46094-001: neighborhood upgrading and shelter project ... - nusp2 resettlement plan - kapuas... ·...

Resettlement Plan

May 2018

Indonesia: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter

Project – Phase 2

Prepared by the Regency of Kapuas and Directorate General of Human Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 15 May 2018)

Currency unit – rupiah (Rp)

Rp1.00 = $0.0000725 $1.00 = Rp13,793.00

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank APBD – Anggaran Pendapatan and Belanja Daerah (Regional

Budget Income and Expenditure) DGHS – Directorate of Human Settlements

NOTE

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia and its agencies ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

1 | P a g e

2 | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURE .......................................................................................................... 4

LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... 5

LIST OF APPENDIXS ................................................................................................... 6

ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 7

CHAPTER I ................................................................................................................... 8

PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 8

A. PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................ 8

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT KAPUAS DISTRICT ............................................ 8

C. PROJECT IMPACT .............................................................................................. 9

D. RELOCATION OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ......................................................... 10

CHAPTER II ................................................................................................................ 12

RESETTLEMENT SCOPE .......................................................................................... 12

A. RESETTLEMENT .............................................................................................. 12

B. ACTIVITY IMPACT DESCRIPTION ................................................................... 12

CHAPTER III ............................................................................................................... 14

SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE .................................................. 14

A. THE AFFECTED PEOPLE ................................................................................ 14

B. JOB AND REVENUES ....................................................................................... 15

C. SOCIAL INFORMATION .................................................................................... 15

D. GENDER ISSUE ................................................................................................ 15

E. VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS ......................................................................... 16

CHAPTER IV ............................................................................................................... 17

DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION .......... 17

A. DISSEMINATION............................................................................................... 17

B. ADVANCED COORDINATION .......................................................................... 18

C. DISCLOSURE ................................................................................................... 19

CHAPTER V ................................................................................................................ 20

POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR RESETTLEMENT RESIDENTS ................................... 20

A. OBJECTIVE ....................................................................................................... 20

B. LEGAL BASIC POLICY ..................................................................................... 20

C. PROJECT BASIC PRINCIPLE .......................................................................... 21

D. MATRIC OF AFFECTED PEOPLE RIGHT ........................................................ 22

CHAPTER VI ............................................................................................................... 24

3 | P a g e

IMPACT AND COMPENSATION ................................................................................ 24

A. REASONABLE REIMBURSEMENT VALUE ..................................................... 24

B. COMPENSATION .............................................................................................. 27

C. GAP ................................................................................................................... 27

CHAPTER VII .............................................................................................................. 29

RECOVERY OF REVENUES AND LIVELIHOODS .................................................... 29

A. OBJECTIVE ....................................................................................................... 29

B. RECOVERY AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM ............................................ 29

CHAPTER VIII ............................................................................................................. 32

INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................................... 32

A. GENERAL SETTINGS ....................................................................................... 32

B. THE DIVISION OF ROLES ................................................................................ 32

C. BUDGETING ..................................................................................................... 33

CHAPTER IX ............................................................................................................... 34

MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................................................. 34

A. OBJECTIVE ....................................................................................................... 34

B. MONITORING AND EVALUATION RESULT .................................................... 34

C. RECOMENDATION ........................................................................................... 35

APPENDIX .................................................................................................................. 37

4 | P a g e

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 1. Sei Bagong Bridge condition in Kelurahan Selat ....................................................... 9

Figure 2. Sei Bagong Bridge condition in Kelurahan Selat ..................................................... 10

Figure 3. Map of Affected Location ........................................................................................... 11

Figure 4. The condition of Mrs. Mahmudah's place of business ............................................. 34

Figure 5. Condition of the house and place of business Mr. Sardianor ................................... 35

Figure 6. The condition of the porch of the house and place of business Mrs. Lamsiah ......... 35

5 | P a g e

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. List Name of The Affected People ............................................................................... 13

Table 2. Affected Public Facility and Utility ............................................................................. 13

Table 3. Female Head of Family Profile .................................................................................... 14

Table 4. Affected People Profile ............................................................................................... 14

Table 5. Affected People Occupation........................................................................................ 15

Table 6. Data Of Vulnerable Households .................................................................................. 16

Table 7. Entitlement Matrix ...................................................................................................... 22

Table 8. Reasonable Reimbursement Value of Building House and AP Utilities..................... 24

Table 9. Reasonable Reimbursement Value of Public Facility ................................................ 25

Table 10. Reasonable Reimbursement Value of Loss of Business Income ............................ 25

Table 11. Solatium Criteria ..................................................................................................... 26

Table 12. Calculation of Solatium Against Building Residential & RRV .................................. 26

Table 13. Total Reasonable Reimbursement Value ............................................................... 27

Table 14. GAP Value or Difference ........................................................................................ 28

Table 15. Income Restoration Program .................................................................................. 30

Table 16. Program Type and Implementation of APs Recovery ............................................. 31

Table 17. Name of affected peoples who are beneficiaries of the Recovery Program ............ 31

Table 18. Implementation Schedule ....................................................................................... 33

6 | P a g e

LIST OF APPENDIXS

Appendix 1. Distribution of Slum Settlement District of Kapuas ................................................... 38

Appendix 2. Vulnerable Household ........................................................................................ 39

Appendix 3. RRV for Utility ..................................................................................................... 40

Appendix 4. Resetlement Fee ................................................................................................ 41

Appendix 5. Unit Rate / m2 ..................................................................................................... 42

Appendix 6. Structure Organization .......................................................................................... 43

Appendix 7. Existing house conditions ..................................................................................... 44

Appendix 8. Leaflet ................................................................................................................. 47

7 | P a g e

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB : Asian Development Bank

AP : Affected People APBD : Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (Local Gevernment

Budget) BSPS : Bantuan Stimulan Perumahan Swadaya (Self-help Housing

Stimulants) BKM : Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat (CIO) BLK : Balai Latihan Kerja (Job Training Center)

CIO : Community Implementing Organization

DDR : Due Diligence Report

DED : Detail Engineering Design

DGHP : Directorate General of Housing Provision

DGHS : Directorate General of Human Settlements

HHs : Households

KIP : Kartu Indonesia Pintar (Indonesia Smart Card)

KIS : Kartu Indonesia Sehat (Indonesia Health Card)

KUK : Kredit Usaha Kecil (Credit for Small Business)

LCO : Local Coordinating Office

NMC : National Management Consultant

NPW : Nilai Perhitungan Wajar (Reasonable Reimbursement Value)

NUAP : Neighborhood Upgrading Action Plan

NUSP : Neighborhood Upgrading Shelter Project

PIU : Project Implementation Unit

PDAM : Local Government-owned Water Supply Company

PMU : Project Management Unit

RMC : Regional Management Consultant

RTLH : Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (Inadequate/Poor House)

SATKER : Satuan Kerja (Local Project Implementing Unit/PIU) SATKER PKPBM : Satuan Kerja Peningkatan Kualitas Permukiman Berbasis

Masyarakat (National PIU of Community Based Settlement Quality Improvement)

SIAP : Slum Improvement Action Plan

SPS : Safeguard Policy Statement

8 | P a g e

CHAPTER I

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. PROJECT OVERVIEW

1. New Upgrading And Shelter Project (NUSP-2) is a program initiated by the Government of

Indonesia through the Ministry of Public Works and Housing to support the achievement of the Cities

without Slums Program by 2020 and the provision of housing and settlements in a sustainable

manner in accordance with the mandate of Law No. 1 of 2011 about Housing and Settlement Area

2. NUSP-2 will be implemented in 20 districts/cities to improve the quality of slum areas with

facilitation of activities grouped in three main components, namely: 1) Improving the institutional

capacity of local governments; 2) Improving the quality of slum infrastructure; 3) Provision of new

settlements for low-income communities. One of target districts/cities of NUSP-2 are Kapuas District.

