si ali akdeniz triserinetrilactone 11.20.2015 · ali akdeniz, a mehmet gokhan caglayan,a,b pavel...
TRANSCRIPT
S1
Supporting information
Tri-serine tri-lactone scaffold for quantification of citrate in urine
Ali Akdeniz,a Mehmet Gokhan Caglayan,a,b Pavel Anzenbacher, Jr.*,a
___________________________________
a Department of Chemistry, Bowling Green State University Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
bDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
Contents
General S2
Preparation of Polymer chips S2
Synthesis S4
UV-Vis absorption titrations S10
Fluorescence titrations S14
Job`s plot experiments S19
NMR titrations S20
Sensor-Analyte complex study by Mass spectrometry S22
Qualitative analysis S23
Semi-quantitative analysis S24
References S28
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for ChemComm.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
S2
General
Synthesis of S1 and S2 was performed according to the literature procedures. Starting materials
are used without further purification. Standard laboratory techniques was performed in all the
synthesis. 1H- and 13C-NMR (APT) spectra were recorded using a Bruker® Avance IITM 500
MHz UltraShieldTM (Bruker Corporation, Mass., USA) Spectrometer at 25 °C. Mass
spectrometry studies were performed using Shimadzu LCMS-8030 liquid chromatograph mass
spectrometer (ESI) or Shimadzu Axima Performance MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. All the
optical measurements were performed in acetonitrile. Acetonitrile is dried over 4Å molecular
sieves. Optically dilute solutions (0.1 A) were used for all photophysical experiments.
Fluorescence emission spectra were acquired using an Edinburgh single photon counting
spectrofluorimeter (FLSP 920). Fluorescence titrations isotherms were calculated according to
previously published methods.1
Isotherms were constructed using emission maximum of each titration. Absorption spectra were
recorded using a Hitachi U-3010 spectrophotometer. All the optical measurements were performed
using a quartz cuvette with a path length of 1 cm at room temperature. The absolute quantum yields
were measured using a Hamamatsu Quantaurus absolute quantum yield spectrometer QY-C11347.
Preparation of Polymer chips2
The multi-well 10 x 21 (sub-microliter) glass slides were fabricated by ultrasonic drilling of
microscope slides (well diameter: 1000 ± 10 μm, depth: 250 ± 10 μm). Sensor solutions in polymer
solution (4% poly (ether-urethane) in THF w/w) were prepared. In a typical array, 200 nL of
sensor-polymer solutions were pipetted into each well of the multi-well glass slides and dried.
Then, water (400 nL) was pipetted into each well and dried to form hydrated gel matrix. Finally,
S3
analytes were added as aqueous solutions into each well and the chip was dried at room
temperature for 1 hr. Images from the sensor array were recorded using a Kodak Image Station
440CF (for preliminary experiments) and a Kodak Image Station 4000MM PRO (for qualitative
and quantitative experiments). After acquiring the images, the integrated (nonzero) gray pixel
value (n) is calculated for each well in each channel. Images of the sensor chip were recorded
before (b) and after (a) the addition of an analyte. The final responses (R) were evaluated as
indicated in the following equation:
Thus obtained data for qualitative analysis were then analyzed using Linear Discriminant Analysis
(LDA). Qualitative analysis was performed using Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm.
S4
Synthesis
(3S, 7S, 11S)-3,7,11-tris(tritylamino)-1,5,9-trioxacyclododecane-2,6,10-trione (1)3
(2S)-methyl 3-hydroxy-2-(tritylamino)propanoate (10 g; 27.7 mmol) and 2,2-dibutyl-1,3,2-
dioxastannolane (0.18 g; 0.61 mmol) are dissolved in toluene (200 mL) and refluxed for 3 days
under N2 equipped with a Dean and Stark device loaded 4Å sieves . All the solvent is removed.
The crude product is dissolved in CH2Cl2 and purification is achieved by column chromatography.
(SiO2; CH2Cl2 only). Compound 1 is obtained as a white powder (6.085 g; 6.1 mmol; 66%).
F: > 250 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.57 – 7.04 (m, 45H), 4.09 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 3H), 3.59
– 3.38 (m, 6H), 2.66 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H). 13C- NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.39, 145.29, 128.67,
128.06, 126.66, 71.36, 66.71, 54.40 ppm. MS (ESI) m/z: 1010.74 [M+Na]+.
