UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Innovation Ltd. Boundary work in deliberative governance in land use planning

Metze, T.A.P.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Metze, T. A. P. (2010). Innovation Ltd. Boundary work in deliberative governance in land use planning. Delft:Eburon Academic Publishers.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 30 May 2020

References

209

references

a1 aantekeningen hofstede (1997). Aantekeningen van Hans Hofstede (ambtenaar REO stadsdeel ZO).afdeling so/ vh, g.a. (1990). Nr. 891: De toekomst van de Bijlmermeer. Amsterdam: besluit raad, conform besloten.afdeling onderzoek en statistiek (oens) (2004). Kerncijfers stadsdeel Zuidoost. Amsterdam.agrologistiek magazine (2009). Je moet er als de kippen bij zijn: Innovatie over de Eiwitsnelweg. Agrologistiek Magazine, issue 2009:pp.16-17.alterra (2007). Evaluatie reconstructie van zandgebieden, 27 September Press- release. Wageningen.amengual, m. and d. Laws (2004). Analysis of the development of the Dairy Gateway and Green Tier.Cambridge: MIT Department of Urban studies and Planning.amengual, m. (2005). Flexibility with accountability: an experiment in environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT.andersen, i. e . and jaeger, B. (1999). Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Toward more democratic decision- making. Science and Public Policy, 26 (5): pp. 331-340.apps, j. (2005). Every farm tells a story: A tale of family farm values. Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Pressarendt, r. g. (1996). Conservation design for subdivisions: A practical guide to creating open space networks. Washington D.C.: Island Pressarendt, r. g. (1999). Growing greener: Putting conservation into local plans and ordinances. Washington D.C.: Island Pressaristotle (1976). The nicomachean ethics. Harmonswirth: Penguin.argyris, c. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: individual and organizational. San Fransisco, Jossey-Bass.argyris, c., and donald schön (1978). Learning: A theory of action perspective reading. Boston, MA, Addison-Wesley.armour, a. (1995). The citizens’ model of public participation: A critical evaluation. In:Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. (eds.), Fairness and competence in citizens participation. London: Kluwer Academic Publisherashmore, m. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Pressasselt, m. B. a. v. and rijkens- klomp, n. (2002). A look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change, 12 (3): pp. 167-184.ato (associatie technologie overdracht): goossens, t., van wagenberg, c., rienks, w., Bethe, f., vedder, h., Backus, p, simons, a. (2003). Visieontwikkeling A1 corridor: Op weg naar een nieuwe agrostructuur. Wageningen: ATO B.V.ato (associatie technologie overdracht): smeets, p. a. s., goossens, t., rienks, w., van wagenberg, c. and Bethe, f. (2003). Visieontwikkeling A1 corridor: Op weg naar een nieuwe agrocluster. Wageningen: Alterra, ATO, PLATO.B1 12 teisman, g. r. (1998). Extra documentatie bij offerte creatieve concurrentie t.b.v. raadsleden stadsdeel Zuidoost Amsterdam.B1 13 Brief (1998). Brief van stichting Bijlmerpark Natúúrlijk. Amsterdam.

References

210

References

211

Bohman, j. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Boltanski, L. and thevenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2 (3): pp. 359-377.Boonstra, f. g., w. kuindersma, h. Bleumink, s. de Boer, en a. m. e. groot, (2007). Van varkenspest tot integrale gebiedsontwikkeling: Evaluatie van de reconstructie zandgebieden. Wageningen: Alterra.Bouwen, r. and t. taillieu (2004). Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14(3): pp.137-153.Brink, g. van de (1996). Woensel 1670-1920: De grote overgang. Nijmegen: SUN.Brink, m. van de (2009). Rijkswaterstaat on the horns of a dilemma. Delft: Eburon.Brink, m. van de, and t. metze (eds.) (2006). Words matter in policy and planning: Discourse theory and method in the social sciences. Utrecht: KNAG/NETHURBröer, c. (2006). Beleid vormt overlast. Amsterdam: Aksant.Broeze, j. (2003a). Position paper 1: Een visie op agrologistiek rondom de A1 eiwitcorridor: Agroproductie in een regionale en mondiale context. Wageningen: WUR.Broeze, j. (2003b). Position paper 2: Een visie op agrologistiek rondom de eiwit- corridor A1: Beelden van agrologistieke innovaties. Wageningen: WUR.Bruijne, d., van hoogstraten, d., kwekkeboom, w., Luijten, a. (2002). Amsterdam Zuidoost/ Amsterdam Southeast: Centrumgebied Zuidoost en stedelijke vernieuwing Bijlmermeer 1992-2010. Hilversum: Thoth.Bruin, j. a. d., e. f. ten heuvelhof, & r. j. in ’t veld, (1998). Procesmanagement: Over procesontwerp en besluitvorming. Schoonhoven: Academic Service.Bulkeley, h. and a. p. j. mol (2003). Participation and environmental change. Environmental values, 12 (2): pp. 143-154.Bunt, van de, en rijnconsult (2003). Offerte project Protein Highway: Make it Happen. In opdracht van Oost NV, Provincie Overijssel, Provincie Gelderland en Innovatienetwerk.Butler, j. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Butler, j. (1999). Bodies that matter. In: Price, J. and M. Shildrick M. (eds.), Feminist theory and the body: A reader. New York: Routledge.callon, m. (1986). Some elements of sociological translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fischermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 169-233) London: Routledge and Paul Kegan.carlile, p.r. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13 (4): pp. 433-455.caron- flintrman, j. f., j. e. w. Broerse, j. teerling, m.L.y van alst, s. klaasen, L. e. swart and j. f. g. Bunders (2006). Stakeholder participation in health research agendasetting: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Science and Public Policy, 33 (4): pp. 291-304.carson, L.h.k. (2005). Adapting and combining deliberative designs: Juries, polls and forums. In Levine, J.G.P. (ed.), The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies foreffective civic engagement in the 21st century (pp. 120-138). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.carter, n. (2007). The politics of the environment: Ideas, activism, policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

B1 16 Brief (1998). Brief F. Boerwinkel. Amsterdam.B1 21 (2000). Brief van projectcoördinator Hans Hofstede aan Jan Verheijden (hoofd REO). Amsterdam: stadsdeel Zuidoost. B2 31 (2000). Brief van de Stad bv aan Henk Lutchman. Amsterdam.B3 (2000). Brief van de Stad bv aan Mevrouw van Leeuwen, hoofd REO stadsdeel Zuidoost. Amsterdam.B3 1 (2001). Brief van de Stad bv aan Dhr. Zwanborn, hoofd REO. Amsterdam.Bal, r. and halffman, w. (eds) (1998). The politics of chemical risk: Scenario’s for a regulatory future. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Bal, r., w. e. Bijker, and r. hendriks (2002). Honderd jaar Gezondheidsraad VI.Coördinatiemechanismen en het gezag van de Gezondheidsraad.Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 146: 1996-2000.Barkley, d. L. and m. s. henrey (1997). Rural industrial development: To cluster or not to cluster? Review of Agricultural Economics, 19 (2): pp.308-325.Barth, f. (2000). Boundaries and connections. In Cohen, A.P. (ed.), Signifying identities: Antropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values (pp. 17-36). London: Routledge.Beck, u. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Toward a theory of reflexive modernization. In Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 1-55). Cambridge: Polity Press.Beierle, t. and koninsky, d. (2000). Values, conflict and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of policy analysis and management, 19 (4): pp. 587-602.Bekkers, v. and edwards, a. (2007a). Legitimacy and democracy: a conceptual framework for assessing governance practice. In Bekkers, V.J.J.M., G. Bekkers, A. Edwards,and M. Fenger,(eds.), Governance and the democratic deficit: assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practice(pp. 35-61). Hamshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Bekkers, v., dijkstra, g. and m. fenger (2007b). Governance and the democratic deficit: assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practice. Hamshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Benhabib, s. (1988). Judgment and the moral foundations of politics in Arendt’s thought. Political Theory, 16 (1): pp. 29-51.Benhabib, s. (ed.) (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Berry, j. m., k. e. portney and k. thomson (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington D.C.: The Brookings InstitutionBessette, j. m. (1994). The mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy and American national government. Chicago: The University of Chicago PressBieleman, j. (2000). Landbouw. Zutphen: Walburg Pers.Bieleman, j. (2008). Boeren in Nederland: Geschiedenis van de landbouw 1500-2000. Amsterdam: Boom.Bijker, w. (1995). Democratisering van de Technologische Cultuur. Inaugurele Rede, Maastricht, Universiteit van MaastrichtBijker, w., r. Bal, and r. hendriks (eds.) (2009). The paradox of scientific authority: The role of scientific advice in democracies, Inside Technologies Series, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

