5 life science - kek

1
55 HIGHLIGHTS 54 HIGHLIGHTS 5 Life Science Crystal Structure of the HypA-HypB Complex for [NiFe] Hydrogenase Maturation S. Watanabe 1, 2 , Y. Nishitani 1 and K. Miki 1 ( 1 Kyoto Univ., 2 Tohoku Univ.) Ni-metallochaperone, HypA, and GTPase/ATPase, HypB, are involved in the insertion of a Ni ion into the catalytic cen- ter of [NiFe]-hydrogenases in an unknown manner. We have determined the crystal structures of a transient complex formed between HypA and ATPase-type HypB (HypB AT ) together with Ni ions. The structure reveals that complex for- mation of HypA with HypB AT induces large conformational changes of HypA, resulting in the formation of a Ni binding site. Consequently, the Ni binding affinity of HypA is enhanced from the micromolar to nanomolar range. These results indicate that HypA and HypB AT perform an ATP-dependent Ni acquisition cycle for [NiFe]-hydrogenase maturation. [NiFe]-hydrogenases catalyze reversible H 2 produc- tion with a complex cofactor, NiFe(CN) 2 CO, in their active site [1]. Biosynthesis of the NiFe(CN) 2 CO cofac- tors is a complicated process, in which six Hyp proteins (HypABCDEF) play important roles [2]. First, four Hyp proteins (HypCDEF) catalyze the biosynthesis of CN ligand and incorporate the Fe(CN) 2 CO group into the large subunit of the hydrogenase. After the incorporation of Fe(CN) 2 CO, HypA and HypB perform the insertion of the Ni ion into the hydrogenase large subunit. HypA functions as a Ni-metallochaperone, which consists of a Ni-binding domain (NiBD) and a Zn-binding domain (ZnBD). NiBD binds to a Ni ion with micromolar affinity by using a highly conserved MHE motif. HypB proteins are classified into the GTPase type and the ATPase type (HypB AT ), which share a similar overall structure, despite their low sequence similarity. HypA and HypB form a transient complex in the Ni insertion process. However, the functional relationship between HypA and HypB for the maturation process remains unclear. To elucidate the molecular details of the HypA-HypB com- plex, we determined the crystal structures of the HypA- HypB AT complex from Thermococcus kodakarensis at 1.63–3.10 Å resolution with and without Ni ions in the presence of ATPγS or AMPPCP [3]. Data collection was performed at BL-1A and AR-NE3A. The structure of the HypAB AT complex reveals that two HypA molecules are bound to the opposite surface of the ATP-binding site of the HypB AT dimer (Fig. 1a). The structure of the complex consists of three molecular interfaces (Fig. 1b-d). At interface 1, N-terminal resi- dues of HypB AT assume β-strand conformations, inter- acting with a hydrophobic patch between the α1 helix and β6 strand in the HypA-NiBD (Fig. 1b). At interface 2, hydrophobic interactions and several hydrogen bonds are formed between the α helices in the HypA-ZnBD and the β6-α4 and α3-β4 loops of HypB AT (Fig. 1c). At interface 3, residues surrounding the HypA zinc finger motif form hydrogen bonds with the α helices of the other monomer HypB AT (Fig. 1d). The complex formation induces large conformational changes of HypA (Fig. 2a, b). Upon complex formation, the ZnBD substantially rotates and several 3 10 helices are moved toward HypB AT (Fig. 2a). This rotation dis- rupts a hydrophobic core in the ZnBD and results in the formation of the α3 and α4 helices. In addition, a con- served His residue (HypA-His98) is brought close to the conserved MHE motif. As a result, the amine nitrogen of Met1, the amide nitrogen and Nδ of His2, and Nε of His98 bind a Ni ion with a nearly square-planar geome- try (Fig. 2b). The Oε of Glu3 also makes van der Waals contacts with the Ni ion. ITC experiments showed that complex formation increases the Ni-binding affinity of HypA from the micromolar to nanomolar range by the formation of the Ni-binding site in the HypA-HypB AT complex. Conformational changes induced by ATP hydro- lysis of HypB AT regulate the interaction of HypB AT with HypA. In the HypAB AT complex, the hydrophobic cleft at interface 2 traps hydrophobic residues of HypA. Upon ATP hydrolysis, the Walker A and B motifs of HypB AT rotate and the α4 helix and β6-α4 loop are shifted (Fig. 2c). As a result, the hydrophobic cleft of interface 2 in the ADP-bound HypB AT is changed into a flat molecular surface (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, the ADP-bound HypB AT dimer adopts a more open conformation, affecting inter- face 3. Therefore, conformational changes induced by ATP hydrolysis abolish interfaces 2 and 3, leading to the release of HypB AT from HypA. These findings indicate that there is an ATP-dependent Ni acquisition cycle for [NiFe]-hydrogenase maturation, wherein HypB AT regu- lates the Ni-binding affinity of HypA. Figure 1: Structure of the HypA-HypB AT complex. (a) Overall structure of the HypA-HypB AT complex. Blue and light blue: HypA molecules, with Zn (cyan) and Ni (orange) atoms. Green and yellow: monomers in the HypB AT dimer. Three interfaces are indicated by red dashed-circles. (b) Close-up view of interface 1. (c) Close-up view of interface 2. (d) Close-up view of interface 3. Figure 2: Conformational changes of HypA and HypB AT . (a) Comparison of the ZnBD of HypA in the complex (blue) and in the isolated state (wheat). (b) Detail of the Ni-binding site. (c) Superposition of the Cα backbone of the ATP-bound (pink) and ADP-bound (cyan) states of HypB AT . Curved arrows represent conformational changes induced by ATP hydrolysis. (d) Comparison of the molecular surface of the ATP- bound and ADP-bound states of HypB AT . Residues at interface 2 are shown in green. HypB AT HypA HypA’ (a) (b) P6-B I4-B A3-B Y127-A R12-A V128-A I10-A A9-A T13-A R92-A F99-A I100-A R124-A V103-A A106-A R74-A D117-A F74-B V81-B I120-B Y97-B I94-B L105-B A113-B L117-B E109-B R101-B E116-B N75-A H116-A D117-A E177’-B K149’-B R146’-B R74-A T98-B I9-B α1-B α5’ α6’ α3 α4 A6-A V126-A F107-A D16-A P104-B T103-B D96-A (c) (d) HypB’ AT 1 2 3 REFERENCES [1] W. Lubitz, H. Ogata, O. Rudiger and E. Reijerse, Chem. Rev. 114, 4081 (2014). [2] S. Watanabe, D. Sasaki, T. Tominaga and K. Miki, Biol. Chem. 393, 1089 (2012). [3] S. Watanabe, T. Kawashima, Y. Nishitani, T. Kanai, T. Wada, K. Inaba, H. Atomi, T. Imanaka and K. Miki, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7701 (2015). BEAMLINES BL-1A and AR-NE3A In complex F107 F89 I93 I97 H98 F99 I100 α3 α4 H98 Free state His98 Met1 His2 Glu3 Ni (a) (b) ATP form (in complex) ADP form (c) (d) WA WB ATP (in complex) ADP α4 Interface 2 β6-α4 L

