2040 rtp community advisory committee/core technical team #2
DESCRIPTION
Presentation made October 22nd and 23rd, 2012, to the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan's Community Advisory Committee and Core Technical Team.TRANSCRIPT
Chattanooga-Hamilton County/N. GA Transportation Planning Organization
2040 Regional Transportation Plan
Community Advisory Committee MeetingOctober 23, 2012
Chattanooga-Hamilton County/N. GA Transportation Planning Organization
2040 Regional Transportation Plan
Core Technical TeamMeetingOctober 23, 2012
• Overview• Results of Public Outreach Activities• Review of Goals & Objectives• Travel Demand Model Update• Needs Identification Exercise• Public Workshops• Next Steps
Agenda
Overview
Progress to date
Public Outreach Schedule
COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE + CORE TECHNICAL TEAM
Community leaders and technical experts comprise these two committees, whose input will help form plan goals and validate recommendations.
Meeting #1: July 25-26, 2012
Status report to committees: Late August
Meeting #2: Mid October 2012
Status report to committees: Late November
Meeting #3: January 2013
Meeting #4: Mid March 2013
Status report to committees: April 2013
LEADERSHIP SYMPOSIUMS
Large forum events where regional initiatives, strategies, and integration are contemplated by political and community leaders from throughout the region
Visioning Event: August 23, 2012
Project Summit: Early December 2012
WORKSHOPS
Transit Aspirations: August 22, 2012
Visioning: Mid October 2012
Priorities: January 2013
Draft Fiscally Constrained Plan: Mid May 2013
STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
One-on-one and small group interviews with key community figures, agencies, service providers, and other relevant groups.
August 21-24, 2012
Mid October 2012
PUBLIC MEETINGS
Community Open House (kickoff): August 23, 2012
Community Open House: Early December 2012
Final Plan Open House: October 2013
Questionnaire
325 Questionnaires have been completed to date
Transit Aspiration Workshop
• The “Chattanooga Way”• Multi-modal mobility
• High Speed Rail to Atlanta• Connectivity
Open House
32 people attended
Leadership SymposiumOver 80 people attended the event
Mobility Chip Game
Leadership Symposium
Stakeholder Interviews
2 stakeholder interviews completed during August event period
6 interviews scheduled this week, including economic development, quality of life, and service providers
1 jurisdiction meeting with City of Soddy-Daisy
Defining Goals and Objectives
First critical step in the processBased on outreach efforts summarized previously
Performance-Based Plan
• TPO advancing previous performance-based planning efforts from 2035 RTP
• Performance-based plan process:– Supports transparent decision-making in competitive funding environment– Provides context for plan development and helps balance analysis across competing needs– Applies key metrics to track positive outcomes– Ensures investment decisions align with long-term goals– Allows MPO to manage expectations
Goals and Objectives
Performance Measures
Target Setting
Allocate Resources
Measure and Report Results
Quality D
ata
13
Defining Goals and Objectives
• First critical step in the process• Based on outreach efforts
conducted summer 2012– Community Advisory Committee
and Core Technical Committee meetings
– Regional leadership symposium– Transit visioning workshop– Public open house and public
questionnaires– Stakeholder interviews
14
“Community to Region” Framework
Within CommunityCommunity to Region
Region to Region
INVESTMENT NEEDS THAT SUPPORT:
•Local, multimodal connections and access to community resources
•Advance livability and quality of life principles
INVESTMENT NEEDS THAT SUPPORT:
•Strategic, multimodal connections between communities and regional activity/economic centers to support economic development
INVESTMENT NEEDS THAT SUPPORT:
•Mobility and intermodal improvements to ensure region is well connected within the state and the nation • Support economic competitiveness and advance overall economic development potential
GAAL
KY
15
Goals and ObjectivesWithin Community Goal: BUILD AND MAINTAIN SAFE AND HEALTHY
COMMUNITIES
Objectives:• Support walkable and bicycle-friendly communities that promote safe, connections to community resources• Provide incentives for complete streets project design• Encourage investments anchored in integrated transportation and land use planning, that support desired community character•Improve safety through improved system operations, preventative maintenance, and ADA compliance• Prioritize investments in areas where local land use and
development regulations support healthy, safe communities• Prioritize investment that improves multimodal access
to existing or planned transit hubs or that fills gaps in existing multimodal system•Encourage connected street network
16
Goals and Objectives
Community to Region
KY
Goal: CONNECT COMMUNITIES IN THE REGION BY PROVIDING MULTIMODAL TRAVEL OPTIONS TO ACTIVITY AND ECONOMIC CENTERS