References

212

References

213

dewey, j. (1939). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.dewey, j. (1984 [1939]). Search for the public. In Boydston, J.A. (ed.), John Dewey: The later works (pp. 238-358). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.dijstelbloem, h. (2007). Democatie anders: Politieke vernieuwing volgens Dewey en Latour. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.dnr (2003). Grant application Joyce foundation. Madison.dnr (2007). Newsrelease: Dairy Business Association signs Green Tier charter with department of Natural Resources. Madison: DNRdnr cea (2004). Dairy Gateway Report. Madison, Wisconsin.dnr cea (2004). Green tier decision making work-plan: For Wisconsin Act 276 (Green Tier). Madison.dnr cea (2004b). Attachment B, DG report: Scope of the work grant NMD 503. Madison, WI: LNRPdnr cea (2004c). Attachment C: Scope of work, expanding local involvement in Dairy Gateway (Grant NMD652). Madison.dnr cea (2004d). Attachment D: Investors Club. Wisconsin: LNRP.dnr cea (2004e). Joyce foundation grant application second year funding request for Dairy Gateway. Madison: DNR, DATCP and Wisconsin Stewardship Initiative. dnr cea (2006). Recommendations: Agriculture sector’s involvement in Green Tier from the agriculture convening group to Wisconsin department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer protection and Wisconsin Department of natural resources. In DNR (ed.), Geen tier biennial progress report. Madison, Wisconsindnr Lnrp (2004). Section 5 DG report: Ranked policy issues at local stakeholder meeting preparation for statewide convening. Madisondodge, j. (2009). Environmental justice and deliberative democracy: How social change organizations respond to power in the deliberative system. Policy and Society, 28 (3): pp. 225-239.dryzek, j. (1982). Policy analysis as hermeneutic activity. Policy Sciences, 14(4): pp 309-329.dryzek, j. (1990). Policy sciences of democracy: Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pressdryzek, j. (2000a). Discursive democracy versus liberal constitutionalism. In Saward, M. (ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 77- 89). London: Routledge.dryzek, j. (2000b). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.dryzek, j. (2001). Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29 (5): pp. 651-669.dryzek, j. (2006). Deliberative global politics: Discourse and democracy in a divided world. Cambridge: Polity Press.durant, j. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding science. Science and Public Policy, 26 (5): pp.313-319.dyvendak, j. w. and a. krouwel (2001). Interactieve beleidsvorming: voortzetting van een rijke Nederlandse traditie? In Edelenbos, J. and R. Monnikhof, R. (eds.), Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming: Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie (pp. 17-32). Utrecht: Lemma.

castells, m. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.cda (1990, herzien). Program van uitgangspunten. Den Haag: CDA.christiano, t. (1996). Deliberative Equality and the democratic order. In: Shapiro, I. &hardin, r. (eds.). Political order: Nomos 38 (pp. 251-288). New York: New York University Press.cohen, j. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Hamlin, A. and P. Petit. (ed.), The good policy (pp. 17-34). Oxford: Blackwell Publicationcohen, j. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics (67-92). Cambridge: MIT Presscollins, h. m. and evans r. (2002). The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32 (2): pp. 235-296.cozzens, s. e. and e. j. woodhouse (1995). Science, government and the politics of knowledge. In Jasanoff, S., G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, and T. Pinch (eds.). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 533-553). Thousand Oaks: Sagecrosby, n. (1995). Citizens juries: One solution for difficult environmental questions. In Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. (eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation (pp. 157-174). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.dammers, e., f. verwest, B. staffhorst and w. verschoor (2004). Ontwikkelingsplanologie: lessen uit en voor de praktijk. Den Haag: Ruimtelijk Planbureau.darnall, n. and carmin, j. (2005). Greener and cleaner?: The signalling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. Policy sciences, 38 (2-3): pp. 71-90. daugbjerg, c. (1998). Policy networks under pressure: Pollution control, policy reform and the power of farmers. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Company.de vries, a., w. halffman and r. hoppe. (2010 forthcoming). Policy workers tinkering with uncertainty: Dutch econometric policy advice in action. In Colebatch, H.K., R. Hoppe and M. Noordegraaf (eds.), Working for policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.de wilt, i. j. (30-11-2004). Interview Jan de Wilt Innovatienetwerk.de wit, a. j. f. (2005). De methodologie van grenswerk. Den Haag: RMNO.dewulf, a., m. craps and g. dercon (2004). How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: A multi-level analysis of a collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14(3): 177-192.dean, m. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.delmas, m. and a. keller (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA Waste Wise program. Policy sciences, 38 (2): pp. 91-106.delmas, m. a. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy sciences, vol. 35 (1): pp. 91-119.design team dairy gateway project (2004a). Dairy Gateway Objective: Overview of process, Wisconsin.design team dairy gateway project (2004b). Dairy Gateway: Statewide consensus based policymaking. Cambridge/ Madison: MIT, Susan Podziba & Associates.dewey, j. (1933). Experience and education. New York: MacMillan.

References

214

References

215

fischer, f. (1999). Technological deliberation in a democratic society: The case for participatory inquiry. Science and Public Policy, 26 (5): pp. 294-302.fischer, f. (2000). Citizens, experts and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham & London: Duke University Press.fischer, f. (2003). Beyond empiricism: Policy analysis as deliberative practice. In Hajer, M.A. and H. Wagenaar (eds.), Deliberative policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.fischer, f, and j. forester (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL Press.fischer, r. and shapiro, d. (2005). Beyond reason: Using emotions as you negotiate. New York: Viking Penguinfischer, r. and w. ury (1981). Getting to yes. Cambridge: Harvardfish, r., s. seymour and c. watkins (2006). Sustainable farmland management as political and cultural discourse. The Geographical Journal, 172 (3): pp. 183-189.fishkin, j. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Pressfishkin, j. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press. fishkin, j. (1996). The televised deliberative poll: An experiment in democracy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546 (The Media and Politics): pp. 132-140flynn, t. r. (2002). Review: Fearless speech. Notre Dame philosophical reviews. Retrieved from http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=1223flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers of civil society. British Journal of Sociology, 49 (2): pp. 210-233.flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social sciences matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.forester, j. (1996). Beyond Dialogue to transformative learning: How deliberative rituals encourage political judgment in community planning processes. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and Humanities, 46, 295-333.forester, j. (2000). The deliberative practitioner. Cambridge, US: MIT.forester, j. (2004). Responding to critical moments with humor, recognition and hope. Negotiations Journal, April 2004: pp. 221-237.forester, j. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. New York: Oxford University Press.foucault, m. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. In: Burchell, G., C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 53-72).London: Harvester Wheatscheaf.foucault, m. (2001). Fearless speech. Los Angeles: semiotext(e).fraser, n. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge: MIT Press.freidson, e. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.freidson, e. (1986). Professional powers: A study of institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.fuller, L. (1971). Mediation: Its forms and functions. Southern California Law Review, 44: pp. 305- 339.

