the immune defence of fish: studies of atlantic cod (gadus … onamis 2010.pdf · 2011. 9. 1. · 6...

34
1 The immune defence of fish: Studies of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) Bergljót Magnadóttir Tilraunastöð H.Í. Í meinafræði að Keldum

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    The immune defence of fish: Studies of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)

    Bergljót Magnadóttir

    Tilraunastöð H.Í. Í meinafræði að Keldum

  • 2

    This talk:

    •The evolutionary status and immune system of fish (teleosts/bony fish)

    •The immune system and cod: An overview of studies at Keldur

  • 3

    The innate immune system (non-specific)

    450 m.y.

    VERTEBRATAINVERTEBRATA

    Mammalia

    Gnathostomata

    Elasmobranchii

    Teleosteii

    Dipnoi

    Reptilia

    Aves

    Amphibia

    Agnatha

    Polyfera

    Mollusca

    Nematoda

    Echinoderma

    ArthropodaAmphioxus

    1000 m.y.

    150 m.y.

    1 m.y.

    The adaptive immune system

    (aquired/specific)

  • 4

    The innate immune system (non-specific)

    450 m.y.

    VERTEBRATAINVERTEBRATA

    Mammalia

    Gnathostomata

    Elasmobranchii

    Teleosteii

    Dipnoi

    Reptilia

    Aves

    Amphibia

    Agnatha

    Polyfera

    Mollusca

    Nematoda

    Echinoderma

    ArthropodaAmphioxus

    1000 m.y.

    150 m.y.

    1 m.y.

    The adaptive immune system (aquired/specific)

  • 5450 m.y.

    VERTEBRATAINVERTEBRATA

    Mammalia

    Gnathostomata

    Elasmobranchii

    Teleosteii

    Dipnoi

    Reptilia

    Aves

    Amphibia

    Agnatha

    Polyfera

    Mollusca

    Nematoda

    Echinoderma

    ArthropodaAmphioxus

    1000 m.y.

    150 m.y.

    1 m.y.

    The adaptive immune system (aquired/specific)

    Dunkleosteus

    The innate immune system (non-specific)

    •Improved systemic defence

    and homeostatic regulation

    •Improved defence against

    changable antigens (viral

    infections) and complex

    antigens (parasitic infections)

    •RAG* enzymes

    •IgSF**

    •T- & B- cell markers

    •MHC I & II

    •Thymus

    *Recombination activating gene

    **Immunoglobuin super family

  • 6

    Fish v. mammals

    • The immune system of fish is less sophisticated:• Limitations of the genetic machinery (restricted antibody repertoire)

    • Slower metabolic rate (exothermic), fewer & slower leukocytes

    • Organization of clonal selection is limited (no lymphnodes or germinal centres), no Ig class switch

    • Some differences in the innate and adaptive parameters of fish compared to mammals may to some extent compensate for thesedeficiencies

    • Specific antibody response can take weeks (10 – 15) and secondary response is similar to to the primary response

    • Fish rely on the innate system in the first line of defence

    kidney

    spleen

    GALT

    thymus

    IgM (IgD, IgT. . .)

    thymus

    spleen

    lymphnodes

    germinal centers bone

    marrowGALT

    IgM

    IgG’s

    IgA’s

    IgE

    IgD

    RAG enzymes, IgSF,

    B- & T- lymphocytes,

    MHC, thymus

    E.g. C3 & CRP isotypes,

    flexible tetrameric IgM,

    phagocytic lymphocytes

  • 7

    The immune system of fish

    • Studies of fish have proved important in comparative and developmental immunology

    • The immune response of fish gives a valuable “slow motion” view of the innate response, the activation of the adaptive system and of the communication between the innate and adaptive systems

    • Requirements of the fish farming industry are important and the main source of funding

  • 8

    There is fish – and fish

    • Evolutionary status– The different orders of modern teleosts go back 100 – 200 m.a. and

    have adapted to varied environments and habitats. Each new species in aquaculture or immunological research demands a fresh start!

    • Genetic make-up– The activity of immune parameters can show great individual

    variations within the same species

    • Age, size, sex

    • Maternal effects

    • Environmental effects– Temperature, season, water quality, pollution . . .

    • Stress – Mating, migrations, captures . . .

    – Confinement, density, handling, transport . . . .

