slides delay systems
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
1/23
Stick-slip Oscillations in Oillwell Drilstrings:
Distributed Parameter andNeutral Type Time Delay Model
Time Delay Systems
M. Belem Saldivar [email protected]
CINVESTAV Mexico /IRCCYN France.
Sabine Mondi [email protected]
Departamento de Control Automtico delCentro de Investigacin y Estudios Avanzados
del IPN, Mxico.
15-02-12
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 1 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
2/23
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Drilling system modelDistributed parameter model
Mechanical system model
Neutral type time delay model
DAlembert transformationFrequency domain analysisTorque on the bit model
3 Reduction of stick-slip phenomenonPractical strategiesManipulation of the weight on the bitManipulation of the damping at the bottom extremity
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 2 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
3/23
IntroductionOilwell drilling system
Oilwell drillstrings are mechanisms that play a key role in the petroleum extraction
industry.Failures in drillstrings can be signicant in the total cost of the perforation process.
Fig. 1. Vertical oilwell drilling system.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 3 / 23
http://find/http://goback/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
4/23
IntroductionNon-desired oscillations
The drillstring interaction with the borehole gives rise to a wide variety ofnon-desired oscillations which are classied depending on the direction theyappear.
Three main types of vibrations can be distinguished:
torsional (stick-slip oscillations),axial (bit bouncing phenomenon) and
lateral (whirl motion due to the out-of-balance of the drillstring).
The stick-slip phenomenon can originate problems such as: drill pipe fatigueproblems, drillstring components failures, wellbore instability.
Torsional drillstring vibrations are a source of failures which reduce
penetration rates and increase drilling operation costs.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 4 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
5/23
IntroductionStick-slip phenomena
Torsional drillstring vibrations appears due to downhole conditions, such assignicant drag, tight hole, and formation characteristics.
The stick-slip phenomena can cause the bit to stall in the formation while therotary table continues to rotate.
When the trapped torsional energy (similar to a wound-up spring) reaches a levelthat the bit can no longer resist, the bit suddenly comes loose, rotating andwhipping at very high speeds.
This stick-slip behavior can generate a torsional wave that travels up the drillstringto the rotary top system. Because of the high inertia of the rotary table, it actslike a xed end to the drillstring and reects the torsional wave back down thedrillstring to the bit. The bit may stall again, and the torsional wave cycle repeats.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 5 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
6/23
Distributed parameter modelDrilling system
The mechanical system is described by the following partial dierential equation
(Challamel, 2000):
GJ2v
2(, t) I
2v
t2(, t) v
t(, t) = 0, 2 (0, L), 0
with boundary conditions:
v(0, t) = t, GJv
(L, t) + IB2v
t2(L, t) = T
vt
(L, t)
where:
v(, t) is the angle of rotation,
is the angular velocity at the surface,T is the torque on the bit, L is the length of the rod,
IB is a lumped inertia (it represents the assembly at the bottom hole)
0 is the damping (viscous and structural)I is the inertia, G is the shear modulus and J is the geometrical moment of
inertia.(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 6 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
7/23
Neutral type time delay modelDAlembert transformation
Let the damping = 0. The distributed parameter model reduces to the
unidimensional wave equation: 2
v2 (, t) = p2
2
vt2 (, t), 2 (0, L), wherep =
pI/GJ. The general solution of the wave equation can be written as
v(, t) = () + (),
where = t + p, = t p, , are continuously dierentiable real-valuedfunctions. Observe that
v
t=
v
+
v
,
v
= p
v
p v
.
Then, the boundary conditions can be written as:
v(
0,t) =
(t) +
(t) =
(t),
v
(L, t) = p
(t + ) p
(t ) = IB
GJ
2
2(t + ) +
2
2(t )
1
GJ
T(t), = pL.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 7 / 23
http://find/http://goback/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
8/23
Neutral type time delay modelDAlembert transformation
Let
w(t) = v(L, t) = (t +
) + (t ).considering and as functions of t, we obtain:
(t) + (t) = (t), (1)
(t + ) + (t ) = w(t), (2)p(t + ) p(t ) = IB
G Jw(t) 1
GJT(t). (3)
Equation (2) implies(t + ) = (t ) + w(t). (4)
Substituting (4) into (1) and (3) we get:(t) (t 2) + w(t ) = (t) (5)
and
2p(t
) + pw(t) =
IB
GJ
w(t)
1
G J
T(t).
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 8 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
9/23
Neutral type time delay modelDAlembert transformation
Then, we have
(t) = 12
w(t + ) + IB2p
IGJw(t + ) + 1
2p
IGJT(t + ). (6)
Substituting (6) into (5), we get:
12
w(t + ) + IB2p
IGJw(t + ) + 1
2p
IGJT(t + ) 1
2w(t )
IB2p
IGJw(t ) 1
2p
IG JT(t ) + w(t ) = (t).
