wfm-final report (1)

17
1 University of Oregon Investment Group December 5, 2014 Consumer Goods Covering Analysts: Phoebe Hsieh [email protected] Key Statistics 52 Week Price Range $36.08-$59.70 50-Day Moving Average $41.66 Estimated Beta 0.98 Dividend Yield 1.27% M arket Capitalization 17.90B 3-Year Revenue CAGR 12.10% Trading Statistics Diluted Shares Outstanding (mm) 378.00 Average Volume (3-Month) (mm) 5.43 Institutional Ownership 86.00% Insider Ownership 1.00% EV/EBITDA (Forward Comps) 14.61 Margins and Ratios Gross M argin (Forward Comps) 35.67% EBITDA M argin (Forward Comps) 6.67% Net M argin (Forward Comps) 1.71% Debt to Enterprise Value 0.00 Investment Thesis Increasing entrants in the organic food industry will create market fragmentation, lower market share, and drive down profits in the long run Despite Whole Foods’ investment in new campaigns and promotions, they will only be effective in retaining customers rather than generating new leads Whole Foods’ newly implemented growth strategy of loyalty rewards (Affinity Program), home delivery and sustainability labeling will elicit strong responses from current customers, but do little to convert competitor customers Increasing price of Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) will drive down margins, making Whole Foods Market more susceptible to shocks in the market Whole Foods Market Ticker: WFM Current Price: $48.19 Recommendation: Sell Price Target: $39.97 Five-Year Stock Chart 0 10000000 20000000 30000000 40000000 50000000 60000000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 11/26/2010 11/26/2011 11/26/2012 11/26/2013 11/26/2014 Adjusted Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Volume

Upload: phoebe-hsieh

Post on 10-Aug-2015

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WFM-Final Report (1)

1

University of Oregon Investment Group

December 5, 2014

Consumer Goods

Covering Analysts: Phoebe Hsieh

[email protected]

Key Statistics

52 Week Price Range $36.08-$59.70

50-Day Moving Average $41.66

Estimated Beta 0.98

Dividend Yield 1.27%

Market Capitalization 17.90B

3-Year Revenue CAGR 12.10%

Trading Statistics

Diluted Shares Outstanding (mm) 378.00

Average Volume (3-Month) (mm) 5.43

Institutional Ownership 86.00%

Insider Ownership 1.00%

EV/EBITDA (Forward Comps) 14.61

Margins and Ratios

Gross Margin (Forward Comps) 35.67%

EBITDA Margin (Forward Comps) 6.67%

Net Margin (Forward Comps) 1.71%

Debt to Enterprise Value 0.00

Investment Thesis

Increasing entrants in the organic food industry will create market

fragmentation, lower market share, and drive down profits in the long run

Despite Whole Foods’ investment in new campaigns and promotions, they

will only be effective in retaining customers rather than generating new

leads

Whole Foods’ newly implemented growth strategy of loyalty rewards

(Affinity Program), home delivery and sustainability labeling will elicit

strong responses from current customers, but do little to convert competitor

customers

Increasing price of Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) will drive down margins,

making Whole Foods Market more susceptible to shocks in the market

Whole Foods Market

Ticker: WFM

Current Price: $48.19

Recommendation: Sell

Price Target: $39.97

Five-Year Stock Chart

0

10000000

20000000

30000000

40000000

50000000

60000000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

11/26/2010 11/26/2011 11/26/2012 11/26/2013 11/26/2014

Adjusted Close 50-Day Avg 200-Day Avg Volume

Page 2: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 2

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Figure 3: Per Capita Fruit and

Vegetable Consumption

Source: IBIS World

615

625

635

645

655

665

2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

Volume

US Canada UK

Figure 2: Whole Foods Market Store Allocation

Source: Whole Foods Market 10-K

Business Overview

Whole Foods Market has been the largest natural and organic food retailer since

going public in January 1992. Originally named SaferWay, Whole Foods’ CEO

John Mackey and Renee Lawson borrowed $45,000 from family and friends in

1978 to open the first “Certified Organic” natural foods store in Austin, Texas.

Their goal was to open an all-natural and organic grocery store that would inspire

customers to eat healthier and become more aware of where their food came from.

In 1984, after merging with another natural grocer, Whole Foods began

expansion by acquiring other natural food chains and building its store base

nationwide. Since acquiring seven Fresh and Wild stores in the United Kingdom

and expanding into Canada, today, Whole Foods has 400 stores, 10 in Canada, 9

in the United Kingdom and 381 throughout the United States.

Natural and Organic Supermarkets Whole Foods is one of a few supermarkets in America to provide only organic

food to its consumers. Although they sell product categories that you can typically

find in a conventional grocery store, their products are organic and marketed to

emphasize its health benefits and quality.

Whole Foods prides itself as a company with higher quality and stronger values

than other grocery stores, differentiating them in a highly competitive market.

They hold themselves to a higher organic standard through employment of

USDA’s Organic Rule policy - supporting healthy ecosystems, humane animal

treatment, and non-GMO foods. As a company with strong morals, they strive to

maximize employee and customer satisfaction through large employee discounts

and team oriented bonus compensations.

Industry

Overview Grocery stores make up a very unique subset of the consumer goods industry.

Supermarkets and grocery stores retail a variety of household good and foods.

Over the past five years, growth has been strong in this industry due to the

strengthening economy and increasing per capita disposable income. Because of

this, many consumers have opted for higher quality, organic foods. This increase

in demand has brought increased revenue for organic grocery stores, but also

increased competition as more companies attempt to penetrate the market. Capital structures vary greatly within this industry, with some companies like

Whole Food Market financed solely through equity and others taking out large

sums of debt. Growth rates also vary between companies as this industry is

innovative and quick to change with consumer habits. Stores become outdated as

new eating habits form, forcing stores to stay current with the industry.

Although advertising is done primarily through word of mouth, some grocery

chain may also employ the use of television advertisement.

Macro factors Per Capital Fruit and Vegetable Consumption:

Per capita fruit and vegetable consumption is predicted to slowly increase over

the next six years. Whole Foods’ new initiative to lower its produce prices in order

to attract a wider customer base coupled with an increasing demand for fruits and

vegetables may spark an uptick in customers for Whole Foods.

Figure 1: Original SaferWay Market

Source: Whole Foods Market Media

Page 3: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 3

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Per Capital Meat Consumption:

Per capita meat consumption is predicted to decline slightly in the short term

before experiencing a slight increase beginning in 2016. With Whole Foods

increasing its meat prices to offset its aggressive cut in produce prices, it will not

be surprising for Whole Foods to see a decline in meat sales in the upcoming

quarters.

Disposable Income/Consumer Spending:

Organic food being considered a luxury item, consumer spending and disposable

income will greatly affect consumers’ ability to afford these expenses. As per

capita disposable income continues to rise into 2020, people may be more inclined

to splurge on their groceries, paying the premium for Whole Foods’ quality

groceries.

Healthy Eating Index:

The healthy eating index is a measure of how much of the USDA’s recommended

diet that the general public consumes. Over the past few decades, the healthy

eating index has been increasing marginally. In the future, the index is shown to

be relatively stable, but with a slight decline going into 2020. Whole foods is a

strongly health conscious company who may be negatively impacted by society’s

stagnant eating habits and face an uphill battle to educate the public.

Competition Competition is very aggressive in the grocery industry and growing rapidly in the

organic food industry. It is the largest issue facing Whole foods and recently seen

to be stunting its growth. As more and more entrants penetrate the Organic food

market and larger grocers stock more aisles with organic food, Whole Foods will

continue to lose more market share.

Price competition is arguably Whole Foods Market’s biggest adversary as their

prices are notoriously high. Although Whole Foods has a strong brand equity and

market share in organic foods, smaller organic food chains are growing rapidly

and fighting for Whole Food’s customers. Smaller organic retailers such as The

Fresh Market, Sprouts, and Trader Joes, which all cater to Whole Foods’ customer

base, market more competitive prices for identical goods.