3. Improvement the quality of slum infrastructure (component 2) is carried out in two

approaches: infrastucture construction activities implemented by Community Implementing

Organization (Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat), which called “community contract” at the

community level, and those implemented by professional contractor for complex civil works at the

regional level.

4. NUSP-2 was started in 2015, starting with the implementation of community contract

activities in 73 kelurahans spread across 20 cities/districts. The implementation of complex civil

works began in 2016, including those in Kapuas District.

5. This Due Diligence Report (DDR) is a safeguard social document for the Complex Civil

Work Package in Kapuas District, implementing the construction of the Sei Selat Bridge in

Kelurahan Selat Hulu and Sei Bagong Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Tengah. This DDR contains

policies, guidelines, resettlement processes and profiles of affected people, compensation and local

government assistance programs.

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT KAPUAS DISTRICT

6. Based on the slums profile, the majority of bridges were in poor condition, especially the

wooden stakes which had becoming to decay. Approximately 70% of existing bridges in Kelurahan

Selat Hulu and Selat Tengah were weakened. The conditions of most of wooden poles were

deteriorated that could not safely support 4-wheeled vehicles passing the bridge. Consequently, the

community had difficulties in mobilizing stuffs and limited access to services of health, waste-

collection, fire-fighter and other business activities.

7. NUSP-2 in Kapuas District was carried out in 10 slum kelurahans and had been set through

Decree of Bupati No.772/PU/2014 concerning First Amendment of Decision No.134/PU/2011 on

Stipulation of the Location of Housing and Slum Resettlement Environment, and Decree of Head of

Bappeda of Kapuas No.02/BAPP/B-III/065/1/2016 regarding Location of Structuring and Improving

the Environment Quality of Slum in Kapuas District. List of slum locations and target locations of

NUSP-2 Kapuas District can be seen in Appendix 1.

9 | P a g e

8. In 2016, the local government of Kapuas District implemented infrastructure constructions by

community contracts in 10 kelurahans and 2 infrastructure packages of complex civil works, namely

the bridges of Sei Selat in Selat Hulu and Sei Bagong in Selat Tengah. The construction of the two

bridges was planned as one of the Kapuas slum reduction schemes of the prioritized category,

which included in the SIAP document. The need for the bridge improvement was proposed in a

community proposal, and also proposed through the Sub District Musrenbang (consultation on

development plan), and during community meetings at the time of NUAP preparation in 2015.

9. DED for this complex civil work was prepared by a consultant recruited by the Government

of Kapuas District by APBD financing. The construction plan was disseminated to several

community leaders in early 2016, and widely disseminated to all community level surrounding the

location on 12 July 2016 in Kelurahan Selat Hulu, and on 13 July 2016 in Kelurahan Selat Tengah.

The dissemination events were attended by BKM, LPM (a sort of village council), the Head of RW

(Rukun Warga, hamlet or sub-neighbourhood) and community leaders, as well as officials of sub-

district and district government. They also agreed on the implementation schedule to be done in

August 2016.

10. The construction of Sei Selat bridge in Selat Hulu was projected to be 26 meters long and 6

meters wide, whereas the construction of the Sei Bagong bridge in Selat Tengah to be 24 meters

long and 6 meters wide, and built for one lane over the village street. These bridges are made of

wood covered with concrete and asphalt. The status of land for the construction of the Sei Selat

bridge is owned by the Kapuas district government.

C. PROJECT IMPACT

11. The construction of Sei Selat and Sei Bagong bridges will bring big impact on improving the

social and economic accessibility. The Sei Selat Bridge will connect the Selat Hulu area with the

Selat Tengah and Selat Dalam, and the Sei Bagong Bridge will connect the Selat Tengah with the

Selat Hilir and Selat Hulu.

Figure 1. Sei Bagong Bridge condition in Kelurahan Selat

10 | P a g e

Figure 2. Sei Bagong Bridge condition in Kelurahan Selat

12. Because of the worsening condition of the old bridges, the economic development of the

community in kelurahan Selat Hulu and kelurahan Selat Tengah has been declining, as these

bridges were vital access for their businesses and daily activities. Therefore, the community of

kelurahan Selat Hulu and kelurahan Selat Tengah strongly support the plan of Sei Selat and Sei

Bagong Bridges construction, since these bridges are expected to provide easy and safe access

among many kelurahans of Selat Sub-District and Kapuas City.

13. However, there are six households will be affected by the construction of the bridges, of

which four households in kelurahan Selat Hulu, and two in kelurahan Selat Tengah. Of the four

affected households in kelurahan Selat Hulu, there is one house of semi-permanent building which

needs to be relocated, as this house is situated on disadvantaged site on the river bank at one end

of the bridge. Pictures of initial conditions of affected residents' houses can be seen in Appendix 7.

D. RELOCATION OF AFFECTED PEOPLE

14. The construction and widening of the Sei Selat Bridge unavoidably will relocate a house

used as home and small business (bamboo handicraft shop), which was situated on the river bank

at one end of the bridge. This house belongs to Mrs. Mahmudah, and will be relocated not far from

the original site, about 50 meters away from the bridge.

11 | P a g e

Figure 3. Map of Affected Location

12 | P a g e

CHAPTER II

RESETTLEMENT SCOPE

A. RESETTLEMENT

15. The construction of the Sei Selat Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Hulu and of the Sei Bagong

Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Tengah has affected six households of 25 individuals, consisting of 56%

male and 44% female. The list of their names is in Table 1.

16. Two of six households are woman-headed and classified as vulnerable households,

whereas 4 other households are headed by male.

17. The plan for the construction of the Sei Selat and Sei Bagong bridges and the plan of

relocation of one household have been agreed upon by the affected peoples and the rest of

communities of Selat Hulu and Selat Tengah through a consultation forum. Based on the

deliberations, affected peoples have agreed on the amount of compensation that is between Rp.

4.000.000,- - Rp. 11.000.000,-.

18. The Local Coordinating Office (LCO), the Kapuas District Working Unit (Satker), and the

related consultants have identified the affected objects, calculated the loss assets of the residents

and arranged the assistance facilitation plan to ensure that the affected people will not experience a

decrease in their quality of life or living standards.

B. ACTIVITY IMPACT DESCRIPTION

19. Loss of business. There are six houses would be affected, of which one building serves as

a home/small shop, and the other 3 buildings (house porch) serves as a place of business. After the

resettlement, the affected people are expected to be able keeping their business in a new place.

However, the affected people will experience a decline in their income in a given period of time, thus

they need to be given livelihood assistance during that period (one affected household would be

relocated, five households partly affected, three out of these five used the porch for business. See

details in Table 1.

20. Demolition of the house and porch. There is one house of semi-permanent building that is

used as a home and also for business (small handicraft shop), located on the river bank at one end

of the bridge that unavoidably must be dismantled. Because of the widening and improvement of the

Sei Selat Bridge, this house need to be demolished and relocated. This house is owned by Mrs.

