DRAFT REPORT E-329VOL. 5

METAP/EIB/WORLD BANK

Waste Management ServiceImprovement Project for the JeninGovernorate:Environmental AssessmentAnnexes

May 2000

Environmental Resources Management8 Cavendish Square, London WlM OER

Telephone 0171 465 7200Facsimile 0171 465 7272Email post@ermuk.comhttp://www.ermuk.com

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

I S k

METAP/EIB/WORLD BANK

Waste Management ServiceImprovement Project for the JeninGovernorate:Environmental AssessmentAnnexes

Reference 6548May 2000

For and on behalf ofEnvirolunental Resources Managenment

Approved by: ,jrvC a Ca AaLHXJ

Sign,led: 16e&q4Position: a vgx/Cg

Date: /22 2iT

Approved by: -. T .

Signed: \7Qc S& S- -

Position: \q twz mu; e

Date: _\ t ) O

This report has been prepared by Environmental ResourcesManagement the trading name of Environmental ResourcesManagement Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligencewithin the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating ourGeneral Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account ofthe resources devoted to it by agreement with the client.

We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect ofany matters outside the scope of the above.

This report is confidential to the client and we accept noresponsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom thisreport, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies onthe report at their own risk.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANNEXES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annex 1.1 World Bank Operational Policy (OP) 4.01

Annex 1.2 EA Scope

Annex 1.3 EA Preparers and Contributors

Annex 2.1 Article 12 - OSLO 11 Interim Agreement

Annex 3.1 Leachate Analysis Results

Annex 3.2 Detailed Collection and Transfer Design

Annex 3.3 Site Management of Zaharat Finjan Sanitary Landfill

Annex 4.1 Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP)

Annex 4.2 Public Consultation Questioning Guide Level 1

Annex 4.3 Public Consultation Questioning Guide Level 2

Annex 4.4 Participants in the ZF Site Visit 3 December 1998

Annex 4.5 Participants in NGO Workshop in Jenin 23 April 2000

Annex 4.6 Interviews with Waste Pickers at the Present Jenin Dump Site, April2000

Annex 4.7 Sumrnmary of Public Consultation Findings

Annex 5.1 Geological Borehole Log

Annex 5.2 Groundwater Abstractions

Annex 5.3 Major Flora and Fauna of the West Bank

Annex 5.4 Interviewed People - Cultural and Religious Heritage Assessment

Annex 8.1 Environmental Management Plan for the Waste Disposal Component

of Project Proposals

Annex 1.1

World Bank Operational Policy(OP) 4.01

OP 4.01January 1999

|These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff and are not necessarily alcomplete treatment of the subject.

Environmental Assessment

Note: OP, BP, and GP 4.01 together replace OMS 2.36, Environmental Aspects ofBank Work; OD 4.00, Annex A, Environmental Assessment; OD 4.00, Annex B,Environmental Policy for Dam and Reservoir Projects; OD 4.01, EnvironmentalAssessment; and the following Operational Memoranda: Environmental

ssessments: Instructions to Staff on the Handling of the Borrower's Consultationswith Affected Groups and Relevant Local NGOs, 4110190; EnvironmentalAssessments: Instructions to Staff on the Release of Environmental Assessments toExecutive Directors, 11121190; and Release of Environmental Assessments toExecutive Directors, 2120191. Additional information related to these statements isprovided in the Environmental Assessment Sourcebook (Washington, D.C.: WorldBank, 1991) and subsequent updates available from the Environment Sector Board,and in the Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook. Other Bank statementsthat relate to the environment include OP/BPIGP 4.02, Environmental Action Plans;GP 4.03, Agricultural Pest Management; OPIBPIGP 4.04, Natural Habitats; OP 4.07,Water Resources Management; OP 4.09, Pest Management; OP 4.11, SafeguardingCultural Property in Bank-Financed Projects (forthcoming); OPIBP 4.12, InvoluntaryResettlement (forthcoming); OPIGP 4.36, Forestry; OP/BP 10.04, EconomicEvaluation of Investment Operations; and OD 4.20, Indigenous Peoples. This OPand BP apply to all projects for which a PID is first issued after March 1, 1999.Questions may be addressed to the Chair, Environment Sector Board.

1. The Bankl requires environmental assessment (EA) of projects proposed for Bankfinancing to help ensure that they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus toimprove decision making.

2. EA is a process whose breadth, depth, and type of analysis depend on the nature, scale,and potential environmental impact of the proposed project. EA evaluates a project'spotential environmental risks and impacts in its area of influence;2 examines projectalternatives; identifies ways of improving project selection, siting, planning, design, andimplementation by preventing, minimizing, mitigating, or compensating for adverseenvironmental impacts and enhancing positive impacts; and includes the process ofmitigating and managing adverse environmental impacts throughout project implementation.The Bank favors preventive measures over mitigatory or compensatory measures, wheneverfeasible.

3. EA takes into account the natural environment (air, water, and land); human health andsafety; social aspects (involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples, and cultural property);3

and transboundary and global environmental aspects.4 EA considers natural and socialaspects in an integrated way. It also takes into account the variations in project and countryconditions; the findings of country environmental studies; national environmental actionplans; the country's overall policy framework, national legislation, and institutionalcapabilities related to the environment and social aspects; and obligations of the country,pertaining to project activities, under relevant international environmental treaties andagreements. The Bank does not finance project activities that would contravene suchcountry obligations, as identified during the EA. EA is initiated as early as possible in projectprocessing and is integrated closely with the economic, financial, institutional, social, andtechnical analyses of a proposed project.

4. The borrower is responsible for carrying out the EA. For Category A projects,5 the

borrower retains independent EA experts not affiliated with the project to carry out the EA.6For Category A projects that are highly risky or contentious or that involve serious andmultidimensional environmental concerns, the borrower should normally also engage anadvisory panel of independent, internationally recognized environmental specialists toadvise on all aspects of the project relevant to the EA.7 The role of the advisory panel

depends on the degree to which project preparation has progressed, and on the extent andquality of any EA work completed, at the time the Bank begins to consider the project.

5. The Bank advises the borrower on the Bank's EA requirements. The Bank reviews thefindings and recommendations of the EA to determine whether they provide an adequatebasis for processing the project for Bank financing. When the borrower has completed orpartially completed EA work prior to the Bank's involvement in a project, the Bank reviewsthe EA to ensure its consistency with this policy. The Bank may, if appropriate, requireadditional EA work, including public consultation and disclosure.

6. The Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook describes pollution prevention and

abatement measures and emission levels that are normally acceptable to the Bank.However, taking into account borrower country legislation and local conditions, the EA mayrecommend alternative emission levels and approaches to pollution prevention andabatement for the project. The EA report must provide full and detailed justification for thelevels and approaches chosen for the particular project or site.

EA Instruments

7. Depending on the project, a range of instruments can be used to satisfy the Bank's EArequirement: environmental impact assessment (EIA), regional or sectoral EA,environmental audit, hazard or risk assessment, and environmental management plan(EMP).8 EA applies one or more of these instruments, or elements of them, as appropriate.When the project is likely to have sectoral or regional impacts, sectoral or regional EA isrequired.9

Environmental Screening

8. The Bank undertakes environmental screening of each proposed project to determine theappropriate extent and type of EA. The Bank classifies the proposed project into one of four

categories, depending on the type, location, sensitivity, and scale of the project and thenature and magnitude of its potential environmental impacts.

(a) Category A: A proposed project is classified as Category A if it is likely to havesignificant adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive,10 diverse, orunprecedented. These impacts may affect an area broader than the sites or facilitiessubject to physical works. EA for a Category A project examines the project's potentialnegative and positive environmental impacts, compares them with those of feasiblealternatives (including the "without project" situation), and recommends any measuresneeded to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts andimprove environmental performance. For a Category A project, the borrower isresponsible for preparing a report, normally an EIA (or a suitably comprehensiveregional or sectoral EA) that includes, as necessary, elements of the other instrumentsreferred to in para. 7.

(b) Category B: A proposed project is classified as Category B if its potential adverseenvironmental impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas-including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural habitats-are less adversethan those of Category A projects. These impacts are site-specific; few if any of themare irreversible; and in most cases mitigatory measures can be designed more readilythan for Category A projects. The scope of EA for a Category B project may vary fromproject to project, but it is narrower than that of Category A EA. Like Category A EA, itexamines the project's potential negative and positive environmental impacts andrecommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate foradverse impacts and improve environmental performance. The findings and results ofCategory B EA are described in the project documentation (Project AppraisalDocument and Project Information Document).11

(c) Category C: A proposed project is classified as Category C if it is likely to have minimalor no adverse environmental impacts.

Beyond screening, no further EA action is required for a Category C project.

(d) Category FR: A proposed project is classified as Category Fl if it involves investment ofBank funds through a financial intermediary, in subprojects that may result in adverseenvironmental impacts.

EA for Special Project Types

Sector Investment Lending

9. For sector investment loans (SILs),12 during the preparation of each proposedsubproject, the project coordinating entity or implementing institution carries out appropriateEA according to country requirements and the requirements of this policy.13 The Bankappraises and, if necessary, includes in the SIL components to strengthen, the capabilitiesof the coordinating entity or the implementing institution to (a) screen subprojects, (b) obtainthe necessary expertise to carry out EA, (c) review all findings and results of EA forindividual subprojects, (d) ensure implementation of mitigation measures (including, whereapplicable, an EMP), and (e) monitor environmental conditions during projectimplementation.14 If the Bank is not satisfied that adequate capacity exists for carrying out

EA, all Category A subprojects and, as appropriate, Category B subprojects-including anyEA reports-are subject to prior review and approval by the Bank.

Sector Adjustment Lending

10. Sector adjustment loans (SECALs) are subject to the requirements of this policy. EA fora SECAL assesses the potential environmental impacts of planned policy, institutional, andregulatory actions under the loan.15

Financial Intermediary Lending

11. For a financial intermediary (Fl) operation, the Bank requires that each Fl screenproposed subprojects and ensure that subborrowers carry out appropriate EA for eachsubproject. Before approving a subproject, the Fl verifies (through its own staff, outsideexperts, or existing environmental institutions) that the subproject meets the environmentalrequirements of appropriate national and local authorities and is consistent with this OP andother applicable environmental policies of the Bank.16

12. In appraising a proposed Fl operation, the Bank reviews the adequacy of countryenvironmental requirements relevant to the project and the proposed EA arrangements forsubprojects, including the mechanisms and responsibilities for environmental screening andreview of EA results. When necessary, the Bank ensures that the project includescomponents to strengthen such EA arrangements. For Fl operations expected to haveCategory A subprojects, prior to the Bank's appraisal each identified participating Fl providesto the Bank a written assessment of the institutional mechanisms (including, as necessary,identification of measures to strengthen capacity) for its subproject EA work.17 If the Bankis not satisfied that adequate capacity exists for carrying out EA, all Category A subprojectsand, as appropriate, Category B subprojects-including EA reports-are subject to prior reviewand approval by the Bank.18

Emergency Recovery Projects

13. The policy set out in OP 4.01 normally applies to emergency recovery projectsprocessed under OP 8.50, Emergency Recovery Assistance. However, when compliancewith any requirement of this policy would prevent the effective and timely achievement of theobjectives of an emergency recovery project, the Bank may exempt the project from such arequirement. The justification for any such exemption is recorded in the loan documents. Inall cases, however, the Bank requires at a minimum that (a) the extent to which theemergency was precipitated or exacerbated by inappropriate environmental practices bedetermined as part of the preparation of such projects, and (b) any necessary correctivemeasures be built into either the emergency project or a future lending operation.

Institutional Capacity

14. When the borrower has inadequate legal or technical capacity to carry out key EA-related functions (such as review of EA, environmental monitoring, inspections, ormanagement of mitigatory measures) for a proposed project, the project includescomponents to strengthen that capacity.

Public Consultation

15. For all Category A and B projects proposed for IBRD or IDA financing, during the EAprocess, the borrower consults project-affected groups and local nongovernmentalorganizations (NGOs) about the project's environmental aspects and takes their views intoaccount.19 The borrower initiates such consultations as early as possible. For Category Aprojects, the borrower consults these groups at least twice: (a) shortly after environmentalscreening and before the terms of reference for the EA are finalized; and (b) once a draft EAreport is prepared. In addition, the borrower consults with such groups throughout projectimplementation as necessary to address EA-related issues that affect them.20

Disclosure

16. For meaningful consultations between the borrower and project-affected groups andlocal NGOs on all Category A and B projects proposed for IBRD or IDA financing, theborrower provides relevant material in a timely manner prior to consultation and in a formand language that are understandable and accessible to the groups being consulted.

17. For a Category A project, the borrower provides for the initial consultation a summary ofthe proposed project's objectives, description, and potential impacts; for consultation afterthe draft EA report is prepared, the borrower provides a summary of the EA's conclusions.In addition, for a Category A project, the borrower makes the draft EA report available at apublic place accessible to project-affected groups and local NGOs. For SILs and Floperations, the borrower/Fl ensures that EA reports for Category A subprojects are madeavailable in a public place accessible to affected groups and local NGOs.

18. Any separate Category B report for a project proposed for IDA financing is madeavailable to project-affected groups and local NGOs. Public availability in the borrowingcountry and official receipt by the Bank of Category A reports for projects proposed for IBRDor IDA financing, and of any Category B EA report for projects proposed for IDA funding, areprerequisites to Bank appraisal of these projects.

19. Once the borrower officially transmits the Category A EA report to the Bank, the Bankdistributes the summary (in English) to the executive directors (EDs) and makes the reportavailable through its InfoShop. Once the borrower officially transmits any separate CategoryB EA report to the Bank, the Bank makes it available through its InfoShop.21 If the borrowerobjects to the Bank's releasing an EA report through the World Bank InfoShop, Bank staff(a) do not continue processing an IDA project, or (b) for an IBRD project, submit the issue offurther processing to the EDs.

Implementation

20. During project implementation, the borrower reports on (a) compliance with measuresagreed with the Bank on the basis of the findings and results of the EA, includingimplementation of any EMP, as set out in the project documents; (b) the status of mitigatorymeasures; and (c) the findings of monitoring programs. The Bank bases supervision of theproject's environmental aspects on the findings and recommendations of the EA, includingmeasures set out in the legal agreements, any EMP, and other project documents.22

Notes:

1. "Bank" includes IDA; "EA" refers to the entire process set out in OP/BP 4.01; "loans" includescredits; "borrower" includes, for guarantee operations, a private or public project sponsor receivingfrom another financial institution a loan guaranteed by the Bank; and "project" covers all operationsfinanced by Bank loans or guarantees except structural adjustment loans (for which the environmentalprovisions are set out in OP/BP 8.60, Adjustment Lending, forthcoming) and debt and debt serviceoperations, and also includes projects under adaptable lending-adaptable program loans (APLs) andlearning and innovation loans (LILs)-and projects and components funded under the GlobalEnvironment Facility. The project is described in Schedule 2 to the Loan/Credit Agreement. Thispolicy applies to all components of the project, regardless of the source of financing.

2. For definitions, see Annex A. The area of influence for any project is determined with the advice ofenvironmental specialists and set out in the EA terms of reference.

3. See OP/BP/GP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement (forthcoming); OD 4.20, Indigenous Peoples; andOP 4.1 1, Safeguarding Cultural Property in Bank-Financed Projects (forthcoming).

4. Global environmental issues include climate change, ozone-depleting substances, pollution ofinternational waters, and adverse impacts on biodiversity.

5. For screening, see para. 8.

6. EA is closely integrated with the project's economic, financial, institutional, social, and technicalanalyses to ensure that (a) environmental considerations are given adequate weight in projectselection, siting, and design decisions; and (b) EA does not delay project processing. However, theborrower ensures that when individuals or entities are engaged to carry out EA activities, any conflictof interest is avoided. For example, when an independent EA is required, it is not carried out by theconsultants hired to prepare the engineering design.

7. The panel (which is different from the dam safety panel required under OP/ BP 4.37, Safety ofDams) advises the borrower specifically on the following aspects: (a) the terms of reference for theEA, (b) key issues and methods for preparing the EA, (c) recommendations and findings of the EA, (d)implementation of the EA's recommendations, and (e) development of environmental managementcapacity.

8. These terms are defined in Annex A. Annexes B and C discuss the content of EA reports andEMPs.

9. Guidance on the use of sectoral and regional EA is available in EA Sourcebook Updates 4 and 15.

10. A potential impact is considered "sensitive" if it may be irreversible (e.g., lead to loss of a majornatural habitat) or raise issues covered by OD 4.20, Indigenous Peoples; OP 4.04, Natural Habitats;OP 4.11, Safeguarding Cultural Property in Bank-Financed Projects (forthcoming); or OP 4.12,Involuntary Resettlement (forthcoming).11. When the screening process determines, or national legislation requires, that any of theenvironmental issues identified warrant special attention, the findings and results of Category B EAmay be set out in a separate report. Depending on the type of project and the nature and magnitudeof the impacts, this report may include, for example, a limited environmental impact assessment, anenvironmental mitigation or management plan, an environmental audit, or a hazard assessment. ForCategory B projects that are not in environmentally sensitive areas and that present well-defined andwell-understood issues of narrow scope, the Bank may accept alternative approaches for meeting EArequirements: for example, environmentally sound design criteria, siting criteria, or pollution standardsfor small-scale industrial plants or rural works; environmentally sound siting criteria, constructionstandards, or inspection procedures for housing projects; or environmentally sound operatingprocedures for road rehabilitation projects.

12. SILs normally involve the preparation and implementation of annual investment plans orsubprojects as time slice activities over the course of the project.

13. In addition, if there are sectorwide issues that cannot be addressed through individual subprojectEAs (and particularly if the SIL is likely to include Category A subprojects), the borrower may berequired to carry out sectoral EA before the Bank appraises the SIL.

14. Where, pursuant to regulatory requirements or contractual arrangements acceptable to the Bank,any of these review functions are carried out by an entity other than the coordinating entity orimplementing institution, the Bank appraises such alternative arrangements; however, theborrower/coordinating entity/implementing institution remains ultimately responsible for ensuring thatsubprojects meet Bank requirements.

15. Actions that would require such assessment include, for example, privatization of environmentallysensitive enterprises, changes in land tenure in areas with important natural habitats, and relativeprice shifts in commodities such as pesticides, timber, and petroleum.

16. The requirements for Fl operations are derived from the EA process and are consistent with theprovisions of para. 6 of this OP. The EA process takes into account the type of finance beingconsidered, the nature and scale of anticipated subprojects, and the environmental requirements ofthe jurisdiction in which subprojects will be located.

17. Any Fl included in the project after appraisal complies with the same requirement as a condition ofits participation.

18. The criteria for prior review of Category B subprojects, which are based on such factors as type orsize of the subproject and the EA capacity of the financial intermediary, are set out in the legalagreements for the project.

19. For the Bank's approach to NGOs, see GP 14.70, Involving Nongovemmental Organizations inBank-Supported Activities.

20. For projects with major social components, consultations are also required by other Bank policies-for example, OD 4.20, Indigenous Peoples, and OP/BP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement (forthcoming).

21. For a further discussion of the Bank's disclosure procedures, see The World Bank Policy onDisclosure of Information (March 1994) and BP 17.50, Disclosure of Operational Information. Specificrequirements for disclosure of resettlement plans and indigenous peoples development plans are setout in OP/BP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement (forthcoming), and OP/BP 4.10, forthcoming revision ofoD 4.20, Indigenous Peoples.

22. See OP/BP 13.05, Project Supervision, forthcoming.

OP 4.01 - Annex AJanuary 1999

These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff and are not necessarily a.cmplete treatment of the subject.

Definitions1. Environmental audit: An instrument to determine the nature and extent of allenvironmental areas of concern at an existing facility. The audit identifies and justifiesappropriate measures to mitigate the areas of concern, estimates the cost of the measures,and recommends a schedule for implementing them. For certain projects, the EA reportmay consist of an environmental audit alone; in other cases, the audit is part of the EAdocumentation.

2. Environmental impact assessment (EIA): An instrument to identify and assess thepotential environmental impacts of a proposed project, evaluate alternatives, and designappropriate mitigation, management, and monitoring measures. Projects and subprojectsneed EIA to address important issues not covered by any applicable regional or sectoral EA.

3. Environmental management plan (EMP): An instrument that details (a) the measures tobe taken during the implementation and operation of a project to eliminate or offset adverseenvironmental impacts, or to reduce them to acceptable levels; and (b) the actions neededto implement these measures The EMP is an integral part of Category A EAs (irrespectiveof other instruments used). EAs for Category B projects may also result in an EMP.

4. Hazard assessment: An instrument for identifying, analyzing, and controlling hazardsassociated with the presence of dangerous materials and conditions at a project site. TheBank requires a hazard assessment for projects involving certain inflammable, explosive,reactive, and toxic materials when they are present at a site in quantities above a specifiedthreshold level. For certain projects, the EA report may consist of the hazard assessmentalone; in other cases, the hazard assessment is part of the EA documentation.

5. Project area of influence: The area likely to be affected by the project, including all itsancillary aspects, such as power transmission corridors, pipelines, canals, tunnels,relocation and access roads, borrow and disposal areas, and construction camps, as well asunplanned developments induced by the project (e.g., spontaneous settlement, logging, orshifting agriculture along access roads). The area of influence may include, for example, (a)the watershed within which the project is located; (b) any affected estuary and coastal zone;(c) off-site areas required for resettlement or compensatory tracts; (d) the airshed (e.g.,where airborne pollution such as smoke or dust may enter or leave the area of influence; (e)migratory routes of humans, wildlife, or fish, particularly where they relate to public health,economic activities, or environmental conservation; and (f areas used for livelihoodactivities (hunting, fishing, grazing, gathering, agriculture, etc.) or religious or ceremonialpurposes of a customary nature.

6. Regional EA: An instrument that examines environmental issues and impacts associatedwith a particular strategy, policy, plan, or program, or with a series of projects for a particularregion (e.g., an urban area, a watershed, or a coastal zone); evaluates and compares theimpacts against those of alternative options; assesses legal and institutional aspectsrelevant to the issues and impacts; and recommends broad measures to strengthenenvironmental management in the region. Regional EA pays particular attention to potentialcumulative impacts of multiple activities.

7. Risk assessment: An instrument for estimating the probability of harm occurring from thepresence of dangerous conditions or materials at a project site. Risk represents thelikelihood and significance of a potential hazard being realized; therefore, a hazardassessment often precedes a risk assessment, or the two are conducted as one exercise.Risk assessment is a flexible method of analysis, a systematic approach to organizing andanalyzing scientific information about potentially hazardous activities or about substancesthat might pose risks under specified conditions. The Bank routinely requires riskassessment for projects involving handling, storage, or disposal of hazardous materals andwaste, the construction of dams, or major construction works in locations vulnerable toseismic activity or other potentially damaging natural events. For certain projects, the EAreport may consist of the risk assessment alone; in other cases, the risk assessment is partof the EA documentation.

8. Sectoral EA: An instrument that examines environmental issues and impacts associatedwith a particular strategy, policy, plan, or program, or with a series of projects for a specificsector (e.g., power, transport, or agriculture); evaluates and compares the impacts againstthose of alternative options; assesses legal and institutional aspects relevant to the issuesand impacts; and recommends broad measures to strengthen environmental managementin the sector. Sectoral EA pays particular attention to potential cumulative impacts ofmultiple activities.

OP 4.01 -- Annex BJanuary 1999

These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff and are not necessarily acmplete treatment of the subject.

