trends in cataloging & metadata
DESCRIPTION
Free Webinar for UW-Madison School of Library & Information Studies, Continuing Education, March 14, 2013TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 1
Trends in cataloging & metadataMarch 14, 2013
presented by: Debra Shapirofor:
UW-Madison SLIS CEShttp://www.slis.wisc.edu/continueed.htm
![Page 2: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 2
![Page 3: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 3
Some of the things…•We thought would save us:
• Cataloging Internet resources
•& making huge adaptations of MARC
• FRBR
• RDA
• Transitioning away from MARC to …
• Linked data?
![Page 4: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 4
Poll1. How many of you are implementing RDA?
• right now, as we speak
• soon, but still waiting to see what others do
• no implementation plan
2. How many of you currently create a significant amount of non-MARC metadata - e.g. Dublin Core, EAD, MODS?
• yes, we do that a lot
• no, none or almost none
![Page 5: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 5
![Page 6: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 6
![Page 7: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 7
![Page 8: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
•Entity Relationship Model, but also
•FRBR user tasks:
• to find;
• to identify;
• to select;
• to acquire or obtain access
FRBR
![Page 9: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 9
![Page 10: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 10
Coyle – FRBR as cake, 1
![Page 11: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 11
Coyle, FRBR as cake, 2
![Page 12: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 12
Coyle, FRBR as cake, 3
![Page 13: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
“In the final analysis, the RDA Test Coordinating Committee recommended that the national libraries adopt RDA with certain conditions and that implementation will not occur before January 1, 2013.”
Meh
![Page 14: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 14
What happened to find, identify, select,obtain?
![Page 16: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 16
![Page 17: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Dis-aggregated cataloging
• Distinguish between RDA the cataloging rules; tool for catalogers; and
• RDA – the new model for library data (linked data)
• Broad agreement after testing –
• MARC & RDA = not a happy match!
Implications of RDA
![Page 18: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 18
![Page 19: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 19
![Page 20: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 20
![Page 21: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 21
![Page 22: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 22
How do we create this brave new metadata??
•No “hand-hewn” records•No “entry screen” in BIBFRAME•BIBFRAME experiments to date use existing MARC data, and dumping it in
![Page 23: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 23
![Page 24: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 24
To recap•Tried to get the Internet into the Library Catalog
•Had our bibliographic data try on fancy information models & let it flirt with other metadata schemes
•Got our bibliographic data all gussied up and looking pretty good –
•BUT – still wearing 50-year-old underwear!!
•It’s time to release the bibliographic data from the library catalog, and let it out on the web to play with new friends
![Page 26: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 26
Resources•Coyle, Karen. 2012. Linked data tools: connecting on the Web. Chicago, IL: ALA TechSource. Library technology reports, v. 48, no. 4.
•IFLA FRBR FAQ http://www.ifla.org/node/949
•OCLC FRBR algorithm http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/frbralgorithm.html
•Executive summary: Report & Recommendations of the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee June 2011
•RDA chapter 0, 0.6.0 – 0.6.9
•Karen Coyle, FRBR as cake
![Page 27: Trends in Cataloging & Metadata](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/55506709b4c905c0448b54bf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
University of Wisconsin–Madison 27
Resources•OCLC RDA policy - https://www.oclc.org/en-US/rda/new-policy.html
•Metadata registry - http://metadataregistry.org/
•VIAF - http://viaf.org/
•loc.id - http://id.loc.gov/
•Celestial Eyes http://blogs.princeton.edu/graphicarts/2010/05/celestial_eyes.html
•BIBFRAME - http://bibframe.org/
•Schema.org - http://schema.org/
•Roy Tennant, Cataloging Unchained - http://youtu.be/IQRHNdw2_yw