wu final body
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
1/94
THE IMPACT OF GLOBAL MEDIA ON AMERICAN AND CHINESE
CULTURES:
AN AXIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OFAMERICAS GOT TALENTAND CHINAS
GOT TALENT
SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE
MASTER OF ARTS
BY
JUNLIANG WU
ADVISOR: JAMES W. CHESEBRO
BALL STATE UNIVERSITY
MUNCIE, INDIANA
MAY 2012
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
2/94
2
Table of Content
Title Page 1
Table of Contents 2
List of Tables 3
Acknowledgements 4
Chapter One: Introduction 5
Chapter Two: Literature Review 22
Chapter Three: Methods 41
Chapter Four: Findings 53
Chapter Five: Major Conclusions, Limitations, and Recommendations
for future study 77
Reference 87
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
3/94
3
List of Tables
Table 1.1- Rankings ofAmericas Got TalentFinal Shows 9
Table 1.2- Rankings ofChinas Got TalentSeason Premier and Final 10
Table 2.1- Summary of Connotations of LTO Differences Found in
Surveys and Other Comparative Studies of Values 30
Table 2.2- Eleven American and Chinese cultural values 35
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
4/94
4
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge my appreciation to Dr. James W. Chesebro for his
guidance and confidence towards the completion of this thesis. I am also grateful to Dr.
Maria Williams-Hawkins and Professor Christopher Flook for their constructive criticism
in the writing of this thesis and for helping me to develop this research. I would also like
to thank my family and friends for their constant support and patience.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
5/94
Chapter One: Introduction
If there is one format of television program that would attract millions of people,
the Got Talent reality television show must be one of them. In June 2006, the U.S.A
debuted the talent show in the world-Americas Got Talent, which featured different
kinds of performance from dancers, magicians, comedians, and other performers of all
ages competing for a substantive monetary prize.Americas Got Talentbecame one of
the most popular reality shows in American television industry and this Got Talent
concept started spreading and was accepted by international television audiences. With
such growing influence, China launched the Chinese version of talent contest- Chinas
Got Talentin July 2010. Chinas Got Talentcompletely adapted the same production
format and contest rules fromAmericas Got Talent. It quickly became popular among
young Chinese people and achieved tremendous successes in Chinese television
industries.
Regardless of the originating cultures, this format of talent show intrigues various
audiences across multiple cultures. In other words, a global popular television program
has been discovered, working successfully across American and Chinese cultures.
American and Chinese might have established some sort of common values. Hence, this
thesis focuses on the changing nature of cultural values that are occurring in some nation-
states and that appears to be stimulated and fostered by the global entertainment industry.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
6/94
6
Some specific arguments are central to this position. First, global media programs are
exerting powerful influences on their diverse international audiences. These influences
are increasingly linking into what can be understood and identified as a new international
or global popular culture. Second, as these global media programs have become
international hits, they gradually contribute to the power of the existence and influence of
a global popular culture, a new cultural system that appears fully capable of affecting
nation cultural values. Third, for some individuals in various countries, both national
culture and global popular culture are equally important and simultaneously influencing
individual value. Fourth, at this point in time, we can illustrate that with the impact of
global popular culture, American and Chinese cultural values appear to have more
commonalities. These foundational and common values appear to make two cultures
more understandable and acceptable to Americans and Chinese.
In all, this thesis argues that a dual cultural system, combining national culture
and the global popular culture, is emerging and can exist when individuals are exposed to
the global entertainment industry. These two cultures need to be considered when
assessing international entertainment images for their potential socialization influences.
In other words, we are at the verge of a potentially massive international transformation,
and this transformation--if the entertainment industry is any indication--could potentially
influence the nature of cultural values within the world.
Preview of Chapter One
This chapter is divided into three parts. Part one provides introductions of
Americas Got Talentand Chinas Got Talent, including the formats, performances, and
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
7/94
7
public reflections of those two reality programs. Because the two talent contest television
programs are popular in two different cultures, part two explores various critical
definitions of culture, global culture and popular culture. According to various definitions
of culture, value is the core concept of culture and this study examines culture in an
eclectic approach, especially focusing on axiological perspective. Hence, part three
provides various important definitions of value.
Talent Contests
Television is a significant cultural institution, which may indicate what the culture
is and how it interacts with other cultures. Among all kinds of television programs, the
reality show probably is one of the most popular television genres in most Western and
Eastern societies. Today, almost every country airs local as well as imported reality
shows, or local productions of imported formats (Cohen, J., Weimann, G., and Bar-Sinai,
I. 2009). The common features of reality shows, according to Booker (as cited in Cohen,
J., Weimann, G., and Bar-Sinai, I. 2009), are that they are shows in which producers
create a common theme, structure and frame around a certain topic (e.g., dance, singing,
business), but the events that take place within this structure are new and unpredictable as
they depend on the actions and behaviors of the real people-people who use their real
social identity on television. Most of the time, reality shows attract people by some sort
of competitions that lead to prizes, which could be a desired job, a modeling or recording
contract, and so on. Dauncey (1996) and Wong (2001) explained the reality model could
potentially empower audiences by allowing them to participate directly or from home.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
8/94
8
Talent contests or audition type shows are one format of reality television shows.
The talent show is a revolutionary entertaining programing, which provides a possibility
for audiences to become potential entertainers. Among all talent shows, the Got Talent
series are significant and have spawned over many countries such as America, China,
Canada, and Korea. The following section provides details ofAmericas Got Talentand
Chinas Got Talent.
Americas Got Talent.
Americas Got Talentdebuted in June 2007 and it was the first full series of this
Got TalentTelevision format conceived and owned by Simon Cowell.Americas Got
Talentmaintains the idea of discovering acts or other performances that have never been
seen in the history and these acts and performances provide entertainments to audiences.
The host and judges ofAmericas Got Talentclaim that it provides a platform for
ordinary people who have talent and who want to show off their creative, challenging,
and exciting acts.
The selection processes ofAmericas got talentare divided into four parts:
producers auditions, preliminary auditions, Las Vegas Week (quarterfinals), and finally
live shows. The producers audition is untelevised and held in theaters. This round is held
several months before the judges audition in cities. Following the producers auditions,
contestants will audition in front of three celebrity judges who will select 48 acts to the
next round audition-the Las Vegas week. Despite the traditional stage competition,
Americas Got Talenthas created an online video audition: the YouTube special audition,
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
9/94
9
providing easy access for all talented people in the world. The final live show normally
takes place over two nights: one for final competition and the other one for results.
It might be appropriate to say thatAmericas Got Talenthas adopted and
employed the concept of theAmerican dream, which emphasizes that life should be
better, richer, and fuller for everyone. Interpreting this concept, life should provide
opportunities according to ability or achievement, regardless of social class or
circumstances of birth (Adams, 1931). Hence, this open-call format ofAmericas Got
Talenthas often been a popular one for television industry in the United States, reflected
in the national rankings of American television programs. TheAmericas Got Talenthas
kept millions of TV viewers and was the number one show in fall season since the first
season in 2005. Table 1.1 provides the rankings ofAmericas Got Talent, which identifies
it is the one of the most successful and popular shows in the United States.
Table 1.1 Rankings ofAmericas Got TalentFinal Shows
Season
Season
finale TVSeason
Finale
viewers (inmillions)
Rank
Season
Averageviewers (inmillions)
1 2006 12.05 #1 10
2 2007 13.87 #1 12
3 2008 12.55 #1 11.38
4 2009 15.53 #1 11.91
5 2010 16.41 #1 11.02
Chinas Got Talent.