Content of an Environmental AssessmentReport for a Category A Project

1. An environmental assessment (EA) report for a Category A projectl focuses on thesignificant environmental issues of a project. The report's scope and level of detail shouldbe commensurate with the project's potential impacts. The report submitted to the Bank isprepared in English, French, or Spanish, and the executive summary in English.

2. The EA report should include the following items (not necessarily in the order shown):

(a) Executive summary. Concisely discusses significant findings and recommendedactions.

(b) Policy, legal, and administrative framework. Discusses the policy, legal, andadministrative framework within which the EA is carried out. Explains theenvironmental requirements of any co-financiers. Identifies relevant internationalenvironmental agreements to which the country is a party.

(c) Project description. Concisely describes the proposed project and its geographic,ecological, social, and temporal context, including any offsite investments that maybe required (e.g., dedicated pipelines, access roads, power plants, water supply,housing, and raw material and product storage facilities). Indicates the need for anyresettlement plan or indigenous peoples development plan2 (see also subpara. (h)(v)below). Normally includes a map showing the project site and the project's area ofinfluence.

(d) Baseline data. Assesses the dimensions of the study area and describes relevantphysical, biological, and socioeconomic conditions, including any changesanticipated before the project commences. Also takes into account current andproposed development activities within the project area but not directly connected tothe project. Data should be relevant to decisions about project location, design,operation, or mitigatory measures. The section indicates the accuracy, reliability, andsources of the data.

(e) Environmental impacts. Predicts and assesses the project's likely positive andnegative impacts, in quantitative terms to the extent possible. Identifies mitigationmeasures and any residual negative impacts that cannot be mitigated. Exploresopportunities for environmental enhancement. Identifies and estimates the extentand quality of available data, key data gaps, and uncertainties associated withpredictions, and specifies topics that do not require further attention.

(f) Analysis of altematives.3 Systematically compares feasible alternatives to theproposed project site, technology, design, and operation-including the "withoutproject" situation-in terms of their potential environmental impacts; the feasibility ofmitigating these impacts; their capital and recurrent costs; their suitability under localconditions; and their institutional, training, and monitoring requirements. For each ofthe alternatives, quantifies the environmental impacts to the extent possible, andattaches economic values where feasible. States the basis for selecting theparticular project design proposed and justifies recommended emission levels andapproaches to pollution prevention and abatement.

(g) Environmental management plan (EMP). Covers mitigation measures, monitoring,and institutional strengthening; see outline in OP 4.01, Annex C.

(h) Appendixes:

(i) List of EA report preparers-individuals and organizations.

(ii) References-written materials, both published and unpublished, used in studypreparation.

(iii) Record of interagency and consultation meetings, including consultations forobtaining the informed views of the affected people and local nongovernmentalorganizations (NGOs). The record specifies any means other than consultations(e.g., surveys) that were used to obtain the views of affected groups and localNGOs.

(iv) Tables presenting the relevant data referred to or summarized in the main text.

(v) List of associated reports (e.g., resettlement plan or indigenous peoplesdevelopment plan).

Notes:

1. The EA report for a Category A project is normally an environmental impact assessment, withelements of other instruments included as appropriate. Any report for a Category A operation uses thecomponents described in this annex, but Category A sectoral and regional EA require a differentperspective and emphasis among the components. The Environment Sector Board can providedetailed guidance on the focus and components of the various EA instruments.

2. See OP/BP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement (forthcoming), and OD 4.20, Indigenous Peoples.

3. Environmental implications of broad development options for a sector (e.g., altemative ways ofmeeting projected electric power demand) are best analyzed in least-cost planning or sectoral EA.Environmental implications of broad development options for a region (e.g., alternative strategies forimproving standards of living in a rural area) are best addressed through a regional development planor a regional EA. EIA is normally best suited to the analysis of alternatives within a given projectconcept (e.g., a geothermal power plant, or a project aimed at meeting local energy demand),including detailed site, technology, design, and operational altematives.

OP 4.01 -- Annex CJanuary 1999

These policies were prepared for use by Wor/d Bank staff and are not necessarily a.cmlete treatment of the subject.

Environmental Management Plan1. A project's environmental management plan (EMP) consists of the set of mitigation,monitoring, and institutional measures to be taken during implementation and operation toeliminate adverse environmental and social impacts, offset them, or reduce them toacceptable levels. The plan also includes the actions needed to implement thesemeasures.1 Management plans are essential elements of EA reports for Category Aprojects; for many Category B projects, the EA may result in a management plan only. Toprepare a management plan, the borrower and its EA design team (a) identify the set ofresponses to potentially adverse impacts; (b) determine requirements for ensuring that thoseresponses are made effectively and in a timely manner; and (c) describe the means formeeting those requirements.2 More specifically, the EMP includes the followingcomponents.

Mitigation

2. The EMP identifies feasible and cost-effective measures that may reduce potentiallysignificant adverse environmental impacts to acceptable levels. The plan includescompensatory measures if mitigation measures are not feasible, cost-effective, or sufficient.Specifically, the EMP:

(a) identifies and summarizes all anticipated significant adverse environmental impacts(including those involving indigenous people or involuntary resettlement);

(b) describes-with technical details-each mitigation measure, including the type of impactto which it relates and the conditions under which it is required (e.g., continuously or inthe event of contingencies), together with designs, equipment descriptions, andoperating procedures, as appropriate;

(c) estimates any potential environmental impacts of these measures; and

(d) provides linkage with any other mitigation plans (e.g., for involuntary resettlement,indigenous peoples, or cultural property) required for the project.

Monitoring

3. Environmental monitoring during project implementation provides information about keyenvironmental aspects of the project, particularly the environmental impacts of the projectand the effectiveness of mitigation measures. Such information enables the borrower andthe Bank to evaluate the success of mitigation as part of project supervision, and allowscorrective action to be taken when needed. Therefore, the EMP identifies monitoringobjectives and specifies the type of monitoring, with linkages to the impacts assessed in the

EA report and the mitigation measures described in the EMP. Specifically, the monitoringsection of the EMP provides:

(a) a specific description, and technical details, of monitoring measures, including theparameters to be measured, methods to be used, sampling locations, frequency ofmeasurements, detection limits (where appropriate), and definition of thresholds thatwill signal the need for corrective actions; and

(b) monitoring and reporting procedures to (i) ensure early detection of conditions thatnecessitate particular mitigation measures, and (ii) furnish information on the progressand results of mitigation.

Capacity Development and Training

4. To support timely and effective implementation of environmental project components andmitigation measures, the EMP draws on the EA's assessment of the existence, role, andcapability of environmental units on site or at the agency and ministry level.3 If necessary,the EMP recommends the establishment or expansion of such units, and the training ofstaff, to allow implementation of EA recommendations. Specifically, the EMP provides aspecific description of institutional arrangements-who is responsible for carrying out themitigatory and monitoring measures (e.g., for operation, supervision, enforcement,monitoring of implementation, remedial action, financing, reporting, and staff training). Tostrengthen environmental management capability in the agencies responsible forimplementation, most EMPs cover one or more of the following additional topics: (a)technical assistance programs, (b) procurement of equipment and supplies, and (c)organizational changes.

Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates

5. For all three aspects (mitigation, monitoring, and capacity development), the EMPprovides (a) an implementation schedule for measures that must be carried out as part ofthe project, showing phasing and coordination with overall project implementation plans; and(b) the capital and recurrent cost estimates and sources of funds for implementing the EMP.These figures are also integrated into the total project cost tables.

Integration of EMP with Project

6. The borrower's decision to proceed with a project, and the Bank's decision to support it,are predicated in part on the expectation that the EMP will be executed effectively.Consequently, the Bank expects the plan to be specific in its description of the individualmitigation and monitoring measures and its assignment of institutional responsibilities, and itmust be integrated into the project's overall planning, design, budget, and implementation.Such integration is achieved by establishing the EMP within the project so that the plan willreceive funding and supervision along with the other components.

Notes:

1. The management plan is sometimes known as an "action plan". The EMP may be presented as twoor three separate plans covering mitigation, monitoring, and institutional aspects, depending onborrowing country requirements.

2. For projects involving rehabilitation, upgrading, expansion, or privatization of existing facilities,remediation of existing environmental problems may be more important than mitigation andmonitoring of expected impacts. For such projects, the management plan focuses on cost-effectivemeasures to remediate and manage these problems.

3. For projects having significant environmental implications, it is particularly important that there be inthe implementing ministry or agency an in-house environmental unit with adequate budget andprofessional staffing strong in expertise relevant to the project (for projects involving dams andreservoirs, see BP 4.01. Annex B).

Annex 1.2

EA Scope

I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT

1.1 PROJECTDESCRIPT7ONAND PROJECTAREA

This European Investment Bank (EIB) and World Bank financed project proposes:

* the construction of two modem, controlled landfills with appropriate transfer points

in the Jenin and Hebron Districts;* closure of uncontrolled disposal sites in the Jenin and Hebron Districts;

* purchasing collection trucks, bins and related equipment in Jenin, Hebron, Yatta,

Tubas and other Palestinian villages in these two Districts;

* supporting financially collection services and landfill operations;

* providing technical assistance for a large-scale public awareness programme; and

* building institutional capacity in the participating municipalities and at the Ministry

of Environmental Affairs (MEnA).

1.2 NEED FOR PROJECT

West Bank and Gaza has a major solid waste problem, with many municipal

uncontrolled disposal sites scattered throughout the West Bank and Gaza, most ofwhich are simple dumps without site preparation or adequate operational controls.

Actions are needed to more efficiently manage both the collection services and disposal

practices. The project will:

* improve solid waste management collection and disposal practices in the Jenin and

Hebron Districts;* replace open dumping practises with sanitary landfills;

* prevent hazards to the environment and public health and safety;

* promote proper solid waste handling practises;

* improve public awareness of the need for proper solid waste management practises;

and* develop institutional capacity for the management of solid wastes.

The objectives of the Environmental Assessment, Conceptual Design and Tender

Documents for a Solid Waste Management Project in the Jenin and Hebron Districts

are to:

* carry out the required site investigations of the two regional landfills which have

been selected;* prepare a feasibility study for the solid waste management of the two districts served

by these landfills; one will cover the Jenin District in the northern region (Jenin,Tubas and other Palestinian communities), the other the Hebron District in the

southern region (Hebron, Yatta and other Palestinian communities);

* prepare the conceptual design for these landfills, transfer points, and equipment;

* analyse the environmental issues linked to the development of modern solidwaste management and propose adequate mitigation and monitoring measures

ENVIRONNENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT NENAJMETAP/E1B/WoRLD BANK

I

in the areas served by these two landfills; the results will be included in a formalEnvironmental Assessment (EA) Report that will present the analysis of thespecific impacts of the proposed improvements to the waste managementsystems of these two areas; anddevelop tender documents for all project components in order to allow for fast

implementation and operation.

Agreement on the scope of the EA was discussed and developed with inputs from all

parties during the pre-feasibility stage. This document formalises the agreed scope

and asks for final comments from stakeholders prior to development of the EA

programme.

The benefits of the project include reduction of environmental pollution, improved

public health and safety and control of nuisances such as visual impact and loss of

amenity value.

1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS

This phase will build upon the information gathered in the Pre-feasibility Reports and

an BA Reports will be prepared that meets relevant Palestinian and international

legislation. The following activities are required.

Technical, administrative and public consultations on the proposed project.

In close co-operation with the Client, a Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan will be

implemented. The consultation process will build on the consultation programme which

was undertaken during the Pre-feasibility stage. Further details are provided in the

Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PDCP), attached as Annex A to this report.

Recommendation ofpreferred technical design standards, site-specific conceptual

designs, description of baseline conditions, legislative and regulatory requirements,

and analysis of project alternatives.

Project Description

The EAs will utilise the information obtained and developed during the Conceptual

Designs and Feasibility Studies to provide an overall description of project components

focusing on the major issues. The solid waste collection component will include

description of:

* project elements;

* physical layout, social, cultural and economic conditions of the collection areas;

* proposed collection methods;

* pre-implementation activities of public education and involvement;

* costs and cost recovery systems; and

* procurement and implementation plans and operation and maintenance procedures.

The solid waste disposal component will include a description of:

ENVIRONMENTAL RF5OLIRCES MANAGEMENT MENA/METAP,E1B,WoRFLD BANK

2

* physical layout of the overall urban area to be served by disposal facilities;• project elements, including layout of proposed facilities and conceptual design;* the proposed construction schedule, operating plans, closure plans and long-term

monitoring plans;* physical, ecological and demographic setting of facilities;

* the proximity to residential neighbourhoods;* local water resources;* meteorological characteristics; and* economic justification for the project component.

Description ofstakeholder consultations and involvement

The stakeholder consultation programme undertaken during this study and during Pre-feasibility activities with respect to the proposed improvement of waste collection anddisposal will be documented along with key findings and project requirements. Furtherdetails are provided in Annex A.

Description of the Baseline Environmental Conditions.

Environmental baseline data will be evaluated and presented on the relevant of the studyareas. This will document physical, biological and socio-cultural data. The solid wastecollection component will include an assessment of the:

* current collection services;- general conditions of road or walkway access for containers and collection

equipment;* climate and meteorology, as it affects refuse containment and frequency of

collection;* population density and demographic information;* community structure and traditional public involvement processes;* employment and other activities indicating patterns of movement to and from the

neighbourhood;* education level with regard to sanitation and public health; and• customs and attitudes relevant to co-operation with the proposed collection system.

The solid waste disposal component will include information on:

* nature of surrounding land use and proximity to residential areas and otherestablishments;

* demographic character of surrounding neighbourhoods;* road and traffic conditions in the area of the proposed facilities;* topography and visual amenity;* soils and geology;* hydrology and hydrogeology;* climate and meteorology;* air quality;* ecology, flora and fauna;• cultural and historic significance;

EN,vlONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MENA/METAP/EIB/WORLD BANK

3

* education, awareness, and sensitivity of public to proposed siting of facilities; and* public consultation concerns over traffic, insects, noise, dust, odour, smoke, or

aesthetic issues.

Legislative and Regulatory Considerations

The Pre-feasibility Reports describe most of the pertinent regulations and standardsgoverning environmental quality, health and safety, protection of sensitive areas,protection of endangered species, siting, land use control, etc., at international, national,regional and local levels.

Changes to the legislative and regulatory framework will be documented andrecommendations for completing and strengthening the legal and institutionalframework with regards to solid waste management and implementation of projectcomponents will be provided. These recommendations will take into account on-goinginitiatives for legislative and regulatory development.

Analysis ofAlternatives to the Proposed Project.

The 'Draft Masterplan of the Pre-Feasibility Reports looked at several alternatives andkey issues. The Consultants will review this work and summarize for the collection,transfer stations and landfill operations, the alternative design concepts. Thealternatives will be considered in terms of potential environmental impacts; capital andoperating costs; suitability under local conditions; and institutional, training, andmonitoring requirements.

Detailing the major environmental improvements and risks associated with thecollection and disposal investment components of the project

The scope of the Pre-Feasibility study did not include a specific review of the potentialpositive and negative impacts associated with the introduction of improved solid wastecollection scheme in the Districts of Jenin and Hebron. This will be undertaken in theEA study and will include consideration of.

* impacts on land use;* odour impacts;* traffic impacts;* noise impacts;* visual impacts;* impacts on public health impacts;* impacts on local employment; and* general impacts associated with citing waste collection containers.

The Pre-feasibility Reports present a detailed analysis of the major positive andnegative impacts relating to the development of the proposed landfill sites. Key impactswill be further reviewed and assessment of additional baseline information, such as thatdetermined during the site investigation programme, will be carried out. The followingwill be addressed.

ENVIKONMENTAL REsOURCES MANAGENIENT MENA/METAP/EIB/WORLD 3ANK

4

* impact on land-use;* impacts on ground and surface waters;* impacts on flora and fauna;

* socio-economic impacts;* impacts on traffic;* impacts on air and noise;

* aesthetic impacts;* impacts on cultural heritage; and* impacts on labour and employment

Preparing environmental mitigation and management plans for each investmentcomponent, including environmental monitoring programmes, as well as pragmaticinstitutional strengthening and training.

The Pre-feasibility Reports outline a preliminary set of mitigation measures. These willbe further developed to take account site-specific impacts identified in theEnvironmental Assessment and the conceptual design and feasibility study.

The mitigation measures for the landfills will include conceptual design standards and

initial/preliminary design layouts for the impermeable liner system, the leachatemanagement/treatment system and the landfill gas management system and will include

draft staff plans for the construction and operations contractor.

A plan detailing the necessary environrnental monitoring for the proposed projectcomponents during construction and operation will be developed. This will documentthe nature and frequency of the monitoring required. For the landfill sites,

environmental monitoring will include a schedule of regular monitoring for keyindicators of contamination. The parameters, frequency for each indicatormeasurement, minimum detection limits, acceptable numerical monitoring levels,quality assurance/quality control procedures and other technical data will be described.

An estimate of capital and operating costs and a description of other inputs (such asinstitutional changes and staff resources) needed to implement the mitigation andmonitoring plan will be provided.

Institutional Strengthening to Supervise Environmental Mitigation.

The authority and capability of institutions at local, regional, and national level and the

recommended steps to strengthen these organisations will be discussed, and will linkwith on-going initiatives currently developing the institutional framework forenvironmental protection in the West Bank.

1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS

Each of the EA Reports will be self-contained, concise and limited to significantenvironmental issues. This report will build upon the Pre-Feasibility Reports completedpreviously, and integrate the results of all additional work. The main text will focus onfindings, justifications, conclusions and recommended actions, supported by sunimaries

ENVIRONMFNTAL RESOuRCES MANAGENENT MENAfMETAP/EIB/WORLD BANK

5

of the data collected and citations for any references used in interpreting these data.Details will be given in Appendices to the main reports. The EA Reports will have thefollowing format:

Main Report

* Executive Summary;* Policy, Legal and Admninistrative Framework;* Description of Proposed Project (including description of each project component);

* Environmental Baseline Data (including stakeholder consultations);

* Significant Environmental Impacts;* Analysis of Alternatives; and* Envirorunental Management Plan (EMP)

-Environmental Mitigation Measures-Environmental Monitoring Plan, and-Institutional Training and Strengthening to Supervise Implementationof the EMP

Appendices

* List of personnel involved in EA preparation;* References;• Record of Interagency/ForumlConsultation Meetings; and

* Detailed Data, Analysis, and Justification.

1.5 DATA, LOCAL SERviCES, PERSONNEL TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT

The Client will continue to:

e ensure free access to all existing data and to waste management operations and

facilities in West Bank and Gaza; and• provide liaison and contacts with the Municipalities in the regions under study and

other interested parties (such as Ministries and NGO's), and assist the Consultants intheir relations with the local authorities. In particular the client will play an intrinsicpart of the public consultation programme as identified in the PCDP attached asAnnex A.

ENVIRONMNTAL RESOURCES MANAGEENT MENAMETAPMEB/WoRLD BANK

6

Annex 1.3

EA Preparers and Contributors

ANNEX 1.3

LIST OF EA PREPARERS

Chaplin ERM EA Specialist and HydrogeologistDisselkoen ERM SWM SpecialistEdge ERM Landfill Design Engineer and EA ReviewerFilfel ERM Community Development SpecialistBarghouti ERM Ecological SpecialistFletcher ERM Project DirectorQleibo ERM Cultural and Religious Heritage ExpertKhourry ERM Legal SpecialistTiti ERM Environmental Sanitation SpecialistZonneveld ERM Public Consultations SpecialistSaid ERM Data CollectorSadeq ERM Data Collector

ANNEX 1.3 (continued)

LIST OF EA CONTRIBUTORS (CONSUL TEES)

Abu Daher Ministry of Environmental Affairs

Abu Jalala Ministry of Environmental AffairsAbu Saffiyah Minister of Environmental Affairs

Al Arraj Ministry of Local GovernmentsBarghouthi and others Palestinian Water Authority

Barrett Saqqa and Khoudary Consulting Engineers

Ezzeldin Municipality of 'Arrabe

Hmeidi Ministry of Environmental AffairsLahham Ministry of Environmental Affairs

Manasreh Governor of JeninMansour Municipality of Jenin

Najjar Ministry of Environmental AffairsNissar Ministry of Local GovernmentsNusseiba Jerusalem Water Commission

Rabbi Palestinian Hydrology GroupRimawi Ministry of Environmental AffairsRotstein Geophysical Institute of Israel

Sansur Birzeit UniversitySaqqa Saqqa and Khoudary Consulting Engineers

Scarpa Water and Soil Environment. Research Unit, BethlehemUniversity, 1998

Shapira Geophysical Institute of IsraelSharif Arab Centre for Engineering Studies

Shawahne Municipality of Jenin

Additional information was provided by the:

Ministry of Planning and International Co-operation

Ministry of Transport and Meteorological OfficeGeological Survey of IsraelIsraeli Hydrology CentreIsraeli Department of Environmental Affairs for the West Bank.

Ministry of Local GovernmentCEP-SADAT-ECODIT Consultants Team for Institutional Capacity Building Project

Joint Services Council for Solid Waste Management in JeninSolid Waste Management Council in the Gaza Strip Central Area

Municipality of GazaSocial Scientists Network in Palestine - Social Assessment Team for World Bank

World Bank

Annex 2.1

Article 12 - OSLO II InterimAgreement

ISRAELI-PALESTINIANINTERIM AGREEMENT

ON THE WEST BANKAND THE GAZA STRIP

WASHINGTON, SEPTEMBER 28,1995

ARTICLE 12Enivironinieiital Protectioni

A. Tiransfer of Autliority

'Ilie Palestiniianl sidle anid Israel, recogliizling the nieed to protect thle enivironiiilenit aiidto utilize natiural resouirces oni a sustainable basis, agreed uipon the followinig:

1. Tlls splhere includes, jilter alia, licenising for- cralls anld inIdILstry, anldeniviroiinmenital aslects ot' tile following: sewage, soli(d waste, water, pestCOlItlOI (illcliding aniti-miialaria activities), pesticides and liazardlotissubstanices, planniing anid zoninig, noise control, air pollitioni, public hiealthl,niiilig and qLuarryinlg, landscape preservation anid foocl prodIuctioll.

2. Thlie Israeli side sliall traiislir to tlhe Palestiniiani side, anld the lPalestillialn sideshall asstiuiie, powers and responsibilities in tilis sphere, in the West Banik anidthe Gaza Strip thiat are presenitly liekl by the Israeli sidle, ilncluding powersand responsibilities in Area C whlicil are niot relatedl to territory.

In Area C, powers ail(l reslponsibilities in thlis sphere related to terlitoly(wilicI onlly incIlIde enivironimiienital aspects ol sewage, solicd waste, pestici(lesanld hazardouis suibstances, planniiiiig anld zoning, air l)ollittion, mininlg alndqLiailyinig, and lali(lscape preservation) will be tiratis err-ed graduially toPalestiniian jurisdictioni that will cover- West Banik and(i Gaza Stril) terr-itolyexcept for the issues that will be negoliate(l in the l)ermlfanent statLisnegotiationis, dULilig (lic Irlltheri redeploymiient phases, to be completed witlin18 iiotilis froi the date of ilte inauguirationi of tlie Coulicil.

13. Coopeiration a1hi(1 Uii(leI-staii(ilgs

3. Botli sicles wvill strive to ultilize anid ex)loiit the niatiral resotirces, lpLirsilanlt totlieir owvin enviroilmental and(I developmental policies, in a mInatlielr Whichslhall preveilt dalaiage to the eniviroililiinnt, and shllISII take all necessarymiieasur-es to elIsuLre tlhat activities in tlieir respective areas do 1lot cadUsedaimage to the environiiment of thle othier si(le.

