1 2007-2008 budget presentation. faculty of business administration 2007 – 2008 budget committee...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Introduction Slide• 18% increase in graduates this year• 14.3% increase in UG credit hours taught• 187% increase in Grad credit hours taught• 3rd largest credit hours taught• Largest 2nd, 3rd and 4th year class sizes• 0% real growth in budget over past decade• $3.5 million budget shortfall in 2006-2007• $4.4 million budget shortfall in 2007-2008
3
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Historical Convocation Data(18% Increase this Year)
73
361
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1977
2007
YEAR
Con
vocan
ts
4
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Historical Credit Hours Taught(18.6% Increase this year)
26304
21561
14300
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
1997
2002
2007
YEAR
Cre
dit
Hou
rs T
au
gh
t
5
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
4 YEARS OF ‘PROOF’From 2002 to 2006, at the request of the VP Academic the Faculty of Business Administration has conducted 3 studies to support the position that the Faculty of Business Administration is Critically under funded.
The key finding in each of the studies is that the Faculty of Business Administration fiscal gap is in
excess of $2 million dollars.
6
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Fiscal Gap ($ Millions) 2 YEARS AGO
Average Cost
Internal Benchmark
Local Benchmark
Three University Comparison
U of R Average Cost
Faculty of Education
U of S College of Commerce
University of Victoria
Brock University
University of Calgary
Total Baseline Budget of eight UofR Faculties divided by total Chrs taught x
URBus Chrs.
2005/2006 Baseline Budget of the Faculty
of Education
Published 2005/2006 Budget of the College of Commerce at the
UofS
Total budget of Faculty or School divided by total credit hours taught multiplied by URBus credit hours taught
$5.34 $5.94 $5.10 $5.77 $5.90 $16.90
Faculty of Business Administration 2005/2006 Baseline Budget
$3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00
GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP GAP
$2.34 $2.94 $2.10 $2.77 $2.90 $13.90
7
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Canadian Business School Budgets
Canadian Business School Survey 2004-2005
produced by AACSB International
University Operating Budget
HEC Montreal $88,800,000
University of Toronto $50,903,677
University of British Columbia $42,420,000
Queen's University $40,000,000
University of Alberta $27,500,000
University of Calgary $25,000,000
University Laval $22,000,000
University of Ottawa $17,228,607
Simon Fraser University $16,400,000
Wilfrid Laurier University $15,300,000
University of Manitoba $11,398,571
University of Lethbridge $10,326,300
Brock University $10,112,007
Athabasca University $9,448,000
Memorial University of Newfoundland $7,658,689
Carleton University $5,000,000
Royal Roads University $3,555,740
University of Regina $2,989,000
University College of the Fraser Valley $1,600,000
Trent University $1,444,550
8
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Canadian Business School Budgets
Operating Budget AACSB 2001 Survey
51.6
11.17.2
2.3 1.10
10
20
30
40
50
60
Maximum Median Mean URBus Minimum
Opera
ting B
udget
($m
illions)
Operating Budget AACSB 2005 Survey
88.8
15.320.4
2.9 1.40.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Maximum Median Mean URBus Minimum
Opera
ting B
udget
($m
illions)
2001 Data on 40 Business School
2005 Data on 21 Business School
9
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
4-5 Years of Operation Forecasts
From the 2004-2005 Comprehensive Budget PlanThere is a strong case for the allocation of more funding to this faculty (Administration)………... The Faculty of Administration should not be left behind its counterparts. It should be noted in this connection that the rudimentary comparative information available about the equity of
allocations to faculties suggests that Administration may be underfunded relative to other faculties……..
From the 2005-2006 Operations Forecast“Ensuring the competitiveness of the Faculty with its counterparts at other universities will require additional resources through internal
reallocation, increased tuition fees retained by the Faculty, or an injection of new funds.”