Mahmuda, who is making bamboo handicrafts for her living. The relocation will affect the income of

Mrs Mahmuda in a certain period of time, thus she needs to be given income restoration and some

compensation for her loss. The affected asset as the consequence of the demolition of the house is

valued as follows:

Building of houses and porch, which is calculated based on the type of construction used and

assessed on the basis of Reasonable Reimbursement Value (RRV) or NPW (Nilai

Perhitungan Wajar).

Utilities, such as the cost of a new installation of electricity and water.

13 | P a g e

The land is not considered as part of the affected assets, as the land belongs to the Kapuas

District Government.

21. Impact on public facilities and utilities. There are four affected public facilities, consist of two

units of electricity pole, PDAM (water utility) pipeline network, Telkom (telephone) pole, and fire-

fighter storage/facility (See Table 2.)

Table 1. List Name of The Affected People

No. Name of Affected

People

Building

Area

Affected

Area

Building

Function

Affected

Object

Sei Selat Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Hulu

01. Mahmudah 13 m2 13 m2 Residency and

Business Place

total demolition

02. Sardianor 188 m2 12 m2 House and

Business Place

Front porch

03. Lamsiah 180 m2 9 m2 Residency and

Business Place

Front porch

04. Rudy Hartono 48 m2 18 m2 Residency Front porch

Sei Bagong Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Tengah

01. Setya Darma 300 m2 6 m2 Residency Front porch

02. Abdul Sani 40 m2 8 m2 Residency and

Business Place

Front porch

Table 2. Affected Public Facility and Utility

No. Asset Ownership Affected Object Volume

Sei Selat Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Hulu

01. PLN Electric Pole 1 Unit

02. PDAM Pipeline 1 unit

03. Telkom Telecom Pole 1 Unit

Sei Bagong Bridge in Kelurahan Selat Tengah

01. PLN Electric Pole 1 Unit

02. PDAM Pipeline 1 unit

03. Telkom Telecom Pole 1 Unit

04. Fire Safety Storage Post 1 Unit

14 | P a g e

CHAPTER III

SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

A. THE AFFECTED PEOPLE

22. There are six households that directly affected by construction of Sei Selat and Sei Bagong

bridges. Four of the affected house buildings are used as home (residence) and business, and two

houses merely for living (home).

23. The number of family members of the six affected households is 4-6 individuals. This

indicates that most households have relatively moderate and large family load. Out of six

affected households, there are 2 families (33%) whose heads are female. The profile of

affected female head of household is as follows:

Table 3. Female Head of Family Profile

No. Name Age Family

Member Occupation

Income (per

day)

01. Hj. Lamsiah 68 1 Trader Rp. 50.000,-

02. Mahmudah 42 4 Trader Rp. 50.000,-

Source: Primary Data, already processed, November 2017

24. The total number of affected people for 6 households are 25 individuals, consisting of 56%

male and 44% female. Of the affected peoples, 52% (13 persons) were of productive age, 48%

were of less productive age. (See Table 4.)

Table 4. Affected People Profile

No. Age group Male Female Total

01. 0 - 4 1 0 1

02. 5 - 14 6 3 8

03. 15 – 55 7 6 13

04. >55 1 1 2

TOTAL 15 10 25


15 | P a g e

B. JOB AND REVENUES

25. Job. The occupations of six 6 affected households (AHHs) are trader (4 persons), laborer (1

person) and private sector (1 person).

Table 5. Affected People Occupation

No. Occupation Total %

01. Trader 4 66%

02. Laborer 1 17%

03. Private employee 1 17%


26. Monthly Income. The range of income of affected peoples per month is between Rp.

1.500.000,- - Rp.30.000.000,-. Most of them are still under the Minimum Wage of Kapuas District,

which is Rp. 2,352,859,- .

C. SOCIAL INFORMATION

27. Most of the community of Kelurahan Selat Hulu and Kelurahan Selat Tengah Subdistrict

Selat strongly support the construction plan of Sei Selat and Sei Bagong Bridges, since the bridges

are vital access for their social, culture and economy, which connecting their kelurahans with the rest

of society. After some events of socialization and consultations, all affected peoples provide support

and contribution in the implementation of the construction of the bridges by giving up some or whole

parts of their houses and/or porchs affected by widening the bridge project. The affected peoples

have high expectation that their livelihood and economy will improve after the bridge construction.

28. The affected people have close kinship relationships with the surrounding communities,

since most of them are from the same region and have many close relatives live nearby. Affected

people also have active social and cultural relationships in mutual cooperation. These are showed

by the many community gatherings that have been done regularly, such as arisan (a form of

community rotating savings), reciting Koran, community service, etc.

29. Affected people are eager to have easy access to health, education and market centers.

They also hope to get the convenience of water services, sanitation and garbage/waste-collection.

D. GENDER ISSUE

30. The difficulties of access due to the deteriorating old bridges were experienced by the whole

community of Kelurahan Selat Hulu and Kelurahan Selat Tengah including the affected people and

female group. Women participated in socialization and deliberations meetings to raise their

concerns, including special deliberations of affected vulnerable groups. However, even though many

locals are working in the bridge construction project, women are not involved in physical works, as

these works are too heavy for them.

16 | P a g e

E. VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS

31. Vulnerable groups are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face

the risk of being marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i) households

headed by women, elderly, or disabled, (ii) households falling under the generally accepted indicator

for poverty, (iii) landless households, and (iv) ethnic minorities. In this case, all households are

landless, two households are headed by women and three households are classified as poor,

therefore all affected households are vulnerable. Details are provided in Table 6.

Table 6. Data Of Vulnerable Households

No NameVulner

able

Female

HouseHold

Occupation

Type

Income/

day (IDR)

No

Land

Poor

HouseVulnerable

01. MAHMUDAH 42 Trader 100.000 02. SARDIANOR 50 Trader 150.000 03. LAMSIAH 68 Trader 80.000 04. RUDY HARTONO 45 Worker 25.000 05. SETYA DARMA 58 Private Employees 500.000 06. ABDUL SANI 61 Trader 50.000

17 | P a g e

CHAPTER IV

DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

A. DISSEMINATION

32. The initial dissemination of NUSP-2 in Kelurahan Selat Hulu was conducted on July 12,

2016, and in Kelurahan Selat Tengah was held on July 13, 2016. The dissemination was attended

by representatives from the Public Works Office, representatives from Sub District, Head of

Kelurahan, BKM, community leaders and local residents. In this event, besides aiming to provide

understanding related to slum handling through NUSP-2, participants also discussed the plan to

build the Sei Selat and Sei Bagong Bridges which impacted on some residents' houses due to the

bridge widening project. It was identified that there were six (6) households affected by the

construction of the bridges, which five households were affected partially (only the house porchs)

and one household was affected the whole house. The conclusion of this dissemiation/public

consultation is that all community members, including affected households, strongly supported the

implementation of construction of the Sei Selat and Sei Bagong bridges.

33. The dissemination event was also undertaken to provide information about the grievance

redress mechanism related to the resettlement of one household and five households partially

affected by the dismantling of the house porch. Complaints may be submitted either directly or in

writing to the chief of hamlet or neighbourhood group (RT/RW, Rukun Tetangga/Rukun Warga), or if

necessary to the Kelurahan level or even to the municipal level. The District Satker will act as

Grievance Redress Mechanism Officer. The grievance redress mechanism (GRM), objection or

proposal is implemented through the following stages:

The Kelurahan official will conduct mediation of the complaints to be drilled to completion, if

the complaints are not satisfied, the complaints will be brought to the District level.

The Sub-District official will conduct mediation of the complaints until they are settled; if these

are not settled they will be brought to the District / Public Works level.

