… · when species complexes occupy the area being surveyed. the collection of specimens requires...

6
IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 23(1):68–73 • APR 2016 Amphibian and Reptilian Inventories Augmented by Sampling at Heronries Raju Vyas 1 and B. M. Parasharya 2 1 Krishnadeep Tower, Mission Road, Fatehgunj, Vadodara 300 002, Gujarat, India ([email protected]) 2 Agricultural Ornithology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand 388 110, Gujarat, India ([email protected]) Abstract.—An alternate method for supporting amphibian and reptilian inventory was tested. This experimental method involved the collection of regurgitated food from water bird nestlings from a total of 10 heronries: four mixed- species and six single-species heronries in Gujarat State, India, during 1997 to 1999. We verified the presence of twelve species of amphibians, and twelve species of reptiles were recovered intact. Various methods are used to evaluate the diversity of amphibians and reptiles, many of which are resource-dependent in terms of both time and money (e.g., Heyer et al. 1994). The verification process in such diversity surveys generally requires the collection of voucher specimens for establishing the credibility of the work (Dubois and Nemesio 2007; Funk et al. 2005). Vouchers also facilitate further taxonomic studies and the identification of cryptic species, especially when species complexes occupy the area being surveyed. The collection of specimens requires permission from the appropriate government authority. Because relevant authorities in India often are hardcore believers of the philosophy of “Jiv Daya” (a Jainist concept involving compassion for all beings) and unaware of the need for voucher specimens, acquisition of permits to collect in protected areas (sanctuaries and national parks), even for studies of biodiversity and environmental assessments is extremely difficult. Even when permission for voucher collection is granted, strict time constraints are imposed. These render surveys of large areas almost impossible, particularly because vouchers ideally involve a series of specimens of various species (Goodman and Lanyon 1994) and collection methods often are very time consuming. Consequently, methods that are less time-consuming and less expensive are needed. Herein, we test one such alternative. 68 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY Copyright © 2016. Raju Vyas. All rights reserved. WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNAL Materials and Methods We collected amphibians and reptiles from heronries of egrets, herons, and cormorants, using hand-captures supplemented by a technique more commonly employed by ornithologists for obtaining data on the food spectrum of such birds (e.g., Seigfried 1971; Jenni 1973; Kushlan 1978). The diet of many egrets and herons consists of various types of insects, along with fishes, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals (Kushlan 1978; Sodhi 1992; Mathew et al. 1997). Especially during the breeding season, 45% of the diet of these species can comprise amphibians and reptiles (Sodhi and Khera 1984). These birds are widely distributed in many parts of the world, including the Indian Subcontinent, and all are colonial breed- ers. In India, the breeding season more or less coincides with the southwest monsoon (Ali and Ripley 1983), which also is the breeding season of many species of amphibians (Chandra 2002; Das and Dutta 2007) and reptiles (Daniel 2002). Like other herons and egrets, frightened nestlings of Cattle Egrets will regurgitate food stored in the crop and gizzard (Hanebrink and Denton 1969; Jenni 1969). Because this is the least invasive method of studying the food consumed by nestlings (Patel 1996), they were frightened by striking a bam- boo or lightweight aluminum pole against a tree branch while simultaneously shouting or clapping. Nestlings responded by immediately regurgitating a bolus, which was carefully col- lected, stored in a plastic bottle, preserved in a 5–10% formalin solution, labeled, and taken to the laboratory for further study. To test the efficacy of this method for conducting surveys, we made observations and collected boluses during the south- west monsoon (July–September) in 1997, 1998, and 1999 at ten heronries (Fig. 1), four along the margins of protected areas and six in urban areas. Four heronries were mixed-spe- cies and six were single-species heronries (exclusively Cattle Egrets). However, even in the mixed-species heronries, Cattle Egrets were the most abundant species (Table 1) and the only one that is largely a terrestrial feeder (Hancock and Kushlan 1984). Cormorants, herons, and other egrets feed primarily in aquatic habitats (Ali and Ripley 1983). METHODS

