wto, nama, doha and ita aetic trade acqui 22 september 2008 by hans driessen océ-technologies b.v....

WTO, NAMA, DOHA and ITA

AETIC Trade Acqui 22 September 2008

by Hans Driessen Océ-Technologies B.V. Netherlands

2

Contents

1. WTO Section1.1 Mission

1.2 History

1.3 GATT

1.4 Uruguay Round

1.5 WTO

2. NAMA and NTB’s2.1 What is NAMA

2.2 Definitions Tariff

2.3 Swiss Formula

3. DOHA

4. ITA

3

AETIC Trade Acqui September 2008

“The WTO is the only international organization dealing with the global rules of trade between nations.

Its main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly and freely as possible”

Mission WTOWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

4

Attempt to create an International Trade Organization shortly after WW II (Havana Charter)

Attempt failed, however, 23 countries agreed to reduce tariffs in a “General Agreement on Tariff and Trade” or GATT: 23 founding members, or so called

“Contracting Parties”

GATT signed in 1947 GATT is aiming on reduction of tariff barriers related

to trade in goods only. GATT still is base for all subsequent trade

agreements

History WTOWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


5

Article 1: Most-Favoured-Nation treatment:Conditions applied to the most favoured nation (the one with the least restrictions) apply to all nations. No discriminations between MFN’sMFN in EU

EU: See B. General rules concerning duties1. The customs duties applicable to imported goods originating in countries which are Contracting Parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or with which the European Community has concluded agreements containing the most-favoured-nation tariff clause shall be the conventional duties shown in column 3 of the schedule of duties. Unless the context requires otherwise, these conventional duties are applicable to goods, other than thosereferred to above, imported from any third country.

GATTWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


6

Article VI:

Anti dumping (less than a normal value) and countervailing duties (to compensate export subsidies)

Article VII:

Customs value (in those days “sold or offered for sale”) Article IX:

Marks of origin

GATT - some important articles

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


7

Signatories agreed to further liberalize trade (tariffs) Signatories agreed for special provisions for less

developed countries as well 8 rounds of negotiations completed. During Tokyo round (end seventies) Non Tariff

Measures for first time on agenda Last one was Uruguay round which lasted 87 months At present Doha round is held. Meanwhile also taking

up 80 months (to August 2008) Doha more or less failed in July 2008

GATT follow-upWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


8

Early 80’s economic recessions: Resulting in a system of increased protection through

subsidies on agricultural trade and bilateral market sharing agreements with competing countries

Increased importance of global trade Increased importance of trade in services (no trade

agreements for that in those days) Deteriorating system of trade policy

leading to: Necessity to start a new round: Uruguay Round in 1986

Uruguay RoundWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


9

Completed in 1993 (60 agreements in 550 pages!!) Ambitious program:

Include services Capital Intellectual property Reform Trade in sensitive areas such as Textiles

and Agriculture (price-distorting farm subsidies and quota systems)

Original GATT updated and WTO was established and began as of 1 January 1995 (Marrakesh agreement)



10

Uruguay round also gave a number of deadlines to be completed for pending issues, one of which:

1998: Rules of origin: Work program on harmonization

of rules of origin to be completed (20 July 1998)

This expired already a while ago. The good news: It also led to a swiftly agreed deal for

freer trade in Information Technology that was signed

in December in Singapore during Ministerial Conference, called ITA (Information Technology Agreement)



11

Main activities: Organization for liberalizing Trade (and permitted

exceptions) Forum for Governments to negotiate Trade agreements Body to settle Trade disputes It operates a system of Trade rules

while protect consumers prevent the spread of diseases Possibly leading to trade barriers

WTO WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


12

Focus on three major areas of Trade: Trade in Goods Trade in Services Trade related aspects of IPR (Intellectual Property

Rights) Principle of “National Treatment”, giving others the

same treatment as the national ones. System of gradually introduced changes through

progressive liberalization. Developing countries usually have more time to introduce new agreements.

System promotes predictability, stability and transparency through official publications.



13

WTO nothing more than set of rules. Principles of Trading System:

Without discrimination MFN principle (not discriminate as well between

domestic and foreign products) As freely as possible (also NTB’s included): open, fair

and undistorted Predictable (bound commitments) More competitive More beneficial for Less Developed Countries



14

Decision making process through consensus Top is the Ministerial Conference which meets once

every two years. Below that is the General Council and working groups

reporting to the GC.



