© 2019 ijrar january 2019, volume 6, issue 1 communal ...ijrar.org/papers/ijrar1blp180.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1235
Communal Violence in India and Legislative
framework to Control Riots: A Chronological Study Dalliandeep Kaur Tiwana,
Abstract
Communal violence in India is reality since time immemorial. India being the secular country is
home to the different religions and cultures. Mutual tolerance and inter-dependence upon each other
irrespective of the religion used to be the essence of the Indian society. With the advent of British
rule in India the policy of divide and rule was launched in the nation. People started fighting on the
name of the caste and religion. Violence based on religion and caste has become a distinctive
feature of Indian democratic setup today. The incident can only be regarded as communal riot if
there is element of violence in it. Prior to the independence we had witnessed number of communal
riots in the country and even after independence also. The present research work is an attempt to
analyze the incidences of communal violence in India in a chronological order and to trace the real
reasons behind such violence. Researcher has also made an attempt to look into legislative
provisions available to combact such violence in India.
Introduction
Riots based on religion and caste has become a distinctive feature of Indian democratic setup today. Whenever the
two different groups having different religion, different ideologies, which consider themselves as self conscious
communities, came into clash with each other, it fallout in to ethnic riots. The incident can only be regarded as ethnic
riot, if there is element of violence between the members of different communal identified groupsi. The major causes
for such type of riots are trivial only but the real root causes of them are different political considerations, approach to
different materialistic resources and power. Historically we had witnessed different types of communal violence since
British rule in the country. In Ahmadabad much before the independence there were different events of communal
riots in the year 1714, 1715, and 1716 and in the year 1750. According to “ Bipan Chandra, in his book
Communalism in Modern India, he stated that communal violence began to occur only in the last quarter of 19th
century but they did not occur in India on any significant scale till the year 1946-1947”ii. After partition India has
faced the communal violence almost every year. Each time ideological groups accused one another however couldn't
give any answer for stop the mutual savagery. From the very starting of the ethnic violence, parties with secular
ideologies blames the parties with communal ideologies for its occurrence and the parties with communal ideologies
blame the double policy of parties with secular ideologies, but ultimate victim of this are innocent people.
Communal riots are the major cause for disturbing peace in the country. We live in the country where there are
number of religions, cultures and languages and to maintain unity in this diversity there is need of coordination
among the different groups in the society. But actually this does not happens often there are clashes in our society for
insignificant reasons but often it takes the colour of communities and people fought among them. India as a nation
was held by our elders in the concept of brotherhood and universal peace. Historical study of India as a nation revels
that the ideas for communal peace and co-operation were its foundations. India being the secular nation, everyone has
the freedom to follow their religion. It is seen that riots does not occur spontaneously they are the outcome of
different political interests with the economic motive behind them. Since the year the year 1990 there has been a
considerable change in the pattern of communal riots. It is often seen that religious conviction is not only the reason
of these kinds of riots, it was seen that during the partition there was a clash between ideological interests of the
major political representatives of distinct political parties and it become the major cause of riots based on religioniii.
In any case, from the year1960 till the 1980s, the neighborhood ideological and monetary elements assumed a
significant job in inciting violence. The rise of “Hindutva” issues over the most recent twenty years has been a reason
Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1236
for mutual mobs right now the nearby factors have additionally helped in impelling uproars. A large portion of these
spots had an impressive level of Muslim populace whose political or monetary interests conflicted with those of the
Hindus. In addition, the significant mob violence happened in the rule of congress party in these provinces and some
of the violence took place at the time of Janta party alliance government at Center. Mob violence right now has
happened in the towns or rustic regions like the “ Biharsharif riots”, and majority of them remained unreported .
