tomas hopkins primeau professor of international relations

71
The Evolution of Political Units: Hunter-Gatherers to City-States to Regional Empires to Colonial Empire to the Modern State System Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Upload: hei

Post on 14-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Evolution of Political Units: Hunter-Gatherers to City-States to Regional Empires to Colonial Empire to the Modern State System. Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The Evolution of Political Units: Hunter-Gatherers to City-States to

Regional Empires to Colonial Empire to the Modern State System

Tomas Hopkins Primeau

Professor of International Relations

Page 2: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Two types of forces in nature and world history: “things come

together” or “things fall apart.” The same can be said of states and

empires.

Page 3: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Centripetal vs Centrifugal Forces in States and Empires

• City-States to Empires: Centripetal– Greek City States to Macedonian Empire

• Empires to Modern States: Centrifugal– Breakup of Ottoman Empire-creation of modern day

Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, among others

• Western Imperialism/Colonization: PETAL– Creation of British & French Empires in Africa/Asia

• UN Decolonization: FUGAL– Breakup of French Empire in Africa-Algeria, Morocco,

Tunisia, Mauritania, Senegal, Madagascar

Page 4: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Current movements of centripetal/centrifugal forces

• Breakup of large states centriFUGAL– Breakup of Soviet Union (1991)– Czechoslovakia (1993)– Yugoslavia (1994)– Sudan (2011)

• Expanding regional integration centriPETAL– Creation of European Union (1995)

• Common Currency, internal migration, citizenship issues

– Expansion of European Union: 27 states (1999-2012)– Creation of African Union (2002)

• Common security force

Page 5: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Kingdom Chiefdom

Individual BandFamily Tribe

Distant relativesBlood relatives

NOMADIC

MERIT-BASED,SEMI-NOMADIC & TEMPORARY

HEREDITARY,FIXED & PERMANENT

Evolution of Human Social Organization

Page 6: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Mesopotamian City-States c. 5000 BCMesopotamian City-States c. 5000 BC

Page 7: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Later conquered and incorporated into the Babylonian Empire

Page 8: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Greek City-Greek City-StatesStates

750-150 750-150 BCEBCE

Page 9: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Conquered and incorporated into Conquered and incorporated into Macedonian EmpireMacedonian Empire

Page 10: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

And still later conquered and And still later conquered and incorporated into Roman Empire incorporated into Roman Empire

Page 11: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Breakup of the Roman Empire Breakup of the Roman Empire

Page 12: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Feudal Europe: a constantly changing system of small kingdoms

Page 13: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 14: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The Westphalian “Peace”

Page 15: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Treaty of Westphalia (1648)• Experts point to this as the beginning of

the modern state system• Modern state system begins in Europe• Recognition of state “sovereignty” over

issues like religion (Protestant Reformation) diminished papal power

• State control over territory with well defined borders

• Note that neither Germany nor Italy exists• Series of “unified” small kingdoms

Page 16: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The State-Centric System

• The primary focus of world history and international relations becomes states

• A network of international norms and laws begins to develop between countries

• States are “sovereign” within their borders• Laws of War, Laws of Trade, Laws of Sea

Travel, Laws of Territorial Acquisition• Emergence of specialized IGO system• Later the creation of League of Nations and UN

Page 17: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Small German Kingdoms prior to 1871

Page 18: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Unified into modern “Germany” b.1871

Page 19: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Growth of Russian Empire

Page 20: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Transformation of the Regional Empires into “modern states”

• Many former “empires” transform themselves in to “Republics” i.e. “Peoples Republic of China” or “United States of America” or “Union of Socialist Soviet Republics” or “Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia” HOWEVER….

• They were still considered “Empires” by the various nations who lived within them

Page 21: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

From “Russian Empire” & Czar tothe “Soviet Union” & Premier but…

Page 22: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 23: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Peoples Republic of China…but

Page 24: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 25: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Kingdom of Serbs,Croats,Slovenes to “Yugoslav Socialist Republic” but

Page 26: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 27: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The onset of Western Colonialism in Asia and Africa: 1492 to 1945

• Columbus “discovers” the Americas while looking for trade route to the Indies

• Expansion and territorial takeover begins with Portuguese in Goa (India) in 1510

• Later come waves of Dutch and the British• British East India Company 1600• Dutch East India Company 1602• Business/trade contacts made with many small

Asian kingdoms turned into “protectorates”

Page 28: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

18th & 19th Century Colonization of Asia through “Protectorates”

Page 29: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 30: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Protectorates used by the Western colonial powers

• “it is an autonomous territory that is protected diplomatically or militarily against third parties by a stronger [western colonial] state or entity. However, it retains formal sovereignty, and remains a state under international law.”

Page 31: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

565 Princely States in India at Partition

Page 32: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

And “Sultanates” as protectorates

Page 33: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

And more protectorates and sultanates that today are called

Page 34: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

“states” like Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen

Page 35: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Onset of Western Colonialism: The “Scramble for Africa” 1880-1914

Page 36: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Look at the political boundaries of Europe: See any straight lines?

Page 37: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Now look at the political boundaries of Africa: Who drew those lines?