ec (european council) (1996). Council directive:Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control No. Directive 96/61/EC, Brussels.echo (2000a). Hannah Belliot redt de avond: Bijlmerbewoners kritisch tijdens werkconferentie herinrichting Bijlmerpark. Echo 31 Mei 2000, Amsterdam.echo (2000b). Toekomstig Bijlmerpark moet wel herkenbaar zijn voor bewoners: Slechte communicatie en taalhantering maakt bewoners wrevelig. Echo, 17 Mei 2000, Amsterdam.edelenbosch, j. (2001). Interactieve beleidsvorming als inhoudsabsorberend proces. Bestuurskunde, 10 (8): pp. 349-356.edelenbosch, j. en r. monnikhof (1998a). Identiteitscrisis bij interactieve beleidsvorming. Binnenlands Bestuur, 50 (december): pp. 24-25.edelenbosch, j. en r. monnikhof (1998b). Naar een hybride democratie?: Spanningen tussen interactieve beleidsvorming en het vertegenwoordigende stelsel. In Edelenbosch, J. & Monnikhof. R. (eds.), Spanning in interactie (pp. 9-48). Amsterdam: Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek. edelenbosch. j. and monnikhof, r. (2001). Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming: een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie. Utrecht: Lemma.eeten, m. j. g. v. (1999). Dialogues of the deaf on science in policy controversies.Science and Public Policy, 26 (3): pp. 185-192.eisterhold, j., s. attardoa and d. Boxera (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8): pp. 1239-1256.elster, j. (ed.) (1998). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.e m 2-2 (2000). Email van Geert Timmermans (Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening (DRO)) aan DRO, Amsterdam.email john shenot (12 december 2007). Email Shenot dec2 007. Madison, Wisconsin. email john shenot (10 august 2010). Email Shenot aug 2010. Madison, Wisconsinems- meeting (2005). EMS meeting Cleveland: transcript 3. In Metze, T. (ed.), Cleveland, WI: DATCP and DNRepstein, s. (1993). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California.epstein, s. (1995). The construction of lay- expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Value, 20 (4): pp. 408-437.f1-1 fax (1998). Faxbericht van Jan Verheijden betreft wijzigingen in offerte voor startnotitie van de Stad bv. Amsterdam: stadsdeel Zuidoost.fairclough, n. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2): pp. 163-168.farm act (2002). Farm security and rural investment act of 2002. Washington: USDAfarmer to farmer meeting (2004). Farmer to farmer meeting, transcript 1, Casco, Wisconsin.fax 2-1 (2000). Fax van DRO aan de Stad bv. Amsterdam: DRO.finlayson, i. (2005). Toward sustainable land stewardship: Reframing development in Wisconsin Dairy Gateway. Cambridge: MIT.fischer, f. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. New Bury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

References

216

References

217

grin, j. and h. van de graaf, (1996a). Technology assessment as learning. Science, Technology & Human Value, 21(1): pp.72-99.grin, j. and h. van de graaf (1996b). Implementation as communicative action. Policy Sciences, 29 (), 291-319.grin, j. and a. van staveren(2007). Werken aan systeeminnovaties: Lessen uit de praktijk. Assen: Van Gorcum.grudens – schuck, n. (2000). Conflict and engagement: an empirical study of a farmer extension partnership in a sustainable agriculture program. Journal of Argicultural and Environmental Ethics, 13 (1-2): pp. 79-100.grunn, s. (2006). From hegemony to governmentality: changing conceptions of power in social history. Journal of Social History, Spring, 705-720.guba, e.g. and y.s. Lincoln (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newburry Park: Sage Publications.gunsteren, h. van, e. van ruyven (1993). De ongekende samenleving (DOS). Beleid en Maatschappij, 3, 114-203.guston, d. h. (1999a). Evaluating the first US consensus conference: The impact of the citizens’ panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science Technology & Human Values, 24(4): pp. 451-482.guston, d. h. (1999b). Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29 (1): pp. 87-111.gutmann, a. and d. thompson (1996). Democracy & disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.habermas, j. (1980). Discourse ethics: Notes on philosophical justification. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: MIT Press.hagendijk, r. p. (1996). Wetenschap, constructivisme en cultuur. Amsterdam: Luna Negra.hajer, m. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43-76). London: UCL Press Limited.hajer, m. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy processes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.hajer, m. a. (2003). Policy without polity?: Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36 (2): pp. 175-195.hajer, m. a. (2005). Setting the stage: A dramaturgy of policy deliberation. Administration and Society, 36 (6), 624- 647hajer, m. a. (2006). The living institutions of the EU: Analyzing governance as performance. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7 (1): pp. 41-55.hajer, m. a. (2009). Authoritative governance: policy- making in the age of mediazation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.hajer, m. a. and d. Laws (2006). Ordering through discourse. In Moran, M., M. Rein and R.E. Goodin (eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.hajer, m. a., j. van tatenhove and c. Laurent (2004). Nieuwe vormen van governance: Een essay over nieuwe vormen van bestuur met een empirische uitwerking naar de domeinen van voedselveiligheid en gebiedsgericht beleid. Amsterdam:Onderzoeksteam Perform/ ASSR, Universiteit van Amsterdam.hajer, m. a. and j. uitermark (2008). Performing authority: Discursive politics after

fung, a. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33 (2): pp. 397-419.fung, a. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 36 (s1): pp. 65-74.fung, a. and e. wright. (2003a). Thinking about empowered participatory governance. In Fung, A. and Wright, E. (eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovation in empowered participatory governance (pp. 3-42). London: Verso.fung, a. and e. wright (eds.) (2003b). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovation in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.funtowicz, s. and a. Liberatore (2003). ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: What does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy, 30 (3): pp. 146-150.funtowicz, s. and j.r. ravetz (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post normal science. In: Krimsky, S. & Golding, D. (eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251-274). Wesport: Praeger. funtowicz, s. and j. ravetz (2003). Science for the post normal age. Futures, 25 (7): pp.735-755.gastil, j. and p. Levine (eds.) (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty first century. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.gibbons, m. (2000). Mode 2 society and the emergence of context sensitive science. Science and Public Policy, 27(3): pp. 159-163.gibbons, m., c. Limoges, h. nowotny, s. schwartzman, p. scott and m. trow (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage Publicationsgieryn, t. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non- science: Strains and interests in the professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6): pp. 781-795.gieryn, t. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: Chicago University Press.gilbert, g. and m. mulkay (1982). Warranting scientific belief. Social Studies of Science, 12 (3): pp. 383-408.gilbert, g. and m. mulkay (1984). Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.glynos, j. and d. howarth (2007). Logica of critical explanations in social and political theory. London & New York: Routledge.gom (gelderse ontwikkelings maatschappij) (2003, january 28). 28 Januari 2003 Verslag Huis Nieuwe Rande. Deventer/Diepeveen.gom (gelderse ontwikkelings maatschappij) (2003, june 6). 6 Juni 2003 Verslag Huis Nieuwe Rande. Deventer/Diepeveen.goodin, r. e. (2003). Reflective democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.goodin, r. e. (2006). Innovating democracy: Democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. New York: Oxford University Press.goodman, d. (1999). Agro- food studies in the ‘Age of Ecology’: Nature, corporeality, biopolitics. Sociologia Ruralis, 39 (1): pp. 17-38.goodman, r. (1973). After the planners. Clearwater, Florida: Touchstone.gottweis, h. (2006). Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos and pathos. In Fischer, F., G. J. Miller, M.S. Sidney (eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods (pp. 223-236). Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group

