the trillion £ question: how to make the most of school staff?
TRANSCRIPT
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
The trillion £ question:
How to make the most of school staff?
Presentation at: https://goo.gl/b2Zt9U
11.50-12.30, session 3, room M211
ResearchED 2017 National Conference #rED17
Louis Coiffait
Head of Education
Reform – an independent, non-party think tank
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Agenda
1 The research project
2 Why teachers matter
3 Workforce challenges
Three solutions:
4 National: reforming teacher training funding
5 Regional: Workforce Boards
6 Local: growing more schools groups
7 Q&A
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
The research project
1 Interviews with forty-one experts
2 Roundtable with nineteen
3 Analysis of existing data and research
4 Report over fifty pages long
5 A comprehensive new vision for the workforce
6 Fifteen recommendations (just three shared here)
7 Out in full later this month…
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Why teachers matter
Maintaining a vital public service
1 Single biggest impact on pupil outcomes
2 With benefits to both pupils and the country
3 Schools spend 70-80% of their budgets on staff
4 Over a trillion £ invested in current workforce
5 A company with such an asset would invest in
constant maintenance and upgrades, instead…
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Current approaches to our trillion pound asset?
A) Over-emphasis on recruitment not retention
B) Blunt, short-term, opaque national approach
C) Unfair playing field for some schools
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Workforce challenges
Trouble brewing
1 Rising vacancies
2 Especially some regions and ‘core’ subjects
3 +19.1% secondary pupils by 2026, +2.2% primary
4 Workforce Census data inaccurate
5 Disadvantaged students more likely to be taught
by unqualified and inexperienced teachers
6 7-year EBacc delay, mainly from workforce issues
7 Two decades of policy on standards, structures
and accountability – but consequences for staff
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Total vacancies and as a proportion
of teachers in post
Vacancies growing overall
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Vacancies as a proportion of all teachers
in post, in four subjects
Vacancies particularly acute in EBacc subjects
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Proportion of teachers without a relevant
post A-level qualification, in five subjects
Some subject specialists in short supply
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Vacancies or temporarily filled posts as a
proportion of all teachers, by region
Vacancies vary between (and within) regions
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Trends in number of secondary teachers
and pupils
The approaching tidal wave…
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Three (out of fifteen) solutions…
(see Karen; cake and saltatorius, as promised…)
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
National: current ITT funding
Focus on recruiting and training (not retention)
1 Vacancies mean focus on quantity not quality
2 Agency costs rising +27% to £1.3 billion
3 Compete with alternative careers in each subject
4 Attract more and different people
5 Nearly £1billion of recruitment bursaries DfE’s
only answer in recent years
6 But poor evidence of value for money, with risk
of ‘deadweight’ (people applying anyway)
7 All the money spent on recruitment, not retention
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
National: Mean bursary level and annual exit
rate by subject (2015-16)
Higher-cost recruitment has lower retention
Subject
Mean bursary level
(1st, 2.1 and 2.2) Annual exit rate
Sciences £19,571 10.4%
Mathematics £25,000 10.3%
Languages £25,000 10.2%
Technology £7,000 10%
English £6,000 9.7%
Art, drama and music £4,333 8.4%
Humanities £4,333 8.5%
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
National: reforming teacher training funding
From recruitment bursaries to retention rewards
1 All bursary money currently spent to recruit
2 Phased retention rewards would help retention
e.g. £25k becomes five annual £5k payments
4 Helps get people past tough first five years
5 Helps discourage (or turn) ‘bursary tourists’
6 Less risk than ‘service periods’ with sanctions
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Regional: current picture
Who’s accountable for the workforce?
1 Multiple overlapping / opaque programmes,
often micro-managed from the centre
2 Bureaucratic caps and allocations
3 Partial and ad-hoc regionalisation
4 £1.43m National Teaching Service recruited … 24
“Nick Gibb can’t be responsible for filling
every teaching vacancy!”
Interviewee
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Current centralised picture (acronym bingo)
Unclear if spending effective
DfE
9 N/RSCs
8 HTBs
32 SRIBs
NTS
£1.43m
HEIs
Recruitment
marketing
£16.7m
SCITTs
Regional
infrastructure
/ delivery staff 12 OAs
Bursaries /
scholarships
£1bn
TLIF
REP
NPSS
SSIF
MPTSP
Intl. recruiting
£10m
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Regional: Workforce Boards
Funding and decisions devolved to each region
1 Tinkering not working, a new vision needed
2 A more tailored approach to the workforce
3 A single workforce funding pot for each region
4 New Boards decide regional workforce strategy
5 Respond to local needs, develop solutions
6 New Brokers win contracts to deliver the strategy
/ help with solutions e.g. impartial brokering /
advice for staff in the region
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Regional Workforce Boards
Bringing all regional stakeholders together
Board –
decides
strategy
Broker –
helps deliver
strategy
Single
workforce
funding pot
Chartered
CollegeHEIs SCITTs
Teaching
schools
Reps for all
schools
LEPs / Metros
/ Mayors
Regional Workforce Board
RSC (Chair)
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Local: growing more schools groups
All harder / impossible for stand-alone schools
1 Distinctive career offers to staff
2 Greater capacity for development / progression
3 Succession planning and leadership training
4 Secondments and shared posts
5 Centrally employed / deployed staff across group
6 Centralised support services e.g. HR, recruitment
7 Negotiate better agency and CPD contracts
8 Capacity and data for workforce planning
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
Local: growing more schools groups
MATs and federations hold more cards
1 Clear benefits of groups, especially for staff
2 True of both MATs and ‘hard’ federations
3 Stand-alone schools struggle to compete
4 But two thirds of schools not in such a group
5 Need to understand and share benefits better
6 DfE should be agnostic about group type
7 Federations the ‘gateway drug’...
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank
How our trillion pound asset should be treated?
A) Incentives to retain (not just recruit) staff
B) A clear and tailored regional approach
C) A fairer playing field between schools