Chinas Got Talentfirst launched in July 2010 by Dragon TV, a regional satellite
television station in Shanghai. China produced many talent shows before China Got
Talent, and most of them continue to be popular. Super Girl, for example, was one of the
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
10/94
10
most popular talent shows aired on Human Satellite Television Station, the second
biggest television network after China Central Television (CCTV) owned by the Hunan
provincial government from 2004-2006 in China. It was open to any female amateur
contestants regardless of ages and the levels of singing. The previous final seasons of
Super Girlhave drawn more than 400 million viewers (Jacobs, 2011). Similarly, Chinas
Got Talenthas achieved remarkable success through receiving positive feedback from
Chinese audiences. Table 1.2 provides the national rating ofChinas Got Talent, which
suggests Chinas Got Talenthas been extremely popular and caught the publics attention
since it is debuted.
Table 1.2 Rankings ofChinas Got TalentSeason Premier and Final1
SeasonSeasonPremier
Nationalaudience
ratingRank
SeasonFinal
Nationalaudience
ratingRank
1 July 25,2010
1.37 2 Sep 26,2010
5.70 1
2 May 01,2011
2.1 2 July 10,2011
5.947 1
With such positive reactions, Chinas Got Talentis designed to attract a larger
audience and spread more Chinese culture. For instance the third season ofChinas Got
Talentholds auditions in London and Liverpool / Manchester in November (Sun, 2011).
In result, Chinese culture intrigues international audiences and more global elements are
integrated into Chinas Got Talent.
In terms of format and contest rules, Chinas Got Talentcompletely duplicates the
selection process from theAmericas Got Talent. The pre-audition stages are held by
Note: Seasonal rankings are based on average total viewers per episode ofChinas Got Talenton Dragon
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
11/94
11
separate untelevised producers' auditions which come to various provinces across China.
At any time during the audition, the judges may present his/her disapproval to the act by
pressing a buzzer which lights a large red X on the stage. If all the judges press their
buzzers, the act must end immediately. Starting from the semi-finals, the three judges
cannot completely decide who would be able to go to the final stage. The competition
system switches the power to one professional group which consists of 50 representatives
of audiences. Each representative votes for the contestants if they like their acts. The
three judges, in this round, have 10 votes, which largely give their rights to support their
favorite contestants. In the final stage, judges do not have the right to decide who would
be the first-place winner. The final winner is reached by receiving votes from audience
through text messages.
The most popular performances in Chinas Got Talentare singing and dancing.
Contestants regularly decide to show their talents in singing and dancing. Bai Shuping, a
sixty-five-year-old Chinese grandmother, created a viral sensation of Michael Jackson by
showing her Jackson moves. In contrast, Chinese traditional artistic performances are not
salient among the young performers in the contest. Tang Kangmin plays a Chinese
traditional music instrumentKou Xuan () which is a tiny harmonica. She was
recognized well in her first performance, but only achieved sixth place in the final
contest. By observing public reactions to all performances, western acts evidently have
dominated the Chinas Got Talentand convinced Chinese audience to learn and to spread
those acts through the television and the internet.
In all, the two successful Got Talent shows are well-accepted and unbelievably
popular in two American and Chinese cultures. Contestants in Americas Got Talentand
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
12/94
12
Chinas Got Talentact similarly, mostly focusing on dancing and singing. Hence, it may
appropriately claim that this talent format television program is acceptable by American
and Chinese audiences. This phenomenon may also suggest that the global television
programming is affecting American and Chinese cultures by developing and generating
more cultural commonalties. Up to this point, it is essentially to present the importance of
a culture to all individuals, and therefore, part two offers various critical definitions of
culture.
Definitions of Culture
Culture is defined as a combination of human creations with emphasis on
enumeration of content such as histories, traditions, symbols, ideas, values, attitudes, and
behavior. From a wide range perspective, Kluckhohn and Kelly (1945) defined culture as
a complex whole which includes artifacts, beliefs, art, all the other habits acquired by
man as a member of society, and all products of human activity as determined by these
habits (p.82). Herskovits (1948) further stated:
Culture is essentially a construct that describes the total body of belief, behavior,
knowledge, sanction, values, and goals that mark the way of life of any people.
That is, though a culture may be treated by the student as capable of objective
description, in the final analysis it comprises the things that people have, the
things they do, and what they think (p. 625)
In recent studies, vast majority of scholars have agreed that culture is imperative
to determine individual behavior and values. Hall (1976) recognized culture is a word,
which stands for the sum of earned behavior patterns, attitudes, and material things. Kim
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
13/94
13
(1993) focused on the structural and socialization function and he discussed that culture
is significant because it is mostly through culture that human groups organize, direct, and
pattern their behavior. Indeed, culture is a complex system that reflects the complexity of
patterns such as behavior and values and defines how individuals act in various
situations. These wide range definitions provide preliminary evidence that culture sets
regulations for individual behaviors and eventually affecting ones value and cognitive
systems. The advantages of knowing broad definitions are to have a general view of what
culture is and what function it has. However, a precise definition of culture sometimes
provides better understandings and deeper interpretations.
The popular definitions of culture often associated with norms, symbols, and
values. Ting-Toomey and Oetzel (2001) defined culture as a learned meaning system
that consists of patterns of traditions, beliefs, values, norms, and symbols that are passed
on from one generation to the next and are shared to varying degrees by interacting
members of a community (p.9). Kuper (1999) suggested that culture is essentially a
matter of ideas and values, a collective cast of mind. The idea and values, the cosmology,
morality and aesthetics, are expressed in symbols, and so-if the medium is the message-
culture could be described as a symbolic system. Chesebro (2008) further interpreted
culture as imposed to create or replicate a sense of coherence and system, culture is an
integrated pattern of symbol-using reflecting and constructing a system of values,
behaviors, technologies, and social institutions transmitted from one generation to the
next. In this regard, it is appropriate to consider that culture is symbolically constructed
and imposes the symbolic function, passing down our behaviors, values and other
distinctive human characteristics from one generation to the next.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
14/94
14
If a cultural system is constructed by symbols, value is considered as a core
concept of culture. Thomas (1937) once said culture is the material and social values of
any group of people, whether savage or civilized (their institutions, customs, attitude,
behavior reactions) (as cited in Kroeber and Kluckhohn, 1952). In this sense, cultural
value consists of diverse human activities in a group or society and it dominates
communicative methods by determining value systems. Kroeber and Parsons (1958)
cross-disciplinary definition of culture as transmitted and created content and patterns of
values, ideas, and other symbolic-meaningful systems as factors in the shaping of human
behavior and the artifacts produced through behavior (P. 583).
In all, culture is one of the most complex systems in human society. It is a
creation of dynamic contents such as traditions, social interactivities, and influence of
technology. In recent society, the rapid development of digital technologies and the
internet are the two major factors controlling and integrating different cultures.
According to YouTube statistics (2011), over 3 billion videos are viewed a day. Hence,
the internet and global media platform extend individuals ability of getting new
knowledge and exchanging information. Meanwhile, they reduce the feelings of
discomfort, frustration, and irritation and high level of anxiety when encountering people
from other communities or countries. This is the result of cultural globalization.
Accordingly, the next subpart provides definitions of global culture.
Global Culture and Globalization.
Aglobal culture is a cultural mixture which integrates commonality such as
attitude, behavior, and value from numbers of cultures. As countries exchange products
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
15/94
15
and share information, cultural conflicts are being reduced and a global culture is being
constructed. Indeed, culture involves dynamic changes, especially in the world with
technology and the internet. However, people start establishing common attitudes,
behaviors and values by using such advantages. Koning (2009) understood interactivity is
one of the major characteristics of global culture and provided such definition:global
culture is expressed through cosmopolitan consumption practices and tastes, as well as
connection to international social network. Smith (1990) argued that supranationalism is
the greatest function of global culture. He suggestedglobal culture, by definition and
intention, is supranational and is capable of eroding cultural differences between
participants.
Two scholars have elucidated the major characteristics of global culture; others
focus on more precise functions that the wordglobalcan serve. Robertsons (1992), for
instance, has reported the concept ofglobalization focused on an intensified compression
of the world and peoples increasing abundance of global connections and general spread
of global phenomenon. Spybey (1996) argued thatglobalization in its structural
dimensions can be regarded principally as the nation-state system, cultural spreading,
world military order and other internationally dispersed activities.
