the fines research roadmap 2025_missikoff
DESCRIPTION
Michele Missikoff from CNR presented the FInES Research Roadmap 2025 (FInES Cluster Meeting, March 2012)TRANSCRIPT
FInES Research Roadmap 2025
Key changes in FRR v2.0Michele Missikoff (CNR)
FInES RR RapporteurTask Force of the FInES Cluster, Unit D4
DG Information Society and Media
March [email protected]
Recap of phases and timingFRR v1.0 released after a first online consultation
(Aug 2011)FRR v1.2 released after various syncronous
consultations; Conference Call, dedicated meetings, sessions in FInES Cluster meetings (Oct 2011)
FRR v1.9 released after extensive consultations, both online and sync. Including a dedicated Knowledge Cafe (Feb 2012)
FRR v2.0. Current versionFRR v3.0. Availble Aug 2012, after wide
consultationFRR MoW. Moving the FRR to the Web (Aug ‘12).
••• 2
Coexisting versions-Stable-Dynamic
Pierluigi Assogna
CNR
BruxellesBruxelles, , March 13thMarch 13th--14th14th, 201, 20122
• Editorial Board (EB ): restricted team that has the objective of writing the document
• Scientific Advisory Group (SAG): a group of 15 members who have been invited and accepted to cooperate in the elaboration and validation of the first version of the Research Roadmap
• Expert Scientific Committee (ESC): committee of 15 members appointed after a selection process with the goal of supporting the Ensemble project in its different articulations
• FInES Cluster RR Coordination (CRRC): a restricted informal group, coordinated by the FInES Cluster Chair and Co-chair, with the participation of the cluster support staff, Diana Vlad-Calcic, the EB, plus specific invitees depending on the agenda
• FInES Cluster Projects
FInES Cluster Knowledge Café: Future Internet-based Enterprise Systems - 12 October 2011
FInES Cluster Knowledge Café: Enabling and Supporting Technologies - 12 October 2011
EB in the occasion of the ENSEMBLE General Meeting in Lisbon
Conference Call of EB and Ensemble on 19 January 2012
Conference call with CRRC on 6 February 2012
All together, more than
1.500 contributions
Cluster Research Roadmap Coordination meeting of 29 September 2011
Socio-economic Space
Scenario
RR Conceptual node“Leviathan” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
The need for a socio-economic discontinuity High High High High
Different growths for wealth and well-being in reduced economic expansion High Medium Low High
Towards a totally connected Society Medium High Low High
Innovation in a Knowledge- based Society Low Low Medium High
Future Internet Enterprises Space - 1
Scenario
RR Conceptual node“Leviathan” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
Qualities of BeingQB1. Humanistic Enterprise Low Low Medium High
QB2. Inventive Enterprise High High High High
QB3. Agile Enterprise High High Medium Low
QB4. Cognisant Enterprise High High Medium Medium
QB5. Sensing Enterprise. High High Low Low
Future Internet Enterprises Space - 2
Scenario
RR Conceptual node“Leviathan” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
Qualities of Being
QB6. Community- oriented Enterprise. Medium Medium Low High
QB7. Cloud Enterprise. High High Medium Medium
QB8. Glocal Enterprise. Medium Medium Medium Medium
QB9. Sustainable Enterprise High Low Low High
Future Internet Enterprises Space - 3Scenario
RR Conceptual node
“Leviathan ” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
Operational dimension
Invent High High High High
Plan High High High High
Build High High High High
Operate High High High High
Manage & Monitor High High High High
Dismiss High High High High
Enterprise Systems Space - 1 Scenario
RR Conceptual node“Leviathan ” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
Knowledge dimension
RC1. Unified Digital Enterprise High High Medium Medium
RC2. Linked Open Knowledge. High Medium Medium High
RC3. Complex Systems Modelling. High High High High
Enterprise Systems Space - 2 Scenario
RR Conceptual node“Leviathan ” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
Application dimension
RC4. Innovation-oriented enterprise production platforms High High High High
RC5. Unified Digital Enterprise (UDE) Management System Medium Medium High High
RC6. Cooperation and collaboration platforms. High High Medium High
Enterprise Systems Space - 3 Scenario
RR Conceptual node“Leviathan ” Economy
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie” Economy
Engineering dimension
RC7. Proactive FInES Mashup High High Medium Medium
RC8. Autonomic Computing Components and Subsystems. High High Low Low
RC9. Flexible Execution platforms. High High Medium Medium
Technology Space
Scenario
RR Conceptual node
“Leviath an” Econom y
