the food safety almanac 2.0 - edition 2020 · consequences for new version of almanac: 1)...

41
GERMAN FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT Julia Schöne and Majlinda Lahaniatis The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

GE

RM

AN

FE

DE

RA

L I

NS

TIT

UT

E

FO

RR

ISK

AS

SE

SS

ME

NT

Julia Schöne and Majlinda Lahaniatis

The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 -

Edition 2020

Page 2: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 2

Food Safety Almanac 2020 - Fit for purpose?

Up-to-date overview of Food Safety Structures in respective

countries

▪ Comprehensive, but simple

▪ Impactful and complete graphic presentation

▪ Reduce text

▪ Conformity of profile structures and of texts with graphics

Deliverable

▪ Food Safety Almanac in printed form

▪ Wiki‚ World Food Safety Almanac

Important!

▪ Reduce as much as possible resource investement during the

process

What‘s the purpose of this update regarding the

content of Food Safety Almanac?

Page 3: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 3

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Survey on TEAMS

Organigrams

DGEFKE

Child

nutrition

Nutrition

RKI

Health

UBA

Environ-

ment

Nature

JKI MRI

NutritionAnimal Plant

BMG BMUB

BfN

Risk assessment Risk management

National level

Federal state level

FLI

Key questions prior update

▪ More details?

▪ Definition of levels?

▪ Relations between institutions?

▪ Illustration of main roles (RA, RM, RC)

AL

MA

NA

C

Page 4: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

18,5%

33%18,5%

30%

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 4

More organizations working in

the area of food and feed safety

should be illustrated

(5 votes out of 27)

Main roles of organizations

(RA, RM, RC) should be

indicated (9 votes out of 27)

Diagrams shouldn't be

more detailed (8 votes

out of 27)

Different levels of

organizations in the diagram

need to be explained more

clearly (5 votes out of 27)

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Organigrams

Should organigrams be more detailed?

Page 5: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

Consequences for new version of Almanac:

1) Illustration of all main actors and important

Art-36-organizations (described in country profiles)

2) Indication of main roles (RA, RM, RC)

of main actors and important

Art-36-organizations (if possible)

18,5%

33%18,5%

30%

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 5

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Organigrams

Should organigrams be more detailed?

3) Clear explanation for different levels

in organigram will be given

Page 6: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 6

Icons /

Responsibilities?

1. Inclusion of institutions not

included in Art.-36-List?

1. Completeness of

Pictograms illustrating

responsibilities?

1. Fully description of

responsililities in food safety

by pictograms?

2. How much text description is

needed?

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? Responsibilities

Page 7: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 7

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Responsibilities

Should an additional info box / list be added for organizations working in the area of food

and feed safety but don’t belong to Art.-36-List?24%(4)

76%(13)

Yes

No

Consequences for new version of Almanac:

1) No additional box / list will be integrated in country profiles

Page 8: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 8

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Responsibilities

Are existing pictograms that illustrate responsibilities of organizations complete?

„Our proposals are related to EFSA

categories and our national control plan:

Animal health and welfare, Plant health,…

Iwould propose to have a more global term:

‚Biological Hazards‘ instead of ‚Zoonoses‘.“

Page 9: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

Consequences for new version of Almanac:

1. 7 existing pictograms will be maintained

2. 3 of existing pictograms will be renamed

3. Creation of 5 – 8 new pictograms (in progress)

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 9

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Responsibilities

Are existing pictograms that illustrate responsibilities of organizations complete?

53%(8)

47%(7)

Yes

No

Page 10: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 10

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Responsibilities

7 existing pictograms will be maintained 3 existing pictograms will be renamed

Animal Feed

Biological Hazards (and Zoonoses)

Biotechnology (and Genetic Engineering)

Are existing pictograms that illustrate responsibilities of organizations complete?

Page 11: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 11

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Responsibilities

New pictograms to be created for following responsibilities are discussed :

Plant

Health

Food

Contact

Materials &

Packaging

Food

IngredientsNutrition

Animal

Health &

Welfare

Nano-

technologyEmerging

Risks

Environ-

mental

RA

In compliance with

EFSA‘s working areas

Additional proposals

by Member States

Page 12: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 12

1) Main actors in Food and Feed Safety systems in respective country must be…

▪ …illustrated in organigram (blue color)

▪ …described by their main role in organigram (RA, RM, RC in brackets)

▪ …described in a separate box (blue color)

BMEL(RM, RC)

BVL(RM, RC)

BfR(RA, RC)

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles

MRIDGE

Page 13: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

2) Art.-36-Organizations, deeply involved in RA / RM / RC processes in the country

and closely working with the main actors on a frequent basis, must be…

▪ …illustrated in organigram (blue color)

▪ …described by their main role in organigram (RA, RM, RC in brackets) whenever applicable

▪ …described in a separate box (blue color)

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 13

MRI

Max Rubner Institute

http://www.mri.de

BMEL(RM, RC)

BVL(RM, RC)

BfR(RA, RC) MRI

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles

DGE

Page 14: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

DGE

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung

http://www.dge.de

The German Nutrition Society (DGE),

established in 1953, has since been

engaged in topics on nutrition and

nutritional research. From the onset, the

DGE has been a non-profit organization

committed to scientific facts. The DGE is

3) Any other actors…

1) …might be illustrated in organigram in light blue color (not obligatory step)

2) …might be described in a separate box (light blue color) like main actors or

Art.-36-Organizations

1) Attention! If decided to include these actors in organigram it is mandatory to briefly describe

with text in the country profile their full name and responsibilities

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 14

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles

BMEL(RM, RC)

BVL(RM, RC)

BfR(RA, RC)DGE MRI

Page 15: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

4) All organizations must be described

by their acronym in organigram

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 15

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles

BMEL

(RM, RC)

BVL

(RM, RC)

BfR

(RA, RC)DGE MRI

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft

(RM, RC)

BVL

(RM, RC)

BfR

(RA, RC)DGE MRI

5) When relationships between organizations exist,

they must be illustrated in organigram with lines

Page 16: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 16

✓ Possible Reduction of texts?