The District GRM official will conduct a complaint research.

The result of the research or investigation will be informed to the Affected People (APs) no

later than 12 days to be discussed with a decision that holds the principle of win-win solution.

The results of problem solving or handling of complaints, disseminated through the public

space available such as bulletin boards in offices, government offices, and the District Office

and the Kelurahan Office.

34. Coordination meetings with Affected Peoples (APs) are conducted to approach the affected

people in formulating and agreeing compensation for damages to their homes or assets.

Coordination meetings are conducted in each location, i.e.:

The coordination related to the construction of the Sei Selat Bridge was carried out by the

Asset Identification Team on July 12, 2016 at Mr. Sardianor's house as the head of RT in

Kelurahan Selat Hulu Subdistrict Selat by inviting Affected Peoples (APs), local community

leaders and sub district staff. The result of the consultation was that the residents agreed to

support the implementation of the bridge construction, the amount of compensation for the

affected part of the house and agreed that the residents would be involved in the

implementation of the construction of the bridge.

18 | P a g e

Coordination of the planned construction of the Sei Bagong Bridge was carried out by the

Asset Identification Team on July 13, 2016 at the home of Mr. H. Setya Dharma in

Kelurahan Selat Tengah Subdistrict Selat by inviting Affected Peoples (APs), local

community leaders and sub-district staff. The conclusion of the consultation was that the

residents agreed to support the implementation of the bridge construction, the amount of

compensation for the partly affected of the house and agreed that the residents would be

involved in the implementation of the construction of the bridge.

35. Advanced coordination meeting was also held during the monitoring of the

implementation activities of construction of the bridge by the Monitoring and Reporting Team.

This team will directly monitor the construction activities of bridge widening and the

dismantling and reconstruction of affected people houses. The meeting discussed about

complaint handling mechanism, objection or proposal is implemented through the following stages:

If the affected people (AP) feel disturbed by the development process, complaint can be

delivered in writing or oral to the chief of RT (hamlet), until it is considered settled if not, it will

be taken to the Kelurahan level.

The Kelurahan conduct mediation of complaint material to be discussed until it was settled if

not, it will be brought to the Sub-District level.

The Sub-district will facilitate the resolution of complaint until settled, otherwise will be

brought to the District/PU.

The District’s GRM officials (the mediation team) will conduct a complaint study, including

complaints that directly received by the district team.

The results of such research or investigation will be informed to the Affected People (APs)

no later than 12 days to be deliberated.

Problem solving or handling of complaints, objections and suggestions will be documented

and disclosed for public especially for the APs. Disclosure will be made through available

public spaces such as bulletin boards at the Project office, the District Government office,

and the Sub-district office and the Kelurahan office.

36. During the construction works of the bridge widening project, the implementation will

be monitored by the LCO, the Local Government Unit Work (Satker) and other relevant

agencies, including on-site consultations with affected people, communities around the

activities and the CIO.

B. ADVANCED COORDINATION

37. Meeting coordination and monitoring in order to evaluate the post population transfer

was held on 12-13 October 2017 at the Public Works Kapuas Office. The meeting was

attended by Central Unit Work, National Management Consultants, LCO, Unit Work of Kapuas

District, City Coordinator and BKM/CIO. The result of this meeting had some conclusions that

need to be followed up:

a. Further survey to identify the socio-economic data of the 6-affected households;

b. Identify local government programs that can be provided as a form of recovery

effort or income restoration for affected people;

c. Accelerate the preparation of DDR reports.

19 | P a g e

As for the recovery efforts, here are some programs that have been agreed:

BPJS (Health Insurance), which will be implemented on FY 2018 Quarter 1 to 4,

Financed by the local government’s budget.

Customers of Garbage Bank, which will be implemented on FY 2018 Quarter 1 to

4, financed by the local government’s budget.

38. The LCO and Kapuas District Work Unit will conduct consultations and continuous

coordination with the affected peoples and the concerned various parties. This consultation

aims to determine how far the objectives of the Resettlement have been achieved, and

conduct evaluation to ensure the social and economic conditions of affected people are not

decreased. The implementation of planned assistance programs should be monitored then.

This monitoring and evaluation is expected to provide input to the government in formulating

future policies and programs.

C. DISCLOSURE

39. For the disclosure of public information, this Due Diligence Report (DDR) will be uploaded on

the ADB and the PWH Ministry website, as well as on the Kapuas District Work Unit’s (local

Satker’s) website. Further, the information about DDR will be summarized in the form of leaflet and

distributed for easier access to affected people.

20 | P a g e

CHAPTER V

POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR RESETTLEMENT RESIDENTS

A. OBJECTIVE

40. The objective of resettlement and compensation is to ensure that the project provides

opportunities for affected people to gain benefit so it will not be a worse condition during and after the

implementation.

B. LEGAL BASIC POLICY

41. Policy Framework. This DDR has been prepared in compliance with ADBs Involuntary

Resettlement Safeguards (SPS, 2009) and Operation Manual Section F1/BP, March 2010, and the

Indonesian Government’s law and regulations related to land acquisition that include i) Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in Public Interests; ii) Presidential Regulation no. 71/2012 on

Implementation of Land Acquisition for the Development in Public Interest; iii) Regulation of BPN Head

No. 5/2012 on the implementation guideline for Presidetail Regulation No. 71/2012. In addition, the

Ministry of Finance Regulation No. 13/PMK 02/2013 and Ministry of Home Affair Regulation No.

72/2012 on the guidelines for Law 2/2012 implementation.

1. ADB’s Sosial Safeguard Policy Requirements

42. The ADB SPS, 2009 consolidated three safeguard policies, i.e. (i) involuntary

resettlement (IR), (ii) indigenous peoples (IP), and (iii) environment. Requirements of ADB’s 2009 SPS indicates the following principles: (i) involuntary resettlements must be avoided

where feasible; (ii) minimize involuntary resettlements by exploring project and design

alternatives; (iii) enhance the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-

project levels; and (iv) improve the standards of living of the displaced poor or other vulnerable

groups. The scope of the safeguards include physical replacement (relocation, loss of

residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to

assets, income sources, or means of livelihood as a result of (a) involuntary acquisition of

land, or (b) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and

protected areas. It also stipulates whether the losses and involuntary restrictions are full or

partial, permanent or temporary. Annex 1 lists the 12 policy principles required to meet the

resettlement objectives of ADB’s SPS. The project has been categorized as C for IP (no impact on IP), as no IP have been identified residing in the project locations. The policy on

environment is discussed in a separate document.

2. Other ADB’s Crosscutting Policy Themes

43. ADB’s other crosscutting policy themes includes: (i) the Gender and Development (1998), which adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy to promote gender equity and

to ensure that men and women participate and that their needs are addressed in all stages

including in the decision-making process of development activities; (ii) Public Communication

Policy (2011) that encourages active participation of affected people and other stakeholders

during project preparation and implementation; (iii) Accountability Mechanism (2012). It is part

of ADB‟ s continued efforts to enhance its capacity in responding to and/or resolving the problems associated with the implementation of its policies in all programs or projects it

assists. Prescriptions from these crosscutting ADB’s policy themes shall be incorporated and defined in the appropriate sections of the LARPs.