4. Each sidle shiall act loor the lprotectioll ol't he elivironmient and the prevent ionof environmental risks, llazards an(d nuisanIces inIcIlKding all kinids of soil,water anld air l)ollt1tiol1.

5. Botli sides shiall respectively adopt, apply and enistire comll)liance witliinternationally recoginized standa(lrds conIIcrinig tile lollowinig: levels of

pollutants discharged tlhrotught emliissionis anid eflAuenlts: acceptable levels oft1CatMent ol soli(d an11d li(qicld wvastes, and agtreed ways, atid miieanis for disposalof'stch scvClsts; tihc llsc, handling anid tranisportation (in accordance witlh thleprovisions of Arliclc 38 (Transportation)) and storage of hazardoussubstai ices and wvastes (iniciteling pesticides, insecticides a ad lherbicides); anidstanal(lrds [or thle prevention anid abatemlenit of nioise, odlor-, pests and otlhernuisances, wvihichi imay affect tlle oilier side.

6. EIach si(le shall take ilte necessary anid appropriate measures to prevenit thieiiieoi it.rolledI disclharge of' Wastewater andl/or effluenlts to water sources,wvater systemlis amd water bo(lies, inicludinig grouLndwater, surface water anidrivers, wlhiclh imiay affect tihe otlier side, and to proiiiote the proper treatmlenitof' domesic and industrial Wastewater, as well as solid anid lhazardouswvastes.

7. Bothl sides skall enlsurte that a comiiprelhenisive Envirolinental ImlpactAssessmcnit (lLhA) shiall be condtiucted lfor major developmiienit programs,illclutlinIg tlhis lehaktd to illdtlustlial parks anid otlher programiis detailed inScliecditile.

8. Liollt sides recognize the iiportlance ol establisliinig niew inidustrial planits intlhcir resp)ective areas within l)lallnned andl alpproved inidustrial zonies, subjectto the preparation ol coiiipt)rehleisive ElAs, anid slhall elndeavor to enisuLecomnplianice witlh the above.

9. 13otli si(des recogllize tihe importance of takiing all ilecessary precautions tol)revellt water and soil p)ollutioll, as well as otlher safely hazards in theirrespective areas, as a resultt of thie storage anid use of gas anid petroletupro(lucts, and shall enideavor to enisure coimiplianice witli thec above.

10. IPeiidinlg the establishment of appr-opr-iate alterinative sites by the Palestitnianside, disl)osal of' clheiiical aiid radioactive wastes will be onily to theciuthlorized sites in Israel, in comiiplianice wiltll existillg proceules in thesesites. 'Ille construcioll, operation anid maintenanwce of thie alter-niative facilitieswiIIllow ifitcriHatiomially accepted g,uiclelines, anid will be im-plementtedpur suant to thle p)reparationl of ElAs.

11. 13othi sides shiall cool)erate in ilimp)lemiientinig the ways anid iineatis requiled toprevellt nloise, (lust anid otlher nulisanices fiomii quarTies, wlhiclh imay affect theotlier side. Tro tlis en (d the Palestiniani side shall take all niecessary anidapprol)priate i measu-rcs, in accordance witlh the provisionis of tlis Agreemilenit,against aniy quarry that delos niot imieet the relevanit enivironmllienital stanidar-ds.

12. 13oth1 sides recogiize the ilmportance of takiiig all iiecessaiy anld apppropriateiiicasurcs in thleir resp)ective areas lor the miioniitorinig anid colitrol of inisect-traiisiiiittced discases iIluCinli)g sanid flies, aiioplieles aicd all othier miosquiltos)ccies, and slaIll enideavor to ensure compliance witli t(ie above.

13. IJoth sidles shall cooperate iii iniulemientinig initerinationially accepted principlesMI id StaiIlcns eClatinlg o CllVironieincital issues of global conicerii, sucil as thieprotection of tlle ozonle layer.

14. Israel anid hlie 1'alestiniiani sidle shall coopeiate in iiiipleiiienitinig principles andstandards, wviicil shiall conlform xvili initeniiationially accepted principles anicdstallidards, coiIcernlii ig the pmrotection of enldanigered species amid of wild fauniani,id flora, jimlinldilg reshliction of trade, coniservationi of iniigratory species ofwvildlilf and prCesclrvation 01 existinlg fIrests anidi nature reserves.

15. Israel and the Palestinian side shiall respectively opel-ate ani emiiergenicyvar-miilg sysiciii in order to respond to evenits or accidenits whiicih imay

genier-ate civironmnental p)ollutionl, damiiage or lhazards. A mechanism formllutiual iotificatiomm and( coordincationi ini cases of suchi evenits or accideiits willbe establisicd.

I 7. Each si(le shiall prolilote public awareness oni civiroiinenital issues.

1 8. I3otli sides shall wvork oni appropriate inieasures to coiilbat decertilicationi.

19. Eachl sidle shiall control and i molnitor the transfer of pesticides alid anyiiter-ialltially bained anid Iresticted chemliciCals in thleir respective areas.

20. Each sidle sh-all reimlblurse the otliei lob- emivironiiieiital services granited in thefiamieNvork ol niiutually agreed programis.

2 1. t3oth sidcs shiall cooperate in the carryinig out of enivironiliienital studies,inCluILdinlg a p)ro0ile, in the West Banik.

22. For the mltliLual beniefit of botli sides, the relevanit Israeli autilorities anid iltePalestinian Emivironninental Protection Authlor-ity and/or otlher relevalntPalestilnia authorities shall cooperate in difTerenit fields in the iulutre.

Bothi sides will establishi ai Eniviroiniiienital Exper-ts Coimimlittee forenviroiiiflelital cooperation and unlderstanidinlgs.

Annex 3.1

Leachate Analysis Results

16./05/20007:46. CEOHS BIRZEIT UHIUERSITY 4 'q>,1,59j 181 D,5

* ' Center For Environmental &PS/ISO (Sude 25 A.ccreclned )hncOZ-t8z 10/ Zctiaz i-l-t- SCO>

Fax 02-z98 Z 1 66

Anativical ReportLeached Water Samples

OtGgin of Sample : Jenn DumpsiTeBrought by Ramez EltitiReceived by Aymaui SKhairContainer type Glass

Analy.'s.w:pH - 6.946 Zn = 3I6rng;LTurbidity =>1000.0 NTUJ COD =) 2 127. 0 rg U2';

Caxbonate(CaCOf) = 3505.0 mIg/L 3OD 1-500. 0mgO02!L;Conductvity = l8.33 mS Nitrate 121,9 TIg/TDS ar IJ2OC =177 70.0mg/Total Kjeldabl Nitrogeni, 525.0 mgiL as (Am.monia.)TSS at l150C - 2410.Omg/LSulfate = 48 0 mg/bAmmonium - 238.0 mg/LCa - 3'J3.0 mglLMdg = 350.10 irg/1bci - 3768.0 mg/LCd - Not DetectedCT Total 0.2 mg/LCr (=6) N-ot DetectedCu - 2.8 Ing/Fe 46.1 mg/LMin 1.7ng/LNi 0 2 mng/L

The Center is responsible for the sample received.

Signature,

Ramzi Sa.n Ph.:3 mFN ,> i EGabi Abu Sadla, PTh.DDi:rect:or Plead of ESU

** U Jnreliable results; 1imittsap1e size prevenited making duplicates.

P.O.Box: 14 BIRZSETT, PALESTINE . PHONE +9t72-2-9982010 . FAX: +972-299821i6Ema il'fc,Qsbre!@JL

16&*05 200] 07J 46 CEOHS BIRFZEIT 1_3IN1I.ERFITY -# DL-728SE1551 N--I. lt, f

Center For Environmental[ &BEIFZEIT UNIVERSITY Occupotional Health Sciences

EXS/TSO O,aide 25 Accredited I}hone, 02-29S20 10/ :18 I O3

ABA]yfica ReortLeached Water Samnies

Sonrcc . RJ4- COnsultingH Pit-rn, nThalus

Origin of Samiiple : Arraba )uinpsite'Brought By : Ramez EltitiReceived by Ay:mnan KhairContainer type : Glass

A nalysis;pH 75 42 Zn = _$ mgL'Turbidity =>1000,0 NTU COD = 32775.0 mg 0 2; LCarbonate (CaCO3 ) 8=)030n mgfl BOD 10479.0 mg O,,iLConductivlty = 33.4 mS Nitrate = 3 3.0 ng/LTDS at 1800C =29825.0tmgLTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2117.0 mg/b as (Ammonia)TSS at 1030C 3680,0 mg/LSulfate - 0.0 mg/L

Ammonium W991.0 mg/LCa = 746.5 mg/L|Mg = 426.0 mg/LC = 4191.0 mOgLCd = Not DetectedCr Total 0.3 mg/LCr (=6) Not DetectedCul 0.3 mg/LFe = 7224 mg/L

Mn = 1.8 mg/LNi 0.5 mg/L

The Center is responsible for die sample received.

Signature.,

Ramzi SA1IPhD '. Gabi AbL Sada. Ph.DDiector 1 lead of FSU

PO0.Box: 14 BIRZE1T, PALESTINE * P1ONE: +972-2-998201 *L'Ax: +972-_-9962 166Email: cechs'hbrieiWjl

16.'05 2000 077:46 CEOHS BIF-EIT UHII')EFSITY - 9072E6E0551 IE. 1,J 1;054Center For Environmentol &

BIRZEIT UNIVERSITY Occupationol Heolth SciencesPSCESO Otddc 23 A.ccredited Phone: 02-29820 01 2982102

Ljeacied Wfater Samples

Date of Report 27/4/2000Sample Code # 00-254C)ate Receivea 20/4/2000Source ERM - Consulting Fin:n. NablusOrigin of Sample Gabba DuxnpsiteBrouglht By Rainez EltitiReceived by Ayman lKbairContaineT type Glass

A na8Sis:+pHd - 7.618 Zn 4. 1 mgfLTurbidity =>1000.ONTU COD 33281.Orn C/PLCarbonate (CaCO_)t 10948.0 Tmg/L B OD 12425.0 mg UiLConductivity 38.9 mS Nitrate 1 l l 0 r00g/b1L

TDS at 1l800C - 34285,0 gI/LTotal .Kjeldahl NiLTFgei = 2178.0 mg/L as (Ammonia)TSS at O50C = 4140.0 mg/LSulfate - 40.0 mg/bAmmonium 2117.0 mg/LCa 51 0.0 mg/LMg 395.0mg/LCl = 6477.0 mgLCd Not DetectedCi( Total = 0.4 mgfLCr (=6) Not DetectedCu 0.9 mg/LFe - 25.3mg/VLMin 1.2 mglLNi _ 0.4 mngL

The Center is responsible for tlle sample Teceived.

Signature.

Ramzi San )hD .. , Gabr Abu Sada, Ph.DDireotor Head of FSM

P.O.Box: 14 BmRZEIT. PALESTINTr: , PHONE. +972-2-9982010 . FAX: -'-972-2-998216EEmll all: tc, e,o, hs tS,bizriz,.,ci;, .cdi.

Annex 3.2

Detailed Collection and TransferDesign

Annex 3.2

Detailed Collection and Design Proposals

Key points to note:

1. Current data as in April 2000, except for the population data and waste arisings bothgiven in 2002 projections;

2. Currently available containers have been mentioned under 'current equipment'

Cluster 1: NW NORTH-WEST* Proposed service level: Current situation improved.

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled per community:

Zububa 750 kg (11 containers; pay NIS 15 (NIS 12)); 1866 peopleAnin 1450 kg (16 cont., pay NIS 10), 3267 peopleTinnik 400 kg (pay NIS 0); 962 peopleRumana 1350 kg (tractor trailer (1990); 20 containers; NIS 15), 2961 peopleA-Taybah 950 kg (pay NIS 10), 2096 peopleAs Saaida 50 kg (pay NIS 0); 111 people

* Collection need is 4950 kilo total per large semi-mountainous area; residential areas inArea B, remote areas in Area C. Population in 2002: 11,263 in 1936 households (6.82average family size); 0.44 kg/cap/day; 280 establishments (ratio households overestablishments 6.91) that could cover between 22-25% of the SWM fees;

* Distance to landfill is 22 km (from Anin via Yabad) or 25 km from (Tinnik via Jenin);from Anin to Zububa is just over 1 0 km.

* Zububa: 305 households; 14 shops, 2 restaurants, 6 workshops, I factory, 0 petrol stations,0 office, 2 clinics, 4 schools/kindergarten, 10 farnms and 2 mosques: in total 41establishments (ratio 8.44, over the whole area it is estimated at 8.1) the 1866 people inthis 13.8 sq.km town live mainly from agriculture though there are no large wells; there isa village council; current dump at public land near the village

* Anin covers 16 square kilometer, has 3267 people in 569 households; it has a strongcommunity sense; 6 wells for olives as main crop; 2 schools; I mosque.

* Tinnik is large with 32.3 square kilometer but only 962 people in 155 households (in2002), agriculture main source of income, one elementary school, one mosque.

* Rumana is 21.7 square kilometers without water wells; cattle raising is the source ofincome for 2961 people in 514 households (average family size 5.8).

e Current equipment: I compactor 3.5 cubic metre, 1 tractor, 47 containers; 2x/wk; truck issuitable for the internal village roads as it is small; collection done twice weekly.

* Electricity supplied by regional supplier, bill could be vehicle for SWM fee.- People accept fees and commit for paying; SWM fee raise is said to be acceptable if

necessary.

Proposed scheme:* Secondary collection frequency becomes 3 times per week within cost structure;* Primary collection: no cleanser is foreseen in the urban parts; no full primary collection,

but Tractor-Trailer supplies some form of PC;* Compactor trips to landfill 2x per day Compactor loads arriving at the landfill site around

9:30 and 13:00; : I driver (8 hours) + 2 collectors (6.5 hours);* Tractor-Trailer for kerbside collection in Rumana and Al Taybah and secondary collection

in remote areas served by 20 cubic metre container 2x (3x) per week collected; 1-2 tractorloads per day depending on the collection area during 6 days; I driver + 1 collector (both6.5 hours);

* the RoRo container with ramp will be located at the old site of As Saaida.

Procurement* Needed additionally: lx trailer; 25 containers; I roro container + ramp; 2 handearts; TA;* Replacements: same scheme, expanded in accordance with population growth/needs:2002: new tractor;2006: 1 compactor truck 8 cubic metre, 80 containers, I trailer;2012-2013: Itractor-trailer, 100containers;2014: compactor 8 cubic metre

Cluster 2: N-SH NORTH Silit Al Harhiyya* Proposed service level: Current situation but intensified

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled: Silit Al Harthiyya alone: 4350 kg, pay NIS 10; in 2002

there will be 8644 people in 1421 households, 157 shops, 5 restaurants, 23 workshops, 2factories, 2 petrol stations, I office, 10 clinics, 8 schools/kindergarten, 30 farms and 5mosques: in total 242 establishments (ratio 5.87); mountainous area, almost fully Area A.

* Population in 2002: 8,644 in 1421 households (6.08 average family size); 0.50 kg/cap/day;the 242 establishments ( ratio households over establishments 5.87) could cover over 25%of the SWM fees;

* Distance to landfill is 25 km; compactor rides daily 130 km.* Current equipment: I compactor 3.5 cubic metre, 30 containers; 3 handcarts; 2x/week

Proposed scheme* Secondary collection 3x per week;* One men in primary collection could be phased out by community participation, the other

becomes collector at the compactor truck;* compactor loads arriving at the landfill site 2x per day around 9:30 and 13:00; 2/3 of the

compactor truck go to secondary collection 1/3 to haulage; the driver makes 1.2 workingday, the two collectors 1.00;

* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;• efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement• Needed additionally: 35 containers; 3 handcarts; technical assistance* Replacement:2007: 1 compactor 8 cubic metre, 80 containers2014: 1 compactor 8 cubic metre, 100 containers

Cluster 3: N-Yam NORTH Al-Yamoun* Proposed scheme: Current situation improved

Baseline* Al Yamoun: Waste generation to be handled: 8750 kg, pay NIS 10; scheme does not yet

include Khirbet Sorooj 20 kg/day so neglectible; mountainous area almost fully Area A.Al Yamoun has urban like characteristics (with two very densely populated areas) but alsomany olive farms in their 20.4 square kilometers; there are springs and wells, only oneclinic but numerous medical doctors practicing from their own unit; the local society wasfounded in 1966;

* Population in 2002: 14,614 in 2266 households (6.45 average family size); 0.60kg/cap/day; 380 establishments (5.96 ratio) in Al Yamoun that could cover 24-27% of therequired SWM fees;

* Current equipment: I compactor 9 cubic metre, 3 handcarts; 2 tractors part-time, I from1990; 22 containers; collection 2x/week; part densely populated;

Proposed scheme* Secondary collection 3x per week; compactor to landfill lx per day; when truck goes to

landfill;• driver makes I working day, the two collectors start cleaning around the containers in a

weekly scheme;* roro container from current Tennik dump 4x per week to new landfill; and* 3 carts and one tractor for primary collection;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;- technical assistance and training;- monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement- Needed additionally: I tractor (replacement) with feature; 80 containers; lx trailer, lx 20

cubic metre container ; technical assistance;* Replacement:2006: 1 compactor 12 cubic metre; 2x20 cubic metre container; 150 containers;2010: 1 tractor-trailer; 2x 20 cubic metre containers; 2014 compactor.

Cluster 4: N-KD NORTH Kufr Dan* Proposed scheme: Current situation improved

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled: Kufr Dan alone: 2250 kg,* Inhabitants (2002) 4493 people in 842 households (relatively small families of 5.34), with

130 establishments (ratio 6.48) that could cover 25-27% of the SWM fees;* People pay NIS 10-15 via electricity bill;* Economic resources: Watered planting by hand and watered planting by rain, plastic

houses;* Current equipment: 1 tractor trailer (1996); collection 2x/week;* Mountainous area now fully Area A;. 4493 people living in 842 households (5.3 family size, relatively low compared to 6),

living in 7.3 sq. km town with 4 wells, 50 farms, one clinic and a local society since 1981;* Head of Village Council: Eng. Allam Marai, tel.062.434.666;* Willingness to pay: villagers are willing to pay and do so in near 1 00% way.

Proposed scheme:* Secondary collection 3x per week by 2 Tractor-trailers: I driver + I collector each of 2

tractors;• roro container to landfill Sx/week from the traditional Kufr Dan dump;* no cleansers, no containers;* increased community participation;* routing plan at fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement:* Needed additionally: Ix trailer; lx 20 cubic metre roro containers + ramp; TA;. Replacement:2006: 2x tractor trailer, lx 20 cubic metre container;2011: 2x 20 cubic metre container2017: 2x tractor-trailer, 2x 20 cubic metre container;;

Cluster 5: C-Bur CENTRE Burqin* Proposed scheme: Current situation expanded

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled. Total 3,900 kg in large area:

Burqin currently alone: 2600 kg, pay NIS 10; 5175 people; 904 householdsKufr Qud 300 kg, NIS 0, 797 people in 127 householdsAl Hashimiyya 350 kg, NIS 0, 830 people in 138 householdsAl Arqa 750 kg; NIS 0; 1866 people in 280 households

• The 904 households in Burqin (1449 in total) are combined with 88 shops, 8 restaurants,26 workshops, 6 factories, 1 petrol station, I office, 5 clinics, 6 schools/kindergarten, 46farms (and 150 regular agricultural entities not counted) and 3 mosques: in total 191establishments (ratio 4.73);

* For the entire Cluster there is a production of 4000 kg daily; the ratio householdsestablishments is 5.5 or 1450 households and 260 establishments, so establishments couldcontribute 26-29%;

* Burqin is 270m above S.L., 19.400 square kilometer;* Economic sources: agriculture, cattle raising, labour abroade Current equipment: 1 compactor 9 cubic metre, 1 tractor (1990), 2xlweek in a

mountainous area now fully Area A.

Proposed scheme* Population needs to pay the full real costs for this expensive scheme, or the 9 cubic metre

compactor will be exchanged and service will be brought to the affordable level;* Secondary collection 3x per week by compactor; there is spare time for the compactor

truck as input in other areas or to serve as backup in other clusters;• tractor for primary/secondary collection; trips to landfill lx per day; 20 cubic metre

container 3x per week to landfill from the traditional Burqin site, 1 km south of JeninCamp served by UNRWA;

* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;- efficiency improvements;- full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;• monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional: tractor-trailer; 50 small containers; lx 20 cubic metre container +

ramp; technical assistance;* Replacement (towards a more efficient scheme):2007: 3.5 cubic metre compactor, 75 containers + lx 20 cubic metre

containers;2011: TT;2014: Compactor 8 cubic metre; 100 containers .

Cluster 6: NNE NORTH NORTH EAST* Current situation seriously improved

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled, in total 2150 kg:

Al Jalama 800 kg. pay NIS 10; daily collection; 2024 people, 385 householdArRama 750 kg, 30 containers; pay NIS 10, 792 people, 121 householdArrabuna 300 kg, NIS 7.5; 751 people, 126 householdDayr Ghazaleh 300 kg, NIS 8; 750 people, 144 household

* Current equipment: Ix 3.5 cubic metre compactor; 32 containers;* Daily secondary collection;* Large area but not mountainous;* residential areas mostly Areas B, not densely populated areas in Area C;* In ArRama (792 people in 121 households) cattle raising and agriculture are the main

sources of income; there are 2 schools in a 4.8 km2 area;* In Arrabuna (751 people in 126 households) there are two schools, an area size of 6.8

square kilometers;* Al-Jalama; Village Council; tel: 062 434 190; Head VC: Khaled Abu Farah; 30 containers;

current dump at public land of the village; 2 schools in the village;* Regional electricity supply via regional with bill that could be used as vehicle for SWM

fee;* Establishments could contribute over 20% to total SWM fees;

Economic resources agriculture by irrigation and rainfall; greenhouses;- Great willingness to pay;

Proposed scheme- Daily by compactor truck;- could be preferably 3x per week, more efficient. Making the scheme more cost-efficient

and having the vehicle shared (less costly) with other community;e cleansing around the container by truck staff and public;e increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;- efficiency improvements;- full cost-recovery;• technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional: 20 containers;. Replacement:

2007: compactor 3.5 cubic metre (replacing it by a TT is not accepted by public) + 75 cont;2014: again.