Objectives:• Preserve, maintain and improve existing infrastructure before adding new capacity• Provide incentives for complete streets project design• Encourage corridor improvements anchored in integrated transportation and land use planning, that support desired community character• Improve mobility and support economic development by providing expanded set of travel options, with emphasis on public transit• Improve travel time reliability through improved system operations• Incentive corridor protection plans
17
Goals and ObjectivesGoal: GROW ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY THROUGH STRATEGIC INVESTMENT IN CRITICAL REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Objectives:• Preserve, maintain and improve existing
infrastructure before adding new capacity• Support continued economic growth of the region by improving intermodal connections that reduce delay for both people and goods• Reduce delay on critical regional thoroughfares with minimal impact to community, historic and environmental resources• Improve the efficiency and reliability of freight, cargo and goods movement by reducing delay on corridors critical to freight movement• Improve travel time reliability through
improved system operations
Region to Region
GAAL
KY
18
Performance Framework Outcomes
• Enable balanced consideration of investment needs across three geographic scales
• Infuse context into the project evaluation process to better match solutions to needs
• Provide flexible approach to project evaluation to support livability considerations at community level without impeding mobility and economic considerations at regional level
Within CommunityCommunity to Region
Region to Region
GAAL
KY
19
Identifying Future Needs
• Addressing congestion• Preservation of existing system• Assuring safety and security• Active transportation: pedestrian
and bicycle mobility; complete streets; health
• Transit alternatives• Climate resilience
20
Needs: Congestion
• Air quality • Safety impacts• Cost of congestion• Competitiveness• Quality of life
• Future year demand on E&C network– Travel demand model– Congested corridors– Hotspots– Managing operations
2010 2040 % Growth
Population 445,000 560,000 26%
Future Year Congested Highways
21
Purpose• To understand future
transportation demand• To test transportation scenarios• Inputs to air quality analysis
Travel Demand Modeling
Model Features• Standard 4-Step Model• Time of Day• Mode Choice• Truck Model• Vehicle Availability• High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes
Travel Demand Modeling
Data Inputs• Land Use• Travel Characteristics• Roadway and Transit
Characteristics
Travel Demand Modeling
Model Operation• Trip Generation• Trip Distribution• Mode Choice• Assignment
Travel Demand Modeling
Schedule• Base Year
• Model Input – approved September 11• Trip Behavior – approved October 15• Trip Assignment – draft for review October 25• Calibration and Validation – draft October 25
Travel Demand Modeling
Schedule• Future Year – draft October 31
• Future Year on Existing Network• Future Year on Existing and Committed Network• Future Year on Major Route Plan
• Model Interface – draft October 31• Model Training – Mid-December
Travel Demand Modeling
Needs: Congestion
28
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) includes:
• Traffic Incident Management• Travel Information Services
(for roadways and for transit)
• Freeway Management • Automatic Vehicle Location
for Transit• Traffic Signal Coordination
• Work Zone Traffic Management
• Roadway Weather Information
• Electronic Payment (for transit, parking, tolling)
• Freight Management (ports and transfer areas)
Applied individually or in combination
Needs: Congestion
29
Incidents
Special EventsWeather
Work Zones
Why Is TSM&O Important? To take back as much of the road as we can !
C apa
c it y
Recurring congestion
TSM&O
Needs: System Preservation
• Focus of MAP-21• Impact to National competitiveness
– 1 in 4 bridges deficient (2009)– Wilcox Tunnel (1931)– Chickamauga Lock (1940)
73%
18%
9%
Good
Fair
Poor
Pavement Analysis
78%
19%
3%
Not Deficient
Functionally Obsolete
Structurally Deficient
Bridge Analysis
30
Needs: System Preservation
31
Needs: System Preservation
• Data sources:– National Bridge Inventory (FHWA)– State (TN, GA), County and Municipal
departments– National Transit Database (FTA)
• Develop costs to address deficiencies
32
Needs: Safety and Security
• Traffic crashes leading cause of death 5-34yo
• 55 deaths; 330 injuries annually in region
• $1,700 per person
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
404 386 366 319 261 252 332
47
58 56
71
4449
62
Serious Injuries Fatalities
33
Needs: Safety and Security
• Emphasis areas:– Roadway departure– Aggressive driving– Intersection crashes– Seat belt use– Young drivers
Pedacylists/Bicyclists*
Work Zone**
Pedestrian*
Heavy Trucks
Older Drivers (65+)
Alcohol Impaired
Motorcycles*
Young Drivers (15-24)
Seat Belt Use
Intersection
Aggressive
Roadway Departure
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%
0.2%
0.5%
1.3%
3.0%
8.7%
12.3%
12.5%
19.1%
25.2%
32.6%
33.3%
33.4%
34
Needs: Active Transportation
• Human-power replaced by automobile and other powered modes
• Resultant decline in national health– Childhood obesity– Cost to families
• Lack of suitable facilities– Topographic, geographic challenges– Average home 1.6 miles from a facility
→ Complete streets
35
Needs: Active Transportation
• Where are the greatest needs?
