Report to the BoardDate May 2014

Ware Elementary

SITE COUNCIL MEMBERS

• Alicia Scofield , Jared Larson- Co-Chairs

• Michaela Larson, Deb Gustafson, Dana Williamson, Nancy Norris, Kathy Sheffield, Melanie Gray, Tiffany Kelsay, Lynn Kruse, Erica Flenoury, Tonia Horton, Veronica Wait, Lindsay Lokodi, Erin Taylor, Jamie Deville, Sharon Harrison, Jennifer Black,  Amy Madetzke,  Jenny Harper, Melanie Gray, Kathy Sheffield

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT MEMBERS

• All Certified Staff Members

SIP and Site Council meet monthly for regular meetings.

MTSS is part of the SIP process.

School Improvement Process

School Demographics

Free &Reduced 75%

ESS 10%

African American 13%

Hispanic 19%

White 52%

API increase by 5 points to 677

– State assessment data

– Formative assessment data – SRI

Reduce Non Proficient by .48

– State assessment data

– Formative assessment data-SRI

Reading Goals

Kindercorner strategies– Learning Labs to increase vocabulary development

– Placement of students in Roots if achieving passing ROOTS assessment.

Roots strategies

– Aggressive placement of students

– Reading Counts assessment

– SRI assessments once passed story 48.

– Cooperative Learning

Wings strategies

– Aggressive placement of students

– Reading Counts assessment

– Cooperative Learning

– Posting objectives and goals

Strategies for Supporting Goals

2013 Reading Achievement by

Performance Groups

All Free & Reduced Disabilities Hispanic0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Academic Warning (%) Approaches Standard (%) Meets Standard (%) Exceeds Standard (%) Exemplary (%)

2012 Reading Achievement by

Performance Groups

All Free & Reduced Disabilities African American Hispanic0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Academic Warning (%) Approaches Standard (%) Meets Standard (%) Exceeds Standard (%) Exemplary (%)

READING AMO Progress CategoriesOne area must be achieved for accreditation.

Achievement GapReading   Reading  

NO NO

Growth ProficiencyReading   Reading  

YES NO

2013 Reading API Comparison

Kansas USD 475 Ware620

630

640

650

660

670

680

APIReading  

NO

GAP ReductionReading  

NO

Reduction of Non-ProficientReading  

NO

Elementary Annual Measureable Objective

 2012 % Below

Proficient2013 % Below Proficient Goal

2013 % Below Proficient

Actual ChangeReach AMO

Goal?

Reading 5.8 5.32 10.98 +5.18 NO

Growth (Individual)Reading  

YESBuilding’s Median Student Growth Percentile:Reading: 53

API increase by 5 points to 729

– State assessment data

– Formative assessment data – Unit assessments

– SMI for lowest 20%

Reduce Non Proficient by .18

– State assessment data

– Formative assessment data – Unit assessments

– SMI for lowest 20%

Math Goals

• Implementation of district common core strategies as outlined by the grade level task force.

• Depth of knowledge questions.

• Increase student explanation of math answers.

• Multi-step math problems.

Share your strategies for supporting your goals

2013 Math Achievement by Performance Groups

All Free & Reduced Disabilities Hispanic0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Academic Warning (%) Approaches Standard (%) Meets Standard (%) Exceeds Standard (%) Exemplary (%)

2012 Math Achievement by Performance Groups

All Free & Reduced Disabilities African American Hispanic0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Academic Warning (%) Approaches Standard (%) Meets Standard (%) Exceeds Standard (%) Exemplary (%)

MATH AMO Progress CategoriesOne area must be achieved for accreditation.

Achievement GapReading   Reading  

NO NO

Growth ProficiencyReading   Reading  

YES NO

Kansas USD 475 Ware0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2013 Math API Comparison

AchievementMath  

NO Elementary Annual Measureable Objective

  2012 API2013

Goal API2013

Actual API 2013 CategoryReach AMO

Goal?

Math 755 757 724 Transitioning NO

GapMath  

NO

Reduction of Non- ProficientMath  

NO Elementary Annual Measureable Objective

 2012 % Below

Proficient2013 % Below Proficient Goal

2013 % Below Proficient

Actual ChangeReach AMO

Goal?

Math 2.17 1.69 5.45 +3.76 NO

Growth (Individual)Math  

YES

Building’s Median Student Growth Percentile:Math: 53%

• Ware Elementary met their AMO in the area of growth in reading and math.

• Hispanic students met AMO in RNP.

Met/Not Met Summary