supernofa broadcast continuum of care april 2005

SuperNOFA Broadcast

Continuum of CareApril 2005

SuperNOFA Broadcast

Continuum of CareApril 2005

Housing for People who are Homeless and

Addicted to Alcohol


Addicted to Alcohol

- Deadline: May 19- Funding: $10 million, housing

activities only- Match: Cash - dollar for

dollar- Electronic submission

- Deadline: May 19- Funding: $10 million, housing

activities only- Match: Cash - dollar for

dollar- Electronic submission


Addicted to Alcohol– Target: Chronically homeless

who are addicted to alcohol

– Applicants: Must be part of CoC and in jurisdictions with at least 100 chronically homeless


Addicted to Alcohol

– Activities: leasing and limited housing search/ administration

2005 COC Competition

• Deadline: June 10• Funding: $1 billion• No electronic filing

2004 CoC Results

• Awarded: 4,406 projects for $1.24b

• Renewal Funding: 70%• Housing/Svcs: 58% vs 42%• Perm Hsg projects: 35%

Overview

Need (40 of 100 pts)Continuum (60 of 100)

Supportive HousingShelter Plus Care & SROMiscellaneous

Pro Rata Need

1. Initial PRN Amount2. Renewal Hold Harmless Amount3. Permanent Housing Bonus (Samaritan)

Step 1: Initial Pro Rata Need

- Less than last year - Reasons:

Lower appropriation More SPC renewalsUpdated formula data

Step 2: Hold Harmless

HUD holds CoC’s harmless if renewal demand exceeds initial PRN

HUD provides CoC higher of: - Initial PRN or

- 1-Yr SHP potential renewal

Step 2: Hold Harmless (Example))

- If Initial PRN = $1m

But 1-yr SHP annual renewal amt is $1.2m,

Then CoC hold harmless at $1.2m


Two options for determining

1. Traditional method

2. Hold Harmless Reallocation


1. Traditional method based on average annual renewal amount of SHP renewals submitted by CoC


2. Hold Harmless Reallocation Method if CoC wants to use HH to create new permanent housing projects

Step 2: Hold HarmlessReallocation

How: HH CoC’s may reduce/

eliminate renewals and use the savings to create new PH projects:

SHP-PH, SPC, SRO

Step 2: Hold Harmless Reallocation

Example:

SHPR1: $500,000 reduce by $100,00

SHPR2: $500,000 reduce by $100,000

Total reduction: $200,000 for a new project(s)

Example:

SHPR1: $500,000 reduce by $100,00

SHPR2: $500,000 reduce by $100,000

Total reduction: $200,000 for a new project(s)

Step 2: Hold Harmless Reallocation

Risks of using for a new project:

1. Could fail project quality 2. Might not score above initial funding line Result: Reallocated money permanently lost

Step 2: Hold HarmlessReallocation

If your CoC wants to pursue the new project option —

Contact your FO to reconcile your CoC’s Hold Harmless Reallocation amount before May 12

Step 1: Initial Pro Rata Need


Now:Step 3: Permanent Housing

Bonus

Pro Rata Need

Step 3: PH Bonus: Samaritan Housing Initiative

Bonus Same: 1. Must be a new PH project

(SHP, SPC, SRO)2. Must be #1 priority

project

Step 3: Samaritan Bonus

Differences:1. 100% of clients must be chronic

2. If SHP, can use up to 20% of project request for case mgt

3. Related to need: 15% of Initial PRN

Step 3: Samaritan Bonus

1,000,000 x .15 = $150,000

Final Pro RataNeed

Ex:Initial PRN $1,000,000

Hold Harmless $1,200,000√ Samaritan Bonus 150,000√

Final PRN $1,350,000

General Changes

• Client eligibility for PH—new and renewals

– Street, shelter, TH– Applies to new clients

General Changes

• FMR Updates to SPC and SRO

• Past: FMR’s updated prior to

selection, bumping projects - HUD allowed straddle

General Changes

• Now: Projects selected with old FMRs. Then updated with new FMR. No projects will be bumped.