• What facilities are needed?
36
Needs: Active Transportation
• Pedestrian trips– Short-distance focus– Land use pattern– Generators– Barriers– Topography
37
Needs: Active Transportation
• Bicycle trips– Longer distance– Generators– Road and traffic
conditions– Bicycle level of service
38
Needs: Active Transportation
39
Needs: Transit Alternatives
Investment Job Creation
Every $1 billion invested in transit capital and operations
Creates and supports an
average of 36,000 jobs
Source: American Public Transportation Association
• Not served by auto travel:– Tourist market– Aging population– Youth less inclined to drive– Zero-car households
• Jobs and economic development
• Fuel cost and oil dependence
• Environment and air quality40
Transit Benefits: Economy
41
Investment Economic Return
For every $1 invested in
public transportation
$4 is generated in economic
returns
Source: American Public Transportation Association
Transit Benefits: Quality of Life
42
Transit Use Annual Savings
Americans living in areas
served by public
transportation
796 million hours in travel time
4,400 fewer miles driven
Source: Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) Report on Congestion and American Public Transportation Association
+
Transit Benefits: Energy
43
Transit Use Savings
In 2011, Americans took
10.4 billion trips
on public transportation
4.2 billion gallons of gasoline
per year
900,000 automobile fill-ups
every day
Source: American Public Transportation Association
+
Transit Benefits: Environment
44
Mode Shift Savings
20 mile roundtrip commute Decrease CO2 air pollutant
emissions by 4,800 pounds per year
= 10% less carbon footprint
in a two-car household
Source: American Public Transportation Association
from driving to transit
Needs: Transit Alternatives
• What’s in our future?– Continued growth in suburban
residential and employment– Aging population– Airport growth focus– High Speed Rail– Limited highway expansion– Fuel costs and air quality impacts– Impact of new technologies
45
Needs: Transit Alternatives
• Vision for Transit– Electric vehicle technology– Connect downtown, airport, Enterprise S
• Strategies– Collaboration & Leadership– Private sector; education partners– Technology– Integration with land use– Service levels by area– Funding
46
Needs: Transit Alternatives
47
Needs: Climate Resilience• September Climate Adaptation
Workshop• Increasing frequency:
– Extreme precipitation– Extreme temperature
• Potential Climate Impacts:– Flooding, erosion, road closures– Landslides and other earthwork failures– Pavement cracking and rutting– Bridges – Scour critical and expansion– Airport take off and landing issues
Needs: Climate Resilience
• Critical Transportation Assets
– Chickamauga Lock and Dam,
– Chattanooga Airport and SR 153 access,
– Interchange of I-75/I-24,
– Enterprise South road and rail access, and
– Downtown bridges.
Needs: Climate Resilience
• Potential Adaptation strategies:– More resilient infrastructure design and
materials– Establish network redundancy and
emergency detours– Better maintenance of drainage systems– Conduct more detailed vulnerability and
risk assessment of certain assets
• Relation to RTP– Performance measure for network
redundancy– Flag RTP projects on identified
critical/vulnerable assets and work with project sponsors on resilient design
Needs: What Next?
• Develop alternative scenarios to address deficiencies:– Spatial component of growth– Balance of modal options
– Focus on systems management?– Focus on transit
and alternative modes?
51
DISCUSSIONDon’t Forget the Workshops
Public Workshop Schedule
OCTOBER 22, 2012 –Constitution Hall – 6:00-8:00 p.m.Soddy-Daisy High School Cafeteria – 6:00-8:00 p.m.
OCTOBER 23, 2012 –Downtown Chattanooga – 4:30-7:00 p.m.Collegedale Municipal Building – 6:00-8:00 p.m.