the social sharing of news, presentation at association of internet researchers' conference ir...
DESCRIPTION
This is the presentation on the social sharing of news, presentation at Association of Internet Researchers' conference IR 15, Daegu, Korea, Oct 23rd 2014. This is very much work in progress, mainly about the theoretical dimensions of the project.TRANSCRIPT
The social sharing of news
Jakob Linaa JensenAssociate professor
Media Studies and Center for Internet Studies, Aarhus University
Paper presented at IR15, Daegu October 23rd 2014
New wine on old bottles?
"What a strange practice it is, when you think of it, that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his
face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip!"
Charles Cooley in 1908 on the perils of the daily newspaper
Agenda
• Project presentation• Theoretical approaches• Future methodology• First empirical findings
• The access to producing news is widening through blogs, websites, citizen journalism (Axel Bruns, Graham Meikle)
• News are shared through social media, not at least social network sites like Twitter and Facebook
• Borderline between production, consumption and sharing is evaporating
Some existing studies on (online) news
• Pew Internet & The American Life reports (2011-12)
• OFCOM : News Consumption in the UK (2013)
• Schrøder & Kleis Nielsen: Danish Studies (2012-13)
• Reuter Institute reports
• Produsage (Bruns, 2008)• Ambient news (Hermida, 2010)• Social sharing (Hermida, 2010)• Facebook as meta-medium (Linaa
Jensen & Tække (2013)
Project “Meaning Across Media”
• 3 year project sponsored by Danish National Research Council (thanks )
• Focusing on content across media and platforms rather than media and platforms themselves
• Various sub-projects but a strong focus on news
• Production, consumption and sharing
News is not new…
Theories on newsThe mass media age
Macro level Agenda-setting (McCombs & Shaw, 1972)News cycles (Cook, 1997; Rosenberg & Feldman, 2008)Newsworthiness (Galtung & Ruge, 1965; Harcup & o’Neill (2001)
Meso level Opinion leadership (Katz & Lazarsfeld, 1955)
Micro level Consonance/dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957; Perloff, 2003)Credibility (Hovland, 1959; Meyer et al., 2010)
Theories on newsThe social media age
Macro level Agenda-setting (McCombs & Shaw, 1972)News cycles (Cook, 1997; Rosenberg & Feldman, 2008)
Meso level Newsworthiness (Galtung & Ruge, 1965; Harcup & o’Neill (2001)Spreadability (Jenkins, 2013)
Micro level Opinion leadership (Katz & Lazarsfeld, 1955)Consonance/dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957; Perloff, 2003)Social presence (Short et al., 1976; Meyer et al., 2010)Immediacy (Wiener & Mehrabian, 1968; Bolter & Grusin, 2000“Sense of being with another” (Skalski & Tamborini, 2005)
Theoretical moves
• From macro- to micro level• Encompassing logics of sharing,
virality
• Social interaction logics become important
• From newsworthiness to shareworthiness
From search to filter culture
• The age of libraries: getting information• The age of internet: getting rid of information
• Gate-keeping is not dead• But more filters needed
• Filtering based on interactivity on socialization
• Folksonomies, curation
• From information to social interaction• Knowledge and information defined
by networks (and algorithms)
Hypotheses
• The news shared in social media are partly overlapping with those presented in TV, radio, papers etc.
• When news cycles are changed because of the introduction of social media, new dynamics of importance, relevance and newsworthiness come true
• Shared news might be framed according to these criteria (Dog Bites Man might get more shares than Man Bites Dog)
Methodology
Macro level
Quantitative survey (N=1070) on media use
Meso level
Hashtag analysis – networks + content
Micro level
Qualitative interview – patterns of sharing, logics, motivation
News consumption Danish political
newsInternational political news
Celebrity news
Face to face 28 17 19
Old media
Printed 37 30 31
TV, radio 74 66 60
New media
Websites, blogs 34 27 31
Email, sms 7 4 5
Social media 19 11 21
Other 2 1 1
Did not read news 13 22 25
News sharing Danish political
newsInternational political news
Celebrity news
Face to face 21 15 13
Printed media 1 1 1
New media
Websites, blogs 4 2 2
Email, sms 5 4 3
Social media sharing 9 5 6
Social media commenting
10 6 6
Other 0 0 0
Did not share news 70 78 80
Findings
• Much more consumption than sharing
• TV still dominant for consumption• National politics and celeb news
most popular
• More F2F than social media sharing• Sharers and commenters the same
User clusters
Social media sharer
sNew media consumers
Old media consumers F2F sharers