the last resort ideas for an industry funded race horse retirement system dorothée ostle jon...
TRANSCRIPT
The Last Resort
Ideas for an Industry Funded Race Horse Retirement System
Dorothée Ostle
Jon Hansen
December 2004
When the Race is All Over
Breeding - for some stallions and mares Retraining - for some Adoption - for some And “the rest”??? About 3,000 TB in need[1]
[1] Estimate from Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation
What’s Happening to “The Rest”?
Anything from adoption to slaughter Whatever option owner happens to know and care
about Breed registries maintain lists of endorsed
(private-initiative) retirement, retraining and adoption organizations
But information not always readily available
Current System Structurally Unsound When their racing career ends, 3000 TB per year (13.4%)
are in need because stakeholders negligent of moral and financial responsibility
Dependent on private initiative of horse lovers to address the problem and account for the ones in need
Dependent on donations from horse lovers About 20 years ago, various retirement, retraining and adoption
organizations were started Almost entirely run by volunteers, funded by donations Some of them endorsed, but not financed, by breed registries
Current System Financially Unsound Individuals from inside and outside this industry
give generously to support the second careers of many ex-race horses.
Their donations are greatly appreciated and will always be needed. Unfortunately, they don’t meet the needs for caring for all the horses in need.
It is high noon for the industry to assume responsibility and fill the financial needs.
Consequences
Industry is increasingly vulnerable to animal welfare issues
Industry is perceived as irresponsible Industry is not in control of what is happening Industry is missing an important chance for image
improvement
Public Concern is Rising
Outcry of “Ferdinand” and others Recent rally “Remember Ferdinand” by the
National Horse Protection Coalition at the Breeders’ Cup World Championships at Lone Star Park
The Greyhound Example
Accountability – from first to last bark Systematic, controlled and well-organized
adoption program implemented – after public pressure from Animal Rights groups
The EU Car Example EU imposed an “old car disposal fee” on manufacturers
for each new car sold – against the fierce resistance from the industry
Every car accounted for from assembly to disassembly Permanent de-registration requires proof of lawful
disposal New business opportunities – certified car recycling
companies thriving
The Arizona Example State Legislature passed a 5% surcharge on all fines levied
by the ADOR Arizona estimates between $2000 and $3000 collectable Nationally this would provide up to $50,932 Arizona Owners volunteered a $1 per start[1]
Nationally, from 489,503 starts in 2003, this would contribute $489,503
[1] Source: Arizona HBPA , all but two owners volunteered [2] Source: The Jockey Club, 2004 Fact Book
Our suggestions go even further than AZ...
The whole industry, nationwide, should take responsibility for the ex-racehorses in need
Every part of the industry should contribute its financial share to the funding
… and result in an Industry-funded Racehorse Retirement System
With more second career options for QH & SB racehorse retirees, this idea will be explained in detail for the TB
It can be immediately applied to the QH and SB racehorse breeds
Racing Industry - Shared Responsibility from Foaling to Retirement
All enjoy the efforts of this grand animal, it’s time to give back:
Breeders – Sire fee, Registration fee Owners – Tattoo fee, Start fee, Claiming fee, Win
participation Other Stakeholders – Fine surcharge Bettors/Racetracks – Uncashed tickets, Price/Takeout
increase Racino – Contribution
Legal Framework Pro-active (like AZ):
Initiate legislative/regulatory action Industry-wide commitment to common goals and
strategies to achieve these goalsOR
Reactive (like Greyhounds):
Imposed legislative/regulatory action Influential pressure groups outside racing industry
Need for Addressing this Issue
Approximately 34,000 TB (compared to 11,000 SB & 150,000 QH) [1] were foaled in each of the last four years
Of those TB registered with the Jockey Club about 66% make it to the racetrack
Of those retiring from the racetracks an estimated 3000 TBs (13.4%) are in need per year [2]
[1] Source: Individual Breed Registries from The Jockey Club online Fact Book
[2] Estimate from Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation
Costs for Caring for a Retiree [1]
$5 to $8 / day for a sound horse on good pasture $10-12 / day for a horse in need of vet care 3000 per year—assume 30% in need of vet care 2100 x $6.50 x 365 = $4,982,250 900 x $11 x 365 = $3,613,500 Total estimated $$ needed for 3000 Thoroughbreds = $ 8,595,750 / year
[1] Source: Estimates from The Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation
The Breeders
A $50 Sire Fee for each mare bred could be paid to the fund
With approximately 50,000 mares bred per year this would result in $ 2,500,000
The Breeders (cont.)
$ 40 additional registration fee Approximately 34,000 TB foals a year x $40 =
$1,360,000
The Owners
A $30 additional Tattoo FeeAround 11,000 horses make it to the track as
2year olds per year = $330,000Tattoo also proof of eligibility for future
benefits for horse
The Owners (cont.)