Among numerous ways of defining globalization, Anthony Giddenss (1990)
definition is probably one of the best known and most comprehensive:
Globalization can thus be defined as the intensification of worldwide social
relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are
shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice verse (p.64).
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
16/94
16
Recognizing the conception and the importance of global culture, a large number
of individuals, especially business merchants, have started creating and adopting global
cultural attitudes for expanding business corporations. Polson (2010), for instance,
discovered that the expansion of capitalist enterprise relies on a force of professionals
employed in sectors such as advertising, accounting, engineering, law, etc., who are bi- or
multi-lingual, willing to live abroad, and able to work in a multicultural team. These
groups of mobile/global elites, who live with cosmopolitan life styles that include
traveling first class or using private air craft, and their identity is not linked to any
specific society, but to membership of managerial circles of the informational economy
across a global cultural spectrum (Castells, 1996).
Given all of these conceptions and examples, it becomes clearer that globalization
could function as an important level of the communication process. Specifically, as this
thesis argues explicitly in chapter 4, this global level of the communication process can
potentially influence individual behavior and eventually change the concept of value.
Adapting from global culture, popular culture is merging and influencing national culture
by allowing people to share social values on multiple platforms.
Popular Culture.
Defining the notion of popular culture is important because this thesis examines
culture and cultural values from two television shows. Storey (2001) defined popular
culture as a simply culture which is widely favored or well liked by many people. In this
sense, popular culture refers to a quantitative index that the majority of people find
acceptable and enjoyable. Bennett and Storey (as cited in Parker, 2011) defined popular
culture in six dimensions 1) quantitatively superior, 2) qualitatively inferior, 3) mass
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
17/94
17
culture, 4) a product of the people, 5) a battlefield for hegemony, or 6) a chimera to
deconstructed by postmodernism by many people.
The power and influence of popular culture in cultural system is profound. It is
playing a crucial role in creating public cultural identities and perceptions of other
cultures and groups. Film serves as a good point to demonstrate the concept of popular
culture that can be well received by global citizens. TakeKung Fu Panda for instance,
the film had received favorable reviews from audiences all over the world. Both films in
the series were well received by Chinese audiences who were impressed with the film's
faithfulness to their cultures. The film topped the box office in its opening weekend,
grossing $60,239,130 for a $14,642 average from 4,114 theaters, which was also the
highest-grossing opening for the DreamWorks film at the time. With the international
success and positive reputation it received, the 3D animationKung Fu Panda 2 was
released on May 26, 2011, which is 3 years after the original one. It has rocked the world
again with a gross of $159,014,430 in the United States and Canada, as of July 10, 2011,
as well as bringing its worldwide total to $563,014,430.
It may now be appropriate to identify the potential power and significance of
global popular cultural systems. In this regard,Facebook, can function as a particularly
vivid and significant example of global popular cultural system. It is known as one of the
biggest social networking platform in contemporary age and has been widely accepted by
most of internet users. Beginning in 2004,Facebookwas a social network that only
works for Harvard students. It quickly encompassed users at most university and college
campuses in the United States. Two-thirds of users log in at least daily and spend an
average of 20 minutes on the site (Freiert, M. 2007). In 2011,Facebookannounced that it
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
18/94
18
has more than 750 million active users with 50% of them log onFacebookin any given
day and 250 million mobile users.Facebookplatform has been built in 190 countries.
There are more than 900 million objects that users are interacting with and the more than
1 billion pieces of content shared every single day.
AlthoughFacebookhas been blocked in China, numbers of internet users have
found ways including special software used to bypass the complex online censorship
system. Bill Bullock (cited from Levin, 2010) the chief executive ofWitopia, a Virginia-
based company that sells a VPN popular among expatriates in China for $60 a year, said
people want theirFacebookand Twitterand they are not going to tolerate a censored
internet. In addition, according to David Gordyansky (cited from Levin, 2010), founder
of the U.S-basedAnchorFree, about one million people in China are using the free VPN
Hotspot Shield, a software that helps users to bypass firewalls and access all content
without censorship, and the numbers of people who start to know how to use these types
of software are increasing.
In all, all of these particulars lead us to one of the key concepts in this thesis, the
word value. With the development of digital technologies, a global popular culture starts
to make an impact on national culture and eventually affect individual values. Therefore,
we should ask: Is the concept ofvalue changing? Is this change international? Are digital
technologies and systems, such as the internet, fostering these transformations throughout
the world? Does global popular culture generate universal values at least in the television
industry? Can Americans and Chinese share similar cultural values? With these questions
in mind, we should consider what we mean by the notion ofvalue.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
19/94
19
Definitions of Value
Kluckhohn acknowledged that the study of values seemed to merge with the study
of culture, and to engage with the same problems (as cited in Powers, 2000, p. 27).
Kluckhohn referred to was many theoretical and methodological problems still required a
better understanding of cultures and values to generate comprehensive answers. This
statement also points out that the study of value has been and will be crucial in the study
of culture. Indeed, as researchers (Kluckhohn, 1951; Hofstede, 2001; Schwartz, 1992)
consider value as the essential concept of culture, the relationship between two concepts
is inseparable. Hofstede (2001) described the manifestation of culture at different levels
by using an onion metaphor. On the outside layer lie symbols (i.e., words, gestures, and
objects), heroes (i.e., iconic representation of the admired in the culture), rituals (i.e.,
collective activities and teachings), and eventually values as the core concept of culture.
Indeed, culture may be defined more than value, yet value is the most important and
foundational part for culture. Schewartz (2006) noted that cultural value shapes and
justifies individual and group beliefs, actions and goals and further argued that studying
value directly is an especially efficient way to capture and characterize cultures (p. 139).
Hence, scholars tend to study cultural values and value orientation in order to understand
the essence of cultures.
Similar to culture, researchers (Kluckhohn, 1967; Hofstede, 2001) attempt to
define values in various ways. Kluckhohn (1967) provided a precise anthropological
definition: A value is a conception, explicit or implicit, distinctive of an individual or
characteristic of a group, of the desirable modes, means and ends of actions (p. 395).
Shearman (2008) probably provides the most comprehensive definition:
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
20/94
20
Values are the beliefs that are held individually or collectively, perceived
consciously or unconsciously, communicated explicitly (verbally/articulately) or
implicitly (symbolically), used as the criteria for cognitive, affective, or
behavioral judgments to guide our choices out of available options, as they
influence society, while society influences them (p.4).
According to Shearman (2008)s definition, a few characteristics and qualities of
value are presented. First, value is something that can be either owned by individuals or
shared by a group of people. This statement could also be understood as values can be
held at different levels: ones that could be shared with someone in the group, others that
held by individuals. Second, value may express explicitly or implicitly. Some Eastern
cultures emphasize implicit messages, nonverbal cues, and symbolic behaviors, while
some Western cultures prefer to send direct message and express ideas by using verbal
cues. Third, values provide evaluative criteria and guide individuals to make decisions.
The values provide us with normative criteria, which deal with what is perceived as
normal, typical, and socially acceptable, and evaluative criteria, which refer to
individuals judgments regarding what is good or bad, what is true and false, and what is
desirable and undesirable (Shearman, 2008, p. 5). Fourth, value has an impact on human
behavior, which are guided by a set of expectations. People desire and want different
things, especially with different values in different cultures. Samover and Porter (2004)
explained: culture strongly influences your beliefs, values, and your worldviews: it is
reflected in your use of language, your nonverbal behavior, and how you relate with
others (p. 3). Fifth, value has impact on individuals, while individuals also affect cultural
values. On the one hand, children learn cultural values through social traditions and
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
21/94
21
heritages. People tend to respect traditions and pass them from one generation to another.
On the other hand, new values would be generated through dynamic social activities.
