sunrise mountain landfill 1999 administrative record ... · larry jensen, nws ron mcqueen. nws john...
TRANSCRIPT
POOR LEGIBILITY
ONE OR MORE PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE DIFFICULT TO READDUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL
-
Gale Wm. Fraser, II. P.E.General Manager) Chiel Engineer
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Lance M. MaloneCnairman
Clark County
Cresent HardyVice-Chairman
City of Mesqutie
Larry BrownCity ol Las Vegas
Jan Laverty JonesCity ol Las Vegas
Bryan A. NixCity ol Boulder City
John K. RhodesCity ol North Las Vegas
David Woodj. Cily of Henderson
Bruce L. WoodburyClark County
REGIONAL FLOOD COMTROL DISTRICT
SFUND RECORDS CTR
2095986TO: Distribution
FROM: Timothy E. Sutko, Senior Hydrologist
SUBJECT: September 11, 1998 Flooding
DATE: October 2, 1998
Attached please find a copy of the Rainfall Event Report for the September 11, 1998 event.Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require additionalinformation.
Distribution: RFCD Board membersRFCD TAG membersRFCD CAC MembersLarry Jensen, NWSRon McQueen. NWSJohn James, State ClimatologistMike Tumipseed, State EngineerBob Cullins, Emergency Management Coordinator, City of Las VegasJack Finney, Emergency Management Coordinator, City of HendersonBob Andrews, Emergency Management Coordinator, Clark CountyVicki Taylor, Public Information Officer, City of HendersonTom Warden, Public Information Officer, Clark CountyPhu Simpson, Clark County Community DevelopmentCurt Chandler, City of HendersonDennis Moyer, City of Las VegasLenny Badger, City of North Las Vegas
ffl
301 E. Clark Avenue, Suite 301 • Las Vegas. Nevada 89101(702) 455-3139 • FAX: (702) 455-3870
RAINFALL EVENT REPORTSeptember 11,1998
prepared byTimothy E. SutkoSenior Hydrologist
Clark County Regional Flood Control DistrictClark County, Nevada
Severe weather moved through the Las Vegas Valley and northeast Clark County beginning latein the morning on September 11,1998 causing wide-spread drainage problems and other damages.While the rainfall intensities and depths recorded in many parts of the County were not atypicalof warm season convective storms in the region, perhaps the most notable feature of this stormsystem was the size of the area which was impacted. Based on weather radar images it isestimated that 40% of the county may have received up to one inch of rainfall or more. Therainfall was accompanied by hail throughout much of the Las Vegas Valley as well as reports oftornadoes in the Henderson area. In the Las Vegas Valley the largest rainfall depths appear tohave occurred in the Green Valley area of Henderson and the east pan of the Valley extendingnorth to the Nellis AFB area. The Green Valley rainfall caused significant flow in Pittman Washand Duck Creek, perhaps the largest flows recorded in those drainages in recent years. On theeastside of the Valley, the Sloan Channel, Flamingo Wash, and Las Vegas Wash all experiencedsignificant flows. Flood flows from the entire Valley combined above Lake Las Vegas where thepreliminary peak flow is estimated to have been in the 7000-9000 cfs range.
The rainfall depths recorded in the California Wash and Muddy River drainages were far moreimpressive than those recorded in the Las Vegas Valley. For the twelve hour period ending atmidnight on September 11, four RFCD rain gages hi that area recorded in excess of two inchesof rainfall, and one of those recorded more than three inches of rain. The resulting runoff in theCalifornia Wash at the Hidden Valley Road may have been up to 10,000 cfs. This flow combinedwith flow in the Muddy River above Glendale and overtopped SR 168 at Glendale, washed outthe Gubler Avenue crossing of the Muddy River in Logandale, and caused some residentialflooding in Overton. There was one swift-water rescue which took place on Hidden Valley Roadas flood waters from the California Wash overwhelmed a delivery van which attempted to crossthe flooded dip-section.
This storm system moved generally from the southwest to the northeast across the southern andeastern portions of the Las Vegas Valley before moving into the California Wash and MuddyRiver drainage areas. In the Las Vegas Valley, rainfall began to move into the south end of theValley between 11:30 am and noon. At approximately 11:30 am, the National Weather Service(NWS) office issued a Severe Thunderstorm Warning for Northeast Clark County, including theMoapa Valley, Mesquite and Bunkerville. Shortly thereafter (11:50 am), a Severe ThunderstormWarning was issued for the Las Vegas Valley as weather radar indicated increasing rainfallintensities moving into the area and marble-sized hail was reported at the NWS offices. The firstFlash Flood Warning was issued by the NWS at approximately 12:15 pm. These warnings were
repeatedly extended and expanded by the NWS throughout the remainder of the day. District staffprovided updates to the local public works departments as the NWS issued or extended theweather statements. District staff also advised both Clark County Public Works and the ClarkCounty Sanitation District of the possibility of significant flows in lower Duck Creek as therainfall began entering the Las Vegas Valley.
Owing to the location and movement of this storm, most of the runoff occurred in streets andwashes and did not, with the exception of the Range Wash/Confluence Detention Basin andCarey/Lake Mead Detention Basin, enter any of the regional detention basins. Flow in the LasVegas Wash at Vegas Valley Drive was observed to have been within one foot of the maximumchannel capacity. The following listing presents estimates of the peak flows at various locationsin the Las Vegas Valley as determined by the US Geological Survey (USGS) and/or RegionalFlood Control District. These values are preliminary estimates and are subject to change as betterinformation is developed.