• Africa cut up just like a cake by the European powers at Berlin Conference, 1884-85

Page 38: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 39: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Colonial Possessions, 1914Colonial Possessions, 1914

Fig. 8-4: By the outbreak of World War I, European states held colonies throughout the world, especially throughout Africa and in much of Asia.

Page 40: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Hitler and the Nazi Party’s Rise to Power in Germany

• With the rise of the Nazi party to power in the 1930’s Adolf Hitler finds that the world has almost been completely colonized– Germany lost all of its African colonies in WWI

• Hitler has a bright idea “let’s colonize Europe”

Page 41: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Using the idea of Aryan racial superiority Hitler colonizes Europe through lebensraum “living space”

Page 42: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Hitler/Nazi’s decide to colonize white people in the heart of Europe

Page 43: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Questioning the legitimacy of Western colonization (Centrifugal)

• World War II fought in part in the name of “self-determination of peoples” and defeat of attempt to create a racist Nazi Empire in the heart of Europe by colonizing white people

• Perhaps if colonizing white people is wrong this applies to other colors of people as well?

• Dutch, and especially French, learn nothing from this lesson and try to re-colonize Asia and Africa

• Emergence of National Liberation Movements throughout the colonized world

Page 44: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The Colonies of the World, 1945

Page 45: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The UN and Decolonization

• 1945 1/3 of world’s population are “non-self governing peoples” i.e. “colonized”

• Article IX “sacred trust the obligation to promote” the “well-being” colonized people

• And to “to develop self-government ” meaning eventual independence

• 1960 Declaration of Rights of Colonized Peoples• 1962 Special Committee on Decolonization• Under UN direction 80 colonies become

independent states/countries

Page 46: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Types of Decolonization• Some colonies gained their independence

through peaceful negotiation– British withdrawal from India/Pakistan 1947

• Others only achieved independence through long and bloody anti-colonial wars of “national liberation”

• Indonesian Revolution (1949 Dutch)• Vietnamese Revolution (1954 French)• Mau Mau Rebellion Kenya (1960 British)• Algerian War of Independence (1962

French)

Page 47: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

National Liberation Movements in Vietnam and Algeria

Page 48: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Asian Decolonization

Page 49: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

African Decolonization

Page 50: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The World Today: A Consolidation of the State-Centric System?

Page 51: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The World Today? Or is it? Sudan breaks apart 2011

Page 52: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Canada and Nunavut (1999)

Page 53: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Demark gives autonomy to Greenland (2008)

Page 54: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Fate of large multination states? Soviet Union Born:1917 Died1991

Page 55: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

What does the future hold for large multi-nation states like Indonesia?

• Born: 1948-?

Page 56: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Or Nigeria? Born:1960-?

Page 57: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Or India? Born: 1947-? Or…..????

Page 58: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Peoples Republic of China b. 1948-?

Page 59: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Indigenous peoples were here long before states, colonies, or empires

Page 60: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Indigenous and Colonized Peoples Perspective of State-Centrism

• From the perspective of peoples like the Kurds, Australian Aborigines, Mayans, San Bushmen, Basques, and many others

• Who have lived in their territories for thousands or tens of thousands of years

• The state-centric system seems quite NEW in terms of time AND

• Quite TRANSITIORY and EPHEMERAL in terms of human (not state) HISTORY.

Page 61: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The San of the Kalahari Desert

• World’s oldest culture 80,000 years old

• Living in newly created states of

• Botswana b. 1966 Namibia b. 1990

Page 62: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 63: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

"Central Kalahari Game Reserve"

• In 1961 Botswana created a park called the "Central Kalahari Game Reserve“

• In the mid-1990s a large diamond bearing field was discovered on San land

• In 1997 Botswana declared that no human would be allowed to live in the park

• Botswana began relocating the entire San population to a concentration camp called “New Xade”

Page 64: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations
Page 65: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

New Xade 140 km from the San’s traditional homeland

Page 66: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

A 47 year old state is currently destroying the world’s oldest culture• The Botswana government argues that the

game reserve is for animals only• No hunting is allowed though the San have

hunted these lands for 1000s of years• The Botswana Board of Tourism encourages

eco-safaris to the park as a form of tourist/foreign revenue

• Tourists are allowed in the park, but not the San

Page 67: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

http://www.botswanatourism.co.bw/

ckgr.php

Page 68: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The Modern State System and Indigenous Peoples

• Unfortunately when indigenous peoples confront modern states like the San they rarely win those confrontations

• Where the San are forced to live today

Page 69: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The Auto-Imperialist State

• After the United Nations creates states like Botswana and Namibia…

• Their “job” is to go to territories like the San’s and take their land away from them

• This is a state being imperialistic towards indigenous peoples inside of their territory

• This is viewed as legitimate and lawful by the state-centric system

• This is usually done in the name of “economic development” or “modernization”

Page 70: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

The Indigenous Response to the Auto-Imperialistic State

• Some indigenous people have the ability to resist A-I state attempts to steal their land and actually defend themselves

• This can be seen in many places around the world today, where indigenous peoples are challenging the authority of A-I states

• Dinka, Fur, Nuba “Southern Sudan”• Kurds of Northern Iraq/NE Syria• Abkhaz in Western Georgia• Chechens in Russia until genocide of 1999

Page 71: Tomas Hopkins Primeau Professor of International Relations

Pockets of Indigenous Resistance to the state-centric system