the immune defence of fish: studies of atlantic cod (gadus … onamis 2010.pdf · 2011. 9. 1. · 6...
TRANSCRIPT
-
1
The immune defence of fish: Studies of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)
Bergljót Magnadóttir
Tilraunastöð H.Í. Í meinafræði að Keldum
-
2
This talk:
•The evolutionary status and immune system of fish (teleosts/bony fish)
•The immune system and cod: An overview of studies at Keldur
-
3
The innate immune system (non-specific)
450 m.y.
VERTEBRATAINVERTEBRATA
Mammalia
Gnathostomata
Elasmobranchii
Teleosteii
Dipnoi
Reptilia
Aves
Amphibia
Agnatha
Polyfera
Mollusca
Nematoda
Echinoderma
ArthropodaAmphioxus
1000 m.y.
150 m.y.
1 m.y.
The adaptive immune system
(aquired/specific)
-
4
The innate immune system (non-specific)
450 m.y.
VERTEBRATAINVERTEBRATA
Mammalia
Gnathostomata
Elasmobranchii
Teleosteii
Dipnoi
Reptilia
Aves
Amphibia
Agnatha
Polyfera
Mollusca
Nematoda
Echinoderma
ArthropodaAmphioxus
1000 m.y.
150 m.y.
1 m.y.
The adaptive immune system (aquired/specific)
-
5450 m.y.
VERTEBRATAINVERTEBRATA
Mammalia
Gnathostomata
Elasmobranchii
Teleosteii
Dipnoi
Reptilia
Aves
Amphibia
Agnatha
Polyfera
Mollusca
Nematoda
Echinoderma
ArthropodaAmphioxus
1000 m.y.
150 m.y.
1 m.y.
The adaptive immune system (aquired/specific)
Dunkleosteus
The innate immune system (non-specific)
•Improved systemic defence
and homeostatic regulation
•Improved defence against
changable antigens (viral
infections) and complex
antigens (parasitic infections)
•RAG* enzymes
•IgSF**
•T- & B- cell markers
•MHC I & II
•Thymus
*Recombination activating gene
**Immunoglobuin super family
-
6
Fish v. mammals
• The immune system of fish is less sophisticated:• Limitations of the genetic machinery (restricted antibody repertoire)
• Slower metabolic rate (exothermic), fewer & slower leukocytes
• Organization of clonal selection is limited (no lymphnodes or germinal centres), no Ig class switch
• Some differences in the innate and adaptive parameters of fish compared to mammals may to some extent compensate for thesedeficiencies
• Specific antibody response can take weeks (10 – 15) and secondary response is similar to to the primary response
• Fish rely on the innate system in the first line of defence
kidney
spleen
GALT
thymus
IgM (IgD, IgT. . .)
thymus
spleen
lymphnodes
germinal centers bone
marrowGALT
IgM
IgG’s
IgA’s
IgE
IgD
RAG enzymes, IgSF,
B- & T- lymphocytes,
MHC, thymus
E.g. C3 & CRP isotypes,
flexible tetrameric IgM,
phagocytic lymphocytes
-
7
The immune system of fish
• Studies of fish have proved important in comparative and developmental immunology
• The immune response of fish gives a valuable “slow motion” view of the innate response, the activation of the adaptive system and of the communication between the innate and adaptive systems
• Requirements of the fish farming industry are important and the main source of funding
-
8
There is fish – and fish
• Evolutionary status– The different orders of modern teleosts go back 100 – 200 m.a. and
have adapted to varied environments and habitats. Each new species in aquaculture or immunological research demands a fresh start!
• Genetic make-up– The activity of immune parameters can show great individual
variations within the same species
• Age, size, sex
• Maternal effects
• Environmental effects– Temperature, season, water quality, pollution . . .
• Stress – Mating, migrations, captures . . .
– Confinement, density, handling, transport . . . .
