testing a new astronomical data reduction technique on er cepheius
DESCRIPTION
Testing a New Astronomical Data Reduction Technique on ER CEPHEIUS. Robert Parish Stephen F. Austin State University Department of Physics and Astronomy [email protected]. Different Types of Eclipsing Binaries. Obtaining Data. Variable Star. V(t). Telescope. Obtaining Data. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Testing a New Astronomical Data Reduction Technique on ER CEPHEIUS
Robert ParishStephen F. Austin State University
Department of Physics and [email protected]
Different Types of Eclipsing Binaries
Telescope
Obtaining Data
V(t)
Variable Star
D(t) = A(t)V(t)
Variable StarObtaining Data
Telescope
D(t) = A(t)V(t)+S(t)
Obtaining Data
Telescope
D(t) = A(t)V(t)
Telescope
D(x,y,t)=F(x,y) [A(t)V(t)+S(t)]
D(x,y,t)=N(x,y) + F(x,y) [A(t)V(t)+S(t)]
Noise
Obtaining Data
Current Technique
ND(x,y) F(x,y)
NB(x,y)D(x,y,t)
D
Dp
Current Technique
CComparison Star
SSky Brightness
𝑉 (𝑡 )𝐶 =
𝐷𝑃 (𝑥 , 𝑦 , 𝑡 )−S (𝑥3 , 𝑦 3 ,𝑡 )C (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ,𝑡 )−S (𝑥3 , 𝑦 3, 𝑡 )
Variable StarDp
Current Technique – Problems
• Obtaining a Proper Flat Field– Sky Flats, Box Flats, “Shirt Flats”
• Maintaining CCD temperature Between Dark and Light Frames
• Variable System Noise• Incorrect Calibration Procedures
A New Approach
• Fix Current Technique Problems by– Eliminating the need for dark, flat and bias frames– Removing user error by automating the calibration
process
A New Approach
@ time t @ time t+Δt
A New Approach
D
C
S
A New Approach
D
C
S
A New Approach - Derivation
𝑉 (𝑡 )𝐶 =
𝐷 (𝑥 , 𝑦 , 𝑡 )−𝐷 (𝑥 , 𝑦 , 𝑡2 )+𝑆 (𝑥3 , 𝑦3 ,𝑡 2 )−𝑆 (𝑥3 , 𝑦3 , 𝑡 )𝐶 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 , 𝑡 )−𝐶 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 , 𝑡2 )+𝑆 (𝑥3 , 𝑦3 ,𝑡 2 )−𝑆 (𝑥3 , 𝑦3 , 𝑡 )
D
D
S
S
C
C
ER CEP. in NGC188
Testing – Check Star
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 4500
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
New Approach
Image Number
Rela
tive
Inte
nsity
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 4500
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Conventional Method
Image Number
Rela
tive
Inte
nsity
Testing – Variable 3
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Raw Star Intensity
Image Number
Inte
nsity
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Conventional Method - Variable 3 in NGC188
Phase
Rela
tive
Inte
nsity
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
New Approach - Variable 3 in NGC188
Phase
Rela
tve
Inte
nsity
• Visual Band• Published Period1 P = .30652d
Approximate Period Calculations:• Conventional Method
P = .2857d• New Approach
P = .2860d• Percent Difference
.11% or 25.92seconds
Running Average
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Phase
Diff
eren
tial M
agni
tude
Screen Shot of Application
Running Average with Theory
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Phase
Diff
eren
tial M
agni
tude
Convergent Solutions
• Using Starlight Pro and Excel• Recalculate the solution based on minute
changes in chosen parameters• Linear Least Squares formula used to calculate
the error between the Average Light Curve and Theoretical Solution
• 3D Plots of Parameter 1, Parameter 2, and Error
0.00E+00
8.00E-03
1.60E-02
2.40E-02
3.20E-02
4.00E-02
4.80E-02
5.60E-02
6.40E-02
7.20E-02
8.00E-02
8.80E-02
9.60E-02
1.04E-01
1.12E-01
1.20E-011.28E-01
1.36E-011.44E-01
1.52E-01
Mass Ratio
Erro
r
Inclination
i = 81°Error = .0406
4500
4700
4900
5100
5300
5500
5700
5900
6100
6300
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
4500
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5400
5500
5600
5700
5800
5900
6000
6100
6200
6300
Star2 Temperature
Erro
r
Star1 Temperature
T1 >100k + T2Error = .0391
0.4170.42
0.4230.4260.4290.4320.4350.4380.4410.4440.447
0.450.4530.456
3.80E-02
4.00E-02
4.20E-02
4.40E-02
4.60E-02
4.80E-02
5.00E-02
45004530
45604590
46204650
46804710
47404770
4800
Star2 Radius
Erro
r
Star2 TemperatureR2 = .328T2 = 4640KError = .0380
0.030.03180.03360.03540.0372
0.0390.04080.04260.04440.0462
0.0480.0498
0.05160000000000010.0534
0.05520000000000010.05700000000000010.05880000000000010.06060000000000010.06240000000000010.06420000000000010.0660000000000001
4500 4520 4540 4560 4580 4600 4620 46404660 4680 4700 4720 4740 4760 4780 4800
Mass Ratio
Erro
r
Star2 Temperatureq = .506T2 = 4640KError = .0374
ER Cepheius Starlight Pro Model
Animation Created with StarLight Pro http://www.midnightkite.com/binstar.html
i = 81°q = .506R1= .439T1= 4740KR2 = .328T2 = 4640KError = .0334
References (UPDATE THIS PAGE)1. X.B. Zhang, “A CCD Photometric Survey of Variable Stars in the
Field of NGC188,” Astron. J. 123, pp.1548, 2002.2. R.M. Branly, “Light Curve Solutions for Eclipsing Binaries
in NGC 188,” Astro. Sp. Sci 235, pp.149-160, 1996.3. W.H. Richardson, “Bayesian-based iterative method of image
restoration,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 62, pp.55-59, 1972.4. L.B. Lucy, “An iterative technique for the rectification of observed
distribution,” Astron. J. 79, pp.745-754, 1974.5. J.L. Starck, Astronomical Image and Data Analysis, Springer, 2002.6. R. Wodaski, The New CCD Astronomy, New Astronomy Press, 2002.