t16 addressing pavement assest management-galehouse

Larry Galehouse, PE, PSLarry Galehouse, PE, PSLarry Galehouse, PE, PSLarry Galehouse, PE, PS

Director, National Center for Pavement PreservationDirector, National Center for Pavement PreservationDirector, National Center for Pavement PreservationDirector, National Center for Pavement Preservation

Larry Galehouse, PE, PSLarry Galehouse, PE, PSLarry Galehouse, PE, PSLarry Galehouse, PE, PS

Director, National Center for Pavement PreservationDirector, National Center for Pavement PreservationDirector, National Center for Pavement PreservationDirector, National Center for Pavement Preservation

April 23, 2013April 23, 2013

Signed into Law July 6, 2012P.L. 112-141

9,000

8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,0002002 2003 2004 20062005 2007 20092008 2010 201320122011

Ce

nte

rlin

e M

ile

s

8,700

4,290

• Includes urban and rural principal arterials, and

main thoroughfares that carry heavy volumes of

traffic,

• Most on the state highway system and some are on

local roads.

• Many of these local roads function as main streets

for communities and serve commercial areas and

central business districts.

• New designated NHS roadways must use AASHTO

Green Book standards to meet design expectations

required as part of the NHS classification.

• Design exceptions are remain an available

mechanism in certain situations.

• Federal law gives the state DOT authority for

selecting projects on the NHS in consultation with

local officials. This potentially gives the state DOT

a larger role in selecting projects on local roads,

though this will likely not require a burdensome

process.

SEC. 1103. DEFINITIONS.(a) Definitions- Section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—

‘‘(2) ASSET MANAGEMENT.—The term ‘asset management’means a strategic and systematic process of operating,maintaining, and improving physical assets, with a focus on both engineering and economic analysis based upon quality information, to identify a structured sequence of maintenance, preservation, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement actions that will achieve and sustain a desired state of good repair over the lifecycle of the assets at minimum practicable cost.’’;

SEC. 1507. MAINTENANCESection 116 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—

(a) Definitions- In this section, the following definitions apply:‘‘(2) PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAMS AND

ACTIVITIES.— The term ‘pavement preservation programs and activities’ means programs and activities employing a network level, long-term strategy that enhances pavement performance by using an integrated, cost-effective set of practices that extend pavement life, improve safety, and meet road user expectations.’’;

Sec. 134. Metropolitan Transportation PlanningTitle 23, United States Code, is amended—

(h) Scope of Planning Process. -(1) In general. - The metropolitan planning process for a

metropolitan planning area under this section shall provide for consideration of projects and strategies that will –(H) emphasize the preservation of the existing

transportation system.

Sec. 134. Metropolitan Transportation PlanningTitle 23, United States Code, is amended—

(i) Development of Transportation Plan. -(2) Transportation plan. - A transportation plan under

this section shall be in a form that the Secretary determines to be appropriate and shall contain, at a minimum, the following:(G) Capital investment and other strategies. -

Capital investment and other strategies to preserve the existing and projected future metropolitan transportation infrastructureand provide for multimodal capacity increases based on regional priorities and needs.

Traditional Alternative

D.I. – is distress index, a measure of pavement condition. Scale values: 100=no distress, 50=when reconstruction is required.

R.S.L. – is remaining service life, the time remaining that a pavement can be preserved.

ACTIVITY D.I.(Before)

D.I.(After)

AGELIFE

EXTEND(Years)

R.S.L.(Years)

COST(Lane-Mile)

COMMENTS

NewConstruction 100 0 25

$508,000$ 21,000

Construct CostUser Cost

Reconstruct 49 0 25 25$ 463,000$ 19,000


Total$ 971,000$ 40,000


Traditional Alternative

Analysis Period – 25 yr.

Construction = $ 508,000 per lane mile

Preservation = $ 0 per lane mile

Salvage = $ 0 per lane mile

Total Cost = $ 508,000 per lane mile



Preservation = $ 0 per lane mile

Salvage = $ 0 per lane mile


(Remaining Service Life = 0 years)

Preservation Alternative

ACTIVITY D.I.(Before)

D.I.(After)

AGELIFE

EXTEND(Years)

R.S.L.(Years)

COST(Lane-Mile)

COMMENTS

NewConstruction 100 0 25 $ 508,000

$ 12,600Construct CostUser Cost

Crack Sealing 89 94 5 2 22 $ 5,162

$ 350Construct CostUser Cost

Thin Overlay 79 0 10 8 25 $ 40,808


Crack Sealing 84 92 14 1 22 $ 5,162


Slurry Seal 67 0 20 5 21 $ 16,935$ 700


Chip Seal 86 93 25 2 18 $ 12,582$ 350


Total $ 588,649$ 23,100


Preservation Alternative



Preservation = $ 80,649 per lane mile

Salvage =($ 333,360) per lane mile




Preservation = $ 80,649 per lane mile

Salvage =($ 333,360) per lane mile


(Remaining Service Life = 18 years)

Comparison Cost

Preservation Alternative – 25 yr.


Preservation Alternative – 25 yr.


Traditional Approach – 25 yr.


Traditional Approach – 25 yr.


Alternative Savings = $ 252,711 per lane mileAlternative Savings = $ 252,711 per lane mile

Social ResponsibilityEcologyEconomy

Sustainable Development

€$%+

Sustainability means meeting present needs without compromising

the ability of future generations to meet their needs.