(3S,7S,11S)-3,7,11-triamino-1,5,9-trioxa-cyclododecane-2,6,10-trione, trishydrochloride (2)3
Tri-serine tri-lactone (1) (4.85 g; 4.9 mM) is suspended in dry ethanol (80 mL). 2 mL of Acetyl
S5
chloride is added slowly into 10 mL of Ethanol over 10 min (exothermic). Acid solution is added
into slurry solution of 1 over 5 min. Reaction mixture is refluxed for 2 h. Resulting solution is
concentrated to 25 mL under vacuum. Precipitates are collected by vacuum filtration and washed
with CHCl3 (50 mL), EtOH (50 mL), and Et2O (50 mL). Product is a white powder. (1.75 g; 4.7
mmol; 96%). F: > 250 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.36 (s, 9H), 5.10 (dd, J = 12.4, 1.8 Hz,
3H), 4.59 (s, 3H), 4.31 (dd, J = 12.4, 2.6 Hz, 3H). 13C-ATP NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.40,
63.20, 53.01 ppm. MS (ESI) m/z: 262.03 [M+H -3Cl]+.
(3S,7S,11S)-2,6,10-trioxo-1,5,9-trioxacyclododecane-3,7,11-triyl)tris(3-(4- dimethylamino)naphthalen-1-yl)thiourea (3)
O
OO
O
O
O
-Cl+H3N
NH3+Cl-
NH3+Cl-
NC
S
N
O
O O
O
O
O
NHC
S
N
HN
NH
HN
HN
C
SN
HNC
S
N
TEA
DCM
(3S,7S,11S)-3,7,11-triamino-1,5,9-trioxa-cyclododecane-2,6,10-trione, trishydrochloride (2) (50
mg; 0.13 mmol) is suspended into CH2Cl2 with 4Å sieves. 120 mg of 4-Dimethylamino-1-naphthyl
isothiocyanate is added as CH2Cl2 solution. Reaction flask is stirred for 3 h at R.T. Resulting
solution is evaporated until dryness. Purification is achieved by column chromatography. (SiO2;
CH2Cl2 : MeOH : Acetonitirile (10 : 0.25 : 1)). Compound 1 is obtained as a white powder (35 mg;
0.04 mmol; 30.7 %). M.P. = 153 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.41 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.3
S6
Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54 – 7.45 (m, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.8
Hz, 1H), 6.35 (s, 1H), 5.25 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.15 – 4.05 (m, 1H), 2.78
(s, 7H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD3CN) δ 168.99, 151.51, 131.21, 129.28, 126.86, 126.00, 125.80,
124.69, 122.91, 117.35, 113.63, 64.94, 56.42, 44.37, 26.61. MS (ESI) m/z: 946.38 [M]+.
(3S,7S,11S)-2,6,10-trioxo-1,5,9-trioxacyclododecane-3,7,11-triyl)tris(5-(dimethylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonamide (4)
(3S,7S,11S)-3,7,11-triamino-1,5,9-trioxa-cyclododecane-2,6,10-trione, trishydrochloride (2) (50
mg; 0.13 mmol) is suspended into CH2Cl2 with 4Å sieves. It is dissolved as 0.2 mL of
trimethylamine is added. 120 mg of 5-(Dimethylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride is added
as CH2Cl2 solution. Reaction flask is stirred for 3 h at R.T. Resulting solution is evaporated until
dryness. Purification is achieved by column chromatography. (SiO2; CH2Cl2 : MeOH (10 : 0.6 )).
M.P. = 155 °C 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.56 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H),
8.24 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (dd, J = 10.8, 4.7 Hz, 2H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (s, 1H),
4.44 (dd, J = 11.3, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (s, 1H), 2.89 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126
S7
MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.94, 133.97, 131.24, 130.06, 129.75, 129.38, 128.86, 123.24, 115.49, 77.29,
77.04, 76.78, 66.01, 55.46, 45.47, 26.92. MS (ESI) m/z: 961.31 [M]+.
