone Project within Home Base, and how to
address the time element, should a teacher not complete the process within the documented two years. As well as
how CEUs will transfer from one LEA to another. As of this discussion, the process is not a mandate but a profes-
sional development opportunity. Watch this video to find out more on a Digital Badge for Teachers http://youtu.be/
RDmfE0noOJ8.
Earning a Global Educator Digital Badge
![Page 3: September 2014 State Board of Ed Review](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080100/568c56871a28ab4916c6fb3e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards In January 2007, the State Board of Education ap-
proved new professional standards for the evaluation of teachers. The NCESS has been in place now since 2009.
Using these standards, rubrics and users guides, Teacher Leader Standards have been crafted and are aligned for
roles such as an Instructional Resource Teacher, Literacy Coach or Lead Mentor. The new standards are called
Teacher Leadership Specialists. The role of this specialist involves direct interaction with teachers for the purpose of
improving student learning and achievement. Research and Evaluation Associates worked with NCDPI staff and LEA
representatives to develop these instruments for the Teacher Leadership Specialist. Teacher Leaders will not have
direct involvement with students, but with the adults in the school. The DRAFT standards were discussed and will be
voted on at the October SBE meeting. Vice President Mark Jewell was on the design team.
NCAE SBE Review
NCAE SBE Review September 2014
North Carolina continues to move forward to ensure all
teachers have subject-specific student data to populate
Standard 6. Teachers responsible for grades three through
eight reading and math, as well as high school subjects in
Math I, English II, Biology and ACT, have used standardized
tests for decades. The standardized test results for growth are
now being used to populate Standard 6 to provide data for an
overall teacher effective rating that takes place at the end of a
three-year data period. This year, after two pilot runs in 2012-
14, the following specialty subject area teachers will have an
assessment process to provide data for Standard 6:
Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living
and PE, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages.
The State Board of Education and NC DPI have created a pro-
cess similar to National Board Certification components,
where teachers collect and provide evidence of student work
for specified subjects they teach that do not have standard-
ized tests. An overview of the process called Analysis of Stu-
dent Work (ASW) show the progression over the course of a
semester or a year.
For 2014-15 the State will have a full pilot implementation of
all impacted teachers. Advanced Placement, Arts Education,
Healthful Living and PE, International Baccalaureate, and
World Languages. More than 600 educators have been
trained across the state on what the process should look like
and how teachers will gather data within their subject areas.
Tentative Semester 1 Timeline
September 10 DPI will extract course code data from
PowerSchool
September 15 Teachers access schedule information
in ASW Platform to complete a prac-
tice validation of their schedules
September 15 – 26 Window for districts to correct teacher
schedule information
September 29 DPI will extract final course code data
from PowerSchool
October 1 Teachers access schedule information
in ASW Platform to complete the final
validation of their schedules*
* Teachers on a semester schedule will validate their second
semester schedule data in late January 2015
October 1 – 15 Teachers validate their schedules and
principals approve. Teachers receive
the classes for which they will collect
evidence
October 15 Final deadline for schedule validation
and class selection by the online
platform
October 15 – Jan. 2 Evidence Collection Window for
Semester 1
January 5 Semester 1 Student Selection/
Evidence Collection Window Opens
January 20 Semester 1 Evidence Collection
Window Closes
Special Subject Area Teachers and Standard VI
![Page 4: September 2014 State Board of Ed Review](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080100/568c56871a28ab4916c6fb3e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NCAE SBE Review September 2014
CHARTERS September 2014
News about public charter schools
1. Seventy-one charter school applications were received in the spring and the Office of Charter Schools
along with the Charter Advisory Committee selected 12 to receive approval for their planning year. The
State Board of Education approved the following 11:
Charlotte Lab School
Excelsior Classical Academy
Ignite Innovation Academy - Pitt
KIPP Durham College Preparatory
Patriot Charter Academy
PAVE Southeast Raleigh Charter School
Piedmont Classical High School
Queen City STEM School
Shining Rock Classical Academy: CFA
VERITAS Community School
Youngsville Academy
The charter school that was not approved by the SBE was North Carolina Connections Academy (a virtual charter school).
Applications rubrics and impact statements are located on the Office of Charter School webpage:
http://www.ncpublicschools.org/charterschools/resources/application/.
2. The SBE approved the process for a “fast-track” replication of high-quality charter schools.
3. The SBE approved Commonwealth High School, a charter school in Charlotte, to participate in the legislated
dropout prevention and recovery pilot program.
4. After much discussion and debate, the SBE approved the Virtual Charter School Pilot Program application
process and timeline. The SBE also repealed the SBE policy on the Establishment of Virtual Charter schools in
NC.
Since NC received Race to the Top funding, the State Board of Education has submitted
reports to the Joint Education Oversight Committee. The report, provided semi-annually, is
due September 15. The purpose of the reports is to share the Board's progress toward im-
plementing the “initiatives" which include 11 components in the state's Race to the Top (RT3) plan:
(1) Transition to new standards and assessments, (2) Establishment of an Instructional Improvement System,
(3) Establishment of the North Carolina education cloud technology infrastructure, (4) Full rollout and enhancement
of the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System, (5) Provision of performance incentives to teachers in the lowest-
achieving schools to improve recruitment and retention, (6) Establishment of regional leadership academies,
(7) Expansion of teacher recruitment and licensure programs to support low-performing schools, (8) Provision of ef-
fective teachers for schools through virtual and blended courses, (9) Provision of aligned professional development
and establishment of professional development system, (10) Expansion of District and School Transformation work to
turn around the lowest-achieving schools, and (11) Establish STEM thematic high schools and networks.
To review the Power Point on the implementation successes and lessons learned click RT3. This will be the last report to
the JEOC as this is year five of North Carolina’s RT3 4 year project with funding from the USDOE.
RT3 Update