Economy

Ecology

Social

Responsibility

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Remaining Service Life(years)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Ne

two

rk

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Remaining Service Life(years)

6

7

8

Pe

rce

nt

of

Ne

two

rk

• Must know:

– Available Budget

– Lane Miles of Network

– Unit Costs of Work Types

– Design Life of Reconstruction &

Rehabilitation Work Types

– Life Extensions of Pavement

Preservation Treatments

• Inventory

• Traffic volume and load

• Pavement condition

• Drainage

• Maintenance

Preservation Treatments Applied to HMA Pavements

Treatment Treatment Life (yr.) Life Extension (yr.)

Rejuvenator* NA 3 - 6

Surface Sealer 0 - 1 2 - 4

Crack Sealing 3 - 8 2 - 4

Crack Filling 2 - 4 1 - 3

Slurry Seal 4 - 5 3 - 5

Micro Surfacing - Single 3 – 6 3 - 5

Micro Surfacing - Double 4 - 7 4 - 6

Chip Seal - Single 3 – 7 5 - 6

Chip Seal - Double 5 – 10 8 - 10

Ultra-thin Bonded Wearing 7 – 12 NA

Dense Graded Thin HMA 5 - 12 NA

Open Graded Thin HMA 6 - 12 NA

Hot In-place Recycling 6 - 10 NA

Cold In-place Recycling 6 - 10 NA

* Only certain rejuventors were considered

TreatmentGood

Condition(PCI=80)

Fair

Condition(PCI=60)

Poor

Condition(PCI=40)

Crack Fill 1 - 3 0 - 2 0

Crack Seal 2 - 4 1 - 3 0

Fog Seal 2 - 4 0 - 1 0

Chip Seal 5 - 6 3 - 5 0 - 3

Micro-Surfacing 4 – 6 3 - 5 1 - 4

Thin HMA 4 - 10 3 - 7 2 - 4

Terminal Threshold

PMS Data Point

Very

Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Very

Poor

Time (Years)

PMS Data PointPMS Data Point

Measured Life ExtensionMeasured Life Extension

Simply stated it is the:“right” treatment on the“right” road at the “right” time by the“right” people

• Other potential criteria

– Availability of qualified contractors

– Availability of materials

– Time (of year) of construction

– Pavement noise

– Facility downtime

– Surface friction

Conditions Addressed• Oxidation

• Maltine Replenishment

• Moisture Infiltration

100

0

50

100 - 85

IRI <95

Limitations• Initial Low Skid

Costs (yd2)

$0.80 – 0.95

Conditions Addressed• Oxidation

• Asphalt Film Thickness

• Initial Raveling

• Moisture Infiltration

100

0

50

95 - 75

IRI <95

Limitations• Initial Low Skid

Costs (yd2)

$0.25 – 0.45

Conditions Addressed• Water Infiltration

• Incompressibles

Primary Working Cracks• Transverse cracking

• Reflective cracking

100

0

50

95 - 80

IRI <95

Limitations• Must have Clean & Dry

Reservoir

Costs (yd2)

$0.55 – .90

Conditions Addressed• Water Infiltration

• Incompressibles

Non-Working Cracks

Secondary Cracks • Longitudinal cracking

• Minor block cracking

100

0

50

90 - 75

IRI <95

Limitations• Potential Hot Weather

Tracking

Costs (yd2)

$0.55 – .90

Conditions Addressed• Moisture Infiltration

• Longitudinal cracking

• Transverse cracking

• Raveling

• Friction Loss

100

0

50

85 - 70

IRI <95

Limitations• Opening to Traffic

Dependent on Set-Time

Costs (yd2)

$1.75 – 2.50




• Raveling

• Friction Loss

• Bleeding

• Rutting

100

0

50

85 - 70

IRI <95

Limitations• Mixture subject to

reflective cracking

Costs (yd2)

$2.00 – 5.00




• Block cracking

• Friction Loss

• Bleeding

100

0

50

85 - 70

IRI <95

Limitations• Longer set time

Costs (yd2)

$1.50 – 2.50

Conditions Addressed• Longitudinal cracking


• Block cracking

• Raveling

• Friction Loss

• Bleeding

• Roughness

100

0

50

85 - 65

IRI <95

Costs (yd2)

$10 – $14

Limitations• Cost



• Block cracking

• Raveling

• Friction Loss

• Bleeding

• Ride

• Splash/Spray (OGFC)

100

0

50

80 - 60

IRI <120

Costs (yd2)

$6 – $8

Limitations• Cost



• Block cracking

• Raveling

• Friction Loss

• Bleeding

• Ride

• Corrugation

100

0

50

80 - 65

IRI <170

Costs (yd2)

$1.60 – 2.60

Requires Forensics of

Existing Pavement



• Block cracking

• Raveling

• Friction Loss

• Bleeding

• Ride

• Corrugation

• Rutting

100

0

50

75 - 60

IRI <190

Costs (yd2)

$8 – $14

Requires Forensics of

Existing Pavement

Please visit us on the web at www.pavementpreservation.org

Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S.DirectorNational Center for Pavement Preservation2857 Jolly RoadOkemos, Michigan 48864(517) 432-8220 • Fax: (517) 432-8223email: [email protected]

t16 addressing pavement assest management-galehouse

Documents