Upload: others

Post on 06-Sep-2019

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IRCFREPTILES&AMPHIBIANS•23(1):68–73•APR2016

Amphibian and Reptilian Inventories Augmented by Sampling at Heronries

Raju Vyas1 and B. M. Parasharya2

1KrishnadeepTower,MissionRoad,Fatehgunj,Vadodara300002,Gujarat,India([email protected])2AgriculturalOrnithology,AnandAgriculturalUniversity,Anand388110,Gujarat,India([email protected])

Abstract.—Analternatemethodforsupportingamphibianandreptilianinventorywastested.Thisexperimentalmethodinvolvedthecollectionofregurgitatedfoodfromwaterbirdnestlingsfromatotalof10heronries:fourmixed-speciesandsixsingle-speciesheronriesinGujaratState,India,during1997to1999.Weverifiedthepresenceoftwelvespeciesofamphibians,andtwelvespeciesofreptileswererecoveredintact.

Variousmethodsareusedtoevaluatethediversityofamphibiansandreptiles,manyofwhichareresource-dependentintermsofbothtimeandmoney(e.g.,Heyeretal.1994).Theverificationprocessinsuchdiversitysurveysgenerallyrequiresthecollectionofvoucherspecimensforestablishingthecredibilityofthework(DuboisandNemesio2007;Funketal.2005).Vouchersalsofacilitatefurthertaxonomicstudiesandtheidentificationofcrypticspecies,especiallywhenspeciescomplexesoccupytheareabeingsurveyed.Thecollectionofspecimensrequirespermissionfromtheappropriategovernmentauthority.BecauserelevantauthoritiesinIndiaoftenarehardcorebelieversofthephilosophyof“Jiv Daya”(aJainistconceptinvolvingcompassionforallbeings)andunawareoftheneedforvoucherspecimens,acquisitionofpermitstocollectinprotectedareas(sanctuariesandnationalparks),evenforstudiesofbiodiversityandenvironmentalassessmentsisextremelydifficult.Evenwhenpermissionforvouchercollectionisgranted,stricttimeconstraintsareimposed.Theserendersurveysoflargeareasalmostimpossible,particularlybecausevouchersideallyinvolveaseriesofspecimensofvariousspecies(GoodmanandLanyon1994)andcollectionmethodsoftenareverytimeconsuming.Consequently,methodsthatarelesstime-consumingandlessexpensiveareneeded.Herein,wetestonesuchalternative.

68

IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • VOL15, NO 4 • DEC 2008 189TABLE OF CONTENTS

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

F E A T U R E A R T I C L E S

Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190

The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E S

The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida

.............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212

C O N S E R V A T I O N A L E R T

World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 More Than Mammals ...................................................................................................................................................................... 223 The “Dow Jones Index” of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 225

H U S B A N D R Y

Captive Care of the Central Netted Dragon ....................................................................................................... Shannon Plummer 226

P R O F I L E

Kraig Adler: A Lifetime Promoting Herpetology ................................................................................................ Michael L. Treglia 234

C O M M E N T A R Y

The Turtles Have Been Watching Me ........................................................................................................................ Eric Gangloff 238

B O O K R E V I E W

Threatened Amphibians of the World edited by S.N. Stuart, M. Hoffmann, J.S. Chanson, N.A. Cox, R. Berridge, P. Ramani, and B.E. Young .............................................................................................................. Robert Powell 243

CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 NATURAL HISTORY RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Reports on Natural History ................................. 247 NEWBRIEFS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 248 EDITORIAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 251 FOCUS ON CONSERVATION: A Project You Can Support ............................................................................................... 252

Front Cover. Shannon Plummer.Totat et velleseque audant mo estibus inveliquo velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque moditia erere nonsedis ma sectiatur ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos accullabo.

