status of zeus wolfram zeuner desy/hamburg for the zeus collaboration zeus operation shutdown...
TRANSCRIPT
Status of ZEUSWolfram ZeunerDESY/Hamburg
for the ZEUS Collaboration
• ZEUS Operation
• Shutdown Activities
• Physics Highlights
• Outlook & Summary
PRC open session November 10, 2005
ZEUS Operation
• Congratulation to the HERA crew for the best running period ! • HERA delivered 202pb-1
more than all HERA I
• HERA is able deliver to >1pb-1/day for extended periods of time
• ZEUS is in very good shape, almost all gated data can be used for physics
ZEUS Operation
• ZEUS gated 150 pb-1
• Efficiency: 74%
• ZEUS can record >1 pb-1/day• Recently typical efficiency ~80%
Weekly efficiencies 2004 and 2004/05
• DAQ very stable• Main source of losses: HV trips caused by p-beam spikes
ZEUS OperationRecent example: good and bad fillsDead time due to HV trips and enormous trigger rates
Luminosity lost by CTD trips
0
50
100
150
200
250
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45
Fill number (arbitr)
L[1
/nb
)
(Oct. 8 – Nov. 7):
p-beambackground
e-beam background
CTD current
Efforts to improve the p-beam stability are appreciated
good fill bad fill
CTD Trips
Shutdown Activities
• Forward Straw Tube Tracker (STT) has insufficient cooling Interferes with solenoid operation STT is off since Oct. 2004
• Adding cooling close to the solenoid should solve the problem.• Problem – have to remove FDET without breaking the beam vacuum
now
With add. cooling
700 Kg
CTD
SC coil (~4.5K)
pe
Shutdown Activities
Pull detector over the GO magnet with a special jigDesign has been reviewed by external engineersThe jig is ready and testedThe FCAL has to go off the bottom yoke onto extension rails ----------• The rest is standard repair and maintenance work• Keeping in mind that the detector has to run for ~16 month without major shutdown• Time schedule is ok
Physics Highlights
• HERA I data still being analyzed• All publications so far on HERA I data• First HERA II analysis close to publication
Summer conferences were very successful ZEUS: 42 contributed papers to LP05/HEP05 5 HERA II analyses
Report here:
• High Q2 Cross Sections with Polarized e+/e- Beams• Strong Coupling Constant from Inclusive Jets• Charm Fragmentation Ratios and Fractions• Factorization in Diffraction• Isolated Leptons
High Q2 Cross Sections with Polarized e+/e- Beams
Q2 > 200 GeV2, y < 0.9ZEUS DATA SAMPLE
HERA II
Right-handed Left-handed
e+ L=14.1 pb-1
P=31.8%
L=16.4 pb-1
P=-40.2%
e- L=6.5 pb-1
P=29.2%
L=35.3 pb-1
P=-25.9%
NC
CC
e- e-
High Q2 Cross Sections with Polarized e+/e- Beams Charged current cross section with polarized leptons
0)(Pσ)P(1)(Pσ/eecc/ee/eecc
Direct observation of the chiralstructure of the weak interaction
• Linear dependency on P clearly visible• Agreement with SM prediction No indication of WR
pb(syst.)0.5(stat.)1.622.50.402)(Pσ
pb(syst.)1.0(stat.)2.446.70.318)(PσCC
CC
e+p
e-p
pb(syst.)(stat.)1.986.20.406)(Pσ
pb(syst.)(stat.)3.554.60.292)(Pσ
2.2
2.6
1.1
1.4
CC
CC
First CC measurement as functionof polarization
Charged current cross sections with polarized leptons
Effect of weak interaction visible in diff. distribution over full phase spaceGood agreement with SM predictionCan be used to further constrain PDFs in QCD fits
e+pe-p
Neutral current cross sections with polarized leptons
Again good agreement with SMElectroweak effect starts to become visible
e+ e-
Strong Coupling Constant from Inclusive Jets
• Inclusive jets in Breit frame • Previous measurement is published• and used to extract αs
• Recently included in QCD-fit to reduce PDF uncertainties
• Now 2-fold statistics
• Prediction infrared insensitive • High precision measurement• Compare to NLO QCD (DISENT)
-1
JetBT,
22
81.7pbLdt
GeV8E,GeV125Q
Strong Coupling Constant from Inclusive Jets
(0.1182±0.0027)
Best value for Q2> 500 GeV2
Fit NLO QCD calc.
(theo.)0.0017
0.0029(exp.)