15

Questions WTO? WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


16

NAMA: Non-Agriculture Market Access Scope: Simply everything, except Agriculture. Large part of worldwide trade NAMA negotiations successful in Uruguay Round:

some 50% cut in tariffs to the developed countries new tariff bindings (maximum duties or “ceiling level”)

leading to:

Sharply increased predictability for Trade

What is NAMAWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


17

Also referred to as Industrial products or manufactured goods

Major step ahead in Uruguay Round for market access to developed countries

What is NAMAWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


18

Tariffication: Used in Agriculture to convert quotas etc into tariffs so to

have better coverage and more transparency Tariff Peaks:

Relatively high duties on sensitive products: For industrialized countries tariffs of 15% and above

Tariff escalation Higher tariffs on semi finished products and higher on

finished products. Protects domestic processing industries, but discourages the developments thereof

Tariff Binding (or Bound rates) Ceiling level for maximum level for levying duties

Definitions tariffsWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


19

Countervailing duties: Additional duties to counter export subsidies

Anti Dumping duties: Additional duties for products sold at unfairly low prices

(usually lower than sales price in home market)

Definitions tariffsWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


20

As of Tokyo Round formulas as alternative to product cuts

Mathematical Formula to calculate the effect if tariff rates will be cut in Trade negotiations is Swiss formula.

System to harmonize existing high and low tariffs to reach a maximum allowed tariff in a certain period of time (high tariffs are degressively reduced faster than lower tariffs).

Alternative to linear tariff cuttings (fix percentage) proposed by Switzerland during the Tokyo Round.

Reduction in tariffs WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


21

Swiss Formula: Z = AX / (A+X) X = Initial Tariff Rate A = maximum final tariff rate and the coefficient (agreed to

represent the level of tariff cutting) Z = final tariff rate that result.

Example: Coefficient = 30 (final tariff of 30% of existing one) = A Initial tariff: 100 % Z = 30x100 / (30+100) Z = 3000 / 130 = 23% = final tariff rate that results.

or Same cut on an initial tariff of 15% (= A) Z = 30x15 / 45 = 10% = final rate that results.

Swiss FormulaWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


22

Questions NAMA?WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


23

TBTWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

TBT: Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement Aiming on elimination of different regulations,

standards, testing and certification procedures Agreement on code of practice for standards by central

governments, but also local ones Countries should recognize each other’s standards


24

NTBWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Definition: Any measure other than tariff that protects domestic industry through import restrictions.

No official WTO definition exists Most important Non-tariff barriers:

Import licensing Rules for the customs valuation of goods Pre-shipment inspection (Veritas etc.) Rules of origin: made in, where and how to determine? Investment Others


25

NTBWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

How to resolve NTB’s: Identify, categorize and examine NTB’s within negotiation

group. Resolve through bilaterals, on sectoral bases or

multilateral NTB Agreements


26

Ministerial Conference in Doha (Qatar)

launched new negotiations with 21 subjects in November 2001

Known as DDA (Doha Development Agenda) Deadline:

January 2005 missed! New deadline end of 2006 missed! Latest deadline 2008 missed again!

Finally failed during the July session in Geneva 2008 One on the subjects (again): Rules of Origin

Doha roundWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


27

Negotiations in the TNC (Trade Negotiations Committee) Issues:

Implementation of current WTO Agreements (Uruguay) mainly at developing countries

21 subjects in total. For this lecture 2 main ones:

1. February 2002 the Chairman of General Council decided in the first TNC that negotiations on NAMA would take place in a Negotiating Group on Market Access (NGMA) linked to TNC

2. Completing harmonization of NPRoO



28

DOHA Declaration par 16:

“reduce, or as appropriate eliminate tariffs, including the reduction or elimination of tariff peaks, high tariffs, and tariff escalation, as well as non-tariff barriers, in particular on products of export interest to developing countries”

on all non-agriculture products How?

Through mathematical formula (Tokyo round) or product by product (Uruguay Round)?

Decision made to work on “modalities” but missed the deadline of 1 August 2003.