Back Cover. Michael KernTotat et velleseque audant mo

estibus inveliquo velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus

aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque

moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia-tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as

IRC

F

REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSC O N S E R V AT I O N A N D N AT U R A L H I S T O R Y

Copyright©2016.RajuVyas.Allrightsreserved.

WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNAL

Materials and MethodsWecollectedamphibiansandreptilesfromheronriesofegrets,herons,andcormorants,usinghand-capturessupplementedbyatechniquemorecommonlyemployedbyornithologistsforobtainingdataonthefoodspectrumofsuchbirds(e.g.,Seigfried1971;Jenni1973;Kushlan1978).Thedietofmanyegretsandheronsconsistsofvarioustypesofinsects,alongwithfishes,amphibians,reptiles,andmammals(Kushlan1978;Sodhi1992;Mathewetal.1997).Especiallyduringthebreedingseason,45%ofthedietofthesespeciescancompriseamphibiansandreptiles(SodhiandKhera1984).Thesebirdsarewidelydistributedinmanypartsoftheworld,includingtheIndianSubcontinent,andallarecolonialbreed-ers.InIndia,thebreedingseasonmoreorlesscoincideswiththesouthwestmonsoon(AliandRipley1983),whichalsoisthebreedingseasonofmanyspeciesofamphibians(Chandra2002;DasandDutta2007)andreptiles(Daniel2002). Likeotherheronsandegrets,frightenednestlingsofCattleEgretswill regurgitate foodstoredinthecropandgizzard

(HanebrinkandDenton1969;Jenni1969).Becausethisistheleastinvasivemethodofstudyingthefoodconsumedbynestlings(Patel1996),theywerefrightenedbystrikingabam-booorlightweightaluminumpoleagainstatreebranchwhilesimultaneouslyshoutingorclapping.Nestlingsrespondedbyimmediatelyregurgitatingabolus,whichwascarefullycol-lected,storedinaplasticbottle,preservedina5–10%formalinsolution,labeled,andtakentothelaboratoryforfurtherstudy. Totesttheefficacyofthismethodforconductingsurveys,wemadeobservationsandcollectedbolusesduringthesouth-westmonsoon(July–September)in1997,1998,and1999attenheronries(Fig.1),fouralongthemarginsofprotectedareasandsixinurbanareas.Fourheronriesweremixed-spe-ciesandsixweresingle-speciesheronries(exclusivelyCattleEgrets).However,eveninthemixed-speciesheronries,CattleEgretswerethemostabundantspecies(Table1)andtheonlyonethatislargelyaterrestrialfeeder(HancockandKushlan1984).Cormorants,herons,andotheregretsfeedprimarilyinaquatichabitats(AliandRipley1983).

M E T H O D S

69

ResultsWecollected24speciesofamphibiansandreptiles,including12speciesoffrogsandtoads,onespeciesofturtle,eightspe-ciesoflizards,andthreespeciesofsnakes(Table2).Twelvespecieswere in regurgitated foodboluses, four ofwhich(Microhyla ornata, Euphlyctis hexadactylus, Eutropis carinata, and Eutropis macularia)werefoundinfourormoreheronries,five(Polypedates maculatus, Lygosoma albopunctata, Lygosoma guentheri, Amphiesma stolata, and Xenochrophis piscator)inonlytwoheronries,andthree(Ramanella sp., Lissemys punc-tatahatchlings,andanadultEchis carinata)werelimitedtosmallareaswithinasingleheronry. Thegreatestnumbersofamphibianandreptilianspecieswererecoveredfromlargeandmedium-sizedsingle-speciesheronries atWaghai (20 species) andAhwa (19 species),respectively(Table1).AlthoughbothBharuchandWaghaiarelargeheronries,morespecieswererecoveredfromthesin-gle-speciesheronryatWhagaithanfromthemixed-speciesurbanheronryatBharuch(14).Theleastnumberofspecieswasrecoveredfromasmallsingle-speciesurbanheronryinRajkot(7).

