time-dependent response of plastics case study plastics_creep.pdf · time-dependent response of...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2014 CAE Associates
Time-Dependent Response of Plastics
– Case Study Accurate FEA of Engineering
Plastics Seminar
Tarrytown, NY
October 14, 2014
2
Case Study: Plastic Cap
The response of a threaded plastic cap used to seal a water spigot is
investigated.
— Cap is threaded onto a pipe, compressing the washer to create a watertight
seal.
— Loading consists of the axial preload and internal water pressure.
— Structural response over a time of 2 years is predicted.
— Room temperature.
Cut-away of cap
connection assembly.
Plastic cap
Pipe
Washer
3
Time-Dependent Modeling Approach
Many plastic materials exhibit creep behavior at room temperature.
Creep is the progressive deformation of a material at a constant stress.
— For engineering metals, creep is usually important at elevated temperatures
and under high stresses.
— Plastics can exhibit creep at room temperature.
Creep is normally assumed to have 3 steps:
— Primary – initial stage, usually has high rate of creep strain.
— Secondary – constant rate.
— Tertiary – creep failure.
4
Time-Dependent Modeling Approach
In finite element analyses, the modeling of creep includes the effect of
stress relaxation.
— Accumulation of creep strain will either increase the total strain (i.e. creep) or
reduce the elastic strain (i.e. relaxation).
Stress relaxation is the decrease of stress in a material under constant
strain.
Since a given point in the finite element model is not exactly perfectly
stress-controlled or strain-controlled, the analysis will predict the creep and
relaxation response from the same creep data and calculate the
appropriate stress and strain behavior.
5
Time-Dependent Modeling Approach
Creep rupture data represents the time to failure of a material under a
given stress.
— By predicting the stress distribution in a structure over time, these stresses can
be compared to stress rupture data to determine the structural integrity.
— Can be used to determine the factor of safety of a design.
An example creep rupture plot is shown below.
6
Geometry Definition
The physical geometry is axisymmetric except for the threads, which spiral
down the inner wall of the cap and the outer wall of the pipe.
Because the pitch of the threads typically results in a very shallow slope of
the thread, and since the expected behavior in the washer and the corner
region of the cap (high stress region) will essentially be axisymmetric, a 2D
axisymmetric model is used.
7
Load Definition
The design loading is defined as:
— Axial preload = 70 lbs.
— Internal water pressure = 75 psi.
The preload is applied using a bolt pretension loading on the pipe.
— The pretension elements will extend the pipe into the washer until the specified
preload magnitude is reached.
— Once the preload is reached, the extension distance is locked.
— The preload can change over time based on the response of the structure.
Once the preload and water pressure are applied, creep effects are turned
on and the analysis is performed out to 2 years.
8
Material Property Definition
The following material properties are used for the analysis:
— Elastic-plastic stress-strain curve for the plastic cap material.
— Creep material law for the plastic cap material.
— Hyperelastic material law for the washer.
— Linear elastic material properties for the pipe.
Stress-strain data used in the analysis:
— Data must be translated to true stress – log strain for large strain response.
9
Material Property Definition
Creep data used in the analysis:
— Creep data is creep strain accumulated as a function of time for various stress
levels, using room temperature data for this application.
— A creep law is then used to fit the creep data.
• The creep law extends the data to any stress level.
The creep law used in this analysis is a combined time-hardening creep
law that models primary and secondary creep:
— The constants in the creep law are found from a nonlinear regression analysis
to fit the data.
10
Mesh Definition
2D axisymmetric mesh is shown.
— Finer mesh used in the expected region of high stress.
11
Displacement Results
The plot below shows the displacement sum contour plot at the end of the
analysis (2 years).
— Note the compression of the washer forming the watertight seal.
12
Stress Results
The maximum principle stress contour is shown at the end of the
application of the preload:
13
Stress Results
The maximum principle stress contour is shown at the end of the
application of the water pressure:
14
Stress Results
The maximum principle stress contour is shown at the end of 2 years:
15
Preload As Function of Loading/Time
A portion of the preload is lost over time due to deformation of the cap.
— Time is shown with log scale in hours due to time period of 2 years.
Preload Water Pressure
16
Strain As Function of Loading/Time
A plot of the elastic, plastic, creep and total strain at the maximum stress
location.
Preload Water Pressure
17
Stress As Function of Loading/Time
Below is a plot of the maximum value of the maximum principle stress over
the range of time, with creep rupture data superimposed:
Preload Water Pressure
18
Conclusions
Based on the results of the time-dependent analysis of the plastic cap
assembly:
— The stresses after preload and water pressure application are below static
failure limits and creep rupture limits.
— Over time, even though the maximum stress in the cap is reduced due to a
combination of creep deformations that tend to reduce the preload and
relaxation of the plastic, the remaining stress level reaches the creep rupture
limit at approximately 10-100 hours.
— This analysis approach does not indicate catastrophic failure of the cap at this
time, but it indicates that failure will initiate at the high stress region.
— Life assessment indicates that the long-term structural integrity is in question,
and it is preferred that the calculated stresses would provide an adequate
factor of safety for creep rupture.
— Recommended design change: Eliminate lower threads that form notches in
high stress region.