References

218

References

219

Amsterdam University Press.hendriks, f. en. p. tops (2001). Interactieve beleidsvorming en betekenisverlening. Interpretaties van een pluriforme praktijk. Beleid en Maatschappij 28(2): pp. 106-119.higley, c. j., f. convery and f. Lévêque (eds.) (2001). Voluntary environmental approaches: Research insights for policy- makers. Paris: Centre d’Economie Industrielle, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Paris.hisschemöller, m. and r. hoppe (2001). Coping with intractable controversies. In: Hisschemöller, M., R. Hoppe, W.N. Dunn and J.R. Ravetz (eds.), Democratic expertise: Integrating knowledge, power and participation (pp. 47-72). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.hisschemöller, m., r. hoppe, w. n. dunn and j. r. ravetz (eds.) (2001). Democratic expertise: Integrating knowledge, power and participation. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.hodges, r. (2005). Introduction. In: Hodges, R. (ed.), Governance and the public sector. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.hoedemakers, m. L. (2007). Design for the renewal of the Bijlmer Park (summary). Amsterdam: Mecanoo Architects.hofstede, h. (1997). Scenario’s ideeënontwikkeling (ambtelijk document). Amsterdam: stadsdeel Zuidoost.holmquest, a. (1990). The rhetorical strategy of boundary work. Argumentation, 4 (3): pp. 235-258.holsum dairies (2006). Annual report on Green Tier. Hilbert: Wisconsinhood, c. (1998). The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.hootsen, c. L. (2006). Ontwerp tegen sociale onveiligheid in de Bijlmermeer: Bouwkundige maatregelen tegen criminaliteit en onveiligheidsgevoelens in en rond hoogbouwflats. Masters: Universiteit van Amsterdam. hoppe, r. (2002). Rethinking the puzzles of science- policy nexus: Boundary traffic, boundary work and the mutual transgression between STS and Policy Studies. In:EASST, Responsibility under uncertainty, 31 July- 3 August 2002. York.hoppe, r. (2005). Rethinking the science- policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to boundary arrangements. Poiesis and Praxis, vol. 3,199-215.hoppe, r. (2008). Strategic advice and public policy: Expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work. Poiesis and Praxis: International journal for technology assessment and ethics of science. 6, 235-263howarth, d. r., y. stravrakakis and a. j. norval (eds.) (2000). Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.hulst, m. van (2008). Quite an experience: Using ethnography to study local governance. Critical Policy Analysis, 2 (2): pp. 143-159.indyk, d. and rier, d. a (1993). Grassroots AIDS Knowledge: implications for the boundaries of science and collective action. Knowledge: Creation, diffusion, utilization, 15 (1): pp. 3-43innis, j. e. and d. e. Booher (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 65 (4): pp. 412-423.innes, j. e. and d. e. Booher (2000). Network power in collaborative planning.

the assassination of Theo van Gogh. Public Administration, 86 (1): pp. 5-19.hajer, m. a. and w. versteeg (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3): pp. 175-184.hajer, m. a. and h. wagenaar (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.halffman, w. (2003). Boundaries of regulatory science. Boechhout: Albatros.halffman, w. (2005). Science- policy boundaries: National styles? Science & Public Policy, 32 (6): pp. 457- 467.halffman, w. and r. hoppe (2005). Science/ policy boundaries: A changing division of labor in Dutch expert policy advice. In: Maasse, S. and P. Weingart (eds.), Scientific expertise and political decision making (pp. 135-152). Dordrecht: Kluwer.hall, c., a. mcvittie and d. moran (2004). What does the public want form agriculture and the countryside?: A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 20 (2): pp. 211-225.hanley, n. (2001). Policy on agricultural pollution in the European Union. In: Shortle, J. S. and D.G. Abler (eds.), Environmental policies for agricultural pollution control (pp.151- 162). Glasgow: CABI Publishing, University of Glasgow.harraway, d. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.harré, r. and L. van Langenhove (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In: Harré, R. en L. van Langenhove, L. (eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14-31).Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.hasset, s. (state secretary) (2003). Speech at the 15th annual Environmental Law Update. Waukesha, Wisonsin: The state bar of Wisconsin.healey, p. (1988). Land use planning and the mediation of urban change: The British planning system in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.healey, p. (1997a). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave, Basingstoke: Blackwell Publishers.healey, p. (1997b). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. In: Campbell, S. and S. Fainstein (eds), Readings in planning theory (pp. 234-257). Blackwell: Blackwell Publishers.heijden, k. van de (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversations. Southern Gate, Chistester: John Wiley and Sons ltd, The atrium.held, d. (1999). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.helleman, g.v. and f. wassenberg (2001). De Bijlmermeer: De stad van morgen wordt verleden tijd. Geografie, December, pp. 24-28.helleman, g.v. and wassenberg, f. (2004). The renewal of what was tomorrow’s idealistic city: Amsterdam’s Bijlmermeer high-rise. Cities, 21, 3-17.hellstrom, t. and m. jacobs (2003). Boundary organizations in science: from discourse to construction. Science and Public Policy, 30(4): pp. 235-238.hendriks, c. m. (2005). Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums. Policy sciences, 38, 1-20.hendriks, c. m. (2006). When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics & Society, 34, 571-602.hendriks, c. m. (2009). Deliberative governance in the context of power. Policy and Society, 28(3): pp. 173-184.hendriks, f. (2006). Vitale democratie: theorie van democratie in actie. Amsterdam:

References

220

References

221

interview verheijden, j. (2003). Interview Verheijden 2003, voormalig hoofd sector REO stadsdeel Zuidoost. Amsterdam.interview wallander, a. and j. keunigs (2004). Interview October 26 2004 Wallander, A. (county conservationist Kewaunee) and J. L. Keunigs (Agricultural Agent, University of Wisconsin Extension Kewaunee).Kewaunee, Wisconsin. interview miller, m. (2005). Interview October 10 2005 Senator Mark Miller (democrats). Madison, Wisconsin. janssen- jansen, L. (2004). Regio’s uitgedaagd: Growth management ter inspiratie voor nieuwe paden voor proactieve ruimtelijke planning. Assen: Van Gorcum.jasanoff, s. (1987). Contested science in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17 (2): pp. 195-230.jasanoff, s. (1994). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.jasanoff, s. (2004). Science and citizenship: A new synergy. Science and Public Policy, 31 (2): pp. 90-94 (5).joyce foundation (2003). State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved from: http://www.joycefdn.org/GrantList/GrantDetails.aspx?grantId=25929. joyce foundation (2005). Wisconsin Agricultural Stewardship initiative: all in the water Retrieved from: http://www.joycefdn.org/content.cfm/all-in-the-waterkarapetrovic, s. and w. willborn (1998). Integration of quality and environmental management systems. The TQM Magezine, 10(3): pp. 204-213.karl, h. a. and c. e. turner (2003). Incorporating science into decision-making. Science, 300(5624): p. 1370.kei centrum (2008). Amsterdam Zuid Oost de Bijlmer. Retrieved from: http://www.kei-centrum.nl/view.cfm?page_id=1897&item_type=project&item_id=170kelly, k. (1998). New Rules for the New Economy: 10 ways the network economy is changing everything. London: Fourth Estate Limitedkewaunee- pro ag/ pro environment (2004). Pro Ag/ Pro environment meeting. Kewaunee: Transcript 2, Kewaunee, Wisconsin.kickert, w. (1993). Complexity, governance and dynamics: Conceptual explorations ofpublic network management. In Kooiman, J. (ed.), Modern governance (pp. 191-204).London: Sage.kickert, w. (2004). History of governance in the Netherlands: Continuity and exceptions. The Hague: Elsevier Overheid.kickert, w., e. h. klijn, and j. f. m. koppenjan (eds.) (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.kjær, a. m. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.klandermans, B. and s. goslinga (1996). Media discourse, movement publicity and the generation of collective action frames: Theoretical and empirical exercises in meaning construction. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. In: McAdam, D., J. McCarthy and M. Zald, Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings. Cambridge University Press: 312-337.kLict, chains, networks, clusters and information technology (kLict) (2004). Keten en netwerkkunde op koers: Eindrapportage vanhet project KLICT.klijn, e. h. and g. r. teisman (1991). Effective policy making in a multi- actor setting: Networks and steering. In: In ‘t Veld, R.J., C.J.A.M. Termeer, L. Schaap en M. van Twist, M. (eds.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal

