why do authoritarian regimes sign the convention against torture? the badass story
DESCRIPTION
Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story. Human Rights Part 1 – The United Nations Human Rights Conventions INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (Course number GOVT 298, Spring 2010) Instructor: James Raymond Vreeland. Plan. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture?
The Badass Story
Human Rights Part 1 –
The United Nations Human Rights Conventions
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
(Course number GOVT 298, Spring 2010)
Instructor: James Raymond Vreeland
1
![Page 2: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plan
• Quick background on HUMAN RIGHTS treaties
• One Puzzle
• Four arguments
• Evidence
2
![Page 3: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Quick background
On United Nations Human Rights Treaties…
3
![Page 4: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Human Rights Conventions
• Principally a legacy of World War II
• 1948: Universal Declaration of Human Rights http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
4
![Page 5: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Core International Human Rights Instrumentshttp://www.unfpa.org/rights/instruments.htm
Treaty Date
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)
1965
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) 1966
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) 1966
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)
1979
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT)
1984
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 1989
International Convention on Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (ICMRW)
1990
5
![Page 6: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
They all have:
– Domestic legal requirements• Enforced domestically…
– International Committees• Can be invited to make reports…
• Only the CAT has
– UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
6
![Page 7: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Universal Jurisdiction:
Torture committed against citizens of country A by citizens of country B while in country C can be prosecuted by country D!!!!!
7
![Page 8: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Definition of torture
• The CAT defines torture as any act inflicted under public authority by which severe pain or suffering (physical or mental) is intentionally inflicted on a person for the purposes of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or discrimination.
8
![Page 9: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Note that “torture” is defined as a state-sanctioned crime
• The CAT is radical:– governments hand over prosecuting authority
to 3rd-parties for state-sanctioned crimes, perhaps committed against a state’s own citizens!
9
![Page 10: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The CAT might have teeth!
• Examples: Pinochet– http://www.allbusiness.com/north-america/united-states-illinois-metro-areas-chicago/1110433-1.html
• The Bush Six– http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2009/04/13/090413ta_talk_mayer
Alberto Gonzales(Attorney General)
David Addington(Cheney Chief of Staff)
John Yoo(DOJ "torture memos")
William Haynes II(Pentagon Lawyer)
Jay Bybee(Asst Attorney Gen)
Douglas Feith(Deputy Defense Secretary)Douglas Feith(Former Gtown Prof)
10
![Page 11: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
http://www.dougfeith.com/#SpanishAffair
• This threat of prosecution challenges the integrity of the U.S. government…
• It claims that U.S. officials can be criminally punished by a foreign court for official work they do for the American people…
• NOTE:
– United States signed CAT 18 April 1988
– United States ratified CAT 21 October 1994
11
![Page 12: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
February 2011: •Human rights groups alleged: Pres. George W. Bush cancelled Swiss trip•Concerned about being held accountable in Geneva for alleged torture in Guantanamo Bay
•Bush Cancels Visit To Switzerland Due To Threat Of Torture Prosecution, Rights Groups Say (2011)•http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/05/bush-switzerland-torture_n_819175.html•http://uruknet.info/?p=m74649&hd=&size=1&l=e
12
![Page 13: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Why sacrifice sovereignty?
• A central question in this class!
• The answer may depend on:
Political Regime
(Democracy vs. Dictatorship)
13
![Page 14: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Puzzle
• The relationship between:
– torture and CAT participation
• Completely different for democracies & dictatorships…
14
![Page 15: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
![Page 16: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
![Page 17: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The Puzzle:
17
![Page 18: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
What’s going on with dictatorships?Four Arguments
• Regional norms
• Political cover
• Domestic institutions
• Leader resolve (badass)
18
![Page 19: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Normative stories
• Governments follow their neighbors
• Norms defined:
• “a standard of appropriate behavior for actors with a given identity” (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998, 891; emphasis added)
• Goodliffe & Hawkins (2006) show a regional identity finding
• But why assume norms? Lots of things trend at the regional level
• And what about the political regime puzzle?
19
![Page 20: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Political cover:• Democracies are easy to explain.
– Treaties become binding domestic law– So you sign iff you already have domestic laws prohibiting torture– You gain international reputation, and you lose nothing
• For dictatorships, treaties do not affect domestic law!