– No straddle—projects to fall fully within 40 need points

Continuum of Care

Continuum of Care

CoC Exhibit 1CoC Exhibit 1

• Scoring • Application Summary • Planning Process• Strategy • Discharge Planning Policy

• Scoring • Application Summary • Planning Process• Strategy • Discharge Planning Policy

CoC Exhibit 1CoC Exhibit 1

•Unexecuted Grants•CoC Components•Pops./Subpops. •Data Methods•HMIS

•Unexecuted Grants•CoC Components•Pops./Subpops. •Data Methods•HMIS

CoC Scoring Points (60) 2004

2005

• Process & Strategy 17 17 • Gaps & Priority 10 10• HMIS 5 5• Housing Emphasis 10 12 • Supplemental Res. 13 8• Performance 5 8

Application Summary(CoC – A)

Application Summary(CoC – A)

• Geographic codes

• Check your geography carefully

– Based on CDBG defined universe that changes from year to year

• Geographic codes

• Check your geography carefully

– Based on CDBG defined universe that changes from year to year

Planning Process(CoC – B)


• Eliminated: brief summary of CoC accomplishments

• New: Describe which and how local and/or state elected officials participate

• Eliminated: brief summary of CoC accomplishments

• New: Describe which and how local and/or state elected officials participate



• “Level of Participation” specific percent for each planning organization

Less than 40% Low 40 – 80% Medium Greater than 80% High

• “Level of Participation” specific percent for each planning organization

Less than 40% Low 40 – 80% Medium Greater than 80% High



• Typos: In 1 (e)

– 50% should be 80%– 2d should be 1 (e)

• Typos: In 1 (e)

– 50% should be 80%– 2d should be 1 (e)

Strategy(CoC – C)

Strategy(CoC – C)

Chronic homeless strategy

New-CH performance tracking chart

•Individuals chart •Beds chart

Chronic homeless strategy

New-CH performance tracking chart

•Individuals chart •Beds chart

Strategy(CoC – C)

Strategy(CoC – C)

Past performance narrative (2 pages)

•Specific actions•Obstacles•Changes in the number of CH 2004 - 2005

Past performance narrative (2 pages)

•Specific actions•Obstacles•Changes in the number of CH 2004 - 2005

Discharge Planning Policy(CoC – D)

Discharge Planning Policy(CoC – D)

• Streamlined: through eliminating the narrative

• New chart: development/ implementation of protocols for:

- Foster care- Health care- Mental health- Correctional

• Streamlined: through eliminating the narrative

• New chart: development/ implementation of protocols for:

- Foster care- Health care- Mental health- Correctional

Unexecuted Grants(CoC – E)

Unexecuted Grants(CoC – E)

• No change• No change

Service Activity Chart (CoC – F)

Service Activity Chart (CoC – F)

• Streamlined through eliminating:

Description of planned services

How participants received & accessed services

• Streamlined through eliminating:

Description of planned services

How participants received & accessed services

Housing Activity Chart (CoC – G)


• Emergency • Transitional• Perm. Supp. Housing for Homeless

• Emergency • Transitional• Perm. Supp. Housing for Homeless



• Current

• Under development:– Fully funded/not yet occupied– New – anticipated date of

occupancy

• Current

• Under development:– Fully funded/not yet occupied– New – anticipated date of

occupancy

Changes in Housing Activity Chart


HMIS Participation Codes A = All clients entered S = Some clients entered N = No clients entered

Z = Not participating

HMIS Participation Codes A = All clients entered S = Some clients entered N = No clients entered

Z = Not participating



• HMIS Coverage Calculated for year round beds

• Unmet need added to each Housing Activity Type

• HMIS Coverage Calculated for year round beds

• Unmet need added to each Housing Activity Type


Permanent Supportive Housing

New: Is the PSH unit targeted or

occupied by chronic homeless individuals

Units/CHPSH Project 100/50

Energy Star Chart (CoC – H)