Berkely: Institute of Urban and Regional Development.innes, j. e. and d. e. Booher (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In: Hajer and H. Wagenaar (eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis (pp. 33-59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.interview aluvihera, r. (2003). DRO planner, interview 8 September 2003. Amsterdam.interview Buxs, B. (2003). Hoofd REO Stadsdeel Zuidoost van 1992-1997, interview September 2003, Maastricht. interview canef, d. (2005). Interview Denny Canef 13-10-2005, River Alliance, Wisconsin. interview de jager, d. (2004). RE: Interview Dick de Jager, ambtenaar economische zaken provincie Gelderland, interview 1-12-2004, Den Bosch. interview de wilt, j. (2004). Interview 30-11-2004 Jan de Wilt Innovatienetwerk, Utrecht.interview eggert (2004). Interview November 2 2004 Thomas Eggert, DNR project care- taker, Madison,Wisconsin.interview folkerts (2004). RE: Interview 21-12-2004 Henk Folkerts, Rijnconsult. interview hanson, a. (2004). Interview November 1 2004 Andrew Hanson, attorney Midwest Environmental Advocates., Madison, Wisconsin.interview hoekmans, j. (2004). Interview Jan Hoekmans. Deventer: Oost NV. interview hoekmans, j. 2 (2005). Interview Jan Hoekmans II. Deventer: Oost NVinterview hofstede, h. (2003). Interview Hofstede ambtenaar Ruimtelijke en Economische Ontwikkeling (REO) stadsdeel Zuidoost, Amsterdam.interview janssen, r. (2003). Interview Janssen najaar 2003, Amersfoort.interview Lutchman, h. (2004). Interview Lutchman, projectleider Creatieve Concurrentie, Amsterdam: Bijlmer.interview mcdermid, m., dnr- cea (20-10-2004). Interview Mark McDermid 2004, bureau director DNR CEA. Madison WI. interview niles, d. (20-10-2004). Interview Don Niles, farmer en veterinary on dairy dreams. Wisconsin. interview o’dell (2005). Interview October 72005 Margareth O’Dell, Joyce Foundation. Chicago, IL.. interview roemaat ii (2006). Interview Jos Roemaat II, voorzitter Gelderse Land en Tuinbouw Organisatie, Arnhem.interview saris, j. (2003). Interview September 2003 Saris, projectleider Creatieve Concurrentie, Amsterdam: de Stad bv.interview shenot, j. (2004). Interview 1 December 20 J Shenot, DNR- CEA project manager Dairy Gateway, Bristol, UK. interview shenot, j. ii (2005). Interview 2 John Shenot DNR CEA project manager Dairy Gateway project, Madison, WI:DNR.interview skadden, n. (2004). Interview 1 October 29 2004 Skadden, mediator LNRP. Sturgeon Bay, WI. interview smoller, j. (2004). RE: Interview November 1 J. Smoller, special assistant to the State Secretary DNR. Madison, WI. interview terrell (2005). Interview October 10 2005 C. Terell, Sierra Club. Madison, Wisconsin. interview van waes, m. (2004). Interview 16 November 2004, M. van Waes, projectleider PH: MiH, Van de Bunt Consultants. Amsterdam.

References

222

References

223

Lnrp (2004d). Lakeshore natural resource partnership brochure. Algoma, Wisconsin.Lnrp (2004e). Proposal 1 of LNRP for FNM project to DNR, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. Lnrp (2004f). Proposal 2 of LNRP for grant division project to DNR, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin.Lnv, ministerie van (2003). Brief aan de tweede kamer. Den Haag: ministerie van LNV, directie Industrie en Handel. Lnv, ministerie van (2004a). Agenda voor een vitaal platteland. Den Haag: Ministerie van LNV.Lnv, ministerie van, en ministerie van v&w (2001). Visie Agrologistiek. Den Haag: Ministerie van LNV.Lnv, ministerie van (2004). Nederlandse agrocluster in kaart. Task Force Economie. Den Haag. Lnv,ministerie van, ministerie van vrom, en ministerie v&w (2004). Meerjarenprogramma Vitaal platteland (MJP).Loeber, a. (2004). Practical wisdom in the risk society: Methods and practice of interpretative analysis in questions of sustainable development. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Luijten, a. (1997). A barrel of contradictions: The dynamic history of the Bijlmermeer. Archis, 3, pp. 15-22.Lynch, m. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17, 26-54.m2-4 (2000). Memo van SFB en Delta- Roa. Amsterdam: SFB en Delta Roa.macintyre, a. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.mak, j. and j. van tatenhove (2006). Introduction: Informality in a future EU. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7 (1): pp. 1-7.mansbridge, j. (2007). ‘Deliberative democracy’ or ‘democratic deliberation’? In: Rosenberg, S.W. (ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 251-271) Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.marsden, t. (2004). The quest for Ecological Modernisation: Re-spacing rural development and agro- food studies. Sociologia Ruralis, 44 (2): pp.129-146.marsh, d. a. and r. a. w. rhodes (eds.) (1992). Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.mayer, i., e. m. van Bueren, p. w. g. Bots, and j. van der voort (2005). Collaborative decision making for sustainable urban renewal projects: a simulation-gaming approach. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and design, 32 (3): pp. 403-423.mcclelland, p.d. (1997). Sowing Modernity: America’s first agricultural revolution. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.mcLain, r. j. and r. g. Lee (1996). Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management, 20 (4): pp. 437-448.mea (2006). Pressrelease on Maple Leaf: Centerville CARES praises DNR decision to formally prosecute Maple Leaf Dairy. Madison, WI.mentzel, m. (1989). Bijlmermeer als grensverleggend ideaal? Delft:Delftse Universitaire Pers.mentzel. m. (1990). The birth of Bijlmermeer (1965): The origin and explanation of high-rise decision making. Journal of Housing and the Built environment, 5 (4): pp. 359-375.metcalf, p. (2001). Global ‘disjunctive’ and the ‘sites’ of anthropology. Cultural

steering (pp. 99- 112) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishersklijn, e. h. and j. f. m. koppenjan (1998). Tussen representatieve en directe democratie: interactieve besluitvorming en de ‘politiek’. Bestuurskunde, 7 (7): pp. 302-308.kolb, d.a. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. NJ: Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs.kooiman, j. (1993). Modern Governance: New government- society interactions. London: Sage.Lachapelle, p. r., s. f. mccool, and m. e. patterson (2003). Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a messy world. Society and Natural Resources, 16 (6): pp. 473-490.Laclau, e. (1990). New reflections on the revolutions of our time. London: Verso.Laclau, e. (1996). Why do empty signifiers matter to politics? In: Laclau, E. Emancipation(s) (pp. 36-46). London: Verso.Laclau, e. and c. mouffe (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radial democratic politics. London: Verso.Larson, m. s. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. London: Travistock.Lasswell, h. d. (1951b). The policy orientation. In: Lerner, L.D. and H.D. Lasswell (eds.), The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method (pp.3-15). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Lave, j. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, University of Cambridge Press.Lave, j. and e. wenger (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Laws, d. (1998). Entrepreneural Networks. Cambridge: MIT.Laws, d., L. susskind, j. abrams (2001). Public entrepreneurship networks. Cambridge, US: Department of Urban Studies and Planning. Lei (Landbouw economisch instituut): jahae, j. B. en k. zimmerman (1999). Mainports en agrologistiek. Den Haag: LEI.Lemstra, w. (1997). Publiek private samenwerking onontbeerlijk. Groningen: oratie.Lijphart, a. (1968) [1988]. Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek. Haarlem: H.J.W. Becht.Lijphart, a. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Lincoln, y. s. and e. g. guba (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In: Denzin, N.K. and Y. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191-216), 2nd. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Linthout, m. (1999-2001). Aantekeningen Linthout, project creatieve concurrentie Bijlmerpark, Amsterdam.Lnrp (2004a). Community Agriculture Project: minutes of first meeting: Dairy dreams, Kewaunee. Town of Lincoln.Lnrp (2004b). Community Agriculture Project: minutes of meeting 3: Fenendael farm. Town of Lincoln.Lnrp (2004c). FNM Report, part of DG report. Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin.