Upload: others

Post on 15-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 5 Life Science - KEK

55HIGHLIGHTS54 HIGHLIGHTS

5 Life Science

Crystal Structure of the HypA-HypB Complex for [NiFe] Hydrogenase Maturation

S. Watanabe1, 2, Y. Nishitani1 and K. Miki1 (1Kyoto Univ., 2Tohoku Univ.)

Ni-metallochaperone, HypA, and GTPase/ATPase, HypB, are involved in the insertion of a Ni ion into the catalytic cen-ter of [NiFe]-hydrogenases in an unknown manner. We have determined the crystal structures of a transient complex formed between HypA and ATPase-type HypB (HypBAT) together with Ni ions. The structure reveals that complex for-mation of HypA with HypBAT induces large conformational changes of HypA, resulting in the formation of a Ni binding site. Consequently, the Ni binding affinity of HypA is enhanced from the micromolar to nanomolar range. These results indicate that HypA and HypBAT perform an ATP-dependent Ni acquisition cycle for [NiFe]-hydrogenase maturation.

[NiFe]-hydrogenases catalyze reversible H2 produc-tion with a complex cofactor, NiFe(CN)2CO, in their active site [1]. Biosynthesis of the NiFe(CN)2CO cofac-tors is a complicated process, in which six Hyp proteins (HypABCDEF) play important roles [2]. First, four Hyp proteins (HypCDEF) catalyze the biosynthesis of CN ligand and incorporate the Fe(CN)2CO group into the large subunit of the hydrogenase. After the incorporation of Fe(CN)2CO, HypA and HypB perform the insertion of the Ni ion into the hydrogenase large subunit. HypA functions as a Ni-metallochaperone, which consists of a Ni-binding domain (NiBD) and a Zn-binding domain (ZnBD). NiBD binds to a Ni ion with micromolar affinity by using a highly conserved MHE motif. HypB proteins are classified into the GTPase type and the ATPase type (HypBAT), which share a similar overall structure, despite their low sequence similarity. HypA and HypB form a transient complex in the Ni insertion process. However, the functional relationship between HypA and HypB for the maturation process remains unclear. To

elucidate the molecular details of the HypA-HypB com-plex, we determined the crystal structures of the HypA-HypBAT complex from Thermococcus kodakarensis at 1.63–3.10 Å resolution with and without Ni ions in the presence of ATPγS or AMPPCP [3]. Data collection was performed at BL-1A and AR-NE3A.

