the implementation process1 / 8npsr, december 8, 2015 revising the implementation process looking...

Download The Implementation Process1 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Revising the Implementation Process Looking Forward, setting the stage for the panel discussion Hendrik

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: ilene-taylor

Post on 18-Jan-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Implementation Process3 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 The old (present) process 3 EMC Change Control Board Scientific Integrity Product Quality EMC Mgmt Approval Implementation Phase SPA’s build NCO parallel from RFC’s 30-day NCO parallel  Test code stability  Test dataflow  Products to NCEP Centers and EMC code developers NCEP Centers  Evaluate impact  Assessments to NCEP OD R&D and Pre-Implementation Phase 30-day NCO parallel stable NCEP centers approve Briefing to NCEP Director for final approval Implementation Generate RFC’s Submit RFC’s to NCO

TRANSCRIPT

The Implementation Process1 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Revising the Implementation Process Looking Forward, setting the stage for the panel discussion Hendrik L. Tolman Director, The Environmental Modeling Center NOAA / NWS / NCEP The Implementation Process2 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Outline Background The old way of doing business Looking forward Food for thought? CaRDS The Implementation Process3 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 The old (present) process 3 EMC Change Control Board Scientific Integrity Product Quality EMC Mgmt Approval Implementation Phase SPAs build NCO parallel from RFCs 30-day NCO parallel Test code stability Test dataflow Products to NCEP Centers and EMC code developers NCEP Centers Evaluate impact Assessments to NCEP OD R&D and Pre-Implementation Phase 30-day NCO parallel stable NCEP centers approve Briefing to NCEP Director for final approval Implementation Generate RFCs Submit RFCs to NCO The Implementation Process4 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Requirements definition Identified as a weakness by NCEP stakeholders and UMAC incomplete requirements may create false expectations NWS needs an improved processis portfolio management the answer? Stakeholder input Stakeholders--- need earlier access to information What changes are being made? Whats the rational? What characteristics of the tool will change? Stakeholder calibration methods need time and access to pre- implementation data in order to adapt (i.e., GEFS FY15 Upgrade) 30-day NCO parallel insufficient for customer assessment IMPROVE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MODEL DEVELOPERS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Implementation Process5 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Process suggested recently to AA 5 Start of Development Cycle Conduct a workshop (modelers, field, academia, customers) Prioritize features to be improved How do you propose to improve them? How much will it cost (time=$, HPC) How will data be disseminated? Develop detailed test plan Create end-to-end charter Get appropriate approval to proceed Phase 1 of test plan (2-4 months) Assessment of Phase 1 results (2 weeks) Invite SOOs to participate Phase 2 of test plan (2-4 months) Assessment of Phase 2 results (2 weeks) Invite SOOs to participate Test Assess NCO Testing & Implementation Final Approval MEG !? The Implementation Process6 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Process in time lines . Planning workshop Science testing of parts Selection of ready upgrades Run retrospectives (R/R) Science evaluation Implementation decision Downstream adjustments Hand off to NCO 30 day IT test Implementation Decision point / gate Work with partners the funnel Food for thought 1) Fixed schedule and skipping your slot 2) dealing with downstream 3) RR strategy The Implementation Process7 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015 Past present - future Past: This is following the established HWRF implementation process Fixed schedule, stringent project management. Last SREF implementation started with user defined scope. Present: New GFS implementation decision will be made several weeks after retrospectives are done, WELL BEFORE NCO parallel. Starting off GEFS v12 with workshop to determine scope. Future: Start with users, end with users. Project management per system, and for all suite. Stick to your schedule, or skip implementation . The Implementation Process8 / 8NPSR, December 8, 2015