References

224

References

225

Provincie Overijssel, Platform Agrologistiek, Innovatienetwerk.oost nv: van de Bunt, r. (2005). Make it happen: Naar een nieuwe toekomst voor de A1 Eitwitcorridor. Deventer.ozawa, c. and L.e. susskind (1985). Mediating science intensive disputes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5 (1): pp. 23-39.parkinson, j. (2003). Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51 (1): pp. 180- 196.patton, m. q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newburry Park: Sage Publications.paul, k. (2008). Food safety: A matter of taste?: Food safety policy discourse in England, Germany, The Netherlands and at the level op the European Union. Amsterdam: PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Department of Political Science, Amsterdam School of Social Science Research.petersen, j. c. (1984). Citizens participation in science policy. In: Petersen, J. C. (ed.), Citizens participation in science policy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.pierre, j. and g. B. peters (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Basingstoke: MacMillan.pishchikova, k. (2006). Lost in translation: USAID assistance to democracy building in post-communist Ukraine. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.platform agrologistiek, (2007). Intelligente oplossingen voor vervoersproblematiek. LNV Directie: Industrie en Handel. pleijte, m. (2006). Grenzen aan ontwikkelingsplanologie: een nieuwe aanpak problemen en oplossingen. TOPOS, 16: pp. 18-21.podziba, s.L. (1999). The Chelsea Charter consensus process: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. In: Susskind, L., S. McKearnan and J. Thomas-Larmer (eds.), Consensus building handbook (pp. 743- 772).Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.polyani, m. (1951). The logic of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.policy statement dnr george meyer (1999). A Green Tier for greater environmental protection. Madison: DNR.porter, m. e. (2000a). Location, clusters and company strategy. In: Clark. G. M.G. and Feldman, M. (eds.), Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 253-275).Oxford: Oxford University Press.porter, m. e. (2000b). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, pp. 15-34.pröpper, i. a. a. m. en d. a. steenbeek (1998). Interactieve beleidsvoering: Typering, ervaringen en dilemma’s. Bestuurskunde, 7: pp. 292-301.provincie gelderland (2003). Verslag plenair overleg A1 Eiwitcorridor 16 december 2003. Deventer: Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij Oost NV Deventer. provincie gelderland (2003b). Notitie A1 Eiwitcorridor aan MT Economische Zaken. Dirk de Jager (ed.). Arnhem: Provincie Gelderland.provincie gelderland (2004a). Transcript plenair overleg 24 augustus 2004. Deventer.provincie gelderland (2004b). Verslag plenair overleg A1 Eiwitcorridor 25 mei 2004. Arnhem: Oost NV.provincie gelderland (2005a). Dynamiek en vernieuwing op de Veluwe: reconstructieplan Veluwe. Arnhem.provincie gelderland (2005b). Reconstructieplan Gelderse Vallei/ Utrecht Oost: Van wet naar werkelijkheid, reconstructieplan Gelderland. Arnhem.

Anthropology, 16 (2): pp. 165-182.metze, m. (1995). De stranding. Nijmegen: SUN.metze, t. (2005a). Grenzen aan vernieuwing in het Bijlmerpark. Agora, 21 (5): pp. 24-27.metze, t. (2005b). Vermorzelde plannen: Democratische creativiteit in het Bijlmerpark. Tijdschrift voor de sociale sector, 59 (12): pp. 30-33.metze, t. (2006). Verboden toegang in het Bijlmerpark. In: Grin, J., M. Hajer en W. Versteeg (eds.), Meervoudige democratie: Ervaringen met vernieuwend bestuur. Amsterdam: Aksant.metze, t. (2009). Discursive power in deliberations on the creative economy in the Netherlands. Policy and Society, 28 (3): pp. 241-251.metze, t. (2010, forthcoming). New life for old buildings: Mediating between different meanings. In Colebatch, H.K., Hoppe, R. & Noordegraaf, M. (eds.), Working for policy (chapter 4). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.michelson, e. (1996). Usual suspects: Experience, reflection and the (en)gendering of knowledge. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 15 (6), pp: 438-454ministerie van Buitenlandse zaken (2001). Brief over steunmaatrregel van de staat, N652/2001- Nederland KLICT aan EU. Den Haag.mol. a. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.mommsen, w. j. (1992). The political and social theory of Max Weber: Collected essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.montfort, c. van (2008). Besturen van het onbekende: goed bestuur bij publiek- private arrangementen. Den Haag: Lemma.monpetit, e. (2003). Misplaced distrust: Policy networks and the environment in France, the United States and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press Canada.n1 6 (1999). Notitie Hans Hofstede. Amsterdam: stadsdeel Zuidoost.nesbit, r. c. (1973) [1989]. Wisconsin, a history. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.nowotny, h. (2003). Democratizing expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30 (3): pp. 151-156.o 1 (1998). Offerte creatieve concurrentie in het Bijlmerpark. Amsterdam: de Stad bv.o 1B (1998). Aangepaste offerte na commentaar van ambtenaren. Amsterdam: de Stad bv.o2 2 (2000). Offerte DRO voor ontwerp Nota van UIthangspunten. Amsterdam: Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening. o2 (1999). Offerte voor tweede ronde van Creatieve Concurrentie. Amsterdam: de Stad bv. oecd (organisation for economic cooperation and development) (2003). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: Effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes. Paris: OECD.oost nv (2003). 4 November 2003 Verslag ondernemersoverleg agrofoodindustrie. Hotel Holten.oost nv (2003). Eerste fase eiwitcorridor afgerond.Retrieved from:www.atoapps.nl/.../Eerste%20fase%20A1%20Eiwitcorridor%20afgerond%20%20Ambitieus%20project%20krijgt%20meer%20vaart.docoost nv (2004). Oost Nederland zet in op Vitale veehouderij ketens: A1 eiwitcorridor brengt nieuw elan in de productiekolom. Deventer: Oost NV, Provincie Gelderland,