Cluster 7: NE NORTH EAST* Current situation seriously improved

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled:

Faqqua 1380 kg, pay NIS 10; 3066 people in 519 households (*)Barghasa 25 kg, 64 people in 11 householdsKhirbet Abu Anqqar neglectible;

* Total 1400 kg in mountanous area,* Area B and C.* There are 530 households, 24 shops, 2 restaurants, 7 workshops, 3 factories, I petrol

stations, 0 office, 3 clinics, 3 schools or kindergarten, 10 farms and 2 mosques: total 55establishments (ratio 9.64);

* Establishments could contribute upto 20% to total SWM fees;* Current equipment: I tractor trailer (1990);* Kerbside and secondary collection 2x/week;

Proposed scheme* Secondary collection 3x per week by Tractor Trailer;* roro 4x per week to landfill from the Jalbun site;e increased community participation;* routing plan at fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional: I tractor trailer (replacement), lx 20 cubic metre roro containers and

no ramp (already in Jalbun scheme); technical assistance;* Replacement:2006: lx 20 cubic metre container2011: tractor trailer + 2x 20 cubic metre container,2017: 2x 20 cubic metre container

Cluster 8: ENE EAST NORTH EAST* Current situation expanded

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled:Jalbun 1000 kg; NIS 8Beit Qad 300 kg; NIS 8Mashra Beit Qad 150 kg, NIS 8Increased area:Um Qabub 30 kg, NIS 0Al Jameelat (negligible),Aba 50 kg, NIS 0Wad Al Dabi 150 kg;* Total 1700 kg;* About 10 km length from Jenin* Mountains,* Area B and C.* Agriculture is the main source of income.* Current equipment: Contractor's equipment (written off); 2x/week;

Proposed scheme* Secondary collection 3x per week by Tractor Trailer;* roro 3x per week to landfill;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing plan at fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional: I tractor trailer (replacem.); lx roro container+ ramp; TA;• Replacement:2003: 1 x Tractor Trailer;2006: 20 cubic metre container;2011: I x Tractor Trailer + l x 20 cubic metre container,2013: lx Tractor Trailer;2016: 2x 20 cubic metre container;

Cluster 9: NE-DAD NORTH EAST Deir Abu Dif* Current situation improved

Baseline* Waste generation to be handled: Deir Abu Dif 2350 kg alone;* 12.9 square kilometers;* agriculture is main source of income;* 1 mosque, 2 schools, a local society funded in 1983;* six kilometers east of Jenin Town,* almost entirely in Area A.* Current scheme: lx 3.5 cubic metre compactor + lx tractor trailer (1996); 2x/week house-

to-house;* an expensive scheme of 2 refuse vehicles for only 4,600 people; establishments could

contribute 19-23% to the total of the SWM fees;* mountainous urban area in Area A.

Proposed scheme* This collection scheme remains expensive: 6x per week by 2 precious, sophisticated and

costly pieces, but citizens need to pay the full real costs, otherwise the level of the servicewill be lowered by sharing the compactor with another cluster;

* roro 2x per week to landfill from the current dumpsite, but equipment will be used byClusters 6-8 and 10-12 in emergencies;

* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;• full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional: lx 20 cubic metre containers + ramp + 40 containers + TA. Replacement:2006: Ix tractor trailer + lx 20 cubic metre container;2007: 1 x Compactor 3.5 + 60 containers;2012: Ix 20 cubic metre container;2014: Ix Comp 3.5 + 90 containers;2016: IxTT;2018: Ix 20 cubic metre container.

Cluster 10: EAST* Current situation phased out

Baseline* Waste handled from:

Al Mughair 800 kg, NIS 0;Al Muttila 100 kg, NIS 0;Jalqamus 700 kg, NIS 15; 1640 people in 260 households;3x Khirbets [Sabain,MaraRaha,Kharruba]:50 kg together, NIS 0;Um AlTut 350 kg, NIS 0;

* Total 2000 kg* One of the largest clusters: 50 square kilometer;* Areas A (50%), B and C;* 5-15 km southeast of Jenin Town;* 300m-350 above S.L.;* Sources of income: agriculture, dairy products and cattle raising are the main forms;* There are 260 households in Jalqamus, 17 shops, 2 workshops, 1 office, 2 medical

facilities, 3 educational ones, I greenhouse and I mosques: in total 27 establishments(ratio 9.63, in the entire area it is 9.25);

* Organization form: Village Council; tel: 059 203 538; Head of the Council: Nafez MousaAmin El Hajj;

* Current equipment: 13 containers; Compactor 3.5 cubic metre; dump at Al-Mittalh;* Electricity supply by the Council generator; bill could function as vehicle for SWM fees;* Current SWM fee 10 NIS monthly; establishments could contribute 16-20% to the total

SWM fee;- Economic resources: Agriculture, labour abroad;- People accept the fees and are committed to pay;• The truck is suitable for the internal village roads as it is small; the car reaches the paved

roads;* Collection on unpaved by the people themselves bringing waste to the closest container;* Collection done three times weekly;

Current equipment: lx compactor 3.5 cubic metre, 13 containers

Needed equipment: 25 containers

* Scheme becomes: 3x per week, truck not used full-time;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Replacement:2006: lx compactor 3.5 cubic metre + 50 containers;2011: 75 containers;2013: lx Compactor 8 cubic metre;2017: 100 containers

Cluster 11: C-Q CENTER QABATIYA

Current situation drastically expanded

Waste generation to be handled: 12,300 kg in total;Qabatiya 10,400 kg, NIS 6; 17,300 people in 2765 householdsA-Shuhada 600 kg, NIS 0; 1,530 people in 221 householdsBir Al Basha 450 kg, NIS 0; 1,150 people in 175 householdsMisiliya 800 kg; NIS 7; 1,980 people in 398 householdsAl Jarba 25 kg; 65 people in 11 households* The 12,300 kg will be collected from a large area of 50 square kilometers, about 3-10

kilometers south of Jenin Town, mountainous but at the western and eastern bordersplains, almost completely Area A; for Qabatiya and some nearby communities

* The 2765 households in Qabatiya (3570 in total) are combined with 262 shops, 11restaurants, 34 workshops, 67 factories, 3 petrol stations, 6 office, 13 clinics, 15schools/kindergarten, 63 farms and 4 mosques: in total 478 establishments (ratio 6.78,over the whole area it is 6.95); Most (50+11) of the 'factories' are mainly for stonecutting; most of the agricultural units are two olive mills and a number of greenhouses andagricultural nurseries.

* The almost 400 households in Misiliya grow olives as their main agricultural crop; forlogistics and shops they depend heavily on Qabatiya.

* Al Jarba, on the other hand, has 3.5 km2 but only 64 people in 11 households, no facilities,one spring used for agriculture;

* Establishments could contribute 22-25% to the total SWM scheme;

Current equipment: 1 compactor, 25 containers, 3 tractor-trail. ('93); 3x/week;

Needed additional: 2x tractor-trailers (replacement), 2x20 cubic metre roro containers± ramp; 75 small containers; TA

Scheme becomes: collection 3x/wk; roro 2x3xwk to landfill; room in scheme

e increased community participation;e appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Replacement:2006-2007: 2x compactor 8 cubic metre, 40 big + 120 containers, 2x20 cubic

metre container;2011: 2x TT+ 2x20 cubic metre container; 30 big + 60 small containers;2014: 2x compactor 12 cubic metre + 50 big and 100 small containers, lx

20 cubic metre container;2017: 30 big + 75 small containers; 2x 20 cubic metre container

Cluster 12:* Current scheme completely revised

Baseline* Waste to be handled from

A-Zababda 1550 kg, NIS 17, daily;Raba 1200 kg,Sir 250 kg, 676 people in 124 households (*)Tannin/Telfit/AlKufeir total 50 kg;

* A total of 3050 kg;* Large area, most in Area A; not so mountainous;* Establishments could contribute 20-22% to the total SWM fees;* A-Zababda: 662 households (3388 people, average family size only 5.1 versus 6 for the

Governorate); four churches and one mosque, they live in their 5.7 sq.km big urban liketown with 2 governmental schools, a library, three clinics and a relatively high density ofshops;

* Raba: 467 households (2669 people); strong community sense; agriculture is the mainsource of income; there are 2 schools; tractor and partial use of 3.5 cubic metre compactorshared with Silit A.D;

- Sir: 124 households (676 people); 5 shops, 6 coolstores,6 medical facilities, 3 educationalones, and I greenhouse: in total 21 establishments (ratio 5.9, over the whole area it is6.75);

* Current equipment: 12 cubic metre compactor, 50 containers, old tractor; primarycollection, daily and door to door: too expensive a system;

Proposed scheme• Secondary collection: half of the week in Al Zababda, half available for Raba and for other

clusters (support in Cluster 21 and in Tubas District); in other places the tractor 3x perweek;

* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: 30 containers; I tractor trailer (replacement); I roro

container + I ramp; TA;* Replacement:2006: lx compactor 3.5, 100 containers; 1 roro container;2011: lx TT; 140 containers; I roro container.2014: lx compactor 3.52017: 200 containers; 2 roro containers

Cluster 13:Current schemes combined and reorganisied

* Waste to be handled fromAl Judeida (Jadida) 2150 kg, NIS 5, 2x/wkSiris 2200 kg, NIS 5, 2x/wkMaythalun 3050 kg, NIS 7.5, 3x/wkSanur 1850 kg, NIS 15, 3x/wk

* In total a quantity of 9150 kg;* Large relatively flat area in Area A, there are some uphill collection places;* Family size (6.5) is above average.* Siris (4430 people in 684 households) is an area of 12.6 sq.km with 2 schools, mainly

living from cattle raising and dairy products;* Maythalun (6145 people in 977 households) is an area of 12.5 sq.km. living from olives,

cattle and factories;* Sanur (3745 people in 582 households) is an area of 12.9 sq.km. with two schools (one

UNRWA), 3 springs living from agriculture and cattle.* Current equipment: 3.5 cubic metre + 9 cubic metre compactors, 68 containers, 5x tractor

(3x'91;lx'94, lx'95);

Proposed scheme* Secondary and kerbside collection service by lx 9 cubic metre compactors and 4 Tractor-

Trailers,* Tailor made SWM fee per part of community based upon desired service leveUfrequency;* 2x roro container, one at Al Mahda one at old dump between Siris and Al Judeida; the

former 2x and the latter 4x per week to the landfill;* the currently additional 3.5 cubic metre compactor could be shared by clusters 16 and 21;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;i efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;- technical assistance and training;- monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Additional equipment: 50 containers; 4 trailers only (replacement); 2 roro container + I

ramp; TA;* Replacement:2007: lx compactor 12 cubic metre, 150 containers; 4x tractor trailer; 2x roro container in

efficient scheme (same equipment for growing population);2012: 200 containers, 3roro,2014: 2x compactors 8 cubic metre;2016: 4x TT;2018: 250 containers + 3 roro.

Cluster 14:* Current scheme upgraded

Baseline* Waste from Jaba alone 3800 kg;* NIS 10 on water bill (electricity is private company);* In 2002 there will be 7645 people in 1210 households in 2002; currently there are 120

shops, 4 restaurants, 16 workshops, 2 factories, 11 clinics, 9 schools/kindergarten, 12farms and 2 mosques: in total 176 establishments (ratio 6.88);

* The main source of income is from dairy products, cattle raising and export of clay;* There are two wheat mills, two olive mills, no stone cutting;* The town is affluent, yet receiving a minimum service of Ix (or 2x) weekly collection;* Organisation: Municipality, tel: 052 493 153; Mayor Khalil Kamel Salama;* Dump at train station square* Economic resources: labour abroad, agriculture, trade;* People accept fees and are committed to pay;* Current equipment: lx 3.5 cubic metre compactor, 58 containers for the paved roads

only; Ix Tractor-Trailer (1995) for the unpaved ones and remote areas;

Proposed scheme* Efficiency improvement leading to part-time use of equipment;* The roro container filled by the tractor-trailer will be collected from Al Mahda twice per

week;a increased community participation;

e appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;- full cost-recovery;- technical assistance and training;- monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additionally: 20 containers; I roro container but no ramp at Al Mahda (preferred

over tractor going to landfill); TA; increased frequency of collection.* Replacement:2006: Ix compactor 3.5, 100 containers; Ix tractor trailer (same

equipment for growing population), I roro container;2012: 125 containers, I roro container2014: lx compactor 8 cubic metre,2016: tractor-trail2018: 160 containers, 2 roro containers

Cluster 15:* Current scheme improved

Baseline* Waste from Al Fandaqumiya alone: 1250 kg,• SWM fee charged NIS 7,* 2x/wk collection;* 2953 people living in 486 households in 2002;* currently there are 87 shops, 4 restaurants, 4 workshops, I factories, 5 clinics, 5

schools/kindergarten, 11 farms and 1 mosque: in total 118 establishments (ratio 4.12);* establishments could cover one third of the total SWM fees;* Current equipment: lx tractor-trailer (1993);

Proposed scheme* Essentially same except for roro system situated at Al Mahda: 3x per week to the landfill;* landfill which means (with cluster 16) 6x per week;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing plans at fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: I trailer; I roro container and no ramp (preferred over

tractor going to landfill);* Replacement:2002: Ix tractor (same equipment for growing population);2006: 1 x roro container, I trailer;2012/13: 2x tractor-trailer + lx roro container.2017: 2x roro container

Cluster 16:* Current schemes combined and reorganisied

Baseline* Waste to be handled from:

Silat Adhahr (Ad Daher) 2750 kg; only NIS 5 for daily collection, (*)Al Attara 400 kg, NIS 5, 2x per week,Al Asasa 150 kg;

* A total of 3300 kg is collected;* mostly in Area B in not so mountainous area;* In Silit Adhahr, there are 818 households, 138 shops, 7 restaurants, 16 workshops, 5

factories, I petrol station, 2 offices, 8 clinics, 11 schools/kindergarten, 28 farms and 3mosques: in total 219 establishments (ratio 3.74, over the whole area it is 4);

* Current equipment: 1 skiplift, 17 containers; part-time compactor 9 cubic metre, 1handcart;

Proposed scheme* phase out the skiplift; use of part-time compactor and 1* tractor trailer; use of roro-container Cluster 15;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: 30 containers; 1 tractor trailer + ramp + no roro-container• Replacement:2006: lx compactor 3.5, 75 containers; Ox roro container2012: IxTT; 100 containers2014: lx compactor 3.5 cubic metre, 140 containers

Cluster 17:* Current scheme improved

Baseline* Waste to be handled from:

Ajja 2250 kg; NIS 6; 2x/wk; 686 households;Anza 700kg, NIS 5; 2x/wk, 337 hh;A-Zawiya 250 kg, NIS 0, 77 hh;ArRana (currently with Kafr Rai); 750 kg; NIS 1O; 2x/wk; 313 hh;

* Total 3,200 kg;* Large -not very mountainous- area with relatively good roads,* Area A mostly and Areas B/C;* Ajja: 686 households, 69 shops, 4 restaurants, 13 workshops, 4 factories, I petrol station, I

office, 6 clinics, 4 schools/kindergarten, 10 farms and 34 mosques: in total 115establishments (ratio 6.97); 11 sq.km living from agriculture;

* Anza: 337 households share 4.7 sq.km one mosque, two schools, numerous shops but nofactories; a local society might play a role in public awareness campaigns;

* Agriculture is the main source of income;* SWM fee is NIS 120 NIS yearly to be paid by every married man in the village;* Economic resources: trade, agriculture;3 People accept fees and are committed to pay the SWM fees;* The compactor truck reaches the families along the paved roads, not at the unpaved roads:

in this respect there are difficulties in waste collection;* Current equipment: lx 3.5 compactor truck; 55 containers;

Proposed scheme* 3x per week secondary collection; ramp directly to ZF* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;• full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Additional need: lxTT; 20 containers, neither 20 cubic metre container nor ramp but

directly to ZF instead;. Replacement:2006: lx compactor 3.5, 90 containers;2011: lxTT; 120 containers;2017: 150 containers

Cluster 18:* Current scheme slightly changed

Baseline* Waste to be handled from

Kafr Rai 3450 kg; NIS 10; 2x/wk; 6868 people in 1207 households;Fahma 950kg, NIS 10; 2x/wk; 2141 people in 366 households;Fahma Al Jadida 1 00kg; estimated 150 people in 25 households;Ar Rana 750 kg; NIS 10; 2x/wk; 1884 people in 313 households;

* total 5250 kg in area with relatively good roads nearby ZF landfill;• The 1207 households in Kafr Rai are combined with 116 shops, 10 restaurants, 14

workshops, I factory, I petrol station, 2 offices, 8 clinics, 8 schools, 4 kindergarten, 40agricultural specific entities like 6 olive mills and 3 mosques: in total 203 establishments(ratio 5.95 , over the whole area it is 6.8);

* Kafr Rai has urban like areas, but the municipal area covers also agricultural fields over 36square kilometers;

* ArRana 313 households, 8 shops, 0 restaurants, 3 workshops, I petrol stations, I office, 1clinics, 5 schools or kindergarten, 16 farms and I mosque: in total 36 establishments (ratio9.69, over the whole area it is 7.3); Village Council; tel. 062 434 010; Head of theCouncil: Salah Nazal; 30 containers, truck currently shared with Al-Jalama; dump atpublic land; local generator supplies the electricity, this bill could be used as a vehicle forSWM fees;

* Current equipment: lx 3.5 compactor truck; 48 containers; 1 tractor (1996)

Proposed scheme* 3x per week secondary collection by compactor truck, waste disposed of twice per day:

around 9:30 and 12:30-13:00;e tractor not in regional RoRo scheme, but brings waste to landfill directly instead (arrival

planned at noon, before construction of ZF it disposes at the Kafr Rai site;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;e full cost-recovery;i technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement• Needed additional equipment: 30 containers;. Replacement:2007: lx compactor 3.5 cubic metre, lx TT; 100 containers2013/14: lx compactor 3.5 cubic metre; 125 containers2017: lx TT;2019: 160 containers

Cluster 19:* Current scheme slightly changed

Baseline* Waste to be handled from Arraba alone (4300 kg;* SWM fee around NIS 11;* Currently, daily collection;* Urban-like town;* in 2002 there will be (2002) 8,774 people in 1493 households (average size 5.88) and

currently 124 shops, 8 restaurants, 49 workshops, 5 factories, 2 petrol stations, 3 offices, 6clinics, 13 schools and kindergarten, 45 farms and 5 mosques: total 260 establishments(ratio 6.74);

* huge municipal area covering 39.9 square kilometers;* lots of income sources: agriculture, construction, commerce, production; labourers abroad;* Municipality: Mayor: Mr. Anwar EzElDein; tel 062 502 929; some of the prime families:

Al Arda, EzElDein, Assaf, AlDagga, AbdelHadi, AlMugeir, Abu Surdaha, AbdelRahim* Dump in abandoned quarry near the village* Electricity from regional supplier; bill could be the vehicle for SWM fee* Current SWM fee in 3 categories (JD 20,24,28 yearly), depending the house size.* People committed to pay the SWM fee: strong, social and peer pressure to pay; will accept

via up to NIS 18-20 so room for cleansing.- Current equipment: lx 3.5 compactor truck for secondary collection; 67 (76) containers; I

tractor (1991) for kerbside collection; the compactor is efficient in this densely populatedtown; most of the roads are paved so the truck could reaches all the areas in the city,

* daily collection.

Proposed scheme* introduced cleansing;* Ix compactor for secondarycollection,* tractor phased out to be part of reserve scheme (some remote families with 100 kg will fall

under scheme of cluster 20);* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;• efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: 15 containers;* Replacement (since town characteristics and community participation: compactor in

combination with communal container is OK; since landfill vicinity: 3.5 cubic metre isOK):

2006: Ix compactor 3.5m, 100 containers2012: Ix compactor 3.5m, 125 containers2018: lx compactor 3.5m, 160 containers

Cluster 20:* New scheme in vicinity of ZF landfill

Baseline* Waste from

Mirka 550 kg; NIS 7; 2x per week;Arraba remote 100 kg,Ad Damayra 1 00kg,AlMansoura I 00kg,WadiDuoq 50kg;

* Total 900 kg in the area around the landfill.* In Mirka (4.4 sq.km), the 1366 people in 212 households mainly live from agriculture;

there is one school and one mosque.* Current equipment: none

Proposed scheme* Introduction of 2x weekly collection by tractor trailer directly disposing at landfill, in total

4 days busy and 2 days reserve for emergencies;* increased community participation;• appropriate routing plans for fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: I tractor-trailer; no roro container. Replacement:2011: Ix tractor-trailer (same equipment despite growing population)

Cluster 21:Current scheme improved and expanded

Baseline* Waste to be handled from

Ya'bad and Kfayrit: resp. 7600 kg and 950 kg; NIS and 7; 3x and 2x per week;* Urban like areas with good and unpaved roads;* Total 8,550 kg;* Current equipment: lx 3.5 compactor truck; 55 containers; I tractor (1972)

Proposed scheme* 1x compactor 3x/week secondary collection;* 2x tractor-trailers in remote/unpaved areas;* fastlgood connection to landfill;* support to Clusters 22/23 or support received from Cluster 13-16 or from pool when

required;* increased community participation;* appropriate routing plans for fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency improvements;

u full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: 2 tractor-trailers (one replacement), I roro container 6x

transported to landfill; I ramp; 50 containers; TA;* Replacement:2006: lx compactor 8 cubic metre, 140 containers; 1 roro containers;2011: 2x TT; 180 containers; 2 roro containers2013: lx compactor 8 cubic metre; Ix compactor 3.5 cubic metre2017: 225 containers; 3 roro containers2020: 2x compactor 8 cubic metre

Cluster 22:* New large scheme in western corner of Jenin District (road 596);

Baseline* Waste from:

Nazilat SS 250kg,Tura aG 400kg, NIS 10; 2x wkDhaher AM 75kg,Um Alrihan 150kg,A-Tarm 150kg,Tura aS 75kg,Khirbat SS 75 kg;

* total 1150kg from many small communities, currently not served (except Tura AG);* Current equipment: lx tractor by Tura Al Gharbiya 2x per week at NIS 10;

Proposed scheme* 2x weekly collection by tractor trailer; 2x to landfill;* introduced community participation;* appropriate routing plans at fixed and well-known hours;* efficiency introduction and capacity for set-up of various technical activities and

organisational pre-requisites;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: lx tractor-trailer; I roro container + no ramp (use of Yabad

ramp); TA;- Replacement:2006: lx roro container2012: 1. 5x tractor; I x roro container2018: 2x roro container

Cluster 23:* New large scheme in far western corner of Jenin District

Baseline* Waste from:

Barta'a Al Sharqiya 1400kg;Khirbet AAY 50kg;Khirbet aMaG/aMaS 25kg,Dhaher AA 150 kg,Qeiqis 50kg,Um Dar 200kg,Zabda and Ma't'aHajiM 300 kg;

* total 2150 kgin new area, scattered with people in remote areas and three small villagesaround the town of Barta'a;

* Barta'a A.S. (3165 people in 546 households) is the main residential area; citizens livefrom their farms: olives, cattle; there is no well.