• Awareness• Notified CoC• Percent use

– Priority chart projects

Housing Gaps Analysis Chart - Eliminated

• Now reported in Housing

Activity Charts as “Unmet Need”

Homeless Population and Subpopulation

Chart (CoC – I)

• Must be based upon 2005 counts consistent with HUD Standards

• Shelter Count January 2005 • Street Count preferably January 2005

Data Collection Methods

• Annual Housing Activity Chart• Emergency/TH definition• Unmet housing needs• Homeless Pops & Subpops Chart - Shelter/Street Count Methods • Plans for 2007 counts & whether 2006 counts planned

2005 Standards & Methods Frequency Methodology

Hsg Activity Chart Ann. 1 night in Jan 05

Hsg Gaps Ann. Local Method

HP/SP Chart

Sheltered Every other 1 night last year(05,07) wk in Jan ‘05

Unsheltered Every other 1 night last year (05,07) wk in Jan ‘05

(Preferred)

HMIS Progress, 2001-2004HMIS Implementation Status 2001-2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2001 2002 2003 2004

% C

ontin

uum

s of

Car

e

Not Considering

Meeting

Selecting

Implementing

HMISHMISHMIS Implementation Status

- Dates – Barriers– Standards Implementation

Unduplicated count procedures

HMIS administrative info

HMIS Implementation Status

- Dates – Barriers– Standards Implementation

Unduplicated count procedures

HMIS administrative info

HMISHMIS

HMIS projects below funding line receive priorityfunding for 1 year if: – 40 need pts and – 65 total points

HMIS projects below funding line receive priorityfunding for 1 year if: – 40 need pts and – 65 total points

2005 CongressionalDirection


• “The Committee remains strongly supportive of the Department’s efforts on data collection and analysis within the homeless programs, especially its efforts to collect a nationally representative sample of homeless data.”

• “The Committee remains strongly supportive of the Department’s efforts on data collection and analysis within the homeless programs, especially its efforts to collect a nationally representative sample of homeless data.”



“HUD should continue its collaborative efforts with local jurisdictions to collect an array of data on homelessness in order to analyze patterns of use of assistance, including howpeople enter and exit the homeless system.”

“HUD should continue its collaborative efforts with local jurisdictions to collect an array of data on homelessness in order to analyze patterns of use of assistance, including howpeople enter and exit the homeless system.”



“The committee directs HUD to continue its role in leading the Federal Government’s efforts on this data collection and analysis activity.”

“The committee directs HUD to continue its role in leading the Federal Government’s efforts on this data collection and analysis activity.”

Report to Congress Report to Congress

Fourth Progress Report on HUD’s Strategy to Improve Homeless Data Collection, Reporting and Analysis

(March 2005)

http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/homeless/hmis/strategy/index.cfm

Fourth Progress Report on HUD’s Strategy to Improve Homeless Data Collection, Reporting and Analysis

(March 2005)


















Project Priorities & Narratives (CoC – K)

Project Priorities & Narratives (CoC – K)

Priority Chart• New – Project Names Column• Tips

– Priority List data must match Project data– Indicate program type within

the component

Priority Chart• New – Project Names Column• Tips

– Priority List data must match Project data– Indicate program type within

the component

Project Priorities Project Priorities

• Narrative Requests

• Sources used to determine performance

• How new project fills gap

• Fair priority process

• Narrative Requests

• Sources used to determine performance

• How new project fills gap

• Fair priority process

Reallocation Chart New New Option (CoC – K)

Reallocation Chart New New Option (CoC – K)

Eligible:• Hold Harmless CoCs Renewal

Burden greater than Initial PRN

What:• Can choose to reduce or eliminate renewal project

• Use funds to create new PH projects – only

Eligible:• Hold Harmless CoCs Renewal

Burden greater than Initial PRN

What:• Can choose to reduce or eliminate renewal project

• Use funds to create new PH projects – only

(CoC – K)(CoC – K)FiscalYear Amount

Number of Grantees

2004 $24.5 million 105

2003 $24 million 90

2002 $25 million 101

2001 $24 million 111

2000 $24.7 million 103

1999 $26.9 million 91

Project Priorites (CoC – K)Reallocation Chart

A B C D E FExpiring Grants Prog.