Along these lines it is essential to recognize this stage from the year 1990s in which the BJP and its sister associations
have been dynamic in prompting collective mobs. Since 1990 the communal violence need to be addressed in the
beam of changing political ideologies and equations in the country. The emergence of BJP at center along with
decline of congress party has affected the nature of communal riots in the country. In the last twenty years mob
violence is the result of handling of religious feelings of the general people by the staunch Hindu Organisations in
order to attain political gains. The politicization of the Mandir-Masjid issue and the resulting destruction of the
Mosque allowed the BJP the chance to merge its vote bank. This has divided the people on the communal lines which
have given rise to frequent incidents of communal violence in the country. Communal riots happened both at the time
of congress and B.J.P . The states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu has also seen the violence in the recent time and is
becoming the communal sensitive area. Collective viciousness has entered another stage with the Christians and
individuals from other minority religions being made the survivors of arranged assaults. Collective mobs right now
been both urban and rustic highlights, yet the degree of harm is constantly more prominent in the flourishing focuses
of exchange and trade. Ancestral populace in the rustic zones is being compelled to engage in the assaults on
Christians and Muslims by bringing them inside the Hindutva structure. Aside from financial reasons, the call for
Hindu solidarity which is fundamentally a way to accomplish political advantage is the principle hotspot for shared
viciousness right now. Ideological groups have consistently taken part in actuating and abusing collective savagery in
order to meet their discretionary advantages. In spite of the fact that collective mobs are censured in different
quarters, there is as yet complete inaction both from the organization and the decision governments in numerous
states. Though strict celebrations and parades are commonly the beginning stages of shared mobs, still adequate
security isn't given during these occasions. There is likewise very little reaction against episodes of mutual
viciousness from the common society. Till the time the ideological groups which prompt mutual mobs are casted a
ballot to control, the motivations to battle communalism won't have the option to grow completely. Mutual clash has
now become a disease of our general public. Communalism in its astonishing sign of Hindu-Muslim uproars
represents the best risk to the prosperity and soundness of society and state. Different strict and phonetic minorities
have additionally endured hugely during the most recent decades. Outrages against Christians came in sharp
concentration in consuming alive of Stein and his two minor children in a vehicle. In spite of the fact that this episode
stunned the country and the world yet Christian homes and holy places kept on being burnt in Gujarat and a few
different pieces of the nation. Against Sikh uproars in Delhi and U.P. gave a genuine shock to the solidarity of the
nation and Sikhs kept on enduring in Punjab and different spots. The Kashmiri Pundits were methodically estranged
and compelled to become evacuees in their own nation. Comparable wrongdoings by aggressors of various tones
made life hopeless for North Indians in Mumbai and North East.
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1237
Communal Violence In Post Independence Era
Sr.
No
Year Place Communi
ties and
organizati
ons
involved
Deaths Inquiry
commission
s
Remarks
1 1947 Calcutta
and
Naokhali,
Bengal
Muslims
and
Hindus
Unknown --------- This has resulted into
large scale destruction of
Hunan lives and propertyiv
2 1947 Lahore and
Amritsar,
Punjab
Muslims
and
Hindus
5000 --------- “Punjab was the worst
effected duringthe
Partition riots. It was the
key to the issue of
partition and thus to the
constitutional fate of
India. In Lahore
and Amritsar armed mobs
murdered
the people and burnt their
homes”
3 1953 Ahmedaba
d
Muslims
and
Hindus
Unknown --------- Ganapati festival and
Moharram coincidev
4 1961 Jabalpur Muslims
and
Hindus
Unknown Justice Shiv
Dayal
Srivastava
Committee
“A new phase began with
the Jabalpur
riots when local factors
started
playing an important role
in
instigating violence. This
riots were started with the
elopement of Hindu girl
with Muslim boy”.
5 1964 Rourkela,
Calcutta,
Jamshedpu
r
Muslims
and
Hindus
2000, and
mostly
Muslims
__________
Due to the business rivalry
between Muslims and
Hindus over the trade of
liquor. Administration had
given a free hand to
people in these riotsvi
6 1967 Hatia,
Ranchi
started
Muslims
and
Hindus
164
Muslims
and 19
Hindus
Raghubir
Dayal
Commission
“It batting of a students’
procession urging that
Urdu be made the
second official language
of Biharvii. 195 shops
looted and burnt, three
places of worship
damaged by arson”.
7 1968 Aurangaba Muslims 1 Hindu __________ It started with accidental
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1238
d and
Hindus
was killed injury to a cow by Muslim
boyviii.
8 1968 Assam Muslims
and
Hindus
41 Hindus
and 41
Muslims
were Killed
__________ “A cow belonging to a
Muslim trespassed into a
Hindu house. When a
Hindu boy tried to chase
the cow away, a few
Muslims beat him up”ix.