Summary
This study examines two reality shows,Americas Got Talentand Chinas Got
Talentthat applied similar formats and structures and well accepted by audiences in
American and Chinese cultures. The analysis provides full recognition to the new cultural
system: global popular culture. With the rapid development of global media
programming and digital technology, the global popular culture is exerting powerful
influence on national culture and becoming important to individuals. Meanwhile, cultural
values serve as a core concept of culture. Global popular culture has affected American
and Chinese cultures by generating common values. Chapter two, the literature review,
presents statistical research on the topics of cultural variabilities and the concept of
emerging common values between America and China. In terms of methods of this
thesis, chapter three introduces an eclectic approach of mixing four methods used in this
research and presents the means in which these methods will be used to address the stated
research questions. Chapter four presents results and findings in two talent shows.
Chapter five gives major conclusions and limitations of this study. It also includes some
suggestions for the future study.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
22/94
Chapter Two: Literature Review
Thisthesis dissects the impact of global media on American and Chinese cultures,
mainly focusing on cultural values that are shared by Americans and Chinese. The world
is in a compression process and global media programing connects people from
different nations by establishing similar attitudes, belief, and eventually a set of values.
With such influences, individuals are given plenty of opportunities to know other
cultures. Hence, to effectively and accurately understand the impact of global media on
promoting and transmitting global popular culture and values, this chapter provides
research on the topic of culture and cultural values. Some previous studies directly
present tremendous differences between America and China in a cultural manner. Others
suggest that there are mixed areas between American and Chinese cultures.
Introduction of Chapter Two
The literature review is divided into two major parts. Part one reviews some major
contributions on cultural polarization, especially focusing on Hofstede (2001)s five
major cultural variabilities: power distance, individualism and collectivism, masculinity
and femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and long versus short term orientation. These five
cultural dimensions largely differentiate America and China in terms of cultural values
and social norms. Although cultural differences between America and China are
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
23/94
23
enormous and absolute, the world globalization suggests that America and China have
established and developed commonalities and values in many domestic and international
situations. Accordingly, part two provides definitions of eleven core values and
commonalities found in both American and Chinese cultures.
Cultural Variabilities
America and China offer two study cases that have been frequently discussed and
used to describe the cultural differences between West and East. Indeed, it is common for
people to view American and Chinese cultures as polarized. American tourists are mostly
interested in Chinese historic relics such as the Great Wall, the Forbidden City, and the
Terra Cotta Warriors, whereas Chinese people love to have advanced technologies and
the modern life in the United States. Among all differences, five cultural value
dimensions significantly stand out: power distance, individualism and collectivism,
masculinity and femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term verses short-term
orientation.
Power Distance.
Hofstede (2001) listed the power distance as the first dimension of cultural
difference between America and China. The concept ofpower distance initially was
defined by Dutch social psychologist Mauk Mulder (1977, as cited in Hofstede, 2011)
based on his power distance theory on laboratory and field experiments. He defined
power distance as the degree of inequality in power between a less powerful individual
and a more powerful other, in which individual and other belong to the same (loosely or
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
24/94
24
tightly knit) social system (p. 90). Hofstede (2001) further redefined the concept based on
Mulders definition and suggested thatpower distance is the extent to which the less
powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept
that power is distributed unequally (p.98).
Interpreting Mulder and Hofestedes definitions, it is obvious to see that both
scholars have realized that power distance is associated with social equality and
authority. In this sense, nations differentiate power distance as large power distance and
short power distance. Chesebro (2009) explained in a large-power-distance culture,
people feel dependent on those in authority and expect direction from them, whereas in
short-power-distance culture, people are more willing to challenge or even approach their
bosses. In short-power-distance culture, equalization is one of the most important
elements to be developed. In this sense, short-power distance societies tend to pay less
attention on authorization and more on equality. In contrast, large-power-distance
cultures promote the concept of obedience and tend to pay less attention on equalization
and more attention on authorization. Therefore, children are required to obey parents
teaching and should be dependent on teachers at school.
The power distance values between America and China are significant. China is
one of the large-power-distance cultures. According to Hofstede (2001), the power
distance value of China is at 80, which suggested that the Chinese society believes the
inequalities amongst people are acceptable. In this sense, the relationship between
subordinate and superior tends to be polarized into dependence and counter dependence
(Hofstede, 2001, p. 86). On the other hand, the power distance index value based on
Hofstedes (2001) study repeats that America scored low on this dimension (40), which
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
25/94
25
suggested that Americans pursues liberty and freedom and focus on equal rights in all
aspects of American society and government.
Individualism and Collectivism.
In 1980, Hofstede initially conceptualized individualism-collectivism as a great
dimension representing the cultural difference between West and East. Hofstede (1980)
agreed that Chinese culture is a collectivistic culture, whereas American culture keeps the
individualism as its central value. By definition, individualism is generally defined as a
social pattern that consist of loosely link individuals who view themselves as independent
of collectives and collectivism refers to a social pattern consisting of closely linked
individuals who view themselves as parts of one or more collectives (family, co-workers,
tribe, nation) (Triandis, 1995, p.2). This individualism and collectivism represents the
degree to which individuals are integrated into strong and cohesive groups.
To discover the essences of individualism and collectivism, Kim (1994) employed
statistical analysis and demonstrated six values for individualism: Individuation,
Autonomy, Self-fulfillment, Freedom of choice, Uniqueness, Assertiveness, and six
values for collectivism: Relatedness, Interdependency, Succorance, Nurturance, Common
fate, Compliance. In a similar vein, Oyserman, Coon, and Kemmelmeier (2002) provides
a comprehensive content analysis sorting seven values of individualism: Independence,
Individual goal striving, Competition, Uniqueness, Self-privacy, Self-knowledge, and
Direct communication, and eight important components of collectivism: Relatedness,
Group belonging, Duty, Harmony, Seeking advice from others, Hierarchy, Preference for
group work, Contextualization.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
26/94
26
Driven by a strong sense of collectivism, the individual members of the Chinese
family tend to be more willing to submit their own self-interest to that of the family
(Huang, 2011). In China, it is common to see that a son is asked to inherit his fathers
business, whether he likes or not. The son may lack of knowledge or motivation to run
this family business, but a sense of collectivism, one for all and all for one, always
drives people to sacrifice their individual interests. The Western view of self, in contrast,
is driven by individualism as the main theme for life; it is natural that the West
encourages individuality, independence and autonomy (Huang, 2011). This individualism
is a cultural assumption shared by many Americans. It is very important for an American
to establish his or her independence and self-reliance. Parents raise their children to be
independent to stand on their own two feet (Storti, 1994). All individuals should be
guided by a duty to self and the obligations to do what he or she sees as morally right no
matter what beliefs the others follow.
Masculinity and Femininity.
The third dimension of cultural value is masculinity and femininity, which are
correlated with sexes, genders, and gender roles. Hofstede (2001) used the wordsex when
referring to biological functions andgenderwhen referring to social functions. Men and
women are born with tremendous biological differences. In society, people generally tend
to view men as average, taller, and stronger than women, while women have on average
greater finger dexterity and for example, faster metabolism, which makes them recover
faster from fatigue (Hofstede, 2001, p. 280). Accordingly, these absolute and statistical
biological differences allow women and men to serve different gender roles in society. In
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
27/94
27
this sense, men are supposed to be assertive, competitive and tough; whereas women are
supposed to be more concerned with taking care of the home, the children, and people in
general- to take the tender roles (Hofstede, 2001, p. 280)
After providing the definition of sexes, genders, and gender roles, it is appropriate
to introduce the definition of masculinity and femininity. Hofstede (2001) stated:
Masculinity stands for a society in which social gender roles are clearly distinct:
Men are supposed to be assertive, tough, and focused on material success; women
are supposed to be more modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life.
Femininity stands for a society in which social gender roles overlap: Both men
and women are supposed to be modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of
life (p.297).