21 | P a g e

3. Indonesia Government Regulation

44. In 2012, the Government issued Law no. 2 about land acquisition for development for

the Public Interest. The purpose of land acquisition is to provide land for the implementation of

development in order to improve the welfare and prosperity of the nation, state and society

while maintaining the legal interests of the Eligible Party. Some of the things regulated in this

rule are:

The availability of land for the construction of public interest is guaranteed by the state;

Land acquisition is conduct by the government;

Land acquisition must be done in accordance with spatial planning and other related

development plans;

Implementation of land acquisition for the public interest pay attention to the balance

between the interests of development and the interests of society;

Land Acquisition in the public interest carried out by administering proper and fair

compensation;

Disposal of the right holder shall only be made after payment of compensation is

completed based on a court decision;

The land acquisition process should involve all stakeholders.

4. Gap Analysis and Basic Project Principles

45. A gap was found between ADB's Social Safeguard Policy and Indonesian Government

regulations on land acquisition, such as:

The law regulate that have to be balance between the interests of development and

the interests of the people, but has not yet specifically defined the alignments of the

community (including indigenous peoples, vulnerable groups), and the socio-economic

evaluation of affected communities.

The law has not clearly set about resettlement, relocation of affected people and illegal

government land use arrangements.

C. PROJECT BASIC PRINCIPLE

46. Basic Principles The principles to be applied for the project are as follows:

a. Acquisition of land and other assets shall be avoided and minimized as much as

possible by exploring project and design alternatives and appropriate sosial,

economic, operational, and engineering solutions that have the least impact on

populations in the project area.

b. All affected persons included in the cut-off date are eligible for compensation and

rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of tenure status, sosial or economic

standing, and any such factors that may discriminate against achieving the

objectives outlined above. Neither lack of legal rights to the assets lost, or tenure

status or sosial or economic status will not be a bar for the APs from entitlements

to such compensation and rehabilitation measures.

22 | P a g e

c. APs who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying,

(e.g. informal dwellers/squatters), are entitled to compensation for loss of non-land

assets and various options of resettlement assistance.

d. APs shall be fully consulted and informed on the project, their entitlement and

resettlement options. As well as the assistance measures. Ensure the APs

participation in planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation of

resettlements programs. Particular attention will be provided to the vulnerable

groups and ensure their participation in consultations.

e. The project will not cause physical displacement of APs from housing and/or lose

10% or more of total land owned or productive income. If the proposed

infrastructure indicates the need to relocate people, the proposed infrastructure

will be dropped from project financing.

f. The living standards of the affected people are not expected to be reduced due to

the small scale of the land acquisition. This will be ensured in the LARP.

g. There shall be an effective grievance redress mechanisms to receive and facilitate

resolution of the affected persons’ concern during the preparation and implementation of LARPs.

h. Details of the LARPs, including documentation of the consultation process shall be

disclosed to APs and any interested groups through public meetings and in the

form of summary LARPs or information booklets and leaflets in a language that

can be understood by the APs and in an accessible places (such as neighborhood

notice board, project and commune offices).

i. Appropriate monitoring shall be carried out to assess land acquisition objectives

and their impacts on the standard of living of the APs. The M& E, mechanisms

shall be identified and set in place as part of the land acquisition management

system. Monitoring reports should be disclosed.

j. Civil works will not be commenced until (a) payment has been fully provided to the

APs and rehabilitation measures if any, are in place; (b) already-compensated APs

have cleared the area in a timely manner; and (c) the area is free from any

encumbrances.

D. MATRIC OF AFFECTED PEOPLE RIGHT

47. The rights of affected people matrix in the table below summarizes the rights and

assistance received by affected peoples.

48.

Table 7. Entitlement Matrix

Impact Type Aplication Qualified Person Project Entitlement and/or Assistance

Permanent Impact

Loss of entire

building (1 house as

Impacted

buildings as a

Mrs Mahmudah Compensation will be provided in

cash to affected people in

23 | P a g e

Impact Type Aplication Qualified Person Project Entitlement and/or Assistance

place of business

relocated)

whole

Area of 1

(one) building

is 13 m2

accordance with the reasonable

reimbursement value for the

building (resettlement)

Affected people are entitled to

compensation for relocation.

The affected peoples are entitled to

new installation assistance for

electricity and clean water;

Affected people are entitled to a

livelihood recovery program and

the opportunity to work.

LCO and the Kapuas District Unit

Work facilitate demolition and

transportation

LCO and Unit Work provide

opportunities for the affected

peoples if they want to become a

manpower on the project.

The District Government of

KAPUAS will provide facilitation for

life recovery program for affected

people.

Loss some of house

porchs

Residents

house

5 Affected HH Citizens get compensation to

restore back the porch of his house

in accordance with the RRV.

LCO and the Kapuas District Unit

Work facilitate demolition and

transportation

The LCO and Unit Work provide

opportunities for affected people to

become involved in the workforce

Lossing Business Affected people are entitled to RRV

for loss of income for 2 months after

resettlement;

Affected people are entitled to

moving expenses and the cost of

transition.

Loss of building

structure

Post for

storage of fire

equipment

The rebuilding of the storage of fire

post

LCO and Unit Work provide RRV

for rebuilding.

Rights for Vulnerable

Households

6 Affected Peoples Vulnerable groups will get an

economic improvement program

Economic recovery program will

be sustainable.

24 | P a g e

CHAPTER VI

IMPACT AND COMPENSATION

A. REASONABLE REIMBURSEMENT VALUE

49. Reasonable Reimbursement Value is the value of ownership based on equity with

Market Value of a Property, with exceptional attention of extraordinary elements of non-

physical loss cause by the acquisition of rights to the Property (SPI 102 - 3.10). Reasonable

Reimbursement Value (RRV or NPW, Nilai Perhitungan Wajar) is defined the same as the

value of compensation as stipulated in Law No. 2 Year 2012. RRV can be generated from a

combination of physical losses and non-physical losses on an assessment object. This

combination can be described as the sum of Market Value indications for physical losses plus

an indication of the value of non-physical losses.

50. Land. The land occupied by affected people belongs to the Kapuas District

Government, so there is no calculation of Reasonable Reimbursement Value (NPW) to the

land for affected people.

51. Residential Buildings and Porch. Houses affected only one house, with an area of

13 square meters, whereas five (5) houses affected partly (only the house porch) with a total

area of 66 square meters. All house structures are semi-permanent. The age of the building

varies between 16 - 23 Years.

52. Utilities (PLN and PDAM). New installations of PLN (Power Utility) and PDAM (Water

and Pipeline Utility) will be allocated to one AP. The RRV is provided based on the new tariff

of PLN and PDAM in 2017 applicable in Kapuas District.

53. The Reasonable Reimbursement Value of the affected physical losses (buildings and

utilities) is calculated as follows:

RRV of house building is calculated by using the latest unit price of building

materials set by the Regent. Calculation of unit price per square meter for semi-

permanent building is Rp.939.800,-. Details of unit price can be seen in the

appendix 6.

RRV for utilities for new installations of PLN based on the price of 2017 is Rp.

1.400.000,-/house; and for installation of new Water Installation for Low Income

Community (MBR, Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah) is Rp. 120.000,-/

household.

Table 8. Reasonable Reimbursement Value of Building House and AP Utilities

No. Item Unit Price (IDR) Volume Total (IDR)

01. Building 939.800 66 m2 62.026.800

02. Utilities

- Electric Instalation 1.400.00 1 HH 1.400.000

- Water Instalation 120.000 1 HH 120.000

Total Reasonable Reimbursement Value 63.546.800

Source: Primary Data, processed already, November 2017

The total RRV for buildings of 6 affected people including utilities and electricity and drinking

water costs is Rp. 63.546.800, -. Details of NPW for utility can be seen in the appendix 4.