• The type of pathogen
Various factors influence the immune system and immune response of fish
-
9
The diminishing stocks of wild cod
0
1
2
3
4
1968 2005
North Atlanticm
illi
on
to
ns
0
100
200
300
400
1981 2008
Icelandic waters
tho
us
an
d t
on
s
Growing interest in cod aquaculture in the
past 15 – 20 years and with it - a growing
interest in the immune system of cod
-
10
The requirements of the cod farming industry
• We need to know more about the immune system of cod at different developmental stages and under different environmental conditions– To secure the optimum activity of the
natural immune defence of cod in aquaculture
– To improve survival of cod larvae culture (the main bottleneck)
– To develop and improve prophylactic measures (vaccination, immunostimulation, probiotics etc.) for larvae and fully grown cod
-
11
The fish and facilities
• Cod at different developmental stages has come from the Marine Institute’s Experimental Station at Staður, Grindavík (+ some wild fish samples)
• Facilities for experiments at Staður are limited to non-infective experiments
• Facilities at Sandgerði for challenge experiments are being improved
• Facilities for keeping fish at Keldur are very limited
– This and the distance from Staður and Sandgerði has restricted the studies we have been able to do
-
12
The immune system of cod: 5 aspects
1. Physical components
2. Cellular components
3. Humoral components
4. Ontogeny
5. The acute phase response
http:/www.hi.is/gadus
-
13
1. Physcical components: The cod mucus
Humoral defence components in cod mucus:
– Relatively rich in antibodies (IgM* 1.5 mg/g mucus)
– Strong enzyme activity (esp. at low temp.)
– Bactericidal effects
– Lectins/pentraxins and lysozyme
Pentraxins Gelatinase activity
lysozyme
* Mucosal IgM
is identical to
serum IgM with
respect to
redox forms
and
glycosylation
-
14
2. Cellular componentsGranuloma formation
• Granuloma formation is very characteristic of cod’s defence against bacterial infection
•Macrophages and epithelioid
cells start to organize around
bacterial colonies
•They form several layers around
the bacteria with a thin
congregation of fibroblast cells
on the periphery
•Granuloma formations are seen
within 3 weeks of experimental
infection
Photographs: Bjarnheiður Guðmundsdóttir
-
15
2. Cellular components*Phagocytic activity (The Amplex Red Assay)
• Phagocytic activity is relatively high in adult cod and shows fast response to stimulation
• Phagocytic activity appears early in ontogeny (< 4 dph)
• Stress and acute phase response supresses phagocytic activity
• Other work on cod leukocytes has mainly been in developing cultural and analytical methods and testing anti-cod antibodies in cell sorting experiments (FACS)
*Sigríður Guðmundsdóttir
-
16
3. Humoral components
• We have measured the following humoral parameters in cod under different conditions and produced mono-specific antibodies against some(*):– IgM* and specific & natural antibody activity
– Haemolytic activity, ApoLP-AI* and C3*
– Lysozyme activity
– Anti-trypsin activity
– Iron binding capacity
– Pentraxins (CRP-PI & CRP-PII)*
-
17
3. Humoral componentsIgM + specific and natural antibody response of cod
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
• Tetrameric IgM is the main immunoglobulin, it has several redox forms
• IgD-like cell receptor has also been described
• Cod has a high serum concentration of IgM (5-20 mg/ml)
• High natural antibody activity (anti-TNP-BSA)
• Shows poor specific antibody response
• Vaccination gives limited protection if any
-
18
I. Cod vaccinated against Aeromonas salmonicida ssp. achromogenes (Asa)* and challenged with Asa 13 weeks later
II. Comparison of the activity and affinity of specific and natural antibodies of cod
*Causes atypical furunculosis in cod
An example of the specific and natural antibody response of cod in a vaccination
trial at Keldur (Sandgerði)
-
19
I. Cod vaccinated against Asa and challenged with Asa
challengevaccination termination*
0 13 w 19 w
Specific antibody response Natural antibody response
Anti-Asa antibodies Anti-TNP-BSA antibodies
* survivors
-
20
II. The activity and affinity of specific and natural antibodies (tested on the same 5 cod sera)
Asa AsaTNP-BSA TNP-BSA
Activity* Affinity**
The affinity – i.e. strength of the antigen-antibody binding
of specific antibodies is weaker than of the natural
antibodies
**thiocyanate elution*ELISA
-
21
4. The ontogenic development of cod
• Samples collected from fertilisation
until 57 days post hatching
• SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of
larvae lysates
• Zymograms of larvae lysates
• Immuno-, in situ- and enzyme-
histology
• Planed: qrtPCR gene expression
analysis of various innate
parameters
The appearance of innate parameters
-
22
Pentraxins
cathepsins
4. The ontogenic development of cod
Complement C3 Phagocytes
-
23
Pentraxins
cathepsins
4. The ontogenic development of cod
Complement C3 Phagocytes
•No maternal transfer of IgM or C3
•Cod is not fully immunologically competent
until 80 – 90 days after hatching
•Need to look for protective methods other than
vaccination for cod larvae & fry during the first
3 months (the main bottleneck in cod aquaculture)
-
24
• What stimulant/probiotic to use?