CodeCompo- nent

Annual Renewal Amount

Reduced Amount

Retained Amount from Existing Grant

Ex, MA01B300002

SHP TH $100,000 $60,000 $40,000

Ex, MA01B400002

SHP SSO $80,000 $80,000 $0

TOTAL $180,000 $140,000 $40,000

Reduced or Eliminated Grant in the 2005 Competition

Project Priorites (CoC – K)Reallocation Chart

G H I J2005 Project Priority Number

Prog. Code Component Transferred Amounts

Ex: #5 SHP PH $90,000

Ex: #12 S&C TRA $50,000

TOTAL $140,000

Newly Created Permanent Housing Projects in the 2005 Competition

Reallocation (CoC – K)Reallocation (CoC – K)

How:•Use Reallocation Chart/ Columns A-J

to track movement of funds

When: • If interested contact FO ASAP no later than May 12, 2005• Grantees and CoC must reconcile annual renewal amounts, eligible grants and total renewal burden with FO by May 20, 2005

How:•Use Reallocation Chart/ Columns A-J

to track movement of funds

When: • If interested contact FO ASAP no later than May 12, 2005• Grantees and CoC must reconcile annual renewal amounts, eligible grants and total renewal burden with FO by May 20, 2005

Reallocation (CoC – K)Reallocation (CoC – K)

RISKS • Loss of renewal funds transferred to new PH projects if CoC scores below funding line or project is rejected

RISKS • Loss of renewal funds transferred to new PH projects if CoC scores below funding line or project is rejected

CoC Project Performance (CoC – M)

CoC Project Performance (CoC – M)

• Assesses CoC’s progress in reducing homelessness

• New – Clarify check boxes most recent APR for all non-HMIS renewals on priority list

• Check boxes for either all or none

• Assesses CoC’s progress in reducing homelessness

• New – Clarify check boxes most recent APR for all non-HMIS renewals on priority list

• Check boxes for either all or none

Performance

1. Permanent housing measures - length of stay

2. Transitional housing measures - moving participants to PH

Performance 3. Mainstream services &

employment measures - increase in obtaining resources

Tip: Enter same total of # of adults being served by renewal projects

on each row of Column#1

Supplemental Resoures – Project Leverging Chart

(CoC – N)

Supplemental Resoures – Project Leverging Chart

(CoC – N)

• New Chart documents all resources

• June 10, 2005• includes cash match, or value of buildings, equip, materials,

services,

• New Chart documents all resources

• June 10, 2005• includes cash match, or value of buildings, equip, materials,

services,

Supplemental Resoures – Project Leverging

Chart (CoC – N)

Supplemental Resoures – Project Leverging

Chart (CoC – N)

• cash sources – Federal, State, City, County, Private, Foundations

• submit at Tech Submission

• cash sources – Federal, State, City, County, Private, Foundations

• submit at Tech Submission

Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing

(CoC – O)

Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing

(CoC – O)

• Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing = 2 pts

• Form – HUD 27300 (located on page 13629 of the general section of the NOFA

• Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing = 2 pts

• Form – HUD 27300 (located on page 13629 of the general section of the NOFA

• Review Sec. Vd2(g) of the general section of the NOFA (page 13588)

• Review March 22 2004 and April 21, 2004 Federal Register Notices

www.archives.gov/federal_register

www.hud.gov/webcasts/index.cfm

• Review Sec. Vd2(g) of the general section of the NOFA (page 13588)

