thackway national cond
DESCRIPTION
VAST-2 – Condition assessment method. Presentation given to the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), National Condition Workshop held at the Mt Lofty House, Adelaide on 11-13 June 2014TRANSCRIPT
VAST-2 – Condition assessment method
Richard Thackway
Presentation to National Condition Workshop, Adelaide
11-13 June 2014
Outline
• Concepts• Drivers of information native vegetation information• VAST a framework • Why was VAST-2 developed?• Overview of VAST-2• Example of assessment• Where to next
Definitions - Condition and transformation
• Change in a plant community (type) due to effects of land management practices (LMP):
– Structure
– Composition
– Regenerative capacity
• Resilience = the capacity of a plant community to recover toward a reference state following a change/s in land management
• Transformation = changes to vegetation condition over time• Condition, resilience and transformation are assessed relative
to fully natural a reference state
Vegetation condition
Regulation of hydrological regime Generation of food and fibre Regulation of climate / microclimate Generation of raw materials Recycling of organic matter Creating and regulating habitats Controlling reproduction and dispersal
Land management changes ecological function to derive multiple benefits (ecosystem services)
landscape
transformation
Drivers of info on native veg condition
• Design and implement NRM policy and programs e.g.– Protecting threatened plant communities under the EPBC ACT– Guidelines for enhancing over-cleared landscapes– Setting thresholds for environmental flows
• Resource condition of native vegetation e.g.– Tracking status, change and trend in, natural resources e.g. SoE, SoFR,
connectivity – Environmental accounting e.g. native veg account Wentworth Group
• Monitoring and reporting e.g.– Outcomes of investment incl. performance reporting e.g. envt flows– Long term transformation of vegetated landscapes
Information on condition is needed for the following steps in NRM
Vegetation Assets States and Transitions (VAST) framework
VIVIVIIIIII0
Native vegetationcover
Non-native vegetationcover
Increasing modification caused by land management
Transitions = trend
Vegetation thresholds
Reference for each veg type (NVIS)
VAST - A framework for assessing & reporting vegetation condition
Condition states
Residual or unmodified
Naturally bare
Modified Transformed Replaced -Adventive
Replaced - managed
Replaced - removed
Thackway & Lesslie (2008) Environmental Management, 42, 572-90
Diagnostic attributes of VAST states:• Vegetation structure• Species composition• Regenerative capacity
NVIS
Vegetation condition – a snapshot (2010)
Thackway & Lesslie (2008) Environmental Management, 42, 572-90
NB: Input dataset biophysical naturalness reclassified using VAST framework
/ replaced
/ unmodified
Naracoorte Coastal Plan
Reporting change in condition
using Vegetation
Types (NVIS/MVG),
and vegetation condition
(VAST)
Source: ABARES 2013
Veg condition
derived fr
om effects
of land m
anagement
practice
s
Veg type (NVIS/MVG)
NVIS: National Vegetation Information SystemMVG: Major Vegetation Groups
VAST
To enable improved national assessment and reporting of change and trend over time using the VAST framework by
Tracking the effects of land management on core attributes of• Vegetation structure• Species composition• Regenerative capacity
To help answer key questions:• What is this landscape’s story of change to native veg?
• past and present• Can we use that knowledge to help land managers restore and or
enhance their native vegetation?
Why was VAST-2 developed?