“Big Brother” Economy
“Gold Rush” Economy
“Hippie ” Econo my
Future networking technologies High High Medium Medium
Future Knowledge technologies High High High High
Future application technologies and complex systems engineering High High High High
Future computational and storage technologies High High High High
Future Natural Interaction High High Medium Medium
Key improvements of FRR v2.0
• Global synoptic map of the FRR knowledge
• New Chapter 5, with innovative strategy for Gap Analysis and routing to innovation
• Significant improvement of the prose and figures
• Extensive elaboration of annexes••• 28
The 4 FInES Knowledge Spaces
1. Socio-economic Space
2. Enterprise Space
3. Future Enterprise Systems
4. Enabling Technology Space
••• 29
The positioning of FInES Spaces
••• 30
Socio‐economic
Enterprise
FInES
Technolog y
Syn
op
tic view
the
4 FIn
ES
Sp
ace
s
••• 31
Socio‐economic Space
EnterpriseSpace
Humanistic
Inventive
Agile
Sensing
Community ‐
oriented
Cognitive
Liquid
Sustainable
Glocal(Enterprise Quality
)
FInESSpace
Enterprise Knowledge Application Systems FInES Engineering
RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC5 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9
Networking
Knowledge Tech App Software Computing &
StorageNatural
InteractionTechnologySpace
Social requirements,
DriversImpacts
Business
requirements, Functions
Technical
requirements,
Enablers
Operational
Dimension
The 3 clouds of FInES
••• 32
Enterprise and
Business Cloud
Enterprise Software
Cloud
ClientsHR
Stocks
Suppliers
Products
XX..
Enterprise Knowledge
Cloud
Achieving the FInES VisionThe key difference of mid-term/focused vs
long-term/wide-scope Research Roadmap
Focused Mid-term RR – A focused domain (e.g., Nanotechnologies)– Define the Start A (SotA), extrapolate
Destination B, define the road from A to B– typically a Gartner, Accenture, ... business
Vision-based / Long-term RR– Start from a Vision, apply a regression process.– Portray a constellation of Enterprise solutions– Bridge the gap between Vision and Enterp Sol
••• 33
From SotA to Vision
••• 34
From Vision to SotA
••• 35
Migration on a Web-basedCollaborative FInES platform
March 2012
Syn
op
tic view
the
4 FIn
ES
Sp
ace
s
••• 37
Socio‐economic Space
EnterpriseSpace
Humanistic
Inventive
Agile
Sensing
Community ‐
oriented
Cognitive
Liquid
Sustainable
Glocal(Enterprise Quality
)
FInESSpace
Enterprise Knowledge Application Systems FInES Engineering
RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC5 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9
Networking
Knowledge Tech App Software Computing &
StorageNatural
InteractionTechnologySpace
Social requirements,
DriversImpacts
Business
requirements, Functions
Technical
requirements,
Enablers
Operational
Dimension
1. A Vision on the Socio-economic Space in 2025
1. The need for a socio-economic discontinuity
2. Different growths for wealth and well-being in reduced economic expansion
3. Towards a totally connected Society
4. Innovation in a Knowledge-based Society
••• 38
2. The Future Internet-based Enterprise
2a - Quality of Being: a first characterization1.Humanistic Enterprise2.Inventive Enterprise3.Agile Enterprise4.Cognisant Enterprise5.Sensing Enterprise6.Community-oriented Enterprise7.Liquid Enterprise8.Glocal Enterprise 9.Sustainable Enterprise
••• 39
2b. The Operational Dimension
The following operational areas are connected in a spiral/fractal fashion
• Invent• Plan• Build• Operate• Manage&Monitor• Dismiss
••• 40
2c. New foundational approaches for Future Enterprises
Governance• Enterprise as a complex artefact• Enterprise Engineering: need for a
systematic approach• A World of Models, based on Design
Science• But... Accepting the limitations of a
modelling approach• Surviving with partial models, to be
addressed with Complexity Theory• E.g., from BPM to Complex Event Proc
••• 41
3. The FInES Space
This is the key knowledge space for the FInES Cluster. It contains the 9 Research Challenges, organised according to the following three dimensions:
1. Knowledge Dimension
2. Functional Dimension,
3. Engineering Dimension
••• 42
1. Enterprise Knowledge Dimension
This knowledge dimension concerns the modeling of the enterprise at conceptual level (Unified Digital Enterprise: UDE), at factual level and their massive interconnection (Linked Open Knowledge), and finally it diachronic modeling (e.g., complex systems modeling)
••• 43
RC2. Linked Open Knowledge
This is an evolution of current Linked Open Data, where there will be a ‘lifting’ of expressive power of both the represented resources, from factual knowledge to semantic knowledge, and the kinds of links adopted.