As big box stores such as Walmart and Kroger also begin to shelf their stores with

increasing amounts of organic goods, these stores are sure to offer a far lower

price than Whole Foods, driving many consumers to these big box retailers for

their grocery and organic food needs.

Much of Whole Food’s future success will be greatly dependent on their ability

to retain their current customers as well as increase their customer base.

Strategic Positioning

Price Cuts In addition to their marketing campaign, Whole Foods is has started testing price

reductions in 5 stores throughout the nation in an effort to evaluate how the market

responds to their lowered prices. In an effort to reduce prices on produce, they are

increasing prices on meat and seafood as well as expanding their corporate “365”

brand in an attempt to offset the cost.

Figure 4: Per Capita Disposable Income

30000

35000

40000

45000

2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

Dollars

Source: IBIS World

Source: IBIS World

KrogerSafeway

Whole Foods Market

The Fresh Market

Figure 5: Competitor Revenue and Growth

Source: Company 10-Ks

Page 4: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 4

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Source: FactSet

Walmart SafewayKroger Supervalue

Walmart 25%

Safeway 8%

Kroger 17%

Super

Value

5%

Other 45%

Figure 8: Grocery Market

Responsibly Grown To educate consumers and emphasize the concept of “responsibly grown”, Whole

Foods is in the beginning stages of a labeling project, which ranks produce and

flowers on a good, better, best scale. These ranks are determined by the

sustainability practices behind each type of produce and reiterate Whole Foods’

passion for the ecosystem and responsible business practices.

Affinity Program In September, Whole Foods began their first ever rewards program. Their goal is

to strengthen customer loyalty and drive new customers to shop at Whole Foods.

Once enrolled, customers will have the choice of using a rewards card or a mobile

app to collect points that can later be converted into rewards such as cooking

classes and discounts. Not only beneficial to consumers, this program will also

allow Whole Foods to begin tracking customer shopping habits, enabling them to

better cater to their customers’ needs.

Apple Pay Among one of the first retailers to accept Apple Pay, Whole Foods hopes to stay

modern and adapt to technological innovation in order to speed up checkouts and

provide customers a fast and easy way to grab their morning coffee or make quick

purchases.

Business Growth Strategies

Sales and Marketing Whole Foods Market has historically claimed itself to be a strong believer in

word-of-mouth marketing, claiming that their quality and values are represented

in their products and customer loyalty. Historically, marketing has only consumed

.4% of their total revenue, but on October 20th Whole Foods launched its first

ever national marketing campaign to encourage consumers to place emphasis on

values and food sustainability.

Whole Foods decided to launch this campaign in an effort to boost their dismal

stock price and falling consumer base in 2013, hoping to gain back market share

and generate consumer awareness. Trying to shed their reputation as “Whole

Paycheck”, they have emphasized the idea that their food is worth the price.

Geographic Currently, Whole Foods Market has not made any plans to expand outside of the

US, Canada, and UK. However, they do have plans to increase their reach in the

US and continue establishing stores throughout Canada. Whole is planning to for

a total of 500 stores by 2017.

Market Share As the demand for organic food continues to increase, Whole Foods hopes to gain

a stronger market share in the grocery industry through store expansions.

However, this is becoming increasingly challenging due to the vast amounts of

entrants into the organic industry as well as market share cannibalization by

conventional grocers who are moving into the organic industry and able to sell

organic products for a fraction of what Whole Foods charges.

Organic Growth Whole Foods Market strives to reach as wide of a consumer base as possible

through organic growth. New store openings have historically been successful and

they strive to replicate their strategy as they move into new areas.

Figure 6: Whole Foods Ad Campaign

Source: Google Images

Page 5: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 5

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Delivery With many national grocery chains providing home delivery to customers, Whole

Foods Market has recently joined the movement through a partnership with

Instacart. Whole Foods hopes to target busy, health conscious shoppers who

would benefit from the convenience of home delivery. This program was piloted

in Boston, Austin, and Portland, with plans for expansion to the rest of the nation

in the near future.

Management and Employee Relations

Whole Foods prides itself as a company with 100% of their employees

independent of unions, as it believes that unions will damage their historically

strong employee relations. Although in the past Whole Foods has been rated

among the best companies to work for, there has been a recent increase in

dissatisfaction among employees in various areas.

John P. Mackey, Co- Founder and Co-CEO John Mackey has been with the CEO of Whole Foods since its inception in 1980.

A strong advocate for free market economics, Mackey has worked hard to create

a company in which no employee is part of a union.

Mackey served as President from 2001-2003 and Chairman of the Board from

1978-2009.

With a passion for philanthropy, Mackey announced in 2006 that he would be

reducing his salary to $1 per year in order to donate his stock portfolio to charity.

Walter Robb, Co-CEO Walter Robb joined the Whole Foods Market team in 1991 where he operated the

Mill Valley store in California. He worked his way up, becoming president of the

Northern Pacific Region in 1993, executive vice President of Operations in 2000,

COO in 2001, and Co-President in 2004. Robb is on various environmental impact

boards around the country and also shares an enthusiasm for organic.

A.C. Gallo, President and Chief Operating Officer A.C. Gallo has been with Whole Foods Market since 1992 when the company he

previously worked for, Bread and Circus, was acquired by Whole Foods. He

worked first as the Northeast region’s vice president and then, in 1996, became

regional president. In 2010, A.C. Gallo began his role as President and COO.

Gallo is very dedicated to sustainable agriculture, taking on the quality standards

initiatives within the company, including animal welfare and sustainable seafood

practices. An advocate of non-GMO foods, Gallo has gone to great lengths in

order to ensure full GMO transparency within the company.

Management Guidance

Management guidance has been strong in the past with regards to giving relatively

accurate guidance to investors. Although they were overly bullish in 2013, leading

to a large decrease in stock price, their estimates have been much more

conservative for 2014.

As their stock price continues to rise, management believes that Whole Foods

Market will continue to grow over the next few years, estimating 500 stores by

2017. Though management has historically done an exceptional job growing

Whole Foods from one store in Austin Texas to now 400 stores in 3 countries,

Source: Google Images

Figure 7: Instacart Logo

Figure 9: Executive Compensation

Source: Company Proxy Statement

Figure 10: Number of Stores

Source: Company 10-K

Page 6: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 6

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

they have been operating predominantly in a niche market with very little direct

competition. Now that there are increasing entrants, management will have to

adapt and change its growth strategy in order to innovate alongside the ever-

changing organic industry.

Portfolio Strategy

Whole Foods Market is a large cap company held in the Svigals’ and Tall Firs

Portfolios. Svigals’ is currently overweight large cap as well as consumer goods

while Tall Firs is underweight large cap and consumer goods. The group

purchased Whole Foods Market at $32.49 per share. Because Whole Foods’

growth and revenue will be slowing down in the future, I believe more value could

be potentially found in a different company, especially for Svigals which is

overweight in both of the categories that Whole Foods is in.

Recent News

“The Unmarketing and Remarketing of Whole Foods”

10/23/2014

In this article, the author, Joe Dobrow, evaluates Whole Foods Market’s new

branding campaign and discusses how it may affect the success of Whole Foods

going forward. Dobrow assesses the implications of “values” as portrayed in the

company’s commercial and discusses how the theme contradicts what Whole

Food says it is trying to do. Whole Foods Market is trying tirelessly to shed its

image as an expensive food retailer by lowering prices, meanwhile airing a

commercial that essentially justifies its high prices as an indicator of value. Whole

Foods’ management, as a result, is sending its customers mixed signals as to

which direction it want to take this company. Also reviewed in this article is John

Mackey’s sudden desire for an ad campaign after vocalizing how much he

believes advertising in media is a waste of money.