9 1969 Ahmadaba
d
Hindus
and
Muslims
512 Justice
P.Jaganmoh
a
n Reddy
“Communal riots between
Hindus and Muslims
occurred near the
Jagannath Temple in
September. The riots
spread to 25 more
Localities”x
10 1970 Bhiwandi,
Maharashtr
a
Hindus
and
Muslims
17 Hindus
and 59
Muslims
were dead
D. P. Madan
Commission
of Inquiry
“1,286 Muslims and 323
Hindus were arrested after
the riot”xi
11 1970 Jalgaon,
Maharashtr
a
Hindus
and
Muslims
42 Muslims
and 1
Hindu was
killed
D. P. Madan
Commission
of Inquiry
These riots started with
the molestation of
,married Hindu women by
Muslim youthxii
12 1970 Mahad,
Maharashtr
a
Hindus
and
Muslims
6 Muslims
and 9
Hindus
were Killed
D. P. Madan
Commission
of Inquiry
These riots were the
outcome of the
announcement of
Bhiwandi riots over All
India Radio which took
place among Muslims
and Hindus in which
around 250 people were
killedxiii
13 1972 Nonari and
Sajni, Uttar
Pradesh
Muslim
and
Hindus
1 death ________ “Violence Started on15th
November after the
murder of Harijan Leader
by the Muslims and
afterwards one hundred
seven houses of Muslims
were looted and seventy
six were set on fire”xiv.
14 1977 Varanasi,
Uttar
Pradesh
Muslim
and
Hindus
5 Muslims
were killed
__________
__
“The police instigated the
riots by going to the
Muslim locality and
beating up the weavers.
This led to a worsening of
the situation and further
clashes taking place. In
another incident the police
did
not make proper
arrangements when a
Hindu procession was
crossing a Muslim
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1239
locality. The police,
instead of firing at the
miscreants in the stabbing
incident, started firing on
the Muslims”.
15 1978 Sambhal,
Uttar
Pradesh
Muslim
and
Hindus
2 Muslims
and 23
Hindus
were killed
Riots started due to the
trade rivalry between
Hindus and Muslimsxv.
16 1978,
October
Aligarh,
Uttar
Pradesh
Muslim
and
Hindus
30 deaths _________ These riots were started as
the result of murder of
Hindu by the Muslims and
there was a procession
demanding the
punishment for this
murder, which resulted
into riotsxvi.
17 1978,
Septem
ber
Hyderabad,
Andhra
Pradesh
Muslim
and
Hindus
19 people
were killed
_______ Group started
throwing stones on a
“Ganesh procession”
Consisting more than
2000 people, this resulted
into riots
18 1979 Jamshedpu
r,
Bihar
Adivasis
(Hindu)an
d Muslims
Around 120
people were
killed and
majority of
them were
muslims
Jitendra
Narain
Commission
of Inquiry
The findings of the
commission report was
that it was a deliberate act
by the local leader and in
this not a single Hindu
was killed
19 1980 Moradabad
,
Uttar
Pradesh
Muslim
and
Hindus
Around
2000 people
died in this
riots
This violence started
between the Hindus and
Muslims during the Id-
prayers. There was a
existing business rivalry
between the two groupsxvii
20 1981 Biharsharif
,
Bihar
Muslim
and
Hindus
Around 80
people died
in these
riots
Balasubram
an
ian
Commission
set up by the
Bihar
Government
“In these riots trouble
stated in the village of
Gagandiwan having
majority population of
Muslims .Dispute started
over the piece of land
between Hindus and
Muslims. The findings of
the commission reveled
that the administration did
not take an effective
action to control the
violence”
21 1982 Meerut,
University
Press
Muslim
and
Hindus
12 people
got killed
and 30 were
injured in
these riots
__________
_
“In the elections that took
place before the riots, a
Muslim MLA was elected,
displacing the BJP
candidate. Soon after, the
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1240
riots broke out over a
trivial issue. Outside
forces, which included
the Shahi Imam of Delhi’s
Jama Masjid and some
BJP leaders joined the
fray. The worst sufferers
of the riots were the
Ansaris, Muslim
weaversxviii”.
22 1982
Decem
ber
Baroda,
Gujarat
Muslim
and
Hindus
17 people
died and 50
injured
during these
riots
_________
Communal violence
occurred when the festival
of Dussera and
Muhharram came on the
same day. There was a
clash between liquor
traders from both the
communities.