25 | P a g e

54. Public Facility. The affected public facilities are the demolition and removal of 2 units

of electricity poles, Telkom poles and fire safety post located around the bridge construction

path. It is assumed that the transfer and rebuilding cost of the above mentioned public

facilities is Rp. 12,050,000,-.

Table 9. Reasonable Reimbursement Value of Public Facility

No. Item Unit Price (IDR) Volume Total

(IDR)

01. Electric Instalation 1.400.000 2 Unit 2.800.000

02. Water Instalation 750.000 1 Unit 750.000

03. Telkom Instalation 5.000.000 1 Unit 5.000.000

04. Safety Fire Post 3.500.000 1 Unit 3.500.000

Total Reasonable Reimbursement Value 12.050.000


55. Loss of business income. The displacement of citizens will have an impact on their

income, especially for those who have jobs as traders (shops and stalls). Out of six (6) people

affected, there are 4 residents who are living as traders and their income will be affected. As

for the people who work as laborers and private employee, their income will not likely be

affected. The RRV for loss of income (temporarily) is calculated by assuming that for 2 months

the AP will not be able to run their business properly. Thus, the monthly income amount of the

AP becomes the unit price of loss of operating income. Details of RRV Loss of income is as

follows:

Table 10. Reasonable Reimbursement Value of Loss of Business Income


56. Solatium. It is an intangible emotional loss associated with the acquisition of land

used as a dwelling place of the owner. The solatium assessment object is only for residential

buildings. The criteria for solatium calculation are done by considering the period of stay that

is between less than 3 years to more than 30. For more details, the criteria to calculate the

solatium can be seen in Table 11 as follows:

01. MAHMUDAH 42 P Trader 100.000 6.000.000 12.217.400 244.348 6.244.348

02. SARDIANOR 50 L Trader 150.000 9.000.000 11.277.600 225.552 9.225.552

03. LAMSIAH 68 P Trader 80.000 4.800.000 8.458.200 169.164 4.969.164

04. ABDUL SANI 61 L Trader 50.000 3.000.000 7.518.400 150.368 3.150.368

23.589.432

No Name Age Gender Occupation

T O T A L

R R V of

Building

Moving Cost

Assumption

2%

Income Per

Day (IDR)

Total

(IDR)

R R V

(IDR)

26 | P a g e

Table 11. Solatium Criteria No. Solatium Criteria RT – 1A RT – 2A RT – 1B RT – 2B

01. Length of Stay < 3 year 5% of

physical loss

value

5% of physical

loss value

5% of

physical loss

value

5% of physical

loss value

02. Length of Stay 4 – 9 year 10% 10% 10% 10%



05. Length of Stay > 30 year 30% 30% 30% 30%

Source : KPSPI ~ MAPPI

57. Solatium Calculation of Residential Building. The calculation of solatium on

residential building was conducted on six APs based on the length of stay and/or occupying

the house. The calculation of solatium can be seen in the Table 12 below.

Table 12. Calculation of Solatium Against Building Residential & RRV


58. Total Reasonable Reimbursement Value. The total RRV for the assets of six

affected peoples is the sum of RRV for buildings, utilities, public facilities, and the cost of loss

of income, which is as follows:

Length

of Stay

(Year)

Area

(M2)

Unit

Rate/

M2 (IDR)

Building

Asset Value

(IDR)

01. MAHMUDAH SHOP 23 13 939.800 12.217.400 2.443.480 183.261 14.844.141

02. SARDIANOR HOUSE & SHOP 21 12 939.800 11.277.600 2.255.520 169.164 13.702.284

03. LAMSIAH HOUSE & SHOP 21 9 939.800 8.458.200 1.691.640 126.873 10.276.713

04. RUDY HARTONO HOUSE 21 18 939.800 16.916.400 3.383.280 253.746 20.553.426

05. SETYA DARMA HOUSE 17 6 939.800 5.638.800 845.820 84.582 6.569.202

06. ABDUL SANI HOUSE & SHOP 16 8 939.800 7.518.400 1.127.760 112.776 8.758.936

74.704.702

Transaction

1,5 %

R R V

(IDR)Solatium

TOTAL

Type Of

Building

Building

NamaNo

27 | P a g e

Table 13. Total Reasonable Reimbursement Value NO. ASSET VALUE (IDR)

01. Building 74.704.702

02. Utilities 1.520.000

03. Loss Income 23.589.432

TOTAL AFFECTED ASSET VALUE 99.814.134


B. COMPENSATION

59. Act. No. 2 of 2012 declares that compensation shall be appropriate and fair and

equitable compensation shall be granted to the rightful parties in return for the liberated land.

The 10 principle of justice emphasizes that land procurement guarantees the right benefits

and compensation for the entitled parties in order for them to get a chance to live a better life.

60. The transfer for one affected household is done, for the implementation of the bridge

construction project is done voluntarily. Deliberation and consultation was conducted before

the construction of the bridge has begun. All affected communities strongly support the

implementation of the project as it will open access for transportation.

61. The LCO and the Kapuas District Satker provide guarantees to affected people and

other affected objects for assistance and compensation, so as to ensure that ressttlement

does not adversely affect the community.

62. Although the six affected people to build unlicensed buildings on government land

(along the river banks), yet the local government have prepared a compensation fund which

amount has been agreed upon by the affected peoples. Three discussion meetings were held

to determine the amount of compensation fund which was varied, and the amount of agreed

compensation was between Rp. 4.000.000,- to Rp. 11.000.000,-.

63. The total compensation cost provided by the Kapuas District Government is Rp.

34.500.000,-, wherein each affected peoples get between Rp. 4.000.000,- s/d Rp. 11,000,000,

- for unloading and moving costs.

C. GAP

64. GAP; GAP is a method of measurement to determine the value of gaps that occur

during the implementation of RRV. There is a relatively high gap when compared between the

compensation value provided and the fair reimbursement value of six APs. The gap value can

be seen in the following description:

Reasonable Reimbursement Value = 99.814.134,-

Paid Compensation = 34.500.000,-

Gap 65.314.134,-

28 | P a g e

Table 14. GAP Value or Difference


65. To complete the GAP value of Rp.65.314.134,- Kapuas District Government will

provide assistance in the form of development programs, social, health and other assistance.

The program will be implemented in 2018 Quarter 1 - 4. The budget to be used for the

implementation of the program comes from the local government’s budget (APBD) funds.

Building

(IDR)

Utilitas

(IDR)

Loss Income

(IDR)

01. MAHMUDAH 42 P SHOP 23 13 Pedagang 14.844.141 1.520.000 6.244.348 22.608.489 11.000.000 (11.608.489)

02. SARDIANOR 50 L HOUSE & SHOP 21 12 Pedagang 13.702.284 - 9.225.552 22.927.836 5.000.000 (17.927.836)

03. LAMSIAH 68 P HOUSE & SHOP 21 9 Pedagang 10.276.713 - 4.969.164 15.245.877 4.500.000 (10.745.877)

04. RUDY HARTONO 45 L HOUSE 21 18 Buruh 20.553.426 - - 20.553.426 5.000.000 (15.553.426)

05. SETYA DARMA 58 L HOUSE 17 6 Swasta 6.569.202 - - 6.569.202 5.000.000 (1.569.202)

06. ABDUL SANI 61 L HOUSE & SHOP 16 8 Pedagang 8.758.936 - 3.150.368 11.909.304 4.000.000 (7.909.304)

(65.314.134)

And Solatiom

T O T A L

Given

Compensation

Differences

(IDR)No Name Age Gender

Type Of

Building

Length

of Stay

(Year)

Area

(M2)

Reasonable Reimbursement Value

OccupationTotal

(IDR)

29 | P a g e

CHAPTER VII

RECOVERY OF REVENUES AND LIVELIHOODS

A. OBJECTIVE

66. The LCO and the Kapuas District Unit Work provide assurance that the affected

peoples will not experience a decrease in income by providing facilitation of income recovery

and rehabilitation programs in accordance with the needs of the evaluation results.