“Whole Foods Rolls Out Loyalty Cards”

10/30/2014

This article discusses Whole Foods Market’s new loyalty (Affinity) cards that its

customers have been asking for quite a period of time now. They are testing this

rewards program in their Princeton store and if it proves successful, will begin

implementing it in their other stores nationwide. The loyalty cards are being

offered in hopes of increasing customer loyalty and incentivize new customers to

shop at Whole Foods. The main distinguisher between Whole Foods’ loyalty

program and that of other groceries lies in the fact that the points accumulated

using the Whole Foods loyalty card can be converted into discounts or other

rewards such as free yoga or cooking classes.

Catalysts

Upside Steady increases in disposable income may drive consumers to buy more

expensive, healthier foods.

Figure 12: One Year Stock Prices

Source: Yahoo Finance

Source: Google Images

Figure 11: “Values Matter” Ad Campaign

Page 7: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 7

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Branding campaign may increase customer loyalty and expand the

portion of current customer wallets spent on Whole Foods

Increase in per capita fruit and vegetable consumption will increase sales

in the grocery market

Downside Strained employee relations and increasing desire to unionize among

employees may serve as a detriment to Whole Foods Market’s reputation

and serve as a distraction to team members

Stagnation in the healthy eating index will slow growth and sales in the

organic industry

Oversaturation of the organic food market will make it more difficult for

Whole Foods to maintain their current customer base and attract new

ones

Increasing entrants will drive prices and gross margins down in the

market.

Comparable Analysis

Overview Comparable companies were screened for a variety of different metrics,

specifically focusing on companies with similarities to Whole Foods in terms of

markets, market cap, growth rates, capital structure, margins, and shared risk

factors. Though weighting gross margins are uncommon, I believe it is an

important metric to evaluate because margins are generally small in the grocery

industry compared to others and decreasing gross margins specifically with

regards to organic, can make companies more sensitive to changes in the industry.

Capital structures were taken into account because higher levered companies are

susceptible to different market risks. Growth rates are important to evaluate

because some companies are growing at faster rates than others, indicating the

direction of Whole Foods compared to its competitors and comparable companies.

The Fresh Market (TFM) - 40%

The Fresh Market is a fresh and organic food retailer who operates in the same

market and offers a similar product mix to what is offered by the Whole Foods

Market. They currently operate 129 stores in the United States.

I weighted the Fresh Market 40% because they have very similar product

offerings and the shopping experience is almost identical between The Fresh

Market and Whole Foods Market. Quantitatively, their growth rates and beta are

very similar and their capital structures are well in line. Their gross, EBIT, EBITA

margins, and beta are relatively the same as well, leading me to believe

quantitatively and qualitatively, The Fresh Market is the most comparable to

Whole Foods Market.

Kroger (KR) - 25% Kroger is the largest national supermarket chain and second largest general

retailer in the country. They offer a wide variety of products ranging from produce

to pharmaceuticals in 2,638 supermarkets throughout the United States.

While Kroger’s capital structure is extremely different than Whole Foods, Kroger

also has a large market cap. Kroger also caters towards the same market as Whole

Foods now as Kroger expands their organic and natural food offerings. Although

their growth rates are not as strong as Whole Foods, all of their margins line up

well with Whole Foods. For these reasons, Kroger was given a 25% weighting.

Figure 14: The Fresh Market Logo

Source: Google Images

Figure 15: Kroger Logo

Source: Google Images

Figure 13: Healthy Eating Index

Source: IBIS World

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

Page 8: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 8

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Safeway (SWY) - 25% Safeway is a large player in food and drug retailing throughout the United States.

They offer a wide variety of goods such as floral, seafood, pharmacy and food.

Operating 2,400 stores, Safeway is the second largest supermarket chain in North

America.

Although Safeway’s growth and capital structure is not compatible with Whole

Foods, their market caps are in line and their EBITA’s, Net Incomes, and Capital

Expenditures are extremely similar as well. I believe that it is an important

company to look at when evaluating Whole Foods Market as their margins are

pretty similar and they operate in the same industry. Using Safeway as a

comparable offers the valuation of a traditional grocery store that also includes

fresh organic foods in their offering. Because of these reasons, I have given

Safeway a 25% weighting.

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) - 5% Chipotle Mexican Grill is a restaurant chain with over 1,600 stores in the United

States, United Kingdom, Germany, and France that specializes in personalized

burritos, tacos, and quesadillas.

Chipotle is an interesting comparable because it caters to the same consumer base

as Whole Food - a strongly value centered set of customers who appreciate quality

and humanely raised food. Although Chipotle operates in a different business

segment with much larger margins, their capital structures are very similar and

are both large cap companies. Because of their fundamental differences, I gave

Chipotle a mere 5% weighting.

B&G Foods Inc. (BGS) – 5% B&G Foods is a manufacturer, seller, and distributor of shelf stable foods in the

United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. They market goods such as hot cereals,

chips, and dressings while also offering products via independent brokers and

distributors to supermarket chains, warehouse clubs, and other outlets.

B&G Foods is company who shares very similar gross margins, volatility, and

return on equity. Although B&G Foods operates in a very different industry than

Whole Foods with very different capital structure, some of their products end up

on Whole Foods’ shelves. Those things considered, I gave B&G Foods a 5%

weighting.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Revenue Model Because Whole Foods is in the retail industry, revenue per year for Whole Foods

is calculated based on revenue per square foot and total square footage. For 2014-

2017, management guidance was used to project total stores. Management

previously projected 575 stores through 2018, but later revised that estimate to

500 stores by 2017. Although total square feet is increasing, I projected revenue

per square foot to trend downward due to the increasing competition and Whole

Foods’ potential inability to retain market share and expand their consumer base.

Source: Google Images Source: Google Images

Figure 16: Safeway Logo

Figure 17: Chipotle Logo

Source: Google Images

Figure 18: B&G Foods Logo

Source: Google Images

Page 9: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 9

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Figure 21: Cost of Goods Sold Projections

Source: UOIG Projections

WFM Beta SE Weighting

1 Year Daily 0.75 0.19 0.00%

1 Year Daily Hamada-Comps 0.64 0.00%

3 year daily 1.03 0.08 40.00%

3 year weekly 0.95 0.18 0.00%

3 Year Daily Vasicek- Comps 0.66 5.00%

3 Year Daily Vasicek-ETF 0.62 5.00%

3 Year Daily Hamada 0.59 0.00%

3 Year Daily Hamada- Comps 0.62 5.00%

3 Year Daily Hamada-ETF 0.59 5.00%

3 Year Weekly Hamada 0.45 0.00%

5 year daily 1.07 0.08 40.00%

5 Year Daily Hamada 0.64 0.00%

Whole Foods Market Beta 0.96

Selling General and Administrative Expense Whole Foods Market recently launched its new marketing campaign that is set to

run through 2016. To represent this $20 million expenditure that has never

previously taken place, I projected what their SG&A would be without the ad

campaign and added $10 M to that for 2015 and 2016 to account for their

marketing costs. This expense is projected to trend back down in the future as

management has not discussed plans for any additional branding campaigns in the

future.

Direct Store Expenses Direct Store expenses are comprised of salaries, supplies, and local marketing

efforts. Although these expenses have declined slightly year over year, I

projected them to rise by a small amount during the ad campaign and then trend

back down into the terminal year.

Other Expenses Other expenses consist of Pre-Opening expenses and relocation, store closure, and

lease termination costs. These two line items are projected to increase marginally

when Whole Foods opens more new stores in the next couple of years, as they

will have to spend more money on pre- opening expenses. These expenses involve

training new employees, cost of rent, and construction on new buildings.

Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures are set to increase as Whole Foods expects to open 100 new

stores in the next three years and remodel all stores older than 10 years. I project

that as they begin to decrease the number of store openings in 2018, their capital

expenditures will trend down but remain a little higher than they were historically

as they continue to remodel stores in order to try to keep up with an innovative

market.

Beta Whole Food Market’s beta was calculated using various linear regressions in

comparison with the S&P 500. I also used the Hamada and Vasicek methods to

compare Whole Foods against its comparable companies in order to obtain a

series of betas to evaluate. I placed the most emphasis on my three and five-year

daily betas because of their low standard of error and the five-year reflected a

longer period of time. I took out of consideration betas with standard errors above

0.1 and did not weight my ETF betas because they returned small and negative

numbers.

Cost of Goods Sold Whole Foods’ costs of goods sold are predicted to go up in the future based on

management guidance and as the cost of meat and produce in the industry are

predicted to rise slightly over the years. While cost of goods sold increases each

year on an absolute basis, it will decrease marginally in 2015 as a percentage of

revenue due to Whole Foods’ emphasis on expanding its 365 brand, lessening

shelf space of other brands’ product offerings. Following the 2015 “365” brand

expansion, COGS as a percentage of revenue is estimated to increase slightly and

continue to hover around 63%.

Figure 19: Revenue Projections

Source: UOIG Projections

Source: UOIG Projections

Figure 20: Final Beta

Page 10: WFM-Final Report (1)

UOIG 10

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

Final Implied Price Price Target Weight

DCF $42.11 50.00%

Forward Comparable Analysis $38.68 50.00%

Price Target $40.40

Current Price $48.19

Overvalued (16.17%)

Tax Rate Whole Foods Market’s tax rate is significantly higher than most other companies

at this time but has been slowly decreasing over the past few years. As Whole

Foods management predicts more store openings in Canada, I have projected a

downward trend in tax rate into the terminal year with the assumption that Whole

Foods will be able to take advantage of Canada’s lower tax rate.

Recommendation

Given Whole Food Market’s unfocused direction, increasing competition, and

decreasing margins, a strong overvaluation has been identified in both the DCF

Assumptions and Forward Comparable Analysis. For those reasons, I recommend

a SELL for both the Tall Firs and Svigals’ Portfolios.

Figure 22: Implied Price

Source: UOIG Projections

Page 11: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 11

Comparables Analysis WFM TFM KR SWY CMG BGS

($ in millions)

Whole Foods

Market The Fresh Market Kroger Safeway

Chipotle

Mexican Grill B&G Foods Inc.

Stock Characteristics Max Min Median Weight Avg. 40.00% 25.00% 25.00% 5.00% 5.00%

Current Price 658.56 28.54 39.51 73.30 48.19 39.51 57.71 34.86 658.56 28.54

Beta 1.05 0.21 0.86 0.82 0.98 1.00 0.75 0.70 1.05 0.21

Size

Short-Term Debt 1,657.00 0.00 14.13 512.24 2.00 0.00 1,657.00 386.70 0.00 26.25

Long-Term Debt 9,653.00 0.00 452.30 3,428.33 60.00 0.24 9,653.00 3,891.00 0.00 844.60

Cash and Cash Equivalent 323.00 12.00 29.35 31.54 290.00 12.00 17.00 17.00 323.00 41.70

Non-Controlling Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Preferred Stock 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Diluted Basic Shares 529.00 32.72 155.05 220.14 378.00 48.33 529.00 257.10 32.72 53.00

Market Capitalization 30,122.33 1,512.56 11,330.83 11,555.21 14,105.42 1,900.31 30,122.33 8,556.25 20,996.21 1,512.56

Enterprise Value 41,427.33 1,888.55 13,347.18 15,467.23 13,877.42 1,888.55 41,427.33 12,816.95 20,673.21 2,341.71

Growth Expectations

% Revenue Growth 2015E 15.34% 1.13% 15.34% 46.99% 8.13% 14.26% 4.52% 1.13% 15.34% 3.60%

% Revenue Growth 2016E 14.16% 2.73% 4.61% 35.64% 14.16% 14.14% 4.61% 2.73%

% EBITDA Growth 2015E 18.68% -24.06% 18.68% 21.46% -24.06% 14.81% 5.56% 1.39% 18.68% 5.08%

% EBITDA Growth 2016E 32.34% 5.40% 6.27% 56.91% 32.34% 12.90% 6.27% 5.40%

% EPS Growth 2015E 29.77% 0.00% 14.65% 92.07% 0.00% 14.65% 11.25% 15.97% 20.44% 29.77%

% EPS Growth 2016E 12.78% 0.00% 10.38% 30.81% 0.00% 12.78% 10.38% 7.65%

Profitability Margins

Gross Margin 37.88% 20.72% 26.59% 27.64% 37.88% 34.02% 20.72% 23.66% 26.59% 32.14%

EBIT Margin 21.85% 1.72% 5.84% 5.40% 6.20% 5.84% 2.83% 1.72% 16.76% 21.85%

EBITDA Margin 25.17% 4.33% 10.82% 8.81% 8.89% 10.82% 4.60% 4.33% 19.74% 25.17%

Net Margin 10.17% .63% 4.35% 3.14% 3.56% 4.35% 1.50% 0.63% 10.17% 7.22%

Credit Metrics

Interest Expense 444.00 0.00 41.81 182.85 0.00 3.78 444.00 273.00 0.00 41.81

Debt/EV 0.37 0.00 0.14 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.33 0.00 0.37

Leverage Ratio 4.77 0.00 1.16 1.49 0.05 0.00 2.27 2.74 0.00 4.77

Interest Coverage Ratio 50.00 0.00 5.05 24.46 0.00 50.00 11.23 5.73 0.00 4.36

Operating Results

Revenue 108,497.00 725.00 8,726.50 37,054.40 14,238.00 1,746.00 108,497.00 36,139.00 3,215.00 725.00

Gross Profit 22,482.00 233.00 855.00 8,050.00 5,393.50 594.00 22,482.00 8,550.00 855.00 233.00

EBIT 3,068.00 102.00 579.35 997.66 883.23 102.00 3,068.00 620.00 538.70 158.40

EBITDA 4,986.00 182.50 949.94 1,753.97 1,265.07 189.00 4,986.00 1,564.00 634.80 182.50

Net Income 1,624.00 52.34 278.10 512.67 506.47 76.00 1,624.00 229.20 327.00 52.34

Capital Expenditures 2,828.00 14.65 461.28 953.88 722.65 111.00 2,828.00 767.00 199.90 14.65

Multiples

EV/Revenue 6.43x 0.35x 1.08x 1.10x 0.97x 1.08x 0.38x 0.35x 6.43x 3.23x

EV/Gross Profit 24.18 1.50 3.18 3.82 2.57 3.18 1.84 1.50 24.18 10.05

EV/EBIT 38.38 13.50 18.52 18.61 15.71 18.52 13.50 20.67 38.38 14.78

EV/EBITDA 32.57 8.19 9.99 10.39 10.97 9.99 8.31 8.19 32.57 12.83

EV/(EBITDA-Capex) 47.54 13.95 19.20 21.58 25.58 24.21 19.20 16.08 47.54 13.95

Market Cap/Net Income = P/E 64.21 18.55 28.90 28.63 27.85 25.00 18.55 37.33 64.21 28.90

Multiple Implied Price Weight

EV/Revenue 42.03 20.00%

EV/Gross Profit 55.09 10.00%

EV/EBIT 44.08 0.00%

EV/EBITDA 35.39 70.00%

EV/(EBITDA-Capex) 31.57 0.00%

Market Cap/Net Income = P/E 38.36 0.00%

Price Target $38.68

Current Price $48.19

Overvalued (19.73%)

Appendix 1 – Relative Valuation

Page 12: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 12

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

($ in millions) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 1/19/2014A 4/13/2014A 07/07/2014A 09/29/2014E 2014E 01/31/2015E 04/30/2015E 07/31/2015E 10/31/2015E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E