23 1983 Malur,
Karnataka
Muslim
and
Hindus
Unknown Three months prior this
violene there was a rape
of harijan women by
Muslim youth,
Immediately after that
there was a molestation of
Hindu girl. As a result
there was a communal
violence
24 1983 Malegaon,
Maharashtr
a
Muslim
and
Hindus
Unknown “There was existing
rivalry between the
Hindus and Muslims.
There was the violation of
Cow Slaughter Act, which
resulted into communal
violence”.
25 1983 Hazaribagh
,
Bihar
Muslim
and
Hindus
Hindu procession turned
into violent communal riot
when it was interrupted by
the Muslims near Jama
Masjid
26 1983 Hyderabad Muslim
and
Hindus
45 died and
150 people
were inured
O the eve of the election ,
the various political
parties like BJP, VHP,
RSS exploited the
religious sentiments of the
general public which led
to the communal tension
between the different
religious groups of the
society. During the period
of five years i.e., from
1979 to 1984 the city has
witnessed whole range of
communal clashes.
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1241
27 1984 Bhiwandi,
Maharashtr
a
Muslim
and
Hindus
146 were
dead and
611 were
injured
The communal violence
was the outcome of Shiva
ji Jayanti Procession
which was banned after
the 1970 riots but due to
continuous political
pressure exerted by Shiv
Sena , the public was
allowed to take out the
procession and which
opposed by the Muslim
community as a result
communal violence
occurred.
28 1984
October
Delhi Hindus
and Sikhs
2733 died
out of
which
majority
were Sikhs
Justice
Jaggannath
Misra
Commission
of
Inquiry
formed
in the
year1985.
In 1999,
the Justice
Nanavati
Commission
began its
Investigatio
ns.
This communal violence
took place in Delhi. It was
after the assassination of
the Mrs Indira Gandhi
then Prime Minister by
her Sikh bodyguards. It
was opined by the Mishra
Commission that it was
organized and planned
crime against one
community. Finding of
Nanavati Commission
revealed that police has
played the active role in
instigation of violence. All
the accused persons were
the important leaders of
the congress partyxix.
29 1985,
April
Ahmedaba
d
It was anti-
reservation
protest.
300 people
died.
“There is large-scale
poverty among the
Harijans and the Muslims
who primarily live in the
slums of Ahmedabad.
Therefore the Muslims
and Harijans did not
respond to a
bandh called to protest the
reservation policy by the
upper caste leaders. This
eventually led to the
burning down of their
houses and destruction of
their propertyxx”.
30 1986 Ahmedaba
d
Hindu
Muslims
275 deaths This violence took place
during the Rath Yatra
Processionxxi
31 1987 Meerut Hindu
Muslims
675 people
died
Minority
Commission
headed by
The report of commission
revealed that, authorities
were responsible for it. As
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1242
Shri
N.C.Saxena
they favoured Hindu
Community
32 1989 Bhadrak,
Orissa
Hindu
Muslims
4 Hindus
and 13
Muslims
died
________ Communal violence
started during the
Ram Navami procession
33 1992 Bombay Hindu
Muslims
More than
900 people
were dead
Justice
Srikrishna
Commission
“The repeated showing of
the debris of the Babri
Masjid by BBC instigated
more violence; a Muslim
mob attacked a temple
which added to the fury
1993 - the Shiv Sena
seemed to have been
preparing for these riots”
34 1992 Bhopal Hindu
Muslims
More than
143 people
were killed
and
majority of
them were
Muslims
Around 30,000 people
who were Muslims were
displaced. Hindu crowd
on 9th December entered
into the homes of Muslim
people.
The administration was
not able to provide the
adequate protection for
these people.
35 2001 Malegaon,
Maharashtr
a
Hindu
Muslims
13 people
died,
including
two police
officers
These riots stated over the
arrest of Muslim young
body distributing
pamphlets outside the
praying place of Muslims.
36 2002 Ahmedaba
d,
Gujarat
Hindu
Muslims
More than
30
reports have
been
prepared
by various
committees.
On March 6,
2002,
inquiry
committee
under
Justice
(Rtd.) KG
Shah and
Justice
Nanavati
Established
“The violence continued
for about a month. The
administration as well as
the government did
nothing to
control the violence and
right-wing organizations
like the VHP and Bajrang
Dal got full support in
spreading violence. The
Modi government
benefited from all this as
the BJP won the
Assembly elections in
December, 2002”.