* Current equipment: I tractor for Barta A.S. (paying NIS 15; 2x per week)

Introduced scheme- 2x weekly collection by tractor trailer; 6x to landfill;• increased community participation;- appropriate routing plans at fixed and well-known hours;i efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: 2x tractor-trailer (I as replacement); I roro container +

ramp; TA;* Replacement:2006: 2x roro container2011: 2.5x tractor; 2x roro container2016: 2x roro container

Cluster 24:* Slightly improved scheme for

Jenin Town 58 tonnesDahliat Saba alKheir 0.5 tonnesArab Zaweida 0.2 tonnes

* Expansion needs to take into account the new industrial area, university and urbanisation(see the scenarios pre-feasibility study Phase II);

* Total almost 60 tonnes per day, Thursday-Sunday more, Monday-Wednesday less.* Current equipment: 2 compactor trucks 12 cubic metre (1997), 1 skiplift (1997), 4 roro

trucks ('87, '91, 2x'94), 70 handcarts, 70x 7 cubic metre containers, 20x 4 cubic metrecontainers, 200 wheeled 1.1 cubic metre containers and 400 barrels;

Proposed scheme* Slightly improved as the municipality is already highly organised, with a solid waste

section and a 'Department of Foreign Affairs';* Increased levels of cleansing;* substantially increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;• efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* introduced schemes for card-board and paper collection (, compaction)and transportation

for recycling;- introduced schemes for the collection of relatively pure organic waste streams for the

compost pilot schemes at the landfill;* dealing with hazardous waste, start with waste separation of toxic waste and sharps (from

industrial areas to household level, including the large commercial sector in the shoppingcentres);

- mitigation of the economic results of closing the current dump for the scavengers andtraders in the informal sector picking ferrous and non-ferrous metals;

* pilot schemes for waste minimisation and seperation at source of various waste streams;* initiation of private sector involvement;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: I compactor trucks + 50 containers and 1 skiplift truck + 10

containers instead of 3 roro trucks; TA; I skiplift + 20 containers for industrial area; 50handcarts (half replacement);

* Replacement:2003: lx compactor + 50 containers;2004: 1 skiplift + 10 skiplift containers, 200 containers + 50 handcarts;2005: 1 compactor;2007: 1 compactor + 100 containers + 10 skiplift containers + 50 handcarts;2009: 2 compactors + 250 containers,2010: I skiplift + 15 skiplift containers;after: see finance schedules rolling stock and equipment

Cluster 25:* Slightly improved collection scheme

Baseline* Tubas Town (8750 kg)* Current equipment: 2 compactor trucks 12 cubic metre, 1 skiplift, 1 tractor trailer, 3

handcarts; 8x 4 cubic metre skiplift containers, 130 wheeled 1I.1 cubic metrecontainers;

All extensive details on the findings of the baseline surveys can be found in 9 of the 14reports of the pre-feasibility study (of the other 5: 4 deal with Hebron District solely, onehas the specifications of equipment);

Proposed scheme* Scheme remains as expensive as it is by providing mix of primary collection by high-tech

vehicles, if citizens pay; skiplift and tractor need to be phased out asap;* Trials of cooperation with nearby communities;* Substantially increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement- Needed additional equipment: 5 handearts; (replacement of 60 large by 60 new small

containers as exchange with other communities at no cost);- Replacement:2003: 100 small containers;2005: 2 compactor trucks 8 cubic metre; 100 containers;2011: 130 containers;2012: 1 compactor trucks 8 cubic metre, I compactor 12 cubic metre;2017: 175 containers2019: 2 compactor trucks 12 cubic metre

Cluster 26:* Tubas District 1: slightly expanded

Baseline* Waste arisings:

Aqqaba 2600 kg, NIS 10, 2x/week; 5231 people in 786 householdsIbziq 20kg; 51 people in 12 households;Salhab 25kg; 62 people in 9 households;Tayasir 550kg, 1359 people in 331 households;Al'Aqaba 60kg, 158 people in 15 households;Ath Taghra 100 kg, 223 in 39 households;

* Total 3400kg in 6 localities in a relatively not very mountainous area,* Entirely in Area A.* In Aqqaba: 786 households (1138 total in cluster), 63 shops, 2 restaurants, 18 workshops,

I petrol stations, 0 offices, 7 clinics, 8 schools/kindergarten, 53 farms and I mosque: intotal 153 establishments (ratio 6.14, over the whole area it is 6.45);

* Current equipment: I compactor, 73 containers;

Proposed scheme* improved, not full-time input of rolling stock;• increased community participation;• appropriate routing and placing plans;

efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: none* Replacement:2006: Ix compactor 3.5, 100 containers.2012: 125 containers2013: I x compactor 8 cubic metre2017: 160 containers2020: Ix compaxtor 12 cubic metre

Cluster 27:* Tubas District II: slightly expanded

Baseline* Waste arisings:

Tammun 4950 kg;Wadi El Farra 800kg;Kashda 15kg,Ras Al Fara 200kg;

* total 6000kg;* Area A mostly;* Current equipment: lx compactor 8 cubic metre, 69 containers;

Proposed scheme* increased community participation;* appropriate routing and placing plans;* efficiency improvements;* full cost-recovery;* technical assistance and training;* monitoring and periodic reporting;

Procurement* Needed additional equipment: 50 containers;. Replacement:2004/5: Ix compactor 8 cubic metre, 150 containers.2007: lx compactor 8 cubic metre;2010: lx compactor 8 cubic metre, 200 containers2014: lx compactor 8 cubic metre;2016: 250 containers;2017: lx 12 cubic metre compactor.

Annex 3.3

Site Management of ZaharatFinjan Sanitary Landfill

ANNEX3.3

SITE MANAGEMENT OFZAHARAT FINJANSANITARY LANDFILL

1.1 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHAND SAFETY

1.1.1 General

All site operations will be regulated by a Health and Safety Plan that specifies:

* full details of safety precautions and procedures to be adopted on site;

* all necessary traffic control measures, guards, screens and shrouds;

* an instruction manual detailing responses to all types of incident;

* appropriate levels of initial and on-going staff training and supervision;

* the requisite number of trained, qualified and responsible supervisors;

* reviews of adopted Health and Safety procedures and provisions;

* waste recording, analysis and monitoring procedures;

* measures and criteria to assess the acceptability of waste on reception;

* procedures to deal with, and dispose of, unsuitable wastes;

* minimum toilet, washing and rest facilities for staff use;

• appropriate protective clothing, equipment and safety aids to be worn;

* suitable system(s) of on-site communications;* adequate security measures to control and restrict access to the site;

* visitor control and access arrangements;• provision for regular landfill gas monitoring;

* provision for regular electrical testing;* disciplinary action for breaches of safety protocol; and

* procedures to exclude smoking, intoxicants and drugs on site.

As a matter of course, all site staff will be trained to recognise the symptoms of Weils

Disease (Leptospirosis). In addition, full-time site operatives will be provided with pre-

employment and periodic medical examinations in order to:

Pre-employment and periodic medical examinations should be conducted for all

personnel in order to:

* identify promptly the presence of communicable diseases; and

* monitor the overall health of site workers.

Specific surveillance programs will be instituted for personnel potentially exposed to

toxic substances.

1.1.2 Workplace Air Quality

Periodic monitoring of workplace air quality should be conducted for air contaminantsrelevant to employee tasks and the facility's operations. Ventilation, air contaminantcontrol equipment, protective respiratory equipment and air quality monitoring

equipment should be well maintained. Protective respiratory equipment shall be used

by employees when the exposure levels for welding fumes, solvents and other materialspresent in the workplace exceed local or intemationally accepted standards, or thresholdlimit values (TLVs) as annually published, for example, by the American Conference ofGovernmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) in "Threshold Limit Values for ChemicalSubstances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices."

1.1.3 Workplace Noise

Feasible administrative and engineering controls, including sound-insulated equipmentand control rooms should be employed to reduce the average noise level in normal workareas. Mobile plant and equipment should be well maintained to minimize noise levels.Personnel must use hearing protection when exposed to noise levels above 85 dBA for aminimum 15-minute exposure period.

1.1.4 Work In Confined Spaces

Prior to entry and occupancy, all confined spaces (e.g., tanks, sumps, vessels, sewers,excavations) must be tested for the presence of toxic, flammable and explosive gases orvapours and for the lack of oxygen. Adequate ventilation must be provided beforeentry and during occupancy of these spaces. Personnel must use air-suppliedrespirators when working in confined spaces that may become contaminated or deficientin oxygen during the period of occupancy. Observers/assistants must be stationedoutside of confined spaces to provide emergency assistance, if necessary, to personnelworking inside these areas.

1.1.5 Health - General

Sanitary facilities should be well equipped with supplies (e.g. protective creams) andemployees should be encouraged to wash frequently, particularly those exposed to dust,chemicals or pathogens. Personnel working in areas of high temperature and/or highhumidity should be allowed to take frequent breaks away from these areas.

1.1.6 Safety - General

All installations shall be designed and operated to protect the health and safety ofemployees and the community. The following are the minimum recommended safetyprocedures and practices for the workplace:

a) shield guards or guard railings to be installed at all belts, pulleys, gears and othermoving parts;

b) any elevated platforms and walkways, stairways and ramps to be equipped withhandrails, toe-boards and non-slip surfaces;

c) electrical equipment to be grounded, well insulated and conform with applicablecodes;

d) personnel to use special footwear, masks and clothing for work in areas with highdust levels or contaminated with potentially hazardous materials;

e) for work near high temperature materials, employees to be provided with non-slipfootwear, gloves, safety glasses, helmets, face protection, leggings and othernecessary personnel protective equipment;

f) eye protection to be worn by personnel when in areas where there is a risk of flyingchips or sparks, or where intense light is generated;

g) personnel to wear protective clothing and goggles when in areas where corrosive,reactive, ignitable or toxic materials are stored or processed;

h) emergency eyewash and showers to be installed adjacent to areas containingcorrosive materials;

i) a safety programme to be established for construction and maintenance work; and

j) a fire prevention and fire safety programme to be implemented, to include regulardrills.

1.1.7 Drinking Water

To be in conformity with the drinking water standards that are published by the WorldHealth Organization in "Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, Health Criteria and theSupporting Information".

1.1.8 Training

Employees should be trained on the hazards, precautions and procedures for the safestorage, handling and use of all potentially harmful materials relevant to eachemployee's task and work area. Training should incorporate information from theMaterial Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) for potentially harmful materials which can beobtained from the suppliers of the chemicals being used.

Personnel should be trained in environmental, health and safety matters includingaccident prevention, safe lifting practices, the use of MSDSs, safe chemical handlingpractices and proper control and maintenance of equipment and facilities

1.1.9 Occupational Health and Safety Monitoring

Records of job related accidents and illnesses (incidents) shall be maintained. Therecords shall include all incidents resulting in an incapacity to work for at least one fullworkday beyond the day on which the accident or illness occurred. Records should alsoinclude the total number of days of absence from work as the result of an incident.

1.2 EMfERGENCY RESPONSE

In conformity with the general principles outlined above, ilt is envisaged that thefollowing procedures and measures will be adopted as part of the Operations Plan forZaharat Finjan Sanitary Landfill:

* regular training sessions, practices and drills for all site staff to simulate a range ofpotential accidents and fires;

* regular liaison, including training sessions, with local emergency servicesdepartments to ensure minimal delays in response, familiarity with site conditionsand access, and the use of appropriate techniques and equipment;

* designation of key staff as trained and responsible first-aiders;

* provision of on-site of emergency medical kits with adequate stocks of first aidmaterials;

* provision on site of emergency medical equipment, e.g. breathing apparatus,stretchers, harnesses, and familiarisation of key staff in their use;

* provision of first-aid kits on all site vehicles, maintained to an agreed standard andwith items replaced as used;

* training of all staff in the safe use of fire extinguishers and fire blankets inconjunction with the local Fire Service Department;

- suspension of all site activities in the immediate vicinity of a fatality on site as aresult specifically of site operations. Any necessary changes in working practiceswould be implemented in order to prevent a similar re-occurrence; and

• the recording of all accidents, injuries and any fatalities, to be notified to theappropriate authorities as required by law.

A brief outline of the proposed staff responsibilities for Emergency Response should bedocumented, indicating key management roles, the chain of command, communicationrequirements (for example, emergency contact telephone numbers - day, night and off-duty, home and mobile number for responsible site staff, contact numbers for off-siteservices - fire, police, ambulance, hospitals, etc.) and the relationship with outsideservices, particularly fire-fighting and medical facilities.

The Site Operator will prepare an Emergency Response Plan that:

* identifies all potential risks and hazards arising from handling and disposing ofmixed MSW that, potentially, contains also industrial and hazardous wastes;

* specific measures for inspecting, testing and verifying waste loads and wastecomposition;

* specific procedures for dealing with hazardous wastes should these be identified onsite;

* specific procedures for dealing with all other incidents that may arise and whichthreaten the health, safety and security of site staff, adjacent communities and theenvironment at large; and

• identifies the types of training measures and practices to be undertaken to familiarisesite staff and outside emergency services with all aspects of site operations - typesof training, frequency, etc.

A copy of the approved and agreed Emergency Response Plan should be lodged with allrelevant emergency services, the licensing and regulatory authorities and otherappropriate civic institutions.

1.3 SITE RECORDS AND RECORD KEEPING

The Site Operator will develop summary forms and documentation to encompass alltypes of records to be maintained at the project site with respect to the receipt, handlingand disposal of wastes. The Site Operator will identify the types of records to be kept,who is responsible for preparing and checking the record, at what frequency the recordis generated, to whom it should be submitted and where on site the record (or copythereof) is stored (for reference).

Records should be maintained on site of the following aspects of site operation:

* customer service;* municipal, industrial and special waste inputs (by category);• waste analytical results;• volumes and tonnages of waste disposed to landfill;• unacceptable wastes and chain of command/responsibility;• locations where industrial and special wastes disposed;* specific location of special and difficult wastes;* construction/as built records;* quality assurance and quality assurance (construction and deposition);* waste inspections;• environrmental audits and inspections;* environrmental monitoring results and analyses;• wastewater treatment influent - volume and quality;* treated wastewater effluent - volume and quality;* topographic surveys of the deposition area and completed cells;* incidents and accidents;* mobile and fixed plant maintenance;* infrastructure maintenance;. staff records;* visitor records; and* health screening.

Annex 4.1

Public Consultation andDisclosure Plan (PCDP)

ANNEX 4.1

PUBLIC CONSULTATIONAND DISCLOSURE PLAN (PCDP)

INTRODUCTION

This plan details the forthcoming public consultation and information disclosureexercise that the Ministry of Environmental Affairs (MEnA) and ERM will undertakeas part of the EA process. The scoping and planning of the public consultation anddisclosure exercise for the site is presented in this document. The plan outlines thefollowing activities to be carried out:

* verification of key stakeholders;* notifying stakeholders about the project and the EA activities through public notices

and other means;* preparation of an 'information package' for key stakeholder representatives and

other interested parties based on the conceptual design and feasibility reports;* consultations with key stakeholders in both project areas including public meetings

for the local communities;* incorporating consultation findings into the EA report;* making publicly available the EA report (with associated announcements); and* local dissemination of non-technical summaries of the EA report.

OBJECTI VES OFPUBLiC CONSULTATION AND DIScLOSURE

The main objectives of public consultation and disclosure are to inform identifiedstakeholders and other interested parties of proposed project components, presentstakeholders with the opportunity to voice both their positive opinions and concerns,and to enable these issues to be addressed in the EA and incorporated into the projectdesign. The overall goal of the consultation process is to:

* build public confidence in the project design and implementation through acomprehensive communication and participation programme.

The specific objectives of the public consultations in this project are to:

* raise awareness of the project with key stakeholders;* provide stakeholders with the opportunity to influence the development of project

components;* highlight public awareness needs for project implementation; and* provide systems recommendations for future public liaison and public complaints

during project implementation and operation.

The key elements of the public consultation process will include co-ordination of the EAwith government agencies, the academic and scientific community, local NGOs andaffected groups. This will build on previously completed consultation undertakenduring the Pre-Feasibility stage and will be achieved through interviews and meetingswith stakeholders. Main findings and recommendations will be presented to the publicat the stage of the Draft EA Report in a meeting and in written information.

PRiOR To THE EA

Consultation with many stakeholders has already taken place during the Pre-feasibilityprogramme. Consultations were carried out between April 1998 and June 1999targeting communities in the vicinity of the proposed Zaharat Finjan landfill site andcitizens from the Jenin District during the site selection and preliminary EA process.The following activities have taken place:

* consultations with key decision makers at all governmental levels;• discussions with citizens in key population centres with regard to existing waste

management issues and willingness to pay for improved services;* discussions with key NGOs;* direct public consultations with the communities potentially affected by the proposed

landfill development in order to:* raise awareness the community about the proposed

facilities and the decision making timeframe;* inform stakeholders on facility use, the timescale of

use, and the implications of the development;* understand and document any stakeholders concerns;* work towards public support for the proposed

developments.

Community level consultation was held on several occasions and went on to discuss:

- potential impacts and proposed mitigation measures to be employed as part of sitedevelopment;

- local community perspectives on likely mitigation measures;e impacts from closure of the existing sites; and• land ownership, land-use and temporary loss of agricultural productivity.

Documentary evidence of these consultation activities will be included within the EAreport.

SCOPING

The scope of the EA was discussed and developed with inputs from all parties duringthe Pre-feasibility stage and subsequently agreed. During the project mobilisation ofthis Conceptual Design, Feasibility Study and EA programme in January 2000 theConsultants verified the scope of issues to be addressed and began co-ordinating the EAprogramme with government agencies, the academic and scientific community, localNGOs and affected groups. Extensive discussions and consultations were held withrelevant government officials as well as with the client, local authorities, othergovernmental organisations and other sources.

Public Consultation and Disclosure in the EA process will meet the requirements ofrelevant Palestinian environmental and other regulatory agencies, and those generallyaccepted internationally (such as the EC Directive 85/337, the World Bank OperationalPolicy (OP) / Bank Procedures (BP) / Good Practices (GP) 4.01, and the EA UpdateNo. 26, published in May 1999).

2

MVETHODOLOGY

The Public Consultation and Disclosure process will be developed in two stages:

Stage 1: During the Conceptual Design, Feasibility Study and Draft EnvironmentalAssessment

The project team and MEnA will finalise stakeholder target groups and publicconsultations and will work together to implement the programme. Methodologies andfindings to be addressed in the Draft EA.

Stage 2: Following completion of the Draft Environmental Assessment

The main findings and recommendations of the Draft EA will be presented in a suitableformat to the both the public and an Expert Committee for comments and feedback.Comments and feedback will be reported to MEnA and the Ministry of LocalGovernment (MoLG) to be addressed with support of the Consultants and will be fedinto the final design criteria, as appropriate.

Documentary evidence of these consultation and disclosure activities as well, will beincluded within the EA report.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

The PCDP has identified several core activities for Stage 1:

* stakeholder analysis was carried out as part of the Pre-feasibility study and keystakeholders were represented at the public consultations held during thisprogramme. This analysis will be reviewed and amended as appropriate. Theinterests of key stakeholders in relation to the project will be verified and anassessment of their capacity to participate in on-going consultations will beundertaken.

* preparation of an 'information package' in an accessible format for all keystakeholder representatives and other interested parties will be undertaken based onthe conceptual design and feasibility reports.

* consultation meetings will be held with pre-determined audiences explaining andverifying previous consultations outcomes as appropriate:

* Project elements;Project design components (such as landfill construction,closure of current uncontrolled disposal sites, improvedcollection services etc);the need and benefits of improvement to waste managementthroughout the West Bank and specifically the need forimproved waste collection and the need for sanitarylandfilling for the community as a whole;

3

* problems with existing waste collection and disposalpractices;

* key differences between a well operated sanitary landfill andexisting dump sites in the West Bank;

* the requirements for good landfill operation and thus lowimpact to the community;

* potential key positive and negative impacts of the landfill onthe immediate community and the need for key decisionmakers to ensure good landfill operations are maintained;

* the desires of the local community with respect to mitigatingpotential negative impacts;

* commitment of the government to respect fair compensatorymeasures for those whose land is required for proposedlandfill development';

* waste collection system needs and recommendedimprovements;

* the positive impacts to the community from improvedcollection and disposal;

* the waste transfer and safe disposal management framework;* the institutional framework for SWM and monitoring and

regulation responsibilities; andthe financial cost of the improved service and the proposedmethod of cost recovery.

* incorporation of public consultation findings into the Draft EA, specifically in theEnvironrmental Management Plan; and

* preparation of Draft EA disclosure activities to stakeholders.

DR4FT EA REPORTDISCLOSURE ACTIVITIES

For Stage 2 the following activities have been identified:

Following submission of the draft EA report to the Palestinian Authorities and prior tofinalising the EA report, key findings of the report will be made public for a period of60 working days. Disclosure of information will, at a minimum, meet the standardsrequired by Palestinian Authorities and the World Bank.

MEnA with support from ERM will make the key findings accessible (throughtranslations and non-technical summaries) and notices will be placed in localnewspapers stating where and when the information may be viewed.

The Consultant will support the development of responses to each received commentand, if necessary, a final round of public consultation will be conducted. The need forsuch final consultation is dependant on the response to the Draft EA, but, ifimplemented, would likely take the form of a large public hearing. It is expected thatthis would provide an open forum in which any residual issues could be discussed to

(I)There are no settlersonthe proposed project sites andno resettlemert Action Plan isrequired. Land owners and users must receive faircompensation when their land is acquired fur project development.

4

ensure all concerns are adequately addressed. In addition, further discussion with anExpert Committee or Scientific Advisory Panel may be required.

All meetings, together with feedback from the local consultations will be documentedand contained in the EA report. Issues identified throughout the public consultationperiod will be addressed in detail in relevant sections of the EA reports.

ONGOING CONSULTATION

A continuing consultation process will be required through the construction andoperation of project components, particularly with regard to the proposed landfill sites.

Project recommendations to be specified in the EA will ensure appropriateenvironmental management and monitoring practices are fulfilled. Stakeholders willneed to be informed about the scheduling of potentially disruptive events and will beinformed of environmental monitoring data disclosure. Appointment of a communityliaison officer who will have a continuous 'open-door' policy, thereby allowing localresidents to voice concerns and a procedure for addressing these concerns as they arise,will be considered.

PROPOSED CONSULTA TIONAND DISCLOSURE SCHEDULE

The consultation and disclosure activities are planned for the period 27 March toapproximately 10 July 2000. The provisional schedule is as shown (Box 1). A MEnArepresentative will be present during most public consultation activities and will be adesignated contact point for EA related comments or inquiries.

Box 1: Proposed Consultation and Disclosure Plan

March 2000Finalise stakeholder analysis review.

First week April 2000Preparation of an 'information package'.

Second week April 2000Consultation meetings with pre-determined audiences.

Third week April 2000Incorporation of public consultation findings into Draft EA Report

Fourth week April 2000Preparation of Draft EA disclosure activities

May and June 2000Review of Draft EA Report by Palestinian Authorities, World Bank and EIB.Presentation of main findings and recommendations of the Draft EA in a suitableformat to the public and an Expert Committee for comments and feedback.Announcement of final round of public consultations.

5

July 2000 If necessary, public hearings at the site.

CONSULTATION OUTPUTS

Among the key issues related to the consultation and disclosure activities that will beaddressed in the EA report are:

* methodologies used to inform and involve the public in the EA process;* analysis of the data and information gathered;* discussion of strategic consultation and disclosure issues;* documentation of public meetings and interviews, including dates, names, topics of

discussion, and important outcomes* recommendations on how the project might address or mitigate issues raised during

public consultations; and* recommendations for ongoing public consultations.

A Table summarising key issues raised in the consultations will also be included. TheTable will be structured as follows:

Table A Summnary of Consultations Findings

Person(s) Organisation Key Issue Raised. How addressed in EAname and EMP

6

Annex 4.2

Public Consultation QuestioningGuide Level 1

PUBLIC CONSULTATIONQUESTIONING GUIDE LEVEL I

Municipality:Neighbourhood:# of people in household:Male or Female:

* Briefly describe present waste collection system:(e.g.: no regular collectionDoor-to-Door collectionCommunal containerCurbside collection)

* Frequency of collection:

* Who collects the waste from the curbside, door or container?

* How do you rate the waste collection service?Very satisfiedReasonably satisfiedNot satisfied at allDon't know

* What is the main reason?

. What kind of improvement of waste collection services would you like to have in your neighbourhood?(D-t-D, curbside, communal, etc.) ?

* Would you be willing to pay a higher fee for such an improvement ?

* What is the minimum level of SWM services you are willing to accept (frequency, D-t-D,communal container, street sweeping)

* Do you know where the collected waste is taken for ultimate disposal when it leaves your neighbourhood?

. Are you concerned about whether the ultimate disposal is environmentally safe and acceptable?

* Would you be willing to pay a higher fee for disposal of waste when you know that it will beenvironmentally safe and acceptable ?

* When meetings will be held to discuss improvements of waste collection and disposal in your town,would you like to participate ?

• Is there anything else you would consider to do to improve waste collection and disposal in your town ?

Annex 4.3

Public Consultation QuestioningGuide Level 2

PUBLIC CONSULTATIONQUESTIONTVG GUIDE LEVEL 2

Municipality:Neighbourhood:Male / Female:# persons in household:

* Briefly describe present waste collection system

* Frequency of collection and by whom?