Location Peak Discharge
Pittman Wash at Wigwam Ave 1430 cfsDuck Creek at Eastern Avenue 650 cfsDuck Creek near Hollywood Blvd 3000 cfsFlamingo Wash at Decatur Blvd 130 cfsFlamingo Wash at Eastern Avenue 920 cfsFlamingo Wash at Nellis Blvd 1500-2000 cfsRange Wash Tributary at Las Vegas Blvd 920 cfsSloan Channel at Charleston Blvd 1230 cfsLas Vegas Wash near Sahara Ave 2240 cfsLas Vegas Wash below confluence with Flamingo
Wash 5000-8000 cfsLas Vegas Wash at Lake Las Vegas 7000-9000 cfs
The peak flow adopted for Flood Insurance Study purposes in the Las Vegas Wash at VegasValley Drive is 7100 cfs. Based upon these flow estimates, it appears that in some reaches ofthe Las Vegas Wash this event may have approximated a 100-year flood.
The lower end of Duck Creek experienced high lows for at least the third time this summer. Inthe vicinity of the Stadium Mobile Home Park, approximately 100 feet of block wall collapsed,an 18-inch water line and a sanitary sewer line ruptured, and almost 300 feet of a 28-inch naturalgas line was exposed by the flooding. At Lake Las Vegas, the rate of flow in the Wash farexceeded the capacity of the two by-pass pipelines and a large fraction of the Wash flow spilledinto the Lake. The two low level bladder dams were deflated and the lake drain was opened inorder to allow the storm flows to discharge from the Lake.
There have been numerous reports in the media regarding erosion in the Sunrise MountainLandfill area. Operators of the landfill have informed District staff that rainfall depths of 2.2-,2.25-, and 2.5-inches were collected by the three NWS-type rain gages located at the landfill site.While this type of gage does not record rainfall intensities, the operators stated that the rainfalloccurred in less than a one hour period.
The rainfall cells appeared to have intensified as they left the Las Vegas Valley to the northeast.Rainfall, flow rates and damages were higher in the Moapa Valley area than they were in the LasVegas Valley. While the rainfall in the Las Vegas Valley generally took place within a two-hourperiod, in the drainages impacting the Moapa Valley intense cells appear to have built and re-builta few times throughout the afternoon and evening. Four RFCD rain gages recorded more than2-inches of rainfall, and one of those recorded over 3-inches. Each of these gages recordedrainfall rates of 1.15 inches per hour or more. This rainfall generated flows in the CaliforniaWash which washed out 150-feet of the paved road east of the Byron exit from 1-15. At sometimeduring this storm, runoff was flowing over 1-15 in the vicinity of the rest area south of theGlendale/Moapa exit. Flows in the California Wash at Hidden Valley Road may have been in the7000-10,000 cfs range (the 100-year flow rate for the California Wash in this area is 14,600 cfs).A swift water rescue was successfully performed at this location by the volunteer Fire Departmentshortly before the driver's van was completed submerged by the flow. Flows in the Muddy Riveralso over-topped Hidden Valley Road on the northside of the Hidden Valley Dairy. The flowsin these two watercourses effectively isolated the dairy for over 12 hours.
Flows in the Muddy River overtopped the SR-168 bridge in Glendale and washed out the lowlevel crossing at Gubler Avenue in Logandale. According to the damage assessment preparedby the American Red Cross, thirteen homes in the Overton area suffered major damages and twomobile homes in the Glendale/Moapa area were destroyed by flooding. The preliminary USGSestimate of the Muddy River flows two miles below Glendale is 6500 cfs. The Clark CountyPublic Works Department has estimated that the area suffered approximately $400,000 in damagesto roadways.
While a significant amount of rainfall was not recorded by any of the District's rain gages locatednorth of Mesquite, this same storm system which impacted the Las Vegas Valley and MoapaValley must have moved through that area, as the water level behind the Jim Wilson (aka TownWash) Detention Basin rose to over 10 feet before receding. The Red Cross damage assessmentindicates that 5 homes in Bunkerville suffered major flood damages.
Attached to this report are summaries of the rainfall data collected by the District.
fcJ_-rfLJLJrftk'-"/aB3«*ife;''1
l.-''IW™W »*•#*_ t"'-./Sr&*o£L*V'* -••""'•'iT-ir.- ... -. • ,.»--:•-< ;t-.tj.T/.''fllT V'. '
\
0.162
<>•»>» ro. f— -.W-f "- IS? Q P(X"
^ 0.31" U<d$0
RAINFALL TOTALS (inches)FOR SEPTEMBER 11, 1998
t. .
u
R
Chann
man@
!739
ain
.80
5 -64
T .48nu .32it
7J34 .