Total Revenue 8,032.00 9,006.00 10,108.00 11,699.00 12,917.00 4,239.00 3,322.00 3,377.00 3,300.00 14,238.00 3,686.05 3,780.47 3,902.42 4,027.17 15,396.12 17,576.13 19,062.33 20,007.33 20,736.87 21,250.01 21,747.14 22,224.94 22,681.65

% YoY Growth .98% 12.13% 12.24% 15.74% 10.41% 9.93% 9.75% 10.43% 7.91% 10.23% 11.70% 2.56% 3.23% 3.20% 8.13% 14.16% 8.46% 4.96% 3.65% 2.47% 2.34% 2.20% 2.05%

Cost of Goods Sold 5,010.30 5,001.40 4,990.00 4,966.00 4,938.00 2,643.00 2,044.00 2,118.75 2,038.75 8,844.50 2,359.07 2,427.06 2,505.36 2,585.44 9,876.93 11,316.06 12,316.95 12,973.77 13,494.74 13,877.75 14,252.65 14,617.13 14,969.89

% Revenue 62.38% 55.53% 49.37% 42.45% 38.23% 62.35% 61.53% 62.74% 64.00% 62.12% 64.00% 64.20% 64.20% 64.20% 64.15% 64.38% 64.61% 64.85% 65.08% 65.31% 65.54% 65.77% 66.00%

Gross Profit $3,021.70 $4,004.60 $5,118.00 $6,733.00 $7,979.00 $1,596.00 $1,278.00 $1,258.25 $1,261.25 $5,393.50 $1,326.98 $1,353.41 $1,397.07 $1,441.73 $5,519.18 $6,260.07 $6,745.38 $7,033.56 $7,242.13 $7,372.26 $7,494.49 $7,607.82 $7,711.76

Gross Margin 37.62% 44.47% 50.63% 57.55% 61.77% 37.65% 38.47% 37.26% 38.22% 37.88% 36.00% 35.80% 35.80% 35.80% 35.85% 35.62% 35.39% 35.15% 34.92% 34.69% 34.46% 34.23% 34.00%

Selling General and Administrative Expense 244.00 272.00 311.00 372.00 397.00 132.00 107.00 102.00 108.90 449.90 124.13 124.13 124.13 124.13 496.52 566.61 590.93 600.22 622.11 637.50 652.41 666.75 680.45

% Revenue 3.04% 3.02% 3.08% 3.18% 3.07% 3.11% 3.22% 3.02% 3.30% 3.16% 3.37% 3.28% 3.18% 3.08% 3.22% 3.22% 3.10% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

Depreciation and Amortization 266.70 275.60 287.00 311.00 339.00 111.00 87.00 89.57 94.27 381.84 115.64 119.32 122.92 126.80 484.68 578.12 644.31 713.51 777.64 832.07 879.38 920.47 955.96

% Revenue 3.32% 3.06% 2.84% 2.66% 2.62% 2.62% 2.62% 2.65% 2.65% 2.68% 3.14% 3.16% 3.15% 3.15% 3.15% 3.29% 3.38% 3.57% 3.75% 3.92% 4.04% 4.14% 4.21%

% of Net PP&E 14.04% 14.52% 15.22% 15.57% 15.46% 4.57% 3.47% 3.49% 3.55% 13.92% 3.75% 3.75% 3.75% 3.75% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00%

Direct Store Expenses 2,147.00 2,377.00 2,629.00 2,983.00 3,285.00 1,077.00 840.00 849.00 844.80 3,610.80 958.37 982.92 1,014.63 1,018.87 3,974.80 4,321.93 4,453.47 4,428.73 4,335.76 4,182.29 4,013.27 3,828.72 3,629.06

% Revenue 26.73% 26.39% 26.01% 0.25497906 25.43% 25.41% 25.29% 25.14% 25.60% 25.36% 26.00% 26.00% 26.00% 25.30% 25.82% 24.59% 23.36% 22.14% 20.91% 19.68% 18.45% 17.23% 16.00%

Other 80.00 49.00 49.00 57.00 64.00 21.00 13.00 17.23 16.50 67.73 18.43 21.55 23.02 24.16 87.17 100.18 108.66 100.04 103.68 106.25 108.74 111.12 113.41

% Revenue 1.00% .54% .48% .49% .50% .50% .39% .51% .50% .48% .50% .57% .59% .60% .57% .57% .57% .50% .50% .50% .50% .50% .50%

Earnings Before Interest & Taxes $284.00 $1,031.00 $1,842.00 $3,010.00 $3,894.00 $255.00 $231.00 $200.45 $196.78 $883.23 $110.41 $105.49 $112.36 $147.76 $476.02 $693.23 $948.01 $1,191.06 $1,402.95 $1,614.15 $1,840.69 $2,080.76 $2,332.88

% Revenue 3.54% 11.45% 18.22% 25.73% 30.15% 6.02% 6.95% 5.94% 5.96% 6.20% 3.00% 2.79% 2.88% 3.67% 3.09% 3.94% 4.97% 5.95% 6.77% 7.60% 8.46% 9.36% 10.29%

Interest Expense 37.00 33.00 4.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

% Revenue .46% .37% .04% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Investment and Other Income 4.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 11.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 3.30 13.30 3.69 3.40 3.51 2.82 13.42 15.82 17.16 18.01 18.66 19.13 19.57 20.00 20.41

% Revenue .05% .08% .08% .07% .09% .09% .06% .12% .10% .09% .10% .09% .09% .07% .09% .09% .09% .09% .09% .09% .09% .09% .09%

Earnings Before Taxes 251.00 412.00 552.00 752.00 894.00 251.00 229.00 196.45 193.48 869.93 106.72 102.09 108.85 144.94 462.60 677.41 930.85 1,173.06 1,384.29 1,595.03 1,821.12 2,060.76 2,312.47

% Revenue 3.13% 4.57% 5.46% 6.43% 6.92% 5.92% 6.89% 5.82% 6.90% 6.11% 2.90% 2.70% 2.79% 3.60% 3.00% 3.85% 4.88% 5.86% 6.68% 7.51% 8.37% 9.27% 10.20%

Less Taxes (Benefits) 104.00 166.00 209.00 286.00 343.00 101.00 91.00 96.00 75.46 363.46 41.09 38.79 41.25 55.37 176.50 264.19 358.38 445.76 519.11 590.16 692.03 781.03 869.49

Tax Rate 41.43% 40.30% 37.90% 38.10% 38.40% 39.00% 39.00% 39.00% 39.00% 39.00% 38.50% 38.00% 37.90% 38.20% 38.20% 39.00% 38.50% 38.00% 37.50% 37.00% 38.00% 37.90% 37.60%

Net Income $147.00 $246.00 $343.00 $466.00 $551.00 $150.00 $138.00 $100.45 $118.02 $506.47 $65.63 $63.30 $67.59 $89.57 $286.10 $413.22 $572.48 $727.30 $865.18 $1,004.87 $1,129.09 $1,279.73 $1,442.98

Net Margin 1.83% 2.73% 3.39% 3.98% 4.27% 3.54% 4.15% 2.97% 3.58% 3.56% 1.78% 1.67% 1.73% 2.22% 1.86% 2.35% 3.00% 3.64% 4.17% 4.73% 5.19% 5.76% 6.36%

Add Back: Depreciation and Amortization 266.70 275.60 287.00 311.00 339.00 111.00 87.00 89.57 94.27 381.84 115.64 119.32 122.92 126.80 484.68 578.12 644.31 713.51 777.64 832.07 879.38 920.47 955.96

