the role of arthography guided closed reduction in reducing the incidence of avn in cdh
DESCRIPTION
THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH. Published in J Ped. Orthop B 2005. INTRODUCTION. CDH is common in S.A. AVN is a know major complication of CDH treatment that should be avoided. Aim of the study: Compare incidence of AVN in C.R: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION
IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF
AVN IN CDH
Published in J Ped. Orthop B 2005
![Page 2: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
• CDH is common in S.A.• AVN is a know major complication of CDH
treatment that should be avoided.• Aim of the study:
– Compare incidence of AVN in C.R:• Without arthrography,
• With Arthrography guidance.
– Relation of type of limbus with incidence of AVN.
![Page 3: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
AVN
![Page 4: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Hip Arthrogram
![Page 5: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Medial adductor approach
![Page 6: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Arthrogram
![Page 7: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
![Page 8: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
“L-distance”
*
![Page 9: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
• Type of limbus (Leveuf):– Normal type I, sharp “Rose Thorn” sign.– Everted (subluxation pattern) type II– Inverted (dislocation pattern) type III
![Page 10: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
**
*
![Page 11: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Unconcentric Concentric
![Page 12: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MATERIALS & METHODS
• A prospective study.
• Riyadh College of Medicine & KKUH.
• Jan 1992 – 1996.
• N = 85 patients.
• No prior treatment received.
• All closed reduction & hip spica.
![Page 13: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MATERIALS & METHODS
• Two groups (closed reduction):– Group 1 arthrography guided.– Group 2 no arthrogram.
• Percutaneous adductor tenotomy done when needed.
• Follow up ≥ 5y.
![Page 14: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
MATERIALS & METHODS
• F/U:– 6 wks post C.R:
• If stable in extension broom-stick cast.• Otherwise another spica.
– Every 6 wks till hips fully stable:• Good acetabular cover,• Or till covered operatively.
• AVN Kalamchi & MacEwen.
![Page 15: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MATERIALS & METHODS
• Chi square test (compare the incidence of AVN in both groups).
• Fisher’s exact test (compare between different types of limbus at time of reduction in relation to development of AVN).
![Page 16: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MATERIALS & METHODSAccepted criteria for reduction
Group 1
• Concentric reduction (of the cartilaginous head).
• < 6 mm lateralization (irrespective of the limbus position).
![Page 17: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MATERIALS & METHODSAccepted criteria for reduction
Group 2
• Clinical femoral head felt stable with C.R.
• XR ossific nucleus:• Present opposite triradiate c. & medial to Perkin’s line.
• Not present normal Von Rosen line & intact Shenton’s line.
![Page 18: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RESULTS
• 85 patients.
• 124 hips.
• Female 59 (69%).
• Male 26 (31%).
• Age 3 -14m (average 7.3)
![Page 19: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
RESULTS
• Percutaneous adductor tenotomy done in:– 69 hips of 124 .– Group 1 = 40/48 (50.6%).– Group 2 = 29/37 (64.4%).
![Page 20: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
RESULTSComparison of patients in both groups
Group 1(CR with orthography)
Group 2(CR without orthography)
Total patients 48 37
Total hips 79 45
Mean age (m) 7.1 7.6
Female / Male 33 / 15 26 / 11
![Page 21: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
RESULTSOccurrence of AVN in both groups
Group 1(CR with orthography)
Group 2(CR without orthography)
AVN total 6 ( 7.6% ) 13 ( 28.9% )
type I 1 5
type II 2 1
type III 3 3
type IV 0 4
Mean age with AVN 8 8.9
![Page 22: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
RESULTSRelationship between classification of limbus & AVN in group I
Type of limbus
No. of
hipsF/M Lateralization
AVN I
AVN II
AVN III
AVN IV
AVN %
Normal 39 31/8 2 ± 0.5 1 0 0 0 2.6%
Everted 35 29/6 2.7 ± 1.3 0 2 0 0 5.7%
inverted 5 5/0 4.5 ± 0.5 1 0 2 0 60%
![Page 23: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• Severin’s “Docking Theory”: “Soft tissue obstructing concentric reduction would
yield in time with continuous pressure from the head if the hip is maintained in an appropriate position”.
![Page 24: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• Leveuf’s:
Docking without damage to the femoral head can occur if the obstacles to concentric reduction were minimal.
(e.g. everted limbus, minimal lateralization, & mild hour glass constriction).
Leveuf J. Primary congenital subluxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1947; 29-A : 149-162
Leveuf J. Results of open reduction of true congenital luxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1948; 30-A : 875-882
![Page 25: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• Chuinard: Femoral head cannot be relied upon to
compress all soft tissue obstacles and seat itself normally without adverse effects on the femoral head especially in infants with a mostly cartilaginous femoral heads.
Chuinard EG. Femoral osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Clin North America 1972; 3 : 157-174
![Page 26: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• Attempting C.R without arthrogram depends on:– Feeling good reduction,– Impression on position of the ossific nucleus:
• Not present !• If present it may be eccentric.
– Impression on amount of lateralization:• Other hip normal, can compare.• Other hip DDH !
![Page 27: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
DISCUSSION
Eccentric nucleus
![Page 28: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• Still NO treatment for AVN.
• Its not justifiable to subject DDH patients to AVN.
Most of the time the outcome of no treatment is better than the outcome of treatment with severe form of
AVN.
![Page 29: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CONCLUSION
C.R. without arthrography guidance is unsafe
due to high incidence of AVN.
![Page 30: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CONCLUSION
Arthrography guided C.R.
less incidence of AVN.
( 7.6% c.f. 28.9% )
![Page 31: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
CONCLUSION
Inverted type of limbus higher incidence of AVN c.f. normal or everted limbus.
( 60% c.f. 4.1% )
![Page 32: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
RECOMMENDATION
Criteria of accepting
arthrography-guided closed reduction
1. Stable,
2. Concentric,
3. Lateralization ≤ 4 mm,
4. Non-inverted limbus.
![Page 33: THE ROLE OF ARTHOGRAPHY GUIDED CLOSED REDUCTION IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF AVN IN CDH](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56813d24550346895da6e9c8/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)