ain
.80
T .48nu .32it
?! -16rv
^139 11PRR CHANNEL ( 1 . 3 4 " )
-ft4
iidKid nnr-K PRF.F.K AT RARTRRN ( i .^
;
t
4 7 3 4 P1TTMAN WASH AT WIGWAM (1.8
£
FC
T
_i
d
J
-
-III i rr • • • i •
rfln
h
-
ih,4744 SOUTH HENDERSON (1.30")
-
-
n
n P
.80
.64 1
.48 in
.32 uit
. 16 Re
3 9 D
rain ^Ck
e
.80 E
.64 *
.48 in
.32 uit
. 16 no/a
5 S
rain ^
Hende
HH2 409/98 DYll->
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
@
LV
2<8h
@
L
rain
i
.801 ^.FJ - 64ro >.«-.i .48nu .32itHe . 16/s
0
rain
.80
P^ • o 4
T .48nu .32it
n
4144 RANGE WASH AT LAS VEGAS BLVD (1.89"
r-
H
,4074 LAS VEGAS WASH AT LAKE MEAD
ruXL JL
T,!i
1.34")
rfhrT
-i
i • • • i •
4 2 8 4 LAS VEGAS WASH AT T.AMB (1 ,38 " )
r
r4379 VAN BUSKIRK DB (1 .38 " )
-j
•1
i
Oil • • i « •
i -
.eu
.48 5n
.32 uit
.16 ne
3/inv/itUJLJ t
rain
.80
.64 g
.48 Tn
3P n• JC. LI
^L 6 0
3
4379..
rain
L_V
wash
@
Va
Buskirk
H R 2 4 6 809/98 DYll->
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0
s
ch
.80
5 -64
m ._i -48
nu .32it
5a43R4
Jralnngo
8.80
1 C?
om .-.i . 48nU .32it
r\
4174 SLOAN CHANNEL AT CHARLESTON..1Q..U
-
'
4084 LAS VEGAS WASH NEAR SAHARA
?4 ' )
IP
(0 .
• i r
4 3 9 4 FLAMINGO WASH AT NELLYS (0.
-
1-94.
. • i i i
L
nH rTI . rL .
94"
, , , . r
4174 FT.AMTNfin WA^JH ^\T F)Ac;TPpN (n
-
)
>
si M
ilh ,
n
fnVir
-
n
.64 1
.48 5n
.32 uit
. 16 He
3 Ly
rain ^8h
@
.80 S
.64 ^
.48 in
3 F4^74 ^
rain Vngo
@
09/98HR2 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0
k,-, . J L
Lincoln County
HR09/98 DY
i . : ; L... 4 i . ,
M
agrainapre
Qf\. BO
1 KA5 -64
m .Qi .48ni i OO
iK "32no 4 c?! -16
0
?^R4j^aojos
fralno
n
a. 80
5 -64
T y«Qi . 48nu . 32it
?! -16r\
3264 MUDDY RIVER AT WARM SPRINGS
11^4 CA^IFORflJA WASH 2 (2 .8V1
n
1164 CAI.TFORNTA WASH 1 n.77"l
i i i • •
1144 PAT.TFORNTA WASH 7 (3^19" )
n
RD
h
(2
Hfl
r
n-,
1.
T
- -
i1
i
9"
r
)
ni i i. ,.m, . J «~i . i
-Thnrm n . Fl
TI. n .rfi n.
n
nTl n 1 n
.80
.64 £
.48 in
32 Uit
31R4Ca
rainornia
80
64 g
48 Tn
32 uit
16 ne
.4.4 '
rainQrnia
09/98HR2DYll->
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
M
°JnMesa
M
w
Va
244
ain
an. OU
1 KA5 -64
m ,oi -48
n
n o >• cMB . lo/8
^R4
ain
. 80
1 R/15 -64
T /1Qi . 48nii ^3 OU . 32itr)B . 16/S
r\(
3244 MORMON ME^H 2 (1 .22" i
i i i . 1 . 1
Tnfi4 WRTSER WASH H .10")
.
3384 MEADOW VALLEY WASH ( 2 . 2 4 " )
"*:?fi4 Mimnv RTVRR AT WARM ^PRTN^R
n
n
i
r
r-
nO
RD ( ).
.. r
, \
n
i
lln
"
r
[. oq"
Tin
-
\
n
n
-,
• *
n IT, IT!
nJl
r- ^
1 . -
-TV. . n
n .
.80
r* * 1.64 ^,Q m. 48 i
n. 32 u
it.16 n.e
WBQBA i
pain 1aP
Was
on h.80
C A 1.64 g
..Q rp. 48 in
*^O • •. 32 U
. 16 MB
M
rain ga
Preci
09/98HH2 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0
I,Clark
Seatembe r 11
i, -i l. • -i « • i • •
County Regional Flood Control District1998 (Green V a l l e v l
UeuicelO 4704Dree i D
U n i t s in
4744p rec i D
1n
4734prec i p
in
4739 4644precip precip
in In
4624Dree 1 p
In
4634orec i P
in
4774prec H p
1n
09/11/98143014151400134513301315130012451230121512001 145
TOTALS:
47044744473447394644462446344774
0.000 .000 .000 . 000.000 . 000 . 000 .040. 120.040.040 . 04
0 . 28
MOOT venial1 1/2 miles
0.000.000 .000 . 000 .000 .000.040.310. 550 . 080. 280 . 00
1 . 26
e i n speSouth
V/iqwam Avenue 1/2UPRR ChanneNWS OfficesPa radi se RdEastern AveTIMET f aci 1
ctiofmi 1
1 at Greenon Indus t1/4 ml1/4 mi
i t v in
lele
0.000.000.040.080. 120.080 . 550. 200 . 040.670.080.00
1 .85
on s tat i
0 .000. 000.000.040.040. 120 . 390.040 . 160.510.000.00
1 . 30
0.000.000.000.000.040. 160.000 .040.000.040.240 .04
0. 55
on near T o vi n of
000000000000
0
Si oan
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.20
. 16
. 04
. 24
. 16
.04
.83
000000000000
1
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.04
. 24
. 12
.00
. 67
. 20
.00
. 26
0 . 000.000.000 . 000.040.080.510. 160 . 040 . 000.000 . 00
0 . 83
S k v Harbor Ait" porte East oVal lev
rial RdNorth ofSouth of
f EasternP a r k w a vNorth of BW1 ndmi 1 1V/ a r m S D r 1
Avenue
1 u e 0 iLanenqs Rd
amond Rd
He nde rson
Clark Countv Regional Flood Control D i s t r i c tSeptember 11. 1998 (E. LV V a l l e v )
De v i celD 4379DataType precipU n i t s in
4374 4394 4084 4174 4284 4074orecip precip precip precip orecip precip
in in in in in in
4114p rec i p
i n
4154prec i p
i n
09/11/98143014151400134513301315130012451230121512001 145
TOTALS :
437943744394408441744284407 441144 1 54
Van
0 . 000.000. 240.080.120.040. 160.080. 120. 550.000.00
1 . 38
Bu sk inear i nteNe 1onon
1 i s BlDe se r tSi oan
near 1 nteatLasCon