* How much do you pay presently for SWM services ?

* How do you rate the waste collection service and why?

* What kind of improvement of waste collection services would you like to have in yourneighbourhood ?

* Improvement of waste collection involves different levels of involvement and costs from service recipiesuch as you. The service options are described as follows:

Target Levels of Environmental and Health Improvement for Collection of Solid Waste in UrbanAreas

1 Minimum Level* Daily collection of communal containers every 150 meters* Each household and establishment is expected to carry its container or bag of refuse to the

container and empty it in the container.. Crash cleaning when urgent* No collection of construction debris* Waste disposal at controlled landfill site

Costs for disposal 4 NIS per household; collection 9 NIS ; total NIS 13/household/month = JD 2.6.

2. Mlinimum + level

. Daily collection of communal containers every 100 meters* Each household and establishment is expected to carry its container or bag of refuse to the

container and empty it in the container.* Some street sweeping* Crash cleaning when necessary* No collection of construction debris* Waste disposal at controlled landfill site

Costs for disposal 4 NIS per household; collection 13 NIS; total NIS 17/householdlmonth= JD 3.4.

3. Minimum level ++

* More than once per day collection of communal containers every 100 meters* Each household is expected to carry its container or bag of refuse to the container and empty it in the

container.* Some establishments will have door-to-door collection* Street sweeping* Regular crash cleaning* Collection of construction debris* Waste disposal at controlled landfill siteCosts for disposal 4 NIS per household; collection NIS 17; total NIS 21/household/month = JD 4.2

4. Medium Level* More than once per day collection of communal containers every 100 meters* Door-to-door collection* Street sweeping* Regular crash cleaning* Collection of construction debris* Waste disposal at controlled landfill

Costs for disposal 4 NIS per household; collection 21 NIS; total NIS 25/household/month = JD 5

5. Amenity level* More than once per day collection of communal containers every 80 meters* Door-to-door collection* Daily street sweeping* Regular crash cleaning* Collection of construction debris* Public Awareness* Waste disposal at controlled landfill

Costs for disposal 4 NIS per household; collection 27 NIS; total NIS 31/household/month = JD 6.2

6. Sophisticated level

* More than once per day collection of communal containers every 100 meters* Door-to-door collection by motorised vehicles* Daily street sweeping* Regular crash cleaning* Collection of construction debris* Public Awareness* Waste disposal at controlled landfill

Costs for disposal 4 NIS per household; collection NIS 33; total 37/household/month = JD 7.4.

* Which of the service options just described do you prefer?

* Is there for you any maximum distance you are prepared to walk to the container ?

* Do vou have any idea how you would like the SWM fees to be collected ?(e.g. per month, per year, SWM fee, with water bill, occupancy tax, as a tax on property, with theelectricity bill, licenses)

* How do you think the municipality should handle the problem of illegal dumping and littering ?

* Do you know where the collected waste is taken for ultimate disposal when it leaves your neighbourhood

* Are you concerned about whether the ultimate disposal is environmentally safe and acceptable ?

* Would you be willing to pay a higher fee for disposal of waste when you know that it will beenvironmentally safe and acceptable ?

* When meetings will be held to discuss improvements of waste collection and disposal in your town,would you like to participate ?

* Is there anything else you would consider to do to improve waste collection and disposal in your town

* Do you have any further questions or remarks ?

Annex 4.4

Participants in the ZF Site Visit3 December 1998

ANNEX 4.4

PARTICIPANTS IN 3 DECEMBER ZAHARA T FINJAN SITE VISIT

1. Dr. Yusef Sadek2. Adnan Aziz Atari3. Yaseen Sliman Abu El Wafat4. Hafez El 'Aarda5. Marwan AzizAtari6. Kanthan Shankar7. Husam Abu Dagga8. Hani Shawahne9. Dr. Hafez Shaheen10. Hasan Ahmed Abdel Jawad11. Husein El Fayz12. Mohamed El Haj Said Atari13. Mohamed Said El Hmaidi14. Ramez El Titi15. Liesbeth Zonneveld

Annex 4.5

Participants in NGO Workshopin Jenin 23 April 2000

ANNEX 4.5

PAR TICIPANTS IN NGO WORKSHOP IN JENIN 23 APRIL 2000

The Jenin Union of Women's Committees for Social Work hosted a workshop todiscuss the Conceptual Design of the Zaharat Finjan landfill site and overall frameworkof the SWM project and get NGO feedback. Fourteen NGOs were invited, howevereight people representing six NGOs and one Ministry, attended the meeting as thefollowing table shows:

Name Organisation Contact numbers

Ali Mahmoud Khader Environmental Health Department - Tel: 06-2503298Ministry of Health Fax: 06-2503377

Mahed Naser Agricuitural Work Union/Catholic Tel: 06- 2433492Relief Services- Rural DevelopmentProject

Yazeed 'Awayseh Palestinian Hydrology Group/ Tel: 06- 2433492Catholic Relief Services- RuralDevelopment project

Myassar 'Assaf SCF- Jenin Villages Project- Health Tel: 09-2383764Education

Mu'es Shalbak SCF- Nablus- Health Projects Tel: 09-2383764Coordinator

Dalal Abu Bakr Women's Committee for Social work

Sami Dawood PHG- Hydrogeologist Telfax:09-2374057

Subheyyeh Ghanem Handicapped Rehabilitation Program-Jenin

Annex 4.6

Interviews with Waste Pickers atthe Present Jenin Dump Site,April 2000

ANNEX 4.6

INTERVIEWS WITH WASTE PICKERS AT PRESENT JENIN DUMP SITE

During four days in April 2000, the present dump site in Jenin was visited to determineand verify the number of waste pickers and their characteristics.

Loss of Employment at Existing Sites

Assessment of the employment loss from the closure of existing dump sites showed thatthere are four adult waste pickers on the existing Jenin dump site, in addition to a smallgroup of children. Waste scavengers at the Jenin dump site were interviewed and thefollowing profile was determined:

* professional metal scrap (iron, copper, and aluminium) collectors and dealers;* four male adults;* 52, 53, 58 and 75 years old;* working at the site since 1990, 1993, 1995, and 1998;* all year long, 6-7 days per week;* two persons report 80 % of their income is from the Jenin dump site metal

collection; two persons report 10-20 %;* income reported by waste pickers is 180 NIS per tonne of iron, 4500 NIS per tonne

of copper, and 3,000 NIS per tonne of aluminium; ande reported monthly income is between US$ 200 to US$ 2,000; and

e children at the site work irregularly and sell metals to the four above mentioned maincollectors/dealers.

Socio-Economic Impacts

The proposals to develop a sanitary landfill prohibit scavenging activities at the projectsite and will thereby reduce the waste scavengers ability to derive this source of incomeonce the dump site is closed.

Waste pickers at the Jenin dump site will require compensation with respect to partialloss of livelihood. It is considered that the most appropriate compensation includes:

* consideration for low-skilled employment at the proposed ZF landfill;* consideration for employment in other low skilled waste sector positions; and* re-training for alternative employment.

It is the responsibility of the Jenin Municipality to ensure that project implementationdoes not adversely affect the livelihoods of the waste scavengers. Responsibility forensuring that this is enforced should lie with the MoLG . This is further presented inSection 8.

Improved operations at the dump site in the interim period, also recommended as part ofthis waste management improvement programme, should limit scavenger access to thetipping face at the dump site and improve basic health and safety. Such proposals willnot exclude waste scavengers, but rather control their movement on the dump. Suchproposals may remove their partial source of income.

Annex 4.7

Summary of Public ConsultationFindings

ANNEX 4.7

SUMMARY OFPUBLIC CONSULTATIONVS FINDINGS

PHASE I OF THE PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY(APRIL-MAY1998) DURINGDEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAFT MASTERPLAN

Purpose of the Public Consultation/Participation process was to allow the communitiesconcerned to understand the proposals and to raise local concerns. Secondly toestablish detailed social information to be used to help determine the nature of theSWM system.

In order to obtain this information a workshop was held in each city at the meetingroom of the municipality or, in the case of Hebron, at the PEnA office, to which localstakeholders were invited. Invitations were extended by the municipality itself, onrecommendation of the Consultants, municipality and PEnA staff. The workshops wereguided by native Arabic speaking project team members, who also reported on theproceedings. After the workshop, a field visit was made to the main dumping area andthe city was toured. Typically, project team members, in co-operation with workshopparticipants, selected different city areas to conduct guided interviews using questioningguide level 1 or 2. The city areas were selected based on criteria such as populationdensity, apparent socio-economic status and level of cleanliness. Shopkeepers andresidents were asked whether they wanted to spend some time with the team to discussthe SWM situation in their town. Nobody refused to talk to the team. The interviewtook place in the form of a conversation rather than an interview. Answers were writtendown during the conversation.

During the meetings and discussions on the technical and managerial level a fairlyaccurate picture about the current SWM situation emerged. Municipal staff themselvesgave an assessment of the SWM services in their city, of the rating of municipal SWMskills and of the rate of satisfaction of the public about municipal SWM services. ThePublic Consultation exercises showed that the views of municipalities and residents insome cases contradicted each other, whilst in other cases they complemented each other.Residents do not always have all knowledge necessary to give an informed opinionabout SWM services; similarly municipal staff do not always take into considerationthe wishes and frustrations of the residents.

Two questioning guides were used, a level 1 questioning guide for the four cities notincluded in the Cost Analysis exercise, and a level 2 questioning guide for the two citiesfor which detailed costs analyses were included. The information gathered is includedin the following analyses of the SWM situation for the six cities.

2. PUBLIC CONVSULTA TIONS IN PHASE II OF THE PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY (JUNVE-AUGUST1998) W7TH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE PROPOSED L4NDFILL

Public consultations were carried out in Phase I and were referred to within the Phase Ioutput, the Draft MasterPlan. Throughout the course of the study on-goingconsultation and discussions between the relevant municipalities, PEnA, ERM, NGOs,World Bank and other relevant parties (such as the Israeli Director of EnvironmentalAffairs) have been carried out.

Once the specific site for the preferred landfill development was determined, and as partof the environmental analysis and assessment programme, direct public consultationswere held with the local community potentially affected by the landfill development.

Public consultation is a tool for managing two-way communication between a projectand the public to improve decision making and to build understandings throughinvolving individuals, groups and organisations. In this project, stakeholders are thoseaffected by the proposed sanitary landfill site selected and the overall SWM project,and those that have the ability to influence, positively or negatively, the course andoutcome of the project.

As part of this first stage of environmental analysis and assessment, interviews anddiscussions were held with the communities considered to be directly affected by the sitedevelopment. These communities are listed below in Table A

Table A Communities within a 2km radius of the Proposed Zaharat Finjan Landfill Site

Community Location Population

Fahme 2 km North-West 1.500

Fahme camp 2 km North-North- 420 Palestinians and anEast unknown number of Israeli

militaries

' Aja 2 km South. 3,100

Family house of Abdel El Mina'im Abu El Wafat 800 meters East 20(200 meters from

Jenin-Nablus

asphalt road)

Family house 800 meters East 20

(200 meters from

Jenin-Nablusasphalt road)

Bedouin camp of 'Shawaheen' brothers 500 meters East 25-30

(500 meters fromJenin-Nablusasphalt road)

Walid El 'Aarda house 450 meters East 2-3

(650 meters fromJenin-Nablus

asphalt road)

Turkey farm 400 meters West- I care taker

North-West (1600meters fromFahme)

In the context of this project, the goals of the local stakeholder consultations were toinitiate the following:

* raising awareness of and informing the community about the proposed developmentand the decision making timeframe;

* informing stakeholders of the basis of the site use, the timescale of use, and theimplications of the development;

* understanding and documenting any concerns stakeholders have about the sites andreceiving their inputs on project relevant issues; and

* working towards public support for, and agreement on, the development of the site.

In order to ensure that the identified communities within 2km of the site were given the

opportunity to express their views, discussions were held with members of each of the

residences/farms and with those households that overlooked the site from the village of

Fahme. A summary of the comments and findings of the consultations is provided asAnnex A. Recommendations for how to develop and work with the community tominimise the impacts of the site are provided in Section 5.

General Remarks

The expectations of the residents in the vicinity of the site is that full sanitary landfillingpractises will not be instigated and waste burning, exposed waste and poor site

operation will be prevalent. These form the basis of their objections to the site.

As such, site construction, operation and control must be undertaken to highperformance targets and must be subject to adequate monitoring and control. Inaddition, there is a further requirement to develop the relationship with the localcommunity, in order to further discuss the advantages and mitigation measures included

with the development of sanitary landfilling, and to work with them to determine what

can be done on a local scale to mitigate against the negative impacts of thedevelopment. Further, it is necessary during the detailed design and implementation toassist the residents to develop a point of contact with the authority responsible for solidwaste and management of the landfill development and operation.

3. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS CONTINUED THROUGH PHASE II OF THE PRE-FEASIBnILTY

STUDY (NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 1998) DURING THE SECOND STAGE OF

ENVIRONMENTAL ANAL YSIS

Principal Issues

The principal concerns raised during the consultation meeting and site visit were:

* the potential odour, dust and noise impacts from site activities;

* compensation measures to be taken by the Palestinian Authority for temporary lossof land in productive use; and

* reduction in local property values.

These issues were highlighted by three persons, one person living 800m from theproposed landfill site and two brothers who own part of the land on which th. proposedlandfill is to be built. These potential negative impacts were first highlighted in theenvironmental analysis reports.

Full discussion of the mitigatory measures that could be employed to minimise suchimpacts was held at the site with the concerned parties.

Potential Odour, Dust and Noise Impacts from Site Activities

It was explained to the stakeholders that the potential impacts from noise, dust and

odour at the site would be minimised through the site design and operational practice

which should be strictly enforced. It was clarified that it will be the responsibility of the

operator to monitor routinely any negative impacts and adjust operational practices

and/or take appropriate measures to control them, as appropriate. The operational

procedures used to minimise such impacts are discussed in the Section 7,

Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan.

Compensation Measures to be Taken by the Palestinian Authority for Temporary

Loss of Land in Productive Use

Following the Wye River Agreement, in November 1998, the proposed landfill area and

adjacent lands were transferred from Area B to Area A and are, therefore, under the

direct control of the Palestinian Authority. The first 500 meters of the site access road,

from the main Jenin-Nablus highway, are in Area C. The change of administrative

arrangements are not likely have an effect on the proposed development of the site, as

far as Israeli approval is concerned. The Zaharat Finjan site was approved by the

Israeli Authorities in 1995.

The procedures currently in use by the Palestinian Authority should be applied to

ensure adequate compensation for the current landowners loss of productivity of the

land. These procedures have been applied recently in other large infrastructure projects

including the development of the Nablus Industrial Estate project.

The Consultants were informed by PEnA in November 1998 that the following steps

will be taken by the Palestinian Authority to ensure that the land is available and all

permits in place for development of a sanitary landfill at Zaharat Finjan. These

procedures were valid up to the date of publishing this report and include the definition

of compensatory measures for landowners. The procedures are described below:

1. Preparation of a map of the land of the proposed landfill footprint and the immediate

adjacent lands including the exact parcel numbers, boundaries and land-owners.

The Jenin Municipality committed themselves to facilitate the preparation of the

necessary map;2. The proposed Project has to be reviewed by the Higher Planning Council (HPC);

3. The HPC appoints a comnmittee to assess measures to be taken to compensate land-

owners. This Assessment Conmnittee is headed by the Ministry of Finance, and

further consists of representatives from the Ministry of Local Government, relevant

Municipalities, Ministry of Agriculture and the Department of Survey of theMinistry of Housing;

4. After having settled all land-ownership issues involved, the Project will b(.reviewed

in the Joint Environmental Experts Co-ordination and Co-operation Committeeconsisting of Israeli and Palestinian Authorities Environmental Experts.

These procedures were explained to stakeholders concerned.

Reduction in Local Property Values

Reduction of property values can be minimised by professional sanitary landfill

operations and public relations work but it is not possible to totally alleviate the risk of

reduced property values. This was explained to interested stakeholders and it wasreiterated that PEnA were committed to ensuring high operational and environmentalstandards which would limit any adverse impact.

Overall Assessment of Stakeholders Opinions

All stakeholders except two brothers who own part of the proposed site and one personliving in the vicinity of the site, support the development of the proposed landfill.

The two brothers, supported by the Mayor of their village 'Arrabe, seek compensationfor temporary loss of land in productive use and reduction of local property values.PEnA has taken all responsibilities to resolve these issues and further meetings areplanned to discuss and sort out grievances.

Overall assessment is that the development is acceptable assuming that goodenvironmental practices are in place and strictly enforced. The grievances of somestakeholders will be resolved and are not considered to be a project-stopper.

Annex 5.1

Geological Borehole Log

Log of Borehole No. 1 E; EProject No: S 00 002 Borehole No.: 1 Hole Size: 4''

Project: Land Fill Project Northing: 198,615.76 Engineer: IM.H

Client: Saqqa & Khudari Contracting Co. Easting: 169,730.61 Datum: National

Location: Jenin Ground Water Depth: N.E Elevation: 314.3

Drill Method: Rotary Air Flush Drill Date 07/02/2000 Checked By: E.S

SUBSURFACE PROFILE Sample Information

.n Standard Water Content %Description E E Penetration Test

-X E blows/ft__ ___E _ _ E _ . 0-WI

a ai o 03 0 20 40 20 40 60o) Co C) z I. 0•1 cr o- 0

f0r m Ground Surface 0

0 0 Too soil of dark bravvnish slightly 4 __ -_ __ _ .___2 I 1To sil314.22.: ma st to moist very stiff sl ty clay

1 with little gravels of limestone.4 ~~~Mailstone

5--- _ Creamy, fractured, medium thick 13tto thickly bedded, moderately

76 w; 2 _ xveak to moderately strong2, marlstone wth thin fillings of

8 brownish silty clay and marl, and 1 .89 with some interbeddings of

moderately strong limestone. 2 51 133.7 2.010

0 3

2

3 4 17

4

437 _3 X >, 805 9-7.

7-

68 ____oic iesoe 0.8__ _

9 1o 6 .

4 )2

~3 7

45 7.8

RQD R aDolomitic limestone 306 87 Darkv grayish, thickly bedded, 1

8 moderately strong dolorniticlimestone. 5

RQD~ Rock Quality Designation DD: Dry DensityARAB CENTER FOR

RR: Recovery Ratio ENGINEERING STUDIES Wp, WI: Plastic & Liquid Limits

qu- Unconfined Compressive Strength Sheet: 1 of 1

Aninex 5.1, Geological Log, Borehole 1

Annex 5.2

Groundwater Abstractions

ANNEX 5.2

GROUND WA TER ABSTRACTIONS

Table Sa Well Data, Northern West Bank, Domestic Water Supply Wells

I Arrabe 17-20/051A Bethan 1 18-18/037Co-ordinates 171250, 200900 Co-ordinates 180150, 185400Elevation (mAD) 250 Elevation (mAD) 216.86Well Depth (m) 370 Well Depth (m) 745Static WL (m bgl) 244 Static WL (m bgl) 160.05Aquifer Upper Aquifer UpperGeological Log see Table 5.11 Geological Log

38.06 m bgl12 Sanur 16-19/012 361 mbgl Base Abu Dis Fm

Co-ordinates 169460, 193410 459 m bglElevation (mAD) 295 622 m bgl Base Bethlehem FmWell Depth (mn) 466 > 745 m bglStatic WL (m bgl) Approx 270Aquifer Upper 9 Bethan 2 18-181038

Geological Log see Table 5.12 Co-ordinates 182750, 185750Elevation (mAD) 90

3 Qabatiya 1 7-20/050Q Well Depth (m) 413Co-ordinates 178800, 201470 Aquifer UpperElevation (mAD) 300 Geological LogWell Depth (m) 254.79 0 m bglStatic WL (m bgl) 65.58 280 m bgl Base Bethlehem FmAquifer Jenin Sub Series 395 m bgl

> 413 m bgl Base Yatta Fm

4 Ya'Bad 16-20/003Co-ordinates 167000,205380 1 Fara'a Expl 18-18/017Elevation (mAD) 270 Co-ordinates 182500, 189650Well Depth (m) 296 Elevation (mAD) 196.5Static WL (m bgl) ? Well Depth (m) 77Aquifer Upper (W. Basin)]

|_11 Deir Sharaf 2A 16-18/003Ao Jenin 2 17-62091051J {o-ordinates 166750, 18475

Co-ordinates 176300,209100 Elevation (10AD) 272Elevation (mAD) 140.02 Well Depth (m) 670Well Depth (m) 933 Aquifer LowerStatic WL (m bgl) 179.6Aquifer Upper 12 Beit Iba Well 16-18/005Geological Log Co-ordinates 168900, 183000

21 m bgl Elevation (mAD) 330> 59 m bgl Base Bethlehem Fm Weli Depth (m) 595

-Aquifer Lower6 Nablus 17-17/003|

Co-ordinates 175800, 172800 | 13 Taffuh 17-171002Elevation (mAD) 510 Co-ordinates 174480, 171220Well Depth (m) 525 Elevation (mAD) 500Aquifer | Lower Aquifer Lower

7 Machane Horon 17-17/001 | 14 Jenin | 17-201033JCo-ordinates j 176100, 174900 ICo-ordinates I 178000. 207500Elevation (mAD) 500Well Depth (m) 585Aquifer Lower

Table Sb Well Data, Northern West Bank, Eocene Water Supply Wells

Abdallah 'Irsan 17-19/002 [7 Muhammad 'Adeb 17-20/005QJarran Al FattahCo-ordinates 175000, 198320 Co-ordinates 174400,202050Elevation (mnAD) 365 Elevation (mAD) 130Well Depth (m) 147 Well Depth (m) 151Water Use Agricultural Water Use AgriculturalGeological Unit Eocene Geological Urit Jenin Sub Series

Muh. Y. Abu Al 17-20/016Q J Ameen Ahmed 17-20/009QRub - YusefCo-ordinates 174400, 203550 Co-ordinates 174400, 203300Elevation (MAOD) 255 Elevation (mAD) 255Water Use Agricultural Water Use AgriculturalGeological Unit Jenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

C Mazin Abdel Hadi 17-20/001A K Adeeb Nazzai 17-20/01 IQCo-ordinates 172480, 201900 Co-ordinates 174220, 203730Elevation (mAD) 265 Elevation (mAD) 255Water Use Agricultural Water Use AgriculturalGeological Unit Eocene Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

D Muhammad Abu 17-20/007 L Fatemah Abu Al 17-20/012JNa'lm RubCo-ordinates 172580, 201780 Co-ordinates 174450, 202750Elevation (mAD) 270 Elevation (AD) 270Water Use Agricultural Water Use AgriculturalGeological Unit Jenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

E Omar al Sadaq 17-20/001B [ Isma'Eel Nazzal 17-20/012QCo-ordinates 172580, 201780 Co-ordinates 174480, 204060Elevation (mAD) 270 Elevation (AD) 255Water Use Agricultural Well Depth (m) 62Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Water Use Agricultural

_Haj_Adeeb_Tarir_q 17__ 20__00_ QGeological Unit Jenin Sub Series|

| I F Haj Adeeb Tarifiq | 17-20!Ol ________ _________

Co-ordinates 174220, 203730 N Fawz Sulayman 17-20/015QElevation (AD) 255 Co-ordinates j 174600, 203850Water Use | Agricultural Elevation (MAOD) 260Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Well Depth (m) 70

|Water Use Agricultural| G |Hatem Senam | 17-20/014A Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series|

Co-ordinates 172100 , 202060_Elevation (mAD) 255 | Army Well 5 17-19/005Total Depth (m) 102 Co-ordinates 174450,197200Water Use Agricultural Elevation (mAD) 353Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series| Water Use ?

|Geological UJnit Eocene|H Qabatyah Nursery 17-20/014Q|

Co-ordinates 174080, 204000 P Jansur I 17-20/039QElevation (NMAOD) 260 Co-ordinates 174660, 203750Total Depth (m) 62 Elevation (MAOD) 258Water Use Agricultural Water Use AgriculturalGeological Unit Jenin Sub Series| Geological Unit Jcnin Sub Series

2

Table Sb Well Data, Northern West Bank, Eocene Water Supply Wells (continued)

Mohammed Nazzai 17-201003Q V Ahmad Khaleel 17-20/041QMusa

Co-ordinates 173920, 204160 Co-rdinates 174800, 203200

Elevation (mAD) 255 Elevation (mAD) 260

Water Use Agricultural Well Depth (m) 90

Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Water Use Agricultural

Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

R Mub. Yaseen Abu 17-20/032A w Muh. Abu Al Rub 17-20/017Q

Al Rub l

Co-ordinates 172870, 200960 Co-ordinates 174550, 203100

Elevation (mAD) 295 Elevation (mAD) 255

Water Use Agricultural Water Use Agricultural

Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

7 Omar'Al Shan & 17-20/018Q [X Muh. Al Haj 17-20/023J

Hai A. Muh. Yassen

Co-ordinates 172620, 204990 Co-ordinates 172870, 200910

Elevation (mAD) 242 Elevation (mAD) 310

Water Use Agricultural Water Use Agricultural

Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

Abed al Rahman 17-20/024A - MMuh. Kbaleel 17-20/040A

Nazzai Musa

Co-ordinates 173350, 201700 Co-ordinates 173310, 201810

Elevation (mAD) 280 Elevation (mAD) 285

Well Depth (in) 59 Well Depth (m) 70

Water Use Agricultural Water Use Agricultural

Geological Unit lenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series

U Yusef'Abed Al 17-20/038Q Z Tawfeeq Shaikh | 17-20/049A

Raheem Ahmad

Co-ordinates 174360, 204000 Co-ordinates 172800. 205000

Elevation (mAD) 258 Elevation (AD) 245

Water Use Agricultural Water Use Agricultural

Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series Geological Unit Jenin Sub Series|

3

Annex 5.3

Major Flora and Fauna of theWest Bank

Major Flora & Fauna of the West Bank

Ammophila Littoralis Rothm.