References

226

References

227

rosenbaum, w. a. (2005). Environmental Politics and Policy. Washington: CQ Press.rosenberg, s. w. (2007a). Discourse types and democracy of deliberation. In Rosenberg, S.W. (ed.), Can the people govern?: Deliberation, participation and democracy (pp. 130- 158). NewYork: Palgrave MacMillan. rosenberg, s. w. (2007b). Introduction. In: Rosenberg, S.W. (ed.), Can the people govern?: Deliberation, participation and democracy (pp. 1-25). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. rpB (2005). Het gedeelde landschap. Den Haag: NAI uitgevers.rubenstein, e. c. (2004). Casting environmental governance: The evolution of regulatory relationships in the Wisonsin foundry industry. Cambridge: MIT.sabel, c., a. fung and B. karkkainen (1999). Beyond backyard environmentalism: How communities are quietly refashioning environmental regulation. The Boston Review, 24: pp. 4-23.sacks, h. and e. a. schegloff (1988). Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order goffman and the analysis of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.scharpf, f.w. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.schattschneider, e. e. (1960). The semi- sovereign people. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Wilson.schatzki, t. r., k. knorr- cetina and e. von savigny (ed.) (2001). The practice return in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge.schmidt, t. j.w. (1994). Foucault’s enlightenment. In: Kelly, M(ed.), Critique and power: Recasting the Foucault/ Habermas debate (pp. 283-314). Cambridge: MIT Pressschön, d. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.schwartz- shea, p. (2006). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In: Yanow, D. and Schwartz- Shea, P. (ed.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretative turn (pp. 89-113). New York: M.E. Scharpe.schwartz, p. (1996). The art of the long view: Planning for the future is an uncertain world. New York: Doubleday.scott, j.c. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.stadsdeel zuidoost (25 april 2007). Definitief ontwerp Bijlmerpark goedgekeurd: De weg is vrij voor de ontwikkeling van het nieuwe Bijlmerpark. Available: http://www.zuidoost.amsterdam.nl/actualiteiten_uit/persberichten/artikelen/2007_6_5_en_4/definitief_ontwerpshackley, s. and B. wynne (1995). Global climate change: The mutual construction of an emergent science-policy domain. Science and Public Policy, 22 (4): pp. 218-230.shackley, s. and B. wynne (1996). Representing uncertainty in global climate change science policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, technology and Human Values, 21 (3): pp. 275-302.shortle, j. s. and d. g. abler (2001). Environmental policies for agricultural pollution control. Glasgow: CABI publishing.smithers, j. and m. furman (2003). Environmental farm planning in Ontario: Exploring participation and the endurance of change. Land Use Policy, 20 (4): pp. 343-356.snow, d. a. and r. d. Benford (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In:

provincie overijssel (2005). Reconstructieplan Salland- Twente. Zwolle.putnam, h. (1981). Fact and value. In Putnam, H. (ed.), Reason, truth and history (pp. 127-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.putnam, h. (1995). Words and life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.raadsvoordracht zuidoost (1997). Raadsvoordracht voor structuurvisie van Bahlotra. Amsterdam: District government Zuidoost. reich, r. B. (1991). The work of nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.reijndorp, a. (1997). Between city and state: Social renewal in the Bijlmermeer, Archis, 3: pp. 56-63.rein, m. and d. schön (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In: Fischer, F. and J. Forester (eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke.renn, o. (1995). Styles of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22 (3): pp. 147-156.rhodes, r. a. w. (1990). Policy networks: a British perspective. Journal of theoretical politics, 2(2): pp. 293-317.rhodes, r. a. w. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. Political Quarterly, 65 (2): pp. 138-151.rhodes, r. a. w. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4): pp. 652-667.rhodes, r. a. w. (2000). Governance and Public Administration. In Pierre, J. (ed.), Debating governance (pp. 54-90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.rhodes, r. a. w. (2003a). Putting people back in networks. Australian Journal of Political Science, 37 (3): pp. 399-416.rhodes, r. a. w. (ed.) (2003b). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Philadelphia: Open University Pressrhodes, r. a. w. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28 (8): pp. 1243-1264.ribaudo, m. (2001). Non–point source pollution control policy in the US. In Shortle, J.S. and D.G. Abler (eds.), Environmental policies for agricultural pollution control (pp. 123-149).Glasgow: CABI Publishing, University of Glasgow.rickenbach, m. g. and a.s . reed (2002). Cross- boundary cooperation in a watershed context: The sentiments of private forest landowners. Environmental Management, 30 (4): pp. 584-594.rijnconsult (2004a). Verslag derde vergadering stuurgroep A1 Eiwitcorridor ‘Make it happen’. Utrecht: Rabobank Nederland.rijnconsult (2004b). Verslag eerste stuurgroepvergadering A1 Eiwitcorridor ‘Make it happen’. Deventer.rijnconsult (2004c). Verslag vierder vergadering Stuurgroep A1 Eiwitcorridor ‘Make it happen’. Utrecht: Raboabank Nederland.rip, a, t. j. misa and j. schot, j. (eds.) (1995). Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter.rivm (2007). Nationaal Kompas Gezondheid maart 2007. Wageningen: RIVM.rondinellia, d. and g. vastagb(2000). Panacea, common sense or just a label?: The value ofISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal, 18, 499-510.roots, c. (1999). Environmental movements: Local, national and global. London & Portland: OR, Frank Cass.

References

228

References

229

& networks: The coordination of social life. Thousand Oaks: Sage.torgerson, d. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19 (1): pp. 33-53. torgerson, d. (2003). Democracy through policy discourse. In: Hajer, M. and H. Wagenaar (eds.), Deliberative policy analysis (pp. 113-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.transcript swpa1 (2004). Transcript scenarioworkshop scenarioschaalvergroting, Zwolle.transcript swpa2 (2004). Transcript scenarioworkshop financiële hoe en wat middagsessie, Zwolle.transcript swpL1 (2004). Transcript scenarioworkshop plenaire introductie 1a en 1b., Zwolle.transcript swpL3 (2004). Transcript scenarioworkshop plenaire start middag, Zwolle.transcript swpL4 (2004). Transcript scenarioworkshop plenaire afsluiting middag, Zwolle.triou, m. (2007). Alle begin is moeilijk: Over de initiatieffase van een complex ruimtelijk vraagstuk: Programma A1 zone. Rotterdam en Wageningen: Erasmus Universiteit en Wageningen Universiteit.tuinstra, w. (2006). Reducing air pollution in Europe: A study of boundaries between science and policy.Wageningen: Universiteit van Wageningen, SENSE.turner, v. (1974). Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press.turnhout, e., m. hisschemöller and h. eijsackers (2006). Ecologischekwaliteitsdoelstellingen in het Nederlandse natuurbeleid. Beleidswetenschap, 20(3): pp. 15-32.turnhout, e., m. hisschemöller, and h. eijsackers (2007). Ecological indicators: Between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7(2): pp. 215-228.uit 1 1 (1999). Uitkomsten speciale commissievergaderingen Bijlmerpark,de Stad bv iov Stadsdeel Zuid Oost, Amsterdam).universiteit twente, radbout universiteit nijmegen, wageningen university research (jaartal onbekend). Kansen voor Agrologistieke concepten in de A1 Eiwitcorridor, i.o.v. Oost NV, Deventer.us census Bureau (2002). Census of population and housing. Summary population and housing characteristics. PHC 1 1 United States, Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration. v1 1 verslag 3e bijeenkomst cci (1998). Verslag derde openbare bijeenkomst Creatieve Concurrentie. Amsterdam.v1 2 verslag 2e bijeenkomst cci (1998). Verslag tweede openbare bijeenkomst Creatieve Concurrentie. Amsterdam.v1 3 startbijeenkomst cci (1998). Verslag startbijeenkomst Creatieve Concurrentie. Amsterdam.v1 4 (1999). Verslag eerste extra commissie RO vergadering stadsdeel Zuidoost Amsterdam.v1 5 (1999). Verslag tweede extra commissie vergadering RO stadsdeel Zuidoost Amsterdam.v1 18/19 (1998). Overleg over offerte: Creatieve Concurrentie proces voor Bijlmerpark. Amsterdam.v1 20 (1998). Verslag openbaar slotdebat over Creatieve Concurrentie in het