DiscussionFoodhabits ofCattleEgrets are catholic (Hancock andKushlan1984), hence the great diversity of reptiles andamphibians in the diet (Figs. 2& 3).However, CattleEgretsareterrestrialandrarelyfeedinmarshyareas,reduc-ingthelikelihoodoffeedingonpurelyaquaticvertebrates.Consequently, small terrestrialvertebratesdominatetheirdiet.Ontheotherhand,cormorants,herons,andtheotheregrets feedprimarily on aquatic organisms (fishes, occa-sionalamphibiansandaquaticsnakesliketheBuff-stripedKeelback,Amphiesma stolata).With theexceptionof theIndianFlapshellTurtle(Lissemys punctata),fewsmallreptilesoccurinmarshy/shallowwaters.Thispresumablyaccountsfortherelativelylownumberofamphibianandreptilianspe-ciesrecoveredfromtheBharuchheronrywhencomparedtothatatWaghai(mixed-speciesheronryvs.single-speciesher-onry)despitebothbeinglargeinsize. Theamphibianandreptilianspeciesfoundinregurgi-tatedboluseswerecommonandwidelydistributed,exceptRamanellasp.,whichisrestrictedtotheDangForestsouthoftheNarmadaRiverinGujarat(Vyas1998,2008).Incon-

IRCFREPTILES&AMPHIBIANS•23(1):68–73•APR2016VYASANDPARASHARYA

Fig. 1.ThestudyareainGujaratStateshowingthelocationofsurveyedheronries(seealsoTable1).

70

VYASANDPARASHARYA IRCFREPTILES&AMPHIBIANS•23(1):68–73•APR2016

Table 1. HeronriesinGujaratState,India,surveyedduringthisstudy.Largeheronries(>2,000nests);medium(2,000–1,000nests);small(<1,000nests).Birdspecies:IndianPondHeron(Ardeola grayii),CattleEgret(Bubulcus ibis),GreatEgret(Casmerodius albus),LittleEgret(Egretta garzetta),IntermediateEgret(Mesophoyx intermedia),Black-crownedNightHeron(Nycticorax nycticorux),andLittleCormorant(Phalacrocorax niger).

Site Bird Species Size Number Remarks (Year of Survey) of Prey Species Coordinates in Boluses

JunagadhZoo(1997) Bubulcus ibis Medium 14 NearProtectedForest

21°32’31.79”N Egretta garzetta (nowGirnarWildlifeSanctuary)70°27’56.18”E Phalacrocorax niger

Shirvan,Talala(1997) Bubulcus ibis Small 14 SettlementinGirnarWildlifeSanctuary Egretta garzetta

RajkotCity(1997) Bubulcus ibis Small 7 Urbanarea22°16’57.22”N70°49’19.74”E

Bagodara(1997) Bubulcus ibis Medium 13 Urbanarea22°38’17.41”N72°12’05.59”E

Chhatral(1997) Bubulcus ibis Medium 12 Ruralarea23°16’49.51”N72°26’47.74”E

VasnaVillage(1997) Bubulcus ibis Small 11 Ruralarea22°59’02.14”N72°33’36.79”E

Karamsad(1997) Bubulcus ibis Medium 16 Urbanarea22°32’32.93”N Egretta garzetta72°54’20.89”E Phalacrocorax niger

BharuchCity(1997) Ardeola grayii Large 14 Urbanarea21°42’45.53”N Bubulcus ibis73°00’04.28”E Casmerodius albus Egretta garzetta Mesophoyx intermedia Nycticorax nycticorux

Waghai,Dangs(1999) Bubulcus ibis Large 20 NearVansadaNationalPark20°46’27.50”N73°29’46.72”E

Ahwa,Dangs(1999) Bubulcus ibis Medium 19 NearPurnaWildlifeSanctuary20°45’01.17”N73°29’46.72”E