With the definitions of masculinity and femininity in mind, Chetwynd & Hartnett
(1978) noticed that the sex-role system is at the core of our cultural norms (p. 3). The
differences between masculine culture and feminine culture are depending on several key
values such as achievements and competitions. Chesebro (2009) claimed that a masculine
culture is tough, exhibiting aggressiveness, decisiveness, and competitiveness, and it
places greater value on achievement outside of the home, power, grandeur, and well-
defined gender roles. Chesebro (2009) further discussed that a feminine culture is tender,
exhibiting modesty, reticence, caring for others and concern for a favorable environment,
and it places greater value on nurturing, harmony, and interchangeable gender roles,
settle conflict by negotiation and compromise, and is relationship oriented.
In the category of masculine and feminine cultures, America and China are both
masculine societies. In this view, winning competition and receiving achievements and
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
28/94
28
recognitions are significant in both cultures. Americans are willing to take challenges and
competitions in order to achieve success and become the best in the field. Americans
understand that everyone could be the best by hard work. Hence, during the competition,
they may ignore other important matters such as relationships. Similarly, Chinese people
would sacrifice family and leisure priorities for work. The Beijing Olympic Games, for
instance, was created by millions of people sacrificing family times and health for one
purpose: to present the best Olympic games in history.
Uncertainty Avoidance.
The fourth dimension of cultural value has been labeled as uncertainty avoidance.
The notion of uncertainty avoidance is largely associated with controllability and
predictability. Hofstede (2001) defined uncertainty avoidance as the extent to which the
members of a culture feel threatened by uncertain or unknown situations (p.161).
Chesebro (2009) suggested the low uncertainty avoidance culture is associated with a
preference for unstructured environments, more tolerant of experimentation and deviant
ideas, while members of high uncertainty avoidance cultures prefer structured situations,
conformity to formal rules and established norms, tend to have higher levels of anxiety,
often manifested in greater emotional expression and aggressiveness; and, they find it
difficult to relax.
According to Hofstedes (2001) empirical study, America and China belong to
two different categories. The American society is a low uncertainty avoidance culture.
Americans have cultivated a large degree of acceptance creative ideas, innovative
products, and are willing to try new and different activities, whether the future is
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
29/94
29
predictable or not. Meanwhile, the low uncertainty avoidance affects education systems
in which the teaching process is determined. At school, teachers encourage students to
express original and creative ideas, no matter good or bad. Consequently, the United
States is one of the countries that won the most Nobel Prize recognition in academic
fields.
On the other hand, China is a high uncertainty avoidance culture. The old Chinese
saying Ju An Si Wei(), which urges everyone to be prepared for danger in
times of safety and to be vigilant in times of peace, reflects a tradition of Chinese people
not accustomed unstructured environments and unpredictable situations. Television
stations in China, for instance, are state owned. The Chinese government has full ability
to control the content aired on all TV channels. Television programing is censored before
it is aired because unpredictable results certainly might cause negative social impact and
unnecessary harmful activities.
Long- Versus Short-Term Orientation.
The last dimension of a national cultural value is identified as long-versus short-
term orientation. This value dimension was found in the answers of student samples from
23 countries around 1985 to the Chinese Value Survey (Hofstede, 2001, p.351).
Hofstede (2001) provided definitions of long and short-term orientations:
Long Term Orientation stands for the fostering of virtues oriented towards future
rewards, in particular, perseverance and thrift. Its opposite pole, Short Term
Orientation, stands for the fostering of virtues related to the past and present, in
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
30/94
30
particular, respect for tradition, preservation of face and fulfilling social
obligations (p. 359)
Hofstede (2001) further pointed out key values of long-term orientation and short-
term orientation. The long-term orientation consists of values including persistence
(perseverance), ordering relationships by status and observing this order, thrift, and
finally, having a sense of shame. The opposite pole, short-term orientation, includes
values of personal steadiness and stability, protecting your face, respect for tradition, and
reciprocation of greetings, favors, and gifts. Hofesde (2001) concluded connotations of
major differences between long-term orientation and short-term orientation, as Table 2.1
provided.
Table 2.1 Summary of Connotations of LTO Differences Found in Surveys and
Other Comparative Studies of Values.
Low LTO High LTO
Quick results expected. Persistence, perseverance
Status not major issue in relationships. Relationships ordered by status and this
order observed. Nice people know how to spend. Nice people are thrifty, sparing with
resources.
Shame is not a common feeling. A sense of shame common.
Personal steadiness and stability Personal adaptability.
Protection of ones face Face considerations common but considereda weakness.
Respect for traditions. Adaptation of traditions to newcircumstances.
Reciprocation of greetings, favors, andgifts.
Reciprocation considerations areproblematic, risk of overspending.
Children should learn tolerance andrespect for other people
Children should learn thrift.
Leisure time important Leisure time not so important.
Most important events in life occurred in More important events in life will occur in
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
31/94
31
past or occur in present future
Students consider persistent not animportant personality trait.
Students consider persistent an importantpersonality trait.
Small share of additional income saved. Large shared of additional income saved
Investment in mutual funds Investment in real estate.
With knowing the major differences between long-term orientation and short-term
orientation, it is important to find out which category American and Chinese cultures
belong to. According to Hofstedes (2001) long-term and short-term orientation index,
the United States scored 29 on this dimension and employs short term oriented culture. In
this sense, the short term oriented culture makes Americans focus on current time and
quick results are expected. American business, for instance, measure the performance on
a short-term basis, which takes the results is a major concern. Meanwhile, Chesebro,
Kim, & Lees (2007) study suggest that the United States has primarily used competition
in the short run, and confrontation in the long run, as its strategies in dealing with North
Korea nuclear testing problem. Ding (2007) provides a good example of how short-term
orientation affects Americans life: American audiences still enjoy weekly broadcast
prime time episodes on major broadcasting networksWithout a doubt, these
broadcasting networks would have changed their programming model immediately if
most audiences were not satisfied with the current situation (p. 71).
China scored 118, which definitely identified that China is a future orientated
country in which perseverance and thrift are appreciated. The concept of long-term
orientation was derived from Confucian Work Dynamism. The values of long-term
orientation inherent to Confucians teaching consisted of four key principles (Hofstede,
2001):
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
32/94
32
First, The stability of society is based on unequal relationships between people.
Second, The family is the prototype of all social organizations.
Third, Virtuous behavior toward others consists of not treating others as one
would not like to be treated oneself.
Fourth, Virtue with regard to ones tasks in life consists of trying to acquire skills
and education, working hard, not spending more than necessary, being patient, and
persevering.
Indeed, the current Chinese society frequently employs a long-term orientation.
The five-year plans of Peoples Republic of China are a series of economic development
initiatives. The key characteristic is mapping strategies for economic development,
setting growth targets, and launching reforms. For instance, on March 14, 2011, the
Chinese government passed the twelfth five-year plan. According to Xinhua Newspaper,
the official press agency of Chinese government, the twelfth five-year plan calls for a
shift away from an economy based on exports and public works projects to one powered
by consumer spending and focuses on rising inequality between poverty and wealth.
Meanwhile, Chesebro, Kim, & Lee (2007) pointed out that China uses a consensus or
compromise strategy, a different communication strategy from that which most other
countries employed, in the short run and collaboration in the long term in dealing with
North Korea nuclear testing problem.
In all, the five cultural value dimensions provide preliminary evidence suggesting
that American and Chinese cultures are polarized. America is a culture of low power
distance, low uncertainty avoidance, and focusing attention on individualism,
masculinity, and using short orientated strategies, while Chinese culture stands on the
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
33/94
33
opposite side of American culture. The only common cultural value between America
and China is that both cultures are masculine cultures. With such evidence, it may
doubtlessly say that American and Chinese cultures are tremendously different. With the
development of globalization, however, recent studies present the theory of cultural
polarization may have limitations. Accordingly, part two provides studies suggesting that
America and China are actually linked and interacted by some sets of universal values,
which provide some new insights and allow to have a better understanding of each
culture.
Global Values
With the rapid development of technology, information is being shared without
physical restrictions. Take social networking as an example;Facebookhas had 800
million registered users of which 75% are outside of the United States (Facebook
Statistics, 2011). Communication and interaction are becoming more frequent and easier
betweenFacebookusers from different nations. Hence, it is not hard to conclude that the
world is associated and connected with global media programs and this globalization is
affecting American and Chinese cultures and making them more relative and common.