• Dictatorships who torture the most need the most cover
• So they are the most likely to sign/ratify
• CAT has no real meaning for them
• Domestic political institutions controlled by the dictatorship
• But why wouldn’t the non-torturers sign?20
Hathaway
![Page 21: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Domestic Institutions
• My story
• So counter-intuitive,
• It might even be wrong!
21
![Page 22: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
My argument begins with the logic of torture:
• Torture is more likely when power is shared than when power is absolute (Kalyvas 2000, Arendt 1970).
• How do I measure power-sharing?• Some dictatorships allow for
– INDEPENDENT POLITICAL PARTIES (Gandhi 2003).
• Under no-party & one-party states, limitations are obvious.– No ambiguity.
• With multiple political parties, some degree of dissent is endorsed by the state.– Ambiguity. Some people go too far.
• I predict torture to be ironically higher in more liberal dictatorships with multiple political parties.
22
![Page 23: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Will no/one-party states enter into the CAT?
• They are not anti-torture.
• One reason we observe low levels of torture is because of the FEAR of torture.
• They face no pressure from organized alternative political parties to adopt the CAT.
• I predict no/one-party states are less likely to sign/ratify the CAT.
23
![Page 24: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Will multi-party dictatorships enter into the CAT?
• Institutions like multi-parties “encapsulate” parts of society into the regime (O’Donnell 1979, Gandhi and Przeworski 2006).
• Regime faces pressure from organized political parties.
• Policy concessions (Gandhi 2004).– Spend more on education, less on the military
• Entering the CAT is a form of policy concession.
• I predict more liberal dictatorships will be more likely to sign/ratify the CAT.
24
![Page 25: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Evidence
• Compared to one/no-party dictatorships…
• First: – Show that multi-party dictatorships torture???
• Class???• More torture
• Second: – Show that multi-party dictatorships CAT???
• Class???• Sign/Ratify CAT @ higher rates
25
![Page 26: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Dictatorships with parties have higher levels of torture
26
![Page 27: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
To put this plainly:holding other things equal…
• For every 100 observations of dictatorships with no political parties and low levels of torture during a year, one can expect 7 of them to practice high levels of torture the following year (plus or minus 4).
• For every 100 observations of dictatorships with political parties and low levels of torture during a year, one can expect 14 of them to practice high levels of torture the following year (plus or minus 6).
• I conclude that torture is, somewhat counter-intuitively, more prevalent in dictatorships with multiple political parties.
27
![Page 28: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Dictatorships with parties are more likely to sign/ratify the CAT
28
![Page 29: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
0.0
00
.25
0.5
00
.75
1.0
0
0 5 10 15analysis time
party = 0 party = 1
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, by party
Ratifying the CAT
29
![Page 30: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The story explains…• Why governments with more torture enter into the CAT:
– We observe more torture because power is divided (political parties).
– Governments enter the CAT as a concession to the interest groups represented in the political parties.
• Why governments without torture do not enter the CAT:
– There is less torture because there is more fear of torture.
– The last thing these regimes–that rely on fear–want to do is make a gesture that they oppose torture.
– These regimes are not anti-torture, and face no pressure to enter into the CAT.
30
![Page 31: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Leader-resolve story
• Addresses the puzzle that dictatorships with the worst human rights records are the most likely to sign
• Argues that signing “commits” the leader to prison if he relinquishes power
• Commitment is credible because of international enforcement
• Signals to the domestic audience that the leader is a high-resolve type
• May ironically lower torture as the domestic audience realizes it is futile to resist
• Absent resistance, dictatorships need not practice as much torture
• Low-resolve types do not sign because they fear going to prison if they fall from power, which they deem likely
• Why don’t low-resolve types practice as much torture to begin with?
• Could the practice of torture itself act as a signal of resolve?