    • The type of pathogen

    Various factors influence the immune system and immune response of fish

  • 9

    The diminishing stocks of wild cod

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    1968 2005

    North Atlanticm

    illi

    on

    to

    ns

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    1981 2008

    Icelandic waters

    tho

    us

    an

    d t

    on

    s

    Growing interest in cod aquaculture in the

    past 15 – 20 years and with it - a growing

    interest in the immune system of cod

  • 10

    The requirements of the cod farming industry

    • We need to know more about the immune system of cod at different developmental stages and under different environmental conditions– To secure the optimum activity of the

    natural immune defence of cod in aquaculture

    – To improve survival of cod larvae culture (the main bottleneck)

    – To develop and improve prophylactic measures (vaccination, immunostimulation, probiotics etc.) for larvae and fully grown cod

  • 11

    The fish and facilities

    • Cod at different developmental stages has come from the Marine Institute’s Experimental Station at Staður, Grindavík (+ some wild fish samples)

    • Facilities for experiments at Staður are limited to non-infective experiments

    • Facilities at Sandgerði for challenge experiments are being improved

    • Facilities for keeping fish at Keldur are very limited

    – This and the distance from Staður and Sandgerði has restricted the studies we have been able to do

  • 12

    The immune system of cod: 5 aspects

    1. Physical components

    2. Cellular components

    3. Humoral components

    4. Ontogeny

    5. The acute phase response

    http:/www.hi.is/gadus

  • 13

    1. Physcical components: The cod mucus

    Humoral defence components in cod mucus:

    – Relatively rich in antibodies (IgM* 1.5 mg/g mucus)

    – Strong enzyme activity (esp. at low temp.)

    – Bactericidal effects

    – Lectins/pentraxins and lysozyme

    Pentraxins Gelatinase activity

    lysozyme

    * Mucosal IgM

    is identical to

    serum IgM with

    respect to

    redox forms

    and

    glycosylation

  • 14

    2. Cellular componentsGranuloma formation

    • Granuloma formation is very characteristic of cod’s defence against bacterial infection

    •Macrophages and epithelioid

    cells start to organize around

    bacterial colonies

    •They form several layers around

    the bacteria with a thin

    congregation of fibroblast cells

    on the periphery

    •Granuloma formations are seen

    within 3 weeks of experimental

    infection

    Photographs: Bjarnheiður Guðmundsdóttir

  • 15

    2. Cellular components*Phagocytic activity (The Amplex Red Assay)

    • Phagocytic activity is relatively high in adult cod and shows fast response to stimulation

    • Phagocytic activity appears early in ontogeny (< 4 dph)

    • Stress and acute phase response supresses phagocytic activity

    • Other work on cod leukocytes has mainly been in developing cultural and analytical methods and testing anti-cod antibodies in cell sorting experiments (FACS)

    *Sigríður Guðmundsdóttir

  • 16

    3. Humoral components

    • We have measured the following humoral parameters in cod under different conditions and produced mono-specific antibodies against some(*):– IgM* and specific & natural antibody activity

    – Haemolytic activity, ApoLP-AI* and C3*

    – Lysozyme activity

    – Anti-trypsin activity

    – Iron binding capacity

    – Pentraxins (CRP-PI & CRP-PII)*

  • 17

    3. Humoral componentsIgM + specific and natural antibody response of cod

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    • Tetrameric IgM is the main immunoglobulin, it has several redox forms

    • IgD-like cell receptor has also been described

    • Cod has a high serum concentration of IgM (5-20 mg/ml)

    • High natural antibody activity (anti-TNP-BSA)

    • Shows poor specific antibody response

    • Vaccination gives limited protection if any

  • 18

    I. Cod vaccinated against Aeromonas salmonicida ssp. achromogenes (Asa)* and challenged with Asa 13 weeks later

    II. Comparison of the activity and affinity of specific and natural antibodies of cod

    *Causes atypical furunculosis in cod

    An example of the specific and natural antibody response of cod in a vaccination

    trial at Keldur (Sandgerði)

  • 19

    I. Cod vaccinated against Asa and challenged with Asa

    challengevaccination termination*

    0 13 w 19 w

    Specific antibody response Natural antibody response

    Anti-Asa antibodies Anti-TNP-BSA antibodies

    * survivors

  • 20

    II. The activity and affinity of specific and natural antibodies (tested on the same 5 cod sera)

    Asa AsaTNP-BSA TNP-BSA

    Activity* Affinity**

    The affinity – i.e. strength of the antigen-antibody binding

    of specific antibodies is weaker than of the natural

    antibodies

    **thiocyanate elution*ELISA

  • 21

    4. The ontogenic development of cod

    • Samples collected from fertilisation

    until 57 days post hatching

    • SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of

    larvae lysates

    • Zymograms of larvae lysates

    • Immuno-, in situ- and enzyme-

    histology

    • Planed: qrtPCR gene expression

    analysis of various innate

    parameters

    The appearance of innate parameters

  • 22

    Pentraxins

    cathepsins

    4. The ontogenic development of cod

    Complement C3 Phagocytes

  • 23

    Pentraxins

    cathepsins

    4. The ontogenic development of cod

    Complement C3 Phagocytes

    •No maternal transfer of IgM or C3

    •Cod is not fully immunologically competent

    until 80 – 90 days after hatching

    •Need to look for protective methods other than

    vaccination for cod larvae & fry during the first

    3 months (the main bottleneck in cod aquaculture)

  • 24

    • What stimulant/probiotic to use?