Members agreed on new target date of December 2005

(Ministerial Conference at Hong Kong)

Doha round and NAMAWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


29

DDA General Council decision on 1 Aug 2004

(July package), adopts the framework set out in

Annex B. (called “NAMA Framework”) Framework to determine modalities in Market Access for Non-

Agricultural products Simply put: Which non-agricultural products are in scope? Future work amongst others :

The formula Flexibility for developing countries Non-ad valorum duties shall be converted to ad valorum

(Simply put: what to work on) Reaffirmed again on reducing or eliminating tariffs



30

NAMA Framework reaffirmed at Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration in 2005 in Paragraph 13-24

Status as per July 2008, by Ambassador Don Stephenson*: July 2008 Package to settle range of questions Series of meetings held in Geneva 21-30 July 2008 Scope to be defined

* Don Stephenson: Ambassador of Canada and Chairman of the Negotiating Group on Market Access



31

Scope to define modalities presented on

10 July 2008 (3rd revision): Product coverage: Fish, Oils, Silk, Cotton and the like.

Nothing of chapters High-Tech (already in ITA) Coverage based upon HTS chapters (2002 version)

No High-Tech, no Automotive and the like Of course: there is no High-Tech exports of developing

countries



32

Final text of the NAMA modalities (July 2008) Tariff reductions through “Simple Swiss” Formula with

separate coefficients for developed and developing countries

One option for developed countries, three for developing countries (rule based)

Anti concentration mechanism (preventing entire sectors from tariff cuts)

Overall the approximately 40 members applying the Swiss formula (others have special provisions), account for 90% of NAMA trade

Non-tariff barrier proposals (for many sectors!)



33

Why it failed: Almost agreed on everything except a SSM: Special

Safeguard Mechanism:

The extent to which developing countries would be

able to raise tariffs to protect local farmers from import surges (often caused by export subsidies: unfair competition)



34

Next steps? Elections in the US, elections India, Lost of momentum

will all influence ongoing talks. Developing countries

are suffering most Result: More focus on increased number of bilateral

agreements EU-Korea, EU-Asean, EU-India, EU liberalizing trade

with Japan in non tariff talks US-Korea, US-Malaysia, many many more

Undermining the importance of WTO, critics say.



35

Questions Doha?WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


36

ITA DeclarationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


Agreement made during Ministerial Conference in Singapore 1996, implemented in 1997.

Started with 29 participants, covering 80% of world trade in IT products; now to 70 signatories, covering 97% of world trade

Product coverage specified in 2 annexes: Annex A: HS Headings Annex B: Positive list of specific products

37


18. Taking note that a number of Members have agreed on a Declaration on Trade in Information Technology Products, we welcome the initiative taken by a number of WTO Members and other States or separate customs territories which have applied to accede to the WTO, who have agreed to tariff elimination for trade in information technology products on an MFN basis as well as the addition by a number of Members of over 400 products to their lists of tariff-free products in pharmaceuticals


38



Most important articles (total just 10 articles): Art. 3: Periodic meetings for product review to modify

annexes A and B, due to technological developments Art. 5: Frequent meetings to consider any divergence

among members in classifying IT products.

Participants agree on a common objective of achieving a common classification, based on HS nomenclature

39

The Dispute 2008WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


US and Taiwan and Japan brought case to WTO dispute settlement body.

US is blaming EU to classify IT products incorrectly (in headings out of ITA scope) as well as ignoring technological developments (convergence) by classifying these out of ITA headings

EU argues that US c.s. does not want to negotiate, according ITA agreement and already pushing for months to start reviewing the goods concerned

EU also counters issue that products were not in scope in original Agreement (printers as example)

40

The Dispute 2008WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION


State of Affaires: 60 days consultation period (informal negotiation to

reach consensus) failed WTO forced to take a legally binding decision Outcome difficult to predict Very important issue to follow for IT and CE Industry Also crucial for possible new signatories, such as Brazil,

Mexico or South Africa

41

Questions ITA


WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

wto, nama, doha and ita aetic trade acqui 22 september 2008 by hans driessen océ-technologies b.v....

Documents

trade tariffs

agricultural trade

trade flows

increased importance

ita aetic trade acqui

global rules of trade

international organization

netherlands slide