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.35 0.04 0 . 00 0 . 000.04 0.12 0 .08 0.040 . 00 0 . 08 0.04 0.080.04 0. 16 0. 20 0.200 . 08 0.04 0.04 0 .000.04 0 .08 0. 08 0.240.08 0.39 0.43 0. 390.16 0.04 0.04 0 .000 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 000.00 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00
0.79 0.94 0.91 0.94
rk Detention Basin near Ha rmon /MacLeodrsection of Eastern Avenue and twainvd 1/4 m i l e South of Sahara Avenue
000000000000
1
.00
.00
. 47
. 39
. 16
.08
.00
.04
. 16
.08
.00
.00
. 38
000000000000
1
.00
. 39
. 51
. 16
. 08
.04
.00
.04
.08
.04
.00
. 00
. 34
000000000000
1
.06
. 51
. 59
. 35
. 20
.04
. 04
.04
. 12
.00
.00
. 00
.89
000000000000
0
. 00
.00
.20
.04
.08
. 12
.04
. 28
.08
.00
.00
.00
.83
Rose Golf Course 1/4 m i l e South of Sahara AvenueChannel at Charleston B l v drsection of Washinciton Avenue and Lamb Bl vd
inter section of Lake Mead B l v d and Pecos RdVeqas B l v d North 1/4 East of Lamb B l v d
fluence Detetnion Basin
Clark County Re g i o n a l Flood Control DistrictSeptember 11. 1998 (California Wash)
De v i c e l D 3144DataTvpe precipUni t s
09/112300224522302215220021452130211521002045203020152000194519301915190018451830181518001745173017 151700164516301615160015451 530151515001445143014151 400134513301315130012451 23(31215120011451 130
TOTAL
314431643184326433843O64323432443294
i n
/980 . 000 . 040 . 000 . 000. 200.000.000.000. 120 . 000.000.000.000.080. 390. 120 . 000 . 000. 160 .000 . 000 . 000.000.000.000.000 . 000 . 000.000 . 000 . 000. 160 . 350.040 .000.000. 350. 390. 550.000 .000.000 . 000. 240 . 000.000 . 00
S: 3.19
Cal i forniaC a l i f o r n i aC a l i f o r n i aMuddy R i v eMeadow Val7 m i l e s N
3164 3184 3264 3384precip precip precip precip
in
0.000.000.000 . 000 . 040 . 000 . 000 . 000 .000 . 000.000 . 000 .00
0.080.000 . 000.000 .080.040 .000.000.000.000.080.000.000.000 . 000 .000.0S0.080. 160 . 000.000.000. 200.470 . 280. 200.000.000 . 000 . 000.000 . 000.000.00
1.77
Wash. 13 mWash. 7 miWash. 4 mi
in
0.00 '0.120 . 000.00 .0 .000.000.000.04O . 000.000 . 000.000.080.040.080.000 . 080.080.080.120.040. 160 . 000.000.000.000.000.000.000.160. 12O . 3 10.000.000.240.470.240. 350 . 000.000.000 . 000 .000 . 040 .00a .000.00
2 . 32
i les SSWles SSI/ oles SW of
r at Warm So r inns Rdlev Wash, 1of Glendale
15 m i l e s NW of Gl ends3 m i l e s N EOv/e rton A i
of Bowmanroc r t
1n
0.000 . 000 .000 .000.000 . 000.000.000.000.000.000 . 040. 120 . 000 .000.000.000.000 .040.040 .000.000.040.280.000.000.000.000 .000.000.000 .000 . 040.000.0B0.080.790.200.000.000 . 000.040. 310. 000 . 000.000 . 00
2.09
of Gl endaf GlendalGl enda 1 e; 6 m i l e s
in
0.000.000.000.000 .000 .000 .000.000.000.000.000. 000.080.000.000 .040 .000.000.000.000 . 000.000.040 .000.000.000.000.000. 160. 000. 390 . 200.000.000. 160 . 590. 390.000.080.000.040.000.080.000.000.000.00
2.24
lee
NW of
3064orec i p
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
1
1n
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.08
.08
.00
.00
.04
.08
.00
.00
.04
.00
.00
.28
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
. 12
.00
.00
.04
.00
.00
. 20
. 24
. 08
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.04
.00
.00
.00
.00
. 30
3234precip
in
0.000 . 000.000.000.000 . 000.000.000.000 . 000 .000.000 . 000.000 .000.000.000 .000 . 000.000.000.000 . 000.000.080.080.000. 160. 160.000 . 000 . 000.000 . 000.000.000 . 040.000 . 000 . 000.000.040.000 . 000 . 040.080 . 00
0.67
3244prec i p
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
1
in
. 08
. 04
. 39
. 16
.00
. 00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
. 55
. 00
.00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
.00
. 22
3294prec i p
i n
0.160 .080.000 . 000.000 . 000.000.000 . 000.000 . 000.000 . 000 . 000 . 000.000.000 .000.000.000.000.000 . 000.000 . 000.000 . 040 .000.000 . 000 . 000.040.000.000.000 .000 . 000 . 000.000.000 . 000 .000 . 000 . 040.000.300.00
0.35
Gl enda 1 e1 m i l e s NNW of Glendale
1-5Re s e v/o i r
Figure la (above) and Ib (below). Las Vegas Wash looking north and south from Vegas ValleyDrive. The channel is approximately 100-feet wide and 8-feet deep; discharge is approximately 9000
cfs. (September 11, 1998)
I"V . > • • • •
flit i m^im/^^^
Figure 2a (above) and 2b (below). Muddy River Bridge at SR-168 in Glendale. High Hows in theMuddy River were 2-3 feet deep across the roadway on September 11, 1998.
