task_2(1)
DESCRIPTION
Task2 JHT2TRANSCRIPT
-
A. Analyze how successful you were at strengthening or compensating for resource
weaknesses at a key point during the first years of the simulation.
A weakness for a company may mean something a firm lacks, does poorly, or a condition
placing it at a disadvantage. Resource Weakness may be due to,
x Deficiencies in know-how or expertise or competencies.
x Lack of important physical, organizational, or intangible assets.
x Missing capabilities in key areas.
Company Ds weakness in the first few years was the number of models offered. Looking at the
Market Snapshot from Year 12, shows that Company D had only 102 models offered in the
Internet Segment and 151 models in the Wholesale segment. This trend continued in the year 13,
where they offered only 100 modes in the internet Segment and 150 again in the Wholesale
Segment. Comparing Company D to its competitors, most of the competitors had more models
offered in each segment in each geographic region.
-
Analysis of this resource weakness made company D realize that they are missing out on
competitive value of a broader product line. Less number of models than the competitors meant
that the company D was unable to participate in end use segments (jogging shoes, walking shoes,
aerobics shoes, tennis shoes etc.) and give wider selection of shoe types and styles to choose
from. Company D also realized, if all the competitive factors are equal, companies with wider
models/styles selection would outsell the companies offering fewer models. To overcome this
resource weakness, Company D increased the number of models in the Internet and Wholesale
segment to stay competitive in this footwear industry. Below is the Market Analysis Snapshot
from year 14 for the North America Region. Company D maintained the number of models
offered throughout years 14-18 to stay competitive in the footwear industry.
-
B & B. 1. Analyze the actions you took to develop resource strength at a key point during
the last four years of the simulation. Analyze how competitively powerful that strength
was.
The major resource strength that was developed by Company D during the last four years of
simulation was effective use of TQM and Six-Sigma Program. TQM is a system for a customer-
focused organization that involves all employees in continual improvement. It uses strategy,
data, effective communications and involvement of every employee to integrate quality into the
culture and activities of the organization (Srb, T., 2014). Six Sigma seeks to improve the
quality of process outputs by identifying and removing the causes of defects (errors) and
minimizing variability in manufacturing and business processes (Srb, T., 2014).
This table shows that Company D spent $929,000 on TQM/Six Sigma Program in North
America and $1,776,000 in the Asia-Pacific region. Company D spent $0.54/per pair for TQM
and Six-Sigma Quality Program in the North America Region and $0.60/per pair in the Asia
Pacific Region with the average of $0.58/pair.
For Enhanced Styling/Features Company D spent $1.92 per pair in the North America Region
and only 0.75/pair in the Asia Pacific Region with the average of $1.18/pair. This was not
making our product attractive for the customers in the market when compared to its competitors.
Company D invested in these programs over the years to improve the quality of the footwear
-
produced to provide customers with good quality and best price more in line with our strategy of
Best Cost Provider. As can be seen in the Footwear Industry Overview of year 12, the overall
reject rate was 5.7% and the costs incurred due to rejected pairs were $1.04 per pair.
By year 18, Company D got a good grip on Total Quality Management Program. They invested
and to build a good process for the company. By the year 18, they were spending on an average
of $2.68/pair, making it a good quality product in the market thats desirable by the customer, on
the TQM/6-sigma quality program and the costs due to rejected pairs also went down to
$0.61/pair saving money for Company D.
The below table, footwear industry overview shows that the overall reject rate was 4.3
-
These improvements made our products more desirable by the customers and the reject rate also
added to the increase in Net Profits for the company. As can be seen in the income statement
comparison from year 12 and year 18, there is a huge difference in the operating profit of the
company.
The operating profit was $41,607,000 for the year 12, i.e. $8.14/pair. The operating profit for
Year 18 was $11.95/pair.
-
Analysis of the resources competitive power,
Competitively Valuable Decision to invest in TQM and Six Sigma program is directly in line
with the company strategy of a broad cost leader. Under this strategy providing a quality product
to the customer is of high importance. This had made the company a more effective competitor.
This is evident from the scoreboard comparisons from year 13 and year 18 below.
Company D moved from 10th spot in year 13 to 5th spot in the Year 18.