71

IRCFREPTILES&AMPHIBIANS•23(1):68–73•APR2016VYASANDPARASHARYA

trast,thosespeciesfoundonlyinspecificheronrieseitherhadrestricteddistributionsorwerecommonlyencounteredonlyduringthemonsoons. FewoftheIndianstudiesonthedietsofnestlingCattleEgrets(Sodhi1992)orotherwaterbirds(Mukherji1972;Sodhi1985,1986,1989;SodhiandKhera1986)attemptedtoidentifyamphibiansandreptilesatthespecieslevel.Hence,thisisthefirstreportinwhichamphibiansandreptilesrecov-

eredfromregurgitatedfoodbolusesofCattleEgretsandotherwaterbirdsareidentifiedatthatlevel. ConsumptionoftheFlap-shellTurtle(Lissemys punctata)bytheBlack-neckedStork(VyasandThaker2014)andtheLesserAdjutantStork(SivasubramanianandBhupathy1991)iswelldocumented.However,smallerbirdsliketheCattleEgretwerenotknowntofeedontheseturtles,sothisreportrepresentsanewrecord.Similarly,theconsumptionofaven-omousadultSaw-scaledViper(Echis carinata)byaCattleEgret is noteworthy. CattleEgretsusuallybreedduringthesouthwestmon-sooninnorthwesternIndia,withslightdeviationsdepend-ingonlocalconditions(AliandRipley1983;ParasharyaandNaik1990).Consideringasynchronousnestinginagivenheronry(ParasharyaandNaik1990)oranarea(BreedenandBreeden1982),heronriescouldbesampledrepeatedlyoverathree-monthmonsoonperiod.Repeatedsamplingwouldincreasethelikelihoodofencounteringamphibianandreptil-ianspeciesthatarelessabundantorappearonlyunderspe-cificconditions(rain,agriculturaloperations,etc.). Every surveymethod has advantages and disadvan-tages.Limitationsofthissupplementarymethodinclude:(1)Specifichabitatsandmicrohabitatsofamphibianandreptilianspeciescannotbedetermined;(2)chancesofacquiringintactspecimensarereduced;(3)samplingatheronriesispossibleonlyduringthebirds’breedingseasons;and(4)itisusefulonlyforsmallerandmostlyterrestrialspecies.Advantagesare:(1)Itconsumeslesstimeandmoney;(2)itdoesnotrequirepermissiontocollectspecimens(althoughpermissionmight

Fig. 2.AforagingCattleEgret(Bubulcus ibis)withaCommonAsianToad(Duttaphrynus melanostictus).PhotographsbyKartikUpadhyay.

Fig. 3.AforagingCattleEgret(Bubulcus ibis)withajuvenileCheckeredKeelback(Xenochrophis piscator).PhotographbyManojThaker.

72

IRCFREPTILES&AMPHIBIANS•23(1):68–73•APR2016VYASANDPARASHARYA

Table 2. SpeciesofamphibiansandreptilesfoundinregurgitatedfoodbolusesinheronriesinGujaratState,India.Heronries(seealsoTable1):JunagadhZoo(J),Shirvan,Talala(S),RajkotCity(R),Bagodara(B),Chhatral(C),VasnaVillage(V),Karamsad(K),BharuchCity(BC),Waghai,Dangs(W),andAhwa,Dangs(A).Species:CommonAsianToad(Duttaphrynus melanostictus),IndianMarbledToad(Duttaphrynus stomaticus),OrnateNarrow-mouthedFrog(Microhyla ornata),BalloonFrog(Uperodon sp.),MarbledBalloonFrog(Uperodon systoma),IndianSkipperFrog(Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis),IndianGreenFrog(Euphlyctis hexadactylus),IndianBullfrog(Hoplobatrachus tige-rinus),IndianBurrowingFrog(Sphaerotheca breviceps),SouthAsianCricketFrog(Zakeranasp.),CommonIndianTreefrog(Polypedates maculatus),IndianFlapshellTurtle(Lissemys punctata),Brook’sHouseGecko(Hemidactylus c.f.brookii),OrientalGardenLizard(Calotes versicolor),Fan-throatedLizard(Sitana c.f.ponticeriana),White-spottedSuppleSkink(Lygosoma albopunctata),Günther’sWrithingSkink(Lygosoma guentheri),DottedWrithingSkink(Lygosoma punctatus),KeeledIndianMabuya(Eutropis carinata),BronzeMabuya(Eutropis macularia),Buff-stripedKeelback(Amphiesma stolata),CheckeredKeelback(Xenochrophis piscator),andSaw-scaledViper(Echis carinata).