The semantic links will be adorned with enriched axiomatization, to allow for advanced reasoning and querying
••• 44
FRR MoW• Motivations
• Objectives
• Sustainability
• Content & its Organization
• Governance model
• Actors
• Tools & Functions
••• 45
FRR MoW – Motivations & Objectives
• Go beyond the typical limits of ‘paper’ research roadmaps
• The FRR 2025 is the 4th Resarch Roadmap of this community in a decade
• Guarantee a larger participation and involvement of different communities
• Provide the Commission with a permanent mechanism to understand how the discipline is evolving
••• 46
FRR MoW – M & O (2)• Keep under control the achievements
and advancements, to constantly update the SotA
Practical issues• Create a directory of achievements,
scientific results, tools and methodologies that can be reused
• A shared, open knowledge repository with the FRR content
• Support a constant growth of the FInES Community, avoiding duplications and overlappings ••• 47
FRR MoW – M & O (3)
• Allow all the FInES Community to participate as knowledge provider
• Supporting social wide collaboration in the continuous improvement and update of the FRR
• Hosting different opinions and points of view
• Allowing for different strategies in accesses and navigation, from different users and stakeholders
••• 48
Sustainability• Need of a cohesive community• Create a dedicated teams• Value model (beyond monetary):
– benefits compensate the inflow– Practical advantages, e.g., in proposals
preparation, evaluations, cooperation among projects, ...
• Commission will recognise (endorse?) the value
• Public recognitions... – Public Best Innovator Certificate– Hall of Fame?
••• 49
4. Future Technologies for FInES
ICTs are not our core research interest, but we rely on them to achieve the sought FInES. Key tech:
• Networking• Knowledge• Application• Computation and Storage• Natural interaction
••• 50
Consultation process
• Consultation took place in the second semester of 2011
• Consultation method and tools–Online form–Voting on key issues–Adding text to comment or propose
alternative ideas• Experts consultation
–15 experts, almost 100 contributions• Projects consultation
••• 51
Future Activities• Active participation in the next
FInES Cluster Meetings, in particular:–20 December 2011: pre-final version–February 2012: final (Cluster) version–August 2012: Online version
• Reshape the Editorial Board• Relaunch the FInES RR Task Force• Activate a wide participation process
••• 52
Future Activites (cont’)
• Collaboration with other similar initiatives–ActionPlanT, FISA, EFFRA, ...
• Substantially enlarge the online collaboration method and tools:–Wiki, Folksaurus, Online Forms,
Deliberation tool, but also Word files ...• Online digital version of FInES RR, for
future community sustainability••• 53
Define a strategy
• Sustainability of the Online FInES RR after Ensemble
• Create a Constituency with strong motivation
• Expectations? Advantages? Commitment? ... ?
• Start with a wide consultation (online questionaire) on the above
••• 54
What we Need ?
• Easy to use online tools, for wide social participation
• Strong endorsement of the Commissions
• Role of FInES Project, actively contributing and positioning on the RR
• Adoption of the FInES Glossary in Project Proposals and DoWs
• Adoption of FInES Glossary by Evaluators and Reviewers
••• 55
Conclusions
• An important study of the European Commission
• Community effort of Future Internet Enterprise Systems – FInES Cluster
• Support of DG Information Society & Media, Unit D4
• Open community:– Please contribute going to:
www.fines-cluster.eu••• 56