A $25 fee for Claims Estimated rate of .2593 claims per race In 2003, 53,503 races x .2593 = 13,873 claims x $25 = $346,825 Win participation of 0.5% Using 55% as the nationwide average of purse money that
goes to the winner, and 2003 gross purses $1,055,496,849, the 0.5% contribution to the fund would be = $2,902,616
Other Stakeholders
Trainers, jockeys, etc…5% surcharge on all fines levied by the
respective Racing CommissionNationwide, this would amount to
approximately $ 50,932
The Bettors
Uncashed tickets: “Outs” could become “Ins” for the fund
We realize that moneys from uncashed tickets are already allocated in most jurisdictions, how about 2% for the horses? This would contribute
$570,239 to the fund.
The Bettors (cont.)
We realize that bettors have become increasingly price sensitive[1]
However, we are convinced that a 0.2% rise in takeout nationwide would have no significant effect on handle, which is currently $15,180,000,000
Using a 20% blended takeout, the 0.2% rise would contribute $6,072,000 to the fund
[1] “The NYRA takeout cut…proved that bettors – even those who don’t bet tens of millions of dollars a year – are price sensitive”. LaMarra, Tom, “Pricing Wars”, The Blood-Horse, 6 March, 2004, pg 1416, Quote by Bill Nader.
Racetracks
Instead of rising the takeout, the 0.2% contribution to the fund could also come from the racetracks
Or bettors on one hand and racetracks on the other hand could share the contribution and each pay 0.1% to the fund
Unchanged amount = $ 6,072,000
Racino Contribution
In 2003, racinos in Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, New Mexico, West Virginia generated $1.8 billion
Contribution of 0.25% would result in $4,670,250 When other jurisdictions legalize racinos even
more money would be available
Summary of Revenues Sire fees----------------------------$ 2,857,100 Registration fees------------------$ 1,360,000 $30 Tattoo fee---------------------$ 330,000 .50% Win --------------------------$ 2,902,616 $25 per Claim----------------------$ 346,825 $1 per Start-------------------------$ 489,503 5% Fine Surcharge----------------$ 50,932 2% Uncashed Tickets-------------$ 570,239 .2% of Takeout--------------------$ 6,072,000 Racino contribution---------------$ 4,670,250 Total revenues---------------------$19,649,465
Summary of Expenses Equine related cost (one year/3000 horses)
Non-vet care 70% of horses $4,982,250 Vet care 30% of horses $3,613,500
Total equine cost $8,595,750 Overhead cost 15% $1,289,362
Including marketing cost for second career horses Total expenses $9,885,112 Minus revenues sold/adopted horses $1,477,500
Total Expenses $8,407,612
5-Year Business Plan Sound only if racinos and bettors/racetracks contribute Sound for 6 years if program allows for rearward
eligibility Sound for around 12 years if first two years used for
accumulation of capital and no rearward eligibility Problem is the accumulation of horses, mainly “pasture
ornaments” and those in need of vet care In Year 6 the total cost will reach around
$30 million!!!
What about the Private Retirement Organizations?
They are an integral part of the idea Utilize their up-and-running facilities for
rehabilitation, retraining, and retirement Utilize their established network for sales and
adoption Payments from the fund will improve their
financial situation and provide a steady source of basic funding
Can we do without donations? No, especially if contributions from racinos and
bettors/racetracks are not available Donations will always have to be an integral part of the
funding structure: If program offers rearward eligibility, industry fund will
only be able to complement, not replace donations Even if program does not offer rearward eligibility,
industry funding will not be sufficient after around 12 years, unless contributions would increase substantially
Can we generate more donations?
From the bettors – maybe they will donate if we encourage them
Provide links to racehorse retirement information and to donations
On every ADW web site On every track web site
Business Opportunities - like EU Car Disassembly
A new agribusiness industry with jobs for “soured” stakeholders
Job creation as people are needed to re-train the horses and care for them
Second careers for trainers, grooms, pros and amateurs of show disciplines,…
Industry funding will secure quality life for both the animal ex-athletes and their caretakers
How could the idea work in practice? Eligibility of Horses
Only racehorses would be eligible – tattoo as proof of eligibility
All breeder fees for horse must have been paid Payment of all other fees related to horse (claiming fee,
win contribution etc) to be recorded on foal papers and/or in database
The industry’s retirement agency (to be created) would be responsible for distribution of the funds depending on the individual needs of the horses
How could it work in practice? Admission Procedure
Not mandatory for all horses retired from the racetrack Option for only the needy horses retired from the
racetrack, whose owners have no other use for them Owner signs eligible horse over to industry retirement
agency Accountability for all horses through exit papers from
racetracks – require destination declaration
How could it work in practice? Organizational Structure
Industry retirement agency would implement regional/local offices utilizing existing networks, for example track vet, HBPA
Track vet at regional office would classify signed over horses depending on their second career potential
Regional office would utilize the existing, already endorsed (private-initiative) retirement organizations for placement of horses accordingly and
Try to expand list and certify all endorsed organizations for special tasks – rehabilitation, discipline-specific retraining, adoption, pasture-retirement
How could it work in practice? Financial Structure
Endorsed and certified organizations would be compensated for each horse in accordance with their service provided
Retrained horses could be advertised, presented and sold, the profit (sale price minus sales expenses) is part of the calculated revenue for the fund
Conclusion
This idea is do-able – if all parts of the industry are willing to assume their collective responsibility
Arizona is a first step in the right direction
All positions allow adjustments, however, balance of contribution from each group essential
Act - rather than be forced to react