your groups positive results | negative results. teams (ai)(gii) hierarchical pdm team
TRANSCRIPT
YOUR GROUPSPOSITIVE RESULTS
| | | | | | | | |
NEGATIVE RESULTS
TEAMS
(AI) (GII)
HIERARCHICAL PDMTEAM
HIERARCHICALTEAM (AI)
GOAL
GOAL GOAL GOAL
TASK TASK TASKTASK TASK TASK
“TEAMWORK IS A LOT OF PEOPLE DOING WHAT I SAY.” (MKT.EXEC, CITRIX CORPORATION)
PARTICIPATIVE DECISION MAKING
(PDM)
POSSIBLE ADVANTAGES:
• GREATER INFORMATION• MORE APPROACHES• INCREASED ACCEPTANCE• BETTER COMPREHENSION OF
DECISION
PDM
POSSIBLE DISADVANTAGES:
• PREMATURE DECISIONS• INDIVIDUAL DOMINATION• CONFLICTING SOLUTIONS• PRIOR COMMITMENT• AMBIGUOUS RESPONSIBILITY
PDM
+OR -?
• DISAGREEMENT• CONFLICTS• TAKING RISKS• TIME REQUIREMENTS
PDM
WHEN TO USE?
VROOM-YETTON MODEL
PDMWHEN TO USE (NORMAN MEIER)
GROUP
FLIPCOIN
EXPERT/ LEADER
CONFERENCE LEADERSHIP
HIGH
LOW
LOW HIGH QUALITY
AC
CE
PT
AN
CE
PDMPRECONDITION:
***TRAINED GROUP***
• COMMUNICATION• TRUST• ACTIVE• TAKE RESPONSIBILITY• PROBLEM SOLVING
•COMPONENTS OF PDM
• LEADER
• SELECT PARTICIPANTS (QUALIFIED)
• STATE CONSTRAINTS
• LEADER NOT STATE OPINION
• PROTECT QUALITY
• PROTECT ACCEPTANCE
• MANAGE VOCAL PEOPLE
• DRAW OUT QUIET
• MANAGE MEETING
COMPONENTS OF PDM
• Listen to understand
• Willingness to change position
• All members generally participating
• Trying out new ideas on each other
• Finding stimulation in disagreement
• Interacting and reaching consensus
PDM: EFFECTIVE ACTIVITIES
• Selling preferred opinions
• Listening to refute/not listening at all
• Defending one’s position to the end
• A few members dominating
• Reacting unfavorably to disagreement
• Converting others by 1-to-1 attempts
PDM: INEFFECTIVE ACTIVITIES