Occupation
Relaxation
Anthropogenic change
Net gain/benefit
Time
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Veg
etat
ion
mod
ifica
tion
scor
e
Reference
VAST-2 transformation pathway - model
Based on Hamilton, Brown & Nolan 2008. FWPA PRO7.1050. pg 18Land use impacts on biodiversity and Life Cycle Analysis
VAST-2 assesses effects of land management on attributes of native veg condition over time
Land managers use land management practices (LMP) to influence ecological function at sites and across landscapes by:• Modifying • Removing and replacing• Enhancing• Restoring• Maintaining• Improving
The effects of these practices can be observed /measured in changes in variables/attributes:• Vegetation structure• Species composition and • Regenerative capacity
LUMIS
LUMIS = Land Use and Management Information System
VAST-2 focuses on tracking effects of land management on 10 attribute groups/criteria
Soil
Vegetation
Regenerative capacity/ function
Vegetation structure & Species composition
1. Soil hydrological status2. Soil physical status3. Soil chemical status4. Soil biological status5. Fire regime6. Reproductive potential7. Overstorey structure8. Understorey structure9. Overstorey composition10. Understorey composition
LUMIS = Land Use and Management Information System
Generate total indices for ‘transformation site’ for each year of the historical record. Validate using Expert Knowledge
• Compile and collate effects of land management on criteria (10) and
indicators (22) over time. • Evaluate impacts on the plant
community over time
Transformation site• Compile and collate effects of
land management on criteria (10) and indicators (22)
Reference state/sites
Score all 22 indicators for ‘transformation site’ relative to the ‘reference site’. 0 = major change; 1 = no change
Derive weighted indices for the ‘transformation site’ i.e. regenerative capacity (58%), vegetation structure (27%) and species composition (18%)
by adding predefined indicators
General process for tracking change over time using the VAST-2 system
Data synthesis and hierarchySite
Transformation score/site /year 1
Diagnostic attributes 3
Criteria i.e. attribute groups
10
Indicators / attribute
22
1
3
10
22
Dia
gn
ost
icat
trib
ute
s
Regenerativecapacity
Vegetationstructure
Speciescomposition
VegetationTransformation
score
reprodpotent
understoreyoverstoreyfire soil
structure nutrients biology
overstorey understorey
Att
rib
ute
gro
up
s
hydrology
Data synthesis and hierarchy
Ind
icat
ors
/at
trib
ute
s
Diagnostic attributes (3)
[VAST]
Attribute groups /criteria
(10)Indicators/attributes of vegetation and ecological processes
(22)
Regenerative capacity
Fire regime 1. Area /size of fire foot prints
2. Number of fire starts
Soil hydrology 3. Soil surface water availability
4. Ground water availability
Soil physical state
5. Depth of the A horizon
6. Soil structure
Soil nutrient state
7. Nutrient stress – rundown (deficiency) relative to soil fertility
8. Nutrient stress – excess (toxicity) relative to soil fertility
Soil biological state
9. Recyclers responsible for maintaining soil porosity and nutrient recycling
10. Surface organic matter, soil crusts
Reproductive potential
11. Reproductive potential of overstorey structuring species
12. Reproductive potential of understorey structuring species
Vegetation structure
Overstorey structure
13. Overstorey top height (mean) of the plant community
14. Overstorey foliage projective cover (mean) of the plant community
15. Overstorey structural diversity (i.e. a diversity of age classes) of the stand
Understorey structure
16. Understorey top height (mean) of the plant community
17. Understorey ground cover (mean) of the plant community
18. Understorey structural diversity (i.e. a diversity of age classes) of the plant
Species Composition
Overstorey composition
19. Densities of overstorey species functional groups
20. Relative number of overstorey species (richness) of indigenous :exotic spp
Understorey composition
21. Densities of understorey species functional groups
22. Relative number of understorey species (richness) of indigenous :exotic spp
Importance of dynamics
Rainfall is assumed to be main driver of ecosystem dynamics• Period 1900 - 2014• Average seasonal rainfall (summer, autumn, …)• Rainfall anomaly is calculated above and below the mean• Two year running trend line fitted
WA Wheatbelt BOM rainfall anomaly 1900-2010(modelled 5 km resolution)
Derived from monthly modelled rainfall data obtained from http://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Rainfall anomaly relative to mean
Method: VAST-2
Species
composition
LMP = Land Management Practices
Effects on attributes, attribute groups and diagnostic attributes
LMPYear
Time
Vegetation structure Regenerative
capacity
Cause
Certainty level standards used to compile historic record
Certainty level standards
Spatial precision(Scale)
Temporal precision(Year of observation)
Attribute accuracy(Land use, land
management practices, effects on condition)
HIGH "Definite”
Reliable direct quantitative data.
Code: 1
Reliable direct quantitative data.
Code: 4
Reliable direct quantitative data.
Code: 7
MEDIUM "Probable
"
Direct (with qualifications) or strong
indirect data.
Code: 2
Direct (with qualifications) or strong
indirect data.
Code: 5
Direct (with qualifications) or strong
indirect data.
Code: 8
LOW "Possible"
Limited qualitative and possibly contradictory
observations. More data needed.
Code: 3
Limited qualitative and possibly contradictory
observations. More data needed.
Code: 6
Limited qualitative and possibly contradictory
observations. More data needed.
Code: 9
VAST-2 key attribute groups Reference state
Transformationsite
Fire regime * *Soil hydrology * *Soil physical state * **Soil nutrient state ** *Soil biological state * *Reproductive potential *** ***Overstorey vegetation structure *** **
Understorey vegetation structure *** ***
Overstorey species composition *** ***
Understorey species composition *** ***
*** Quantitative data /info * Qualitative data /info
Example: Bridge Hill Ridge- post mining restoration
Predictions of mature forest (Bunning’s Enquiry 1974)
Example: Bridge Hill Ridge- post mining restoration
Where to next?
