thinking! psychology 2606 some introductory thoughts we are clearly the most cognitively complex...
TRANSCRIPT
Thinking!Thinking!
Psychology 2606Psychology 2606
Some introductory thoughtsSome introductory thoughts
We are clearly the most cognitively We are clearly the most cognitively complex animals on this planetcomplex animals on this planet
We can think about objects that are not We can think about objects that are not presentpresent
We can think about abstract ideasWe can think about abstract ideasWe use symbolic and syntactic languageWe use symbolic and syntactic languageWe plan and string events togetherWe plan and string events together
So, how is thought encoded in the So, how is thought encoded in the brain?brain?
Monkeys, dots, motion and V5Monkeys, dots, motion and V5 So, individual cortical neurons were detecting So, individual cortical neurons were detecting
motion and making decisionsmotion and making decisions Hebb’s idea of the cell assemblyHebb’s idea of the cell assembly The association cortex is key in thoughtThe association cortex is key in thought Anything not primary is association (that is most Anything not primary is association (that is most
of the cortex)of the cortex) Receives input from the thalamus, but from Receives input from the thalamus, but from
areas that themselves get input from primary areas that themselves get input from primary sensory areassensory areas
Spatial cognitionSpatial cognition
Our ability to deal with spatial stimuli may Our ability to deal with spatial stimuli may have helped us evolve ‘consciousness’have helped us evolve ‘consciousness’
That and the standing up and big heart That and the standing up and big heart thingthing
We seem to have specialized sub systems We seem to have specialized sub systems to deal with different types of informationto deal with different types of information
Modules if you willModules if you will
A Purely Geometric Module in A Purely Geometric Module in Human Spatial Human Spatial
Representation?Representation?David R. BrodbeckDavid R. Brodbeck 1 1
Andrea E. Pike Andrea E. Pike 22
Cory Spracklin Cory Spracklin 11
Department of PsychologyDepartment of Psychology
1-Sir Wilfred Grenfell College, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1-Sir Wilfred Grenfell College, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Corner Brook, NLCorner Brook, NL
2-Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL2-Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL
IntroductionIntroduction
Cheng (1986) got the ball rollingCheng (1986) got the ball rollingOr the cocoa puff, as the case may be…Or the cocoa puff, as the case may be…
Basically, he found that rats would use Basically, he found that rats would use geometric information to locate food in a geometric information to locate food in a rectangular arenarectangular arenaMost of their errors were to rotations of the Most of their errors were to rotations of the
originally baited locationoriginally baited location
Cheng (1986)Cheng (1986) He then applied featural He then applied featural
informationinformation wallswalls cornerscorners
The rats still made errors, The rats still made errors, though most of these though most of these were rotational errorswere rotational errors
He concluded that the He concluded that the rats were responding to rats were responding to the geometry of the box.the geometry of the box.
Hermer and Spelke (1994)Hermer and Spelke (1994)
Tried the Cheng task with Tried the Cheng task with toddlers and adultstoddlers and adults
Disoriented the subjectsDisoriented the subjects Using a cueUsing a cue Toddlers are not unlike Toddlers are not unlike
ratsrats Adults are different, seem Adults are different, seem
to follow the cueto follow the cue Same in Pike (2001)Same in Pike (2001)
MethodMethod
We decided to rotate the objectWe decided to rotate the objectA rectangle on a computer monitorA rectangle on a computer monitor
Subjects (or participants, or whatever..) Subjects (or participants, or whatever..) were shown a red dot on a black rectanglewere shown a red dot on a black rectangle
The rectangle was spun about the middleThe rectangle was spun about the middleDot fadedDot fadedWhere was the dot?Where was the dot?
