the trillion £ question: how to make the most of school staff?

23
@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank The trillion £ question: How to make the most of school staff? Presentation at: https://goo.gl/b2Zt9U 11.50-12.30, session 3, room M211 ResearchED 2017 National Conference #rED17 Louis Coiffait Head of Education Reform an independent, non-party think tank

Upload: louis-coiffait

Post on 28-Jan-2018

6 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

The trillion £ question:

How to make the most of school staff?

Presentation at: https://goo.gl/b2Zt9U

11.50-12.30, session 3, room M211

ResearchED 2017 National Conference #rED17

Louis Coiffait

Head of Education

Reform – an independent, non-party think tank

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Agenda

1 The research project

2 Why teachers matter

3 Workforce challenges

Three solutions:

4 National: reforming teacher training funding

5 Regional: Workforce Boards

6 Local: growing more schools groups

7 Q&A

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

The research project

1 Interviews with forty-one experts

2 Roundtable with nineteen

3 Analysis of existing data and research

4 Report over fifty pages long

5 A comprehensive new vision for the workforce

6 Fifteen recommendations (just three shared here)

7 Out in full later this month…

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Why teachers matter

Maintaining a vital public service

1 Single biggest impact on pupil outcomes

2 With benefits to both pupils and the country

3 Schools spend 70-80% of their budgets on staff

4 Over a trillion £ invested in current workforce

5 A company with such an asset would invest in

constant maintenance and upgrades, instead…

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Current approaches to our trillion pound asset?

A) Over-emphasis on recruitment not retention

B) Blunt, short-term, opaque national approach

C) Unfair playing field for some schools

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Workforce challenges

Trouble brewing

1 Rising vacancies

2 Especially some regions and ‘core’ subjects

3 +19.1% secondary pupils by 2026, +2.2% primary

4 Workforce Census data inaccurate

5 Disadvantaged students more likely to be taught

by unqualified and inexperienced teachers

6 7-year EBacc delay, mainly from workforce issues

7 Two decades of policy on standards, structures

and accountability – but consequences for staff

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Total vacancies and as a proportion

of teachers in post

Vacancies growing overall

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Vacancies as a proportion of all teachers

in post, in four subjects

Vacancies particularly acute in EBacc subjects

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Proportion of teachers without a relevant

post A-level qualification, in five subjects

Some subject specialists in short supply

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Vacancies or temporarily filled posts as a

proportion of all teachers, by region

Vacancies vary between (and within) regions

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Trends in number of secondary teachers

and pupils

The approaching tidal wave…

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Three (out of fifteen) solutions…

(see Karen; cake and saltatorius, as promised…)

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

National: current ITT funding

Focus on recruiting and training (not retention)

1 Vacancies mean focus on quantity not quality

2 Agency costs rising +27% to £1.3 billion

3 Compete with alternative careers in each subject

4 Attract more and different people

5 Nearly £1billion of recruitment bursaries DfE’s

only answer in recent years

6 But poor evidence of value for money, with risk

of ‘deadweight’ (people applying anyway)

7 All the money spent on recruitment, not retention

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

National: Mean bursary level and annual exit

rate by subject (2015-16)

Higher-cost recruitment has lower retention

Subject

Mean bursary level

(1st, 2.1 and 2.2) Annual exit rate

Sciences £19,571 10.4%

Mathematics £25,000 10.3%

Languages £25,000 10.2%

Technology £7,000 10%

English £6,000 9.7%

Art, drama and music £4,333 8.4%

Humanities £4,333 8.5%

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

National: reforming teacher training funding

From recruitment bursaries to retention rewards

1 All bursary money currently spent to recruit

2 Phased retention rewards would help retention

e.g. £25k becomes five annual £5k payments

4 Helps get people past tough first five years

5 Helps discourage (or turn) ‘bursary tourists’

6 Less risk than ‘service periods’ with sanctions

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Regional: current picture

Who’s accountable for the workforce?

1 Multiple overlapping / opaque programmes,

often micro-managed from the centre

2 Bureaucratic caps and allocations

3 Partial and ad-hoc regionalisation

4 £1.43m National Teaching Service recruited … 24

“Nick Gibb can’t be responsible for filling

every teaching vacancy!”

Interviewee

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Current centralised picture (acronym bingo)

Unclear if spending effective

DfE

9 N/RSCs

8 HTBs

32 SRIBs

NTS

£1.43m

HEIs

Recruitment

marketing

£16.7m

SCITTs

Regional

infrastructure

/ delivery staff 12 OAs

Bursaries /

scholarships

£1bn

TLIF

REP

NPSS

SSIF

MPTSP

Intl. recruiting

£10m

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Regional: Workforce Boards

Funding and decisions devolved to each region

1 Tinkering not working, a new vision needed

2 A more tailored approach to the workforce

3 A single workforce funding pot for each region

4 New Boards decide regional workforce strategy

5 Respond to local needs, develop solutions

6 New Brokers win contracts to deliver the strategy

/ help with solutions e.g. impartial brokering /

advice for staff in the region

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Regional Workforce Boards

Bringing all regional stakeholders together

Board –

decides

strategy

Broker –

helps deliver

strategy

Single

workforce

funding pot

Chartered

CollegeHEIs SCITTs

Teaching

schools

Reps for all

schools

LEPs / Metros

/ Mayors

Regional Workforce Board

RSC (Chair)

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Local: growing more schools groups

All harder / impossible for stand-alone schools

1 Distinctive career offers to staff

2 Greater capacity for development / progression

3 Succession planning and leadership training

4 Secondments and shared posts

5 Centrally employed / deployed staff across group

6 Centralised support services e.g. HR, recruitment

7 Negotiate better agency and CPD contracts

8 Capacity and data for workforce planning

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Local: growing more schools groups

MATs and federations hold more cards

1 Clear benefits of groups, especially for staff

2 True of both MATs and ‘hard’ federations

3 Stand-alone schools struggle to compete

4 But two thirds of schools not in such a group

5 Need to understand and share benefits better

6 DfE should be agnostic about group type

7 Federations the ‘gateway drug’...

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

How our trillion pound asset should be treated?

A) Incentives to retain (not just recruit) staff

B) A clear and tailored regional approach

C) A fairer playing field between schools

@LouisMMCoiffait @ReformThinkTank

Thank you! Questions?

Our research report on the school

workforce is out later this month