37 2014 Saharanpur Muslim
Sikh
3 people
died
It was over the land
dispute.
38 2016 Kaliachak
Riots
Hindu
Muslims
Unknown Riots started over the fact
where the Muslim people
were protesting the
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1243
remarks made by Kamlesh
Tiwari a leader of Hindu
Mahasabha, he allegedly
made derogatory remarks
against the Muslim
Prophet Muhammed.
39 2017
July
Baduria
Riots
Hindu
Muslims
No death
was
reported
and more
than 23
people were
injured.
These riots started with
the Face-book post by 11
class student.
40 July
2017
Northern
India
Riots(Punja
b,Haryana,
U.P,
Rajasthan
&New
Delhi
Deara
Sacha
Sauda
Followers
More than
41 people
died.
Riots started due to the
conviction of Gurmeet
Ram Rahim Singh in the
rape case.
The list of the communal incidents mentioned above is not exhaustive apart from these events there were other
incidents of communal violence which has affected the social fabric of society.
Legislative Framework on Communal Violence
There are plethora of legal provisions in India relating to communal violence. Provisions combating the communal
violence are contained in number of general and special laws such as “The Indian Penal Code, 1860; The Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973; The Police Act, 1861; The Arms Act, 1959; The Explosives Act, 1884; The Explosive
Substances Act, 1908; The Explosives Rules, 1983; The National Security Act, 1980; The Unlawful Activities
(Prevention) Act, 1967; The Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984; The Places of Worship (Special
Provisions) Act, 1991; The Press Council Act, 1978; The Prevention of Seditious Meetings Act, 1911; The Protection
of Civil Rights Act, 1955; The Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1988; The Scheduled Castes &
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; various constitutional provisions; etc., and other
miscellaneous provisions” Inspite of all these laws since centuries in the cases of the communal violence the
conviction rate of the perpetrators of the crimes is almost negligible.
Human rights watch (HRW) has criticized the government in India as they have failed to prosecute the senior
officials which are involved in 1984 Anti- Sikh riots and suggested the government to seek police reforms and to
make special legislations to compact communal violence in the country. Recently the national advisory council
released a draft Act which is known as Prevention of Communal and Targeted violence (Access to Justice and
Reparation s) Bill, 2011. Prior to this bill the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation of
victims) Bill, 2005 was introduced and for a long time it remained pending in Rajya Sabha than due to the lack of
political will it did not see the light of the day. The provisions of the bill of 2011 has been criticized by the
opposition i.e. BJP. This bill was presented with the object to combact targeted violence against minorities i.e.
religious and linguistic both, against Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes. The objective of this purposed law was
to increase the accountability of state and to correct discriminating exercise of powers of state in the context of
© 2019 IJRAR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
IJRAR1BLP180 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 1244
identity based violence. Till now no legislation has been made to prevent the communal violence in India due to the
fact that majority of them are politically motivated for the purpose of vote bank politics.
Bibliography
i Ashtosh Varshney, Ethnic Violence and Civil Life 304 (New Havwn: Yale University Press, 2002) ii Bipan Chandra, Communalism in Modern India 4 (New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, 1984) iii Asghar Ali Engineer, “Gujarat Riots in the Light of the History of Communal Violence,”Economic and Political Weekly, 45 , December
14, 2002. viii Asghar Ali Engineer, Communal Riots in Post Independence India, 97( Sagar Books India Ltd, 1984) ix Pannalal Dhar, Ethnic Unrest In India & Her Neighobours, 65 (Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi, 1998) x Mohinder Singh, Social Policy and Administration in India, 184 ( MD Publications Pvt Ltd New Delhi, 1996) xi Donald L. Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riots, 244 (University of California Press, Los Angles and London, 2001). xii Thomas Alber Gilly, The Ethics of Terrorism Innovation Approaches from an International Perspective 25(Chalres C Thomas Publishers
Ltd, United States of America, 2001) xiii Ibid. xviii Hilal Ahmed, Muslim Political Discourse in Postcolonial India: Monuments, Memory, Contestation, 103 ( Routledge press , 2014) xix Sanjay Suri, The Anti Sikh Riots and After, 201(Deep $Deep Publications, 2015)