-
Rare Resource Investing in TQM and Six-Sigma program produced quality goods for Asia-
Pacific and Latin America regions, where a quality product is not a widely available as it does in
North America and Europe Asia. So this became a source of competitive Advantage in the
Asian and Latin American market for Company D. Comparison of Operating Profit for years 17
and 18 in these regions for Company D shows that there has been a drastic increase within one-
year period.
C. Evaluate your approach to managing an organizational culture that supports strategic
plan execution.
An organizational culture is the culture of the organization in simple words. Having a culture
lets an organization define employee expectations. It is important for an organization because it
consists of beliefs, ideologies, principles and values of the organization. The culture of the
workplace controls the way employees behave amongst themselves as well as with people
outside the organization.
Company Ds decisions and strategy were more closely aligned to a Market Culture.
-
Organizations with this culture are driven by competition and a strong desire to deliver results
and accomplish goals (Kreitner, R., 2009).
This culture, on which company Ds decisions were based on, has external focus. The goal is to
drive towards productivity, profits and customer satisfaction. The employees are expected to
react fast, work hard and deliver quality work on time. People who deliver results are rewarded
in this culture.
This culture best suited for our strategy of best cost provider. The companys main focus is to
target customers who are value conscious and to provide better goods at attractive prices and also
aggressive marketing and providing matching prices that of rivals with better features in the
product.
Company Ds organizational culture was a source of competitive advantage. As an organization
it functioned to deliver quality footwear that was above the industry average as can be seen in the
Year 18 distribution and warehouse report.
Company D also kept the costs lower by incorporating an organizational culture that enables
cutting down costs and keep the warehouse operations cost to a minimum.
-
Companies with market cultures tend to have more positive organizational outcomes. Managers
are encouraged to consider how they might make their cultures more market oriented. Customer
satisfaction is most strongly related to market cultures in line with the Broad Cost Leader
Strategy. This can be seen in the marketing report. Company D constantly invested average of
$4.00/pair in marketing efforts in all regions. This shows that they have achieved a good
organizational culture that supports the strategic plan of customer service, attractive prices and
low cost.
-
C. 1. Compare your approach with proven management practices.
Staff the organization with managers and employees capable of executing the strategy well.
Company D spent $500K each year in the workforce diversity program for testing screening and
hiring employees. This enabled company D to staff the organization with employees that are
motivated and capable of performing their roles for the company to execute their strategy.
Adopt best practices and business processes that drive continuous improvement in strategy
execution activities.
Company D spent $250K each year in the Ethics training and Enforcement not only for
Managers in the organization but for all employees. This strengthened the organization by
empowering Managers and leaders to have high ethical principles and standards. This in turn
helped company D to have a good repute and achieve the objectives of Company Ds strategy.
-
Install information and operating systems that enable company personnel to carry out their
strategic roles proficiently.
Having the right technology for the employees makes communication, implementation of
decisions and carrying out day-to-day activities much efficiently. Company D realizes that and
has financed in this section consistently to improve and keep it updated. This is evident in the
other corporate overhead costs, which was $1.22/pair sold in all geographic regions. This cost
was very consistently in this range as company D invested continually in keeping up to date with
the technology to smoothen the internal business processes for company personnel.
Tie rewards and incentives directly to the achievement of strategic and financial targets.
Company D increased the incentive pay based on the production target, as can be seen in the
North America and Asia Europe plants for year 14 and 15. Company D increased the incentive
per non-rejected pair from $0.70 to $1.00 in North America and from $0.50 in Asia Pacific
region to motivate employees to produce a quality product to achieve financial targets.
-
Instill a corporate culture that promotes good strategy execution.
Company Ds corporate culture is Market Culture. This culture gives market D to get approach
thats needed to be Broad Cost Leader in the market place. The organizational culture and the
strategy go hand in hand as the internal process and focus is important for any organization for
executing the strategy.
D. Evaluate your promotion of creativity and innovation during the simulation.
Creativity is the process of generating new and useful ideas. Innovation, on the other hand, is
taking a new idea and putting it to use.
Creating the environment for Creativity The right organizational culture, resources available
for experimentation, collaboration in work groups and interesting work help create the ideal
context for employee creativity.
