the mixed system: how did primaries change the presidential nomination process?
DESCRIPTION
The Mixed System: How did primaries change the presidential nomination process?. Methods of Nominating Presidential Candidates. “King Caucus”: 1800-1828 Convention System: 1832-1912. The Convention System. National party nominating convention selects presidential candidate Strong parties - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Mixed System: The Mixed System: How did primaries How did primaries change the presidential change the presidential nomination process?nomination process?
Methods of Nominating Methods of Nominating Presidential CandidatesPresidential Candidates
““King Caucus”: 1800-1828King Caucus”: 1800-1828
Convention System: 1832-1912Convention System: 1832-1912
The Convention The Convention SystemSystem National party nominating National party nominating
convention selects presidential convention selects presidential candidatecandidate
Strong partiesStrong parties PatronagePatronage High participationHigh participation Parties try to control presidentsParties try to control presidents
Three changes at the Three changes at the turn of the 20turn of the 20thth centurycentury
Civil ServiceCivil Service
Rise In Civil Service Rise In Civil Service EmploymentEmployment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1816 1831 1851 1871 1891 1911 1931 1951 1971 1991
Percentage of employees under merit
Number of federal Number of federal employees under merit employees under merit
system,system, 1816-19211816-1921
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
1816 1821 1831 1841 1851 1861 1871 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921
Number of employees Number of civil servants
Three changes at the Three changes at the turn of the 20turn of the 20thth centurycentury
Civil ServiceCivil Service
Communications technologyCommunications technology
Changes in technologyChanges in technology
Railroads (1850s +)Railroads (1850s +)
Daily newspapers (1880s +)Daily newspapers (1880s +)
Radio and TV (1930s +)Radio and TV (1930s +)
Number of daily and Number of daily and weekly newspapersweekly newspapers
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990
Number of daily newspapers Number of weeklies
Number of Households with Number of Households with radio and TV (in millions)radio and TV (in millions)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
Households with radio Households with TV
Three changes at the Three changes at the turn of the 20turn of the 20thth centurycentury
Civil ServiceCivil Service
Communications technologyCommunications technology
Primary electionsPrimary elections
Number of States Number of States Holding Primary Holding Primary ElectionsElections
02
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1912 1920 1928 1936 1944 1952 1960 1968
Democrats Republicans
First Three Methods of First Three Methods of Nominating Presidential Nominating Presidential CandidatesCandidates
““King Caucus”: 1800-1828King Caucus”: 1800-1828
Convention System: 1832-1912Convention System: 1832-1912
Mixed System: 1912-1968Mixed System: 1912-1968
Mixed SystemMixed System
Real decision about nomination Real decision about nomination made at national conventionmade at national convention
Candidates Candidates cancan choose to run in choose to run in primariesprimaries
Percent of Party Percent of Party Convention Delegates Convention Delegates Chosen by PrimariesChosen by Primaries
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1912 1920 1928 1936 1944 1952 1960 1968
Democrats Republicans
Number of Convention Number of Convention Ballots to Select Ballots to Select Presidential NomineePresidential Nominee
05
10
15
20
2530
35
40
45
50
1832 1840 1848 1856 1864 1872 1880 1888 1896
Republican Democratic
Number of Convention Number of Convention Ballots to Select the Ballots to Select the Presidential NomineePresidential Nominee
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1912 1920 1928 1936 1944 1952 1960 1968
Democrats Republicans
1952 Democratic 1952 Democratic Convention: Delegates Convention: Delegates pledged by primariespledged by primaries
Sen. Estes Kefauver (TN): 257.5 Sen. Estes Kefauver (TN): 257.5 delegatesdelegates
Gov. Adlai Stevenson (IL): 41.5 Gov. Adlai Stevenson (IL): 41.5 delegatesdelegates
Uncommitted: 611.5 delegatesUncommitted: 611.5 delegates
Others: Others: – Sen. Richard Russell (GA): 161.5 delegatesSen. Richard Russell (GA): 161.5 delegates– Averell Harriman: 112.5 delegatesAverell Harriman: 112.5 delegates– Sen. Bob Kerr (OK): 45.5 delegatesSen. Bob Kerr (OK): 45.5 delegates
Review the three systems we’ve Review the three systems we’ve discussed.discussed.
Which do you think is most Which do you think is most democratic? democratic?
Which has the best chance of Which has the best chance of producing good presidents?producing good presidents?
1968 Democratic 1968 Democratic ConventionConvention
The Primary SystemThe Primary System
Presidential Presidential Party Nomination Party Nomination SystemsSystems
““King Caucus”: 1800-1828King Caucus”: 1800-1828
Convention System: 1832-1912Convention System: 1832-1912
Mixed System: 1912-1968Mixed System: 1912-1968
Primary System: 1972-???Primary System: 1972-???
