zj. shen, m. kawakami, p. chen kanazawa university, japan 2006. ddss
DESCRIPTION
Study on Development and Application of MAS for Impact Analysis of Large-scale Shopping Center Development. ZJ. Shen, M. Kawakami, P. Chen Kanazawa University, Japan 2006. DDSS. Contents. Introduction Location Regulations for B-shops Framework of Shopsim-MAS Policy Scenarios Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Study on Development and Application of MAS for Impact Analysis of Large-scale Shopping Center Development
ZJ. Shen, M. Kawakami, P. Chen
Kanazawa University, Japan
2006. DDSS
Contents
Introduction
Location Regulations for B-shops
Framework of Shopsim-MAS
Policy Scenarios Evaluation
Discussion and Further Research
Background
The commercial environment of many local cities in Japan is experiencing decline in their centre areas.Local governments have developed all kinds of city center generation policies to constrain this trend and revitalize the central city commercial environment.It is difficult to evaluate the potential impact of current policies on the city future due to the uncertainty inherent in urban system.MAS simulation is reconized as a tool to visualize impact of planning policies for presenting the complexity of the urban system.
Introduction
Picture of center area in metropolitan
prosperous commercial street in Osaka
Introduction
Pictures of center area in local city
Decline of commercial environment
Introduction
Pictures of large-shopping mall
In suburban area
Contents
Introduction
Location Regulations for B-shops
Framework of Shopsim-MAS
Policy Scenarios Evaluation
Discussion and Further Research
Location Regulations for B-shops
Urbanization
Control Area
White Land
•Commercial district•Quasi –industrial district•Industrial distinct•2nd residential district•Quasi-residential district•Neighborhood commercial district
•1st low-rise exclusive residential district•2nd low-rise exclusive residential district•1st mid-high rise exclusive residential district•2nd mid-high rise exclusive residential district•1st residential district•Exclusive industrial distinct
X
Urban planning area
X
Land use zone
Urbanization
Promoting Area
B-shops are not permitted to locate in these land zoning district
B-shops can be permitted to locate in these land zoning district
In principle, any development are prohibit in Urbanization Control Area
Permitting state
Planning regulations on location of large-scale shopping center
(B-shop)
Location Regulations for B-shops
Land use zoning
Location Regulations for B-shops
Bylaw regarding location and floor space
Location Regulations for B-shopsPrinciple scenarios for shopping center location as Decision table for
developer agent (Bylaw regulations and land use zonings)
C1 Scenario
C2Location is incenter N Y Y
C3Location matcheszone type N / / N / N
C4
Location isconsistent withbylaw N / / / N / / N /
C5
Distance toexisting shops isappropriate Y N / / / / Y N / / / Y N / /
A1Set potentiallocation Y / / / / / Y / / / / Y / / /
A2Set floor spaceup-limit N / / / / / 10000 / / / / 3000 / / /
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15
Y
Y
Center Activation
Y
Neighborhood Commerce Promoting
Y
Y
N
Railway Station Development
Y
Y
N
Location Regulations for B-shops
The location alternatives are limited in the possible areas according to land use zonings regulation and bylaw regarding large-scale shopping mall.
These location alternatives reflect the different scenarios of commercial development.
Contents
Introduction
Location Regulations for B-shops
Framework of Shopsim-MAS
Policy Scenarios Evaluation
Discussion and Further Research
Framework of Shopsim-MAS
provincial city of Japan Mono central
> urban sprawl > suburb house development > large suburban shopping mall
Poly central > declination in inner city > Policy change -> location regul
ations of lager shopping mall
Framework of Shopsim-MAS --- Shop choice (percolation model)
Percolation model for getting spatial patternPercolation probability Ps or Pb
Pb for shopping in B-shop
Ps for shopping in S-shop
Pb + Ps = 1
If Pb > 0.5 then percolation phenomenon will occur.
To keep the S_shop market share, Ps should be more than 0.5 B-shop
S-shop
Framework of Shopsim-MAS --- Shop choice (percolation model)
A random utility model for shopping Probability in Percolation model
Agents’ (Household) shop choice of B_shop or S_shop Chose B_shop if Uib > Uis Chose S_shop if Uis > Uib
B-shop
S-shop
ijijij VU
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----Shop choice (percolation model)
A random utility model for household shop choice:
The random factor can be used to adjust percolation probability, which will generate diverse spatial patterns
TCXfV ijkijk
jij )(
)()(22
yyxxTC jijiiij
ijijij VU
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----shop choice model
According to local regulations of large scale shopping mall,
influence factors of percolation probability should be set as location (set as decision table )and floor area.
Xkij is the kth attribute describing store j attracting household i., price: X1j =Pj and
floor space: X2j =Sj (Price Pj is added by authors)
distance: Cij is a measure of the disutility of travel between site of household i and site of shop j. (Cij is added by authors)
Shopping choice in simulation based on utility is deterministic process, as random factor to control individual choice.
ij
Framework of Shopsim-MAS --- Shop choice (percolation model)
Cij is a measure of the disutility of travel between site of household i and site of shop j.
Percolation probability become unstable in this case, however it is relative to its spatial position.