From an academic perspective, the values of individualism and collectivism no longer
absolutely differentiate American and Chinese culture. Scholars (Moemeka, 1998; Lim,
Kim and J-Kim, 2010) found that both individualism and collectivism scales could not
produce assumptions that East Asian culture is more collective than Western culture, and
that Westerners are more individualistic than East Asians.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
34/94
34
Moemeka (1998) argued that the authenticity of collectivism as the cultural basis
for Africa as well as Asia, and claims both individualistic and communalistic cultures
have their own types of collectivism, suggesting collectivism constitutes an outer layer of
culture derivable both from individualism and communalism. Lim, Kim and J-Kim
(2010) conducted an empirical study which was developed on Moemekas model of
cultural dimensions and revealed that individualism and collectivism both exist in Korean
culture and American culture. Oyserman,Coon, and Kemmelmeiere (2002) found that
Americans, the prototypical individualists, appeared as collectivistic, similar to Japanese
and Koreans societies. These latter groups were no less individualistic than North
Americans. These findings preliminarily prove that individualism and collectivism are
not fully dichotomous.
These studies suggest both cultures have individualism and collectivism, but
revealed in different ways. American and Chinese cultures may not be totally paradoxical
and dichotomous; rather, there are foundational and common values which link two
cultures and build a common ground for Americans and Chinese. Indeed, taking
advantage of the internet and global media programs, the chance of knowing American
and Chinese cultures is becoming even more normal and frequent. In result, the two
polarizing cultures would be easily understood to Americans and Chinese by having
some sharable and universal values in both cultures.
Rokeach (1972) believes that there is a small set of human values that can and
should be shared by most people because they are important to determine ones attitudes
and behaviors. Schwartz (1992) identified 11 motivationally distinct value types that are
likely to be recognized within and across cultures and used to form value priorities.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
35/94
35
Those 11 value types are: self-direction, stimulation, hedonism, achievement, power,
security, conformity, tradition, benevolence, universalism, and spirituality. He further
recognized that this set of value types is relatively comprehensive, encompassing
virtually all the types of values to which individuals attribute at least moderate
importance as criteria of evaluation. Among all the value types, Schwartz (1992)
assembled evidence from 20 countries showing that power, achievement, and tradition
types were universal, as they emerged in all countries. The hedonism, self-direction,
universalism, and security types were found in 95% of countries, and the stimulation,
benevolence, and conformity types were found in 90% of the countries (p. 38).
Accordingly, the studies of Schwartz (1992) and other scholars have preliminarily
proved that values can be shared across countries and cultures. The following eleven
values, as Table 2.2 presented, is developed from Hofestede (2001) and Schwartz s
(1992) studies, pointing out commonalities between American and Chinese cultures.
Table 2.2. Eleven American and Chinese cultural values
Categories Values Definitions References
PowerDistance
Equality A guarantee to eachindividual of precisely thesame share of an essential
resource, such as food.
Burrell, J. 2010.Evaluating Shared
Access: Social equalityand the circulation ofmobile phones in rural
Uganda. Journal ofComputer-Mediated
Communication 15 (2010)230-250
Individualismand
Collectivism
Individualism A social pattern that consistof loosely link individualswho view themselves as
independent of collectives
Triandis, H. C. (1995).Individualism and
Collectivism. Boulder,CO; Westview.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
36/94
36
Collectivism A social pattern consisting ofclosely linked individualswho view themselves as
parts of one or morecollectives (family, co-
workers, tribe, nation
Triandis, H. C. (1995).Individualism and
Collectivism. Boulder,CO; Westview.
Masculinityand
Femininity
Achievement Reach the summit, win therace
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbsand times, PhilosophicalReview , 66 : 143-160
Competition The effort of two or moreparties acting independently
to secure the business of athird party by offering the
most favorable terms
Merriam-Webster Onlinedictionary
UncertaintyAvoidance
Creativity Uniqueness and imagination Schwartz, S.H (1992).Universals in the content
and structure of values:Theoretical advances and
empirical tests in 20countries. Advances inExperimental Social
Psychology
Transparency Openness, letting people seethe process creation of those
products
Allen, D, S., (2008). TheTrouble withtransparency:
The challenge of doingjournalism ethics in a
surveillance society.Journalism Studies, Vol.9,
No 3.
Long-term andShort-termorientation
Pleasure/Enjoyment
A judgment for which theunderlying dimensionrepresents degrees of
preference.
Parducci, A., (1995).Happiness, Pleasure, and
Judgment: The ContextualTheory and Its
Applications.Psychology Press.
Spirituality Fantasy Something imaginary, notgrounded in reality
Bormann, E.g. (1985).The force of fantasy:
Restoring the American
dream. Carbondale,Illinois: Southern Illinois
University Press
Morality/Ethnic To coexist with others, showrespect for them as part of
Pasquali, A. (1997) TheMoral Dimension of
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
37/94
37
ones life, and give ananthropological dimension to
one of the supremecategories of understanding-
relation
Communicating,Communication Ethnicsand Universal Values,
Sage Publications
Universality Globalization The widening, deepeningand speeding up of
worldwideinterconnectedness, in allaspects of contemporary
social life, from the culturalto the criminal, the financial
to the spiritual
Held, D., McGrew, A.,Goldblatt, D., & Perraton,
J. (1999). Globaltransformations: politics,economics, and culture.Cambridge, UK: Polity
Press.
The value of equality is reflected in the concept of power distance. Hofstede
(2011) stated that culture sets the level of power distance at which the tendency of the
powerful to maintain or increase power distances and the tendency of the less powerful to
reduce them will find their equilibrium (p.83-84). In a low power distance culture, people
tend to view others as friends and equality is emphasized, whereas in high power distance
culture, inequalities amongst people are acceptable and relationships may be considered
one of the most important social matters.
As Moemeka (1998) presented, individualistic and collectivistic values exist in
different manners in most cultures. Accordingly, American and Chinese cultures are not
extremely individualistic or collectivistic; instead, both cultures have realized the value of
independence and collaboration. For instance, American education attaches importance to
collaborative work. Teachers require students to work together in order to compete at
various projects. The Chinese educational system, on the other hand, focused on
independence. More often, students are required to complete homework assessments
individually so that teachers can exam if they understand the knowledge.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
38/94
38
Masculinity and Femininity highlights two individual values: achievement and
competition. In high masculine culture, society and ones social value will be decided by
achievement and competition. Children are expected to be the best in school, and
therefore, classrooms become sports arenas. In this category, America and China have
scored closed numbers 62 and 66 representatively which illustrate America and China
competition and achievements are attentive in both countries.
The uncertainty avoidance category has contained two values: creativity and
transparency. In American and Chinese societies, people are more willing to accept
advice and try something new and different. Simultaneously, transparency promotes
creativity. A high transparent environment must be provided so that more people can
share ideas and eventually make innovative products.
The long-term and short-term orientations, from some extent, determine ones
pleasure and happiness. Materialism is one of the most importance values for American
culture. McEdwards (1971) explained well-being means that more Americans can buy
more bathtubs, refrigerators, and autos than ever before (p. 175), Nowadays, Americans
are reassured of their good life only if they have the financial ability to buy tablets such
as iPad or smart phones such as iPhone 4s for various purposes. The internet and
advanced technology provide a comfortable environment, which entertains people and
provides a better condition for living in American society. Similarly, although Chinese is
a short-term orientated culture, Chinese people desire pleasure more than anything else.