• Review March 22 2004 and April 21, 2004 Federal Register Notices

www.archives.gov/federal_register

www.hud.gov/webcasts/index.cfm

Guidance for Removing Barriers to Affordable

Housing (CoC – O)

Guidance for Removing Barriers to Affordable

Housing (CoC – O)

http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/



http://www.hud.gov/webcasts/index.cfm













New SHP Project Narrative (CoC – 2A) New SHP Project

Narrative (CoC – 2A) New: • #1 Bonus Projects – 100% chronically homeless (check box)

• Change – New project terms 2 or 3 yrs (except HMIS - 1, 2 or 3 yrs)

• Remember only persons coming from streets & shelters and TH are eligible for PH

New: • #1 Bonus Projects – 100% chronically homeless (check box)

• Change – New project terms 2 or 3 yrs (except HMIS - 1, 2 or 3 yrs)

• Remember only persons coming from streets & shelters and TH are eligible for PH


Narrative (CoC – 2A)

Change: What” type and scale of housing on 3a and type and scale of services

Tip: Clarify where clients will come from

Change: What” type and scale of housing on 3a and type and scale of services

Tip: Clarify where clients will come from

New SHP Project Narrative (CoC – 2A)

New SHP Project Narrative (CoC – 2A)

New: Q7a. Indicate date project will participate in HMIS

7b. Verify if 100% on this date

7c. Same question – but (new) for dedicated HMIS only

New: Q7a. Indicate date project will participate in HMIS

7b. Verify if 100% on this date

7c. Same question – but (new) for dedicated HMIS only


Narrative (CoC – 2A)

• Q7. d, e, f - same questions - still for dedicated HMIS only

• No change for Q8 - Discharge Policy

• Q7. d, e, f - same questions - still for dedicated HMIS only

• No change for Q8 - Discharge Policy

Project Information Program Comp/Types

(CoC – 2B)

Project Information Program Comp/Types

(CoC – 2B)

Tips:• Safe Haven – Indicate permanent or

transitional

• Project description information, component box checked, priority list - must all be consistent with each other

Tips:• Safe Haven – Indicate permanent or

transitional

• Project description information, component box checked, priority list - must all be consistent with each other

Existing Facilities and/or Activities (CoC – 2C)

Existing Facilities and/or Activities (CoC – 2C)

• No Change• No Change

Number of Beds, Participants, and

Supportive Services (CoC – 2D)

Number of Beds, Participants, and

Supportive Services (CoC – 2D)

• Reminder: a.1 on Chart 2 beds

for chronic

• Reminder: a.1 on Chart 2 beds

for chronic

HMIS Budget (CoC – 2E)

HMIS Budget (CoC – 2E)

•Reminder:

Dedicated HMIS projects complete entire budget

Shared HMIS projects complete total lines only

•Reminder:

Dedicated HMIS projects complete entire budget

Shared HMIS projects complete total lines only

Operating Costs Chart (CoC – 2F)

Operating Costs Chart (CoC – 2F)

• Tip: If requesting leasing – do not request utilities in operations

• Tip: If requesting leasing – do not request utilities in operations

Leasing Information (CoC – 2G)

Leasing Information (CoC – 2G)

• Tip:• Leasing is for units, facility space but - for/bed

• Utilities can be included in unit’s rent but cannot exceed unit FMR

• Tip:• Leasing is for units, facility space but - for/bed

• Utilities can be included in unit’s rent but cannot exceed unit FMR

Leasing Chart(CoC – 2G)

Leasing Chart(CoC – 2G)

• PHA utility calculations can be deducted from client’s rent contribution

• See CPD Notice CPD-96-03 Tenant Rent Calculations for McKinney Act Programs

• PHA utility calculations can be deducted from client’s rent contribution

• See CPD Notice CPD-96-03 Tenant Rent Calculations for McKinney Act Programs

Project Budget(CoC – 2H)

Project Budget(CoC – 2H)


Additional Key Information (CoC – 2I)

Additional Key Information (CoC – 2I)

• Change – Subpopulation chart title clarified – check either less than 70% or 70% or more for each subpopulation. NA for those not served.