The structure of the HypABAT complex reveals that two HypA molecules are bound to the opposite surface of the ATP-binding site of the HypBAT dimer (Fig. 1a). The structure of the complex consists of three molecular interfaces (Fig. 1b-d). At interface 1, N-terminal resi-dues of HypBAT assume β-strand conformations, inter-acting with a hydrophobic patch between the α1 helix and β6 strand in the HypA-NiBD (Fig. 1b). At interface 2, hydrophobic interactions and several hydrogen bonds are formed between the α helices in the HypA-ZnBD and the β6-α4 and α3-β4 loops of HypBAT (Fig. 1c). At interface 3, residues surrounding the HypA zinc finger motif form hydrogen bonds with the α helices of the other monomer HypBAT (Fig. 1d).

The complex formation induces large conformational changes of HypA (Fig. 2a, b). Upon complex formation, the ZnBD substantially rotates and several 310 helices are moved toward HypBAT (Fig. 2a). This rotation dis-rupts a hydrophobic core in the ZnBD and results in the formation of the α3 and α4 helices. In addition, a con-served His residue (HypA-His98) is brought close to the conserved MHE motif. As a result, the amine nitrogen of Met1, the amide nitrogen and Nδ of His2, and Nε of His98 bind a Ni ion with a nearly square-planar geome-try (Fig. 2b). The Oε of Glu3 also makes van der Waals contacts with the Ni ion. ITC experiments showed that complex formation increases the Ni-binding affinity of HypA from the micromolar to nanomolar range by the formation of the Ni-binding site in the HypA-HypBAT complex.

Conformational changes induced by ATP hydro-lysis of HypBAT regulate the interaction of HypBAT with HypA. In the HypABAT complex, the hydrophobic cleft at interface 2 traps hydrophobic residues of HypA. Upon ATP hydrolysis, the Walker A and B motifs of HypBAT rotate and the α4 helix and β6-α4 loop are shifted (Fig. 2c). As a result, the hydrophobic cleft of interface 2 in

the ADP-bound HypBAT is changed into a flat molecular surface (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, the ADP-bound HypBAT dimer adopts a more open conformation, affecting inter-face 3. Therefore, conformational changes induced by ATP hydrolysis abolish interfaces 2 and 3, leading to the release of HypBAT from HypA. These findings indicate that there is an ATP-dependent Ni acquisition cycle for [NiFe]-hydrogenase maturation, wherein HypBAT regu-lates the Ni-binding affinity of HypA.

Figure 1: Structure of the HypA-HypBAT complex. (a) Overall structure of the HypA-HypBAT complex. Blue and light blue: HypA molecules, with Zn (cyan) and Ni (orange) atoms. Green and yellow: monomers in the HypBAT dimer. Three interfaces are indicated by red dashed-circles. (b) Close-up view of interface 1. (c) Close-up view of interface 2. (d) Close-up view of interface 3.

Figure 2: Conformational changes of HypA and HypBAT. (a) Comparison of the ZnBD of HypA in the complex (blue) and in the isolated state (wheat). (b) Detail of the Ni-binding site. (c) Superposition of the Cα backbone of the ATP-bound (pink) and ADP-bound (cyan) states of HypBAT. Curved arrows represent conformational changes induced by ATP hydrolysis. (d) Comparison of the molecular surface of the ATP-bound and ADP-bound states of HypBAT. Residues at interface 2 are shown in green.

HypBAT

HypA HypA’

(a)

(b)

P6-BI4-B

A3-B

Y127-A

R12-A

V128-A I10-AA9-A

T13-A

R92-A

F99-A I100-A

R124-A

V103-A

A106-A

R74-A

D117-A

F74-B

V81-BI120-B

Y97-BI94-B

L105-B

A113-BL117-B

E109-B

R101-B

E116-B

N75-A

H116-A

D117-A

E177’-B K149’-B

R146’-BR74-A

T98-BI9-B

α1-B

α5’α6’

α3α4

A6-AV126-A

F107-A

D16-A

P104-B

T103-B

D96-A

(c) (d)

HypB’AT

1

2

3

REFERENCES[1] W. Lubitz, H. Ogata, O. Rudiger and E. Reijerse, Chem. Rev.

114, 4081 (2014).[2] S. Watanabe, D. Sasaki, T. Tominaga and K. Miki, Biol.

Chem. 393, 1089 (2012).[3] S. Watanabe, T. Kawashima, Y. Nishitani, T. Kanai, T. Wada,

K. Inaba, H. Atomi, T. Imanaka and K. Miki, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7701 (2015).

BEAMLINESBL-1A and AR-NE3A

In complex

F107

F89I93

I97

H98

F99

I100

α3

α4

H98 Free state

His98Met1

His2Glu3

Ni

(a) (b)

ATP form (in complex)

ADP form

(c) (d)

WA

WB

ATP (in complex)

ADP

α4

Interface 2

β6-α

4 L