Add Back: Interest Expense*(1-Tax Rate) 21.67 19.70 2.48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Operating Cash Flow $435.37 $541.30 $632.48 $777.00 $890.00 $261.00 $225.00 $190.02 $212.29 $888.31 $181.27 $182.61 $190.52 $216.37 $770.77 $991.34 $1,216.79 $1,440.80 $1,642.81 $1,836.94 $2,008.48 $2,200.20 $2,398.94

% Revenue 5.42% 6.01% 6.26% 6.64% 6.89% 6.16% 6.77% 5.63% 6.43% 6.24% 4.92% 4.83% 4.88% 5.37% 5.01% 5.64% 6.38% 7.20% 7.92% 8.64% 9.24% 9.90% 10.58%

Current Assets 626.00 1,029.00 1,241.00 2,014.00 1,690.00 1,779.00 1,782.00 1,475.00 1,443.25 1,401.84 1,561.83 1,703.72 1,723.36 1,768.78 1,790.43 2,176.85 2,440.38 2,634.29 2,806.44 2,954.38 3,104.36 3,255.74 3,408.08

% Revenue 1.00% 11.43% 12.28% 17.22% 13.08% 41.97% 53.64% 43.68% 43.73% 9.85% 42.37% 45.07% 44.16% 43.92% 11.63% 12.39% 12.80% 13.17% 13.53% 13.90% 14.27% 14.65% 15.03%

Current Liabilities 684.39 747.41 880.47 977.00 1,088.00 1,166.00 1,229.00 1,282.00 1,232.36 1,154.57 1,316.06 1,362.65 1,405.59 1,485.09 1,490.53 1,556.54 1,703.07 1,734.21 1,808.67 1,827.42 1,840.18 1,897.39 1,878.77

% Revenue 8.52% 8.30% 8.71% 8.35% 8.42% 27.51% 37.00% 37.96% 37.34% 8.11% 35.70% 36.04% 36.02% 36.88% 9.68% 8.86% 8.93% 8.67% 8.72% 8.60% 8.46% 8.54% 8.28%

Net Working Capital ($58.39) $281.59 $360.53 $1,037.00 $602.00 $613.00 $553.00 $193.00 $210.89 $247.27 $245.77 $341.07 $317.77 $283.70 $299.90 $620.30 $737.32 $900.08 $997.77 $1,126.96 $1,264.18 $1,358.35 $1,529.31

% Revenue (.73%) 3.13% 3.57% 8.86% 4.66% 14.46% 16.65% 5.72% 6.39% 1.74% 6.67% 9.02% 8.14% 7.04% 1.95% 3.53% 3.87% 4.50% 4.81% 5.30% 5.81% 6.11% 6.74%

Change in Working Capital 415.00 339.98 78.94 676.47 (435.00) 11.00 -60.00 (360.00) 17.89 (354.73) (1.49) 95.30 (23.30) (34.07) 52.64 320.40 117.01 162.77 97.69 129.19 137.22 94.16 170.96

Capital Expenditures 315.00 257.00 365.00 456.00 537.00 219.00 143.00 179.15 181.50 722.65 213.79 215.49 226.34 233.58 889.19 1,019.42 1,105.61 1,141.03 1,140.53 1,147.50 1,153.27 1,157.06 1,134.08

% Revenue 3.92% 2.85% 3.61% 3.90% 4.16% 5.17% 4.30% 5.31% 5.50% 5.08% 5.80% 5.70% 5.80% 5.80% 5.78% 5.80% 5.80% 5.70% 5.50% 5.40% 5.30% 5.21% 5.00%

Acquisitions - 14.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

% Revenue - .16% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Unlevered Free Cash Flow ($294.63) ($70.18) $188.54 ($355.47) $788.00 $31.00 $142.00 $370.87 $12.90 $520.40 ($31.03) ($128.17) ($12.52) $16.87 ($171.06) ($348.48) -$5.84 $137.00 $404.60 $560.24 $717.99 $948.97 $1,093.89

Discounted Free Cash Flow 12.66 (29.86) (121.00) (11.60) 15.32 (293.19) -4.55 98.86 270.36 346.70 411.48 503.66 537.66

EBITDA 550.70 1306.60 2129.00 3321.00 4233.00 366.00 318.00 290.02 291.05 1265.07 226.04 224.81 235.28 274.56 960.70 1271.34 1592.32 1904.57 2180.58 2446.22 2720.08 3001.23 3288.84

EBITDA Margin 6.86% 14.51% 21.06% 28.39% 32.77% 8.63% 9.57% 8.59% 8.82% 8.89% 6.13% 5.95% 6.03% 6.82% 6.24% 7.23% 8.35% 9.52% 10.52% 11.51% 12.51% 13.50% 14.50%

EBITDA Growth 137.26% 62.94% 55.99% 27.46% NA (13.11%) (8.80%) .36% (70.11%) (22.33%) (82.23%) 4.09% 22.13% (24.06%) 32.34% 25.25% 19.61% 14.49% 12.18% 11.20% 10.34% 9.58%

Appendix 2 – Discounted Cash Flows Valuation

Page 13: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 13

Revenue Model Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

($ in Thousands) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 1/19/2014A 4/13/2014A 07/06/2014A 09/29/2014E 2014E 2015E 2015E 2015E 2015E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E

Total Stores 284.00 299.00 311.00 335.00 362.00 372.00 379.00 387.00 400.00 400.00 408.25 416.50 424.75 433.00 433.00 466.00 500.00 520.00 535.00 545.00 555.00 565.00 575.00

% Growth 3.27% 5.28% 4.01% 7.72% 8.06% 8.14% 1.88% 2.11% 3.36% 3.36% 2.06% 2.02% 1.98% 1.94% 8.01% 7.62% 7.30% 4.00% 2.88% 1.87% 1.83% 1.80% 1.77%

Total Square Feet 10,566.00 11,231.00 11,832.00 12,735.00 13,779.00 14,155.00 14,247.00 14,714.44 14,800.00 14,800.00 15,106.76 15,416.66 15,733.04 16,043.44 16,454.00 17,283.40 18,559.26 19,315.14 19,884.23 20,266.03 20,650.27 21,030.75 21,409.40

% Growth 6.73% 6.29% 5.35% 7.63% 8.20% 8.23% .65% 3.28% 3.10% 3.10% 2.07% 2.05% 2.05% 1.97% 8.15% 5.04% 7.38% 4.07% 2.95% 1.92% 1.90% 1.84% 1.80%

Average Square Feet Per Store 37,204.23 37,561.87 38,045.02 38,014.93 38,063.54 38,051.08 37,591.03 38,021.81 37,000.00 37,000.00 37,003.70 37,014.80 37,040.71 37,051.82 37,051.80 37,088.85 37,118.52 37,144.51 37,166.79 37,185.38 37,207.69 37,222.57 37,233.74

% Growth 3.35% .96% 1.29% (.08%) .13% .09% (1.21%) 1.15% (2.69%) (0.03) .01% .03% .07% .03% .14% .10% .08% .07% .06% .05% .06% .04% .03%

Revenue Per Square Foot 760.17 801.89 854.29 918.65 937.44 299.47 233.17 234.13 222.97 989.74 244.00 245.22 248.04 251.02 988.28 1016.94 1027.11 1035.84 1042.88 1048.55 1053.12 1056.78 1059.43

% Growth (5.38%) 5.49% 6.54% 7.53% 2.05% 1.57% (22.14%) .41% 1.00% 5.58% 1.01% .50% 1.15% 1.20% 3.86% 2.90% 1.00% .85% .68% .54% .44% .35% .25%

Stores Opened 15.00 15.00 12.00 24.00 27.00 10.00 7.00 8.00 13.00 38.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 33.00 33.00 33.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00