    • How should it be administered?– Bathing, in the feed, injection

    • When and how often?– Repeated treatment can be counter

    effective

    • How do we measure the effects?– The effects on immune parameters,

    survival, growth, disease resistance

    4. The ontogenic development of cod

    Immunostimulation and probiotics

    We have tried bathing

    cod larvae in LPS from

    Asa, in various

    polysaccharides from

    sea weed, algae, licens

    and shellfish,

    we have tried bathing in

    non-pathogenic bacteria

    isolated from cod

    (probionts) and

    we have tried to

    introduce stimulants in

    the feed of cod fry.

    Variable results and

    limited successSee also recent papers by Helen Lauzon, Matís

  • 25

    5. The acute phase response of cod2 recent experiments at Keldur:

    1. Cod infected with Asa

    2. Cod injected with turpentine oil

    • Samples collected for 6 – 10 days, the effects on cortisol and immune parameters analysed

    – Serological analysis of humoral components

    – Analysis of RB activity

    – Quantitative real time PCR analysis

  • 26

    5. The acute phase response of cod Serum cortisol

    Asa infected cod

    Turpentine injected cod

  • 27

    5. The acute phase response of codSerology and RA activity

    Parameter Infected Turpentine

    early (1d) late 6d) early (3d) late (7d)

    Nat.ab’s

    IgM

    Anti-tryps.

    CRP-PI

    CRP-PII

    RB activity nd nd

    Suppressive effects on humoral immune parameters and RB activity

  • 28

    Gene expression analysis, turpentine injected fish

    Primers Kidney Spleen

    early (1h) late (>3d) early (1h) late (>3d)

    CRP-PI

    CRP-PII

    IL-1β

    Transferrin

    C3

    ApoLP-AI

    Cathelicidin

    5. The acute phase response of cod

    Preliminary results but it seems that:

    •Cod shows a relatively slow humoral and

    cellular response to infection and acute phase

    induction

    •The increase in serum cortisol may be a key

    modulator and

    •Pentraxins are not typical acute phase

    proteins in cod

    Stimulatin effects on the gene expressin esp. in kidney

  • 29

    Some points about the immune system of cod

    • In aquaculture cod (unlike salmon) is known as a stessful fish and a poor responder to vaccination

    • Other points about cod:– Vaccination gives variable protection (often limited),

    depends on the pathogen and on individual cod– Cod is not particularly susceptible to infectious diseases– There is no deficiency in the number, structure,

    organization, diversity or expression of Ig H- or L-chain compared to other teleosts

    – Deficient MHC Class II is a prime suspect as well as possible deficiency in cytokine activity

    • Is cod a primitive fish?

  • 30

    Gnathostomata

    Chondrichthyes

    Actinopterygii

    Teleostei

    coelacanths

    sturgeon

    sharks

    codlantern fish salmonids

    carp eel

    Cartilaginous fishes

    The evolutionary status of cod

    Cod may have taken a

    different line in immune

    defence from other teleost

    species

  • 31

    Physically strong and

    immunologically

    active mucus

    High, relatively constant

    level of humoral

    innate parameters

    High level of natural

    antibodies with relatively

    strong affinity

    Active phagocytes/macrophages

    and epithelial cells quickly form

    granuloma around the pathogen

    Great heterogeneity

    of some PRP like

    the pentraxins

    The immune defence of cod

  • 32

    What are we working on now?

    • SALCOD: The effects of variable salinity during larval stages on immune parameters of cod (The Marine Institute)

    • The gene expression and IH analysis of pentraxins and IL-1β in cod larvae (qrtPCR)

  • 33

    Co-Workers

    The “fish” group at Keldur

    Agnar Steinarsson,

    Marine Institute

    Sigríður Guðmundsdóttir

    Sigurður Helgason

    Bjarnheiður Guðmundsdóttir

    Sigríður Steinunn Auðunsdóttir

    Eggert Gunnarsson o.fl. á Keldum

    Agnar Steinarsson o.fl. á Stað

  • 34

    Tank you – takk!