the top 10 myths and realities of s&op
DESCRIPTION
The Top 10 Myths and Realities of S&OPTRANSCRIPT
The Top 10 Myths and Realities of S&OP
Presented by: Peter Metcalfe
Partner Oliver Wight Asia Pacific
25th October 2012 1 © Oliver Wight International
Last minute changes poorly managed Poor communications and unsynchronised plans Poor analysis No corrective actions in process improvement Opportunities to increase sales are lost
Mixed messages lead to sub-optimised performance
© Oliver Wight International 2
Who owns the S&OP process?
3
“The S&OP process should be owned or sponsored by the demand planning or supply chain function. These teams are in the thick of any supply chain issues and are best positioned to deal with them.”
© Oliver Wight International
Who owns the S&OP process?
4
Demand Review
Product Management
Review Supply Review
Management Business Review
© Oliver Wight International
And the next problem S&OP needs to solve today is…
5
“S&OP is a tactical, real-time process that enables the quick identification and response to problems as they arise. Supply chain planning applications that manage such tactics as daily replenishment and forecast planning are used to address any real-time issues.”
© Oliver Wight International
And the next problem S&OP needs to solve today is…
6
-1 -2 -3
25 % 75% Demand / Supply/ Product Management
DETAIL PLAN
75% 10% 15% S&OP/IBP
Horizon (Months)
Weekly Review
Month / Period Review
1 4 24 2 3
© Oliver Wight International
There’s too much strategy and not enough execution
7
“S&OP deals with product families and a fixed hierarchy, so how does that really help us? The devil is in the details and S&OP doesn’t go there.”
© Oliver Wight International
There’s too much strategy and not enough execution
8 © Oliver Wight International
Input
From Latest Plan By Segment
1 4 24 2 3
From the detail
systems Input
Item Level Plans and Schedules
Integrated Business Planning
There’s too much strategy and not enough execution
9
Weekly Review
Horizon (Months)
Month / Period Review
© Oliver Wight International
1 2 5 3 4 Time Scale in Years
6 0
There’s too much strategy and not enough execution
10
5 Year Strategies (Roadmaps) + CSF’s
3 Year Tactics (Programs) + KPI’s
24 Month Rolling Process
At “Segment” Level
Focused on Change
5 Element Process
Gap Analysis INTE
GR
ATED
BU
SIN
ESS
PLAN
NIN
G 5 or 10 year Strategic Plan and Strategic Business Objectives
Vision, Mission, Value Proposition, Competitive Priorities, Values & Guiding Principles
Volume
Value
Resources
Product
Demand
Supply
Reconciliation
Monthly Cycle Worksheet
Annual Planning Projects & Tasks
Annual Planning Projects & Tasks
© Oliver Wight International
Just look backwards
11
“S&OP is really just a review of historical data. There is no ability within the process to do any simulation of suggested changes, let alone compare a differing scenario to the optimal plan.”
© Oliver Wight International
Risk Analysis
Scenario Modelling & Optimization
12
IN OUT
Identify Objectives
Create Model
Model Validation & Sign Off
Develop Scenarios
Conduct Analysis
Options & Recommendations
Decision & Actions
© Oliver Wight International
It’s all in the numbers
13
“S&OP is limited to quantitative views of supply, demand and financial plans. Just look at the numbers and you’ve got what you need to support decisions.”
© Oliver Wight International
It’s all in the numbers
14
Types of Assumptions
Competitor activity
Economy & industry growth rates
Performance & rate of improvement
Markets conditions
Customers
Numbers alone are ineffective Thinking behind the numbers …
Determine Vulnerabilities and Opportunities
Develop plans to defend or exploit
“Use assumptions to shape the future rather than as a basis for excuses about non-performance”
© Oliver Wight International
S&OP is just another time consuming meeting without little action
15
“S&OP is just another executive meeting; nothing really ever comes out of it. Decisions made in the meeting stay in the meeting and rarely get executed.”
