state of the economy & credit union industry...5.8. 8.5. 12.6. 17.2. 7.8. 5.7. 5.8. 5.0. 5.5. 0....
TRANSCRIPT
Mike SchenkDeputy Chief Advocacy Officer and Chief Economist
Credit Union National [email protected]
State of the Economy & Credit Union Industry
5.8
8.5
12.6
17.2
7.85.7 5.8 5.0 5.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jan-60 Jan-64 Jan-68 Jan-72 Jan-76 Jan-80 Jan-84 Jan-88 Jan-92 Jan-96 Jan-00 Jan-04 Jan-08 Jan-12 Jan-16
A Dual MandateMisery index % (inflation rate + unemployment rate) // Source: BLS
Unemployment rate = 3.7%+ CPI headline inflation rate = 1.8%
Misery Index (July) = 5.5%
2.25
1.480
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
'60 '62 '64 '66 '68 '70 '72 '74 '76 '78 '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Perc
ent
Murderous!Market Interest Rates and Recessions // Source: Federal Reserve and NBER
Recession
Fed Funds (% left axis)
10-Yr Treasury (% left axis)
2.25
2.87
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
'60 '62 '64 '66 '68 '70 '72 '74 '76 '78 '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Perc
ent
Adjusted for Fed Quantitative Easing?Market Interest Rates and Recessions // Source: Federal Reserve and NBER
Recession
Fed Funds (% left axis)
10-Yr Treasury (% left axis)
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Jan-68 Jan-72 Jan-76 Jan-80 Jan-84 Jan-88 Jan-92 Jan-96 Jan-00 Jan-04 Jan-08 Jan-12 Jan-16
Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance 4-week Moving Average (SA) and Recessions // Source: BLS and NBER.
-0.3
0.3
0.8
1.3
1.8
2.3
2.8
3.3
3.8
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Unemployment Rate GapPercentage point difference between unemployment rate & low point of the 3-month centered moving average over past year // Source: BLS and NBER.
Recession Unemployment Gap
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
Jan-60 Jan-66 Jan-72 Jan-78 Jan-84 Jan-90 Jan-96 Jan-02 Jan-08 Jan-14
Residential Investment As a % of GDP // Source: BEA and NBER
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
'60 '62 '64 '66 '68 '70 '72 '74 '76 '78 '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Thou
sand
s of U
nits
New Housing Units StartedSAAR // Source: Census Bureau and NBER
Recession
New Housing Units Started
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
S&P 500 Monthly AverageInflation-Adjusted Index // Source: S&P
Recession Real
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
'82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Perc
ent
Leading Economic IndicatorsPhiladelphia Fed Index // Source: Moody’s, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and NBER
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Credit Union “Growth Gap”Year-over-year loan growth minus year-over year savings growth // Source: CUNA Monthly Estimates and NBER
Leading IndicatorsYield curve inverted? YES
Yield curve inverted due to Fed rate increases? NO
Initial Claims heading up? NO
Unemployment Gap > 0.3? NO
Consumer Sentiment > 10-point decline recently? NO
Avg Hourly Workweek (Manufacturing) declining? YES
ISM Manufacturing Index Below 43? NO
Stock Market Broadly Declining? NO
Sharply declining Residential Investment (as a % of GDP)? NO
Leading Indicators Index: ~2% decline over 6 months NO
CU Growth Gap: YOY Loan Growth < YOY Savings Growth? NO
-2.5
2.6
1.6
2.21.8
2.52.9
1.6
2.2
2.9
3.5
2.9
1.1
3.1
2.0 2.11.8
'09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '18Q2'18Q3'18Q4'19Q1'19Q2 '19 F '20 F
Whoa Horse!US economic growth – annualized percent changes in GDP // Source: BEA, CUNA
Slow economic growth• Well below the 2.8% norm• Partially due to tariffs, little chance of infrastructure spending etc.• Demographics dominate
1.1%
1.7%
2.7%
1.7%
1.2%1.0%
0.5%
50s 60s 70s 80s 90s 00s 10s