Figure 3. Wash out of paved road east of I-15 at rhe Ute exit resulting from flows in the CaliforniaWash September 11, 1998.
Figure 4. Debris washed up 18-inches on fence at rest area on 1-15 south of Moapa/Glendale exit fromflow in California Wash drainage across the Interstate on September 11, .998.
Figure 5. Muddy River below Gubler Avenue crossing. Note shed perched on bank in left center ofphoto after flows of September 11, 1998.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE785! Industrial RoadLas Vegas. Nevada 89128
October 21, 1998
Harding Lawson Associates5145 South Arville, Suite ALas Vegas, NV 89118
TO: Joe RumannSUBJECT: Radar Images and Event Summary for Heavy Rainfall at Sunrise Mountain on Septmeber 11, 199S
Dear Joe,
Please find enclosed a series of radar images for the September 11, I99S rain event as per your request Explanation follows
Summary: Based on analysis of KESX WSR-88 Doppler Radar data, rain began in the vicinity of Sunnse Mountain between 11 :45a.m. and noon, but was very light until about 12:20 p.m. PDT Periods of heavy rain occurred from nvo successive thunderstormsbetween 12:20-1:40 p.m., with additional light-to-moderate rain until about 2:15 p m.
During the heaviest rainfall, radar estimated rain rates of 2.5-3.0 inches per hour Rainfall totals for the entire storm were maximizedin the Sunnse Mountain area at 4.4" total accumulation While this may be slightly overestimated due to hail contamination, a stormtotal of 3-4" is reasonable, most of which fell in a time period of less than an hour and a half
Imagery: The radar images I've provided are of two types: reflectivity and rainfall estimates The first type is a measure of reflectedradar energy back to the antenna in decibels of reflectivity (dBZ). Echoes shaded in reds and purples represent the strongest returns(>50 dBZ) and typically depict moderate to heavy rainfall. The second image type is rainfall estimate, an algorithm based onconverting reflectivity to hourly ram rate and storm total precipitation. The equation used during this event was Z=300R'', whereZ is reflectivity in dBZ, and R is rain rate.
The date/time group for each image is listed in the upper right, four rows down from the top. The date/time stamp in the top rowis the date which the image was printed, so ignore that. The second line is labeled "CMP REF", which means "CompositeReflectivity". This simply means that each pixel represents the highest three-dimensional reflectivity for that location at that timeThe third line down is labeled "124 NM" and ".54 NM RES", defining the range and individual pixel resolution for that scan Thefourth line, "09/11/98 19:21" represents the dale and time in UTC During the summer, our local time is UTC - 7 hours, so a timestamp of 19:21 represents 12:21 PDT.
The five reflectivity images indicate the time, duration, and intensity of rainfall over the Sunnse Mountain area on 11 SEP 9S The19:21 (12:21 PDT) image depicts an area of heavy rain approaching the western slopes of Sunnse Mountain from the direction ofBoulder Highway. At 12:34, heavy rain was clearly overspreading the mountain The heavy rain associated w' l th the firstthunderstorm crested the mountain and appeared to be moving downwind at 12:57 p m This is not to suggest rain had stopped atthis time, but had briefly diminished in intensity By 1 :15 p.m., rainfall intensified again with the onset of the next thunderstormThis persisted for at least 15-20 minutes, then began to taper off into light to moderate showers for another ha l f -hour or so The lastreflectivity image indicates the trailing edge of showers cleanng the area of interest at 2 :13 p m.
The image labeled "1-HR PRECIP"depicts the radar-estimated hour ly precipitation rate for the \o lumc scan ending at 20.03 L'TC(13 03 PDT) It shows a large area exceeding two inches-hour extednmg from the McCollough Range across a narrow swath of theeastern side of the valley to the Sunrise/Frenchman Mountain region Maximum rainfall was estimated on the western slopes ofSunnse/Frenchman peaks at 26 inches/hour
The final image, labeled "STM PRECIP" represents an accumulated precipitation estimate for the entire storm event Once again,the maximum (4.4 inches) occurred near Sunrise Mountain.