(Reduce as much as possible resource

investement during the process)

✓ Full description of responsibilities

by pictograms in boxes?

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles

Last Check

✓ All organizations illustrated in organigram are

described in country profiles (see slides 12 – 14)

Page 17: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 17

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles

Definitions

Box

Text

Organigram

Page 18: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 18

Almanac Edition 2020. Current Status Wiki

✓ Creation of new categories in sidebar (e.g. ‘foreword’ and ‘How to read’)

✓ Determination of country administrators and individual editing rights

✓ Filling country profiles with content (including tables, tables of contents, sections and icons)

✓ Editing world map (setting pins, country outlines and links to country profiles)

In process:

I. Reinstallation of demo-version on a new server to make all functions available

II. Creation of organigrams

Page 19: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 19

English country profiles in

Wiki (by BfR+MS)

01/2020

Provision of

Template and

Guideline (by BfR)

02/2020 03/2020

Compilation of

information (by

BfR)

04/2020

Second Review

by MS

05/2020

Order print version of

Almanac (by BfR)

06/2020 10/202007/2020

Translation in local language

ttrough MS administrators

(supported by BfR)

Almanac Edition 2020. Project plan 2019-2020

12/2019

Preparation of Food Safety

structures (MS profile)

Page 20: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

GE

RM

AN

FE

DE

RA

L I

NS

TIT

UT

E

FO

RR

ISK

AS

SE

SS

ME

NT

Thank you for your attention

Julia Schöne and Majlinda Lahaniatis

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10 ⚫ 10589 Berlin, GERMANY

Phone +49 30 - 184 12 - 0 ⚫ Fax +49 30 - 184 12 – 99 0 99

[email protected] ⚫ www.bfr.bund.de/en

Page 21: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 21

Food Safety Almanac Wiki 2020 – State of Play

Feasibility Study + Wiki Demoversion

by IT students of Freie Universität Berlin,

Germany

April 2019 July 20192017

Vision and Objectives

Development of Wiki

Demoversion completed

3rd updated

version

2009

1st version

2nd updated

version

2011

4th updated version

ENP-Almanac

CPLP-Almanac

2014

Page 22: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 22

Main Page

Page 23: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 23

More…

Page 24: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 24

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

Main Page

Page 25: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 25

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

World Map

Page 26: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 26

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

Country Profile - Germany

Page 27: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 27

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

Country Profile - Italy

Page 28: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 28

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

Page 29: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 29

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

Main Page

Page 30: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 30

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view

Glossary

Page 31: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 31

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view (Video)

Page 32: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 32

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – Editor view

Creating a new country profile

Page 33: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 33

Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – Editor view

Translating and Creating Organigrams

Page 34: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 34

Food Safety Almanac 2020 - Fit for purpose?

Up-to-date overview of Food Safety Structures in respective

countries

▪ Comprehensive, but simple

▪ Impactful and complete graphic presentation

▪ Reduce text

▪ Conformity of profile structures and of texts with graphics

Deliverable

▪ Food Safety Almanac in printed form

▪ Wiki‚ World Food Safety Almanac

Important!

▪ Reduce as much as possible resource investement during the

process

What‘s the purpose of this update regarding the

content of Food Safety Almanac?

Page 35: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 35

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? - Organigrams

DGEFKE

Child

nutrition

Nutrition

RKI

Health

UBA

Environ-

ment

Nature

JKI MRI

NutritionAnimal Plant

BMG BMUB

BfN

Risk assessment Risk management

National level

Federal state level

FLI

Key questions prior update

▪ More detailed?

▪ Definition of levels?

▪ Relations between institutions?

▪ Illustration of main roles (RA, RM, RC)

AL

MA

NA

C

Page 36: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 36

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? - Organigrams

Key questions prior update

▪ Conformity with text

desciption in boxes?

Page 37: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 37

Icons /

Responsibilities?

1. Inclusion of institutions not

included in Art.-36-List?

1. Completeness of

Pictograms illustrating

responsibilities?

1. Fully description of

responsililities in food safety

by pictograms?

2. How much text description is

needed?

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? Responsibilities

Page 38: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 38

Project plan 2019-2020

English country profiles in

Wiki (by BfR+MS)

09/2019

Preparation of Food Safety

structures (MS profile)

11/2019 12/2019

Compilation of

information (by

BfR)

01/2020

Second Review

by MS

02/2020

Order print version of

Almanac (by BfR)

03/2020 10/202004/2020

Translation in local language

ttrough MS administrators

(supported by BfR)

Template of country

profile Germany for

orientation?

Page 39: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 39

Dr Nicole Gollnick

Dr Torsten Herold

Thanks to…

Page 40: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

GE

RM

AN

FE

DE

RA

L I

NS

TIT

UT

E

FO

RR

ISK

AS

SE

SS

ME

NT

Thank you for your attention

Julia Schoene

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10 ⚫ 10589 Berlin, GERMANY

Phone +49 30 - 184 12 - 0 ⚫ Fax +49 30 - 184 12 – 99 0 99

[email protected] ⚫ www.bfr.bund.de/en

Page 41: The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1) Illustration of all main actors and important Art-36-organizations (described in country

J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 41

Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS

Check-Box

Conformity between illustration (organigrams)

and description of organizations (boxes / texts)When relationships exist: Illustration of

relations Between organizations in organigrams

UBA?MRI

(Art. 36)

MRI

Max Rubner Institute