1H and 13C NMR Spectra of 1
3.09
6.36
3.00
53.8
7
2.40
2.65
2.67
3.44
3.45
3.46
3.47
3.51
4.07
4.09
4.11
5.32
7.27
7.27
7.27
7.28
7.29
7.29
7.30
7.30
7.30
7.32
7.33
7.34
7.34
7.35
7.47
7.49
7.49
S8
1H and 13C NMR Spectra of 2
1H and 13C NMR Spectra of 3
19.4
5
2.89
2.97
2.90
2.48
3.00
2.91
6.23
3.01
3.00
2.88
1.47
1.97
1.97
1.98
2.21
2.78
2.95
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.22
4.23
5.25
5.26
6.35
6.96
6.97
7.12
7.13
7.48
7.49
7.51
7.78
7.80
8.17
8.19
8.41
S9
1H and 13C NMR Spectra of 4
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.0f1 (ppm)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500AA121
102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180f1 (ppm)
-20000
-10000
0
10000
20000
30000AA121
S10
UV-Vis absorption titrations of S1
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
20M S1 + Acetate
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Abs
orb
anc
e
Wavelength, nm
20M S1 + Benzoate
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Abs
orba
nce
Wavelength, nm
20M S1 + Chloride
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
20M S1 + Citrate
Abs
orb
anc
e
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0
1
2
3
Abs
orba
nce
Wavelength (nm)
20 µM S1+ glutarate
200 250 300 350 400 450
0
1
2
3
Ab
sorb
anc
e
Wavelength (nm)
20 µM S1 + Maleate
S11
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
20M S1 + Malonate
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.520M S1 + Oxalate
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Abs
orba
nce
Wavelength, nm
20M S1 + Tricarballylate
S12
UV-Vis absorption titrations of S2
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.520M S2 + Acetate
Abs
orb
anc
e
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5 20M S2 + Benzoate
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Abs
orba
nce
Wavelength, nm
20M S2 + Chloride
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.520M S2 + Citrate
Abs
orb
anc
e
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Abs
orb
ance
Wavelength, nm
20M S2 + glutarate
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
20M S2 + Maleate
S13
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.520M S2 + Malonate
Abs
orb
anc
e
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.520M S2 + Oxalate
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
200 250 300 350 400 450
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavelength, nm
20M S2 + Tricarballylate
S14
Fluorescence titrations of S1
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1:31:2
(I-I
0)/(I
i-I0)
[Acetate] (M)
1:1
I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Acetate
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000
1
2
3
4
5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0
2
4
1:31:21:1
(I-I
0)/
(Ii-I
0)
[Benzoate] (M)I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Benzoate
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000
1
2
3
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ka = 8.32 x 104 M-1
(I-I
0)/
(Ii-I
0)
[Citrate] (M)
I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Citrate
360 400 440 480 520 560 600
0
1
2
0.00000 0.00002 0.00004 0.00006
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ka = 3.72 x 105 M-1
(I-I
0)/
(Ii-I
0)
[Glutarate] (M)
Glutarate
I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0.00000 0.00002 0.00004 0.00006 0.00008
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ka = 2.9 x 105 M-1
(I-I
0)/(I
i-I0)
[Maleate] (M)
I /
I 0
Maleate
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000
1
2
3
0 10 20 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ka = 2.25 x 105 M-1
(I-I
0)/
(Ii-I
0)
[Malonate] (M)I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Malonate
S15
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000
1
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ka = 2.08 x 105 M-1
(I-I
0)/(I
i-I0)
[Oxalate] (M)I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Oxalate
360 400 440 480 520 560 6000
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
[Tricarballylate] (M)
(I-I
0)/
(Ii-I
0)
I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Tricarballylate
Ka = 7.44 x 104 M-1
360 400 440 480 520 560 600
0.0
0.5
1.0
I /
I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Chloride
S16
Fluorescence titrations of S2
400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
I /
I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Acetate
400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
I / I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Benzoate
400 440 480 520 560 600 640
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I /
I 0
Wavelength (nm)
Citrate
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 I
/ I0
Wavelength (nm)
Glutarate-S2
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I / I
0
Wavelength (nm)
Maleate-S2
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I / I
0
Wavelength (nm)
Malonate-S2
S17
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 I
/ I0
Wavelength (nm)
Oxalate-S2
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I / I
0
Wavelength (nm)
Tricarballylate-S2
400 450 500 550 600 650
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
I / I
0
Wavelength (nm)
Chloride-S2
S18
Fluorescence titrations isotherms of S2
0.00000 0.00004 0.00008 0.00012 0.00016
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
[Glutarate] (M)
Ka = 2.08 x 104 M-1
I-I 0/
I f-I0
0 50 100 150 200
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
[Tricarballylate] (M)
Ka = 4.29 x 104 M-1
(I-I
o)/(
If-I
o)
0.00000 0.00005 0.00010 0.00015
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ka = 8.28 x 103 M-1
(I-I
0)/(I
i-I0)
[Citrate] (M)
S19
Job`s plot experiments Citrate - S1 and S2 Job`s plot in Acetonitrile Result: 1:1 Binding Result: 1:1 Binding
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0
5.0x103
1.0x104
1.5x104
2.0x104
2.5x104
3.0x104
3.5x104
4.0x104
citr
ate
Flu
ore
scen
ce
Citrate = [Citrate]/([Citrate]+[S1])
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0
2.0x104
4.0x104
6.0x104
8.0x104
1.0x105
citr
ate
Flu
ores
cenc
e Citrate = [Citrate]/([Citrate]+[S2])
Acetate – S1 and S2 Job`s plot in Acetonitrile Result ≈ 1 :3 Binding Result ≈ 1 :2 Binding
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0
5.0x103
1.0x104
1.5x104
2.0x104
Ace
tate
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Acetate = [Acetate]/([Acetate]+[S1])
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0
2.0x104
4.0x104
6.0x104
8.0x104
1.0x105
1.2x105
Ace
tate
Flu
ores
cenc
e
Acetate = [Acetate]/([Acetate]+[S2])
S20
NMR titrations
Titrations with S1
Figure.1 H NMR (500 MHz) titration of S1 (2 mM) upon the addition of Citrate as tri-tetrabutylammonium salt in CD3CN.