U.S. average annual civilian laborforce growthBy decade // Source: BLS
2.7%2.5%
1.2% 1.3%
2.0% 2.0%
1.1%
50s 60s 70s 80s 90s 00s 10s
U.S. average annual productivity growth Nonfarm business real output per person by decade// Source: BLS
1.62.5
1.71.2
0.7 0.5
2.4 0.61.7
2.0
1.1 1.3
1950-1973 1974-1981 1982-1990 1991-2001 2002-2016 2017-2027
Potential Labor Force Productivity4.0
3.13.4 3.2
1.8 1.8
Average annual % growth in real potential GDPSource: Congressional Budget Office
8.2
17.1
7.0
4.4
10.0
3.72
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 '19
Trends in US Unemployment Rates (%)Source: BLS and CUNA
Recession
U-6 Unemployment Rate
U.S
2.8
6.0
4.53.3
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Asian Black/African American Hispanic or Latino White
Unemployment Generally Down Across All Racial and Ethnic GroupsSource: BLS & CUNA
HELP!!!Source: BLS.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Unemployed (Millions) Job Openings (Millions)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
'60 '62 '64 '66 '68 '70 '72 '74 '76 '78 '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18
Perc
ent
Tame U.S. Inflation Year-over-year changes in CPI – All Urban Consumers SA // Source: Federal Reserve and NBER
10-Yr. Tsy = 1.48%- 10-Yr. TIPS = -0.06%Implied Inflation = 1.42%
Consumer Sector
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
S&P 500 Monthly Average(Source: S&P)
Recession
Nominal
Real
283.8
213.4
323.2
160.7
104.1
142.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Jan-87 Jan-90 Jan-93 Jan-96 Jan-99 Jan-02 Jan-05 Jan-08 Jan-11 Jan-14 Jan-17
Solid Housing Market Gains…S&P Case-Shiller National Home Price Index // Source: S&P
Nominal
Inflation-Adjusted
Nominal Changes:Up 4% over past yearUp 14% vs pre-recession levels
Real Changes:Up 3% over past yearDown -7% vs pre-recession levels
$14,450$15,628
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
Jan-80 Jan-86 Jan-92 Jan-98 Jan-04 Jan-10 Jan-16
Up to their eyeballs! Household debt. Billions of dollars // Source: Federal Reserve
124.2
90.8
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
Jan-80 Jan-86 Jan-92 Jan-98 Jan-04 Jan-10 Jan-16
Household Consumer & Mortgage Debt As a % of Disposable Household Income // Source: Federal Reserve
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
J-80 J-82 J-84 J-86 J-88 J-90 J-92 J-94 J-96 J-98 J-00 J-02 J-04 J-06 J-08 J-10 J-12 J-14 J-16 J-18
Household Debt Payments as a Percent of Disposable Income near All-Time LowSource: Federal Reserve
666692
684
400.0
450.0
500.0
550.0
600.0
650.0
700.0
J-80 J-82 J-84 J-86 J-88 J-90 J-92 J-94 J-96 J-98 J-00 J-02 J-04 J-06 J-08 J-10 J-12 J-14 J-16 J-18
Household Net Worth as a Percent of Disposable IncomeSource: Federal Reserve
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Consumer Confidence: Close to a 20-Year HighSource: Conference Board
Aug = 135.1
Business Confidence IndexSource: NFIB
July = 104.7 Up from 103.3 in June!
Real GDP: GermanySeasonally-adjusted change from year-ago // Source: Eurostat
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
Trade Wars: “Good and Easy to Win”?
“…according to our estimates, these higher tariffs are likely to create large economic distortions and reduce U.S. tariff revenues.”
New China Tariffs Increase Costs to U.S. Households.- Mary Amiti, Stephen J. Redding, and David E.
Weinstein. Liberty Street Economics. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. May 23, 2019.
II. Consumers & Members
63% 65%69% 70% 73% 75%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Percent of Families “Living Comfortably” or “Doing OK”Source: Federal Reserve Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households.
25% finding it “difficult to get by” or “just getting by” - 83 million people!