If you have any further questions, feel free to call or e-mail me
Regards,
Kim Runk, Science & Operations Officer Phone 2(>3-9744 c\t .22-1National Weather Service - Las Vegas E-mai l Kim R u n k - a noaa cov
STM IDX7R8X9Q0
AZ/RAH347/ 25320/ 1835/ 7034-' 56
TUSHOMOHOHO
MESOYESYESHOHO
PQSH/POH/MX SIZE90/100/ 3.00
50/100/ 1.500/ 60/ 0.500/ 0/ 0.00
UIL5656185
DB2M HT69 11.862 27 652 7.146 5.1
TOP27.3>27.621 .916.2
FCST MUMT219/ 16194/ 21167/ 10198/ 27
lo/ l9/98 1 8 ^ 2 9CMP REF 37 CR124 HM .54 HM RES09/11/98 1 9 ^ 2 1K:LIH ^ KES;: 31:. 42 031)494S FT i 1 - 4 . 53 2TI-J
MODE H jl 1CHTk 3491 iEL .loHI-l
7y UBZ
HD DBZ510
15202530354045505560657075
MAG=4X FL= 1 COM=1UMl : 'iT l-l n I
1 UUL U.-'H • TU
Q15 SRH 1749LU-:LI Rfi. LLHF. iU 1 •i.i.'OUUri. 1 L-.l.i19/1819 ARCHIUEUHIT 1 READ DONEHHRDCOPY
MAP SELECTED
STM IDX7R8DoH9
HZ/RAH352/ 27333/ 197/ 864S/ 29
TUSNOHONONO
MESOYESNOHONO
POSH/POH/MX SIZE100/100/>4.0890/100/ 3.25aaxiaex 1.00Q/ 36/ 0.50
UIL59584032
DBZM HT70 17.571 12.458 9.559 2.0
TOP28.829.028.019.7
FCST MUMT222/ 15200/ 21201/ 12178/ 25
10/19/98 18=31CMP REF 37 CR124 NM .54 NM RES09/11/98 19=34
y^y FT i n/5"-: '271
27NI-I
1 C O M = 1M I
Q15 SRM 1743DUD . RFC L1HE 1D 1 'iCOHMl-1 I't [i19/1819 ARCHIUEUNIT 1 READ DONEHrtRDCOPV
SELECTED
STM IDR8RSX 7•:;*
AZ/RAH352.-' 25\2/ 41
359/ 33333/160
TUSHOHOHOHO
ME SOYESYESHOHO
POSH/PQH/MX SIZE70/100/ 2.2510/100/ 0.7570/ 90-' 2.2540/100/ 1 .25
UIL55214758
DBZM HT67 1.754 19.668 6.057 22.8
TOP26.427.221.932.7
FCST MUMT213/ 231 4 1 / 15217/ 14262 / IS
/ . //, f. • 4 / i-*\ i:.ELLS I lj|| rhSqjJ HOT
* -j /" .8&kj _:
10/19/98 18=34CMP REF J? CR124 HM .54 HM RES09/11/93 19=57
494:3 >f"l l-l'-fiV ifil
CHTR 34yDEi,HnX= 70 OB."
OBZ
MAG=4X FL= 1 COM=1O'JL : ST II H T
OUL U/A'TU
,•015 SRM 1749 R' LII-.LI KKU i i HE i^•DlSCOHHlj: I uO19/1819 ARCHIUEUHIT 1 READ DONEHARDCOPY
STM IDLI 3A3RSH9
AZ/RAN5/ 50
345/ 24357/ 2720.--' 48
T'JSNONgNO
UNO
MESOYESYESNOHO
POSH/POH/MX SIZE60/1 00/ 1 . 75Id/180/ 0.7550/1 00/ 1 . 5020/ 90/ 1 . 00
UIL•45324437
DEZM HT62 19.958 1.663 1 .961 4.1
TOP33.524 .823.723.4
FCST MUMT223/ 23132/ 28214/ 20169/ 36
10/19/98 IS-37CMP REF 37 CR124 HM .54 MM RES09/11/98 28-15
-.:b'E::-: ?•":> -42 u3HHI l l - t . f,3. 27W
J / 42 CELLS.-pfc W I N D O W NOT DI
Q15 SRM 174?till 1.1 Rl-'C LJU J -.1 i iHIU-1 I ' l - i i19/1819 ARCHIUEUNIT 1 READ DONEHARDCOPY
ELECTED
STM IDB5F6ZlK7
AZ/RAN6 / 33
21/ 6614/ 6344--' 39
TUSNONONONO
MESOYESNONONO
POSH/POH/MX SIZE28/ 90/ 0.7530/1 09/ 1 .090/ 20''<0.580/ 50/ 0 . 56
U1L37391816
DBZM HT62 6.063 6.456 6.057 11.0
TOP22.227.312.915.1
FCST MUMT199-' 19194x 17202x 25
NEW
10 /'I 9- "'9 8 18 ;46CMP REF 37 CR124 Ntt .54 NM RES09/11/98 2 1 = 1 3KLiH -KE •:;:••: I-:". 4. u3u4^48 FT in 5"-. 27N
DBZ
CELLS IN lflH^>W NOT DjfSPLeYEfi ^ g H ?JFX
MAG=4X FL= 1 COM=1•-• I 11 i, I
H. I-1 • l -VDi i > J
Q15 SRM 1749
19/1819 ARCHIUEUNIT 1 READ DONEHAROCOPV
MAP SELECTED
10-' 19/93 18 '451-HR PRECIP 78 OHP124 NM 1.1 MM RES
09/11/98 20:03kLiH I. E •:::••: -I1:-
FT i i 4. s;:
l-l 0 1. Hi H , _ Ji. MIK 34j|. it£i_ . , 'MI' iI ' lHX- i r. 1|!