S1 only
0.25 eq. Citrate
0.75 eq. Citrate
1 eq. Citrate
1.25 eq. Citrate
1.50 eq. Citrate
0.50 eq. Citrate
S21
Titrations with S1
5.05.45.86.26.67.07.47.88.28.69.09.4f1 (ppm)
1
2
3
4
AA124-S2-titration 0 eq citrate4 4
AA124-S2-titration 0.5 eq citrate3 3
AA124-S2-titration 1 eq citrate2 2
AA124-S2-titration 3 eq citrate1 1
Figure. 1 H NMR (500 MHz) titration of S2 (2 mM) upon the addition of Citrate as tri-tetrabutylammonium salt in CD3CN.
S2 only
0.5 eq. Citrate
1 eq. Citrate
3 eq. Citrate
S22
Sensor-Analyte complex study by Mass spectrometry
Figure. (A) ESI mass spectrum of the complex of [S1+Citrate+Na+MeCN]-. Inset: Calculated
isotope pattern for [S1+Citrate+Na+MeCN]- (B) ESI mass spectrum of the complex of
S2+Citrate+TBA. Inset: Calculated isotope pattern for S2+Citrate+TBA.
S23
Qualitative analysis
Linear discriminant analysis (LDA)
Table. The jackknifed classification matrix of qualitative analysis of 8 analytes and a control by ing S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
Figure. The canonical scores plot of qualitative analysis of 8 analytes and a control by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
S24
Semi-quantitative Semi-quantitative assay for Citrate-Na in water
-20 0 20 40-40
-20
0
20
40
F2
(13 .
7%)
F1 (73.5%)
100 % Correct Classification in Water Control 10 M Citrate 20 M Citrate 30 M Citrate 40 M Citrate 50 M Citrate 60 M Citrate 70 M Citrate 80 M Citrate 90 M Citrate
Figure. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of Citrate-Na in hydrogel matrix. LDA shows the trend depending on increasing concentration of citrate.
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Calibration data set Validation data set
RMSEC=1.26 RMSECV=1.84
RMSEP=2.14
Pre
dict
ed
[Citr
ate]
(M
)
Actual [Citrate] (M)
Prediction of Citrate in Water
Figure.The result of the linear regression using support vector machine (SVM) affords quantitative analysis of various concentration of citrate. The plots of actual vs. predicted concentration show high accuracy of prediction for multiple analyte concentrations. Two unknown samples (red squares ■) were simultaneously correctly analyzed.
S25
Table. The jackknifed classification matrix of Semi-quantitative analysis of citrate tri-sodium salt by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
Figure. The canonical scores plot of Semi-quantitative analysis of citrate tri-sodium salt by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
S26
Semi-quantitative assay for Citrate-Na in 25 mM HEPES at pH: 7.4
Table. The jackknifed classification matrix of Semi-quantitative analysis of citrate tri-sodium salt in buffer solution by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
Figure. The canonical scores plot of Semi-quantitative analysis of citrate tri-sodium salt in buffer solution by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
S27
Semi-quantitative assay for Citrate-Na in Urine
Table. The jackknifed classification matrix of Semi-quantitative analysis of citrate tri-sodium salt in urine by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
Figure. The canonical scores plot of Semi-quantitative analysis of citrate tri-sodium salt in urine by using S1 and S2 in hydrogel matrix.
Jackknifed Classification Matrix
199.5 139.5 119.5 99.5 79.5 59.5 19.5 %correct
199.5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
139.5 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 100
119.5 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 100
99.5 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 100
79.5 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 100
59.5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 100
19.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 100
Total 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100
S28
References
1 A. K. Connors Binding Constants: the Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability; Wiley: New York, 1987. 2 Y. Liu, T. Minami, R. Nishiyabu, Z. Wang, and P. Anzenbacher Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7705. 3 R. J. A. Ramirez, L. Karamanukyan, S. Ortiz, and C. G. Gutierrez, Tetrahedron lett., 1997, 38, 749.