Badass story
31
![Page 32: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Badass take-away
• The strongest of the dictatorships – the most sure of survival – enter into the CAT
• Keep this in mind for next time
32
![Page 33: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Rosendorff’s broader view:
• International institutions as signals to domestic constituents
• Trade agreements– Used by democracies to signal low-protectionism
• World Bank– Collects data as a credible 3rd party for democracies
to be transparent
• The CAT– Used by dictatorships to signal leader-resolve
33
![Page 34: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Today’s Main Conclusions
• One puzzle:– dictatorships with more torture are more likely to enter the CAT
• Four answers:– 1) Norms, 2) Political cover, 3) Domestic institutions, 4) Leader resolve
• Social science is like a mystery novel– We start with basic core theories
– We encounter puzzles to explain
– We apply the basic core theories to construct a specific argument
– We TEST
• The key to all science is testing! – conjectures and refutations
34
![Page 35: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Thank youWE ARE GLOBAL GEORGETOWN!
35
![Page 36: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Cases of no parties and (dictatorship) low torture
• Burkina Faso under Thomas Sankara (1983 to 1987)• Burundi under the dictatorships of Jean-Baptiste Bagaza (1981–87) and Pierre Buyoya
(1987–1993)• Central African Republic under Andre Kolingba (1981–1993)
• The dictatorship of Paul Biya in Cameroon also experienced low levels of torture from 1985 through 1991, during which period multiple parties were not allowed. When the Biya dictatorship finally did legalize political parties in 1992, rates of torture reached their highest levels.
• Gabon under Omar Bongo, where torture averaged 2.2 according to the Hathaway scale during the closed party period from 1985 to 1989, but averaged 3.1 during the open party period from 1990 to 1996. The pattern, while not as stark, is also found in Mauritania under Moaouya Ould Sidi Ahmed Taya, where torture averaged 2.8 when parties were not allowed from 1985 to 1990, and torture averaged 3.3 when parties were legal.
• Ibrahim Babangida’s dictatorship in Nigeria. Torture levels averaged 2.3 when parties were officially closed (1985–1988), but the average level went up to 4.0 when parties were legalized (1989–1992). The dictatorship of Juvenal Habyarimana in Rwanda had low rates of torture averaging 1.5 from 1985 to 1990 when parties were closed, but the torture rate averaged 3.7 when parties were legal from 1991–1993.
• Cote d’Ivoire, the closed single party dictatorship of Felix Houphouet-Boigny had but a few isolated incidences of torture from 1985 to 1989. In 1990, when Cote d’Ivoire legalized multiple parties, torture became more common, reaching “frequent” levels in 1992, according to the CIRI measure of torture. CIRI also reports that torture in Cote d’Ivoire reached “frequent” levels again in 1995 under Henri Konan Bedie. Interestingly, this is the same year the government signed and ratified the CAT.
36
![Page 37: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Cases of parties and high torture
• Egypt, where multiple parties were legalized under Anwar el-Sadat in 1976. Torture averaged 3.8 from 1985 to 1996, with “common” rates of torture from 1988 to 1994 and “prevalent” torture in 1995.
• Torture rates also reached “prevalent” levels in the open dictatorship of Mexico under Carlos Salinas (in 1991 and 1992) – multiple parties were legal throughout.
• Other examples of high torture rates under multi-party dictatorships include Paraguay (1986) and Georgia (1992–3).
37
![Page 38: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Cases where dictatorships failed to signed the CAT without political parties but did accede after legalizing political parties
• Benin, which legalized political parties in 1990, and then signed and ratified the CAT in 1992;
• Burundi, which legalized political parties in 1992 and then signed and ratified the CAT in 1993;
• Chad, which legalized political parties in 1992 and then signed and ratified the CAT in 1995;
• Ethiopia, which legalized political parties in 1991 and then signed and ratified the CAT in 1994;
• Malawi, which opened political parties in 1993 and signed and ratified the CAT in 1996;
• Nepal, which opened political parties in 1990, signing and ratifying in 1991;
• Chile, which opened political parties the same year as it signed the CAT (1987), ratifying the following year (see Hawkins - raises the interesting possibility of international legitimacy as a further payoff from entering into the CAT)
38
![Page 39: Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? The Badass Story](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/568138f4550346895da0a905/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Further work on norms• Political regime identity?
– Do democracies follow democracy-norms?– Institutionalized dictatorships (multi-party dictatorships) follow
their own norms?– “Pure” dictatorships have their norms?
• We find little evidence of political regime identity at a global level, but strong evidence for democracies and mp dictatorships at the regional level
• But why assume norms? Lots of things trend at the regional level
• Other mechanisms?
39