39% could not cover a $400 emergency expense
25% of non-retired have no retirement savings or pension
Consumer/Member Trends
• Rising income volatility • Reduced ability/willingness to save• 60% of households experience at least one financial shock per year• Unemployment/underemployment & debt burdens hit millennials hardest• By 2035, Americans aged 65+ will outnumber those under 18 with and most have little-to-no
retirement funds beyond SS.
• Rising income inequality and rising wealth inequality• Wages for the bottom 50% of earners are unchanged over the past 40 years.• One in five households have zero or negative net worth• Minority households hit hardest
• The uncertain future of work• Gig economy• Overall 20% of all workers today are contractors• 50% of contractors have no benefits!• Autonomous cars/sharing
Consumer/Member Trends: Implications
• Rising income volatility • Small dollar loans & payday loan alternatives more important• Members will gravitate to alternative financial services• Fewer working-age people will mean less demand for core CU financial services
• Rising income inequality and rising wealth inequality• Less access to budgeting tools and advice• Lower household formation rate/lower birth rate/aging population• Reduced ability to borrow & lower ability/willingness to own
• The uncertain future of work• FOM implications• Overall 20% of all workers today are contractors• 50% of contractors have no benefits!• Commerce Department reports ~16 million U.S. workers were employed in occupations that
could be affected by autonomous cars (to varying degrees) – one in nine workers…
www.cuna.org/economics
III. Credit Union Environment
CUNA Strategic Planning RoundtableExecutive Breakout Session (8/18/19)
Top challenges over the next year or two:• Slowdown in mortgage demand• Interest rate spreads/margins• Portfolio quality in a slowing economy• Membership growth/communicating value proposition
Top challenges over the long run:• War for talent• Cybersecurity• Staying relevant – especially on the technology front
Voting with their feet!Percent change in CU memberships (%) // Source: NCUA and CUNA
1.31.6 1.4
0.7
1.5
2.12.5
3.13.5
4.0 4.14.4
4.0
3.2 3.0
'07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 17 18 YOY'19/03
'19 E '20 E
6.5 6.7
1.2
-1.2
1.2
4.8
7.3
10.4 10.5 10.610.0
8.97.8 7.5 7.0
'07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 YOY'19/03
'19 E '20 E
Obvious meaningful interactions!Credit union 12-Month loan growth (%) // Source: NCUA and CUNA
7.9
10.0
20.9
12.9
9.1
1.3
12.4
6.1
8.5
16.0
12.7
10.3
3.5
12.4
7.9
7.3
16.8
12.4
9.8
3.5
14.4
9.1
8.5
13.1
10.2
10.1
7.0
14.0
7.5
6.9
11.7
9.1
9.2
7.0
12.0
7.7 8.
5
8.5
7.3 7.
9 8.1
11.7
Credit Cards Other Unsecured New Auto Used Auto 1st Mtg. HEL/2nd Mtg. Commercial
Broad-based but slower CU loan growth12-month growth within seven key portfolios // Source: NCUA and CUNA
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Mar '19
17,8
11
17,4
72
17,1
38
16,9
67
17,2
95
17,4
45
17,0
50
16,4
62
13,4
93
10,6
01
11,7
72
13,0
49
14,7
81
15,8
82
16,8
58
17,8
46
17,8
66
17,5
85
17,4
92
16,7
90
16,5
70
16,4
30
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Forc
2020Forc
2021Forc
U.S. Car and Light Truck SalesSource: BEA and IHS Markit. Thousands of Units.
IHS Market Forecast (Jul):• 2019: -4.1%• 2020: -1.3%• 2021: -0.8%
$1,7
55
$1,8
45
$1,2
61 $1,6
30 $1,8
91
$1,7
10
$1,6
43
$1,6
82
$1,6
83
$1,7
40
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Forc 2020 Forc 2021 Forc
U.S. First Mortgage OriginationsSource: Mortgage Bankers Association. Billions.
