wetter g.mattertene ty * * cnet mcint httor

3
1 . * 1 NeoO fiener C.mpo?y ' Sts@n Igo Pt , * , Cn e n.ti, sit 37 Tel It? s R 0ct3 : Fas 217 94444 Wetter G.Mattertene ty * * CNet McInt httor R Y$5"' ' . _ , .. .. ,.., ,. l'ebruery'6;.1908 , I s } I . Docket 4 o. 40 561 1 , , * , Document Control Desk Nuclear Regulatcry Commission Waaldngton, D. C. 20555 Subject: 10CFR21 Report 2197 058: ITT Barton Hydramotor Pressure ReducirutOume Valve W Internal I mk , 1 Deat Madam or Sir: On December 10,1997 ilhnois Power (IP) lnttiated Conditlun Report 107 12165 due to oilleaking around the diaphragm of A replacement prenure reducing / dump valve installed on a GT Barton Hydramotor actuator, The p1 enure reducing / dump valve is part number NS10K9 tti A supplied by ITT Barton. This discovered pnor to declaring the Hyt!rnmotor operable during post maintenance testing of the Hydramotor to determine if the moeinred damper met its required closing time. Hydramotors are und at Clinton Power station tc operate safbty-reined dumpers la vsntilation systems. Two additional preuere reducing / dump valva weie removed from the storeroom and bene.h tested, One of the two additional valves semoved from the storeroom had a leak aimilar to the one that was installed on thillydramotor in the plant, the other valve stiecmfully paned the bench test, Investigation into this condition revealed that the ohnerved problem with the prouure reducing / dump valvo could cause the Hydramotor to einse the damper slower than the design required time. This is contrary to the purchase speciAcation for the Hydramoter wideh speci6es the teriuired damper closing time. This it=2e was identified as potentially reportab!c u the provisions of10 CER, Part 2L ; On the basis that the pressure reducing / dump vald does not mece the i i requirements of the procurement document and that the Identified deficiency with ' pressure reducing / dump valve could cau>e an isolation damper for a safety r ' system to clone slower than assumed in the plant design,IP has concluded tha f is repnttable under the provisions of 10 CFR, Part 21. {g(# | s ! | ' ' '- 9802110143 980206 PDR ADOCK 05000461 S PDR 1 I 1UdU , _.

Upload: others

Post on 17-May-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wetter G.Mattertene ty * * CNet McInt httor

1.

* 1

NeoO fiener C.mpo?y' Sts@n

Igo Pt,

*, Cn e n.ti, sit 37

Tel It? s R 0ct3 :

Fas 217 94444Wetter G.Mattertene ty

* *CNet McInt httor

R Y$5"''

._ , .. .. ,.., ,.

l'ebruery'6;.1908,

Is

} I.

Docket 4 o. 40 5611,

,

*,

Document Control DeskNuclear Regulatcry CommissionWaaldngton, D. C. 20555

Subject: 10CFR21 Report 2197 058: ITT Barton Hydramotor

Pressure ReducirutOume Valve W Internal I mk---

,

1

Deat Madam or Sir:

On December 10,1997 ilhnois Power (IP) lnttiated Conditlun Report107 12165 due to oilleaking around the diaphragm of A replacement prenurereducing / dump valve installed on a GT Barton Hydramotor actuator, The p1 enurereducing / dump valve is part number NS10K9 tti A supplied by ITT Barton. This wasdiscovered pnor to declaring the Hyt!rnmotor operable during post maintenance testingof the Hydramotor to determine if the moeinred damper met its required closing time.Hydramotors are und at Clinton Power station tc operate safbty-reined dumpers lavsntilation systems. Two additional preuere reducing / dump valva weie removed fromthe storeroom and bene.h tested, One of the two additional valves semoved from thestoreroom had a leak aimilar to the one that was installed on thillydramotor in theplant, the other valve stiecmfully paned the bench test, Investigation into thiscondition revealed that the ohnerved problem with the prouure reducing / dump valvocould cause the Hydramotor to einse the damper slower than the design required time.This is contrary to the purchase speciAcation for the Hydramoter wideh speci6es theteriuired damper closing time. This it=2e was identified as potentially reportab!c underthe provisions of10 CER, Part 2L

;

On the basis that the pressure reducing / dump vald does not mece thei

i requirements of the procurement document and that the Identified deficiency with the'

pressure reducing / dump valve could cau>e an isolation damper for a safety related'

system to clone slower than assumed in the plant design,IP has concluded that this juus

fis repnttable under the provisions of 10 CFR, Part 21.