Organizational culture Culture is the set of shared norms, values and beliefs in an
organization. Company D has market culture, which has external focus. Customer Satisfaction
being the utmost important thing, Company D focused on creating Green Footwear. They
started using Green Footwear Materials creatively and used Recycled Packaging for the
footwear. Company D showed value of creativity by providing rewards and recognition in
incentives to the employees. But such a climate can get corrupted by political game-playing and
-
interpersonal competition, which will restrain creativity, Company D spent consistently towards
its Ethics Program for all employees throughout the years 11 18 not only for managers but for
all employees of the company.
Resources for experimentation Creativity and innovation is result of experimentation which is
resource intensive. To promote creativity, Company D permitted funds, materials, facilities, and
the time needed for experimenting with new ideas by investing in the Green Recycled footwear
materials.
Collaboration History's great innovations have often been the result of collaboration. Work
groups that have diversely skilled members, an openness to new ideas, high levels of trust,
commitment to their work, and good communication foster creativity. Company D invests in a
Workforce Diversity program to help with this collaboration aspect of creativity to they have
better culture which as diverse employees working in harmony. This also gives them a variety of
creative ideas, suggestions that the management can take up on and make it a mainstream
product or strategy focus towards company D objectives.
-
E. Analyze the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard employed in the simulation in terms
of how its use affected individual performance.
Balanced Scorecard helps an organization to increase focus on strategy and results, focus on the
drivers of future performance, prioritize their initiatives and projects, and improves
communications of organizations vision and strategy.
Balanced Scorecard helped Company D to increase focus on their strategy and results. The
company strived to improve its EPS every year to meet the investor expectations. For the years
11-17 EPS was below Investor Expectations, but consistent effort by Company D gave them an
EPS of $52.18 for year 18 which was above the investor expectation of $48.75 per share.
Company D and its competitors image rating is based on their branded S/Q ratings in each
geographic region and market share for their products as well as their efforts to demonstrate
good corporate citizenship and their ability to conduct business in a socially responsible manner.
How well Company D does in sales and profits depends greatly on their image rating and credit
rating. To monitor this was critical for Companys Success. The Scorecard of Image Rating
-
helped them achieve just this. Company D always kept image rating above the Investor
Expectations aligning their vision and strategy with the help of the Image rating scorecard.
E.1. Explain how you would develop a balanced scorecard that ensures appropriate
emphasis on both leading and lagging indicators.
Balanced Scorecard A performance metric used in strategic management to identify and
improve various internal functions and their resulting external outcomes. The balanced
scorecard attempts to measure and provide feedback to organizations in order to assist in
implementing strategies and objectives (Investopedia, 2014).
Leading Indicators These signal future events and also called performance drivers. An
example is, Satisfied/Motivated employees are a leading indicator of Customer Satisfaction.
Lagging Indicators They do not predict but confirm a long-term trend which is an important
ability of this indicator to confirm that a pattern is occurring or about to occur. These are also
called outcome measures.
When developing a Balanced Scorecard (or any other performance management system), it is
recommended to use a combination of Leading and Lagging Indicator because there is cause and
-
effect chain of objectives and strategies and there is corresponding chain of leading and lagging
indicators.
Leading indicators without lagging indicators may enable a company to focus on short term
performance but they will not be able to confirm broader organizational outcomes have been
achieved. Leading indicators enable a company to take pre-emptive actions to improve chances
of achieving strategic goals. Lagging indicators without the leading indicators tell nothing about
how the outcomes will be achieved, nor do they have any early warnings signs about being on
track to achieve strategic goals.
Company Ds Balanced Scorecard identified cost efficiency can be improved by investing in high
performance process like TQM and Six Sigma Program. These processes are leading indicator of
cost efficiency. So Company D invested heavily on Six Sigma program to reduce costs as can be
seen in the table below.
-
Company D was investing highest in the industry of $2.50/pair of capacity for year 17 and 18 than
the industry average of only $0.68 and 0.79/pair of capacity for years 17 and 18 respectively.
Though the total manufacturing costs per pair produced were higher than the industry average,
Company D is on the right track of cost efficiency in the future years as high performance
process like Six Sigma is a leading indicator of cost efficiency.
References
Srb, Thomas (2014) Retrieved from https://www.xeneta.com/blog/how-to-implement-total-
quality-management-and-six-sigma/
Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational Behavior [VitalSouce bookshelf version]. Retrieved from
http://online.vitalsource.com/books/0077771788/id/B3-15
Balanced Scorecard (2014) Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/balanced
scorecard.asp