With the economic development, Chinese people are becoming richer. Their increasing
financial ability allows them to buy nice cars and big houses.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
39/94
39
Fantasy and morality are two values that are derived from spirituality. Every
culture has fantasy, which possibly can be shared by group of people. Bormann (1985)
once said that when a group of people have a shared fantasy theme, they have charged
their emotional and memory banks with meanings and emotions that can be set off by a
commonly agreed upon cryptic symbolic cue (p.6). In American and Chinese society,
having a supernatural power is becoming a common fantasy, as reflected in magical films
and Kung Fu movies. Likewise, morality sets certain rules for restricting human
behaviors in ways that society can accept. For instance, plagiarism is considered immoral
in both American and Chinese cultures. Students face different penalizations depending
on various situations and school regulations.
The last value is globalization, which has been commonly realized by most people
and countries. Several researchers noticed that (Appadurai, 1990; Featherstone, 1990;
Marvin M. Kraidy, 1999; Marwan M. Kraidy, 2005; Tomlinson, 2000) the theory of
cultural globalization assumes that the hybrid culture has the power to challenge and
break the dominant culture of national states and that hybrid culture is richer, and more
resistant, democratic, diverse, and heterogeneous than cultures of national states (as cited
in Wang, 2005). Indeed, cultural globalization helps learn from others strong points to
offset weakness. Some major fields such as economy and education found that
interactions between America and China brought benefits. Accordingly, Americans and
Chinese are having a better and deeper understanding of each culture through these
positive interactivities.
Summary
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
40/94
40
Throughout all the literature reviews, cultural differences between American and
Chinese cultures are tremendous and conspicuous. The five major cultural value
perspectives: power distance, individualism and collectivism, uncertainty avoidance,
masculinity and femininity, and finally, long-term and short-term orientation, explicitly
explain that both countries have established their own unique histories, traditions, and
value systems.
Although some scholars have provided strong evidences of supporting cultural
differences between America and China, others believe that nations could have similar
values and establish commonalities. In this study, eleven values: equality, individualism,
collectivism, achievement, competition, creativity, transparency, pleasure, fantasy,
morality, globalization represent core values for both American and Chinese cultures and
preliminarily presented the some limitations of cultural polarizations. To prove the shared
values of American and Chinese cultures, chapter three outlines the methods that are used
in this study.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
41/94
Chapter Three: Methods
Although the U.S and China are two remarkable countries preserving unique
cultures and cultural values, global media programming and the internet have brought
people and cultures closer than ever before. The new generations of American and
Chinese are growing and relying on the Internet. They make new friends on social
networks and learn cultures through computers and television programs. Global
entertainment programming provides easy access for Chinese and Americans to exchange
cultural values. In this process of creating global audience, the concepts of culture and
cultural values have been dramatically changed and new cultural values are emerging in
American and Chinese cultures.
With internet and global media programming, Americans and Chinese find more
and more common ground. The relationships between the two countries are becoming
more interactive. From a geographical perspective, the areas of China and the U.S. are
literally the same. The U.S. has 379 million square miles and China has 370 million
square miles. From an economic perspective, both countries are relying and depending on
each other. The New York Times reports the American trade deficit with China grew to
$29 billion, its largest level ever (Brustein, 2011). Meanwhile, the US-China Business
Council (2010) published that United States is the top export destination and top trade
partner for China. From a historical perspective, America and China are both young.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
42/94
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
43/94
43
Campbell has argued that criticism is epideictic in the end and deliberative and
forensic in means (p. 4-13). That is, the intent, objective, and purpose of criticism
is to praise/dispraise, judge, or evaluate (Jasinski, 1992, p. 198).
The concept of criticism not only extends the meaning of experience, but reflects
symbolic and cognitive systems. Chesebro and Bertelsen (1996) further elaborated the
concept of criticism:
Criticism is a practice, but it also constitutes a body of guidelines, techniques, and
applied illustrations that can be used to analyze communication technologies as
symbolic and cognitive systems (p. 58).
Although critics purposively describe, interpret, and evaluate their activities,
Broke and Scott (1980) noticed that the function of the critic is to indicate, point out, and
draw the attention of others to the phenomenon.
With more or less awareness of the implications of his activity, the critic endows
with meaning the phenomenon to which he attendsIn taking responsibility for
his shapings, the critics purpose becomes interpretive. Finally, the critic
judges(p.18)
Chesebro and Bertelsen (1996) further examined examples of critical discourse
and identified 11 key features ofcriticism (p. 61-67).
1. Criticism is a form of extensional discourse.2. Criticism is epideictic.3. Criticism is deliberative.4. Criticism is reason giving.5. Criticism is self-reflexive and ideological.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
44/94
44
6. Criticism is persuasion7. Criticism assesses the effectiveness of the communicative act8. Criticism involves an appreciation of form.9. Criticism constitutes an exploration of the applied and theoretical.10.Criticism is a form of self-exploration and self-expression.11.Criticism is entertainment.Indeed, criticism describes, interprets, evaluates, and eventually extends the
meaning of communicative acts. Critics describe the original communicative acts and
interpret them based on previous experiences and knowledge. In the process of
interpretation, criticism introduces and adds understandings of the experience which
discovers the potential meaning that may not be found without critical analysis. Critics
not only collect information, but judge and evaluate the value of communicative acts. In
this sense, criticism is persuasive. It provides reasons and gives evidences to convince
audience arguments. Towards to the end, criticism extends and applies the values of
communicative acts to reflect cultural significances. Ding (2007) asserts that criticism
assesses the meaning and value of the communicative act to society and to a culture not
just data collection but a critical view provides a statement of meaning and value and
importance to a culture (p. 39). Criticism is relied on critics.
As Chesebro and Bertelsen (1996) argued that criticism is a self-exploration and
self-expression, critics are crucial to judgments and evaluations. A critic must admit who
he/she is. Cultural background and life experience are most important to this study. I was
born and raised in China, speaking Chinese and watching Chinese television programs. I
was taught in China and requested to be modest in behavior and respect authority.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
45/94
45
Meanwhile, I grew up in Shanghai- a city where Western and Eastern cultures are mixed.
Additionally, as one of the Millennials, I grew up with the internet and various digital
technologies which extend my capability of knowing and understanding other cultures.
Since the idea of social networks started disseminating, I have benefited from seven
platforms:Facebook, Twitter, Google+,LinkedIn,Renren,Kaixin, and Weibo
(micoblog). I made friends from numerous countries and learned their cultures through
online communication.
Knowing cultures through the internet might be selective, inaccurate, and
prejudiced. Accordingly, I decided to come to and live in the U.S. Face-to-face
communication is a complement to online interaction. Meeting with new American
friends, joining American cultural traditions, and immersing in American college
education helped me observe a real American culture. Combining my experience gained
from the Internet and real life in the United States, I have obtained a better understanding
of American culture. From the experiences of both cultures, I have generated a strong
sense of feeling that both American and Chinese cultures are becoming similar.
In all, criticism provides better understanding of American and Chinese culture.
Four methods: content analysis, media criticism, analog criticism, and axiological
analysis are employed in this study. Each of the five methods is explained in detail and
described the function of their use throughout the rest of this chapter.
Content analysis
Content analysis is important to this study. It obtains knowledge and finds new
understanding of the two talent shows in two cultures. Krippendorff (2004) defined
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
46/94
46
content analysis as a research technique for making replicable and valid inferences from
text (or other meaningful matter) to the content of their useAs a research technique,
content analysis provides new insights, increases a researchs understanding of particular
phenomena, or informs practical actions (p. 18).
The text in Krippendorffs definition refers to other meaningful matter to
indicate that in content analysis works of art, images, maps sounds, signs, symbols, and
even numerical records as data. In this study, content analysis is used to analyze and
compare the formats ofAmericas Got Talentand Chinas Got Talent. The two talent
shows were chosen because they represent the front-runners in the entertainment
industry. Hansen, Cottle, Negrine, and Newbold (1998) further stated:
The purpose of content analysis is to identify and count occurrences of specified
characteristics of dimensions of tests, and through this, to be able to say
something about the messages, images, and representations of such tests and their
wide social significance (p.95).