Finally we obtain:
w(t) w(t 2) +p
IGJ
IBw(t) +
pIG J
IBw(t 2) = 1
IBT(t) +
1
IBT(t 2)
+2p
IG J
IB(t ). (7)
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 9 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
10/23
Neutral type time delay modelFrequency domain analysis
By denition,
(v(, t)) = v(, s) =
Z0
estv(, t)dt.
where (v(, t)) is the Laplace transform of v(, t).
2
v(, t)t2
= s2 (v(, t)) sv(, 0) vt(, 0) = s2v(, s)
sv(, 0) vt(, 0),
v(, t)
t = s (v(, t)) v(, 0) = sv(, s) v(, 0),
2v(, t)
2
=
2(v(, t))
2=
2v(, s)
2,
v(, t)
=
(v(, t))
=
v(, s)
.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 10 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
11/23
Neutral type time delay modelFrequency domain analysis
Considering null initial conditions, the wave equation can be written as:
GJ2v(, s)
2= Is2v(, s) (8)
The general solution of (8) is:
v(, s) = v1(s)eqIGJs
+ v2(s)eqIGJs
(9)
where v1(s) and v2(s) are particular solutions to be determined. From theboundary conditions we have that:
v(0, t) = (t).
then, the boundary conditions are:
(s) = sv1(s) + sv2(s) (10)
GJv
(L, s) + IBs
2v(L, s) = T(s). (11)
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 11 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
12/23
Neutral type time delay modelFrequency domain analysis
The derivative of (9) is:
dv(, s)
d= v1(s)
sI
GJse
qI
GJs v2(s)s
I
GJseq
IGJs, (12)
substituting (12) into (11),
GJ
v1(s)s
IGJ
seq
IGJsL v2(s)
sI
GJseqIGJsL!
+IBs2
v1(s)e
qI
GJsL + v2(s)eq
IGJsL
= T(s)
or, in matrix form:s s
es(p
IGJs + IBs2) es
pIGJs + IBs2
v1(s)v2(s)
=
(s)T(s)
where
=qI
GJL.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 12 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
13/23
Neutral type time delay modelFrequency domain analysis
Then, the particular solutions v1(s) and v2(s) are:v1(s)v2(s)
= 1
D(s)
es
pIGJs + IBs2 ses(pIGJs + IBs2) s
(s)T(s)
where
D(s) = sh
esp
IGJs + IBs2 es(
pIGJs + IBs
2)i,
then,
v1(s) =es
pIGJs + IBs2(s) + sT(s)s
espIGJs + IBs2 es(pIGJs + IBs2)
=e2s
pIGJs + IBs2
(s) + sesT(s)
s e2s p
IGJs + IB
s2 (p
IGJs + IB
s2) ,
v2(s) =es(pIGJs + IBs2)(s) sT(s)
s
espIGJs + IBs2 es(pIGJs + IBs2)
=(pIGJs + IBs2)(s) sesT(s)
s
e2
spIGJs + IBs2 (pIGJs + IBs2) .
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 13 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
14/23
Neutral type time delay modelFrequency domain analysis
Let w(s) = v(L, s) = v1(s)es + v2(s)e
s. Substituting v1 and v2, yields
w(s) =2pIGJes(s) + T(s) e2sT(s)
e2spIGJs + IBs2 (pIGJs + IBs2) .
equivalently
w(s)h
e2sp
IGJs + IBs2 (
pIGJs + IBs
2)i
= 2p
IGJes(s)
+T(s) e2s T(s)
s2w(s) e2ss2w(s) + pIGJIB
sw(s) + pIGJIB
e2ssw(s) = (13)
1IB
T(s) +1
IBe2sT(s) + 2
pIGJ
IBes(s)
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 14 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
15/23
Neutral type time delay modelFrequency domain analysis
Finally, the neutral type time delay equation(7) is obtained through the inverseLaplace transform of (13).
1
s2w(s)
= w(t),
1 e2ss2w(s) = w(t 2),1 (sw(s)) = w(t),
1
e2ssw(s)
= w(t 2),1 (T(s)) = T(t),
1
e2sT(s)
= T(t 2),1
es(s)
= (t ).
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 15 / 23
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
16/23
Neutral type time delay modelTorque on the bit
The following switched equation allows to approximate the physical phenomenonat the bottom hole (Navarro & Corts, 2007):
T(w(t)) = cbw(t) + Wob Rbb (w(t)) sgn (w(t))
where Rb > 0 is the bit radius and Wob > 0 the weight on the bit.