• Change – Subpopulation chart title clarified – check either less than 70% or 70% or more for each subpopulation. NA for those not served.

Additional Key Information


Tip – Q2 PIT # of CH served in project. Important question

Change: - Q4 Indicate sponsor and applicant faith base status.

- Baseclosure question deleted

Tip – Q2 PIT # of CH served in project. Important question

Change: - Q4 Indicate sponsor and applicant faith base status.

- Baseclosure question deleted



New - Q6 - Applicant previous Federal grant recipient

- Q7 - Applicant previous SHP/S+C recipient

New – Logic Model –Webcast training April 13, 2005 See Webcast schedule on HUD.gov

New - Q6 - Applicant previous Federal grant recipient

- Q7 - Applicant previous SHP/S+C recipient

New – Logic Model –Webcast training April 13, 2005 See Webcast schedule on HUD.gov

Exhibit 2 SHP

Renewal Projects

Exhibit 2 SHP

Renewal Projects

Project Information & Budget (CoC – 2RA)


• New – Q2 – Chart 1&2 Bed and Participants• Dedicated HMIS – items 1, 2c,

3a.b.c., 4c

• New – Q2 – Chart 1&2 Bed and Participants• Dedicated HMIS – items 1, 2c,

3a.b.c., 4c



• Subpop chart – same as new project applications

• Faithbase chart – same as new project applications

• Subpop chart – same as new project applications

• Faithbase chart – same as new project applications

Supportive ServicesChart & Instructions

(CoC – 2RB)

Supportive ServicesChart & Instructions

(CoC – 2RB)


HMIS Budget (CoC – 2RC)

HMIS Budget (CoC – 2RC)

• No change to budget form Tip: - Shared HMIS complete total boxes on budget

• New: Question 4-a&b – similar but not the same as new project application

• No change to budget form Tip: - Shared HMIS complete total boxes on budget

• New: Question 4-a&b – similar but not the same as new project application

Operating Costs Budget (CoC – 2RD)

Operating Costs Budget (CoC – 2RD)


Exhibit 3 S+C

New Projects

Exhibit 3 S+C

New Projects

S+C Component Comparisons

(CoC – 3A)

S+C Component Comparisons

(CoC – 3A)


S+C Project Narrative (CoC – 3B)

S+C Project Narrative (CoC – 3B)

• Same revisions as SHP (project summary, population served, housing and services narrative, HMIS)

• Same revisions as SHP (project summary, population served, housing and services narrative, HMIS)

S+C Project Narrative


• Program Goals(APR) – new narrative to describe performance measures used for homeless assistance goals: (from technical submission)

• Program Goals(APR) – new narrative to describe performance measures used for homeless assistance goals: (from technical submission)



Program Goals – • Obtain/Remain in perm. Hsg.• Increase skills and income• Achieve greater self-

determination

Program Goals – • Obtain/Remain in perm. Hsg.• Increase skills and income• Achieve greater self-

determination

Project Component/ Infor./Participant Count

(CoC-3C)

Project Component/ Infor./Participant Count

(CoC-3C)

• Check box for rents exceeding FMR

• Check box for rents exceeding FMR

S+C Project Budgets (CoC – 3D/3G)

S+C Project Budgets (CoC – 3D/3G)

• Revised FMRs published 2/28/05 (ltd changes)

• Rents < or > than FMR will be awarded as requested without adjustment (higher rents require documentation)

• Revised FMRs published 2/28/05 (ltd changes)

• Rents < or > than FMR will be awarded as requested without adjustment (higher rents require documentation)

Additional Key Information (CoC – 3H)

Additional Key Information (CoC – 3H)