U H 1 .1 - Li 9 • ' 1 1 9 :. : 2 1 • O UND
>6.me INe. lee . 200 . 30
0 . 4 0
0.50
0.60
0 .700 . 800 .90
1 . W0
1 .502 . 002. 503 . tie
X FL= 1 C0ri=l
C,'15 SRM 1749DLL" l<:pi- I.JHL" .'U J '-:i uHHI- i I M.I19/1 SI 9 ARCHIUEUNIT 1 READ DONEHARDCOPY
10/19/98 18:47STM PRECIP 80 STP124 NM 1 . 1 MM RES
09/11/98 21:31-..E'iX '•:-• 41: UiH
iHo H T 114 5 ::Mn-:- 4 4 J UHi.ilJb H .- '1C n n«- "-:-4::'Ht"i.-tt-'C-ny. ' 1U ;•:.: 1'hULi-by. 1 1 •'n-:'- L-'
IN
MAG=4X FL= 1 COM=1
NT C
19/1819 rtRCHIUEUNIT 1 READ DONEHARDCOPY
r
3
i
js
j
5
I
*
• •
Liw
1.1rr
«*
SitfjB
T.13S.
T.14S.
T.15S,
T.16S.
T.17S.
T.1BS.
T.19S.
T.20S
T.21S
T.22S
TR
Clai
8
19
55
56
93
94
131
132
169
1 70
23S54 E
k C
17
20
54
57
92
95
130
133
168
171
\197
isX
T.24&R.5SE.
15
W
tr
R.57E.
15
22
5 52 51
5 59"
91
56
129
<:4
157
wo.172
196
\22ffS
T.25S.R.5«E.
an Soring60
90
97
128
135
166
main Son173
195
201
0 Sandy\219
14
23
50
61
89
98
127
136
165
^174
194
Good202 •
'alley218
WlX\222
T.25S. XR.57E. \
13
24
49
62
S3
99
125
Une we137
164Sonn; 'i
193
-a217*
223
R.58E. >v
12
25
48
63
87
100
125
uriain«138
U>v
11
26
47
64
86
101
124
S:"™J»™?3E',B Rlt: R e l iF " SUF RB 'F RF«F R 19F " 7nF p 71 p
1C
27
46
65
85
102
123
>-
9
28
45
86
84
103
122
Honn us ''^ffft
Win n«ter
163 162 ••H'lrV Paradise
s:.192
204
216
224
236
31*\240T.28S. XR.59E. X
177
s»205
215
225
235
241
T29.N"".60E. X
•vcir^~T
17s"'r
190
2C6
214
225
234
242
251
:erson• 179
189
T.J1V.S.
207
213
227
233
243Sea
250
254
1.311 V61
R.62E. \
8
29
44
67
83A
10 X
r\
HN&" 158
1 181
S BouloCily
206
212
elson A228
232
244inligM
249
255Cal-Nev
J 260
7.12 ,i
7
30
//
j'>^
120
143
1 5 7 ,
V32
16
209 .
J
229\
231
245
248
, .256
259
T32S ^V62
R.63E. >v 63
\266
R.64E. X
T.34S.R.65E
Jounty Assessor, 3B3,45WW
6
31 Glenc
ff
f\31 S
106 2
119 =
44 S
156
T.23S.
>210
T.25S.
T.26S.
\ 3o
( 246
247l
257 \
258
15 4 3 2 Messuiie T.13S.
B.nkpr,-t.j •'
a e 3 2 33 34 35 36 T.14S.
4U'nd,ie° 39 38 37 T.15S.
Ovenon 71 72 73 74 T.16S.
79 78 77 76 75 I17S-
108 109 110 111 112 T.18S.
117 116 115 114 113 T.-.9S.
146 147 148 149 150 T.20S.
^r^^\^ 1« /51I21S-
R.67E. R.6BE. CL l!iyT22S.J '***~^ R.71E.
R.69E. R.70E.
1.24S.
•jc^vn ^
0<2-P 1^/^5
T.27S. S ~*
T-29S- SK^-^T. {.( . fCi^y*
T.30S.
T.31S.
264 1DughnnlT. 32S.
iJI
26s)
S'J
267
T.33S.
T.34S.
R.66E.
©Copyright by CompaSS Maps* Inc.
1 0 . - \ 6 - 9 S 1 0 : 0 3 Q602 252 4 1 6 2 III A PIinr.NU --"_ l-\S_\IJJAh 4100'-'
.
.'Methods for Estimatirfg .Magnitue .-.-and Rrequency-QfFloc^3:i^
: Southwestern United States" " ' ' "
8y BLAKEMORE^E. THOMAS>-H:W.and S.D. WALTEME^R, -'- :? - : •— -
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEYOpen-File Report 93—419"
Prepared in cooperation -with the -;:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS,ARJZON/fcDEPARTMEKNSPDRTAlD;:; . ^CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT CMJTRANSPORTAr (ON H.> .;-.-•
- ' ' ;' '''
NEW
Tijcson, Arizona .1994 ••, :
1 0 / 1 6 / 9 8 10:35 0602 252 -1162 HLA PHOENIJ -»-»-• US VEGAS (21002.'00 2
54
500,000
130-YEAFRELATION FOP LOW- TO
MtDCi.E-ELEV*nON STUCY AREA
)0 ICO 1.000
DRAINAGE AREA, IN SQUARE M'LES
10,000
Figure 37. Relalione between 100-year peak discharge and drainage area and plot of maximumpeak discharge of record and drainage area tor gaged sites in trie Southern Great Basin Region 10.