• More sites• Scaling up change to the landscape scale
– Indicators were chosen to scale up– Soil Assets States and Trends (CSIRO) – Modeling/remote sensing
• Narrative – Proposal submitted to Fenner School– Historical – Current– Future
Paddock to national scale assessments
TERN AusCover and its infrastructure is providing the potential to monitor several key ecological indicators across Australia at the paddock scale every month e.g. Ground cover (other colours) and FPC (green)
List of VAST-2 attributes/ indicators (22) Best source spatial data
Time series or modeled Year/ RS source
1. Area /size of fire foot prints TERN AusCover Time series (RS) >2000 MODIS
2. Number of fire starts TERN AusCover Time series (RS) >2000 MODIS
3. Soil surface water availability CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
4. Ground water availability GA & CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
5. Depth of the A horizon CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
6. Soil structure CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
7. Nutrient stress – rundown (deficiency) relative to soil fertility CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
8. Nutrient stress – excess (toxicity) relative to soil fertility CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
9. Recyclers responsible for maintaining soil porosity and nutrient recycling ?? Modeled epochs NA
10. Surface organic matter, soil crusts CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
11. Reproductive potential of overstorey structuring species CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
12. Reproductive potential of understorey structuring species CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
13. Overstorey top height (mean) of the plant community TERN AusCover Snap shot (RS) 2009 Alos/Landsat/ ICESAT
14. Overstorey foliage projective cover (mean) of the plant community TERN AusCover Time series (RS) 2000-10 Landsat
15. Overstorey structural diversity (i.e. a diversity of age classes) of the stand TERN AusCover Snap shot (RS) 2009 Alos/Landsat/ ICESAT
16. Understorey top height (mean) of the plant community TERN AusCover Snap shot (RS) 2009 Alos/Landsat/ ICESAT
17. Understorey ground cover (mean) of plant community (fractional cover) TERN AusCover Time series (RS) 2000-10 Landsat
18. Understorey structural diversity (i.e. a diversity of age classes) of the plant CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
19. Densities of overstorey species functional groups (biomass) CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
20. Relative number of overstorey species (richness) of indigenous :exotic spp CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
21. Densities of understorey species functional groups (biomass) CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
22. Relative number of understorey species (richness) of indigenous :exotic spp CSIRO Modeled epochs NA
Conclusions
VAST-2:• VAST and VAST-2 are integrated • Is a conceptual framework for assessing & reporting effects of
land management on plant communities over time• Has been applied in a wide range of bioregional contexts, to:
– monitor outcomes – evaluate progress towards targets – inform the design of research and experimental programs re adaptive
management – tell the story of landscape transformation
• Has relevance to managing biodiversity• Should be applied at the landscape level
Summary of VAST-2 method (1/2)
• Establishes sites = ~ land unit i.e. homogeneous soil-landform
• Establishes a reference site and transformation site • Change is assessed relative to a reference state• Uses a multi-criteria assessment method• Tracks the effects of LMP on core attributes of veg condition
to build a historical record for a site/s of change • Uses an information hierarchy to assess change
– Level 1 = Single transformation score at a point in time– Level 2 = VAST’s diagnostic attributes (VS, SC & RC)– Level 3 = 10 attribute groups/ key ecological criteria – Level 4 = 22 attributes/ core indicators
• Sources of data /info many and varied • Indicators are populated from qualitative and quantitative data
sources over time• Dynamics are critical to assessing affects of LMP on natural
productivity = long-term average monthly rainfall (5km grid)• Establishes a network of key collaborators for a site/s ecologists
and land managers • Timeline starts ~1750 and assumes an indigenous managed
landscape • Gaps in historical records are filled using expert elicitation• Use peer review to assess the veracity and accuracy of the
assessment • List of attributes derived from lit review and LUMIS• List of attributes selected to operate at site and landscape levels
Summary of VAST-2 method (2/2)
More info & Acknowledgements
More information http://www.vasttransformations.com/
Acknowledgements• TERN ACEAS funded my sabbatical fellowship at the University of
Queensland, Brisbane in 2010-11• CSIRO Ecosystems Sciences for hosting me as a visiting research
scientist, Canberra in 2010-11• Many public and private land managers, land management agencies,
consultants and researchers have provided data and information