10
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Most Recent Operation Forecasts
From the 2006-2007 Operations Forecast“Ensuring the success and competitiveness of the reconfigured Faculty of Business Administration requires additional resources. Preliminary assessment of the competitive situation of the Faculty vis-à-vis other business schools in Canada suggests additional resource needs of at
least $500,000 over the next two years.
From the 2007-2008 Operations ForecastExternal reviews have determined that a number of key academic and
administrative functions of the University of Regina are seriously under-resourced. The Faculty of Business of Administration operates with funding per student that is significantly less than is available to its
peers elsewhere in Canada, including the University of Saskatchewan. Enrolments in its programs continue to grow at the undergraduate and
graduate levels.
12
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Current Year Operating Budget divided by Current Year Discipline-weighted, CCE-adjusted SUFM FLEs
(2006-2007 FLE's are estimated)
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07Budget Year
$ p
er F
LE
Arts Bus AdminEducation EngineeringFine Arts KHSScience Social WorkAverage Funding Trend Line
Average Funding Trend Line
BUSINESS
Engineering
Social Work
KHS
Fine Arts
Science ArtsEducation
13
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
% of Weighted CCE-Adjusted FLE Funding Received By EACH Faculty
(Current Year FLE BY Current Year Operating Budget)2006-2007 FLE's are estimated
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
110.0%
120.0%
130.0%
140.0%
150.0%
160.0%
170.0%
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Budget Year
% o
f A
ve
rag
e S
UF
M F
LE
Fu
nd
ing
Arts Bus Admin Education
Engineering Fine Arts KHS
Science Social Work Average Funding Trend Line
Fine Arts
Arts
BUSINESS
Education
Science
Social Work
Engineering
KHS
14
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Implications• Faculty members are now teaching one to three overload
course(s) per year at the expense of their research.• 3rd and 4th year classes have been capped at 45 students.
Demand exceeds capacity by 30 to 50%.• Even assuming a willingness of faculty members to
continue to teach overload courses at the same rate we will NOT be able to staff fall and winter classes.
• We can not enter into any new partnerships or programs .• We will not be able to meet the enrolment growth in
undergraduate programs (7.6%) nor the enrolment growth in graduate programs (43.4%) this year (2007-2008).
• The quality and quantity of our research, teaching and service is being negatively effected.
16
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Faculty Revenue Generation 2007-2008
$14 Million(direct faculty only as high as $26 million gross)
17
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Operating Budget Request - UGExisting Positions
• Release the two positions that are being ‘held’New Positions
• Five faculty positions to meet current UG demand
• Four faculty positions to meet 2007-08 UG demand
• Two faculty positions to enable offering Bus 100 demand
• Two APT advisor positions to meet first year student counseling demand
• Covert Technician 1 position to base budget
18
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Operating Budget Request - Grad
New Positions• Create a Director (faculty) position• Two faculty positions to meet 2006-07 Grad
demand• Two faculty positions to meet 2007-08 Grad
demand• One APT graduate student advisor• One CUPE Staff position
19
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Financial Requests• Eliminate $100,000 ‘recovery’ charge to Faculty
• $38,200 equipment fund request
• $33,000 capital funding (Faculty is contributing $400,000 in capital funding in 2007-2008)
20
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Total Request$1.2 Million in positions (1 directors, 15 faculty, 3
APT and 2 CUPE)
$100,000 in new base funding (remove recovery)
$71,200 in new one time funding
Total Request: $1,371,200
21
Faculty of Business Administration 2007 – 2008 Budget Committee Presentation
URBusiness
Support Plan
FiscalImbalance
StabilizeGrowthSupport
2007 - 08 $500,000
2007 - 08 $250,000
2 Years $750,000
2007 - 08 2 Positions released
2007 - 08 16 Positions
2 Years 22 Positions
($2,000,000)
2007 - 08 5 Positions
(3 APT & 2 CUPE)
2008 - 09 2 Positions
2009 - 10 2 Positions
3 Years 9 Positions
2008 - 09 4 Positions