a4 pentron artiste clinicalcase 0714 4kris95.bg/documents/brochures/artiste-clinical-case.pdf ·...

1
CLINICAL CASE Artiste ® Nano Composite www.pentron.eu The patient was referred to a dental hygienist and after dental hygiene therapy, teeth 18 and 28 were extracted and the defective restora- tions were gradually addressed. In this case, the restorations in teeth 45 and 46 were re- commended for replacement due to defective marginal seal and secondary caries lesions (Fig. 1). After applying mandibular anesthesia and proper isolation of the operating field by a dental dam, the defective restorations were removed (Fig. 2) and the caries affected by dentine was thoroughly excavated, verified by a caries indicator, and the cavity margins were refined with a fine diamond bur and enamel chisels (Fig. 3). The next step was to apply sectional Matrix band and a ring. The bands were subsequently adapted to the missing margins by a combina- tion of a Teflon coated matrix band along with a ring. The prepared cavities were etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel and after a thorou- gh rinse and removal of excess water, Reten- sin® Plus (SpofaDental) adhesive system was applied, dispersed with air into a thin layer and polymerized for 20 seconds (Fig. 4). The cavities were then converted into Class I cavities (Fig. 5) using a nanohybrid composi- te material called Artiste™ A3 (Pentron). After removal of the bands, the same composite ma- terial was used to stratify the restoration into proper anatomical shape using standard tech- niques (Fig. 6). The final polymerization was made under a glycerol layer for 40 seconds. Using a scaler, excess composite material was removed and the restoration was finished with a fine diamond bur (Fig. 7). The dental dam was removed and the occlusion was adjusted with articulating paper, and then the restorati- on was polished. The patient reported no post-operative sensiti- vity on teeth 45 and 46, and was very satisfied with the results. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 A 39-year-old female patient came to our dental office for routine dental care. After a comprehensive examination, we identified gingivitis, poor dental hygiene, defective restorations in teeth 14, 16, 25, 26, 35, 36, 45 and 46, and partially erupted teeth 18 and 28. Clinical images: courtesy of MDDr. Martin Košťál, Czech Republic. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 7 Fig. 6

Upload: others

Post on 26-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A4 Pentron Artiste ClinicalCase 0714 4kris95.bg/documents/brochures/Artiste-CLINICAL-CASE.pdf · CLINICAL CASE Artiste ® Nano Composite The patient was referred to a dental hygienist

CLINICAL CASE

Artiste®

Nano Composite

www.pentron.eu

The patient was referred to a dental hygienist and after dental hygiene therapy, teeth 18 and 28 were extracted and the defective restora-tions were gradually addressed. In this case, the restorations in teeth 45 and 46 were re-commended for replacement due to defective marginal seal and secondary caries lesions (Fig. 1).

After applying mandibular anesthesia and proper isolation of the operating field by a dental dam, the defective restorations were removed (Fig. 2) and the caries affected by dentine was thoroughly excavated, verified by a caries indicator, and the cavity margins

were refined with a fine diamond bur and enamel chisels (Fig. 3).The next step was to apply sectional Matrix band and a ring. The bands were subsequently adapted to the missing margins by a combina-tion of a Teflon coated matrix band along with a ring. The prepared cavities were etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel and after a thorou-gh rinse and removal of excess water, Reten-sin® Plus (SpofaDental) adhesive system was applied, dispersed with air into a thin layer and polymerized for 20 seconds (Fig. 4). The cavities were then converted into Class I cavities (Fig. 5) using a nanohybrid composi-te material called Artiste™ A3 (Pentron). After

removal of the bands, the same composite ma-terial was used to stratify the restoration into proper anatomical shape using standard tech-niques (Fig. 6). The final polymerization was made under a glycerol layer for 40 seconds.Using a scaler, excess composite material was removed and the restoration was finished with a fine diamond bur (Fig. 7). The dental dam was removed and the occlusion was adjusted with articulating paper, and then the restorati-on was polished.

The patient reported no post-operative sensiti-vity on teeth 45 and 46, and was very satisfied with the results. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3

A  39-year-old  female  patient  came  to  our  dental  office  for  routine  dental  care.  After  a  comprehensive 

examination, we identified gingivitis, poor dental hygiene, defective restorations in teeth 14, 16, 25, 26, 35, 

36, 45 and 46, and partially erupted teeth 18 and 28.

Clinical images: courtesy of MDDr. Martin Košťál, Czech Republic.

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3

Fig. 4 Fig. 5

Fig. 7

Fig. 6