0.0025
0.0019(stat.)0.00110.1196)(Mα Zs
Precision comparable to any other single measurement
Charm Fragmentation Ratios and Fractions
Test universality of charm fragmentationMeasure: (+ anti-particles) in photoproduction (Q2< 1 GeV2, 130 <W < 300 GeV, pT(D,Λc) > 3.8 GeV)
D,Λ,D,D,D cs0
Calculate:Ru/d: Ration of neutral to charged D-meson production rate
γs: Strangeness suppression factor
Pdv: Fraction of D-mesons produced
in a vector state
f(cD, c): Fragmentation fraction of charm into D or c
)σ(σ2σγDDDs 0
s
KpπΛc
Charm Fragmentation Ratios and Fractions
Charged and neutral D-mesonsare produced with the same rate
Ratio of strange to non-strange is26% in charm fragmentation
57% of the charged D-mesonsare produced in a vector stateSmaller than spin countingprediction of 75%
Charm Fragmentation Ratios and Fractions
General good agreement with e+e-
Fragmentation fraction cD* is lower and cc is higher than in e+e- (correlated)
First measurement of in γpHighest precision single measurement
Universality of fragmentation is supported
Factorization in Diffraction
Exchange of colorless objectwith quantum numbers of vacuum
Cross section = Product of parton density function & hard scattering cross section
J.C. Collins showed that factorization holds in ep DIS Phys. Rev. D57 3051(1998),J. Phys. G28 1069 (2002)
Dijets in Diffractive DIS 22 GeV100Q5
GeV250W100pγ*
NLO Calculations DISENT + diffr. Extension
• Data consistent with ZEUS and H1 QCD NLO fit• GLP fit too low Shape of distr. not well described
• Sensitivity on diffractive PDF main uncertainty
• No indication of factorization violation
Factorization in Diffraction
Problem: CDF-Dijet rates factor 3-10 lower than expected, using HERA diffractive PDFs
Idea: Cross section suppression by second. interactions
Test at HERA with resolved photoproduction• photon fluctuates into hadronic system, which takes part in hadronic scattering similar to hadron interactions• prediction by Kaidalov et al res. γp cross section has to be rescaled by 0.34
Phys.Lett.B567 (2003),61 Dijets in photoproductionD* in photoproduction
Hard scale: ET of jet or charm mass
Diffractive γp Production of Dijets
Direct PhP Resolved PhP
1.5η1.5GeV,6.5EGeV,7.5E
0.025x
GeV1Q0.85,y0.2
Jet2T
Jet1T
p
22
• NLO overestimates data by factor 1.6• Shape reasonably described • Scaling the resolved component does not describe the resolved enriched sample
• No indication of factorization violation
Diffractive D* in PhotoproductionNLO does not overestimate dataopposite to dijetsShapes are reasonably described
No indication of factorization violation
Further studies needed:• Diffractive PDFs• PDF dependence of cross sections
Inclusive
eDiffractiv
Inclusive
eDiffractiv
σ
σ
NLO description of inclusiveand diffractive PDFs is consistent
0.6(Data/NLO)Dincl.
(Data/NLO)Ddiffr.
)s(Data/NLOincl.Dijet
a/NLO)Dijets(Datdiffr.
Isolated Leptons• SM process for isolated leptons with missing transverse momentum is single W production – cross section (LO) : 1.1pb
• SM background are DIS NC and CC an dileptons with some mis-measurement• The favorite exotic process with the same signature is single top production
Single top production
ZEUS all HERA I dataNo excess to SMNeither e+ nor e- Phys. Lett. B559,153 (2003)
1999-2000
New analysis • Measure W cross section• Cuts very close to those from H1• Analyse: HERA I e+ data from 1999/2000 HERA II e+ data from 2003/2004
Isolated e candidates PTX > 25 GeV
ZEUS (prel.) 99-00
e+p (66 pb-1)
Obs:1;
Exp: 0.92±0.09 (79% W)
ZEUS (prel.) 03-04
e+p (40 pb-1)
Obs:0;
Exp: 0.58±0.09 (76% W)
No excess to SM prediction
Both samples are described by MCSignal: SM W-production
Isolated Leptons
Outlook
• Reconstruction/Tracking very active field at ZEUS Well advanced: New pattern recognition combines CTD + MVD Kalman filter track fit and vertex reconstruction
Under development: Integration of forward tracker and wheels of MVD
Prelim.Impact parameter distribution of muons in γp
MVD tagged D+
Pushing the tracking at HERA IItowards the optimal performance
More and more analyses will profitfrom high precision tracking
Summary
• HERA finishes its best running period
• ZEUS is performing very well and has taken lots of high quality data
• The STT will be operational again after the shutdown
• Many new and interesting physics results Majority of results still from HERA I data HERA II analyses well advanced
• Looking forward to a successful data taking in 2006/07