Uncued Test ResultsUncued Test Results
Original Dot LocationOriginal Dot Location
31.0% +/- 2.7731.0% +/- 2.77
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
18.2% +/- 3.4318.2% +/- 3.43
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
17.4% +/- 2.8817.4% +/- 2.88
Rotational ErrorRotational Error
33.4% +/- 3.94 33.4% +/- 3.94
Cued Rectangle ResultsCued Rectangle Results
Original Dot LocationOriginal Dot Location
37.2% +/- 3.5837.2% +/- 3.58
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
11.6% +/- 3.3811.6% +/- 3.38
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
10.8% +/- 2.8810.8% +/- 2.88
Rotational ErrorRotational Error
40.4% +/- 3.62 40.4% +/- 3.62
So what?So what?
Well, it seems that whenever they can, Well, it seems that whenever they can, people will use geometry in this taskpeople will use geometry in this task
Even if there is a reliable cueEven if there is a reliable cueWhat if we made geometry useless?What if we made geometry useless?A squareA square
Uncued SquareUncued Square
Original Dot LocationOriginal Dot Location
23.2% +/- 2.5723.2% +/- 2.57
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
24.8% +/- 3.4624.8% +/- 3.46
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
23.4% +/- 2.9923.4% +/- 2.99
Rotational ErrorRotational Error
28.6% +/- 4.00 28.6% +/- 4.00
Cued SquareCued Square
Original Dot LocationOriginal Dot Location
34.2% +/- 2.7934.2% +/- 2.79
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
23.2% +/- 3.6323.2% +/- 3.63
Reflection ErrorReflection Error
28.0% +/- 3.0128.0% +/- 3.01
Rotational ErrorRotational Error
14.6% +/- 3.77 14.6% +/- 3.77
What does it all mean?What does it all mean?
Evidence of a feature independent Evidence of a feature independent geometric modulegeometric module
People will use features, if forcedPeople will use features, if forcedUnder certain circumstancesUnder certain circumstances
Rotational errors disappear when Rotational errors disappear when geometry is uselessgeometry is uselessErrors then become based on the featureErrors then become based on the feature
So, What Does It All Mean?So, What Does It All Mean?
Clear evidence (we think) of a feature Clear evidence (we think) of a feature independent, geometric module in human independent, geometric module in human spatial processingspatial processing
Perhaps if we slowed the rotation we Perhaps if we slowed the rotation we would find better performance, and fewer would find better performance, and fewer rotational errors in the cued conditionrotational errors in the cued condition (Rotation was titrated until we found errors (Rotation was titrated until we found errors
reliably)reliably)
Future DirectionsFuture Directions
Does Length : Width follow Weber’s Law?Does Length : Width follow Weber’s Law?What if the dot was put closer to the centre What if the dot was put closer to the centre
of the stimulus?of the stimulus?Touch screenTouch screenHmmm what about pigeons?Hmmm what about pigeons?
Thanks toThanks to
So we have a spatial moduleSo we have a spatial module
It may be the case that input from this It may be the case that input from this spatial module, or cell assemblies on top spatial module, or cell assemblies on top of cell assemblies comes together in of cell assemblies comes together in associative areasassociative areas
These modules can be isolated WITHOUT These modules can be isolated WITHOUT wet neurophysiologywet neurophysiology
So, ‘the dot is here’ could be considered a So, ‘the dot is here’ could be considered a ‘thought’‘thought’
Putting it togetherPutting it together
In the cortex there are columns, individual In the cortex there are columns, individual bunches of cells that go across layers of bunches of cells that go across layers of the cortex that seem to for circuits togetherthe cortex that seem to for circuits together
Is this the unit of thought?Is this the unit of thought?Well, it might have something to do with itWell, it might have something to do with itBut still, we put all of our sensory and But still, we put all of our sensory and
memorial thoughts together to form an memorial thoughts together to form an experienceexperience
We started philosophically, why We started philosophically, why not end that waynot end that way
So, how are all of these things put So, how are all of these things put together into an experience?together into an experience?
The Binding ProblemThe Binding ProblemThis, and the engram may be the holy This, and the engram may be the holy
grails of neuroscience and psychologygrails of neuroscience and psychology