• How should it be administered?– Bathing, in the feed, injection
• When and how often?– Repeated treatment can be counter
effective
• How do we measure the effects?– The effects on immune parameters,
survival, growth, disease resistance
4. The ontogenic development of cod
Immunostimulation and probiotics
We have tried bathing
cod larvae in LPS from
Asa, in various
polysaccharides from
sea weed, algae, licens
and shellfish,
we have tried bathing in
non-pathogenic bacteria
isolated from cod
(probionts) and
we have tried to
introduce stimulants in
the feed of cod fry.
Variable results and
limited successSee also recent papers by Helen Lauzon, Matís
-
25
5. The acute phase response of cod2 recent experiments at Keldur:
1. Cod infected with Asa
2. Cod injected with turpentine oil
• Samples collected for 6 – 10 days, the effects on cortisol and immune parameters analysed
– Serological analysis of humoral components
– Analysis of RB activity
– Quantitative real time PCR analysis
-
26
5. The acute phase response of cod Serum cortisol
Asa infected cod
Turpentine injected cod
-
27
5. The acute phase response of codSerology and RA activity
Parameter Infected Turpentine
early (1d) late 6d) early (3d) late (7d)
Nat.ab’s
IgM
Anti-tryps.
CRP-PI
CRP-PII
RB activity nd nd
Suppressive effects on humoral immune parameters and RB activity
-
28
Gene expression analysis, turpentine injected fish
Primers Kidney Spleen
early (1h) late (>3d) early (1h) late (>3d)
CRP-PI
CRP-PII
IL-1β
Transferrin
C3
ApoLP-AI
Cathelicidin
5. The acute phase response of cod
Preliminary results but it seems that:
•Cod shows a relatively slow humoral and
cellular response to infection and acute phase
induction
•The increase in serum cortisol may be a key
modulator and
•Pentraxins are not typical acute phase
proteins in cod
Stimulatin effects on the gene expressin esp. in kidney
-
29
Some points about the immune system of cod
• In aquaculture cod (unlike salmon) is known as a stessful fish and a poor responder to vaccination
• Other points about cod:– Vaccination gives variable protection (often limited),
depends on the pathogen and on individual cod– Cod is not particularly susceptible to infectious diseases– There is no deficiency in the number, structure,
organization, diversity or expression of Ig H- or L-chain compared to other teleosts
– Deficient MHC Class II is a prime suspect as well as possible deficiency in cytokine activity
• Is cod a primitive fish?
-
30
Gnathostomata
Chondrichthyes
Actinopterygii
Teleostei
coelacanths
sturgeon
sharks
codlantern fish salmonids
carp eel
Cartilaginous fishes
The evolutionary status of cod
Cod may have taken a
different line in immune
defence from other teleost
species
-
31
Physically strong and
immunologically
active mucus
High, relatively constant
level of humoral
innate parameters
High level of natural
antibodies with relatively
strong affinity
Active phagocytes/macrophages
and epithelial cells quickly form
granuloma around the pathogen
Great heterogeneity
of some PRP like
the pentraxins
The immune defence of cod
-
32
What are we working on now?
• SALCOD: The effects of variable salinity during larval stages on immune parameters of cod (The Marine Institute)
• The gene expression and IH analysis of pentraxins and IL-1β in cod larvae (qrtPCR)
-
33
Co-Workers
The “fish” group at Keldur
Agnar Steinarsson,
Marine Institute
Sigríður Guðmundsdóttir
Sigurður Helgason
Bjarnheiður Guðmundsdóttir
Sigríður Steinunn Auðunsdóttir
Eggert Gunnarsson o.fl. á Keldum
Agnar Steinarsson o.fl. á Stað
-
34
Tank you – takk!