B. RECOVERY AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM

67. Economic Recovery. There are four houses functioned as places of business

affected by the construction of the bridge. One unit of the house was completely demolished

and moved to a location not far from the old location, while three houses have lost part of their

house porch. The resulting impact has no significant impact on his business. The income

recovery program for affected people will provide an opportunity to become a workforce or

partner in the procurement of materials required by the contractor. In addition to the recovery

program, the affected people will be provided with other existing social and economic

supporting programs by the local government of Kapuas.

68. The local government facilitates supports to seriously affected people. It includes

support to ease the process of small business permit, business certificate and domicile

statement, which facilitated by Kelurahan Selat Hulu and Kelurahan Selat Tengah. In addition,

several following programs to recover living quality and income of the affected people were

provided:

BPJS (Health Insurance) Program by the Department of Health, which will be

implemented on FY. 2018 during Quarter 1 to 4. The program will be financed by local

budget (APBD financing).

Garbage Bank Customer Program by Department of Public Works and the

Environment, which will be implemented in FY 2018 during Quarter 1 to 4. The

program will be financed by local budget (APBD financing).

Various Skill Training Programs based on the interest of the affected people by

Department of Labor which will be implemented in FY 2018 during Quarter 1 to 4. The

program will be financed by local budget (APBD financing).

In details, the income restoration program provided by the government of Kapuas

District is presented in Table 15.

30 | P a g e

Table 15. Income Restoration Program

No

Affected People

Income

Restoration

Program

received

Value (IDR)

Provider Financing

Schedule of implemen

tation

1. Mahmudah 1. Sewing Training 5.000.000,00 Skill Training Center (BLK) of Kapuas District

APBD March - May 2018

2. Rattan Handicraft Training Course

2.000.000,00 Department of Industry, Trading & Cooperative of Kapuas District

APBD May - August 2018

2. Sardianor 1. Carpentry Training

5.000.000,00 Subdepartmen of Construction Service (Jasa Konstruksi/Jakon) of Kapuas District

APBD August - December 2018

2. Credit for Small Business (KUK)

70.000.000,00 Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI)

APBD 2018

3. Lamsiah 1. Credit for Small Business (KUK)


APBD 2018

4. Rudi Hartono 1. Automotive Training Course

5.000.000,00 Skill Training Center (BLK) of Kapuas District

APBD September - November 2018

2. Welding Training Course


APBD October - November 2018

3. Carpentry Training Course



5. Setya Darma 1. Credit for Small Business (KUK)


APBD 2018

2. Skill Certification Course 5.000.000,00 Subdepartmen of

Construction Service (Jasa Konstruksi/Jakon) of Kapuas District

APBD October - December 2018

6. Abdul Sani 1. Automotive Training Course


APBD September - November 2018

2. Welding Training Course


APBD October - November 2018

3. Carpentry Training Course



Total 257.000.000,00

69. Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation of affected houses and utilities has already been done.

With the construction of bridges, local government would be able to improve services for

garbage-collection or waste management by building waste storage facility and providing

improved access to other services.

31 | P a g e

70. Conclusion. The economic recovery or income restoration program for six APs will be

implemented by Kapuas local government to comply with the lack of compensation that has been

given, based on the calculation of Reasonable Reimbursement Fair Value that has been done. The

Recovery Program Value to be provided to cover the Gap will be explained below;

Recovery Program Value = 66.000.000,-

Gap = 65.314.134,-

Difference (Excess Compensation) 685.866,-

Table 16. Program Type and Implementation of APs Recovery

Source: Primary Data, processed already, Januari 2018

Table 17. Name of affected peoples who are beneficiaries of the Recovery Program


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

01.Indonesia Health

Card6 HH 100.000/Month 50.400.000

DINAS

KESEHATANAPBD

02. Tranning 3 HH 1.875.000/Person 6.000.000 BLK APBD

03.Integrated Service

Pos for Elderly2 HH 100.000/Month 9.600.000

DINAS

KESEHATANAPBD

66.000.000

2018 to 2021

Total Cost

NO. Type of programeNumber of

BeneficiariesUnit

Compensation

ValueTOTAL Value P I C Budgeting

Implementation Schedule

Rattan

HandicraftCarpentry

01. MAHMUDAH 12.000.000 12.000.000 -11.608.489 391.511 2018-2020 4 anggota keluarga

02. SARDIANOR 18.000.000 18.000.000 -17.927.836 72.164 2018-2021 4 anggota keluarga

03. LAMSIAH 6.000.000 4.800.000 10.800.000 -10.745.877 54.123 2018-2021 1 anggota keluarga

04. RUDY HARTONO 1.500.000 4.500.000 9.600.000 15.600.000 -15.553.426 46.574 2018-2020 4 anggota keluarga

05. SETYA DARMA 1.600.000 1.600.000 -1.569.202 30.798 2018 2 anggota keluarga

06. ABDUL SANI 3.600.000 4.400.000 8.000.000 -7.909.304 90.696 2018-2019 2 anggota keluarga

66.000.000 -65.314.134 685.866TOTAL (IDR)

BPJSNO. Name R R V IDR G A P SurplusImplementation

YearRemark

Intgerated

Service Post

for Elderly

Training

32 | P a g e

CHAPTER VIII

INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

A. GENERAL SETTINGS

71. In supporting the implementation of NUSP-2, the organization of project management

involves government, community and consultants, at the central level, district/municipal level, to the

Kelurahan and the community. The organizational structure of the project can be seen in Appendix

6

72. The Directorate General of Human Settlements is the Executing Agency of NUSP-2, at the

central level of EA assisted by the Project Management Unit (PMU) and the Satker PKPBM as the

Project Implementation Unit (PIU) at the central level. Whereas at the city level, there is a Local

Coordinating Office (LCO) Kapuas District and Kapuas District Satker as the Project Implementation

Unit at the district level. Each unit is assisted by a national management consultant (NMC) and a

Regional Management Consultant (RMC). The Directorate General of Human Settlements is

responsible for the management of LARP compiled by the LCO and Satker assisted by Safeguard

Specialist at the Regional Management Consultant (RMC). These consultants will work together with

the District PIU to monitor and update the LARP document.

B. THE DIVISION OF ROLES

73. PMU and Unit Work, representing DGHS to perform the tasks are: 1). Establish program

planning and implementation policies; 2). Coordinate all activities to all relevant agencies; 3).

Conduct recruitment of consultants; 4). Coordinate project financial management;5). Coordinate the

procurement process of goods and services; 6). Coordinate intensively with the lender; 7).

Consolidate comprehensive physical and financial reports; 8). Supporting the tasks of LCO and City

Work Unit in carrying out their duties, including in implementing and updating LARP; 9). Conduct

control, monitoring and evaluation of all project implementation.