Pistacia Palestina Boiss

Sarcopoterium Spinosum

Quercus Ithaburensis Deene.

Gymnocarpos Decandrum Forssk

Rumex Rothschildianus

Ceratonia Siliqua L.

Salsola vermiculata

Coridothymus Capitatus L.

Orchis Italica

Zilla Spinosa

Quercus Calliprinos Webb l

Hyparrhenia Hirta

Iris Histria

Artemisia Monosperma Del.

Acacia Radddiana Savi i•Vjl 1

Inula Viscosa

Scilla Hohenackeri Ow1 )

Zygophyllum Dumosum Boiss.

Dianthus Pendulus jL_1

Phragmites Australis (Cav.) .

Atriplex Halimus J) 3

Calycotome Villosa (Poir.)

Cistus Creticus.

Prosopis Farcta (,Wl Jy+) W

Nymphaea Cocrulea Savingny

Pistacia Saportae Burn.

Ficus Pseudo-Sycomorus Decno

Hyphaene Thebaica (Del.)

Cyperus Articulatus .

Balanites Aegyptiaca

Asplenium Adiantum-Nigrum L. jll >

Cupressus Sempervirens L. 4- 3->

Acacia Laeta R.

Iris Pseudacorus L.

Lilium Candidum L.

Juniperus Oxycedrus L.

Paeonia Mascula L.

Prunus Ursina Ky. ,j a

Cyclamen Coum Mill JI3i s

Cyperus Alopecuroides Rottb. a ,L ;

Ophioglossum *i J

Lioydia Rubroviridis

Maerua Crassifolia Frossk.

Thelypteris Palustris Schott.

Pteris Vittata L. 9

Eriolobus Trilobate(Labill.)

Narcissus Serotinus L. uf )--

Suadea asphaltica -- 1

Eurocaria sp.

Malva spp.

Poa bulbosa

Scorzonera judaica

Hordium spontatium

Anthimis spp. jl

Centuria spp. J-P

Mellilotus spp.

Teucrium polium

Retama raetam

Tamarix nilotica

Salvadora persica L11 I-l

Thymus capitatus

Aayrex officinales

Gundelia tournefortii

Cichorium intybus

Thymelia hirsuta

Bullota undolata

Urginea maritima

Carlinia spp. j

Echinops spp.

......... . ............... .....

Asiatic Jackal, Caniis a2r7e7zs syriaclis ( Ls( ) CSy

Wolf, Caniis lupus pallipes

Red Fox, vulpes v2ulpes palaestin7a (44 >) Li

Sand Fox, vrilpes ruippeli sabaea . JL '1

Badger, Meles meles canesenes

Ichneumon, Heipestes ichzeu mot

Striped Hyaena, Hyaena Hyaen7a syriaca l

Wild Cat us

Caracal Lynx

Mountain Gazalle, Gazalle gazalle

Goitered Gazalle, G. subgottutrosa marico

Ibex j.L

Lepus capensis, (hare)

Rock Dove s

Stock Dove (4, ) I

Turtle Dove >gk 0_>11) ¢Lp

European Bee-Eater 3JL]

Hoopoe

Black Kite i 1

Golden Eagle yl

Spotted Eagle i ji

Griffen Vulture (v) j)

Chukar, Alectoris chlkar sinaica (-J^i )

Quail, Coturniix coturinix coturnix )&1

Owl .~~~~~~~~~~~~~?Y

Lark s1

Swallow

IPipit I jJP

Annex 5.4

Interviewed People - Culturaland Religious HeritageAssessment

ANNEX 5.4

LIST OF INTER VIE WED PEOPLE -

CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE ASSESSMENT

List of interviewed people:

* Grocer from El Fahme;* Man who plougbs the land El Haj Ahmed-Ali Elassan Ibrahim;

* Two community members of El Fahme camp;

* El Aluany family;* Abdel Mina'im Abu El Wafat family; and

* Shawaheen brothers.

Annex 8.1

Environmental ManagementPlan for the Waste DisposalComponent of Project Proposals

ANNEX 8.1

ENVIRONMENTAL A1NA GEMENT PLAN FOR THE WASTE DISPOSALCOMPONENT OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

This Annex provides a detailed draft Environmental Management Plan (EMP) coveringall of the issues and potential impacts identified in Section 6 of the EnvironmentalAssessment.

The EMP is, of necessity, detailed and comprehensive in an attempt to highlight that,irrespective of high standards of site construction, significant environmental impactscould follow from the development of the landfill site if it is not managed and operatedto appropriate standards. Accordingly, the EMP identifies:

* all key mitigation measures required for successful project implementation (whetheror not these are already included in the project design, Section 3);

* any associated compliance monitoring recommended to ensure successfulimplementation of the proposed mitigation measures;

* the environmental monitoring programme recommended to assess and evaluate theongoing environmental impacts of project development; and

* the institutional arrangements and responsibilities borne by each party for executionof the mitigation measures and for compliance and environmental monitoring.

Environmental monitoring requirements and institutional arrangements andresponsibilities are discussed in the Section 8 of the Environmental Assessment. ThisAnnex focuses on the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan component of the overall EMP.

The Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is subdivided into the five principal phases ofproject activity. In this respect the Plan is indicative since different activities (e.g.construction, operations and restoration/closure) may be ongoing in different parts ofthe site at the same time once the site is commissioned and is fully operational. The fivephases are:

C] Pre-construction;w Construction;J Operations;El Closure and Restoration; andnK Aftercare.

It should also be noted that similar impacts, and associated mitigation measures, maybe envisaged in more than one phase of project activity.

Relevant provisions of the EMP will be incorporated into the Contract Documentsprepared for project implementation, thereby, as far as construction and operationalactivities are concerned, forming a binding contractual obligation on the contractor(s)appointed to implement the project proposals.

ENVIRONMENTAL REsOURCES MANAGEMENT METAP/EIBIWoRLDBANK

A.8.1

Table A8.Ia Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Pre-Construction Phlase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure When required Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method Responsibility

Completion of site Potential loss of Continued access to, and use of, land for Jenin Continuously until tJnobstructed access to the site MoLG

acquisition agricultural production of agricultural production, if requested and Municipality possession of project for the planting and harvesting

acquired areas. required. site by appointed of cropsconstructioncontractor

Attraction of squatters to Fencing of the site upon acquisition; Jenin Continuously until Absence of unauthorised MoLG

the site prior to site Employment of local resident as watchman. Municipality/ possession of project occupation of any part of thedevelopment. JSC site by appointed site - visual inspection

constructioncontractor

Uncontrolled dumping of Fencing of the site upon acquisition; Jenin Continuously until Absence of MSW on any part MoLGwaste at the site prior to Employment of local resident as watchman. Municipality/ possession of project of the site - visual inspection

site development. JSC site by appointedconstructioncontractor

ENVIRONMENTAL R±OsRCFS MANAGFMWNr METAPRIB/tWORLDBANK

A.8.2

TableA8.Jb Mitigation and Monitoring Planfor Construction Plhase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill

Repnsbilty Mitiation Monitorn Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure fesponsibiiy When required Mtigi oiong MoEnforcement

for Execution Measure & Method Responsibility

General site Contamination of water Isolation of areas by small bunds; Construction Contingency measure Civil works contract - visual PtJ of JSC

clearing, soil resources by suspended Undertake scraping during the dry season; Contractor during the inspection of project site and and MEnA

scraping, solids during site clearing Provision of silt traps on all drains, tcmporary winter/rainy season contractor's monthly progress

excavation (soil activities. and permanent; reports

and rock) and Covering of stockpiled soil with temporary cover

backfilling (e.g. tarpaulin) or by seeding.

Dust generation and escape Damping of working area during dry days; Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSC

of fugitive dust off-site Planting of buffer trees and vegetation as wind Contractor construction activities inspection, monitoring of and MEnA

breaks; project site and contractor's

Provision of temporary wind breaks on windy monthly progress reports

days.

Noise generation due to Appropriate mulllers fitted to all mobile plant Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSC

operation of mobile plant and equipment for noise suppression; Contractor construction activities inspection, monitoring of and MEnA

and equipment Use of temporary noise fence; project site and contractor's

Preventative maintenance and plant servicing. monthly progress reports

Increase in off-site tratfic Traffic management plan to ensure delivery of Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSC

due to delivery of materials during non-peak hours; Contractor construction activities inspection, monitoring of and MEnA

construction materials to Minimise material imports through sourcing of project site and contractor's

site materials on-site as far as practicable. monthly progress reports

Attraction of immigrants to Planning authorities to ensure that new Jenin Continuously Monitoring of developments in MoLG and

the project site and settlements are not permitted adjacent to site; Municipality/ communities adjacent to the PIU of JSC

surrounding area as a Priority to be given to established local residents JSC project sitc

consequence of in the hiring of casual labour. Contractor's staff records - six

employment opportunities monthly submission

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAP/EI1BWORLi1 BANK

A.8.3

Table A8.1b Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Construction Plhase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (continued)

Project Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Responsibility When required Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProecAcivtytMitigation Mfor Execution Measure & Method Enforcement

Responsibility

Potential for injury to local Provision of perimeter tence around the whole of Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PRU of JSC

people from site the project site; Contractor construction (and inspection, monitoring of and MenA

construction activities Provision of security gate and guardhouse at the operation) activitics project site and contractor's

site entrance; monthly progress reports

Employmcnt of watchman to provide sitesecurity 24 hours per day.

Displacement of flora and Creation of bufler zones around the landfill Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSC

fauna footprint; Contractor site construction (and inspection, monitoring of and MenA

Creation of new habitats and niches through re- operation) project site and contractor's

planting; monthly progress reports

Planting of buffer zones with native specics.

Aesthetic transformation of Screening of the site from surrounding areas Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PIUJ of JSC

site through the vegetative planting of the buffer Contractor site construction (and inspection, monitoring of and MenA

zones, particularly adjacent to any sensitive operation) project site and contractor's

receivers. monthly progress reports

Excavation of rock Noise generated by rock Restriction of rock blasting to specified times Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSC

for earthworks and blasting, rock breaking and daily; Contractor site construction inspection, monitoring of and MenA

landfill bed rock cruslhing Rock breaking and crushing only behind project sitc and contractor's

preparation substantial noise fence. monthly progress reports

Dust generation and escape Damping of stockpiles of rock dust; Construction Continuously during Civil works contract - visual P1U of JSC

of fugitive dust off-site Early use of site materials in site earthworks and Contractor site construction inspection, monitoring of and MenA

from rock crushing backfilling; project site and contractor's

Use of baffle banks around the stone crusher. monthly progress reports

ENVIRO(NMEN IAL RESOURCES MANAGEMEN I METAP/FIB/WORLD BANK

A.8.4

TableA8.1b Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Construction Plhase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (continued)

Project Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Responsibility When required Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andfor Execution Measure & Method Enforcement

ResponsibilityConstruction of Noise, dust and visual Source principal construction materials Construction During relevant Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSCrockfill dams impacts on adjacent immediately adjacent to the locations of each Contractor construction activities inspection, monitoring of and MEnA

sensitive receivers rockfill dam to minimise on-site traffic project site and contractor'smovements; mnonthly progress reportsConcentrate construction activities to completeas rapidly as possible;Work away from the sensitive receivers as far aspracticable.

Construction of the Noise, dust and visual Concentrate construction activities to complete Construction During relevant Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSCwaste reception impacts on adjacent . as rapidly as possible: Contractor construction activitics inspection, monitoring of and MEnAarea and the sensitive receivers Install noise and visual screen between Fahme project site and contractor'sprimary site access Camp and the construction works; monthly progress reportsroad Work away from the sensitive receivers as far as

practicable.

Civil works for site Potential for flooding of Installation/construction of surface water Construction During relevant Civil works contract - visual PIU of JSCdrainage areas upgradient of the site drainage channels as part of the initial site Contractor construction activities inspection, monitoring of and MEnA

construction activities works; project site and contractor'sProvision of peripheral drainage ditches adjacent monthly progress reportsto all permanent site works (e.g. dams, siteroads, waste reception area)

IFNVIRONNIFNrAI. RT'S() R(F:S MANA,17NOFN Il METAJ'/IR3/WORLD 1ANK

A.8.5

Table A8.1c Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for tIhe Operations Phlase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Recution When required Measnfeio Metod Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityHauling of waste to Odour emission and litter Prompt collection and delivery of waste to LA haulers, Continuously Service contract - visual PIU of JSC

the landfill site blow from Refuse minimise decomposition in the RCV or at the privatc haulers inspcction, monitoring at the and MEnA.Collection Vehicles (RCVs) collection point; project site and the Site

along the primary access Open-topped RCVs to use tarpaulins while Operator's monthly progress

road to the site delivering waste to landfill site; rcport

Security fence and tree planting along the edge

of the access road in order to trap blown litter;Assignment of regular litter patrols to collect

blown litter.

IPotenitial Ibr injury to local TIrallic management plan to ensure delivery of' LA haulers, Continuously Service contract - visual PIU of JSC

people from increased waste outside of non-peak hours; private haulers inspection, monitoring at the and MEnA.traffic movements along the Provision of security fence along the primary site and Site project site and the Site

primary access road access road. Operator Operator's monthly progress

report

Generation of dust from the Provision of asphalt pavement to minimise dust Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSC

passage of RCVs generation; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

Damping of access road as required; inspection, monitoring at the

Provision of windbreak along the access road by project site and the Site

tree planting; Operator's monthly progress

Regular sweeping and cleaning of access road, as reportrequired and at least once per day;

Cleaning and washing of RCV wheels and

chassis prior to departing the site.

General site Attraction of immigrants to Planning authorities should ensure that new Jenin Continuously Monitoring of developments in MoLG and

operations the project site and squatter settlements are not permitted on and Municipality communities adjacent to the PIU of JSC

surrounding area as a adjacent to site; project site

consequence of Priority to be given to established local residents Site Operator's staff records -

employment opportunities in the hiring of site stall' six monthly submission

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAPWEIBiWosuL BANK

A.8.6

TableA8.Ic Mitigation and Monitoring Planfor the Operations Phlase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (contiinued)

Resosbilty Mitigtion Monitoring Monitoring andiProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure fesponsriiioy When required Meigation Metod Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityPotential for injury to local Perimeter fencc around the project site and Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCpeople from site operations. security gate and guardhouse at the site cntrance; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

Site marshall to control and be responsible for inspection, monitoring at theoperations at the working face; project site and the SiteEmployment of watchman to provide site Operator's monthly progresssecurity 24 hours per day. report

Reduction in local property Strict implementation of the mitigation measures Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCand land values stipulated in this EMP; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

Enforcement of the specified standards inspection, monitoring at theenvisaged tbr site operations. project site and the Site

Operator's monthly progressreport

Loss of agricultural Strict implementation of the mitigation measures Site Operator Continuously for site Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCproduction on adjacent stipulated in this EMP; and JSC (as operations. Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.properties Enforcement of the specified standards required) inspection, monitoring at the

envisaged for site operations; Acquisition or land project site and the Site MoLG,Acquisition of affected plots and provision of swap only as a Operator's monthly progress as requiredalternative land unaffected by site operations or, contingency report.alternatively, financial compensation for verified Crop records from adjacentlosses of production. property lots.

Loss or impairment of Landscaping/vegetative planting of buffer zones; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCvisual amenity Phased development of site in order to minimise Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

the extent of the site under development; inspection, monitoring at theCellular method of filling to minimise the area of project site and the Siteactive waste deposition; Operator's monthly progressEarly completion of filling in areas closest to reportpotentially sensitive receivers;Direction of filling away from sensitivereceivers.

FNVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAPIEIB/WORLD BANK

A.8.7

Table AS.lc Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Operations Phase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (continued)

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure fonsibility When required Measure & Method Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityWaste inspection Receipt of unacceptable, Formal, specified and regulated inspection Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSC

and recording incompatible or ha7ardous procedures to be adopted at the WltA; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.wastes tbr landlilling Inspection ot all waste loads prior to inspection, monitoring at the

incorporation into the active depositional area; project site and the SiteStorage of unacceptable wastes in a specially Operator's monthly progressdesignated quarantine area; reportProvision of laboratory and test kits on-site to aidchecking of suspcet waste loads.

Haulage of wvaste Dust generation due to Damping of on-site haulage/service roads; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCwithin the site vehicle movements Asphalt surfacing of main service roads in order Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

to mzinimise dust gcneration; inspection, monitoring at theRcguLiar swccping and clcaniing ol'scrvicc roads, project site and the Siteas required. Operator's monthly progress

report

Deposition of MSW Litter blow off-site during Provision of movable screen/fence at working Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCdischarge of MSW from face to trap blown litter; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.RCVs and spreading of Immediate compaction of deposited waste; inspection, monitoring at thewaste Application of daily cover at the end of the day's project site and the Site

operation. Operator's monthly progressreport

Generation of dust from Covering of stockpiled cover material; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCspreading, compaction and Usc of construction debris delivered to site, Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

covering of deposited waste already a part of the waste stream; inspection, monitoring at theUse of plastic sheeting or hessian matting as an project site and the Sitealternative cover material; Operator's monthly progressRe-circulation of Icachate to freshly deposited rcportwaste in order to damp down the working area;Use of temporary windbreaks and bafiles inwindy conditions.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAPEIB/WORLD BANK

A.8.8

Table A8. Ic Mitigation aid Moniitoring Plat for tile Operations Phase A clivitiev at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (continued)

Responsibility Mitgation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Responsibility When required Measure & Method Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityPotential failure of waste Lift height restricted to 2.5 m; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCslopes Maximum working gradient of ] v:4h; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

Compaction of waste. inspection, monitoring at theproject site and the SiteOperator's monthly progressreport

Noise generated from Appropriate mufflers fitted to all mobile plant Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations Plt of JSCmobile plant and equipment and equipment for noise suppression; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.used in site operations Preventative maintenance and servicing of site inspection, monitoring at the

mobile plant and equipment; project site and the SiteUse of temporary noise fence adjacent to the Operator's monthlv progressactive cell. report

Odour impacts from Immediate compaction of deposited waste; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCdeposited and decomposing Application of daily cover at the end of the day's Plan/contract - visual and MEnA,waste operation. inspection, monitoring at the

project site and the SiteOperator's monthly progressreport

Transmission of disease to Prompt spreading and compaction of waste upon Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSClocal communities around discharge from the RCV: Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.the site Application of daily cover; inspection, monitoring at the

Regular inspections to ensure that infestations project site and the Siteare not occurring; Operator's monthly progressUse of pest control measures, including reportpesticides/ insecticides as required.Disposal of special wastes in a designated,separate special waste cell if required.

I,NVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES NIANAGEMENT METAP!EIB/WoRLD BANK

A.8.9

Table A8. Ic Mitigationt anid Moitlorinig Plan for thle Operationis Plhase Activities at Zaharat Fi,,jan Landfill (continued)

Project Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Responsibility When required Measi re t i Metoiod Enforcement

ResponsibilityRisk of fire and air quality Prohibition of waste burning on site; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCimpacts from burning of Banning of waste scavenging activities on-site; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.waste on-site Emergency procedures specified to deal with inspection, monitoring at the

incoming waste loads that are on fire; project site and the SiteEmergency procedures specified to deal with Operator's monthly progressdeposited waste on fire; reportInspection of waste prior to incorporation intothe active disposal area.

Leachate collection Potential contamination of Containment engineering, undertaken under Construction Continuously As-built records for the civil PIU of JSC

and treatment groundwater and surface strict CQA procedures; Contractor and works, together with CQA and MEnA.water resources from Installation of double lining system on the base Site Operator records.leachate emissions of the landfill where leachate will accumulate;resulting from waste Interdrain layer between the 2 lining systems to Subsequently, adherence to thedisposal monitor seepage through the primary basal liner; Operations Plan/contract -

Leachate collection system above the primary visual inspection, monitoring atliner), graded to provide drainage by gravity to the project site and thethe outside of the landfill; Construction Contractor's andLeachate conveyance pipes to a treatment pond, Site Operator's monthlywith 60 days retention capacity, where leachate progress reports.can be oxygenated and evaporated;Provision for re-circulation of leachate back to Monitoring of leachate volumesdeposited waste; from leachate collectionAdditional storage capacity provided by system.emergency tanks or storage temporary in landfill;No discharge of untreated leachate effluent off- Monitoring of leachate volumessite prior to adequate treatment; from interdrain layer.Adoption of cellular method of filling tominimise the potential for leachate production;Temporary capping of inactive areas'Capping of the site upoIl completion of filling inorder to minimise leachate production.