Morris, A.D. and C. McClurg-Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 135-155). New Haven: Yale Universitysørenson, e. and j. torfing (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Houndmills: Palgrave.sölvell, Ö, g. Lindqvist and c. ketels (2003). Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm.stad bv, de (1998). Offerte, fax en verslagen van de openbare bijeenkomsten Creatieve Concurrentie in het Bijlmerpark. Amsterdam.stad bv, de (2000). Video Bijlmerpark, Amsterdam.stake, r.e. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In: Denzin, N.K. and Y. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-456), 2nd. Thousand Oaks: Sage.star, s. L. and j. r. griesemer (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19 (3): pp. 387-420.state of wisconsin (2004). Act 276 (Green tier law)/ Assembly Bill 421 (vetoed)/ Senate Bill 61 2003. Madison.stern, r. and green, j. (2005). Boundary workers and the management of frustration: A case study of the healthy city partnerships. Health Promotion International, 20, 269-276stone, d. a. (2002). The policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.storey, a. (2000). The World Bank, neo- liberalism and power: Discourse analysis and implications for campaigners. Development in Practice, 10 (3&4): pp. 361-370.strauss, a. L. (1993). Continual Permutations of Action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.susskind, L. and j. cruikshank (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public. New York: Basic Books.susskind, L. and p. field (1996). Dealing with an angry public: the mutual gains approach. New York: The Free Press.susskind, L., s. mckearnan and j. thomas-Larmer (eds.) (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thoasand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. t1 1 teisman, g. (1998). Toelichting G. Teisman en J. Saris voor raadsleden in commissie RO/ CSV. Amsterdam.tanesescu, i. (2006). Competitiveness and environmental policy: A failed marriage? Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2 (1): pp. 92-104.tatenhove, j. van, and p. Leroy (1995). Beleidsnetwerken: een kritische analyse. Beleidswetenschap, 9(2): pp. 128-145. tatenhove, j. p. m van, and p. Leroy (2003). Environment and participation in a context of political modernization. Environmental Values, 12 (2003): pp. 155-174.taylor, c. (1984). Foucault on freedom and truth. Political Theory, 12, 152-183.teisman, g. r. (1997). Sturen via Creatieve Concurrentie: Een innovatief- planologisch perspectief of ruimtelijke investeringsprojecten. Nijmegen: Inaugurele rede KUN.teisman, g. r. (2000). Ervaring met besluitvorming over de herinrichting van het Bijlmerpark in het stadsdeel Stadsdeel Zuidoost. Rotterdam: EURteisman, g. r. (2005). Publiek management op de grens van chaos en orde: Over leiding geven en organiseren in complexiteit. Den Haag: Academic Servicethompson, g., j. frances, r. Levacic and j. mitchell (1991). Market, hierarchies

References

230

References

231

and Public Policy, 28 (6): pp. 413-421.webne- Behrman, h. (2004). Green Tier stakeholder (dairy Ag) convening process design. Draft 10/15/2004. Madison.webne- Behrman, h. (2005b). Notes from Green Tier Dairy Ag implementation team. Madison.webne- Behrman, h. (2005a). Green Tier in agriculture. Vision: Madison, WEIwei- imes, j. (2004). Scope of work: Dairy Gateway September 152004 Report. Madison: WEI.weiss, c. h. and m. j. Bucuvales (1980). Truth tests and utility tests: Decision- makers frames of reference for social science research. American Sociological Review, 45 (April): pp. 302-313.wetherell, m. (2001). Debates in discourse research. In: Wetherell, M., S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds.), Discourse theory and practice (pp.380-399). Thousand Oaks: Sage.wildalvsky, a. (1979). The art and craft of policy analysis. London: MacMillan.wilson, s. and c. kitzinger (eds.) (1995). Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.wilson, g.k. (2002). Importing cooperation. In: Proceedings of Convention of the Midwest political science association. Chicago, Illinois.wisconsin act 235 (2003). Wisconsin act 235. Madison, Wisconsin..woodhouse, e. j. and d. a. nieuwsma (2001). Democratic expertise: Integrating knowledge, power and participation. In Hisschemöller, M., R. Hoppe, W.N. Dunn and J.R. Ravetz (eds.), Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis (pp. 73-96). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.woolgar, s. (ed.) (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.wrr (1998). Ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek. Den Haag: WRR.wunderlich, g. (2004). Evolution of the stewardship idea in American country life. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17 (1): pp. 77-93.wur (wageningen university research) (2003). Zoeken naar het ei van Columbus: Een raamplan voor agrologistieke innovayie in de A1 Eiwitcorridor (eindverslag KLICT A1). Wageningen: WUR-LEI, Alterra, A&F, UT.wur, Buck consultants, and rijnconsult (2003). Eindverslag KLICT: A1 Eiwitcorridor. In opdracht van Oost NV, Deventer.yanow, d. (2003). Constructing ‘ race’ and ‘ethnicity’ in America: Category making in public policy and administrayion. New York: Armonk.zerbe, m. j. (2007). Composition and rhetoric of science: Engaging the dominant discourse. Southern Illinois University.zijde, j. van de (1998). Over het managen van complexe projecten in politieke context. Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon.zuidoost, stadsdeel (1996). Plan en besluitvormingsproces ruimtelijke maatregelen. Amsterdam: Gemeente Amsterdam.

Bijlmerpark op de grote Kwakoeweide. Amsterdam: Zuidoost.v1 21 (1998). Verslag van extra openbare bijeenkomst ter bespreking van catalogus/ werkboek Bijlmerpark. Amsterdam: De Stad bv ism DRO en Stadsdeel Zuidoost.v1 22 (1999). Verslag van de eerste inspraakbijeenkomst met betrekking tot de voordracht planontwikkeling BP. Amsterdam: Stadsdeel Zuidoost.v1 23 (1999). Verslag van de tweede inspraakbijeenkomst over de raadsvoordracht. In Stadsdeel Zuidoost, H.Hofstede. Amsterdam.v2 0 (2000). Verslag eerste openbare bijeenkomst van de tweede ronde van Creatieve Concurrentie. Amsterdam: de Stad bv.v2 1 (2000). Verslag eerste werkconferentie Creatieve Concurrentie ronde 2. Amsterdam: de Stad bv.v2 22 (2000). Verslag werkatelier Sport. Amsterdam: DRO.v2 23 (2000). Verslag 2e werkconferentie Creatieve Concurrentie II. Amsterdam: de Stad bv.v2 24 (2000). Verslag 3e werkconferentie tweede ronde Creatieve Concurrentie. Amsterdam: De Stad bv.v2 26 (2000a). Verslag themagroep lifeline bij eerste werkconferentie, de Stad bv. Amsterdam.v2 26 (2000b). Verslag van vergadering van de Stuurgroep Bijlmerpark d.d. 13 april 2000. In stadsdeel Zuidoost. Amsterdam.v2 s4 (2000). Verslag vierde stuurgroep vergadering Bijlmerpark. Amsterdam.v3 2 (2001). Verslag werkoverleg Bijlmerpark 9 januari 2001. Amsterdam: Stadsdeel Zuidoost.veghel, m. van and f. wassenberg (2001). Ruimte rondom hoogbouw. Rooilijn, 8: pp. 372-377.vereijken, p. h. and h. j. agricola (2004). Transitie naar niet agrarisch gebruik van het buitengebied: Hoe kunnen gemeenten en provincies er op inspelen? Wageningen: Alterra.verheijden, j. h. r. (1997). Notitie over planvorming Bijlmerpark. Amsterdam: REO, Stadsdeel Zuidoost.vo2 1 (2000). Procesontwerp Bijlmerpark- een voorstel no2., de Stad bv, Amsterdam. vogel, d. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press.vpro (1998). Re-topia: Bijlmer (documentaire). In: VPRO laat, Hilversum.waarden, f. van (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21 (1-2): pp. 29-52.wagenaar, h. and n. s. d. cook (2003). Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In Hajer, M. and H. Wagenaar (eds.), Deliberative policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.wagenberg, c. p. a. van (2003). Werkplan multi-clientproject Eiwitcorridor A1 (KLICT project HR 186). Wageningen: WUR interne notitie.warren, m. (1992). Democratic theory and self- transformation. American Political Science Review, 86 (1): pp. 8-23.warren m. (1996). Deliberative democracy and authority. American Political Science Review, 90 (1): pp. 46-60.wassenberg, f. (2002). De openbare Bijlmer. Rooilijn, 6, 267-272.wdnr (2009). Green Tier biennial progress report 2009. Wisconsin.weale, a. (2001). Science advice, democratic responsiveness and public policy. Science