74. LCO and Unit Work representing the City Government to carry out the tasks are: 1).

Preparing SIAP; 2). Coordinate all activities to all relevant agencies in the region; 3). Coordinating

actors at the community level; 4). Coordinate NUAP drafting and civil work planning; 5). Conducting

regional auctions and coordinating procurement of goods at the community level; 6). Coordinate

intensively with PMU and Satker at the central level; 7). Consolidate physical and financial reports at

city level; 8). Arranging safeguard reports including implementing and updating LARP; 9).

Controlling, monitoring and evaluation of all project implementation at city level; 10). Deliver physical

and financial reports to the PMU and the Central Satker on a regular basis.

75. Management Consultant has the duty of assisting PMU, LCO and Unit Work in; 1).

Technical assistance, management and control of all phases of the project; 2). Developing concepts,

strategies, and training modules covering aspects of gender equality in project activities; 3).

Technical assistance and assistance of Community and Community Group Assistance; 4). Monitor

and evaluate projects; 5). Build awareness and understanding of the community; 6). Facilitate the

community in identifying the problems and needs of infrastructure development, evaluating the

capacity of community institutions; 7). developt participatory planning and decision-making

mechanisms at the community level;8). conduct monitoring and evaluation activities of training

activities through field visits, interviews and data collection; 9). Ensure the fulfillment of gender

equality indicator targets; 10). Monitor the social, environmental and economic impacts of project

implementation, including provision of data and information on environmental preliminary conditions,

33 | P a g e

and reporting on initial project impact assessments; 11). Controll, monitor and evaluate of all project

implementation at city level; 12). Deliver physical and financial reports to PMU, LCO and Unit Work

on a regular basis.

Table 18. Implementation Schedule

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 Initial Coordination for Planning LCO, Satker

2 Identifying Aps Surveyor Team

3 Developing DED Consultant

4 Dissemination LCO, Satker

5 Village Meeting LCO, Satker

6 Coordination Meeting for Compensation LCO, Satker

7 Follow-up meeting LCO, Satker

8 Dissemination of Relocation Plan LCO, Satker

9 Relocation Process LCO, Satker

10 Project Site Preparation Contractor

11 Physical Construction Contractor

12 Aps Monitoring Monev Team

13 Post-Construction Coordination Meeting LCO, Satker

14 Recovery Program Local Government

15 Updating DDR LCO, Satker and Monev Team

No. Activity PIC2016 2017

C. BUDGETING

76. The allocation of asset replacement cost for six affected households, with a total area

of 66 square meters, is derived from the Kapuas District Government Budget. All houses are

semi-permanent structure. House buildings used various type of roof (tiles and asbestos), and

bricks and board type of wall. The age of the buildings is estimated between 16 to 23 years

old. The asset of six affected houses valued by RRV is Rp. 99.814.134,- with estimated asset

value of each house between Rp. 6.569.202,- to Rp. 22.927.836,-

34 | P a g e

CHAPTER IX

MONITORING AND EVALUATION

A. OBJECTIVE

77. Monitoring and evaluation activities are conducted to monitor the implementation of

resettlement of the affected people to be carried out in accordance with the plan and to benefit all

parties involved. Monitoring was conducted by the LCO and the local PIU of Kapuas District in

collaboration with the monitoring and evaluation team.

78. The monitoring and evaluation team has following tasks; 1). Supervision of action plan

implementation starting from dissemination, consultation, land acquisition and relocation, physical

construction, community involvement; 2) Coordination with relevant stakeholders in local

government and affected peoples; 3). Preparation and updating of progress reports on the

implementation including LARP.

B. MONITORING AND EVALUATION RESULT

79. Relocation one Affected Household. One house that serves as a place of business

(kiosk) on behalf of Mrs. Mahmudah moved to a new site not far from the original location.

Mrs. Mahmudah built her business place in the front yard of her original home. The current

condition of business premises is getting better, bigger and more relative merchandise. Ibu

Mahmudah benefited greatly from the bridge, as the distribution and sale of her merchandise

were much smoother. Based on interviews conducted, Mrs. Mahmudah has revenue increase

of about 25% compared to the previous place.

Figure 4. The condition of Mrs. Mahmudah's place of business

80. Losing part of the house porch of the affected peoples. . 5 households that part of

their porch house affected by construction had been repaired. There are 3 houses also used

as a place of business has also been repaired. Affected people whose houses also serve as

a place of business, after the construction of the bridge, most of the revenue increased. For

example, Mr. Sardianor who has a business of buying and selling wood. Previously all the

wood is stored on the porch of the house with a small capacity and minimal buyer

35 | P a g e

opportunities. Currently, after receiving compensation, Mr. Sardianor has dared to open a

wider place next to his home and is now progressing significantly.

Figure 5. Condition of the house and place of business Mr. Sardianor

Figure 6. The condition of the porch of the house and place of business Mrs. Lamsiah

The results of monitoring and evaluation found that the positive impact posed post bridge

development is the economic trend of the community will increase. This is indicated by the

growth of new business opportunities and the development of community businesses that

increase due to easier transportation modes (transportation can be up to business location).

C. RECOMENDATION

81. Recommendations formulated based on monitoring and evaluation results:

36 | P a g e

The government is obliged to ensure the impact of physical, social, and economic

resettlement processes.

Enhancing the dissemination method and scope to community for not building

houses or other assets on government owned land.

Improving the control and licensing mechanism for building development.

Facilitating credit access for affected people running small businesses.

Improving the socialization of a good and healthy lifestyle and generating agent of

change who can promote this lifestyle to various community groups.

Progress of recovery program or corrective action and resettlement impacts to the

livelihood of APs will be monitored and included in the project social safeguard

monitoring report to be submitted to ADB for acceptance and disclosure on it’s website.

37 | P a g e

APPENDIX

38 | P a g e

Appendix 1. Distribution of Slum Settlement District of Kapuas

No Sub District Kelurahan Wide area (ha)

01. Selat Selat Barat 35,8

02. Selat Selat Dalam 15,30

03. Selat Selat Hilir 60,15

04. Selat Selat Hulu 68,7

05. Selat Selat Tengah 60,17

06. Selat Selat Utara 18,96

07. Selat Murung Keramat 23,5

08. Selat Panamas 21

09. Selat Desa Pulau Telo 19,71

10. Selat Desa Pulau Telo Baru 8,38

39 | P a g e

Appendix 2. Vulnerable Household

40 | P a g e

Appendix 3. RRV for Utility

01. MAHMUDAH SHOP 13 1.400.000 120.000 1.520.00002. SARDIANOR HOUSE & SHOP 12 - - -03. LAMSIAH HOUSE & SHOP 9 - - -04. RUDY HARTONO HOUSE 18 - - -05. SETYA DARMA HOUSE 6 - - -06. ABDUL SANI HOUSE & SHOP 8 - -

1.520.000T O T A L

TotalNo NameType of

Building

Area

(M2)PLN PDAM

41 | P a g e

Appendix 4. Resetlement Fee

42 | P a g e

Appendix 5. Unit Rate / m2

43 | P a g e

Appendix 6. Structure Organization

44 | P a g e

Appendix 7. Existing house conditions

The affected peoples had relocated due to the construction of Kapuas Bridge

Initial condition of affected location


45 | P a g e

Initial condition of Ibu Mahmudah’s house

New house for Ibu Mahmudah built nearby

46 | P a g e


Initial condition of house porch of Bp

Sardianor used for business place

47 | P a g e

Appendix 8. Leaflet

48 | P a g e

46094-001: neighborhood upgrading and shelter project ... - nusp2 resettlement plan - kapuas... ·...

Documents