B-shop
S-shop
H
H → B-shop distance
H → S-shop distance
)()( BhBh yyxx
)()( ShSh yyxx
TCXfV ijkijk
jij )(
Framework of Shopsim-MAS --- Shop choice (percolation model)
percolation probability is shifted if household position is near ot far away from a shop.
B-shop
S-shop
H
To S-shopCij shorter Ps(Sj,Pj,Cij) larger
To S-shopCij longer Ps(Sj,Pj,Cij) smaller
H
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----spatial pattern (percolation model)
random value was set to translate the probability of random utility model into simulation in Uib, 10000in Uis, 10000Rate of shoping in B_shop=0.08 in S_shop=0.92
price in S 300, in B 200
travel cost 120/cell
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----spatial pattern (percolation model)
random value was set to translate the probability of random utility model into simulation in Uib, 10000in Uis, 5000Rate of shoping in B_shop=0.5 in S_shop=0.5
price in S 300, in B 200
travel cost 120/cell
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----spatial pattern (percolation model)
random value was set to translate the probability of random utility model into simulationin Uib, 5000in Uis, 5000Rate of shopping in B_shop=0.94 in S_shop=0.06
price in S 300, in B 200
travel cost 120/cell
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----spatial pattern (percolation model)
random value was set to translate the probability of random utility model into simulationin Uib, 2000in Uis, 2000Rate of shopping in B_shop=0.16 in S_shop=0.84
price in S 300, in B 200
travel cost 120/cell
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----spatial pattern (percolation model)
random value was set to translate the probability of random utility model into simulation in Uib, 500in Uis, 500(critical point)Rate of shoping in B_shop=0.24 in S_shop=0.76
price in S 300, in B 200
travel cost 120/cell
Framework of Shopsim-MAS ---shop choice model
Therefore, percolation Probability of B_shop or S_shop is decided by Pj, Sj and Cij. For translating probability of random utility model into agent’s individual behavior, a random variable is defined.
If percolation probability changed gradually, the spatial pattern of percolation will be changed gradually. This phenomenon can be used in the market share simulation using MAS.
However, how about fitness of Individual shopping choice based on ramdam utility and percolation probability in simulation is still a further study.
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----uban space and agents
Urban Space
Agents Planner Developer Shop
S-shop B-shop
Household
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----object model
Framework of Shopsim-MAS----Simulation Process
1. The user of Shopsim-MAS defines a policy scenario to be implemented. -> decision table
2. The planner agent sets the spatial structure and initiates the scenario.
3. S-shop agents and existing B-shop agents are created in the urban space. Household agents are created and distributed to the whole central city urban planning area.The developer agent places the new B-shop in urban space according to defined scenarios.
4. The user sets the initial values of parameters .For clear simulation results, random value is set as 500 under critical point.
5. Households then decide where to go shopping until their demands are fulfilled (demands of each household=50).
Contents
Introduction
Location Regulations for B-shops
Framework of Shopsim-MAS
Policy Scenarios Evaluation
Discussion and Further Research
Policy Scenarios Evaluation----Define four cases of scenario
Base Scenario No new B-shop are permitted to develop
Centre Activation(CA) B-shop can only locate in the centre commercial area without up
per limitation for floor space.
Railway Station Development (RSD) B-shop can only be opened near the station, with an upper limit
ation of 10000 m2.
Neighbouring Commerce Promotion (NCP) B-shop can only locate in neighbour commercial area, with an up
per limitation of 3000 m2.
Policy Scenarios Evaluation----Analysis of CA scenario
3000m2
Market share of existing B-shop
Market share of the new B-shop
Market share of S-shop
5000m2 20000m215000m210000m28000m2
Sale statistics in CA scenario
The spatial effects of CA scenario as shown in figures.
It can be see that CA scenario do have effect in improving the market performance of the city centre, but may do severe harm to the centre S-shops at the same time if there is no limitation on B-shop’s scale.
Floor space =
Policy Scenarios Evaluation----Compare scenarios
Sale statistics of Center shops and S-shops
Market share of existing B-shop
Market share of S-shop
Base CA NCP
RSD
To compare three scenarios, the floor space of the new B-shop is set same as 3000m2.
Both Figures show that in RSD and NCP scenario, the loss of market share of S-shops caused by the new B-shop is more than in CA scenario .
Both Figures also indicate that CA scenario might be the only effective to improve center commerce among three scenarios.
Contents
Introduction
Location Regulations for B-shops
Framework of Shopsim-MAS
Policy Scenarios Evaluation
Discussion and Further Research
Discussion and Further Research
The use of MAS for impact analysis of large scale shopping center development regulations is proposed in this paper. By introducing real urban land use zoning to form agent’s behavior constraints, the Shopsim-MAS simulate the virtual urban space in a more practical way in the context of urban planning. Percolation model and random utility model are employed in this simulation and spatial pattern of the market share influenced by urban bylaw and planning regulations can be visualized.The simulation results of four possible policy scenarios indicate that to develop new B-shop in the city center might be an effective measure to improve commercial activity of city centre.
However, how about the behavior of households (random factors in this simulation that will influence the spatial pattern of market share) ?