Total Revenue $8,032,000.00 $9,006,000.00 $10,108,000.00 $11,699,000.00 $12,917,000.00 $4,239,000.00 $3,322,000.00 $3,377,000.00 $3,300,000.00 $14,238,000.00 $3,686,049.57 $3,780,474.51 $3,902,424.26 $4,027,168.24 $15,396,116.57 $17,576,126.36 $19,062,327.40 $20,007,326.80 $20,736,870.23 $21,250,012.12 $21,747,137.99 $22,224,943.81 $22,681,653.86

% Growth .98% 12.13% 12.24% 15.74% 10.41% 9.96% 9.75% 10.43% 7.91% 10.23% 11.70% 2.56% 3.23% 3.20% 8.13% 14.16% 8.46% 4.96% 3.65% 2.47% 2.34% 2.20% 2.05%

Appendix 3 – Revenue Model

Page 14: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 14

Working Capital Model Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

($ in millions) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 1/19/2014A 4/13/2014A 07/07/2014A 09/29/2014E 2014E 2015E 2015E 2015E 2015E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E

Total Revenue 8,032.00 9,006.00 10,108.00 11,699.00 12,917.00 4,239.00 3,322.00 3,377.00 3,300.00 14,238.00 3,686.05 3,780.47 3,902.42 4,027.17 15,396.12 17,576.13 19,062.33 20,007.33 20,736.87 21,250.01 21,747.14 22,224.94 22,681.65

Current Assets

Accounts Receivable 105.00 133.00 175.00 197.00 188.00 209.00 205.00 130.00 161.41 120.00 180.30 191.15 190.88 196.98 196.98 255.21 287.24 301.48 312.47 320.21 327.70 334.90 341.78

Days Sales Outstanding A/R 4.77 5.39 6.32 6.15 5.31 4.54 5.49 3.54 4.50 3.08 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.67 5.30 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50

% of Revenue 1.31% 1.48% 1.73% 1.68% 1.46% 4.93% 6.17% 3.85% 4.89% .84% 4.89% 5.06% 4.89% 4.89% 1.28% 1.45% 1.51% 1.51% 1.51% 1.51% 1.51% 1.51% 1.51%

Merchandise Inventory 311.00 323.00 337.00 374.00 414.00 429.00 443.00 429.00 363.00 363.00 405.47 453.66 468.29 483.26 483.26 604.62 655.74 688.25 713.35 731.00 748.10 764.54 780.25

Days Inventory Outstanding 22.66 23.57 24.65 27.49 30.60 59.25 79.11 73.90 64.99 14.98 62.73 68.22 68.22 68.22 17.86 19.50 19.43 19.36 19.29 19.23 19.16 19.09 19.02

% of Revenue 3.87% 3.59% 3.33% 3.20% 3.21% 10.12% 13.34% 12.70% 11.00% 2.55% 11.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00% 3.14% 3.44% 3.44% 3.44% 3.44% 3.44% 3.44% 3.44% 3.44%

Prepaid Expenses 51.00 55.00 74.00 77.00 93.00 109.00 89.00 109.00 111.00 111.00 95.84 109.63 124.88 108.73 108.73 $105.46 114.37 120.04 124.42 127.50 130.48 133.35 136.09

Days Prepaid Expense Outstanding 76.29 73.81 86.85 75.55 85.50 75.97 74.03 98.31 93.77 90.1 71.03 78.61 92.55 80.59 79.9 67.93 70.65 73.00 73.00 73.00 73.00 73.00 73.00

% of Revenue .63% .61% .73% .66% .72% 2.57% 2.68% 3.23% 3.36% .63% 2.60% 2.90% 3.20% 2.70% .52% .60% .60% .60% .60% .60% .60% .60% .60%

Restricted Cash 71.00 87.00 92.00 103.00 111.00 111.00 109.00 109.00 114.84 114.84 106.16 117.57 119.80 134.10 134.10 158.19 171.56 180.07 186.63 191.25 195.72 200.02 204.13

% of Revenue .88% .97% .91% .88% .86% 2.62% 3.28% 3.23% 3.48% .81% 2.88% 3.11% 3.07% 3.33% .87% .90% .90% .90% .90% .90% .90% .90% .90%

Cost of Goods Sold 88.00 431.00 563.00 1263.00 884.00 921.00 936.00 698.00 693.00 693.00 774.07 831.70 819.51 845.71 867.35 $1,053.37 $1,211.46 $1,344.45 $1,469.57 $1,584.43 $1,702.35 $1,822.93 1945.83

Days COGS Outstanding 6.41 31.45 41.18 92.83 65.34 127.19 167.14 120.25 1121.72 28.60 1209.49 1295.49 1276.49 1317.30 32.05 33.98 35.90 37.82 39.75 41.67 43.60 45.52 47.44

% of Revenue 1.10% 4.79% 5.57% 10.80% 6.84% 21.73% 28.18% 20.67% 21.00% 4.87% 21.00% 22.00% 21.00% 21.00% 5.63% 5.99% 6.36% 6.72% 7.09% 7.46% 7.83% 8.20% 8.58%

Total Current Assets $626.00 $1,029.00 $1,241.00 $2,014.00 $1,690.00 $1,779.00 $1,782.00 $1,475.00 $1,443.25 $1,401.84 $1,561.83 $1,703.72 $1,723.36 $1,768.78 $1,790.43 $2,176.85 $2,440.38 $2,634.29 $2,806.44 $2,954.38 $3,104.36 $3,255.74 $3,408.08

% of Revenue 7.79% 11.43% 12.28% 17.22% 13.08% 41.97% 53.64% 43.68% 43.73% 9.85% 42.37% 45.07% 44.16% 43.92% 11.63% 12.39% 12.80% 13.17% 13.53% 13.90% 14.27% 14.65% 15.03%

Long Term Assets

Net PP&E Beginning 1900.00 1898.00 1886.00 1997.00 2193.00 2428.00 2510.00 2566.00 2655.58 2742.81 3083.61 3181.77 3277.94 3381.36 3488.13 3854.11 4295.41 4756.71 5184.24 5547.13 5862.56 6136.44 6373.04

Capital Expenditures 315.00 257.00 365.00 456.00 537.00 219.00 143.00 179.15 181.50 722.65 213.79 215.49 226.34 233.58 889.19 1019.42 1105.61 1141.03 1140.53 1147.50 1153.27 1157.06 1134.08

Acquisitions 0.00 14.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Depreciation and Amortization 266.70 275.60 287.00 311.00 339.00 111.00 87.00 89.57 94.27 381.84 115.64 119.32 122.92 126.80 523.22 578.12 644.31 713.51 777.64 832.07 879.38 920.47 955.96

Net PP&E Ending 1898.00 1886.00 1997.00 2193.00 2428.00 2510.00 2566.00 2655.58 2742.81 3083.61 3181.77 3277.94 3381.36 3488.13 3854.11 4295.41 4756.71 5184.24 5547.13 5862.56 6136.44 6373.04 6551.16

Total Current Assets & Net PP&E $2,524.00 $2,915.00 $3,238.00 $4,207.00 $4,118.00 $4,289.00 $4,348.00 $4,130.58 $4,186.06 $4,485.45 $4,743.60 $4,981.66 $5,104.72 $5,256.92 $5,644.54 $6,472.26 $7,197.09 $7,818.53 $8,353.57 $8,816.94 $9,240.80 $9,628.78 $9,959.25

% of Revenue 31.42% 32.37% 32.03% 35.96% 31.88% 101.18% 130.89% 122.32% 126.85% 31.50% 128.69% 131.77% 130.81% 130.54% 36.66% 36.82% 37.76% 39.08% 40.28% 41.49% 42.49% 43.32% 43.91%

Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable 190.00 213.00 237.00 247.00 247.00 277.00 271.00 269.00 212.25 212.25 258.53 219.43 219.65 212.50 217.94 257.24 288.20 312.21 333.74 352.47 371.49 390.73 410.13