Family Species J S R B C V K BC W A

Frogs (AnurA)

Bufonidae Duttaphrynus melanostictus Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Duttaphrynus stomaticus Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Microhylidae Microhyla ornata Y Y Y Y

Uperodon sp. Y

Uperodon systoma Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Dicroglossidae Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Euphlyctis hexadactylus Y Y Y Y

Hoplobatrachus tigerinus Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Sphaerotheca breviceps Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Zakerana sp. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Zakerana sp. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Rhacophoridae Polypedates maculatus Y Y

TurTles (TesTudines)

Trionychidae Lissemys punctata Y

lizArds (squAmATA)

Gekkonidae Hemidactylus c.f.brookii Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Agamidae Calotes versicolor Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Sitana spinaecephalus Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Sphenomorphidae Lygosoma albopunctata Y Y

Lygosoma guentheri Y Y

Lygosoma punctata Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Mabuyidae Eutropis carinata Y Y Y Y

Eutropis macularia Y Y Y Y Y

snAkes (squAmATA)

Natricidae Amphiesma stolata Y Y

Xenochrophis piscator Y Y

Viperidae Echis carinata Y

73

IRCFREPTILES&AMPHIBIANS•23(1):68–73•APR2016VYASANDPARASHARYA

benecessarytosalvagedeadspecimensinprotectedareas);and(3)itcanprovidetentativedataregardingthepopulationstatus(abundant/rare/presumablyabsent)ofamphibiansandreptileswithinthesampledarea. Todate,wehavetestedthissupplementarysurveytech-niqueonlyinGujaratState,whichhasamoderateamphibianandreptilianspeciesrichness,withover23speciesofamphib-ians(Vyas2005)and114speciesofreptiles(Vyas2007).IftestedelsewhereontheSubcontinent,webelieveitislikelytodetectagreaternumberofspecies.

AcknowledgementsWethanktheForestDepartmentofGujaratforpermissiontoconductresearchinprotectedareas.WealsothankKaritkUpadhyay(Vadodara)forprovidingegretphotographs.RVisthankfultothelateVijayrajJadeja,Curator,SayajiBaugZoo,Vadodaraforsupportandencouragement.BMPisgratefultotheDirectorofResearch,AnandAgriculturalUniversity,Anandforencouragement.

Literature CitedAli,S.andS.D.Ripley.1983.Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan together

with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. OxfordUniversityPress,Delhi,India.

Breeden,S.andB.Breeden.1982.Thedroughtof1979–1980attheKeoladeoGhanaSanctuary,Bharatpur,Rajasthan.Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 79:1–37.

Chandra,S.K.2002.Hand Book. Indian Amphibians.ZoologicalSurveyofIndia,Kolkata.

Daniel,J.C.2002.The Book of Indian Reptiles and Amphibians.BombayNaturalHistorySociety/OxfordUniversityPress,Bombay.

Das,I.andS.K.Dutta.2007.SourcesoflarvalidentitiesforamphibiansofIndia.Hamadryad31:330–358.

Dubois,A.andA.Nemesio.2007.Doesnomenclaturalavailabilityofnominaofnewspeciesorsubspeciesrequirethedepositionofvouchersincollection?Zootaxa 1409:1–22.

Funk,V.A.,P.C.Hoch,L.A.Prather,andW.L.Wanger.2005.Theimportanceofvouchers.Taxon54:127–129.

