the state and future of learning management systems panel presentation
TRANSCRIPT
Panelists: Devlin Dailey, Instructure; Warren Ashley, EdD, Reza Boroon, CSUDH; Jeff Borden, Pearson; Barry Dahl, Desire2Learn; Jim
Hermens, Blackboard Moderated by: John Whitmer, CSU Office of the Chancellor &
CSU Chico
The State and Future of Learning Management SystemsSouthern California Technology in Education Conference
17 April 2012
Download slides at: http://slidesha.re/IFTPXk
Agenda
1. LMS Adoption – Nationally & in Cal State
2. Panel Discussion
STATE OF THE LMSFROM AN ADOPTION PERSPECTIVE
High Institutional Adoption
93% of higher education institutions have a standard LMS deployed (Green, 2010)
Making Gains in Adoption & Deployment
Source: Smith, S. D., & Caruson, J. B. (2010). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2010 (Vol. Research Study, Vol. 6). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
But not there yet …
Source: Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). The ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
LMS Licensing Trend
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20130
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Historical Trend: CSU Campus Enterprise LMS Licenses
D2L
Moodle
WebCT/Bb LearnNu
mb
er o
f C
amp
use
s
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20130
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
Historical Trend: CSU FTES per Enterprise LMS License
D2L
Moodle
WebCT/Bb Learn
Academic Year
CS
U F
TE
S
CSU Course Sections using Moodle
9
Sonoma State
SF State
Maritime
Humboldt
CSU San Marcos
CSU Northridge
CSU Monterey Bay
*Stanislaus
*Fullerton
*Cal Poly SLO
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
671
2,997
64
2,270
1,098
2,492
553
15
892
187
2,191
7,064
811
3,911
1,162
3,687
614
0
Sum of Active Course Shells
Sum of Inactive Course Shells
* Campuses in transition or piloting Moodle
CSU Students using Moodle in 1+ Sections
10
CSU Monterey Bay
SF State
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
5,074
31,607
503
1,435
Sum of Students using LMS in at least one Sec-tion
Sum of Students not us-ing LMS
PANEL QUESTIONS
1. WHAT IS THE GREATEST CONTRIBUTION THE LMS HAS MADE TO TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION?
2. WHAT IS A “NEXT GENERATION” LMS? WHAT PROBLEMS DOES IT SOLVE, OR NEW CAPABILITIES DOES IT BRING?
3. WHAT IS THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE FUTURE OF THE LMS?
4. WHAT FUTURE TECHNICAL / FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT ON THE LMS? (E.G. BLTI, MOBILE, TABLETS, ANALYTICS)
5. WHAT DOES BLACKBOARD’S ENTRY INTO OPEN SOURCE MEAN FOR BLACKBOARD? FOR THE GREATER ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE?
6. WHY IS LMS REPORTING (LET ALONE ANALYTICS) SO IMMATURE? HOW CAN WE FIX IT?
18
Q&A and Contact Info
Contact Info: • John Whitmer ([email protected])
Download slides at: http://slidesha.re/IFTPXk