© Oliver Wight International
S&OP is just another time consuming meeting without little action
16
IR Product Demand Supply MBR
ANALYSE GAPS DETERMINE SOLUTIONS
Measures
Data Set
One Page Summaries
Templates
Analyse
Financial Evaluation
Collate & Exploit
Model & Recommend
Measures
Issues
Projected P&L + Balance Sheet Opportunities Vulnerabilities
GAP CLOSING DECISIONS
© Oliver Wight International
Who’s worrying about demand?
17
“S&OP relies on a fixed demand plan or statistical forecast. It doesn’t emphasize how we may need to shape demand up or down to meet business objectives.”
© Oliver Wight International
Baseline
Scenario A
Scenario B
Scenario C
Integrate to 24 month Financial view
Who’s worrying about demand?
18
Product Management
Demand
Supply
Continuous Reconciliation to optimise Business
© Oliver Wight International
It’s too complex to involve trading partners
19
“S&OP processes are too complex and difficult to manage — especially when trying to systematically incorporate external trading partner feedback into the internal consensus demand and supply plans.”
© Oliver Wight International
Think Value Proposition; Value Chain & Customer Experience
Optimise all steps
It’s too complex to involve trading partners
OPS-1 WHSE TIER - 1 TIER -2 OPS-2 DIST-1 DIST - 2
Customer Experience VALUE CHAIN
SUPPLY CHAIN
© Oliver Wight International 20
Finance has the last word
21
“We spend so much time striving to create a perfectly balanced supply and demand plan, yet too often it’s a futile exercise. The finance team is just going to override any S&OP plan that we create, so why bother?”
© Oliver Wight International
Finance has the last word
Strong financial support at every step in the process
Product Planning Manager
Demand Planning Manager
Supply Planning Manager
S&OP Process Leader
Marketing Finance
Commercial Sales
Operations Finance
Corporate Finance
22
Let’s run S&OP processes on auto-pilot
23
“S&OP can be solved with the implementation of a tool. Just configure the software and turn on the black box.”
© Oliver Wight International
Let’s run S&OP processes on auto-pilot
24
PEOPLE & BEHAVIOURS
TOOLS PROCESSES
© Oliver Wight International
Educate Executives and Middle Management Designing the Process Establishing the calendar and rhythm of S&OP Creating an organisation suited to S&OP Transparent and collaborative decisions The right tools from strategy to execution Coaching executives
Let’s run S&OP processes on auto-pilot
© Oliver Wight International 25
S&OP and IBP: Decades of Evolution – The Macro Evolution
70s early
80s mid
80s late
80s late
90s early
2000s 2000 to present
Production Planning Balancing
Supply & Demand
and Inventory Control
Financial Integration
Product and
Portfolio Management Integration
Supply Chain
Collaboration
Scenario Planning
and Strategic
Deployment
Sales & Operations Planning
© Oliver Wight International 26 © Oliver Wight International
Increased demand plan accuracy from 18 to 25 percent Increased sales revenues from 10 to 25 percent Increased on time delivery from 10 to 15 percent Reduced inventory from 18 to 46 percent Reduced safety stock from 11 to 45 percent Increased productivity from 30 to 45 percent Increased bottom-line performance
An effective process is worth the effort
27 © Oliver Wight International
“Is your process a
myth or a reality?”
Ask yourself and your colleagues…
28 © Oliver Wight International
If you require further details on how to implement S&OP or improve your current S&OP process please feel free to visit our website: www.oliverwightasiapacific.com
Or contact Peter Metcalfe in Hong Kong on +852 9449 6538 (mobile), +852 3975 8399 (office)
Email: [email protected]
Further information
29 © Oliver Wight International
Acknowledgement
The inspiration for this presentation was derived from an article titled ‘The Top 10 Myths and Realities of S&OP’ that was co-authored and published in 2009 by Colleen Crum and Fred Baumann. Fred Baumann is Vice President, Industry Strategy at JDA Software. Colleen is a Managing Principal of Oliver Wight Americas. Our thanks also to the China Supply Chain Executive Council for facilitating this session
30
31