McGovern Fraser McGovern Fraser Commission: Commission: Changes to Changes to
Democratic Party RulesDemocratic Party Rules Anti-discrimination provisionsAnti-discrimination provisions Explicit party rules and open party meetingsExplicit party rules and open party meetings Bans the UNIT RULEBans the UNIT RULE
– Unit rule: the practice of apportioning Unit rule: the practice of apportioning delegates in a winner-take-all fashiondelegates in a winner-take-all fashion
Encourages broad and open participation in Encourages broad and open participation in delegate selection processdelegate selection process
Mandates that minorities’ opinions be fairly Mandates that minorities’ opinions be fairly weighted in delegate selection processweighted in delegate selection process
Bans the automatic delegate-status of party Bans the automatic delegate-status of party officials and elected officeholdersofficials and elected officeholders
Number of states Number of states holding holding primary electionsprimary elections
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
4045
1912 1920 1928 1936 1944 1952 1960 1968 1976 1984 1992 2000
Democrats Republicans
Percent of Party Percent of Party Convention Delegates Convention Delegates Chosen by PrimariesChosen by Primaries
010203040
5060708090
1912 1920 1928 1936 1944 1952 1960 1968 1976 1984 1992 2000
Democrats Republicans
Some delegates still Some delegates still chosen by other meanschosen by other means Caucus:Caucus:
– A Meeting where any affiliated voter A Meeting where any affiliated voter can come and express their opinionscan come and express their opinions
State convention:State convention:– Local party groups select delegates to Local party groups select delegates to
state party convention. State state party convention. State convention delegates select convention delegates select delegates to national nominating delegates to national nominating convention.convention.
Consequences of Party Consequences of Party ReformReform Increase in number of primariesIncrease in number of primaries Increase in importance of mediaIncrease in importance of media
– (And hence the importance of early (And hence the importance of early primaries!)primaries!)
Consequences of Party Consequences of Party ReformReform Increase in number of primariesIncrease in number of primaries Increase in importance of mediaIncrease in importance of media Increase in importance of early Increase in importance of early
primaries (and momentum and primaries (and momentum and expectations!)expectations!)
A representative A representative beginning?beginning?From the 2000 CensusFrom the 2000 Census
IowaIowa New New HampshirHampshir
ee
National National averageaverage
PopulatioPopulationn
2,929,3242,929,324
(30(30thth))1,235,7861,235,786
(41(41stst))281,421,90281,421,90
66
% White% White 93.9%93.9% 96%96% 75.1%75.1%
Median Median incomeincome
$39,469$39,469 $49,467$49,467 $41,994$41,994
% Farm % Farm employmemploymtt
4.4%4.4% .9%.9% 1.9%1.9%
Consequences of Party Consequences of Party ReformReform Increase in number of primariesIncrease in number of primaries Increase in importance of mediaIncrease in importance of media Increase in importance of early Increase in importance of early
primaries (and momentum and primaries (and momentum and expectations!)expectations!)
Decreases importance of national Decreases importance of national party conventionsparty conventions
Consequences of Party Consequences of Party ReformReform Increase in number of primariesIncrease in number of primaries Increase in importance of mediaIncrease in importance of media Increase in importance of early Increase in importance of early
primariesprimaries Decreases importance of national party Decreases importance of national party
conventionsconventions Decreases importance of state party Decreases importance of state party
leadersleaders Party activists give way to candidate Party activists give way to candidate
activistsactivists
Changes After 1968Changes After 1968
McGovern-Fraser reformsMcGovern-Fraser reforms
FECAFECA
Federal Election Federal Election Campaign Act Campaign Act
Creates a Creates a voluntary voluntary subsidy for subsidy for candidates who enter primary electionscandidates who enter primary elections– All funds candidates raise in amounts of All funds candidates raise in amounts of
$250 or less (if they raise $5000 in 20 $250 or less (if they raise $5000 in 20 different states) are different states) are matchedmatched by the federal by the federal government on Jan 1 of election yeargovernment on Jan 1 of election year
Bans large donations by individualsBans large donations by individuals– Individuals can only give $2000 to a Individuals can only give $2000 to a
primary candidateprimary candidate
Consequences of Party Consequences of Party Reform & FECAReform & FECA Increase in number of primariesIncrease in number of primaries Increase in importance of mediaIncrease in importance of media Increase in importance of early Increase in importance of early
primariesprimaries Decreases importance of national party Decreases importance of national party
conventionsconventions Decreases importance of state party Decreases importance of state party
leadersleaders Harder to raise money (takes longer to Harder to raise money (takes longer to
raise big money in small contributions!)raise big money in small contributions!)
A Couple of Problems?A Couple of Problems?
Ideological primary voters?Ideological primary voters?
Candidates mobilize factions?Candidates mobilize factions?