FNVIRONllN rAL RfsoijRcrs MANAGrMENT METAPE113/WoRl.D 13ANK

A.8.10

Table A8.1c Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for thte Operations Plhase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (conttinued)

Project Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Responsibiity When required Measure & Method eonfiorcinatResponsibility

Potential contamination of Isolation of areas by bunding or berm; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCsurface water due to Landfilling by cellular method; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.suspended sediments Use of alternative cover materials such as plastic inspection, monitoring at thebrought about by movement sheeting or hessian matting project site and the Siteof soil cover materials Operator's monthly progress

report

Odour impacts from Re-circulation under favourable climatic Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCIcachate collcction and conditions; Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.treatment Use of odour conteractant, as necessary; inspection, monitoring at the

Commissioning of on-site treatment plant if project site and the Siteodours are persistent and objectionable Operator's monthly progress

report

Landfill gas Injury or loss of life from Pre-treatment or composting of organic waste Site Operator Continuously As-built records for the civil PUJ of JSCcollection and exposure to, or explosion of fraction, minimising landfill gas generation; works, together with CQA and MEnA.treatment landfill gas Containment engineering consisting of records.

impermeable lining and cover to preventmigration of landfill gas off site, undertaken Subsequently, adherence to theunder strict CQA procedures; Operations Plan/contract -Installation ol'gas collection wells and passive visual inspection, monitoring atgas vents; the project site and theUse of 1laring systenm when necessary. Construction Contractor's and

Site Operator's monthlyprogress reports

Odour impacts from landfill Installation of gas collection wells to facilitate Site Operator Continuously once Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCgas gas abstraction from the landfill; gas generation Plan/contract -- visual and MEnA.

Use of mobile and/or fixed flare stack to combust recorded at the site inspection, monitoring at thegas and avoid venting of untreated landfill gas; project site and the SiteActive gas abstraction system, if required. Operator's monthly progress

report

ENVIRONMIENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAP/EIB/WoUDBANK

A.8.1I

Table A8.1c Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Operations Phase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (continued)

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Recution When required Measure & MetEod Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityEcological degradation due Installation of gas collection wells to facilitate Site Operator Continuously once Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCto methane gas cmission as gas abstraction from the landfill; gas generation Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.greenhouse gas. tJse of rnobile and/or fixed flare stack to combust recorded at the site inspection, monitoring at the

gas and avoid venting of untreated landfill gas. project site and the SiteOperator's monthly progressreport

FNVIRONMENTAL RESOuRCES MANAGEMENT METAPBEIA/WORLD BANK

A. 12

TableA8.ld Mitigation andMonitoringPlanfor Closure and Restoration Phlase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure recution When required Measue& Method Enforcement

for Execution Measure ~~~~~~~~ResponsibilitySite grading and Dust generation and escape Damping of wvorking area during dry days; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Restoration PiU of JSCcapping and of fugitive dust off-site due Planting of buffer trees/vegetation as wind Plan and the Operations and MEnA.placement of to equipment operation and breaks; contract - visual inspection,

drainage system soil movement Provision of temporary wind breaks on windy monitoring at the project siteand after-use soil days. and the Site Operator'scover monthly progress report

Noise generation due to Appropriate mufflers fitted to all mobile plant Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PllI of JSCequipment operation and equipment for noise suppression; Plan and the Operations and MEnA.

Preventative maintenance and servicing of contract - visual inspection,operational mobile plant and equipment; monitoring at the project siteUse of temporary noise fence adjacent to the area and the Site Operator'sbeing capped and restored; monthly progress reportPlanting of buffer zones with trees and shrubs.

Increase in off-site tratlic Traffic management plan to ensure delivery of Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Restoration PIU of JSCdue to delivery of materials during non-peak hours; Plan and the Operations and MEnA.construction materials to Minimise material imports through sourcing of contract - visual inspection,site materials on-site as far as practicable. monitoring at the project site

and the Site Operator'smonthly progress report

Potential contamination of Provision of landfill cap to minimise rainfall Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCgroundwater and surface infiltration and leachate generation; Plan and the Operations and MEnA.water resources from Re-circulation of leachate to active areas ol the contract - visual inspection,leachatc emissions site to reduce leachate volumes; monitoring at the project siteresulting from waste I'emporary capping/covering of inactive areas. and the Site Operator'sdisposal monthly progress report

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAPIEIBAVoRLD BANK

A.8.13

TableA8.1d Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Closure and Restoration Plhase Activities at Zaharat Finjan Landfill (continued)

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Recution When required Measure & Method Enforcement

for Execution Measnre & Method ~~~ResponsibilityPotential surface water Construction of silt traps; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCcontamination due to Provision of temporary drains during capping Plan and the Operations and MEnA.movement of soil materials operations; contract - visual inspection,that could generate Provision of permanent drains around the edge of monitoring at the project sitesuspended sediments the landfill. and the Site Operator's

monthly progress report

Odour impacts from landfill Provision of landfill cap to minimise Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Operations PIU of JSCgas uncontrolled migration of landfill gas from Plan and the Operations and MEnA.

completed parts of the landfill; contract - visual inspection,Installation of gas collection wells to facilitate monitoring at the project sitegas abstraction from the landfill; and the Site Operator'sUse of mobile and/or fixed flare stack to combust monthly progress reportgas and avoid venting of untreated landfill gas.

ENVIRONMENTAL RFSOURCES.MANAGEMENT METAP/EI8/WoRL BANK

A.8.14

Table A8.1e Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Aftercare Phase Activities at Zaliarat Finjan Landfill

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure for Execution When required Measure & Method Enforcement

Activity for Execution Measure & Method ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Responsibility

Leachate collection Potential contamination of Continuous monitoring of leachate production; JSC Until deposited waste Review of leachate quantities MEnA

and treatment groundwater and surface Abstraction of leachate from the landfill; has stabilised and quality.water resources from Treatment of leachate at leachate Review of settlementleachate emissions treatment/evaporation pond. measurcments on the

resulting from waste completed landfilldisposal

Landfill gas Odour impacts from landfill Continuous monitoring of the quantity and JSC Until deposited waste Review of landfill gas MEnA

collection and gas quality of landfill gas production; has stabilised quantities and quality.treatment Use of mobile and/or fixed flare stack to combust Review of settlement

gas and avoid ventinig of untreated landtill gas. measurements on thecompleted landfill

Maintenance of Breach of containment Maintenance of site infrastructure works, JSC Until deposited waste Review of leachate and landfill MEnA

necessary landfill engineering leading to particularly for leachate and landfill gas control has stabilised gas quantities - visualinfrastructure and enhanced levels of leachate and treatmieicnt; inspection, monitoring at thecomponents generation, leachate Surveys of the integrity of the final capping and project site and the JSC's

emissions or landfill gas cover system; annual environmental auditemissions Repair and refilling of areas subject to settlement report

or cracking;Replanting of restored surface as required.

ENVIRONMFNTAL RESOURCES MANAGFMHN r MEITAP/EtB/WORo DBANK

A.8.15

Table A8.2a Enihancement and Monitoring Plan for Positive Environmtental Benefits at Zaharat Finjan Landfill

Project Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure Responsibility When required Measurem& Method Enforcnment

ResponsibilityConstruction and Creation of temporary and Priority to be given to unemployed local Construction Continuously during Contractor's staffrecords - six PIU of JSCSite Operations permanent employment rcsidents in the hiring of casual and permanent Contractor and project monthly submission

opportunities labour. Site Operator implementation anddevelopment

Site Restoration Reinstatement of fertile soil Placement of after-use soil cover, 0.6 m thick, Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Restoration PIU of JSCprofile that can support vegetation growth. Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.

inspection, monitoring at theproject site and the Operator'smonthly progress report

Seeding and Improvement of soil Immediate seeding and planting after placement Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Restoration PIU of JSCreplanting of the structure due to vegetative of after-use soil covcr Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.restored surface growth inspection, monitoring at the

project site and the Operator'smonthly progress report

Reduction in surface Maximum gradient no greater than I v:4h; Site Operator Continuously Adherence to the Restoration PTU of JSCerosion and increase in Immediate seeding and planting after placement Plan/contract - visual and MEnA.slope stability of after-use soil cover to control run-off, inspection, monitoring at the

Provision of contour drains to reduce run-off project site and the Operator'svelocity. monthly progress report

Creation of productive land Land use of restored site shall be planned to JSC Upon completion and Adherence to the agreed MEnAupon closure and benefit majority of local residents. closure of the entire Restoration Plan - visual siterestoration landfill inspection

Extension of floral and Maintaining growth of plants and trees on the JSC Upon completion and Adherence to the agreed MEnAfaunal habitats and creation restored site; closure of the entire Restoration Plan - visual siteof new habitats Potential to develop a variety of diffcrent landfill inspection and annual

habitats. environmental audit

ENVIRONMENTALRESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAP/EIB/WoRLa BANK

A.8.16

Table A 8.3a Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Rehtabilitation and Closure of Category I Dunmp Sites in Jenin Governorate

Resosbiity Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure fespor sibiity When required Measuren Metod Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityRchabilitation of Croundwater and surface Drainage and collection of leachate prior to any Contractor/ Continuously from Civil works contract MEnA

dump sites water contamination due to extensive site works; JSC the initiation of the specifications and temporary

release of residual leachate Installation of toe drains; project until the final operations contract - visual

during earthworks at the Evaporation of collected leachate; closure of the dump inspection and monthly audit

site Restrict remedial engineering to summer time or

periods of dry weather in winter.

Dust gcneration and blown Damping of working areas during dry days; Contractor/ Continuously from Civil works contract MEnA

litter due to site Installation of temporary litter fence around JSC the initiation of the specifications and temporary

preparation, equipment working areas; project until the final operations contract - visual

operation and waste mining Provide all-weather access road; closure of the dump inspection and monthly audit

Maintain and clean access road regularly.

Noise generation due to Restriction of waste mining to the daytime; Contractor/ Continuously from Civil works contract MEnA

equipment operation Fitting equipment with appropriate mufflers. JSC the initiation of the specifications and temporary

project until the final operations contract - visual

closure of the dump inspection and monthly audit

Closure of dump Loss of livelihood Provide alternative employment opportunities at JSC Contingency measure No reduction in the available PIU of JSC/

sites opportunities to wastc ZF landfill when open or elsewhere within the for any dump site so household income World Bank

pickers Local Authority service affected

Dust generation during Damnping of working areas during dry days; Contractor/ Continuously during Works contract specifications - MEnA

application of Place cover materials under favourable climatic JSC site works to close the visual random inspection. Log

capping/cover soil conditions dump site of complaints from local

communities

Off-site traflic impacts duc Scheduling of materials deliverics to ofT-peak Contractor/ Continuously during Works contract specifications - PIU of JSC

to importation of capping hours JSC site works to close the visual random inspection. Log

and covering materials dump site of complaints from local

communities.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAP/E0B'WoRmL BANK

A.8.17

Table A8.3b Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Rehabilitation and Closure of Category I Dump Sites in Jenin Governorate

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure . When required Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method Responsibility

Rehabilitation of Groundwater and surface Drainage and collection of leachate prior to any Contractorl Continuously from Works contract specifications - MEnA

dump sites water contamination duc to extensive site works; JSC the initiation of the visual inspection and monthly

release of residual leachate Installation ol'toe drains; project until the linal audit. Register/logof

during earthwvorks at the Evaporation orcollected leachate; closure of the dump complaints from local

site Restrict remedial engineering to summer time or communities

periods of dry weather in winter.

Dust generation and blown Damping of xvorkinig areas during dry days; Contractor/ Continuously from Works contract specifications - MEnA

litter due to site Installation of temporary litter fence around JSC the initiation of the visual inspection and monthly

preparation, equipment working areas; project until the final audit. Log of complaints from

operation and waste mining Form/improve site access and internal site roads closure of the dump local communities

using construction debris;Maintain access road regularly.

Noise generation due to Restriction of waste mining to the daytime; Contractor/ Continuously from Works contract specifications - MEnA

equipment operation Fitting equipment with appropriate mufflers. JSC the initiation of the visual inspection and monthlyproject until the final audit. Log of complaints from

closure of the dump local communities

Closure of dump Loss of livelihood Provide alternative employment opportunities at JSC Contingency measure No reduction in the available PIU of J SC/

sites opportunities to waste ZF landfill when open or elsewhere within the for any dump site so household income World Bank

pickers Local Authority service affected

Dust generation during Damping of working areas during dry days; Contractor/ Continuously during Works contract specifications - MEnA

application of Place cover materials under favourable climatic JSC site works to close the visual random inspection. Log

capping/cover soil conditions dump site of complaints from localcommunities

Oll:site trafric impacts due Scheduling of materials deliveries to off-peak Contractor/ Continuously during Works contract specificationis - PIlJ of JSC

to importation of capping hours JSC site works to close the visual random inspection. Log

and covering materials dump site of complaints from localcommunities.

ENVI RONMENrAL R:souRCes MANAGEMENT METAP/ElB./WoRLD BANK

A.8.18

Table A 8.3c Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for Closure of Category III Dump Sites in Jenin Governorate

Resoiility Mitigtion *( Monitoring ottrtg andProject Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Recution When required Measiurn ULetorng Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method Responsibility

Closure of dump Dust generation and blown Installation oftemporary litter fence around Contractor/ Continuously During Civil works contract MEnAsites litter due to site preparation working areas; JSC site works to close the specifications - visual random

activities (moving and Restrict working to periods of favourable dump site inspections. Register/log ofaggregation of waste), climatic conditions complaints from local

equipment operation and communities.

any waste mining orexcavation

Odour impacts from site Restrict working to periods of favourable Contractor! Continuously during Civil works contract MEnA

preparation activities and climatic conditions JSC site works to close the specifications - visual randomany excavation of waste dump site inspections. Registertlog of

complaints from localcommunities.

Noise generation due to Restriction of site works to the daytime; Contractor/ Continuously during Civil works contract MEnAequipment operation Fitting equipment with appropriate mufflers. JSC site works to close thc specifications - visual random

dump site inspections. Register/log ofcomplaints from localcommunities.

Dust generation during Damping of working areas during dry days; Contractor/ Continuously during Civil works contract MEnA

application of Place cover materials under favourable climatic JSC site works to close the specifications - visual randomcapping/cover soil conditions dump site inspections. Register/log of

complaints from localcommunities.

Off-site traffic impacts due Scheduling of materials deliveries to off-peak Contractor/ Continuously during Civil works contract PIU of JSCto importation of capping hours JSC site works to close the specifications - visual randomand covering materials dump site inspections

FNVIRONNIEN rAL RFSOUR(cES MANAGEMENT METAPFEfEIWORLD BANK

A.8.19

Table A 8.4a Enhtancement and Monitoring Plan for Reltabilitation and Closure of Category I Dump Sites in Jenin Governorate

Responsibility Mitigationi Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure Recution When required MEnfation Metod Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method Responsibility

Rehabilitation of Control of leachate Drains to intercept and collect leachate; Contractor/ Continuously from Civil works contract MEnAdump sites generation and leachate Pond for leachate treatment and evaporation; JSC the initiation of the specifications and temporary

quantities, with consequent Re-circulation of leachate under favourable project until the operations contract - visualreduction in potential climatic conditions to reduce leachate volumes; closure of the dump inspection and monthly auditimpact on groundwater Application of daily cover materials to minimisequality leachate generation, especially in winter

Cellular filling sequence to minimise active area

Reduction/elimination of Prohibition of waste burning, eliminating smoke; JSC Continuously from Adherence to short-term MEnAodour and smoke impacts Compaction of waste upon receipt; the initiation of the Operations Plan developed forfrom waste deposition Application of daily cover materials sourced project until the each dump site to be

from inert construction debris closure of the dump rehabilitated - visualinspection and monthly audit

Enhancement of local Immediate spreading and compaction of waste JSC Continuously from Adherence to short-term MEnAcommunity health condition following discharge from RCVs; the initiation of the Operations Plan developed fordue to improved site Prohibition of waste burning; project until the each dump site to beoperations Application of cover materials when available, at closure of the dump rehabilitated - visual

least once a week; inspection and monthly auditUse of portable litter fences.

Closure of'dump Improved public health of Cessation of dunmping; JSC Continuously from Cessation ot'dumping - visual MEnAsites communities in the vicinity Coverijng and capping oll'oflclosed sites; the closure of the inspection and quarterly audit

of each site due to Re-instatement of inert soil profile. dump until theeradication/reduction of commissioning of ZFpotential disease vectors landfilland groundwater impacts

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METAPREIB/WORLD BANK

A.8.20

TabheA8.4a Enhancement and Monitoring Planfor Rehabilitation and Closure of Category I Dump Sites in Jenin Governorate (continued)

Respnsibility Mitigation Monitorint Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure for Execution When required Measure & Method Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~Responsibility

Elimination of air quality Cessation of dumping; ISC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnA

impacts (dust, smoke and Cessation of waste hurning: the closure of the inspection and quarterly audit

odour) and visual impacts Covering and capping off of closed sites. dump until the

from cessation of open commissioning of ZF

dumping landfill

Improvement in local Cessation of dumping; ISC Continuously from Cessation of dumping- visual MEnA

property and land values Cessation of waste burning; the closure of the inspection and annual audit

Covering and capping off of closed sites. dump until thecornmissioning of ZFlandfill

Creation of new habitats Re-instatement of inert soil cover; JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnA

and recstablishlimletit ol' I'lanting of'site with selected species the closure of the inspection and six monthly

native faunal and floral dump until the audit

assemblages commissioning of ZFlandfill

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANACEMENT MEFAP/Et3!WORLD BANK

A.8.21

Table A8. 4b Enhancement and Monitoring Planfor Rehabilitation and Closure of Category II Dump Sites in, Jenin Governorate

Project Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure fonr Execution When required Mitigation Moeitoring Monitoring andResponsibility

Rehabilitation of Control or leachate Where feasible occasional re-circulation of Contractor/ Continuously from Civil works contract MEnA

dump sites generation and leachate leachate to waste under favourable climatic JSC the initiation of the specifications and temporary

quantities, with consequent conditions to reduce leachate volumes; project until the operations contract - visual

reduction in potential Application of daily cover matcrials to minimise commissioning of ZF inspection and monthly audit

impact on groundwater leachate generation, especially in the landfill and the

quality winter/rainy season closure of the dump

Reduction/elimination of Prohibition of waste burning, eliminating smoke; JSC Continuously from Adherence to short-term MEnA

odour and smoke impacts Compaction of waste upon receipt; the initiation of the Operations Plan developed for

from waste deposition Application of daily cover materials sourced project until the each dump site to be

from inert construction debris commissioning of ZF rehabilitated - visuallandfill and the inspection and monthly auditclosure of the dump

Enhancement of local Application of cover materials when available, at JSC Continuously from Adherence to short-term MEnA

community health condition least once a week; the initiation of the Operations Plan developed for

due to improved site Use of portable litter fences. project until the each dump site to be

operations commissioning of ZF rehabilitated - visuallandfill and the inspection and monthly auditclosure of the dump

Closure of dump Improved public health of Cessation of dumping; JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MenA

sites communities in the vicinity Covering and capping off closed sites; the closure of the inspection and monthly audit

of each site due to Where appropriate and affordable, removal of dump until the

eradication/reduction of bulky items of existing waste and deposition to commissioning of ZF

potential disease vectors ZF landfill once commissioned. landfill

and groundwater impacts

[\NVIRONNIENTAL RESOURCES MANACENIENT METAP/EIB/WORLD BANK

A.8.22

TableA8.4b Enhancement and Monitoritng Plan br Rehlabilitation and Closure of Category I Dump Sites in Jenin Governorate (continued)

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure for Execution When required Measure & Method Enforcement

Responsibility

Elimination of air quality Cessation of dumping; JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnAimpacts (dust, smoke and Cessation of waste burning; the closure of the inspection and quarterly auditodour) and visual impacts Covering and capping off of closed sites- dump until thefrom cessation of open commissioning of ZFdumping landfill

Improvement in local Cessation of dumping; JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnAproperty and land values Cessation of waste burning; the closure of the inspection and annual audit

Covering and capping off of closed sites. dump until thecommissioning of ZFlandfill

Creation of new habitats Re-instatement of inert soil cover JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping- visual MEnAand reestablishment of the closure of the inspection and six monthlynative faunal and floral dump until the auditassemblages commissioning of ZF

landfill

ENVIRONfFNTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT METIAEIB/WOLD BANK

A.8.23

Table 8.4c Enhancement andMonitoring Planfor Closure of Category li Dump Sites in Jenin Governorate

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure for Execution When required Measure & Methnd Enforcement

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~Responsibility

Closure of dump Reduction in leachate Application of low capping materials to Contractorl Continuously from Civil works contract MEnA

sites generation and leachate minimise leachate generation, especially in the JSC the initiation of the specifications and temporary

quantities, with consequent winter/rainy season project until the operations contract - visual

reduction in potential commissioning of ZF inspection and monthly audit

impact on groundwater landfill and the

quality closure of the dump

Reduction/elimination of Cessation of waste burning, eliminating smoke JSC Continuously from Adherence to short-term MEtiA

odour and smoke impacts the initiation of the Operations Plan developed for

from waste deposition project until the each dump site to becommissioning of ZF rehabilitated - visuallandfill and the inspection and monthly auditclosure of the dump

Enhancement of local Cessation of waste disposal; JSC Continuously from Adherence to short-term MEnA

community health condition Cessation of waste burning; the initiation of the Operations Plan developed for

due to site closure Covering and capping of the site project until the each dump site to becommissioning of ZF rehabilitated - visuallandfill and the inspeetion and monthly audit

closure of the dump

Improved public health of Cessation of dumping; JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnA

communities in the vicinity Covering and capping off closed sites; the closure of the inspection and monthly audit

of each site due to Where appropriate and affordable, removal of dump until the

eradication/reduction of bulky waste and/or all existing waste and commissioning of ZF

potential disease vectors deposition to ZF landfill once commissioned. landfill

and groundwater impacts

ENVIRONMENTAI. RFsoLRCES MANAGEMEN I METAP/EIBJWORLD BANK

A.8.24

Table 8.4c Enhancement and Monitoring Plan for Closure of Category II Dunp Sites in Jenin Governorate

Responsibility Mitigation Monitoring Monitoring andProject Activity Potential Impact Enhancement Measure for Execution When required Measure & Method Eonborrinaty

for Execution Measure & Method ~~~ResponsibilityElimination of air quality Cessation of dumping; iSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping- visual MEnAimpacts (dust, smoke and Covering and capping oll'closed sites; the closure of the inspection and monthly audit

odour) and visual impacts Where appropriate and al'fordable, removal ol' dump until thefrom cessation of open bulky waste and/or all existing waste and commissioning of ZFdumping deposition to ZF landfill once commissioned. landfill

Improvement in local Cessation of dumping; - ISC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnAproperty and land values Cessation of waste burning; the closure of the inspection and monthly audit

Covering and capping off of closed sites, dump until theWhere appropriate and affordable, removal of commissioning of ZFbulky waste and/or all existing waste and landfilldeposition to ZF landfill once commissioned.

Creation of new habitats Re-instatement of inert soil cover JSC Continuously from Cessation of dumping - visual MEnAand reestablishment of the closure of the inspection and six monthlynative faunal and floral dump until the auditassemblages commissioning of ZF

landfill

I NVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGENMEN r METAT'/1IB/WORLD 11ANK

A.8.25

!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- - - X--NC

X C ;0 0fAk a a t 0 t 44 C

L . _ = I

:~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ , , __

< /,S ~ ~ ~ C /C ,ENC

IL] C~~~~~~~~~~~Q

TN,-N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sT CLAN

Nft N 7144L]t;V>4 ¾' 'Lit A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ON

-4 4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

K- ~K KB K ED ED (E-

|~~~~~~~~~( | (YR/ jgg ,| TN WL

ND E D!, ' , j , .AN | -ECKTRECK RE5S CET .

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~it0

? X . . A : . .R A: NND EK j DEED =S

-5T 12ID 1

ISS8:tO D N 19R0DO3N 9 198^0aD00 S .58)o00 1.Q60.000 . .60801tOF E .70C00900 t PEBR n ND ND D(RVET 4

E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L NR i -FJA

_~~~~~~~~~ 4

I-6 'K ,.MK

KN DE ID/E2TSEEE

/ C ND - _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~GAHI CL

/7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0,

K - DDE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4