Goodman,S.M.andS.M.Lanyon.1994.Scientificcollecting.Conservation Biology 8:314–315.

Hancock,J.A.andJ.Kushlan.1984.Herons Handbook.CroomHelm,London.

Hanebrink,E.L.andG.Denton.1969.FeedingbehaviorandanalysisofregurgitatedfoodcollectedfromtheCattleEgretBubulcus ibisandtheLittleBlueHeronFlorida caerulea. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 23:74–79.

Heyer,W.R.,M.A.Donnelly,R.W.McDiarmid,L.C.Hayek,andM.S.Foster.1994.Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. SmithsonianInstitutionPress,Washington,DC.

Jenni,D.A.1969.Astudyoftheecologyoffourspeciesofheronsduringthebreed-ingseasonatLakeAlice,AlachuaCounty,Florida.Ecological Monographs 39:245–270.

Jenni,D.A.1973.RegionalvariationsinthefoodofnestlingCattleEgrets.Auk 90:821–826.

Kushlan,J.A.1978.Feedingecologyofwadingbirds.Wading Birds7:249–297.

Mathew,K.L.,K.V.Pethani,andD.N.Yadav.1997. CattleEgretBubulcus ibisfeed-ingonbabyrats.Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society94:396–397.

Mukherjee,A.K.1972.Food-habitsofwater-birdsoftheSundarban,24-ParganasDistrict,WestBengal,India-III.Egrets.Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society68:691–716.

ParasharyaB.M.andR.M.Naik.1990.CiconiiformbirdsbreedinginBhavnagarCity,Gujarat: A study of their nesting and plea for conservation, pp.429–455.In:J.C.DanielandJ.S.Serrao(eds.),Conservation in Developing Countries: Problems and Prospectus.BombayNaturalHistory Society&OxfordUniversityPress,Bombay,India.

Patel,T.V.1996.NestingecologyandfoodofthenestlingsofCattleEgretBubulcus ibis coromandus (Boddaert).Unpubl.M.S.Thesis,GujaratAgriculturalUniversity,Anand,India.

Seigfried,W.R.1971.ThefoodoftheCattleEgret.Journal of Applied Ecology8:447–468.

Sivasubramanian,C.andS.Bhupathy.1991.IndianFlapshellTurtleLissemys punc-tatainthefoodoftheAdjutantStorkLeptoptilos dubius. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 87:460.

Sodhi,N.S.1985.FoodoftheBlack-crownedNightHeronnestlings.Pavo23:47–52.

Sodhi,N.S.1986.FeedingecologyofIndianPondHeronanditscomparisonwiththatofLittleEgret.Pavo24:97–116.

Sodhi,N.S.1989.MonthlyvariationsindietofCattleEgretBubulcus ibis coroman-dus in and around Chandigarh. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 86:440–443.

Sodhi,N.S.1992.Foodnicherelationshipsoffivesympatricnorth-Indianherons.Forktail 7:125–130.

Sodhi,N.S.andS.Khera.1984.Food,foodrequirementduringgrowthandfeed-ingbehaviorofnestlingBubulcus ibis coromandus(Boddaert).Pavo22:21–29.

Sodhi,N.S.andS.Khera.1986.FeedinghabitsoftheMedianEgret.Research Bulletin of the Punjab University of Science37(1–2):9–12.

Vyas,R.1998.ThereptilesofGujaratstate:Updateddistribution.Tiger Paper 25(1):8–14.

Vyas,R.2005.Vernacularnameof amphibian fauna in the stateofGujarat.Herpinstance3(1):8–9.

Vyas,R.2007.PresentconservationscenarioofreptilefaunainGujaratState,India.The Indian Forester133(10):1381–1394.

Vyas,R.2008.Reviewof thecurrentdiversityandrichnessofamphibiansofGujarat, India. The Indian Forester134(10):1381–1392.

Vyas,R.andM.Thaker.2014.NoteonpredatorsofLissemys punctata(Lacépède,1788).Sauria36:75–78.