Table 14. Hybrid equations tor eEtrmaling regional flood-frequency isiatbnj tor the Southern Great Basin Region 10Equinox Q, petk duihiijt, u atuc led fu wtond; ud AAfiA. drainife uu. ui impure nnkx Dtu were h»ie4 oo 104 iwunj. Avenje!wnb*r of ytw o( lymrnne neord ii 31.
ivcn(c ««idird cm* of rrjTUcao for \he hjvbhd method incliuln mudt cf ttio widuB-itKiai midul vihact ind therefon ii not—•I"—-— --- -- ' r , , - - . - . - .
RBCUTTBIM(ntarnJ, h yotra
2
5
10
2S
30
100
EethnMod•vtrao*
EqutUon uandirderrarefragm«)on,ln
log unftt
2=12AREAa51 1.14
O^dSAREA"' .602
C-200AREAa6J .675
G=400AREA"i .949
(?=5«IAREA"' 528
C-850AREAais 133
EqutvtientyMrtalrooui d
0-618
3,13
3.45
2.49
3.22
Z22
- i.n\
northWorksheet for Irregular Channel
Project DescriptionProject File p:\fmw\sunnse.fm2Worksheet northFlow Element Irregular ChannelMethod Manning's FormulaSolve For Discharge
Input DataChannel SlopeWater Surface ElevationElevation range: 96.00 ft to
0100,
100.00ft.Station (ft) Elevation (ft)
0.0012.0014.0032.0042.0051.0066.00
100.98.99.9897,96
100
00000000,00.00.00
.020000 ft/ft
.00 ft
Start Station0 .00
ResultsWtd. Mannings CoefficientDischargeFlow AreaWetted PerimeterTop WidthDepthCritical Water Elev.Critical SlopeVelocityVelocity HeadSpecific EnergyFroude NumberFull Flow CapacityFlow is supercritical.
0.0351190.26
128.5067.0666.00
400100.22
ft'/sft2
ftftftft
0.014221 ft/ft9.261.33
101.331.17
1190.26
fu'sftft
ft'/s
End Station Roughness66.00 0.035
Ocl 15 1998 Your Corrpany Flow.Masler vd 1135214 Haeslad Methods. Inc 37 Brocksice Road Waterbury CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1
24+47Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel
Project DescriptionProject File p:\fmw\sunrise.fm2Worksheet dropFlow Element Trapezoidal ChannelMethod Manning's FormulaSolve For_ Discharge
Input DataMannings CoefficientChannel SlopeDepthLeft Side SlopeRight Side SlopeBottom Width
0.0340.029000 ft/ft5.00 ft3.30 H : V2.50 H:V
11.00 ft
ResultsDischargeFlow AreaWetted PerimeterTop WidthCritical DepthCritical SlopeVelocityVelocity HeadSpecific EnergyFroude NumberFlow is supercritical.
1998.86127.5041.7040.00
6.210.011417
15.683.828.821.55
ft3/sft2
ftftftft/ftft/sftft
Oc: 15. 1993 Your Company FiowMas'.er v4 i135240 Haestad Methods. Inc 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1
47+85Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel
Project DescriptionProject FileWorksheetFlow ElementMethodSolve For
p:\fmw\sunrise.fm2ditchTrapezoidal ChannelManning's FormulaDischarge
Input DataMannings CoefficientChannel SlopeDepthLeft Side SlopeRight Side SlopeBottom Width
0.0400.027000 ft/ft5.50 ft1.30 H:V1.30 H:V
16.00 ft
ResultsDischargeFlow AreaWetted PerimeterTop WidthCritical DepthCritical SlopeVelocityVelocity HeadSpecific EnergyFroude NumberFlow is supercritical.
1872.70127.33
34.0430.30
6.290.016423
14.713.368.861.26
ft3/sft'ftftftft/ftft/sftft
Ocl 16 1998
135302
Your CompanyHaeslad Methods. Inc 37 Brookside Road Walerbury CT 06708 (203)755-1666
FlowMasIer v4 iPage 1 of 1
UpnRchanne
4739rain
.8015m
nu .32ite .163?
man@W
: 47.3 4 .
rain
.8015 'mi . 48nu .32it
. 16
0
47iq UPRR^ fHANNF.T, ( 1 . T 4 " }
ryI f
_ 1-- •- | .
i
4fi14 ntlPK rRF.F.K AT FARTF.RN (l.?fi[H
_ ___ r
. . . . [4734 PITTMAN WASH AT WIGWAM (1.8S!,
r -4 7 4 4 SOUTH HENDERSON (1 .30 " )
n
-
-
41^ _ n
i
n
I ' l l i i i • ,
n
r . ._ __
n n
.80
.64 1
. 48 in
. 32 uit
. 16 ne
/a
DAR^A ^
C
rainC
E• Ut/
.64 ^
. 48 in
. 32 uit
. 16 ne
/a
S4744 — urain £n
Ul
ende
HR2 409/98 DYll->
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22