The bit dry friction coecient b(w(t)) is modeled as
b (w(t)) = cb + (sbcb )e
bvf jw(t)j
where sb , cb 2 (0, 1) are the static and Coulomb friction coecients and0 < b < 1 is a constant dening the velocity decrease rate.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 16 / 23
S i k li h
http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
17/23
Stick-slip phenomenonSimulations of the neutral type model
Neutral type time-delay model (7) coupled to the model for the torque on the bitdescribes the drillstring behavior and the occurrence of stick-slip oscillations.
The model parameters used for the simulations presented in the sequel are:
I =0.095Kg m L =1172m cb =0.5
G =79.3x109N/m2 Rb =0.155575m sb =0.8
J =1.19x105m4 cb=0.03Nms/rad b=0.9
vf= 1 ca = 2000Nms
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 17 / 23
S i k li h
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
18/23
Stick-slip phenomenon
A simulation of the neutral type model of the drilling system (7) coupled with themodel for the torque on the bit with Wob = 97347N and = 10rad/seg is
shown.
Fig. 2. Stick-slip phenomenon. a) Velocity atthe bottom extremity. b) Torque on the bit.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 18 / 23
R d i f i k li h
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
19/23
Reduction of stick-slip phenomenonPractical strategies
According to drillersexperience, two practical strategies to avoid the stick-slip
phenomenon are: the reduction of the weight on the bit Wob and the increase of thevelocity at the surface . Simulations results of this model show an important reductionof the stick-slip oscillations by decreasing Wob from 97347N to 31649N (Fig. 3) and byincreasing from 10rad/s to 20rad/s (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3. Reduction of stick-slip phenomenon by decreasing Wob . Fig. 4. Reduction of stick-slip phenomenon by increasing .
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 19 / 23
R d ti f ti k li h
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
20/23
Reduction of stick-slip phenomenonManipulation of the weight on the bit
From eld data experience and from simulations of the model studied, it isconcluded that the manipulation of the weight on the bit can be a solution forstick-slip oscillations even for low velocities at the surface .
The variation of the weight on the bit is proposed in (Navarro & Surez, 2004) as
follows:Wob (w) = Kw jw(t)j + Wob0
with Wob0 > 0 and Wob > Wob0.
This expression captures the main characteristics of the weight on the bit. When
w(t) decreases, Wob decreases. As too low values ofWob would make drilling stop,the weight on the bit must be maintained at a minimal value Wob0 to insure adesirable rate of penetration.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 20 / 23
R d ti f ti k li h
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
21/23
Reduction of stick-slip phenomenonManipulation of the weight on the bit
Wob variation law can be substituted into model (7) for a drilling parameterscombination for which stick-slip oscillations are presented. This is the case of considering
= 10rad/s and Wob0= 97347N as it is shown on Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Reduction of stick-slip oscillations by means of considering the Wob
variation law.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 21 / 23
Reduction of stick slip phenomenon
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
22/23
Reduction of stick-slip phenomenonManipulation of the damping at the bottom extremity
Another strategy for reducing stick-slip oscillations is by increasing the damping at the
down end of the drillstring. This can be done modifying the drilling uid characteristics
(it could be approximated by means of increasing the damping coecient cb). Thebehavior of the velocity in the bottom extremity of the system (7) with the model for the
torque on the bit for dierent values of cb is shown on Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Velocity at the bottom extremity for dierent values
of cb (Nms/rad): a)0.8, b)15, c)65, d)150.(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 22 / 23
References
http://find/ -
7/28/2019 SLIDES Delay Systems
23/23
References
Challamel N., Rock destruction eect on the stability of a drilling structure,
Journal of sound and vibration, 233 (2), 235-254, 2000.Fridman E., Mondi S. and Saldivar M.B., Bounds on the Response of aDrilling Pipe Model. IMA J. of Mathematical Control and Information, 27,(4), 513-526, 2010.
Navarro E. and Surez R, Practical approach to modelling and controllingstick-slip oscillations in oilwell drillstrings, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEEInternational Conference on Control Applications, 1454-1460, Taipei, Taiwan,2004.
Navarro E., Corts D., Sliding-mode of a multi-DOF oilwell drillstring withstick-slip oscillations, Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference,3837-3842, New York City, USA, 2007.
Perreau P.J., Rey Fabret I.F., Gomel M.M. and Mabile C.M., New results inreal time vibrations prediction, 8th International Petroleum Exhibition andConference, Abu Dhabi, U.A.F., 190-199, 1998.
(DCA - CINVESTAV) 15-02-12 23 / 23
http://find/