According to Ding (2007), in cultural study, content analysis is an important
method to be used to examine how the two talent television shows were laid out in front
of the audience in the different culture backgrounds. Ding (2007) continued arguing that
content analysis is employed to compare the details of two talent shows, a procedure
which reveals new insight of two cultures. Therefore, discovering and interpreting the
content acquired fromAmericas Got Talentand Chinas Got Talentprovides a better
understanding of two cultures and an easier approach to find common values. With
obtaining knowledge from content, media criticism provides another new insight from a
technological perspective.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
47/94
47
Media Criticism
Digital technology improves human life. Today, people rely on different media to
exchange information. The Pew Internet & American Life Project(2011) found that one
third of American adults-35%-own smartphones, frequently using them to check emails
or log on social networks. Likewise, computers become daily necessary for the Chinese.
People do various activities on the internet. According to the International Data
Corporation (IDC), the premier global provider of information technology, China has
passed the U.S. in PC shipments in the second quarter of 2011.
Therefore, technology is becoming the center for both Americans and Chinese.
Hence, as a method, media criticism is powerful and important to this study. The subjects
of this study are two television production shows. Employing media criticism greatly
evaluates similarities and differences in terms of interpreting communicative messages.
Scodari and Thorpe (1992) predetermined what media criticism should and should not be:
Simply stated, legitimate media criticism involves the intellectual, subjective
analysis and/or evaluation of media artifacts, policies, technologies, and/or
institutions by disinterested persons who do not stand to personally profit as a
consequence of their specific criticism (p.3).
Chesebro and Bertelsen (1996) argued that media criticism is the product of
consistent application of critical principles to media technologies as communication
systems. They further proclaimed the goal of media criticism:
The goal of the analysis of communication technologies is the explication of
cognitive, behavioral, and motivational dimensions and the consequences of
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
48/94
48
communication media in an effort to enhance the quality of human symbol using
(p. 70).
Indeed, viewing the same program through different media platforms alters
individuals cognition, behavior, and motivation. Most audiences watchAmericas Got
Talentand Chinas Got Talenton traditional television sets. With the development of
digital technologies, however, media programming is no longer limited by a single
device. People have multiple access such as computers and mobile devices to watch the
two shows. In this study, media criticism interprets messages and acts which provide new
insights of how media affects ones attitude, behavior, and values.
Meanwhile, Chesebro and Bertelsen (1996) suggested that media criticism
functions in six ways (p. 71-74):
First, media criticism can reveal the subtle and unnoticed complex stimuli
embedded in media experiences.
Second, media criticism can reveal how media systems affect human cognition.
Third, media criticism can reveal the effects of media systems, particularly their
effect on individuals and society.
Fourth, media criticism can alter the communication process by introducing
quality-control components into the media communication system.
Fifth, media criticism can create counterarguments to the messages generated by
media technologies.
Sixth, media criticism can generate individual, rather than social class, reactions
to media experiences, energizing the media user in an attempt to shift him or her from an
inactive to an active role.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
49/94
49
Through the six functions, media criticism exposes new insights of media
experiences and the influence of value systems. The knowledge gained from media
criticism helps to lead a better understanding of how media systems powerfully alter
individual attitude, cognition, perception, and eventually values. Gathering all knowledge
and insights, analog criticism analyzes and compares the similarities and differences
acquired from content analysis and media criticism.
Analog criticism
Analog criticism, as a method, is used to allow this research to compare the two
talent shows and find similarities and differences of each television show. Rosenfield
(1968) used analog criticism to compare two remarkably similar speeches addressed by
Presidents Richard Nixon and Harry Truman. Rosenfield (1968) stated:
The generic resemblance of the two speeches (both may be classified as mass-
media apologia) invites what may be called analog criticism-comparing the
speeches in such ways that each address serves as a reference standard for the
other (p. 435).
In this study,Americas Got Talentand Chinas Got Talentare classified as talent
shows, belonging to a reality television programming.Americas Got Talentand Chinas
Got Talentserves as a reference standard for each other. Rosenfield (1968) further
addressed the advantages of using analog criticism:
The objective of such a method of comparison and contrast is two-fold: to specify
the fundamental anatomical features which relate the two speeches and to assess
the relative artistic merit of each speech, compared to the other (p. 435).
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
50/94
50
In this research, analog criticism allows to recognize both similarities and
differences of each television show. As Rosenfield (1968) suggested: comparison of these
particular speeches is fruitful on several countsSecond, the identification of similar
qualities in the two messages suggests the critic certain constants operating in an
otherwise undefined form (p. 435). Thus, employing analog criticism greatly helps to
generate a better understanding of similarities and differences of American and Chinese
cultural values.
Axiological analysis
Last but not least, this study is so grounded on American and Chinese cultural
values. The essential question of this study is if American and Chinese cultures have had
commonalties, regarding to cultural values. As Chesebro (1973) explained:
Each cultural system can be viewed as a distinct rhetorical genre; an axiological
analysis of each genre would now allow us to identify the competing sets of value
judgments. (p. 15).
Chesebro (1973) further argued that in order to distinguish the value orientation of
each culture, rhetorical critics traditionally examine discourse from an axiological
perspective, which allows the rhetorician to identify, as Redding and Steele put it, those
values which function as premises for persuasion. Hence, an axiological analysis would
help to find out cultural values of each country.
Meanwhile, Angeles (1981, p. 4) argues that the study of aesthetics might include
the "analysis of the values" in terms of "our experience of and judgments about things
made by humans or found in nature which we call beautiful." Indeed, an aesthetic
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
51/94
51
analysis of the values should be well considered in a study of culture. A low level of
aesthetic value was one of the major reasons that Super Girlwas terminated. According
to Liu Zhongde, a standing committee member of the National Committee of the Chinese
Peoples Political Consultative Conference, claimed that contestants dressed "in vulgar
fashion" that was socially "harmful", especially to young people's "aesthetic values". He
further found "a vulgar trend" among candidates in the recent years "Many young people
tried to appeal to the audience by making fools of themselves. Their behavior not only
sullied themselves, but also degraded art". Chinas Got Talent, on the other hand,
provides a cultural instruction by presenting noble values through the show. In this
analysis, however, a strict view of axiology is employed here as defined by Angeles
(1981) as "The analysis of values to determine their meaning, characteristics, origins,
types, criteria, and epistemological status (p. 22).
This research treatsAmericas Got Talentand Chinas Got Talentas two cultural
icons, representatively reflected American and Chinese cultural values. Both countries
produce the shows by carrying out cultural values. Thus, employing axiological analysis
is particularly important, as it takes a more critical perspective to explaining and
identifying two cultures by values.
Summary
This study employs an eclectic approach to answering the five questions posed in
the chapter one: Is the concept ofvalue changing? Is this change international? Are
digital technologies and systems, such as the internet, fostering these transformations
throughout the world? Does global popular culture generate some sets of universal values
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
52/94
52
at least in television industry? Can Americans and Chinese share similar cultural values?
This type of approach allows for the use of a combination of four distinct methods:
content analysis, media criticism, analog criticism, and axiological analysis. Content
analysis is used to scientifically find new insights in two talent shows and examine
cultural values through it. Media criticism allows discovering the change of American
and Chinese cultural values from a technological perspective. Analog criticism helps to
recognize the similarities and differences of the two shows. Finally, axiological analysis
reveals the American and Chinese cultural values, reflected in Americas Got Talentand
Chinas Got Talent. Chapter four presents findings ofAmericas Got Talentand Chinas
Got Talent.
-
8/2/2019 Wu Final Body
53/94
Chapter Four: Findings
This chapter presents findings to answer the five research questions presented in
chapter two. Based on an eclectic approach that links four research methods, this chapter
presents the idea of emerging global popular culture and common cultural values
grounded in American and Chinese societies. This research begins by examining the
findings from an axiological content analysis ofAmericas Got talentand Chinas Got
talent. Throughout the axiological content analysis, it is initially noticed that the two
talent shows are literately the same, as they both belong to same series of reality
competition television shows and have the same production formats. Moreover, it
explores American and Chinese cultural values r