Days Payable Outstanding 13.84 15.54 17.34 18.15 18.26 38.25 48.39 46.34 38.00 8.76 40.00 33.00 32.00 30.00 8.05 8.30 8.54 8.78 9.03 9.27 9.51 9.76 10.00

% of Revenue 2.37% 2.37% 2.34% 2.11% 1.91% 6.53% 8.16% 7.97% 6.43% 1.49% 7.01% 5.80% 5.63% 5.28% 1.42% 1.46% 1.51% 1.56% 1.61% 1.66% 1.71% 1.76% 1.81%

Accrued Charges 208.00 244.00 282.00 307.00 367.00 384.00 377.00 395.00 396.00 396.00 368.60 453.66 487.80 531.59 531.59 $612.96 671.44 711.74 744.99 770.94 796.70 822.14 847.16

Days Charges Outstanding 15.15 17.81 20.63 22.56 27.13 53.03 67.32 68.05 70.90 16.34 57.03 68.22 71.07 75.05 19.64 19.77 19.90 20.02 20.15 20.28 20.40 20.53 20.66

% of Revenue 2.59% 2.71% 2.79% 2.62% 2.84% 9.06% 11.35% 11.70% 12.00% 2.78% 10.00% 12.00% 12.50% 13.20% 3.45% 3.49% 3.52% 3.56% 3.59% 3.63% 3.66% 3.70% 0.04

Capital Lease Obligations 0.39 0.41 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.31 2.31 2.95 3.02 3.51 3.62 3.62 4.39 5.72 6.00 6.22 7.01 6.52 6.67 6.80

% of Revenue .00% .00% .00% .01% .01% .02% .06% .06% .07% .02% .08% .08% .09% .09% 0.02% .03% .03% .03% .03% .03% .03% .03% .03%

Dividends Payable 8.00 0.00 18.00 26.00 37.00 45.00 45.00 44.00 52.80 52.80 59.35 62.76 67.12 68.86 68.86 $80.85 93.41 100.04 103.68 106.25 108.74 111.12 113.41

% of Revenue .10% 0.00% .18% .22% .29% 1.06% 1.35% 1.30% 1.60% .37% 1.61% 1.66% 1.72% 1.71% .45% .46% .49% .50% .50% .50% .50% .50% .50%

Other Liabilities 278.00 290.00 343.00 396.00 436.00 459.00 534.00 572.00 569.00 491.21 626.63 623.78 627.51 668.51 668.51 $601.10 644.31 604.22 620.03 590.75 556.73 566.74 501.26

% of Revenue 3.46% 3.22% 3.39% 3.38% 3.38% 10.83% 16.07% 16.94% 17.24% 3.45% 17.00% 16.50% 16.08% 16.60% 4.34% 3.42% 3.38% 3.02% 2.99% 2.78% 2.56% 2.55% 2.21%

Total Current Liabilities $684.39 $747.41 $880.47 $977.00 $1,088.00 $1,166.00 $1,229.00 $1,282.00 $1,232.36 $1,154.57 $1,316.06 $1,362.65 $1,405.59 $1,485.09 $1,490.53 $1,556.54 $1,703.07 $1,734.21 $1,808.67 $1,827.42 $1,840.18 $1,897.39 $1,878.77

% of Revenue 8.52% 8.30% 8.71% 8.35% 8.42% 27.51% 37.00% 37.96% 37.34% 8.11% 35.70% 36.04% 36.02% 36.88% 9.68% 8.86% 8.93% 8.67% 8.72% 8.60% 8.46% 8.54% 8.28%

Appendix 4 – Working Capital Model

Page 15: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 15

Discounted Free Cash Flow Assumptions

Tax Rate 37.60% Terminal Growth Rate 3.00%

Risk Free Rate 2.35% Terminal Value 33,530

Beta 0.97 PV of Terminal Value 11,341

Market Risk Premium 5.75% Sum of PV Free Cash Flows 4,577

% Equity 100.00% Firm Value 15,918

% Debt 0.00% Total Debt 0

Cost of Debt 0.00% Cash & Cash Equivalents 290

CAPM 7.90% Market Capitalization 15,918

WACC 7.90% Fully Diluted Shares 378

Implied Price $42.11

Current Price $48.19

Overvalued (12.62%)

Final Implied Price Price Target Weight

DCF $42.11 50.00%

Forward Comparable Analysis $38.68 50.00%

Price Target $40.40

Current Price $48.19

Overvalued (16.17%)

Appendix 5 – Discounted Cash Flows Valuation Assumptions

Page 16: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 16

Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued)

Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate

43 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% (0) 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5%

0.83 46.08 49.70 54.20 59.94 67.52 0.78 7.33% 7.33% 23.09% 46.51% 85.01%

0.93 39.97 42.67 45.94 49.99 55.14 0.88 27.22% 27.22% 49.99% 86.39% 153.87%

1.03 35.04 37.09 39.54 42.50 46.15 0.98 27.22% 27.22% 49.99% 86.39% 153.87%

1.13 30.98 32.58 34.45 36.67 39.34 1.08 7.33% 7.33% 23.09% 46.51% 85.01%

1.23 27.59 28.85 30.31 32.01 34.02 1.18 (20.09%) (20.09%) (11.69%) (0.30%) 15.98%

Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued)

Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate

High growth rate going into terminal year, possibly consider doing an intermediate growth rate 43 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% (0) 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5%

0.07 45.9 45.9 51.8 60.2 73.1 0.07 2.97% 2.97% 17.38% 38.47% 72.33%

0.08 40.5 40.5 45.0 51.2 60.2 0.07 18.78% 18.78% 38.38% 68.76% 122.13%

0.08 36.0 36.0 39.5 44.2 50.8 0.08 18.78% 18.78% 38.38% 68.76% 122.13%

0.09 32.3 32.3 35.1 38.7 43.6 0.08 2.97% 2.97% 17.38% 38.47% 72.33%

0.09 29.1 29.1 31.3 34.2 37.9 0.09 (20.09%) (20.09%) (11.69%) (0.30%) 15.98%

Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued)

Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate

43 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% (0) 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5%

25.75% 2.75 2.75 2.77 2.79 2.81 25.75% -0.94 -0.94 -0.94 -0.94 -0.94

15.75% 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 15.75% -0.98 -0.98 -0.98 -0.98 -0.98

5.75% 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 5.75% -0.98 -0.98 -0.98 -0.98 -0.98

15.75% 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 15.75% -0.99 -0.99 -0.99 -0.99 -0.99

25.75% -0.16 -0.16 -0.16 -0.16 -0.16 25.75% -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00

Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued)

Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate

43 2.2% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% (0) 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5%

0.58 38.31 38.54 42.59 48.08 55.94 0.58 -20.1% -20.1% -11.7% -0.3% 16.0%

0.48 38.31 38.54 42.59 48.08 55.94 0.48 -20.1% -20.1% -11.7% -0.3% 16.0%

0.38 38.31 38.54 42.59 48.08 55.94 0.38 -20.1% -20.1% -11.7% -0.3% 16.0%

0.48 38.31 38.54 42.59 48.08 55.94 0.48 -20.1% -20.1% -11.7% -0.3% 16.0%

0.58 38.31 38.54 42.59 48.08 55.94 0.58 -20.1% -20.1% -11.7% -0.3% 16.0%

Adjusted Beta

WACC

Adjusted Beta

WACC

Market Risk Premium

Tax Rate Tax Rate

Market Risk Premium

Appendix 6 – Sensitivity Analysis

Page 17: WFM-Final Report (1)

December 5, 2014

University of Oregon Investment Group

UOIG 17

Appendix 7 – Sources

BGS Filings

CMG Filings

Courrier Post

Damodoran

Factcoexist.com

FactSet

Google Images

IBIS World

KR Filings

Press Releases

SWY Filings

TFM Filings

WFM Earnings call transcripts

WFM Filings

Yahoo! Finance