Same revisions as SHP:• Number of chronic homeless based

on point in time• Query applicants if religious

organization• Check box for Logic Model, prior

receipt of Federal, McKinney-Vento funds

Same revisions as SHP:• Number of chronic homeless based

on point in time• Query applicants if religious

organization• Check box for Logic Model, prior

receipt of Federal, McKinney-Vento funds

Exhibit 3R S+C

Renewal Projects

Exhibit 3R S+C

Renewal Projects

Project Narrative/Performance/Component/Information (CoC – 3RA)

Project Narrative/Performance/Component/Information (CoC – 3RA)

• No change• Grant consolidations at grant

agreement• Remember – Expiring S+C/SRO

must request renewal here as well

• No change• Grant consolidations at grant

agreement• Remember – Expiring S+C/SRO

must request renewal here as well

Participant Count (CoC – 3RB)

Participant Count (CoC – 3RB)

• No Change• No Change

S+C Renewal Budget (CoC – 3RC)

S+C Renewal Budget (CoC – 3RC)

• Same issues as new S+C• FMRs revised 2/28/05• Rents < or > FMR awarded as

requested

• Same issues as new S+C• FMRs revised 2/28/05• Rents < or > FMR awarded as

requested

S+C Renewal Budget/SRO Only

(CoC – 3R-D)

S+C Renewal Budget/SRO Only

(CoC – 3R-D)

• No Change• Renewed at expiring contract

rent

• No Change• Renewed at expiring contract

rent

Additional Key Information (CoC – 3RE)

Additional Key Information (CoC – 3RE)

• Same additions as SHP & new

S+C, plus • Questions on HMIS

participation

• Same additions as SHP & new S+C, plus

• Questions on HMIS participation

Exhibit 4SRO

New Projects

Exhibit 4SRO

New Projects

SRO Project Narrative (CoC – 4A)

SRO Project Narrative (CoC – 4A)

• Same additions as SHP & S+C• Same additions as SHP & S+C

Project Narrative/Project

Information (CoC – 4B)

Project Narrative/Project

Information (CoC – 4B)

• Per unit cost limitation raised from $19,500 to $20,000

• Per unit cost limitation raised from $19,500 to $20,000

Budget(CoC – 4C)Budget

(CoC – 4C)

• FMR issues, same as S+C• FMR issues, same as S+C

PHA Certification(CoC – 4D)

PHA Certification(CoC – 4D)


Additional Key Information (CoC – 4E)

Additional Key Information (CoC – 4E)

• Same additions as SHP, S+C• Same additions as SHP, S+C

Application Assembly Order


Single CoC submission, three parts:

1. CoC Exhibit 12. Applicant Documentation3. Project Documentation

Single CoC submission, three parts:

1. CoC Exhibit 12. Applicant Documentation3. Project Documentation



1. CoC Exhibit 1:• Narratives and charts, CoC – A

through N• HUD-27300, Barriers

Questionnaire

1. CoC Exhibit 1:• Narratives and charts, CoC – A

through N• HUD-27300, Barriers

Questionnaire



2. Applicant Documentation: • SF-424 for each applicant,

with attached list of projects• SF-424 SUPP• Additional applicant

documentation

2. Applicant Documentation: • SF-424 for each applicant,

with attached list of projects• SF-424 SUPP• Additional applicant

documentation



3. Project Documentation: • Exhibits 2-4, in priority list

order with all forms• Documentation of sponsor

eligibility• HUD-96010, Logic Model

3. Project Documentation: • Exhibits 2-4, in priority list

order with all forms• Documentation of sponsor

eligibility• HUD-96010, Logic Model



3. Project Doc’n (cont.): • HUD-2880, Disclosure Report• HUD-2991, Cert of

Consistency with Con. Plan

3. Project Doc’n (cont.): • HUD-2880, Disclosure Report• HUD-2991, Cert of

Consistency with Con. Plan

supernofa broadcast continuum of care april 2005

Documents