{g(# | s!|'

'

'-9802110143 980206PDR ADOCK 05000461S PDR

1I1UdU ,

_.

Page 2: Wetter G.Mattertene ty * * CNet McInt httor

. _-_ _ ___ _._._ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

- - - . . ..... . . . . . . . . ... ...-, ,

e

|.*'

' , , .-

U.60 m 3! Pas 2

*'

.

.

IP le providing the following information in accordance with 10CFR21.21(d)(4),initial notincetion of this mattw will b3 provided by foreimile of this letter to the NRCOport,tions Centw in accordance with 10CFR21,21(d)(3) within two days of the date the i

!*

roeponsible omeer signs this letter,,

, ,

I (i) Waltw G. MacTuland IV, senior Nuclear Otticer or1P, cfmton Power station, ,

'

Highway .44, 6 Miles Br,st, Clinton, Illinois, 61727, is informing ihe NitclearRegulatory Commluton of a condition report 6ble imder the provisions of 10CFR,

,

i Pan 21.-

' '

1 (ii) The beste component involved 6n this condition is a replacement pressure

reducing / dump valve, part numbw N5108916A, fbr ITT Barton Hydramotors.; ,

i

(iii) The pressure reducing / dump valve were supplied to Clinton Power Station by ITT-

'

Barton, City ofIndustry, California.d

|

(iv) The pressure reducing /domp velve had a leak in the diaphragm area- The couve oft I

the leak appews to be pont machining or workmanship of the valve at the tins of|manufmeture, in eensin applications Hydramotors are required to duso damper in

a specified time. With the identitled danciency in the piessute sedudng/ dump !*

valve the Hydramotor may close slower timi sequhed to mest the time specified bythe purchase speci6 cation. For example, the thilure of a Hydiamotor in theStandby Ou Treatment System to operate in tlw reguls ed time could affect controlroom habitahliity In an accident situation. ;-

',

The cle6elent prennure reducin8 ump valve was identl6ed and detonnined/d(v)j potentially reportable under the provisions of 10CFR21 on Decembw 10,1997,

'

; (vi) There are 103 applications where prenuis isdudus/ dump valves of this model are

in service at Clinton Power Station. IP is not awwe of othw facilitics that could be>

'

jasseted by this de6clency. Finoon pressure mducinst dump valves we jouted in*

I the storeroom. :,

1

- (vil) - The flheen Spare preuure redudng/ dump valves located in'the storeroom (this .

Includes the two that fhiled) will be sent to a vendor to determine if they operate.

properly. The vendor will rework volvn, if poulble, that we detwmined not tooperate properly. When prenuis toducinsMump valve are installed in aHydramotor that have a dnluii required closing timi, Clinton Power Station' '

procedures regulrv that tlwy aic time tuted to ensure they moct the designrequirements. The leak deficier.cy would be identined during time testing.Therefore, no action is being uken for currently installed valves.

(viii) IP has no advice about this issue for other purchasers or licensees.

>

1

1

!' ;.

- .

_ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ . - _ __

Page 3: Wetter G.Mattertene ty * * CNet McInt httor

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

ww" < ~ . - ve.,-~..~ .. ... .....

** *

..,

U+02m.

Page3*

.

. . ..Mditiona1information about this lowe may be obtained by contacting t.. T.*

Chaney, Nuole6r Station Engineering Deputment, at (217) 9354tN1, ertension 3658.|

Sincerdy yours, -

g

gG.h VWalter U. MacFarland,IVChief Nuclear Omcei,

-,

.

M.

.

cc: NRC Clinton Ilconsing Project Manage.r j-

NRC Rwident Oke, %690 *

Regional Mministrator, Region 111, USNRC.

Illinois Department of Nuclear saretyINPO Recoros Center

ASCO (ITT Barton)'

1

.

.

.

It

..

4

. .

,

t

t

o

| <.

_