MBAA Forecast (Aug):2019: +15%2020: -9%2021: +1%
Credit Union Delinquency Rates: All Loans Percent of Period-End Loans // Source: NCUA & CUNA
1.00
0.88
0.75 0.740.82 0.80 0.76 0.72 0.73
0.68
0.93
1.37
1.821.75
1.60
1.15
1.01
0.85 0.81 0.83 0.810.71
0.58
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3/19
Credit Union Net Chargeoff Rates 1st Qtr. 2019 annualized. Percent of average loans. Source: NCUA & CUNA
0.57 0.58
0.470.40
0.440.50
0.54 0.51 0.510.44
0.49
0.81
1.201.14
0.90
0.71
0.540.47 0.46
0.520.56 0.55 0.57
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3/19
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
U.S. Unemployment Rate and CU Delinquency RateSource: BLS, NCUA, CUNA.
Recession Unemployment (Left Axis) Loan Delinquency Rate (Right Axis)
Loan-to-share RatiosFast loan growth & Slow savings growth (%) // Source: NCUA and CUNA
83.4 83.276.3
72.2 69.4 68.6 71.075.1 77.7 79.8 82.8 85.8 82.6
87.0 87.4
'07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 17 18 YOY'19/03
'19 E '20 E
Solid EarningsCU ROA in basis points // Source: NCUA and CUNA
64
31
18
50
68
8477 80
75 76 77
91 9587
80
'07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 17 18 YOY'19/03
'19 E '20 E
Three key operational wildcards
1. More obvious margin pressures
• Tight liquidity• Higher deposit rates• Lower loan growth• New Fed rules
2. More obvious pressure on non-interest margins
• Lower demand for fixed-rate mortgages?
• New York Times article – consumer-friendly fees at CUs?
3. Talent management
• Attracting & retaining• Differentiation• Operating expense
pressures
Advocacy Issues• Preserve the credit union tax status/bank attacks• Forward-looking, tailored consumer protection• Data security• CRA• DEI• Strengthen the housing finance system • Catching up to consumer expectations: TCPA• Cannabis banking for safer communities• Bringing federal credit union governance into the 21st century
Exam Issues• Bank Secrecy Act Compliance• Concentrations of Credit• Consumer Compliance
• New HMDA reporting requirements• MLA compliance• Regulation B’s notification requirements following adverse action taken on consumer
credit applications• Review overdraft policies and procedures for compliance with Regulation E
• CECL compliance progress/ALLL impacts• Information security maturity assessments with the Automated Cybersecurity
Examination Toolbox (ACET). • Will use ACET to assess credit unions with over $250 million in assets that have not
previously received an assessment.• IT risk management• Liquidity & interest rate risk
11,22510,862
10,53610,206
9,8989,574
9,2098,877
8,535 8,2687,966 7,708 7,486 7,236
6,9566,680
6,398 6,143 5,906 5,684 5,489
10,4
64
10,2
22
9,90
4
9,61
4
9,35
4
9,18
1
8,97
6
8,83
3
8,68
0
8,53
4
8,30
5
8,01
2
7,65
8
7,35
7
7,08
3
6,81
2
6,50
9
6,18
2
5,91
3
5,67
0
5,40
6
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
CU consolidation mirrors trends in the banking industryTotal number of institutions // Source: FDIC, NCUA and CUNA
U.S. CUs
U.S. Banks
-257
-363-326 -330
-308-324
-365-332 -342
-267-302
-258-222
-250-280 -276 -282
-255-237
-222-195
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Credit Union Consolidation: Annual Total Declines have been Slowing in the Past Few Years as More Small CUs Reflect Stronger Financials
(Source: NCUA and CUNA)
-2.2%
-3.2%-3.0% -3.1% -3.0%
-3.3%
-3.8%-3.6%
-3.9%
-3.1%
-3.7%
-3.2%-2.9%
-3.3%
-3.9% -4.0%-4.2%
-4.0% -3.9% -3.8%
-3.2%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Credit Union Consolidation: Annual Percentage Declines also have been Slowing in the Past Few Years
(Source: NCUA and CUNA)
Thank You!